1. Introduction
Fresh and processed tomatoes for human consumption represent a major market in
Europe. Moreover, a number of the compounds present in tomatoes are now
recognized to have beneficial effects on human health [1]. During the processing
of fresh tomatoes to recover the pulp, large amounts of a coproduct
called tomato pomace (TP) are generated. This coproduct accounts for 3 to 5% of
the fresh mass of tomatoes and a world production of 5.4 to 9.0 Mt [2]. The
valorization of tomato pomace constitutes a technical, economic and environmental
challenge for improving crop competitiveness through the development of new
production chains. Indeed, the recycling of this residual biomass provides an
opportunity to recover molecules of interest and to meet market demands.
TP consists principally of primary cell wall polysaccharides, forming fibers
that were characterized by Lenucci et al. [3], who identified these
biopolymers as a useful source for bioethanol production. However, TP is a
mixture of tomato skin, seeds and a small amount of pulp, and it contains a
number of different metabolites found in fresh tomatoes. The skin contains a
cuticle layer consisting of polyesters (cutin) and polysaccharides (cellulose,
hemicelluloses, and pectins) [4]. The seeds are rich in lipids and proteins and
are also a source of tocochromanols (tocopherols and tocotrienols) [5]. Tomato
pomace has been described as a source of carotenoids (including lycopene,
carotenes and lutein), phenolic compounds (such as chlorogenic acid, coumaric
acid, and caffeic acid) and flavonoids, including flavones and flavonols (such as
rutin, quercetin and kaempferol), and flavanols (mainly epicatechin), which are
particularly abundant in the skin [6]. TP also contains molecules from other
families, such as tannins, vitamins, glucoside derivatives, the concentrations of
which depend on environmental factors [7]. Some of these compounds, particularly
lycopene, the principal carotenoid in tomatoes, and -carotene and lutein
[8], are recognized as strong antioxidants. Lycopene has an ability to inhibit
reactive forms of oxygen to combat oxidative stress ten times greater than that
of -tocopherol [9]. Lycopene content is highly dependent on plant
variety and month of harvest.
Carotenoids have already been extracted from TP with pectinolytic and
cellulolytic enzyme treatment, followed by extraction with solvent. The
hydrolysis mediated by enzyme treatments leads to a breakdown of cell wall
structure [2]. In these conditions, 11.5 mg lycopene/g tomato waste can be
extracted with ethyl acetate [10]. Another study [11] showed that lycopene can be
recovered efficiently from tomato skin by treatment with a combination of enzymes
and a surfactant (Span 20), which was retained in the final formulation. In the
absence of pretreatment, tomato pomace has been placed in contact with hexane:acetone mixture at room temperature, to recover carotenoids [12, 13].
Extractions have also been performed by sonication (SAE) or with microwaves
(MAE), to generate fractions with antioxidant properties [14]. Sonication was
applied to media containing ethanol 95° (50 min) [15], sunflower oil (10
min, 70 W) [16] or n-hexane:acetone (100 W, 30 min) [17]. Micro-waves
(300 W) were used with ethanol 95° (60 s) for the extraction of several
metabolites from TP [18]. These two modes of activation made it possible to
decrease contact times and the amount of solvent used, as they facilitated the
diffusion of solvents into the biopolymer network. However, these conditions led
to an increase in the temperature of the extraction medium, which may cause the
degradation of some molecules and a lower selectivity of extraction. Moreover, it
was not possible to exclude the possibility of changes to the chemical structure
of target compounds [14].
Carotenoids were also extracted from tomato pomace or tomato skin with
SC-CO above a pressure of 300 bars and at temperatures between 60 and 80
°C [19, 20, 21, 22]. The fractions obtained were particularly rich in
lycopene, with an extraction yield of up to 82%. These conditions constitute an
interesting alternative to conventional extractions for recovering substances
with a low polarity. CO is not toxic or flammable, and its solvating power
is enhanced above its critical point. Nevertheless, these conditions require
investment in safe equipment. Metabolites from TP have frequently been reported
to be beneficial to health. Lycopene, for example, has been reported to decrease
the risks of developing chronic diseases, such as cancer or heart diseases [23].
Carotenoids extracted from purple tomato skins (in an acetone:hexane mixture)
have been shown to have antitumor effects against various cancer cell lines [24].
The phenolic compound content of a methane extract of TP has been shown to have
antimutagenic activity [25]. Biological properties have generally been studied
after isolating a particular category of compounds, such as lycopene, carotenoids
or polyphenols from TP.
In this study, we assessed the value of whole extracts obtained from TP for use
in the fields of cosmetics and nutraceuticals. Our methodology was based on the
selection of eco-compatible processes for treating tomato pomace and generating
cocktails of molecules, the synergic effects of which could result in interesting
therapeutic properties. The effects of pretreatment of the raw material before
solvent extraction, particularly for oxidative treatment, have never before been
evaluated. The fractions isolated, characterized by the presence of key
molecules, were analyzed to assess their antioxidant properties (DPPH
inhibition), anti-inflammatory activities (15-lipoxygenase inhibition),
anti-proliferative effects on 116 HCT cancer cell lines, anti-diabetic potential
(inhibition of -amylase and -glucosidase) and antiviral
activities against Zika virus.
2. Materials and Methods
Fig. 1 describes the strategy used for extract preparation. Half the
tomato pomace samples were subjected to chemical or enzymatic pretreatment in an
aqueous medium. The other samples were treated directly by maceration in an
organic solvent or placed in an SC-CO reactor.
Fig. 1.
Strategy for the preparation of extracts from dried tomato
waste.
Quantitative spectrophotometric analyses and qualitative analyses (HPLC-DAD)
analyses were performed to identify the categories of metabolites present in the
extracts.
2.1 Materials and Reagents
All the chemicals used were of analytical grade. Ethanol, ethyl acetate, acetic
acid, oxalic acid and ammonium oxalate were purchased from VWR (France). The
3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), rutin,
lycopene, -carotene and standard compounds used for identification and
quantification were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and Extrasynthese.
Cellulase, pectinase, 15-lipoxygenase, -amylase
and -glucosidase were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (France).
Acetonitrile (ACN), Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), dimethylsulfoxide
(DMSO) and Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI) were also obtained from
Sigma Aldrich (France). The reagents 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH),
aluminum trichloride (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethyl chroma-2-carboxylic acid),
and Trolox were obtained from Alfa Aesar (France).
2.2 Preparation and Pretreatment of the Tomato Pomace
Fresh tomato pomace was supplied by the “Les Jus du Soleil” cooperative
(Marmande, France). Tomato pomace was oven-dried at 50 °C during 8 hours
to obtain dried tomato waste (DTW). The residual moisture content of the raw
material after drying was 2%. Before extraction, the DTW was ground with an
electric grinder to obtain particles between 1 and 2 mm in diameter (measured on
optical microscopy, magnification 10). Some samples were subjected to
a pretreatment before the mixing of the DTW with a solvent. The pretreatment was
designed to hydrolyze polyesters and polysaccharides, so as to facilitate the
release of metabolites during extraction.
For chemical pretreatment, we used the oxidizing solution described by
Grassino et al. [26]. We added 16 g f DTW to a mixture of 100 mL oxalate
ammonium solution (16 g/L) and 100 mL oxalic acid solution (4 g/L). The resulting
mixture was stirred at 90 °C for 7 hours and then filtered through a
Büchner funnel. The filtrate was retained for subsequent pectin extraction.
The solid residue was dried in an oven at 30 °C for 8 hours before
extraction.
Pretreatment by enzymatic catalysis was performed by a method adapted from that
of Choudhari et al. [27]. We prepared 20 mL buffer solution (0.2 mol/L)
at pH 4.5 from 0.18 g acetic acid and 0.164 g sodium acetate, with stirring for 3
minutes. We dissolved 5 mg of enzyme (5 mg of cellulase or 5 mg of a 50:50
mixture of pectinase and cellulase) in 1 mL of buffer solution with stirring for
2 min. The enzyme preparation was then added to 3 g DTW and incubated for 15
minutes at either 55 °C (for cellulase) or 65 °C for the
cellulase/pectinase mixture. The solid material was filtered with a Büchner
funnel, washed and dried for 8 hours at 40 °C.
2.3 Extraction by Cold Maceration
The material (with or without chemical pretreatment) was placed in 100 mL
solvent (ethyl acetate, ethanol, a 1:1 combination of ethyl acetate and ethanol
or a 1:1 mixture of ethanol and water) and stirred at room temperature for 24
hours. The solid material was collected by filtration and the solvent was
evaporated off under a vacuum.
Material that had been subjected to enzymatic pretreatment was placed in 30 mL
solvent (ethyl acetate or ethanol) and stirred at room temperature for 24 hours.
The solid material was recovered by filtration and washed, and the solvent was
evaporated off under a vacuum.
Extraction yields, expressed as a% (w/w) of dry weight (d.w.), were calculated
as follows:
(1)
2.4 Extraction with SC-CO
Extraction was performed in a supercritical fluid unit in accordance with
Directive 97/23/EC. This apparatus consisted of a 0.22 L extraction vessel, a
0.22 L separator, a pneumatic pump, and two thermostatic baths at 40 °C.
For each experiment, 15 g ground tomato pomace (particles of 2–3 mm in diameter)
was loaded into the extractor. The CO flow rate was set to 80 g/min at a
pressure of 200 bars. The extraction was stopped when the weight of the material
collected from separator became stable.
2.5 Determination of the Bioactive Agent Composition of Extracts
2.5.1 Total Phenolic Content (TPC)
The total polyphenol content of extracts was determined with Folin-Ciocalteu
reagent with a modified version of the protocol described by Papoutsis et
al. [28]. We placed 1 mL dry extract (1 mg/mL ethanol) in a 6 mL tube, followed
by 0.5 mL of 10% (w/v) Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. The tube was gently shaken for 5
minutes, and we then added 1.5 mL of 2% sodium carbonate solution. The mixture
was stirred manually and incubated in the dark at room temperature for 30
minutes. The reaction was stopped by immersing the tubes in a cold bath for 20
minutes. A blank was prepared in a similar manner, but with the extract replaced
with ethanol. Absorbance was measured at 760 nm with a UVD 1800 spectrophotometer
(Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Gallic acid was used as a standard for the preparation
of a calibration curve, with concentrations between 0.01 and 0.20 g/L. The
solutions of gallic acid at different concentrations were mixed with
Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and subjected to the protocol described for aliquots of
the extracts. The results are expressed in mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per
gram of extract (mg GAE/g extract).
2.5.2 Total Flavonoid Content (TFC)
The flavonoid content of extracts was determined according to a modified version
of the aluminum chloride method described by Quettier-Deleu et al. [29].
We placed 1 mL of diluted extract (1 mg/mL in ethanol) or 1 mL of a standard
solution of rutin in a flask, to which 1 mL of a 2% solution of aluminum
chloride in methanol was added. The contents of the flask were mixed and
incubated in the dark for 1 hour at room temperature. The absorbance of samples
at 415 nm was measured with a UVD 1800 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto,
Japan). We used 1 mL of solvent (ethanol) with 1 mL of 2% aluminum chloride in
methanol as the blank for sample reading. A calibration curve was prepared with
rutin as the standard, at concentrations of 0.005 to 0.090 g/L. Aliquots of rutin
solution were mixed with aluminum chloride solution, and the protocol described
above was followed. Flavonoid concentration is expressed in milligrams of rutin
equivalent (RE) per gram of extract (mg RE/g extract).
2.5.3 Total Carotenoid Content (TCC)
A UV 1800 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) was used to estimate total
carotenoid content by measuring absorbance at 446 nm in a quartz cell with a path
length of 1 cm. A wavelength of 471 nm was used for lycopene determinations, and
a wavelength of 400 nm was used for -carotene determinations. Dried
extract (0.1 g) was dissolved in 50 mL ethanol and ultrasonicated for 1 minute.
Two calibration curves were plotted from the absorbances measured at 400 and 471
nm for the solutions prepared with concentrations of 0.027 to 0.150 g/mL
-carotene and lycopene in ethanol. Moreover, total carotenoid content
were determined by measuring absorbance at 446 nm and is expressed in mg of
-carotene equivalent per gram of extract.
2.6 Determination of the Biological Activity of Extracts
2.6.1 Determination of Antioxidant Activity with DPPH
The antioxidant activity of the extracts was assessed by determining their free
radical scavenging activity against 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryldrazyl (DPPH), as
described by Brand-Williams [30]. We dissolved 5 mg DPPH in 100 mL ethanol to
obtain an absorbance of DPPH at 516 nm between 0.9 and 1.1. Extracts were diluted
in ethanol to obtain concentrations of 500 g/mL. We added a 150
L aliquot of each extract and 150 L of 50
g/mL DPPH in ethanol to the wells of a 96-well microplate. The
plate was kept in the dark for 40 minutes, with mixing by gentle rotation every 5
minutes. Absorbance was read at 516 nm with a spectrophotometer (Spectrostar, BMG
Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany). Percent inhibition was calculated as follows:
(2)
where A is the absorption in the presence of the extract, and A is the
absorption of the solution obtained by mixing 150 L of DPPH solution
with 150 L of ethanol.
2.6.2 Antidiabetic Activity
The ability of extracts to inhibit -glucosidase activity was estimated
in a modified version of the assay described by Oueslati et al. [31]. We
used p-nitrophenyl--D-glucopyranoside (PNPG) as the substrate for this
experiment. Various solutions of the extracts at different concentrations were
prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). In brief, 50 L of the extract
tested (250 g/mL in DMSO) was mixed with 100 L of the enzyme
solution (1 U/mL -glucosidase in phosphate buffer (pH 6.9)) and 50
L phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH = 6.9). The mixture was incubated for
10 minutes at 25 °C, and 50 L PNPG solution (5 mM in phosphate
buffer, pH = 6.9) was added to the mixture (1% DMSO), which was then incubated
for 5 minutes at 25 °C. Absorbance at 405 nm was measured in 96-well
microplates with a Thermo Fisher Scientific Multiskan GO Microplate
Spectrophotometer (Vantaa, Finland). Measurements were performed three times.
Acarbose, an inhibitor of -glucosidase, was used as a positive control.
The percent inhibition (%) reflects the ability of the extract to inhibit
-glucosidase activity and was calculated as follows:
(3)
where A is the absorbance (405 nm) of the control prepared with 100
L potassium phosphate buffer (replacing -glucosidase) and
A is the absorbance (405 nm) in the presence of the extract.
Inhibitory activity is expressed as the IC (g/mL),
corresponding to the concentration required to inhibit the enzymatic hydrolysis
(by -glucosidase) of the p-nitrophenyl--D-glucopyranoside
substrate by 50%.
The ability of extracts to inhibit -amylase activity was estimated by
a modified version of the DNS method described by Saidi et al. [32].
Each extract was dissolved in a minimum amount of DMSO and diluted in sodium
phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 6.9). The concentration of DMSO in the mixture did
not exceed 1%. Diluted extract (50 L of a 250 g/mL
dilution) was added to 50 L of -amylase solution (3 mg/5 mL of
the same buffer). Samples were incubated for 15 minutes at 25 °C, and
100 L starch solution (1% in buffer) was then added. The mixture was
incubated at 25 °C for 3 minutes and was then mixed with 100 L
3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) solution. The reaction tube was placed in a
boiling water bath for 10 minutes and was then cooled to room temperature, before
the addition of 1 mL sodium phosphate buffer. Absorbance was measured at 540 nm
in triplicate in 96-well plates with a Thermo Fisher Scientific Multiskan
GO Microplate Spectrophotometer (Vantaa, Finland). Acarbose (1.3 mg/mL), an
inhibitor of -amylase, was used as a positive control. The percent
inhibition (%) of -amylase was calculated as follows:
(4)
where A is the absorbance (540 nm) of the control prepared with 100
L potassium phosphate buffer in place of -amylase,
A is the absorbance (540 nm) in the presence of the extract. The
concentration of the compound providing 50% inhibition (IC in
g/mL) was calculated by plotting percent inhibition against sample
concentrations.
2.6.3 Anti-Inflammatory Activity
The anti-inflammatory activity of extracts was determined with 15-lipoxygenase
(15-LOX), as described by Khelifi et al. [33], but with some
modifications. In brief, 20 L extract (250 g/mL) was
mixed with 150 L sodium phosphate buffer (pH = 7.4), 20
L 15-lipoxygenase and 60 L linoleic acid (3.5 mM) as
a substrate. For the blank, the substrate was replaced with 60 L
buffer. Then, the mixture was incubated at 25 °C for 10 minutes and
absorbance at 234 nm was measured in 96-well microplates with a Thermo Fisher
Scientific Multiskan GO Microplate Spectrophotometer (Vantaa, Finland).
Measurements were performed three times. Nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA) at a
concentration of 0.5 mg/mL was used as a positive control. The following equation
was used to calculate the percent inhibition:
(5)
where A is the absorbance (234 nm) of the reaction mixture when the
extract is replaced with potassium phosphate buffer and A is the
absorbance (234 nm) in the presence of the extract.
2.6.4 Cell Viability Assay with HCT-116 Cells
This test is based on the reduction of MTT (a yellow water-soluble tetrazolium
salt) by the mitochondrial dehydrogenase of intact cells to generate purple
formazan. The anti-proliferation activity of the extracts against HCT-116 cells
(a human colon cancer cell line) was estimated with a modified version of the
protocol described by Dawra et al. [34]. The cells were purchased from
ATCC, and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium at 37 °C in a humidified
incubator (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Illkirch, France) under an atmosphere
containing 5% CO. The HCT-116 cells were dispensed in a 96-well
microplate, with 3 10 cells/well, in 100 L of appropriate
culture medium, and were incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C. The test
compounds were suspended in DMSO and diluted to obtain solutions with a DMSO
concentration below 1%. The microplate was incubated at 37 °C for 48
hours. The supernatant was then removed, 20 L of MTT solution was added to
each well and the plates were incubated for a further 40 minutes. The MTT reagent
was removed and 80 L DMSO was added to dissolve the formazan crystals.
Absorbance was measured at 605 nm with a microplate reader (Multiskan GO,
F1-01620, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vantaa, Finland). Measurements were performed
three times. Tamoxifen at a concentration of 100 M was used as a positive
control. The percent inhibition of cellular activity was calculated as follows:
(6)
A is the absorbance of the cell suspension without the extract.
2.6.5 Flow Cytometry Assay
For flow cytometry, the A549 cells were cultured in 96-well plates and infected
with ZIKV, in the presence or absence of extracts, for 24 hours at a
multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1. The cells were then treated with trypsin
and fixed by incubation with 3.7% PFA for 15 minutes. The cells were then subjected
to a flow cytometry analysis in a Cytoflex machine (Beckman, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA).
The results were analyzed with cytexpert software
2.7 High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Analysis (HPLC-DAD)
HPLC analyses were performed with a Thermo Fisher Scientific Spectra System
P1000XR pump equipped with a Diode Array Detector (Waters, Massachusetts, 996). Separation was
achieved on an RPC18 reverse-phase column (Phenomenex, Le Pecq, France) of 25 cm
4.6 mm in size, with a particle size of 5 m. Elution was
performed at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min, with a mobile phase consisting of
acidified water at pH 2.6 (solvent A), and acidified water:acetonitrile (20:80
v/v) (solvent B). The samples were eluted with the following linear gradient:
from 12% B to 30% B over a period of 35 minutes, from 30% B to 50% B over a
period of 5 minutes, from 50% B to 88% B over a period of 5 minutes and,
finally, from 88% B to 12% B over a period of 15 minutes. The extracts were
prepared at a concentration of 1 mg/mL in acetonitrile and filtered with a
Millex-HA (0.45 m pores) syringe filter (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA). We
injected 20 L of each sample onto the column and detection was
registered at 280 nm. The compounds were identified on the basis of their
retention times (RT) and spectral characteristics relative to standards.
2.8 Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as the mean standard deviation. Statistical analysis
was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with Duncan’s multiple
range test to compare means displaying significant variation (p 0.05).
Statistical tests for antiviral activities were performed with Prism software
(version 9.0; GraphPad software, La Jola, CA, USA).
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Extraction Methods
Several fractions were isolated from DTW as described in Fig. 1. The ability of
pretreatment to enrich the extract in metabolites was assessed. This step
involved contact between the DTW and enzymes or an oxidative medium. But, this
preliminary step could also potentially lead to a degradation or loss of some
metabolites.
The chemical pretreatment was based on hydrolysis in an oxalic acid/sodium
oxalate buffer. Grassino et al. [11] applied this pretreatment to TP
before precipitating the pectins in the filtrate, by adding ethanol. Ecofriendly
solvents (ethanol, ethyl acetate, and ethanol:water and ethanol:ethyl acetate
mixtures) of various polarities were used to prepare several extracts by
maceration. These biobased solvents were selected not only on the basis of their
low toxicities, but also for their moderate boiling points (100 °C),
to limit the energy required for separation by distillation. Carotenoids have a
higher affinity for lipophilic solvents, whereas polyphenols are better extracted
in protic polar solvents. Ethanol and water can induce the swelling of cellulose,
which may improve the release of metabolites. We chose to perform macerations at
room temperature, to save energy and for ease of implementation. Extracts were
also prepared with SC-CO, a method that usually efficiently extracts lipids
and low-polarity molecules, such as carotenoids, whilst avoiding the need for a
solvent separation step.
Extraction yields (Fig. 2) ranged from 1.2% to 5.0%. A yield of 5.0% was
obtained with SC-CO after 100 minutes of extraction at 80 g/min CO
and 200 bars. Increasing the pressure to 250 bars did not increase the yield. We
therefore kept the pressure at 200 bars. Furthermore, finer grinding (particles
2–3 mm) did not improve extraction yield, probably due to the formation of
channels described by Strati et al. [14]. Maceration in an ethanol and
water mixture resulted in a yield of 4.4% yield. Chemical pretreatment increased
the extraction yield obtained in ethyl acetate, by improving the release of
lipophilic metabolites. The enzymatic pretreatment also tended to increase the
yield obtained after maceration in ethanol, with the measured yields increasing
from 3.1 to 3.7%. Successive macerations in ethyl acetate and then in ethanol
resulted in the recovery of two fractions from the same sample of TP,
corresponding to a total weight of 5.9 g per 100 g of TP. Finally, maceration in
a mixture of ethyl acetate and ethanol resulted in a slightly higher yield
(3.5%) than was obtained with either of these solvents used separately (3.0 and
3.1%).
Fig. 2.
Extraction yields for the various TP extracts (maceration at 20
°C for 24 hours and with SC-CO at 40 °C and 200 bars). CPT, chemical pretreatment; EPT1, enzymatic pretreatment with cellulase; EPT2,
enzymatic pretreatment with pectinase; EtAc, ethyl acetate. Blue histograms
correspond to extracts obtained after pretreatment, red histograms correspond to
extracts obtained without pretreatment); each value is a mean of five replicates,
columns with the same letters are not significantly different (p
0.05).
3.2 Total Phenolic and Flavonoid Contents
The total flavonoid contents (TFC) and total phenolic content (TPC) were
determined for the extracts (Figs. 3,4). Both these contents were highest for
extracts in ethanol (99.5 mg RE/g extract and 99.8 mg GAE/g extract,
respectively), or the ethanol:water mixture (93.2 mg RE/g and 93.0 mg GAE/g,
respectively). The extract prepared with SC-CO was also rich in phenolic
compounds (87.6 mg GAE/g) but had a lower flavonoid content than the extract
obtained with ethanol (33.6 mg RE/g). For extracts obtained with ethyl acetate,
enzymatic pretreatment increased the content of both polyphenols (up to 86.2 mg
GAE/g) and flavonoids (42.2 mg RE/g) relative to the extract obtained with ethyl
acetate in the absence of pretreatment. Nour et al. [12] found 1.2 mg
GAE/g pomace and 0.4 mg RE/g pomace with an extraction in methanol with
sonication. For the macerations performed in ethanol, the calculated values in
mg/g TP are 3.09 mg GAE/g DW and 3.08 mg RE/g DW, showing that ethanol appears to
be a suitable solvent to obtain these two categories of metabolites by
maceration.
Fig. 3.
Total flavonoid content in TP extracts (obtained by maceration
at 20 °C for 24 hours and with SC-CO at 40 °C with 80 g
CO/min). Extracts were tested at 1 mg/mL. CPT, chemical pre-treatment;
EPT1, enzymatic pretreatment with cellulase; EPT2, enzymatic pretreatment with
pectinase; EtAc, ethyl acetate. Blue histograms correspond to extracts obtained
after pretreatment, red histograms correspond to extracts obtained without
pretreatment; columns with the same letters are not significantly
different (p 0.05).
Fig. 4.
Total polyphenol content in TP extracts (obtained by maceration
at 20 °C for 24 hours and with SC-CO at 40 °C and 200
bars). Extracts were tested at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. CPT, chemical
pretreatment; EPT1, enzymatic pretreatment with cellulase; EPT2, enzymatic
pretreatment with pectinase; EtAc, ethyl acetate. Blue histograms correspond to
extracts obtained after pretreatment. Red histograms correspond to extracts
obtained without pretreatment, columns with the same letters are not
significantly different (p 0.05).
3.3 Total Carotenoid Content
The total carotenoid content determined by UV spectrophotometry is presented in
Fig. 5. Extracts prepared by maceration in ethyl acetate after chemical
pretreatment had the highest total carotenoid content, and the highest contents
of lycopene (60.1 mg/g extract corresponding to 2.4 mg/g DTW) and
-carotene (128.2 mg/g extract) (Figs. 6,7).
Fig. 5.
Total carotenoid content of TP extracts (obtained by maceration
at 20 °C for 24 hours or with SC-CO at 40 °C and 200
bars). CPT, chemical pretreatment; EPT1, enzymatic pretreatment with cellulase;
EPT2, enzymatic pretreatment with pectinase; EtAc, ethyl acetate. Blue histograms
correspond to extracts obtained with pretreatment. Red histograms correspond to
extracts obtained without pretreatment, columns with the same letters are not
significantly different (p 0.05).
Fig. 6.
Total -carotene content of TP extracts (obtained by
maceration at 20 °C for 24 hours or with SC-CO at 40 °C
and 200 bars). CPT, chemical pretreatment; EPT1, enzymatic pretreatment with
cellulase; EPT2, enzymatic pretreatment with pectinase; EtAc, ethyl acetate. Blue
histograms correspond to extracts obtained with pretreatment; red histograms
correspond to extracts obtained without pretreatment), columns with the same
letters are not significantly different (p 0.05).
Fig. 7.
Total lycopene content of TP extracts (obtained by maceration at
20 °C for 24 hours or with SC-CO at 40 °C and 200 bars).
CPT, chemical pretreatment; EPT1, enzymatic pretreatment with cellulase; EPT2,
enzymatic pretreatment with pectinase; EtAc, ethyl acetate. Blue histograms
correspond to extracts obtained with pretreatment. Red histograms correspond to
extracts obtained directly from the dried tomato waste (i.e., without
pretreatment), columns with at the same letters are not significantly different
(p 0.05).
The extraction yield of lycopene obtained in these conditions was greater than
that (1.33 mg/g DTW) reported by Silva et al. [35] and Szabo et
al. [36] for an extraction of TP with a mixture of ethyl acetate and ethyl
lactate activated by ultrasound (63 °C, 100 mL/g). In addition,
enzymatic pretreatment applied prior to ethyl acetate maceration was more
effective to release lycopene (55.8 mg/g extract) compared to the case when it
was coupled to ethanolic maceration (12.6 mg lycopene/g extract). The rates of
lycopene (56 mg/g extract) and ß-caroten (82 mg/g extract) obtained in
SC-CO extract were greater than that obtained at higher pressures tested by
Lenucci et al. [37]. Effective extractions can be thus achieved at
moderate flows and pressures, justifying the selection of this process for the
development of a tomato waste biorefinery [38].
3.4 Radical Scavenging Activity
The radical scavenging activity of each extract was expressed as a percentage
inhibition in Fig. 8. The highest antioxidant activities (69.7% and 71.6% of
inhibition) were detected for extracts obtained with ethanol:water and ethanol,
samples which correspond to the highest contents in polyphenols and carotenoids.
The extract prepared with SC-CO also showed interesting antioxidant
properties which can be attributed to its contents in polyphenols and lycopene.
The contribution of methanolic fraction from fresh tomatoes, to the total
antioxidant activity was clearly higher compared to that of lipophilic fractions
obtained in hexane according to Lenucci et al. [39]. Promising
antioxidant properties (around 300 mg TE/100 g of TP) were also found from
ethanolic fraction of TP, isolated after the elimination of non-polar compounds
in hexane [40]. Cetkovic et al. [41] suggested that the antioxidant
activity of ethanolic extracts was due to effective scavenging of hydroxyl and
superoxide anion radicals.
Fig. 8.
DPPH radical scavenging activity of TP extracts (tested at 1
mg/mL) obtained by maceration at 20 °C for 24 hours or with SC-CO at 40 °C and 200 bars. CPT, chemical pretreatment; EPT1, enzymatic
pretreatment with cellulase; EPT2, enzymatic pretreatment with pectinase; EtAc,
ethyl acetate. Blue histograms correspond to extracts obtained with pretreatment.
Red histograms correspond to extracts obtained without pretreatment, columns with
the same letters are not significantly different (p 0.05).
3.5 HPLC-DAD Analyses
The analyses described above showed that it was possible, in the extraction
conditions used, to preserve heat-sensitive molecules and to obtain extracts with
variable carotenoid, polyphenol and flavonoid contents. The enzymatic
pretreatment enhanced the polyphenol and flavonoid contents of the ethyl acetate
fraction, resulting in higher levels of antioxidant activity. Successive
extractions (i.e., ethanol after ethyl acetate) generated a final
extract richer in carotenoids. SC-CO extract was rich in lycopene, molecule
which also contributed to its antioxidant activity.
HPLC-DAD analyses were used to determine the composition of the extracts more
precisely (Table 1) and for instance to detect ascorbic acid as an antioxidant
substance. HPLC on the ethyl acetate extract obtained after chemical pretreatment
revealed the presence of rutin hydrate, kaempferol, tannins and derivatives of
p-hydroxy benzoic acid, together with high levels of carotenoids.
Enzymatic pretreatment (with a mixture of two enzymes) enriched the ethanolic
fraction in tannins, lycopene, isoquercitrine and specific phenol acids (sinapic
acid, ferulic acid). Extraction in an ethanol ethyl acetate mixture resulted in
higher levels of tannins and phenolic acids in the resulting extract than were
obtained with ethanol alone. As for the ethanol-water mixture, overall
composition was similar to that for the ethanol extract, with similar levels of
antioxidant activity, but a lower carotenoid content. In the ethanol fraction
obtained after maceration in ethyl acetate were detected rutin hydrate and
trihydroxyethylrutin, as well as naringinin. Finally, the extract obtained with
SC-CO contained polyphenols (including phenolic acid), carotenoids
(lycopene in particular) and trihydroxyethylrutin (a flavonoid) and tannin (a
cinnamic acid ester).
Table 1.Identification of molecules in extracts from tomato pomace by
HPLC-DAD.
No. |
RT (min) |
Compound |
With pretreatment (area, in AU) |
Without pretreatment (area, in AU) |
EPT1 + ethanol |
EPT1 + EPT2 + ethanol |
CPT + EtAc |
Ethanol |
Ethanol + water |
Ethanol after EtAc |
Ethanol + EtAc |
EtAc |
SC-CO |
1 |
2.2 |
3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoic acid |
2.6 |
9.5 |
- |
2.8 |
- |
12.3 |
18.7 |
1.9 |
- |
2 |
2.81 |
ascorbic acid |
- |
15.6 |
0.2 |
13.3 |
26.0 |
14.6 |
45.8 |
6.2 |
- |
3 |
4.1 |
gallic acid |
- |
- |
0.1 |
- |
‘ |
- |
7.9 |
|
|
4 |
7.66 |
hamamelitannin |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.6 |
4.4 |
- |
- |
5 |
9.88 |
chlorogenic acid |
0.8 |
4.9 |
- |
4.5 |
2.8 |
1.4 |
11.8 |
- |
4.8 |
6 |
11.97 |
epicatechin (flavonol) |
- |
2.3 |
- |
1.7 |
- |
- |
6.5 |
- |
- |
7 |
12.9 |
caffeic acid |
|
1.2 |
- |
- |
1.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
15.3 |
2,4 dihydroxy cinnamic acid |
- |
3.1 |
- |
1.6 |
- |
1.1 |
4.6 |
4.6 |
- |
9 |
18.07 |
6-hydroxycoumarine |
|
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
10 |
19.15 |
3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid methyl ester |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.7 |
- |
- |
- |
11 |
19.88 |
7-hydroxycoumarin-3-carboxylic acid |
1.2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
12 |
20.94 |
ferulic acid |
- |
2.8 |
- |
1.1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
13 |
21.19 |
coumaric acid |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.6 |
3.4 |
2.1 |
- |
14 |
22.74 |
rutin hydrate |
- |
- |
1.7 |
- |
- |
5.1 |
- |
- |
- |
15 |
23.56 |
sinapic acid |
- |
3.6 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5.1 |
2.9 |
- |
16 |
25.94 |
isoquercitrin (flavonoid glucoside) |
- |
4.8 |
- |
0.8 |
1.1 |
- |
12.3 |
- |
- |
17 |
27.41 |
trihydroxyethylrutin |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2.4 |
- |
- |
14.2 |
18 |
39.89 |
salvianolic acid B |
0.5 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2.5 |
- |
- |
19 |
41.56 |
7,3- dihydroxyflavone |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
6.5 |
1.3 |
- |
20 |
42.78 |
5,7-dihydroxy-4-propylcoumarin (tannin) |
- |
3.6 |
- |
- |
1.6 |
- |
7.9 |
- |
- |
21 |
44.28 |
5,6,7-trihydroxyflavone (baicalein) |
- |
24.3 |
3.4 |
5.8 |
3.5 |
11.9 |
45.4 |
36.7 |
- |
22 |
45.34 |
naringenin (flavanone) |
9.7 |
- |
- |
– |
|
6.0 |
- |
- |
- |
23 |
46.18 |
kaempferol (flavonol) |
- |
- |
24.2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
24 |
46.98 |
cinnamyl-3,4-dihydroxy--cyanocinnamate (tannin) |
- |
- |
20.0 |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
13.9 |
25 |
47.54 |
3,7-dimethoxyflavone |
- |
10.8 |
- |
6.6 |
5.0 |
7.5- |
- |
- |
- |
26 |
47.56 |
3,3′-dimethoxyflavone |
8.5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
7.9 |
- |
27 |
48.5 |
5-hydroxyflavone |
- |
7.7 |
- |
4.2 |
3.7 |
3.4 |
7.3 |
- |
- |
28 |
49.54 |
b-carotene |
3.0 |
- |
77.7 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
82.1 |
29 |
50.12 |
lycopene |
- |
4.2 |
124.5 |
- |
- |
- |
7.7 |
10.7 |
66.8 |
30 |
50.47 |
lutein |
- |
0.4 |
- |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4.0 |
3.6 Biological Activities
The biological activities of the extracts with the greatest bioactive molecule
contents were assessed. We analyzed nine extracts by HPLC (Table 1).
3.6.1 Antidiabetic Activity
We used the -glucosidase and -amylase enzymes to assess
antidiabetic activity. Acarbose, an -glucosidase inhibitor prescribed
for the treatment of diabetes, was used as a positive control. It has an
IC of 48.8 g/mL for these two enzymes. The percent inhibition of
-glucosidase and -amylase achieved with the various extracts
is presented in Figs. 9,10. These extracts clearly outperformed the positive
control (with IC = 15.1 and 8.7 g/mL for anti
-glucosidase and -amylase activities, respectively), probably
due to synergy between the various molecules present in the extracts.
Fig. 9.
Anti--glucosidase activity of TP extracts (tested at
250 g/mL) obtained by maceration at 20 °C for 24 hours or with
SC-CO at 40 °C and 200 bars. CPT, chemical pretreatment; EPT1,
enzymatic pretreatment with cellulase; EPT2, enzymatic pretreatment with
pectinase; EtAc, ethyl acetate. Blue histograms correspond to extracts obtained
with pretreatment; Red histograms correspond to extracts obtained without
pretreatment, columns with at the same letters are not significantly
different (p 0.05).
Fig. 10.
Anti--amylase activity of TP extracts (tested at 250
g/mL) obtained by maceration at 20 °C for 24 hours or with
SC-CO at 40 °C and 200 bars. CPT, chemical pretreatment; EPT1,
enzymatic pretreatment with cellulase; EPT2, enzymatic pretreatment with
pectinase; EtAc, ethyl acetate. Blue histograms correspond to extracts obtained
with pretreatment. Red histograms correspond to extracts obtained without
pretreatment), columns with the same letters are not significantly different
(p 0.05).
The extract obtained with the ethanol:water (50:50) mixture yielded the lowest
IC values (5.9 and 4.9 g/mL). This extract contains flavones
(molecules 21, 25 and 26) and phenolic acids (molecules 1, 5 and 7), which are
known to have antidiabetic activity. The contribution of 5,7-dihydroxy-4-propyl
coumarin (molecule 20) to several biological activities has been investigated
with African mustard extracts [42]. In their review, Khalid Al-Ishaq et
al. [43] described the antidiabetic activity of flavonoids, including flavones,
together with their mechanism of action. Gheonea et al. [17] also
reported an inhibitory effect (79.9%) against -amylase for
lycopene extracted from tomato skin at a concentration 8.5 mg/mL.
3.6.2 Evaluation of Anti-Inflammatory Activity
Nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA) was used as a positive control in the
15-lipoxygenase (15-LOX) inhibition assays, with an IC of 4
g/mL. The IC values of the extracts ranged from 9.3 to 12.3
g/mL (Fig. 11), indicating clear activity against 15-lipoxygenase
whatever the solvent used for extraction. The extract obtained with ethyl acetate
after chemical pretreatment had one of the lowest IC values recorded
(i.e., 9.3). Kaempferol (molecule 23),
cinnamyl-3,4-dihydroxy--cyanocinnamate (molecule 24) and rutin hydrate
(molecule 14) are probably involved in this bioactivity, as all these molecules
have already been reported to have anti-inflammatory properties. Devi et
al. [44] described the mechanisms of action of kaempferol, and Pergola
et al. [45] showed that molecule 24 is a potent inhibitor of 5-LO that
is effective in vivo.
Fig. 11.
Anti-inflammatory activity of TP extracts (tested at 250
g/mL)against the 15-lipoxygenase enzyme, after maceration at 20
°C for 24 hours or with SC-CO at 40 °C and 200
bars. CPT, chemical pretreatment; EPT1, enzymatic pretreatment with
cellulase; EPT2, enzymatic pretreatment with pectinase; EtAc, ethyl acetate. Blue
histograms correspond to extracts obtained with pretreatment. Red histograms
correspond to extracts obtained without pretreatment, columns with the same
letters are not significantly different (p 0.05).
Based on recent data from in vitro studies, Maleki et al.
[46] highlighted the possibility that different subclasses of flavonoids
(including rutin hydrate) might modulate different stages of inflammation,
thereby playing key roles in diseases such as diabetes, asthma, cardiovascular
diseases and cancer. Finally, the phenolic acids present in the ethanol-based
extracts have also been described as potent inhibitors of 15-lipoxygenase [47, 48].
3.6.3 Cytotoxicity against Tumor Cell Lines
The cytotoxicity of extracts (50 g/mL) was evaluated against a
variant HCT 116 tumor cell line (Fig. 12). Tamoxifene (100 M), used
as a positive control, gave 93% growth inhibition. The SC-CO extract had a
clear anticancer effect, yielding 64.5% inhibition. Four other extracts in
ethanol had a moderate anticancer effect, with inhibition rates between 31% and
37%. These four extracts had high total polyphenol contents (Fig. 4), with high
levels of chlorogenic acid (molecule 5) and several flavones in common. Their
activities may be linked to several molecules previously reported to have
anticancer properties. Trihydroxethylrutin (molecule 17), used in a pure state,
has been shown to be an effective inhibitor of the growth of HCT-116 cells [33].
Chlorogenic acid extracted from decaffeinated coffee beans was found to be
cytotoxic in the MTT test on HCT 116 cancer cells, with an IC of 0.84
mg/mL [49]. Lycopene (molecule 29) increased the inhibition of HCT116 cell growth
by 58.3% when used at a concentration of 100 g/mL [50]. Moreover,
5,6,7-trihydroxyflavone (i.e., baicalein, molecule 21) extracted from
the fruits of Oroxylum indicum, widely used in traditional Chinese
herbal medicine for its anti-inflammatory properties, inhibited the growth of HL
60 cells by 50% at concentrations of 25 to 30 mM [51]. Flavones from tomato skin
have also been reported to have inhibitory activity against SCC 9 human oral
cancer cells [52, 53].
Fig. 12.
Cytotoxic activity of TP extracts (tested at 50
g/mL) against HCT 116 cancer cell lines, after maceration at 20
°C for 24 hours or with SC-CO at 40 °C and 200 bars.
CPT, chemical pretreatment; EPT1, enzymatic pretreatment with cellulase; EPT2,
enzymatic pretreatment with pectinase; EtAc, ethyl acetate. Blue histograms
correspond to extracts obtained with pretreatment. Red histograms correspond to
extracts obtained without pretreatment, columns with the same letters are not
significantly different (p 0.05).
3.6.4 Evaluation of Antiviral Activity against ZIKV in Vitro
The potential antiviral activities of the six extracts prepared without TP
pretreatment were investigated against Zika virus (ZIKV), a mosquito-borne
enveloped arbovirus from the Flavivirus genus that constitutes a major
health burden, due to the diverse human cells it can infect [54]. For this assay,
human A549 cells were infected with ZIKV carrying a reporter gene encoding green
fluorescent protein (GFP) [55] for 24 hours in the presence or absence of various
nontoxic concentrations of the extracts. The concentrations inhibiting infection
by 50% were determined. The results of antiviral activity assays are presented
in Fig. 13.
Fig. 13.
Extracts display antiviral activity against ZIKV. (A) A549
cells were incubated with two-fold serial dilutions (400 to 6.25
g/mL) of plant extracts for 24 hours. Cellular mitochondrial
activity was evaluated in an MTT assay. (B) A549 cells were infected with
ZIKV at an MOI of 1 in the presence of different concentrations of
extracts. Flow cytometry analysis of GFP fluorescence was performed 24 hours
post-infection. (C) Schematic representation of time-of-drug-addition assays used
to characterize the antiviral activity of extracts 1, 3 and 6 (100
g/mL). (D) Flow cytometry analysis of GFP expression in A549 cells
infected with ZIKV for 24 hours at an MOI of 1 under the various
experimental conditions shown in (C). The data shown are the means SD of
four independent experiments performed in triplicate, and are expressed relative
to vehicle-treated/infected cells. Statistical analysis consisted of one-way
ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons with p
0.05 considered significant.
Cellular mitochondrial activities were preserved below 20 g/mL
(Fig. 13A). Above this concentration, cell viability was conserved for extracts 1
(ethanol) and 4 (ethanol and water), with values of 80–90% at 200
g/mL relative to vehicle-treated control cells. In antiviral
activity assays, extracts 1, 3 and 6 (prepared with ethanol, ethanol:ethyl
acetate and SC-CO, respectively), inhibited ZIKV infection in a
dose-dependent manner at concentrations above 10 g/mL (Fig. 13B).
At a concentration of 200 g/mL these three extracts inhibit ZIKV
infection in human cells up to 75%. Time-of-drug-addition assays (Fig. 13C)
showed that the most active extracts (1, 3 and 6) impeded ZIKV entry into cells
(Fig. 13D). Gaafar et al. [56] showed that an ethanol extract of tomato
pomace (400 g/L) inhibited avian influenza A H5N1 virus by 63%.
The epicatechin (molecule 6) detected in extracts 1 and 3 was described
in the review by Behl et al. [57] as having antiviral activity against
Zika virus. Baicalin (a trihydroxyflavone, molecule 20), which was also detected
in ethanol extracts, has been reported to downregulate ZIKV replication [57, 58].
Isoquercitrin (quercetin-3-O-glucoside, molecule 16), which was detected in
extracts 1, 2 and 3, has been identified as a potent inhibitor of ZIKV in various
cell types of human origin, as this molecule prevent the initiation of host-cell
infection [59]. Some flavonoids have been reported to have anti-Zika virus
activities, and several possible mechanisms of action have been suggested [54, 60]. Finally, hamametannin (molecule 4 in extracts 2 and 3) has been described as
a potential SARS-CoV-2 inhibitor, based on molecular docking data [61]. These
classes of molecules may account for the observed antiviral activities of some TP
extracts against ZIKV. They probably act in synergy, as the ethanolic fraction
obtained after maceration in ethyl acetate, which would have concentrated the
extract in polar molecules only (extract 5), had lower bioactivities.
4. Conclusions
Macerations of TP in the selected green solvents and extractions with
SC-CO conditions led to the isolation of fractions containing cocktails of
preserved molecules. HPLC analysis identified 30 molecules in the various
extracts, including hydroxy/methoxyflavones, phenolic acids, carotenoids and
tannins as the most abundant groups of molecules. Our analyses confirmed that the
choice of solvent and pretreatment determined the selectivity of the extraction
process. Total polyphenol and flavonoid contents showed a significant
contribution to the antioxidant properties of the fractions, with inhibition
rates above 48%. The utility of pretreatment depends on the extraction solvent
used and the properties targeted. Pretreatment is justified in the following
cases. For extractions in ethyl acetate, the chemical pretreatment of TP enhanced
its anti-inflammatory activity, with an IC of 9.3 g/mL,
highlighting the role of carotenoids in regulating the inflammatory process. For
the same extract, enzymatic pretreatment was adapted to increase
antioxidant activity from 37 to 51% inhibition. For ethanol extract,
enzymatic pretreatment tended to enhance cytotoxicity activity against
HCT 116 cells (37% rather than 34.7% inhibition). However, cytotoxicity was
highest for the SC-CO extract, for which 65% inhibition was recorded. In
terms of antidiabetic potential, the ethanol:water extract inhibited
both -amylase and -glucosidase activities with
IC values of 4.9 and 5.9 g/mL, respectively. At non-cytotoxic
concentrations, the ethanol fraction of TP extract showed the highest antiviral
effect against ZIKV with an IC of 75 g/mL. This fraction
acts on the early stages of the viral cycle by blocking viral entry into the host
cell. Furthermore, conditions promoting more selective extraction (extraction in
ethanol after the removal of lipophilic molecules in ethyl acetate) resulted in
only moderate biological properties. This finding suggests that there may be
synergy between some polar and non-polar molecules. Finally, the associations of
metabolites obtained from tomato pomace under mild, ecofriendly conditions have
potential benefits for human health. These fractions could be used without
further fractioning, for formulations of pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals or
cosmetic formulations. Based on these findings, we hope to determine the role of
the matrix (lipids or polysaccharides) in molecule preservation. Moreover,
pretreatments may be of interest for extractions from fresh tomato pomace. We are
currently designing eco-materials for upgrading the residual material from the
TP.
Author Contributions
PDC, OM and AH conceived and designed this study; AJ and PDC performed the
experiments, interpreted the results and wrote the article; JB supervised the
therapeutic assays and HPLC analyses; CEK and JGH supervised the antiviral
assays; PE, PDC and OM revised the article and analyzed the data. All the authors read
and approved the final version.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Acknowledgment
Not applicable.
Funding
This PhD work was supported by the Partnership Hubert Curien (PHC) -CEDRE
Program, grant No. 42232RE.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. OM is serving as one of the
Editorial Board members of this journal. We declare that OM had no involvement in
the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its
peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was
delegated to MI.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.