IMR Press / FBS / Volume 5 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.2741/S403

Frontiers in Bioscience-Scholar (FBS) is published by IMR Press from Volume 13 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Frontiers in Bioscience.

Review
Assessing limb apraxia in traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury
Show Less
1 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School in Newark, NJ, and Kessler Foundation and the Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation both in West Orange, NJ
2 University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School in Newark, NJ
3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School in Newark, NJ
4 Behavioral Neurology/Cognitive Rehabilitation, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School in Newark, NJ

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Front. Biosci. (Schol Ed) 2013, 5(2), 732–742; https://doi.org/10.2741/S403
Published: 1 January 2013
Abstract

People with traumatic brain injury (TBI) may demonstrate action planning disorders and limb apraxia. Many patients, who sustain a spinal cord injury (SCI), sustain a co-occurring TBI (11-29 percent of people with SCI) and therefore are at risk for limb apraxia. People with SCI and TBI (SCI/TBI) rely on powered assistive devices which amplify movement. Their ability to learn complex motor compensatory strategies, that is, limb praxis, is critical to function. We wished to identify methods of screening for apraxia in patients with SCI/TBI. We reviewed instruments available for limb praxis assessment, presenting information on psychometric development, patient groups tested, commercial/clinical availability, and appropriateness for administration to people with motor weakness. Our review revealed that insufficient normative information exists for apraxia assessment in populations comparable to SCI/TBI patients who are typically young adults at the time of injury. There are few apraxia assessment instruments which do not require a motor response. Non-motoric apraxia assessments would be optimal for patients with an underlying motor weakness.

Keywords
Rehabilitation
Apraxia
Spinal Cord Injuries
Traumatic Brain Injury
Review
Share
Back to top