IMR Press / JIN / Volume 22 / Issue 5 / DOI: 10.31083/j.jin2205121
Open Access Original Research
Cerebellar Peduncle Injuries in Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Show Less
1 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, 42415 Daegu, ‎Republic of Korea
2 Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Eulji University, 13135 Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea
*Correspondence: khg0715@hanmail.net (Hyeok Gyu Kwon)
J. Integr. Neurosci. 2023, 22(5), 121; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.jin2205121
Submitted: 3 March 2023 | Revised: 20 June 2023 | Accepted: 30 June 2023 | Published: 14 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Traumatic Brain Injury)
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: The cerebellum is connected to the brain stem by three pairs of cerebellar peduncles (CPs)—superior (SCP), middle (MCP), and inferior (ICP)—which carry proprioceptive information to regulate movement and maintain balance and posture. Injury or damage to the CPs caused by tumors, infarcts, or traumatic brain injuries (TBI) results in poor coordination and balance problems. Current data on CP-related injuries and their effect on balance control are sparse and restricted to a few case studies. There have been no studies to date that have investigated CP injuries in a large sample of patients with balance problems following a mild TBI. Hence, we investigated CP-related injuries in patients with balance problems following mild TBI using diffusion tensor tractography (DTT). Methods: Twenty-one patients with TBI and 21 normal subjects were recruited for this study. Balance was evaluated using the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS). Three DTT-related parameters—fractional anisotropy (FA), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and fiber number (FN) of the CPs—were measured. Results: The FN values of the SCP and ICP in the patient group were significantly lower than those in the control group (p < 0.05). No significant differences in the FA, ADC, and FN values of the MCP were observed between the patient and control groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Using DTT, we demonstrated injuries to the SCP and ICP in mild TBI patients with balance problems. Our results suggest that DTT could be a useful tool for detecting injuries to the CPs that may not be identified on conventional brain magnetic resonance imaging in mild TBI patients.

Keywords
balance
cerebellar peduncles
cerebellum
diffusion tensor tractography
mild traumatic brain injury
1. Introduction

The cerebellum plays a crucial role in the regulation of movement and maintenance of balance and posture. In addition to its well-defined role in motor coordination, there is increasing evidence that the cerebellum contributes to several cognitive features and emotional control [1, 2, 3]. The three cerebellar peduncles (CPs), which connect the cerebellum to the brain stem and cerebrum, are involved in motor control and carry somatosensory information, such as that involved with proprioception (the body’s ability to sense movement, action, and location), and vestibular information (the sense of balance and information about body position) [1, 2, 3]. The superior cerebellar peduncles (SCPs) are paired (afferent and efferent) tracts that connect the cerebellum to the mid-brain containing the red nucleus and the ventrolateral thalamus involved in motor control and continue to the cerebral cortex via the thalamocortical pathway [4]. They carry vestibular information and proprioceptive inputs for motor control [4]. The middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP) contains only the afferent tract connecting the pontine nucleus to the cerebellum and is associated with higher cognitive and motor-sensory functions, thereby modulating skilled movements [4]. The inferior cerebellar peduncle (ICP) has four afferent tracts and one efferent tract connecting the spinal cord to the cerebellum [4]. It integrates somatosensory information, including the proprioceptive and motor vestibular inputs for balance and posture maintenance [4], for motor control, such as motor coordination, balance control, and gait, and other types of skilled movements [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Injuries to the CPs caused by tumors, infarcts, and traumatic brain injury (TBI) can result in loss of motor control [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14].

Traumatic brain injury is a broad term that describes a vast array of injuries from focal to diffuse and is a major cause of functional disabilities such as motor weakness, imbalance [15, 16]. Studies have reported that TBIs to the medial lemniscus and cerebellum are associated with poor balance [17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. Caeyenberghs et al. (2012) [19] demonstrated that lower connectivity between the cerebellum and parietal gyrus was significantly correlated with poor balance in young patients with traumatic axonal injury (TAI). In terms of severity, TBI is classified into three types: mild, moderate, and severe [23]. Mild TBI accounts for 70–85% of all TBIs [23, 24]. While loss of balance and stability is a common physical symptom following mild TBI, it is difficult to detect the lesion using conventional brain computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [25, 26]. However, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) makes it possible to probe microscopic or small injuries that are invisible in two-dimensional images by measuring the directional coherence of water diffusion in white matter [27]. Furthermore, diffusion tensor tractography (DTT), derived from DTI, has the advantage of using three dimensions to visualize and evaluate specific neural tracts by measuring the quantitative indices of fractional anisotropy (FA), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and fiber number (FN) [28, 29]. Thus, many studies have used DTT to evaluate neural tract injuries following mild TBI [30, 31, 32]. Specifically, injuries to several neural tracts, including the corticobulbar tract, fornix, and spinothalamic tract following mild TBI, have been reported using DTT [30, 31, 32]. However, there is very little data on CP-related injuries in mild TBI, barring one case study on an injury to the ICP [13]. To date, no study has investigated a large sample of patients with balance problems following a mild TBI for injuries to the three CPs. This study hypothesized that injury to CPs and mild TBI could be the cause of balance problems in these patients.

Thus, we used DTT to investigate injuries to the three CPs in patients with balance problems following mild TBI.

2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Subjects

We recruited twenty-one patients (male: 10, female: 11, mean age: 42.4 ± 9.6 years, range: 28~58 years) with mild TBI and 21 normal healthy subjects (male: 10, female: 11, mean age: 40.5 ± 9.2 years, range: 27~57 years) with no previous history of neurological, physical, or psychiatric illnesses were recruited as controls for this study (Table 1). Patients were recruited according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) loss of consciousness for <30 minutes, post-traumatic amnesia for 24 hours, and initial Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13–15 [24], (2) absence of a specific lesion on a brain MRI (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and fluid attenuated inversion recovery images), (3) complaints of balance or gait disturbance after the onset of head trauma, and (4) no history of previous head trauma, neurological, or psychiatric disease. The patients and control subjects provided signed, informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by our institutional review board (approval number: YUMC 2021-03-014).

Table 1.Demographic and clinical data of the patient and control groups.
Patient group Control group p-value
Sex (male:female) 10:11 10:11 1.000
Mean age, years 42.4 (9.6) 40.5 (9.2) 0.373
LOC, minutes 5.14 (6.97)
PTA, minutes 14.62 (21.67)
GCS score 14.86 (0.48)
Mean duration to DTI, months 5.4 (3.9)
BESS score 20.7 (5.8) 10.6 (4.3) 0.000*

Values represent mean (± standard deviation); LOC, loss of consciousness; PTA, post-traumatic amnesia; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; BESS, balance error scoring system.

*Significant difference between patient and control groups, p < 0.05.

2.2 Clinical Evaluation

Balance was evaluated using the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), a reliable and valid tool for assessing postural stability [33]. Three different stances (double-leg [hands on the hips and feet together], one-leg [standing on the non-dominant leg with hands on hips], and tandem stances [non-dominant foot behind the dominant foot]) were tested twice, once on a firm surface and once on balance foam for a total of six trials. The order of the clinical tests was randomized between subjects and sessions, with each test lasting 20 seconds. Subjects were instructed to maintain balance, make any necessary adjustments, and return to the testing position as quickly as possible. Performance was scored by the addition of 1 error point for each error committed, and the range of scores was 0–60 (lower scores indicate better balance and fewer errors). The average BESS score in the patient group (20.7 ± 5.8) was significantly different to that in the control group (10.6 ± 4.3).

2.3 Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Diffusion tension imaging data were acquired 5.4 ± 3.9 months after the onset of mild TBI using a 6-channel head coil on a 1.5T Philips Gyroscan Intera (Philips, Ltd, Best, the Netherlands) with single-shot echo-planar imaging. For each of the 32 non-collinear diffusion-sensitizing gradients, 70 contiguous slices parallel to the anterior commissure-posterior commissure line were acquired. The imaging parameters were as follows: acquisition matrix = 96 × 96; reconstructed matrix = 192 × 192; field of view = 240 × 240 mm2; repetition time (TR) = 10,398 ms; echo time (TE) = 72 ms; parallel imaging reduction factor = 2; echo planar imaging (EPI) factor = 59; b = 1000 s/mm2; and slice thickness = 2.5 mm (acquired voxel size = 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.5 mm3). Prior to the fiber tracking, an eddy current correction was applied to correct the head motion effect and image distortion using the functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain (FMRIB) Software Library [34]. DTI-Studio software (Center of Magnetic Resonance Microimaging, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA) based on deterministic tracking was used for the reconstruction of the three CPs [35, 36]. For the SCP, regions were defined as follows: region of interest (ROI) 1—the junction of the SCP between the upper pons and cerebellum; ROI 2—between the lateral wall of the fourth ventricle and the ICP at the fourth ventricle level on the color map. For the MCP: ROI 1—the anterior junction of the MCP between the pons and cerebellum, and the posterior; ROI 2—junction of the MCP between the pons and cerebellum on the color map. For the ICP: ROI 1—restiform body; ROI 2—the caudal part of the SCP on the axial view at the upper pons level on the color map. Fiber tracking was started at the center of a seed voxel with an FA >0.2 and ended at a voxel with an FA of <0.2 and a tract turning-angle of <60 degrees. The FA, ADC, and FN parameters of the CPs were measured.

2.4 Statistical Analysis

SPSS software (SPSS for Windows, Version 15.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. Levene’s Test for equality of variances was used to assess the meeting of the statistical assumption of homogeneity of variance between the patient and control groups, and equal variance was met. An independent t-test was used to compare the BESS score and DTT parameters (FA, ADC, and FN values) between the patient and control groups. The null hypothesis of no difference was rejected if the p-values were less than 0.05. The statistical power of the sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1 (Version 9.4, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany) and showed a 0.5 effect size, 0.05 α error probability, and 0.34 power (1-β error probability).

3. Results

Thinning of both SCPs and discontinuation of both ICPs were observed in the patient group when compared with the control group (Fig. 1). A summary of the results of the CP-related DTI parameters measured in the patient and control groups is shown in Table 2. The FN values of the SCP and ICP in the patient group were significantly lower than the values in the control group (p < 0.05). In contrast, there were no significant differences in the FA and ADC values of the SCP and ICP between the patient and control groups (p > 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the patient and control groups in the FA, ADC, and FN values of the MCP (p > 0.05).

Fig. 1.

Results of brain magnetic resonance (MR) images and diffusion tensor tractography of the three cerebellar peduncles. (A) T2-weighted brain MR images show no abnormalities in a patient and a control. (B) Results of diffusion tensor tractography of the three cerebellar peduncles in a patient and a control. Compared with the control, thinning (purple arrows) of both superior cerebellar peduncles and discontinuation (sky-blue arrows) of both inferior cerebellar peduncles are seen in the patient.

Table 2.Results of diffusion tensor tractography parameters values of three cerebellar peduncles of the patient and control groups.
Patient group Control group
FA ADC FN FA ADC FN
SCP Right 0.48 (0.03) 0.84 (0.06) 1086.38 (574.94) 0.48 (0.02) 0.82 (0.03) 1456.41 (519.43)
Left 0.49 (0.03) 0.81 (0.04) 1121.10 (620.93) 0.50 (0.03) 0.80 (0.03) 1603.36 (546.23)
Both 0.49 (0.03) 0.82 (0.05) 1103.74* (591.30) 0.49 (0.03) 0.81 (0.03) 1529.89 (531.98)
MCP Right 0.51 (0.02) 0.79 (0.03) 4879.43 (1243.08) 0.51 (0.01) 0.80 (0.03) 4606.55 (1193.04)
Left 0.51 (0.02) 0.80 (0.03) 4902.76 (1105.38) 0.52 (0.01) 0.80 (0.03) 4774.23 (922.01)
Both 0.51 (0.02) 0.79 (0.03) 4891.10 (1161.87) 0.51 (0.01) 0.80 (0.03) 4690.39 (1057.11)
ICP Right 0.48 (0.03) 0.84 (0.04) 279.57 (83.13) 0.48 (0.02) 0.85 (0.03) 326.32 (64.39)
Left 0.48 (0.03) 0.86 (0.06) 239.29 (102.18) 0.47 (0.03) 0.86 (0.03) 319.59 (76.36)
Both 0.48 (0.03) 0.85 (0.05) 259.43* (94.23) 0.48 (0.03) 0.85 (0.03) 322.95 (69.89)

Values represent mean (± standard deviation); FA, fractional anisotropy; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; FN, fiber number; SCP, superior cerebellar peduncle; MCP, middle cerebellar peduncle; ICP, inferior cerebellar peduncle.

*Significant differences between patient and control groups, p < 0.05.

4. Discussion

In the current study, injuries to the three CPs were investigated using DTT in patients with balance problems following mild TBI. The patient group showed injuries to the SCP and ICP (as observed by a decrease in the FN value) compared with the control group. However, based on the FN values, the MCPs in the patient group did not appear to be injured. This could be attributed to the more robust anatomical characteristics of the MCP, with large or thick fibers relative to the SCP and ICP [4]. In addition, the junction areas between the brain stem and the cerebellum involving the SCP and ICP are probably the most vulnerable to injuries [6]. Among the commonly assessed DTT parameters, the FA, ADC, and FN have been widely used to detect injuries of the neural tracts [27, 37]. The FA value measures the directionality of diffusion and reflects fiber density and axonal diameter, ranging from 0 to 1 [37]. The ADC value is an index of the rate of diffusion averaged over all directions [37]. The FN value indicates the volume of the neural tract based on the number of voxels within the neural tract [37]. Thus, a decrease in the FA or FN or an increase in the ADC represents injuries of the neural tract [27, 37]. As the patients did not show any specific lesions on conventional MRIs, we believe the decrease in the FN of the SCP and ICP in the patient group could be at least partly ascribed to balance problems.

Several DTI-based studies have reported damage to CPs in patients with brain injuries caused by tumors, multiple sclerosis, and infarcts [5, 6, 7, 8]. Hong et al. (2009) [6] investigated the CPs in six patients with gait and balance problems and found injuries to the SCP and ICP at the junction area between the brain stem and cerebellum following a diffuse axonal injury. In 2015, Drijkoningen et al. [7] demonstrated that improvements in balance were associated with recovery of the injured ICP in 19 patients with moderate to severe TBI. In 2020, Gera et al. [5] reported that SCP and ICP injuries were related to posture sway in 29 patients with multiple sclerosis. They asserted that the SCP contributed to the control of the standing posture with visual information, and that the ICP contributed to the control of standing balance regardless of visual information. Kim et al. (2021) [8] demonstrated that an injured ICP showed a moderate correlation with gait function in 27 patients with hemorrhagic stroke. All the studies indicated that injuries to the SCP and ICP were associated with balance or gait problems in patients with brain injuries. The results of our study agree with the results of these earlier studies.

Few DTT-based studies have reported CP injury in patients with balance problems [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. Yamada et al. (2003) [9] demonstrated that the forward-leaning posture and inability to walk in a patient with a lateral medullary infarct were ascribed to an injury of the ICP. In 2010, Hong and Jang described injuries to the three CPs that were involved with poor balance in six patients with cerebellar infarcts [10]. Kwon and Jang (2012) [11] found injuries of various neural tracts, including the corticospinal tract, fornix, and ICP, in a patient with gait disturbance following a diffuse axonal injury. Subsequently, Kim et al. (2014) [12] found that an injured SCP affected the gait and balance in a patient with a tumor. They also reported that the recovery of the SCP mainly contributed to an improvement of the balance and gait function after 3 months. In 2019, Kim et al. [14] demonstrated that decreased axial diffusivity in the left ICP positively correlated with poor balance control in 15 patients with mild to moderate TBI. One case study in three patients with mild TBI investigated the injury to the ICP and demonstrated that the gait and balance problems could be ascribed to a decrease in the FN of the ICP [13]. In all these studies, injuries to the SCP and ICP were related to balance problems, as was seen in our study. In addition, because the functions of the SCP and ICP are to carry and integrate vestibular and proprioception information, the balance problems in our patients appeared to be ascribed to injuries to the SCP and ICP. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate injuries to both the SCP and ICP using DTT in a large number of patients with mild TBI. However, some limitations of this study should be considered [38, 39]. First, we recruited patients who had been admitted for rehabilitation at a university hospital. Therefore, it is possible that among all the patients with mild TBI, we only recruited chronic patients with severe clinical manifestations. Second, the fiber tracking technique is operator dependent. Third, DTT could lead to both false-positive and false-negative results throughout the white matter of the brain because of complex fiber configurations such as crossing or kissing fiber and partial volume effects.

5. Conclusions

Using DTT, we demonstrated that the balance problems in patients with mild TBI could be attributed to injuries to the SCP and ICP. Our results suggest that DTT could be useful in detecting injuries to CPs that may not be detected on conventional brain MRI in patients with mild TBI.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author Contributions

SHJ: study concept and design, manuscript development, writing, and critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. HGK: study concept, funding, design, data analysis, and critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. Both authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript. Both authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The patients and control subjects provided signed, informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by Yeungnam University Hospital institutional review board (approval number: YUMC 2021-03-014).

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2022R1F1A1066512).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
Zesiewicz TA, Wilmot G, Kuo SH, Perlman S, Greenstein PE, Ying SH, et al. Comprehensive systematic review summary: Treatment of cerebellar motor dysfunction and ataxia: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2018; 90: 464–471.
[2]
Schmahmann JD. An emerging concept. The cerebellar contribution to higher function. Archives of Neurology. 1991; 48: 1178–1187.
[3]
Stoodley CJ, Schmahmann JD. Functional topography in the human cerebellum: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. NeuroImage. 2009; 44: 489–501.
[4]
Mendoza JE, Foundas AL. Clinical neuroanatomy: a neurobehavioral approach. Springer: NY, USA. 2007.
[5]
Gera G, Fling BW, Horak FB. Cerebellar White Matter Damage Is Associated with Postural Sway Deficits in People with Multiple Sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2020; 101: 258–264.
[6]
Hong JH, Kim OL, Kim SH, Lee MY, Jang SH. Cerebellar peduncle injury in patients with ataxia following diffuse axonal injury. Brain Research Bulletin. 2009; 80: 30–35.
[7]
Drijkoningen D, Caeyenberghs K, Leunissen I, Vander Linden C, Leemans A, Sunaert S, et al. Training-induced improvements in postural control are accompanied by alterations in cerebellar white matter in brain injured patients. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2014; 7: 240–251.
[8]
Kim Y, Kim SH, Hong BY, Oh J, Chang SY. Integrity of the Inferior Cerebellar Peduncle Correlates with Ambulatory Function after Hemorrhagic Stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2021; 30: 106164.
[9]
Yamada K, Kizu O, Ito H, Nakamura H, Yuen S, Yoshikawa K, et al. Wallerian degeneration of the inferior cerebellar peduncle depicted by diffusion weighted imaging. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 2003; 74: 977–978.
[10]
Hong JH, Jang SH. The usefulness of DTI for estimating the state of cerebellar peduncles in cerebral infarct. NeuroRehabilitation. 2010; 26: 299–305.
[11]
Kwon HG, Jang SH. The usefulness of diffusion tensor imaging in detection of diffuse axonal injury in a patient with head trauma. Neural Regeneration Research. 2012; 7: 475–478.
[12]
Kim MS, Tak HJ, Son SM. Recovery of cerebellar peduncle injury in a patient with a cerebellar tumor: validation by diffusion tensor tractography. Neural Regeneration Research. 2014; 9: 1929–1932.
[13]
Jang SH, Yi JH, Kwon HG. Injury of the inferior cerebellar peduncle in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: A diffusion tensor tractography study. Brain Injury. 2016; 30: 1271–1275.
[14]
Kim E, Seo HG, Lee HH, Lee SH, Choi SH, Cho WS, et al. Altered White Matter Integrity after Mild to Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019; 8: 1318.
[15]
Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Wald MM. The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2006; 21: 375–378.
[16]
Maas AIR, Stocchetti N, Bullock R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. The Lancet. Neurology. 2008; 7: 728–741.
[17]
Caeyenberghs K, Leemans A, Geurts M, Taymans T, Linden CV, Smits-Engelsman BCM, et al. Brain-behavior relationships in young traumatic brain injury patients: DTI metrics are highly correlated with postural control. Human Brain Mapping. 2010; 31: 992–1002.
[18]
Caeyenberghs K, Leemans A, Geurts M, Taymans T, Vander Linden C, Smits-Engelsman BCM, et al. Brain-behavior relationships in young traumatic brain injury patients: fractional anisotropy measures are highly correlated with dynamic visuomotor tracking performance. Neuropsychologia. 2010; 48: 1472–1482.
[19]
Caeyenberghs K, Leemans A, De Decker C, Heitger M, Drijkoningen D, Linden CV, et al. Brain connectivity and postural control in young traumatic brain injury patients: A diffusion MRI based network analysis. NeuroImage. Clinical. 2012; 1: 106–115.
[20]
Caeyenberghs K, Leemans A, Geurts M, Linden CV, Smits-Engelsman BCM, Sunaert S, et al. Correlations between white matter integrity and motor function in traumatic brain injury patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2011; 25: 492–502.
[21]
Caeyenberghs K, Siugzdaite R, Drijkoningen D, Marinazzo D, Swinnen SP. Functional Connectivity Density and Balance in Young Patients with Traumatic Axonal Injury. Brain Connectivity. 2015; 5: 423–432.
[22]
Calzolari E, Chepisheva M, Smith RM, Mahmud M, Hellyer PJ, Tahtis V, et al. Vestibular agnosia in traumatic brain injury and its link to imbalance. Brain. 2021; 144: 128–143.
[23]
De Kruijk JR, Twijnstra A, Leffers P. Diagnostic criteria and differential diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 2001; 15: 99–106.
[24]
Alexander MP. Mild traumatic brain injury: pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical management. Neurology. 1995; 45: 1253–1260.
[25]
Niogi SN, Mukherjee P, Ghajar J, Johnson C, Kolster RA, Sarkar R, et al. Extent of microstructural white matter injury in postconcussive syndrome correlates with impaired cognitive reaction time: a 3T diffusion tensor imaging study of mild traumatic brain injury. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2008; 29: 967–973.
[26]
Kou Z, Wu Z, Tong KA, Holshouser B, Benson RR, Hu J, et al. The role of advanced MR imaging findings as biomarkers of traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2010; 25: 267–282.
[27]
Anzai Y, Minoshima S. Imaging of traumatic brain injury: current and future. Imaging Med. 2011; 3: 153–165.
[28]
Mori S, Crain BJ, Chacko VP, van Zijl PC. Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of Neurology. 1999; 45: 265–269.
[29]
Behrens TEJ, Berg HJ, Jbabdi S, Rushworth MFS, Woolrich MW. Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? NeuroImage. 2007; 34: 144–155.
[30]
Jang SH, Kim SH, Kwon HG. Diagnostic sensitivity of traumatic axonal injury of the spinothalamic tract in patients with mild traumatic brain injury. Medicine. 2022; 101: e28536.
[31]
Jang SH, Kim SY. Injury of the Corticospinal Tract in Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Diffusion Tensor Tractography Study. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2016; 33: 1790–1795.
[32]
D’souza MM, Trivedi R, Singh K, Grover H, Choudhury A, Kaur P, et al. Traumatic brain injury and the post-concussion syndrome: A diffusion tensor tractography study. The Indian Journal of Radiology & Imaging. 2015; 25: 404–414.
[33]
Riemann BL, Guskiewicz KM, Shields EW. Relationship between clinical and forceplate measures of postural stability. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. 1999; 8: 71–82.
[34]
Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage. 2004; 23: S208–S219.
[35]
Jiang H, van Zijl PCM, Kim J, Pearlson GD, Mori S. DtiStudio: resource program for diffusion tensor computation and fiber bundle tracking. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2006; 81: 106–116.
[36]
Habas C, Cabanis EA. Anatomical parcellation of the brainstem and cerebellar white matter: a preliminary probabilistic tractography study at 3 T. Neuroradiology. 2007; 49: 849–863.
[37]
Assaf Y, Pasternak O. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based white matter mapping in brain research: a review. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience. 2008; 34: 51–61.
[38]
Yamada K, Sakai K, Akazawa K, Yuen S, Nishimura T. MR tractography: a review of its clinical applications. Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences. 2009; 8: 165–174.
[39]
Fillard P, Descoteaux M, Goh A, Gouttard S, Jeurissen B, Malcolm J, et al. Quantitative evaluation of 10 tractography algorithms on a realistic diffusion MR phantom. NeuroImage. 2011; 56: 220–234.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share
Back to top