IMR Press / FBL / Volume 12 / Issue 7 / DOI: 10.2741/2261

Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark (FBL) is published by IMR Press from Volume 26 Issue 5 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Frontiers in Bioscience.

Article
Two-versus one photon excitation laser scanning microscopy: critical importance of excitation wavelength
Show Less
1 Centre for Integrative Physiology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Hugh Robson Building, George Square, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, Scotland, U.K.
2 Centre for Biophotonics, Strathclyde University, Glasgow G4 0NR, Scotland, U.K., 2 current address: Department of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 303 E. Chicago Ave., Chicago 60611-3008, U.S.A.
Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed) 2007, 12(7), 2646–2657; https://doi.org/10.2741/2261
Published: 1 January 2007
Abstract

It is often anticipated that two-photon excitation (TPE) laser scanning microscopy should improve cell survival and tissue penetration relative to conventional one-photon excitation (OPE) confocal scanning laser microscopy (CLSM). However few studies have directly compared live cell imaging using one- vs two-photon laser scanning microscopy. We have used calcein-loaded in situ chondrocytes within cartilage as a model for quantitatively comparing these techniques. TPE reduced photo-bleaching and improved cell viability compared to OPE. Using improved detection sensitivity coupled with increased tissue penetration of the near infra-red TPE laser, it was possible to capture images deeper within the cartilage. However, the advantages of TPE vs OPE were strongly dependent on excitation wavelength. We conclude that optimising TPE conditions is essential for realizing the full benefits of this approach.

Share
Back to top