1. Introduction
The high frequency of human contact with domestic pigs poses a significant risk
for transmitting the African swine fever virus (ASFV) to humans. Although the
ASFV primarily affects members of the Suidae family, similar genomes or ASFV-like
sequences have been isolated from various samples of human biological materials,
including serum and water environments [1, 2]. The entry of such viruses into the
human body most likely occurs through the alimentary route and does not cause
infection. It is known that the ASFV cannot infect or cause disease in humans,
even in regions where the virus is endemic. However, the identification of
ASFV-like sequences in the serum of several human patients suggests that human
infection may be possible [1].
Porcine (primary) macrophages, including porcine alveolar macrophages (PAMs),
are the main target of the ASFV. The virus developed several strategies to
replicate efficiently, avoiding recognition by the host immune system [3]. For
the first time, the ability of the ASFV to affect non-porcine macrophages
(M0) was initially investigated in 1977 [4]. The study revealed that
M0 macrophages, infected with the VERO cell-adapted ASFV, demonstrated
an intense ability to destroy the cells. The latter was not associated with
either virus propagation or induction of DNA synthesis [4]. At the same time, the
authors pointed to an abortive replication of the ASFV in chicken macrophages.
The authors speculated that one possible explanation for this phenomenon could be
the possibility of division (progress to the cell cycle) in chicken macrophages.
Few studies also report successful adaptation of the wild-type ASFV strains to
continuous cell lines of human origin [5, 6]. However, there are significant
differences between replication in actively dividing cell lines and macrophages,
usually in the G0 phase of the cell cycle. Macrophages typically exist in two
states, G0 and G1-like states, rather than in the S and/or G2 phases of the cell
cycle [7]. The significance of cell cycle progress for ASFV replication was also
shown on virus-sensitive (PAMs). Based on the findings of Avagyan et al.
[8] 2022, it is highly probable that the stimulation of the cell cycle in
infected PAMs is necessary for ASFV replication to acquire the necessary
nucleotides.
Given the central importance of macrophages in controlling the pathogenesis of
viral infections, including the ASFV, we aimed to investigate the ability of the
ASFV to adapt and replicate in human macrophages. Specifically, we sought to
understand the mechanisms that limit the susceptibility of M0 (M0
macrophages) to the ASFV. To address these questions, we conducted in
vitro infections of THP-1-derived M0 macrophages with the ASFV. This model
allowed us to assess the phenotypic and functional changes in M0 macrophages
induced by the viral load and examine the replication of the virus within the
cells.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1 The Virus
The ASFV Armenia/07 strain was used in all experiments. The ASFV was obtained
from the spleen of infected pigs. The virus (Armenia/07) was first isolated in
2007 from the spleen of an ASFV-infected swine. Virus titration was performed as
described previously and expressed by hemadsorption unit (HADU) as lg10 HADU50/mL for
non-adapted cells [9]. Measurements in HADU make it possible to estimate the
number of infectious units of the virus when studying hemadsorbing strains of the
ASF virus. Therefore, this technique complements quantitative measurements of
viral genome copies well. The titer was expressed as hemadsorption units—an
HADU50/mL.
The virus for experiments was received after 48 h infections of PAMs. The HADU
technique was carried out on the primary culture of porcine alveolar macrophages
[10]. The ASFV was inactivated by incubating in a water bath (65 °C at
10 min). After heat inactivation, the virus was tested for infectivity using
in vitro cell culture.
2.2 Cell Culture
All the information about software/equipment/drugs/reagents are included in Supplementary
Material 1. Human acute myeloid leukemia cell line THP-1 obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA,
USA), validated by STR profiling and tested negative for mycoplasma, was
maintained in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies) medium and
supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 10
mM Hepes, and 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Sigma) in
a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO. M0 macrophage-like
THP-1 cells (M0) were generated in a 24-well plate at a density of 2
10 cells per milliliter by the treatment of THP-1 cells with
phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) for 72 h, followed by
a resting period in fresh RPMI medium for 24 h. The plates were washed with RPMI
to remove non-adherent cells before other experimental viral treatments.
Polarized M0 status was confirmed by flow cytometry and microscopy.
2.3 Human Macrophage
Infection
For in vitro experiments, ASFV was grown in a culture of THP-1-derived
M0 macrophages (M0) for 24 h and 48 h. M0, seeded as
described above, were inoculated with ASFV Arm07 at 10 HADU50/mL from the
1st passage; the dose was chosen to prevent spontaneous apoptosis caused by
viral particles (0,1 MOI). Following adsorption at 37 °C for 1 h, the
infected cell monolayer was washed twice to remove any unbound viruses. A
complete medium was then added and analyzed at the indicated time points. The
ASFV infection was performed on M0 in two stages—24 hours
post-infection (hpi) and 48 hpi. After 1 hpi, cells were washed twice with medium
and cultivated at 37 °C with 5% CO [9].
2.4 Porcine Alveolar
Macrophages Infection
For comparison with human macrophages, we used a primary culture of PAMs, which
were seeded according to the generally accepted standard method and inoculated
with ASFV Arm07 at 10 HADU50/mL. After adsorption at 37 °C for 1
h, the infected cell monolayers were washed twice to remove unbound viruses.
Afterward, a complete medium was added and analyzed at the indicated time. All
data were obtained at 24 and 48 hpi [9].
2.5 Cell Viability
and Apoptosis Assays
Macrophage apoptosis and viability during infection were assessed using Annexin
V and propidium iodide (PI). The cells were harvested, trypsinized, and
resuspended in Annexin binding buffer before adding 5 µL Annexin V-FITC
(Biolegend) and incubated in the dark at 4 °C for 30 min. Immediately
before cytometric analysis, the cells were labeled with PI. Data were acquired on
a FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using the FlowJo vX0.7 software
(Tree Star, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA).
2.6 Staining Techniques
To better characterize cellular morphology, investigated cells were cultured in
6-well chamber slides. For morphological analysis, cells were fixed in pure
methanol and stained with Pappenheim (Cypress Diagnostics, Belgium), according to
the manufacturer’s protocol. Additionally, Hematoxylin–Eosin staining was used
(Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s protocols.
To detect viral factories, cytospectrophotometry and Feulgen–Naphthol Yellow S
staining procedures were used as described previously [11].
2.7 Flow Cytometry
Flow cytometry analysis was used to evaluate the effect of inactive and active
ASFV (inASFV and aASFV) treatments on M0 phenotype and inflammatory
markers. At the end of each experiment, the cells were washed twice and incubated
for 15 min with PBS supplemented with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) to prevent
non-specific binding of antibodies and conjugated with the following antibodies:
CD36-FITC, CD80-FITC, CD163-PE, CD11b-PerCP, HLA-DR-PerCP, CD11b-PerCP, CD282
(TLR2)-Pe-Cy7, CD182 (CXCR2)-PeCy7, CDD197 (CCR7)-APC, CD11c-APC-Cy7, and
CD14-APC-Cy7. To analyze the intracellular expression of the TLRs, the cells were
fixed and permeabilized after surface-staining and labeled with CD283 (TLR3)-PE
and CD289 (TLR9)-APC (all Biolegend). Positive and negative thresholds for
fluorescence signals were defined using isotype-specific negative controls. Data
were acquired on a Becton Dickinson LSRII flow cytometer and analyzed using the
FlowJo vX0.7 software. In all experiments, a minimum of 10,000 events were
counted. Results are expressed as the percentage and mean fluorescence intensity
(MFI).
2.8 Phagocytosis Assay
For determining the phagocytic capacity of macrophages, pH-sensitive
fluorochrome pHrodo-green-labeled Zymosan BioParticles (ThermoFisher) were used
at a concentration of 50 µg/mL, according to the manufacturer’s
recommendation. Briefly, particles were added to the attached cells and incubated
at 37 °C and 5% CO for 2 h. All cell lines were validated by STR
profiling and tested negative for mycoplasma. Cells were all cultured in a
humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO. Cells were placed on ice
to stop further phagocytosis and analyzed using a FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences).
The frequency of pHrodo+ cells and/or the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was
determined.
2.9 LAMP-1 Cytometry
After the indicated stimulations, the cells were removed from the plate by
trypsinization, washed, and stained with surface lysosome-associated membrane
protein (LAMP-1-PE, CD107a). Then, the cells were fixed, permeabilized, and
stained with LAMP-1-APC (Biolegend) for intracellular staining. Afterward, the
cells were washed and analyzed by flow cytometry.
2.10 Cytokine Detection
After the treatments described above, cell-free supernatants were quantified for
the presence of interleukin (IL)-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and interferon
(IFN)- using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Biolegend),
according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Absorbance was read at 450 nm using a
HiPo MPP-96 Plate Reader.
2.11 Gene Expression
Analysis by Quantitative Real-Time PCR
To determine ASFV expression in PAM cell lines, total viral RNA/DNA was isolated
using the HiGene™ Viral RNA/DNA Prep kit (BIOFACT). RNA/DNA
samples were then reverse transcribed using the FIREScript® RT
cDNA synthesis kit (Solis Biodyne). Both methods were conducted following the
manufacturer’s instructions. When measuring DNA/RNA concentrations with a
NanoDrop® ND-1000, UV-Vis Spectrophotometer A260/280 values were
acceptable. A ratio of ~1.8 is considered “pure” for DNA; a
ratio of ~2.0 is considered “pure” for RNA. Quantitative
real-time PCR was performed using the SYBR green methods previously described
[12, 13] on an Eco Illumina Real-Time PCR system device (Illumina Inc). Each
reaction mixture (20 µL) was composed of 4 µL of 5 HOT
FIREPol® EvaGreen® qPCR Mix Plus (ROX) (Solis
BioDyne), 0.2 µL of each specific primer, 4 µL of template DNA/cDNA,
and 11.6 µL of ddHO. Positive and negative controls were used. DNA
isolated from an ASFV-infected pig’s spleen was used as a positive control. For
the negative control, ddHO was added to the reaction mix instead of a
sample. Reactions were carried out in the following conditions: polymerase
activation: 95 °C for 12 min, 40 cycles: 95 °C for 15 s, 52
°C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. Standard curves were created
using serial 10-fold dilutions of viral DNA. The fluorescence threshold value
(Ct) was calculated using the ECO-Illumina system software. Primers used for
amplification were designed and ordered from Integrated DNA Technology-IDT
(https://www.idtdna.com/pagesasfollows).
Viral genes were measured at 48 hpi to determine the viral amount and after 24
hpi to analyze the transcriptional activity of separate genes. For alignment of
the cDNA plots and infection titers of ASFV, Cq values were rescaled after
comparing with viral genome copies and modified in absolute amounts along the
y-axis for better visualization. To evaluate the ASFV replication effectivity
profile, the genes with different temporal expression patterns were identified
[8, 14]. All primers are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.Details of oligonucleotide primers employed in the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assay.
Gene |
Product |
Sequence (5–3) |
F778R |
Ribonucleotide reductase |
F: TATGAACCTGAACTAAGC |
|
|
R: AATGACAGTAATAGGAACC |
F334L |
Ribonucleotide reductase |
F: CAATCATCAATGTCCTTAC, |
|
|
R: GAATGTTGGAACTGGTAT |
E165R |
dUTPase |
F: CCTGACCATATCAACATCCTAA |
|
|
R: AATCTACCCTCGCCTCTT |
G1112R |
DNA polymerase |
F: CCGACTCATTATACATTACAT |
|
|
R: TCATAGACAGAAGCACTT |
P1192R |
II DNA topoisomerase |
F: TGAAGAGCAAGATTCCATAGA |
|
|
R: GTAAGGTAGCCACGCATA |
A240L |
Thymidylate kinase |
F: TGCGTGGAATACTCATTG |
|
|
R: TCGTGTCTGGATTAGGAA |
K196R |
Thymidine kinase |
F: GCAGTTGTCGTAGATGAAG |
|
|
R: CGAAGGAAGCATTGAGTC |
F1055L |
Helicase Superfamily II |
F: TTGAAGAACTGCCTGATA |
|
|
R: ATAGAATTATTGCCGTAGTATT |
B246L |
P72 |
F: CCGATCACATTACCTCTTATTAAAAACATTTCC |
|
|
R: GTGTCCCAACTAATATAAAATTCTCTTGCTCT |
R298L |
Serine/threonine-protein kinase |
F: GTGTGGACGATAGGTATGG |
|
|
R: TCTGAAATGTTCTCGGGAAT |
EP1142L |
DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit beta |
F: ATCAATAGCACCAAGTTCTCA |
|
|
R: TGTCATCGCCTGTCATTC |
0174L |
DNA polymerase X-like |
F: CATCGTTGCTGTTGGTAG |
|
|
R: TCCTTTATGCGAATGTTGG |
A859L |
Helicase |
F: CCTTCTCTTCTTGTGATTG |
|
|
R: GACATTCATCGCTAATAATAAG |
2.12 Enzyme-Linked
Immunosorbent Assay
Porcine IFN- (MBS162596), IL-10 (MBS2019681), and TNF-
(MBS2019932) were purchased from MyBioSource. ELISA was performed using the
manufacturer’s description. The IFN levels and/or receptors were measured in
duplicate using a colorimetric reader (Stat Fax 303 Plus) and calculated
according to the standard curve supplied by the kit.
2.13 Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 6.01,
https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/).
The results are expressed as the mean standard error (SEM). Statistical
significance for the differences between groups measured in M0 cells
was calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test.
*p 0.05, **p 0.01.
All in vitro experiments with virus analysis were conducted in
triplicate. The significance has been evaluated using a two-tailed Student’s
t-test. SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) has been applied
for statistical analyses.
3. Results
3.1 Passaging of
ASFV on Human Macrophage-Like Cells
The virus was blindly passaged to determine the possible susceptibility of
M0 to ASFV infection. We found that the genome copies of ASFV
decreased in M0 starting from the first passage to the fourth (Fig. 1A). The K196R gene belongs to the group of late genes. Since the late
genes in the ASF virus in an unusual target cell are not always transcribed or
transcribed very late, we chose one of the late genes to better assess the
virus’s ability to replicate fully. However, simultaneously with the
K196R gene, we also studied other genes that showed similar results
(data not shown). Similar data were obtained when the virus was titrated by HADU
(Fig. 1B). The number of infectious virus particles at the third passage was
2.5–3 lg lower than the initial one and stock virus. However, the ASFV was detected in all
examined samples in the third passage. In the fourth passage, only one of the six
samples contained an infectious virus (Fig. 1B). Despite this, transcription of
some viral genes continued (or persisted) in the third passage, although it had
almost disappeared in the fourth passage (Fig. 1A).
Fig. 1.
African swine fever virus (ASFV) amounts in porcine alveolar and
human macrophages. (A) Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
results of genome amount ASFV K196R and complementary DNA (cDNA) in 1st, 3rd, and
4th passages. *significant compared with 1st passage (p 0.05); **
tendency (p 0.1) compared with 1st passage. (B) ASFV hemadsorption unit (HADU) titers in
M0 in 1st, 3rd, and 4th passages. *significant compared with porcine
alveolar macrophage (PAM) (p 0.05); ** tendency (p 0.1)
compared to PAM.
3.2 Comparison of
Transcriptional Activity of ASFV Early and Late Genes in Infected Human
Macrophage-Like Cells
We studied thirteen genes involved in viral replication to identify and analyze
the transcriptional activity of the ASFV genes in human M0 cells. The
level of the virus genes was compared with the viral transcript levels. All
studied genes were divided into two groups: early genes (Fig. 2A) and ambivalent
to replication time genes—late genes (Fig. 2B).
Fig. 2.
Quantitative real-time PCR results of ASFV K196R,
R298L, A2410L, F778R, F334L, and
E165R mRNA (cDNA) in ASFV-infected human M0 and PAM lysates
at 24 hpi. (A) Early genes and their transcriptional activity (cDNA) in
ASFV-infected M0. (B) Ambivalent and late genes and their
transcriptional activity (cDNA) in ASFV-infected M0. (C) Early genes
and their transcriptional activity (cDNA) in ASFV-infected PAMs. (D) Early genes
and their transcriptional activity (cDNA) in ASFV-infected PAMs. *significant
compared to PAMs (p 0.05); ** tendency (p 0.1) compared
to DNA levels. mRNA, messenger RNA; M0, M0 macrophages; hpi, hours
post infection.
The following ASFV early genes can be transcribed in M0 cells:
F778R ribonucleotide reductase (large subunit), F334L
ribonucleotide reductase (small subunit), E165R deoxyuridine
triphosphatase, G1211R DNA polymerase -like, P1192R
DNA topoisomerase type II. At the same time, our data did not reveal the
transcriptional activity of early genes, such as the F1055L helicase
superfamily and A240L thymidylate kinase (Fig. 2A).
Ambivalent genes O174L DNA polymerase X-like and K196R
thymidine kinase exhibited transcriptional activity, whereas EP1242L
RNA polymerase subunit 2 and A859L helicase superfamily II did not
display any detectable transcriptional activity. Both late genes R298L
serine protein kinase and B646L major capsid protein demonstrate
transcriptional activity (Fig. 2B). In conclusion, regardless of the timing of
transcription in susceptible cells, certain ASFV genes show transcriptional
activity, and others do not.
The same genes were examined for transcriptional activity in PAMs infected with
a similar dose of ASF virus. As follows from Fig. 2, all genes, both early (Fig. 2C) and late (Fig. 2D), demonstrate high transcriptional activity.
3.3 Morphological Examination
A morphological examination revealed that intact macrophages generally have a
small and round shape, with few vacuoles and small pseudopodia. Nonetheless,
signs of macrophage activation can occasionally be detected within the intact
population. Additionally, intact macrophages were also characterized by
cytoplasmic vacuolization, which was observed only in a minority of cells (Fig. 3A).
Fig. 3.
Morphological characteristics of the ASFV-infected human
macrophages. (A) Intact M0 with vacuolized cytoplasm; Hematoxylin and
Eosin (H–E) staining. Scale bar: 10 µm. (B) Infected (24 hpi) with
active ASFV enlarged M0 with massive vacuolization, which includes
nucleus (arrowed), H–E staining. Scale bar: 10 µm. (C)
M0 incubated with inactive ASFV (48 hpi) severe vacuolization,
Pappenheim staining. Scale bar: 10 µm. (D) M0 incubated
with inactive ASFV (48 hpi) severe vacuolization, cytoplasmic basophilia
(arrowed), H–E staining. Scale bar: 10 µm. (E) Infection (48 hpi)
with active ASFV M0 with mild vacuolization and pronounced pseudopodia
(arrowed), H–E staining. Scale bar: 10 µm. (F) Infection (48
hpi) with active ASFV M0 with mild vacuolization and pronounced
pseudopodia (arrowed), Pappenheim staining. Scale bar: 10 µm. (G) Infected
(24 hpi) with active ASFV M0 without viral factories, Feulgen
staining. Scale bar: 10 µm. (H) Infected (24 hpi) with active ASFV
porcine alveolar macrophages with typical viral factory (arrowed), Feulgen
staining. Scale bar: 10 µm.
Analysis of the morphology of M0 cells infected with the virus showed
noteworthy variations at 24 and 48 hpi. At 24 hpi, the morphology of macrophages
infected with the inactivated virus resembled that of macrophages infected with
the active virus, possibly due to viral envelope components. Both groups of
infected M0 cells exhibited prominent cytoplasmic vacuolization, which
occupied most of the volume of the cytoplasm and sometimes the nucleus (Fig. 3B).
Cytoplasmic vacuolization and basophilia were typically absent in intact
macrophages (Fig. 3A), they were observed in M0 cells infected by both
inactivated and active virus (Fig. 3C,D). By 48 hpi, significant differences were
observed between the two groups with the inactivated virus, where macrophage
activation continues in groups with the infectious virus (Fig. 3E,F), where many
signs of inhibition of cell activity were observed. Pronounced pseudopodia were
visible in some ASFV-infected M0 cells (Fig. 3E).
Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that none of the samples analyzed for the
presence of viral factories on Feulgen-stained preparations revealed DNA-positive
structures in the cytoplasm of infected cells (Fig. 3G). In contrast, when ASFV
infects susceptible cells, such as primary cultures of PAMs, factories are
typically detected in significant numbers and are clearly visible (Fig. 3H).
Hence, M0 infected with ASFV (Arm07) do not exhibit the typical
factories observed in infected susceptible cells, such as PAMs.
3.4 Apoptotic Rate and Death of M0 Transfected with ASFV
To investigate the viability of M0 cells upon infection with ASFV, we
analyzed the rates of dead cells and apoptosis. Flow cytometry analysis has shown
that active and inactive viruses do not alter the viability of M0
cells after infection for 48 hours. Despite the apoptotic rate being increased in
both suited groups (aASFV and inASFV), their differences from the control group
were not significant (Fig. 4A).
Fig. 4.
Functional tests of THP-1-derived M0 cells infected
with active virus (aASFV) and inactivated virus (inASFV) (n = 6). (A) Percentage
of live, apoptotic, and dead cells. (B) Representative overlay of histograms of
pH changes in M0 labeled with pHrodo-green-labeled Zymosan
BioParticles. (C) Expression levels of surface and intracellular
lysosome-associated membrane protein (LAMP-1) quantified as mean fluorescent
intensity (MFI). Each experiment was repeated three times, and the results were
averaged. Ctl, control.
3.5 Phagocytic Activity of M0 Cells and their Lysosomal Content
Next, we studied the phagocytic activity of ASFV-infected M with
pH-sensitive fluorescent pHrodo dye. After engulfment, the intensity of pHrodo
light emission was slightly elevated in M0 infected with inASFV
(p = 0.05) compared to non-infected M0 (Fig. 4B).
The analysis revealed low lysosomal membrane glycoprotein LAMP-1 expression at
the M0 surface. Both M0+aASFV and M0+inASFV
exhibited increased surface LAMP-1, indicative of lysosome exocytosis of the
marker on the cell surface. In opposition to the surface marker expression,
intracellular expression of LAMP-1 showed decreased expression in both studied
groups (not significant) (Fig. 4C).
3.6 Immunophenotype
and TLR expression on M0 cells
To elucidate the response of M0 cells toward the presence of the
ASFV, we characterized the phenotype of the cells. Histograms of a representative
experiment and a summary of the surface marker expression profile for each
studied group are shown in Fig. 5. Overall, flow cytometry analysis revealed that
both aASFV and inASFV caused detectable changes in marker expression in
M0 cells. As shown in Fig. 5, the expression of several CD markers was
upregulated by the cells infected with active virus (aASFV), namely CD36, CD163,
CXCR2, and CD80. Interestingly, the expression of CD11c was downregulated in
infected cells, which is indicative of cell activation, albeit not significantly.
The process of downregulating the expression of CD11c is triggered by TLR4, TLR3,
and TLR9 signaling [15].
Fig. 5.
Differential expression of surface CD markers and Toll-like
receptors (TLRs) by human THP-1-derived M0 cells infected with active
virus (aASFV) and inactivated virus (inASFV). The graph shows the percentage of
M0 cells expressing TLR3 and TLR9 and mean fluorescent intensity (MFI)
of CD11c, CD36, CD163, CD11b, CXCR2, TLR2, HLA-DR and CD80 on the surface of
M0 cells. Data are presented as the mean standard error of the
mean. *p 0.05, **p 0.01, ns, not significant. Each
experiment was repeated three times, and the results were averaged.
Intending to identify cellular pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) responsible
for the viral activation in macrophages, we examined the expression levels of
TLR3 and TLR9, which have been described as receptors that mediate the sensing of
the ASFV (Ayanwale et al. [16] 2022). TLR2 was analyzed as a receptor
able to recognize viral antigens and sense endogenous danger-associated molecular
patterns (DAMPs) to trigger the process of self-healing and tissue repair [17].
We found that TLR2 expression was slightly upregulated in both the inASFV and
aASFV. Interestingly, the percentage of M0 cells positive for TLR3
(receptor mediating sensing of ASFV) was significantly increased only in a group
of the cells treated with the aASFV (Fig. 5).
3.7 Cytokine Production
Next, we measured the accumulation of TNF-, IL-10, and IFN-
in culture supernatants of ASFV-infected M0 cells (Fig. 6A). The
induction of TNF- resembled mainly immunophenotyping results.
Production of IL-10 was significantly increased in the aASFV group compared with
the inASFV group. Notably, the production of IFN- was reduced by the
active virus.
Fig. 6.
The effect of ASFV on production of cytokines
TNF, IFN-, and IL-10. (A) In culture supernatants of
THP-1-derived M0 cells infected with active virus (aASFV) and
inactivated virus (inASFV) (n = 7). (B) In culture supernatants of PAMs (n = 4).
Data are presented as the mean standard error of the mean. *p 0.05, **p 0.01, ns, not significant. The statistical
analysis of cytokine levels in the supernatants of THP-1-derived M0
cells was conducted using one-way ANOVA, while the cytokine levels in the
supernatants of PAMs were assessed using the Wilcoxon test. TNF, tumor
necrosis factor ; IFN-, interferon-; IL-10,
interleukin-10.
Similar to THP-1-derived M0 cells, the levels of measured
TNF- were increased in the PAMs infected with ASFV, while the
supernatant levels of IL-10 remained unchanged (Fig. 6B). However, the production
of IFN- differed between the THP-1-derived M0 and PAMs.
Particularly, PAMs infected with ASFV secreted higher amounts of IFN-
than the control group.
4. Discussion
Given the relative persistence of ASFV in the environment, humans have been in
close contact with the virus for a long time; therefore, it is reasonable to
assume that there have been numerous cases of human infection with the virus.
Isolation of the ASFV-like virus genomes from various samples of human biological
materials, including serum, confirms this fact [1]. There is also a study of the
interaction of ASFV particles with rabbit macrophages, which linked the absence
of specific receptors in these cells with the absence of a productive infection.
Despite the aforementioned, no pathological changes have been identified in
humans during an extensive virus screening. Only one known study describes an
association between ASF infection and human-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
[18]. However, those studies did not have a strong evidence base and are disputed
today. Given the previous, the human body has a high resistance to the ASFV.
It is important to note that the inhibition of transcriptional activity in
M0 infected with ASFV is not selective to only early or late genes but
rather a non-selective inhibition of a number of genes from both categories [19, 20]. This suggests that the virus is selectively inhibiting the transcriptional
activity of certain genes, regardless of whether these are early or late genes.
Further studies are required to elucidate the mechanisms of such selective
inhibition of viral gene transcription.
The limited cell tropism of ASFV suggests that a macrophage-specific receptor is
required for infection. Recent studies have suggested that CD163 may be necessary
for infection but insufficient, suggesting other surface proteins on macrophages
may also participate in the infection process [21]. In any case, the human CD163
receptor and/or other surface proteins of M0 allow the virus to
successfully enter the cells. Viral decapsidation occurs within mature endosomal
compartments that express CD163. Once decapsidated, viral particles expose the
inner envelope, which allows their interaction and subsequent fusion with the
endosomal membrane. This leads to the release of naked cores into the cytosol,
allowing viral replication to begin [21]. The ASFV is able to successfully
complete this stage of the replication cycle in M0 since only after
that can it start the transcription of viral genes.
During viral replication, certain genes, such as early genes, are expressed
before the viral DNA replication begins [8]. In human M0 cells, this
stage of viral replication is partially implemented: Several viral RNAs are not
observed and/or occur at a very low level. At the same time, we did not reveal
any difference in the functional state of transcription of viral genes,
regardless of whether they are early or late genes.
The ASFV not only transcribes its own genes for the metabolism of viral
replication but also has to suppress the host cell’s defense mechanisms. In
M0 cells, the ASFV retains the functionality of a number of such
mechanisms. The ASFV was unable to inhibit apoptosis in infected M0
cells. Our experiments showed that apoptosis in aASFV-infected M0
cells increased slightly in M0 cells exposed to the virus.
When infected, M cells alter their cytokine/chemokine profile to
defend the host. The presence of the viral genome triggers TLRs to stimulate the
production of type I interferons such as IFN, which may control early
viral replication by promoting apoptosis and hampering the proliferation of
virally infected cells. IFN-–induced activation of STAT1 and IRF1 is
responsible for producing IL-10 by human monocytes/macrophages [22]. Following
this trend, PAMs cultured with ASFV exhibited elevated levels of IFN-,
whereas THP-1-derived M0 cells showed no difference in their
production. The discrepancy may be due to the origin of cell types used in the
study. IFN- helps shape the overall immune response by enhancing the
phagocytic activity of macrophages, promoting their ability to engulf and digest
virus particles and infected cells [23]. In the context of ASFV, IFN-
can interfere with the ability of ASFV to replicate and spread within host cells,
contributing to the containment of the infection [24]. Concomitant to the
proinflammatory first line of defense triggered by TLR signaling, the
immunoregulatory cytokine IL-10 is induced in macrophages. IL-10 is a key player
in establishing and perpetuating viral persistence [25], and its increase is
usually associated with high virulence [26, 27]. Macrophages primarily produce
IL-10 in response to TLR signaling as a form of feedback to limit the
inflammatory response [28]. The lack of IL-10 in the supernatants from both PAMs
and THP-1-derived M0 cells indicates an early stage of infection with
no apparent progression.
Our study found an upregulated expression of TLR3, which was recognized as a
receptor in sensing the ASFV [16]. It was shown that the virus inhibits TLRs in
pig macrophages as a strategy to avoid its recognition and efficiently replicate
in these cells. For example, the pI329L gene was shown to target
TIR-domain-containing adaptor-inducing interferon- (TRIF), a key
MyD88-independent adaptor molecule, thus interfering with TLR3-stimulated
activation [29]. Another gene, pA276R, inhibits IFN-
induction via both the TLR3 and the cytosolic pathways by targeting IRF3 [30].
Given that ASFV replication occurs in the cytoplasm [31] and there is a lack of
information about the activation of TLR3 from the cell surface, the upregulation
of TLR3 in human macrophages might be reflective of the virus entering and being
present in M0 cells. TLR3 causes the activation of the TRIF-dependent
downstream pathway, which in turn activates transcription factors, such as
IRF3/7, NF-B, and the activator protein 1 (AP-1), thus mediating the
production of type I IFNs, proinflammatory cytokines, and chemokines,
respectively [32]. The observed elevation in TNF- production implies an
activated NF-B response, at least within the context of our in
vitro experimental model. Thus, upregulation of TLR3, the accessory molecule
CD80 on macrophages lacking HLA-DR, may indicate a modulation of the
antigen-presenting capabilities of the cells at the early stage of in
vitro infection. Alternatively, it could be a component of the specific evasion
strategy employed by the virus, providing additional confirmation of the virus’s
entry into macrophages.
The virulence of ASFV isolated in pigs was shown to be dependent on their
ability to regulate the expression of cytokines derived from macrophages, which
are important for the development of host protective responses through partially
unknown mechanisms that are triggered by the virus in the early stages of
cellular infection [3, 26]. However, in the human organism, viral replication is
likely blocked at an early stage of infection of the target macrophages. Our
study found that the virus elicited a significant response from M0
cells that had been infected for 48 hours. Notably, increased surface expression
of LAMP-1 indicates lysosome exocytosis of M0 cells [33]. Engagement
of co-stimulatory CD80, scavenger receptors, chemokine receptor CXCR2, and TLRs.
In PAM cells, the virus can alter cellular functions rapidly within 24 hours of
infection. When infected, this virus activity is slowed—the implementation is
carried out up to 48 hpi.
Cytoplasmic viral factories, characteristic of ASFV, for example, on
Feulgen-stained preparations [11], are not detected when infecting M0
cells, which suggests that either the virus does not replicate or replicates in
an insignificant undetectable amount. This coincides with the data obtained from
the quantitative analysis of genome copies and infectious titers (Fig. 1).
Later stages of virus replication, such as ASFV egress, are very difficult to
trace. Even if we assume that the virus can replicate with a decrease in
infectious titers, this is unlikely, even though we showed the presence of the
virus up to the third passage.
5. Conclusion
When examining the replication of the ASFV in M0, it becomes evident
that the virus can initiate the replication cycle by first entering human
macrophages, losing its capsid, starting transcription of many of its proteins,
and partially realizing their functions. ASFV in M0 implements
numerous functions to alter cell activity; however, the timing of these
functional changes is slower in M0 compared with susceptible cells,
such as PAMs. Despite these alterations in cell activity, ASFV cannot complete
the full replication cycle in human macrophages, which is evidenced by the
absence of viral factories typically observed in sensitive cells and the decrease
in infectious viral titers with each subsequent passage. These findings suggest
that molecular limitations within human macrophages may at least partially
restrict the complete replication of ASFV. Understanding the factors that hinder
viral replication in M0 can provide valuable insights into the
host–virus interactions and the mechanisms underlying the resistance of human
macrophages to the ASFV.
Availability of Data and Materials
Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding
author upon reasonable request.
Author Contributions
ZK, GM were responsible for the conceptualization, data curation, writing –
original draft, writing – review editing. LH, LA, AA, DP, HA were responsible
for formal analysis. SG, DP, LH, HA, AA, LA, AP, SH were responsible for
investigation. AP and SH also were responsible for editing process of the
manuscript. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All
authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated
sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the
work.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
The studies were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute
of Molecular Biology NAS RA (IRB 00004079, 2013; Protocol N5 from 25 May 2018).
The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute
of Molecular Biology NAS RA (IRB 06042021/1, 2021).
Acknowledgment
Not applicable.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.