- Academic Editor
Background: Cartilage acidic protein 1 (CRTAC1) is a glycosylated
calcium-binding extracellular matrix protein. The oncological functions of CRTAC1
in urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the urinary bladder (UB) and upper urinary tract
(UT) have not yet been elucidated. Based on the published UBUC transcriptome
data, we re-evaluated the differential expression profile of calcium ion
binding–related genes (GO:0005509), and we found that CRTAC1 was the
most significantly downregulated gene in UBUC progression. Therefore, we analyzed
the prognostic value and biological significance of CRTAC1 expression in UC.
Methods: We used immunohistochemistry to determine the CRTAC1 expression
levels in 340 patients with UTUC and 295 patients with UBUC. The CRTAC1
expression was compared with the clinicopathological characteristics, and the
prognostic impact of CRTAC1 on metastasis-free survival (MFS) and
disease-specific survival (DSS) was evaluated. To study the biological functions
of CRTAC1, the proliferation, migration, invasion, and tube formation abilities
of UC-derived cells were evaluated. Results: A low CRTAC1 expression
significantly correlated with high tumor stage, high histological grade,
perineural invasion, vascular invasion, nodal metastasis, and high mitotic rate
(all p
Urothelial carcinomas (UCs) are the most common tumors of the urinary system diagnosed worldwide [1, 2]. They can be located in the urethra, urinary bladder, ureter, or renal pelvis. The majority of UC cases are urinary bladder UC (UBUC), while upper urinary tract UC (UTUC) accounts for only 5%–10% of UCs [3, 4, 5]. The high histological and genetic heterogeneity of UC remains a clinical challenge [6, 7]. For UTUC, radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the standard treatment for high-risk diseases; kidney-sparing surgery is recommended for patients with low risk UTUTC or serious renal insufficiency [5]. For UBUC, most patients receive transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), followed by intravesical instillations [3]. Radical cystectomy with perioperative chemotherapy is recommended for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) or high risk NMIBC [3, 4]. Advances in therapeutic modalities, surgical techniques, and health care systems have improved disease management strategies. However, the overall prognosis remains unsatisfactory [2, 3, 4, 5]. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms underlying UC progression is critical for improving patient stratification and disease management.
Calcium (Ca
CRTAC1, which is a glycosylated extracellular matrix (ECM) protein, is found in
human articular cartilage [12]. Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) integrin-binding motifs and
Phe-Gly (FG) with Gly-Ala-Pro (GAP) (FG-GAP) motifs play significant roles in
cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions [11]. In human dermal fibroblasts, CRTAC1
is involved in ECM development; organization, remodeling, and degradation of
collagen; wound healing; and cellular regeneration, migration, and proliferation
[13, 14]. In human lens epithelial cells, upregulation of CRTAC1 promotes
ultraviolet B-induced pyroptosis and cataract formation via reactive oxygen
species signaling [15, 16]. In osteoarthritis patients, CRTAC1 is an important
regulator and its expression is induced by upregulation of IL-1
We performed transcriptomic profiling of a Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) dataset
(GSE32894) composing of 308 UBUC patients [21]. All probes without filtering or
preselection were analyzed, and the raw data were imported into the Nexus
Expression 3.0 (BioDiscovery, El Segundo, CA, USA) to compute gene abundances, as
described in our previous study [22]. A comparative analysis (noninvasive vs.
invasive UC) was performed to examine the DEGs related to calcium ion binding
(GO:0005509). Those with a significant log
A total of 340 UTUC and 295 UBUC patients who underwent curative surgery between 1998 and 2004 were enrolled in the study, and all specimens were procured from our biobank after obtaining informed consent. The patients’ clinical demographic characteristics, pathological features, and survival outcomes were retrospectively reviewed from their medical charts. None of the patients had undergone preoperative radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Postoperative platinum -based adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to patients with nodal involvement or pT3–pT4 diseases. The pathological grade and tumor stage were determined based on the WHO classification criteria and the 7th edition of the american joint committee on cancer (AJCC) staging system, respectively. The Institutional Review Board of Chi Mei Medical Center approved this study (10501005).
Paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were sliced (4 µm) and placed on
silane-coated slides, as previously described [22]. Deparaffinization,
rehydration, and antigen retrieval were performed according to the standard
procedures. The endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked using 3% H
Five human UC-derived cell lines, namely TCCSUP (American Type Tissue Culture
Collection [ATCC], VA), J82 (ATCC, VA), T24 (ATCC, VA), BFTC905 (Food Industry
Research and Development Institute [FIRDI], Taiwan), and BFTC909 (FIRDI, Taiwan),
were screened for CRTAC1 expression. A non-tumoral uroepithelial cell line,
SV-HUC-1 (ATCC, VA), was used as a control. BFTC909 and T24 cells, which exhibit
relatively low levels of endogenous CRTAC1, were selected for this study. These
cells were cultured as previously described [24]. All cells were incubated at 37
°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO
The Phoenix-Amphotropic (AMPHO) cell line (ATCC, VA) was used to produce lentiviral particles containing CRTAC1. Briefly, the expression plasmids for CRTAC1 and the control vector (pLenti-GIII-CMV) were purchased from Applied Biological Materials, Inc (Richmond, BC, Canada). Following a series of transfections, as described previously [24], T24 and BFTC909 were incubated with culture medium containing viral supernatant and 10 µg/mL polybrene for 24 hours. Afterward, medium containing viral solution was replaced with fresh medium. UC cell lines overexpressing CRTAC1 were obtained as stable clones after puromycin selection (2 µg/mL).
Total RNA was extracted from the UC cells using a Quick-RNA™
Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, Beijing, China), and was reverse-transcribed using a
Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The
cDNA was mixed with the corresponding TaqMan assay probes (CRTAC1,
Hs00907892_m1; MMP2, Hs01548727_m1; MMP9, Hs00957562_m1;
POLR2A, Hs01108291_m1; Applied Biosystems) using TaqMan™
Fast Advanced Master Mix (Thermo Scientific). We then performed quantitative
RT-PCR for the mRNA level by the 2
We used PRO-PREP™ Protein Extraction Solution (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seongnam-Si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) to extract total cellular proteins. The protein concentration was determined by a BCA assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Thirty micrograms of protein were loaded on an mPAGE Bis-Tris Precast Gel (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and transferred onto an Immobilon®-P PVDF membrane (Merck Millipore). The PVDF membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk (Millipore Sigma, Hong Kong, China) incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies: anti-CRTAC1 (ab254691, Abcam), anti-MMP2 (ab86607, Abcam), or anti-GAPDH (ab181602, Abcam). GAPDH served as an internal control. After washing, the membrane was incubated with a diluted secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase [HRP] donkey anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G, BioLegend) for one hour. CRTAC1, MMP2, and GAPDH were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Thermo Scientific).
Cell proliferation was evaluated using a Cell Proliferation Assay Kit
(Fluorometric; BioVision, Hong Kong, China). Briefly, 1000 cells were pleated in
96-well microplates and incubated for 24, 48, and 72 h at 37 °C.
Subsequently, 25 µL of the reaction mixture, including 1
The Boyden chamber technique (Transwell® analysis, Thermo
Scientific, Hong Kong, China) was used to determine the cell migration and
invasion abilities [25]. Cell migration and invasion assays were performed using
Falcon HTS FluoroBlok 24-well inserts (BD
Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and a QCM™ Collagen Cell
Invasion Assay (Millipore), respectively. Each insert was rehydrated with
serum-free medium and 1
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were used to investigate the
effects of CRTAC1 on UC-induced angiogenesis. The Matrigel®
Matrix (Corning, Tewksbury, MA, USA) was used to precoat each inner well of the
µ-Slide Angiogenesis (Ibidi, Gräfelfing, Germany) for 30 min at 37
°C. Then, 50 µL of cell suspension containing 7
The vector pcDNA3-CRTAC1 was constructed as previously described [26]. MMP2 and
MMP9 promoter fragments were cloned by PCR amplification and inserted into a
luciferase reporter gene plasmid vector (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA). The MMP2
and MMP9 promoter reporter constructs and pcDNA3-CRTAC1 construct or their
matching empty constructs were co-transfected in cells using PolyJet
Associations between CRTAC1 expression and different variables were evaluated
using the chi-square test. For survival analyses, the disease-specific survival
(DSS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were plotted using Kaplan–Meier curves
and estimated using the log-rank test at the univariate level. The independent
prognostic factors were estimated using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards
model. All cellular functional studies were done with three replicates. Student’s
t-test was used to analyze differences in cell proliferation, migration,
invasion, HUVEC tube formation, and luciferase activity. Statistical analyses
were performed using SPSS 19 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). In all
analyses, a p-value of
We identified 34 probes covering 22 transcripts associated with calcium ion
binding (GO:0005509) in UBUC invasion using a published transcriptome dataset
(GSE32894). These genes were significantly downregulated at the high tumor stage
(Fig. 1 and Table 1). CRTAC1 was selected for further evaluation because
it was the most downregulated gene. Using the Gene Expression Profiling
Interactive Analysis database, CRTAC1 was found to be significantly decreased in UBUC (n = 404) compared to in adjacent normal tissues
(n = 19) (p
Data mining. Expression profiles of genes associated with the calcium ion binding (GO:0005509) extracted from a published transcriptome of UC (GSE32894) in the Gene Expression Omnibus database. CRTAC1 was the most downregulated gene associated with UC progression. UC, urothelial carcinoma.
Probe | Comparing T1 to Ta | Comparing T2 to T1 | Comparing T2 to Ta | Gene Title | Molecular Function | |||
log ratio | p value | log ratio | p value | log ratio | p value | |||
ILMN_1658384 | –1.9169 | 0 | –1.4772 | 0 | –3.3941 | CRTAC1 | calcium ion binding | |
ILMN_1671473 | –0.149 | 0.0023 | –0.1544 | 0.0009 | –0.3034 | EHD3 | ATP binding, GTP binding, GTPase activity, calcium ion binding, nucleic acid binding, nucleotide binding, protein binding | |
ILMN_1677108 | –0.4308 | 0.0015 | –0.3607 | 0.0018 | –0.7914 | CAPN13 | calcium ion binding, calcium-dependent cysteine-type endopeptidase activity, cysteine-type peptidase activity, peptidase activity | |
ILMN_1684873 | –0.5354 | –0.4178 | 0.0001 | –0.9532 | ARSD | arylsulfatase activity, calcium ion binding, catalytic activity, hydrolase activity, sulfuric ester hydrolase activity | ||
ILMN_1690289 | –0.5202 | –0.4412 | 0.0001 | –0.9615 | DUOX1 | FAD binding, NAD(P)H oxidase activity, NADP or NADPH binding, calcium ion binding, electron carrier activity, heme binding, iron ion binding, oxidoreductase activity, peroxidase activity | ||
ILMN_1697597 | –0.2378 | 0.0005 | –0.2708 | 0.0006 | –0.5086 | KIAA0494 | calcium ion binding | |
ILMN_1699421 | –2.3186 | –0.8656 | 0.0007 | –3.1842 | ANXA10 | calcium ion binding, calcium-dependent phospholipid binding | ||
ILMN_1699809 | –0.997 | –0.5255 | 0.0019 | –1.5225 | CAPNS2 | calcium ion binding | ||
ILMN_1722798 | –0.5597 | –0.4854 | –1.045 | PLCD3 | calcium ion binding, hydrolase activity, phosphoinositide phospholipase C activity, signal transducer activity | |||
ILMN_1738707 | –0.1485 | 0.0022 | –0.1534 | 0.0085 | –0.3019 | S100A13 | calcium ion binding | |
ILMN_1744211 | –0.3374 | 0.0008 | –0.371 | 0.0001 | –0.7085 | PLA2G4F | calcium ion binding, hydrolase activity, phospholipase A2 activity, phospholipase activity | |
ILMN_1744517 | –0.1788 | 0.0068 | –0.1884 | 0.0034 | –0.3673 | GNS | N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfatase activity, calcium ion binding, hydrolase activity | |
ILMN_1747395 | –0.3836 | –0.3163 | –0.6999 | SLC24A1 | antiporter activity, calcium ion binding, calcium; potassium:sodium antiporter activity, symporter activity | |||
ILMN_1750181 | –0.5849 | 0.0081 | –1.2709 | –1.8558 | TESC | calcium ion binding, magnesium ion binding, phosphatase inhibitor activity, protein binding | ||
ILMN_1757660 | –0.4278 | 0.0032 | –0.6223 | –1.0501 | CAPS | calcium ion binding | ||
ILMN_1758888 | –0.6624 | 0.0022 | –0.5401 | 0.0023 | –1.2026 | PADI3 | calcium ion binding, hydrolase activity, protein-arginine deiminase activity | |
ILMN_1763198 | –0.2438 | 0.0005 | –0.2579 | 0.0039 | –0.5017 | STAT6 | calcium ion binding, protein binding, sequence-specific DNA binding, signal transducer activity, transcription factor activity | |
ILMN_1775114 | –0.469 | 0.0003 | –0.6834 | –1.1524 | ENTPD3 | calcium ion binding, hydrolase activity, magnesium ion binding, nucleoside-diphosphatase activity, nucleoside-triphosphatase activity | ||
ILMN_1779401 | –0.4247 | –0.2361 | 0.001 | –0.6608 | CHP | calcium ion binding, potassium channel regulator activity | ||
ILMN_1785175 | –0.3426 | 0.0003 | –0.245 | 0.003 | –0.5876 | SWAP70 | ATP binding, DNA binding, calcium ion binding, protein binding | |
ILMN_2061565 | –0.6809 | 0 | –0.4995 | 0.0005 | –1.1804 | PLCH2 | calcium ion binding, hydrolase activity, molecular_function, phosphoinositide phospholipase C activity, signal transducer activity | |
ILMN_2087941 | –0.6462 | –0.7558 | –1.402 | ENTPD3 | calcium ion binding, hydrolase activity, magnesium ion binding, nucleoside-diphosphatase activity, nucleoside-triphosphatase activity | |||
ILMN_2319913 | –0.3438 | 0.0005 | –0.2817 | 0.0026 | –0.6255 | DGKA | calcium ion binding, diacylglycerol binding, diacylglycerol kinase activity, phospholipid binding, transferase activity, zinc ion binding | |
ILMN_2404182 | –0.2449 | 0.0002 | –0.1527 | 0.0097 | –0.3976 | DUOX1 | FAD binding, NAD(P)H oxidase activity, NADP or NADPH binding, calcium ion binding, electron carrier activity, heme binding, iron ion binding, oxidoreductase activity, peroxidase activity |
UC, urothelial carcinomas; FAD, flavin adenine dinucleotide.
In total, 635 patients (UTUC, 340; UBUC, 295) with a mean age of 65.8 years were included in this study (Table 2). In the UTUC cohort, the majority of patients (n = 284, 83.5%) had a high histological grade, 159 patients (46.8%) had advanced UTUC (pT2-pT4), and 28 patients (8.2%) had metastatic nodal disease at initial diagnosis. Forty-nine patients (14.4%) developed concurrent renal pelvic and ureteral tumors, while 62 (18.2%) developed multiple tumors. In addition, perineural invasion was detected in 19 patients (5.9%), while vascular invasion was detected in 106 patients (31.2%). The UBUC cohort comprised 239 (81.0%) patients with high histological grade tumors, 123 (41.7%) with advanced-stage disease (pT2–pT4), and 29 (7.8%) with metastatic lymph nodes. A total of 156 tumors (52.9%) exhibited high mitotic activity. Perineural invasion and vascular invasion were detected in 49 (16.6%) and 20 (6.8%) patients, respectively.
Parameter | Category | Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma | Urinary Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma | ||||||
Case No. | CRTAC1 Expression | p-value | Case No. | CRTAC1 Expression | p-value | ||||
Low | High | Low | High | ||||||
Gender | Male | 158 | 75 (47.5) | 83 (52.5) | 0.384 | 216 | 112 (51.9) | 104 (48.1) | 0.251 |
Female | 182 | 95 (52.2) | 87 (47.8) | 79 | 35 (44.3) | 44 (55.7) | |||
Age (years) | 138 | 75 (54.3) | 63 (45.7) | 0.185 | 121 | 63 (52.1) | 58 (47.9) | 0.522 | |
202 | 95 (47.0) | 107 (53.0) | 174 | 84 (48.3) | 90 (51.7) | ||||
Tumor location | Renal pelvis | 141 | 74 (52.5) | 67 (47.5) | 0.157 | - | - | - | - |
Ureter | 150 | 67 (44.7) | 83 (55.3) | - | - | - | - | ||
Renal pelvis | |||||||||
ureter | 49 | 29 (59.2) | 20 (40.8) | - | - | - | - | ||
Multifocality | Single | 278 | 135 (48.6) | 143 (51.4) | 0.261 | - | - | - | - |
Multifocal | 62 | 35 (56.5) | 27 (43.5) | - | - | - | - | ||
Primary tumor (T) | Ta | 89 | 16 (18.0) | 73 (82.0) | 84 | 27 (32.1) | 57 (67.9) | ||
T1 | 92 | 35 (56.5) | 57 (43.5) | 88 | 30 (34.1) | 58 (65.9) | |||
T2–T4 | 159 | 119 (74.8) | 40 (25.2) | 123 | 90 (73.2) | 33 (26.8) | |||
Nodal metastasis | Negative (N0) | 312 | 144 (46.2) | 168 (53.8) | 266 | 124 (46.6) | 142 (53.4) | 0.001* | |
Positive (N1–N2) | 28 | 26 (92.9) | 2 (7.1) | 29 | 6 (20.7) | 23 (79.3) | |||
Histological grade | Low grade | 56 | 13 (23.2) | 43 (76.8) | 56 | 13 (23.2) | 43 (76.8) | ||
High grade | 284 | 157 (55.3) | 127 (44.7) | 239 | 134 (56.1) | 105 (43.9) | |||
Vascular invasion | Absent | 234 | 88 (37.6) | 146 (62.4) | 246 | 104 (42.3) | 142 (57.7) | ||
Present | 106 | 82 (77.4) | 24 (22.6) | 49 | 43 (87.8) | 6 (12.2) | |||
Perineural invasion | Absent | 321 | 154 (48.0) | 167 (52.0) | 0.002* | 275 | 131 (47.6) | 144 (52.4) | 0.005* |
Present | 19 | 16 (84.2) | 3 (15.8) | 20 | 16 (80.0) | 4 (20.0) | |||
Mitotic rate (per 10 high power fields) | 173 | 60 (34.7) | 113 (65.3) | 139 | 57 (41.0) | 82 (59.0) | 0.004* | ||
167 | 110 (65.9) | 57 (34.1) | 156 | 90 (57.7) | 66 (42.3) | ||||
MMP2 expression | Low | 223 | 86 (38.6) | 137 (61.4) | 190 | 73 (38.4) | 117 (61.6) | ||
High | 117 | 84 (71.8) | 33 (28.2) | 105 | 74 (70.5) | 31 (29.5) |
* Statistically significant. MMP2, matrix metallopeptidase 2.
Immunostaining was performed to evaluate CRTAC1 expression levels in the
surgical tissue and revealed that invasive UC had lower CRTAC1 immunoreactivity
than noninvasive UC (Fig. 2). The clinical significance of CRTAC1 expression in
UC was also examined (Table 2). In the UTUC cohort, CRTAC1 expression
significantly correlated with the tumor stage (p
Immunohistochemistry. Lower expression of CRTAC1 is associated with higher MMP2 expression, higher CD31-labeled microvascular density, and higher tumor stage in UC. (Scale bar = 200 µm) (CRTAC1, cartilage acidic protein 1; MMP2, matrix metallopeptidase 2; NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer).
Within a median follow-up of 31.7 months, 70 UTUC and 76 UBUC patients developed tumor metastasis, while 61 UTUC and 52 UBUC patients died of UC.
Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess whether CRTAC1
expression affected cancer metastasis and death. With regard to UTUC (Table 3),
55 patients (29.1%) with low CRTAC1-expressing cancers died, while 59 patients
(34.7%) subsequently developed cancer metastasis. Only 11 patients (6.5%) with
high CRTAC1-expressing cancers developed metastatic cancers, while 9 patients
(6.2%) died of UTUC. In particular, low CRTAC1-expressing tumors predicted worse
DSS (Fig. 3A; p
Parameter | Category | Case No. | Disease-specific Survival | Metastasis-free Survival | ||||||||
Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||||||
No. of events | p-value | HR | 95% CI | p-value | No. of events | p-value | HR | 95% CI | p-value | |||
Gender | Male | 158 | 28 (17.7) | 0.8286 | - | - | - | 32 (20.3) | 0.7904 | - | - | - |
Female | 182 | 33 (18.1) | - | - | - | 38 (20.9) | - | - | - | |||
Age (years) | 138 | 26 (18.8) | 0.9943 | - | - | - | 30 (21.7) | 0.8470 | - | - | - | |
202 | 35 (17.3) | - | - | - | 40 (19.8) | - | - | - | ||||
Tumor side | Right | 177 | 34 (19.2) | 0.7366 | - | - | - | 38 (21.5) | 0.3074 | - | - | - |
Left | 154 | 26 (16.9) | - | - | - | 32 (20.8) | - | - | - | |||
Bilateral | 9 | 1 (11.1) | - | - | - | 0 (0.0) | - | - | - | |||
Tumor location | Renal pelvis | 141 | 24 (17.0) | 0.0079* | 1 | - | 0.769 | 31 (22.0) | 0.0659 | - | - | - |
Ureter | 150 | 22 (14.7) | 0.746 | 0.206–2.706 | 25 (16.7) | - | - | - | ||||
Renal pelvis | ||||||||||||
ureter | 49 | 15 (30.6) | 0.634 | 0.163–2.464 | 14 (28.6) | - | - | - | ||||
Multifocality | Single | 273 | 48 (17.6) | 0.0026* | 1 | - | 0.369 | 52 (19.0) | 0.0127* | 1 | - | 0.235 |
Multifocal | 62 | 18 (29.0) | 1.761 | 0.512–6.054 | 18 (29.0) | 1.748 | 0.695–4.394 | |||||
Primary tumor (T) | Ta | 89 | 2 (2.2) | 1 | - | 0.439 | 4 (4.5) | 1 | - | 0.529 | ||
T1 | 92 | 9 (9.8) | 2.383 | 0.489–11.626 | 15 (16.3) | 1.278 | 0.659–2.479 | |||||
T2–T4 | 159 | 50 (31.4) | 2.773 | 0.583–13.196 | 51 (32.1) | 1.353 | 0.792–2.309 | |||||
Nodal metastasis | Negative (N0) | 312 | 42 (13.5) | 1 | - | 55 (17.6) | 1 | - | ||||
Positive (N1–N2) | 28 | 19 (67.9) | 4.644 | 2.393–9.012 | 15 (53.6) | 2.720 | 1.571–4.707 | |||||
Histological grade | Low grade | 56 | 4 (7.1) | 0.0215* | 1 | - | 0.084 | 3 (5.4) | 0.0027* | 1 | - | 0.524 |
High grade | 284 | 57 (20.1) | 2.421 | 0.889–6.589 | 67 (23.6) | 1.194 | 0.693–2.057 | |||||
Vascular invasion | Absent | 234 | 24 (10.3) | 1 | - | 0.206 | 26 (11.1) | 1 | - | 0.131 | ||
Present | 106 | 37 (34.9) | 1.483 | 0.805–2.731 | 44 (41.5) | 1.433 | 0.898–2.287 | |||||
Perineural invasion | Absent | 321 | 50 (15.6) | 1 | - | 61 (19.0) | 1 | - | ||||
Present | 19 | 11 (57.9) | 4.023 | 1.911–8.472 | 9 (47.4) | 2.814 | 1.536–5.156 | |||||
Mitotic rate (per 10 high power fields) | 173 | 27 (15.6) | 0.167 | - | - | 30 (17.3) | 0.0823 | - | - | |||
167 | 34 (20.4) | - | - | 40 (24.0) | - | - | ||||||
MMP2 expression | Low | 223 | 27 (12.1) | 1 | 0.883 | 36 (16.1) | 0.0020* | 0.944 | ||||
High | 117 | 34 (29.1) | 0.956 | 0.522–1.751 | 34 (29.1) | 1.015 | 0.674–1.527 | |||||
CRTAC1 expression | Low | 170 | 55 (32.4) | 1 | - | 59 (34.7) | 1 | - | ||||
High | 170 | 6 (3.5) | 0.188 | 0.073–0.481 | 11 (6.5) | 0.255 | 0.152–0.426 |
* Statistically significant. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Low CRTAC1 expression is associated with a significant prognostic impact on disease-specific survival and metastasis-free survival of patients with UTUC (A and B, respectively) and UBUC (C and D, respectively). UTUC, upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma; UBUC, urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma.
In UBUC (Table 4), low CRTAC1 expression levels were associated with higher
rates of postoperative cancer metastasis (31.2% vs. 10.0%) and cancer-related
deaths (27.1% vs. 8.8%) than high CRTAC1 expression levels. In Kaplan–Meier
survival analysis, CRTAC1 immunoexpression (Fig. 3C,D), pT stage, tumor grade,
perineural invasion, vascular invasion, lymph node status, and mitotic rate were
significantly correlated with worse DSS and MFS. In addition, multivariate Cox
regression analysis showed that CRTAC1 immunoexpression status was an independent
prognosticator of cancer-related death (HR: 0.220, 95% CI: 0.102–0.474,
p
Parameter | Category | Case No. | Disease-specific Survival | Metastasis-free Survival | ||||||||
Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||||||
No. of events | p-value | HR | 95% CI | p-value | No. of events | p-value | HR | 95% CI | p-value | |||
Gender | Male | 216 | 41(19.0) | 0.4446 | - | - | - | 61 (28.2) | 0.2720 | - | - | - |
Female | 79 | 11 (13.9) | - | - | - | 16 (20.3) | - | - | - | |||
Age (years) | 121 | 17 (14.0) | 0.1136 | - | - | - | 32 (26.4) | 0.6875 | - | - | - | |
174 | 35 (20.1) | - | - | - | 45 (25.9) | - | - | - | ||||
Primary tumor (T) | Ta | 84 | 1 (1.2) | 1 | - | 4 (4.8) | 1 | - | 0.010* | |||
T1 | 88 | 9 (10.2) | 3.787 | 1.704–8.418 | 23 (26.1) | 4.131 | 1.296–13.173 | |||||
T2–T4 | 123 | 42 (34.1) | 18.898 | 2.413–148.007 | 50 (40.7) | 5.967 | 1.866–19.083 | |||||
Nodal metastasis | Negative (N0) | 266 | 41 (15.4) | 0.0002* | 1 | - | 0.553 | 61 (22.9) | 1 | - | 0.027* | |
Positive (N1–N2) | 29 | 11 (37.9) | 1.245 | 0.603–2.570 | 16 (55.2) | 2.009 | 1.084–3.724 | |||||
Histological grade | Low grade | 56 | 2 (3.6) | 0.0013* | 1 | - | 0.570 | 5 (8.9) | 0.0007* | 1 | - | 0.938 |
High grade | 239 | 50 (20.9) | 1.557 | 0.338–7.174 | 72 (30.1) | 1.042 | 0.376–2.889 | |||||
Vascular invasion | Absent | 246 | 37 (15.0) | 0.0024* | 1 | - | 0.033* | 54 (22.0) | 0.0001* | 1 | - | 0.843 |
Present | 49 | 15 (30.6) | 0.469 | 0.234–0.939 | 23 (46.9) | 0.940 | 0.509–1.736 | |||||
Perineural invasion | Absent | 275 | 44 (16.0) | 0.0001* | 1 | - | 0.024* | 67 (24.4) | 0.0007* | 1 | - | 0.190 |
Present | 20 | 8 (40.0) | 2.611 | 1.132–6.022 | 10 (50.0) | 1.646 | 0.781–3.466 | |||||
Mitotic rate (per 10 high power fields) | 139 | 12 (8.6) | 1 | - | 0.150 | 23 (16.5) | 1 | - | 0.140 | |||
156 | 40 (25.6) | 1.655 | 0.834–3.287 | 54 (34.6) | 1.472 | 0.881–2.460 | ||||||
MMP2 expression | Low | 190 | 22 (11.6) | 0.0001* | 0.593 | 35 (18.4) | 1 | 0.120 | ||||
High | 105 | 30 (28.6) | 1.175 | 0.651–2.119 | 42 (40.0) | 1.462 | 0.906–2.360 | |||||
CRTAC1 expression | Low | 147 | 43 (29.3) | 1 | - | 55 (37.4) | 1 | - | ||||
High | 148 | 9 (6.1) | 0.220 | 0.102–0.474 | 22 (14.9) | 0.374 | 0.218–0.642 |
* Statistically significant.
To understand the biological function of CRTAC1, endogenous CRTAC1 expression in UC cell lines was determined. Compared to normal urothelial primary cells (SV-HUC-1), all five UC-derived cell lines had lower CRTAC1 mRNA and protein expression (Fig. 4A). Of these, BFTC909 and T24 cells exhibited the lowest levels of CRTAC1 expression; therefore, CRTAC1 overexpression was induced in these two cell lines (Fig. 4B). The overexpression of CRTAC1 in BFTC909 and T24 cells significantly attenuated cell proliferation (Fig. 4C). Matrigel® invasion assays indicated that CRTAC1 overexpression also significantly decreased the number of invading tumor cells, thus indicating its ability to inhibit metastasis (Fig. 4D). Moreover, conditioned medium from CRTAC1-overexpressing BFTC909 and T24 cells markedly inhibited HUVEC tube formation compared to that in the mock group (Fig. 5A). In addition to in vitro studies, we studied the association between CRTAC1 and MVD in our UC specimens. Notably, high CRTAC1 expression was significantly correlated with less CD31-labeled MVD in UTUC and UBUC. (Fig. 5B) To identify the potential cellular pathways that are involved in the regulation of UC invasiveness by CRTAC1, MMP2 was selected for further studies. Initially, IHC staining showed that high CRTAC1 expression negatively correlated with low MMP2 expression in UTUC and UBUC (Table 2; Fig. 2). qRT-PCR and immunoblotting showed that exogenous CRTAC1 expression markedly suppressed MMP2 mRNA and protein expression in BFTC909 and T24 cells (Fig. 6A). Finally, analysis of luciferase activity driven by the MMP2 promoter showed that MMP2 transactivation was negatively associated with CRTAC1 expression in UC cells. These results confirm the role of MMP2 in CRTAC1-driven UC aggressiveness (Fig. 6B).
CRTAC1 expression inhibits growth and invasion of UC cells
in vitro. (A) Compared to SV-HUC-1 cells, endogenous CRTAC1 mRNA and
protein expression is lower in T24 and BFTC909 cell lines. (B) CRTAC1
overexpression was induced in these two cell lines. Compared with lentiviral
infection with the mock sequence, lentiviral infection with CRTAC1 significantly
increased the mRNA and protein levels of CRTAC1 in BFTC909 and T24 cells. (C) The
overexpression of CRTAC1 in BFTC909 and T24 cells significantly attenuates the
cellular proliferation. (D) Using Transwell® migration and
invasion assays, cell invasion is significantly reduced in
CRTAC1-transfected T24 and BFTC909 cell lines, compared to that in the
corresponding empty controls. (*, p
CRTAC1 expression inhibits angiogenesis of UC. (A)
Tube formation is markedly decreased when the HUVECs are incubated with
conditioned medium from the CRTAC1-overexpressing T24 and BFTC909 cells than that
from the mock groups. (B) High CRTAC1 expression is significantly correlated with
less CD31-labeled microvascular density in UTUC and UBUC. (*, p
CRTAC1 inhibits UC invasion by transcriptional repression of
MMP2. (A) Exogenous CRTAC1 expression
significantly downregulated the MMP2 mRNA and protein levels in BFTC909 and T24
cells, using qRT-PCR and western blotting. (B) The luciferase activity of
MMP2 promoter construct was significantly lower in the T24 and BFTC909
cells transfected with the CRTAC1-expressing vector than that in the
empty controls. (*, p
UCs, including UTUC and UBUC, have genetic and clinical heterogeneity [6, 7]. Despite the advances in treatment modalities and surgical techniques, patient survival rates remain poor. Therefore, the incorporation of genetic information may optimize the risk stratification of patients and disease management. Through transcriptomic profiling, we discovered that CRTAC1 was the most downregulated calcium-ion-binding gene in UC. In the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) bladder cancer database, CRTAC1 mRNA abundance in cancer tissues was lower than that in adjacent normal tissues. Its expression was notably decreased in patients with high stage cancer. These observations suggest that CRTAC1 acts as a tumor suppressor during UC progression. Accordingly, the clinical relevance of CRTAC1 was evaluated in our well-characterized UC cohorts. CRTAC1 expression was an independent prognostic factor for MFS and DSS, after adjusting for important pathological parameters. Patients with high CRTAC1 expression had significantly better clinical prognosis. Our study was the first to report an association between CRTAC1 expression and metastasis and survival in UBUC and UTUC.
CRTAC1, located on chromosome 10q24.2, encodes a glycosylated calcium-binding ECM protein called cartilage acidic protein 1 [12]. However, the functions of CRTAC1 reamin poorly understood. It contains a calcium-binding epidermal growth factor domain and an integrin alpha chain-like domain that interacts with ECM proteins and mediates cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions [12, 27, 28]. This protein was originally discovered during the chondrocyte development, and its concentration was relatively high in patients with osteoarthritis [11, 16]. CRTAC1 also promotes apoptosis and pyroptosis in human lens epithelial cells resulting in cataract formation [15, 29]. It regulates energy metabolism and promotes proliferation and migration in primary human dermal fibroblasts [14]. However, the role of CRTAC1 in UC tumorigenesis and progression remains unclear. Accordingly, its prognostic significance in large UBUC and UTUC cohorts was evaluated.
In UBUC, most patients with NMIBC underwent TURBT, intravesical instillations, and cystoscopic assessments after the survey [3]. Progression to high-grade or detrusor muscle invasive tumors is a critical issue in NMIBC management. In this study, low CRTAC1 immunoexpression correlated with high tumor grade and stage in patients with UBUC, suggesting that CRTAC1 is a potential marker of UC invasiveness. Early radical cystectomy may be advantageous for patients with NMIBC with low CRTAC1 expression. Multimodal bladder preservation treatment has been suggested for highly selected patients with MIBC [4, 30]. Patients with low CRTAC1 expression in MIBC, who have a high risk of distant organ and nodal metastases, may require radical surgery. The inclusion of CRTAC1 expression in pathological parameters may help physicians select suitable candidates for bladder-preserving treatments.
UTUC is a rare genitourinary disease, accounting for 5%–10% of new UC cases. At the time of diagnosis, 60% of UTUC cases are considered invasive compared to 25% of UBUC cases [2, 5]. Therefore, current guidelines recommend RNU as the standard treatment for patients with high-grade UTUC [5]. However, the benefits of lymph node dissection and its optimal extent have not yet been determined in non-metastatic UTUC. In this study, low CRTAC1 expression significantly correlated with perineural invasion, vascular invasion, and nodal metastasis, resulting in poor clinical outcomes. If RNU with lymph node dissection is recommended for patients with low CRTAC1 expression, those with UTUC may be suitable candidates for this treatment. These patients are also good candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy because of the significantly high probability of subsequent metastasis. Owing to the old age, renal insufficiency, and medical comorbidities of UTUC patients, kidney-sparing management is recommended for patients with low-grade or low-stage disease [14, 31]. However, accurate preoperative tumor staging is challenging. Ureteroscopic biopsy makes it difficult to obtain adequate tissue to assess invasion depth. Based on our results, aggressive features can be determined by assessing the CRTAC1 immunoexpression status in biopsy specimens. Additional information can also help achieve optimal decision making.
Letsiou et al. [13] elucidated the functions of CRTAC1 in
tissue biology by performing high-throughput RNA sequencing transcriptome
analysis. These results demonstrated that CRATC1 regulates ECM organization in
the complement cascade. The molecular mechanisms of CRTAC1 bioactivity in the
wound healing process have been investigated in primary human dermal fibroblasts
[14]. Gene expression analysis revealed that the CRTAC1 protein was associated
with cell proliferation (downregulated CXCL12 and upregulated NOS2), cell
migration (upregulated AQP3 and downregulated TNC), and extracellular matrix
regeneration and remodeling (upregulated FMOD, upregulated TIMP1, downregulated
FN1, and downregulated COL3A1). Similar altered genes have been found in a
zebrafish skin damage repair model [32]. However, the biology of CRTAC1 in cancer
remains unclear. In lung cancer, CRTAC1 expression in cancer tissues was lower
than in normal tissues. Yu et al. [33] developed a 5-gene
(KRT6A, MELTF, IRX5, MS4A1 and CRTAC1) signature prognostic
stratification system to predict the overall survival of patients with lung
cancer. In gastric cancer, low expression of CRTAC1 was strongly associated with
a poor prognosis. Shen et al. [34] constructed a 8-gene (KCNJ2,
GATA5, CLDN1, SERPINE1, FCER2, PMEPA1, TMEM37 and CRTAC1) survival prognosis
model. They found high-risk group is more likely to escape immunity and less
sensitive to immunotherapy and chemotherapy [34]. In bladder cancer, Yang
et al. [18] found that CRTAC1 overexpression inhibited cell
proliferation, viability, migration, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal
transition process by downregulating Yin Yang 1 to inactivate the TGF-
CRTAC1 expression decreases during the transition from normal urothelium to superficial and invasive UC, indicating its potential role in carcinogenesis and invasiveness. In addition, the exogenous overexpression of CRTAC1 attenuated UC-derived cell line proliferation, invasion, and angiogenesis. Therefore, CRTAC1 is a promising therapeutic target for UC. The present study also demonstrated the independent prognostic importance of CRTAC1 in survival and metastasis risk in patients with UBUC and UTUC. Therefore, close surveillance and aggressive treatments are crucial for patients with UC and low CRTAC1 levels. The addition of CRTAC1 immunostaining to routine histopathological examinations can help clinicians identify high-risk patients and facilitate individualized therapy.
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Conceptualization, WML, SCW, HLK, CCH, CFY; Data curation, TCC, WJW; Formal analysis, CFL, HLK; Investigation, WML, TCC, YCW, CFL; Methodology, WML, SCW, CFY; Supervision, CCH, SCW, CFY; Writing – original draft, WML, TCC; Writing – review & editing, YCW, CFL, HLK, WJW, CCH, SCW, CFY. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chi Mei Medical Center (10501005). Tissue specimens were from the BioBank of Chi-Mei Medical Center. Patient-informed consent was provided under the existing ethics approval procedures.
Not applicable.
This study was supported by Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Taiwan (KMUH110-0R59, KMUH111-1R56) and Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST109-2314-B-037-110-MY3).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.