Correction: Wu et al. Tumor-Suppressor Gene Transmembrane Protein 98 Promotes Proliferation and Inhibits Apoptosis in Ovarian Cancer. Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark. 2022; 27: 210.

Correction: Wu et al. Tumor-Suppressor Gene Transmembrane Protein 98 Promotes Proliferation and Inhibits Apoptosis in Ovarian Cancer. Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark. 2022; 27: 210.

San-Gang Wu^1,†, Jing-Ying Xu^2,†, Jian Lei^2,†, Min Hu², Juan Zhou^2,*

Show Less

¹ Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiamen Cancer Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 361003 Xiamen, Fujian, China

² Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, 361003 Xiamen, Fujian, China

^*Correspondence: zhoujuan@xmu.edu.cn (Juan Zhou)
^†These authors contributed equally.

Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed) 2023, 28(8), 190; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2707210corr

Submitted: 24 November 2022 | Revised: 16 March 2023 | Accepted: 17 April 2023 | Published: 31 August 2023

This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.

Download PDF

Brower Figures

Cite

Abstract

The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1]:

1. In the Materials and Methods, Cell Growth Assay section, ‘OD values were determined after 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours to evaluate cell growth’ should instead read ‘OD values were determined after 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours to evaluate cell growth’. And ‘absorbance at 490 nm was obtained by a microplate reader’ should instead read ‘absorbance at 450 nm was obtained by a microplate reader’.

2. We have deleted an input error in Fig. 4A and have replaced it.

3. In Fig 5, in which the images of 0 h in the IOSE80 si-TMEM98 group in Fig. 5C, 6 h in the SKOV3 oe-TMEM98 group, and 12 h in the SKOV3 NC group in Fig. 5E were misused and have been replaced.

4. In Fig 12, we have deleted an input error in Fig. 12 and have replaced it.

The authors confirm that the mistakes do not affect the results and conclusions of the study and apologize for any inconvenience caused by this mistake.

Error Fig. 4A.

Fig. 4. Cell viability by down-regulation and up-regulation of TMEM98.

(A) Compared with the NC group, the cell viability of SKOV3 cells in the si-TMEM98 group increased significantly. (B) Compared with the NC group, the cell viability of IOSE80 cells in the si-TMEM98 group increased significantly. (C) Compared with the NC group, the cell viability of SKOV3 cells in the oe-TMEM98 group decreased significantly. (D) Compared with the NC group, the cell viability of SKOV3 cells in the oe-TMEM98 group decreased significantly (n = 3, *p $<$ 0.05, **p $<$ 0.01, ***p $<$ 0.001).

Error Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Cell migration by down-regulation and up-regulation of TMEM98.

(A,E) Test the migration ability of SKOV3 cells by scratch test. (B,F) Quantitative analysis of the migration rate of SKOV3 cells. (C,G) Test the migration ability of IOSE80 cells by scratch test. (D,H) Quantitative analysis of migration rate of IOSE80 cells (n = 3, *p $<$ 0.05, **p $<$ 0.01, ***p $<$ 0.001).

Error Fig. 12.

Fig. 12. Summary of this study.

References

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed) Print ISSN 2768-6701 Electronic ISSN 2768-6698