IMR Press / FBL / Volume 28 / Issue 12 / DOI: 10.31083/j.fbl2812333
Open Access Original Research
A Machine Learning Method for Predicting Biomarkers Associated with Prostate Cancer
Show Less
1 Laboratory of Forensic Medicine and Biomedical Informatics, Chongqing Medical University, 400016 Chongqing, China
2 School of Tourism and Media, Chongqing Jiaotong University, 400074 Chongqing, China
3 School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing Three Gorges Medical College, 404120 Chongqing, China
4 Department of Rehabilitation, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), 400038 Chongqing, China
5 Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, University-Town Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, 400016 Chongqing, China
*Correspondence: yqtong@126.com (Yanqiu Tong)
Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed) 2023, 28(12), 333; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2812333
Submitted: 1 September 2023 | Revised: 12 October 2023 | Accepted: 24 October 2023 | Published: 6 December 2023
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent form of malignant tumors affecting the prostate gland and is frequently diagnosed in males in Western countries. Identifying diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers is not only important for screening drug targets but also for understanding their pathways and reducing the cost of experimental verification of PCa. The objective of this study was to identify and validate promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for PCa. Methods: This study implemented a machine learning technique to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of PCa using protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. In addition, multi-database validation and literature review were performed to verify the diagnostic biomarkers. To optimize the prognosis of our results, univariate Cox regression analysis was utilized to screen survival-related genes. This study employed stepwise multivariate Cox regression analysis to develop a prognostic risk model. Finally, receiver operating characteristic analysis confirmed that these predictive biomarkers demonstrated a substantial level of sensitivity and specificity when predicting the prognostic survival of patients. Results: The hub genes were UBE2C (Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme E2 C), CCNB1 (Cyclin B1), TOP2A (DNA Topoisomerase II Alpha), TPX2 (TPX2 Microtubule Nucleation Factor), CENPM (Centromere Protein M), F5 (Coagulation Factor V), APOE (Apolipoprotein E), NPY (Neuropeptide Y), and TRIM36 (Tripartite Motif Containing 36). All of these hub genes were validated by multiple databases. By validation in these databases, these 10 hub genes were significantly involved in significant pathways. The risk model was constructed by a four-gene-based prognostic factor that included TOP2A, UBE2C, MYL9, and FLNA. Conclusions: The machine learning algorithm combined with PPI networks identified hub genes that can serve as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for PCa. This risk model will enable patients with PCa to be more accurately diagnosed and predict new drugs in clinical trials.

Keywords
machine learning
prostate cancer
prognostic biomarker
prognostic model
drug targets
Funding
yyk21213/Chongqing Language and Writing Research Project
cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0485/Chongqing Natural Science Foundation General Project
19YJA860022/Humanities & social sciences of the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China
cstc2016jcyjA0582/Basic science and frontier project of Chongqing Municipal Science and Technology Commission
Figures
Fig. 1.
Share
Back to top