- Academic Editors
†These authors contributed equally.
Objective: The effect of the daily consumption of a low-fat yogurt (150
g) enriched with Platelet-Activating Factor receptor (PAF-R) antagonists, or the
plain one, on gut microbiota and faecal metabolites was investigated in healthy
overweight subjects. Methods: A randomized, three-arm, double-blind,
placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was performed that lasted 8 weeks. Blood
and stools were collected and analyzed before and after the intervention.
Results: Our findings revealed that the intake of the enriched yogurt resulted
in a significant increase in the levels of Bifidobacterium spp.,
Clostridium perfringens group and Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes (F/B)
ratio. On the other hand, a significant increase in the levels of
Lactobacillus and C. perfringens group was detected after the
intake of the plain yogurt. The increase in the levels of C. perfringens
group was inversely associated with the plasma catabolic enzyme of PAF, namely
LpPLA
During the last decades, a significant number of studies have explored the role of gut microbiota in several pathophysiological conditions including obesity, cancer, inflammatory bowel diseases, metabolic syndrome and neurological diseases [1, 2]. Diet components as well as dietary habits have been implicated in the modulation of the gut microbiota composition and functionality [3, 4]. Fermented foods and especially dairy fermented products containing high populations of live microorganisms have been tested for their efficacy in the modulation of the gut microbiota composition [5, 6].
Yogurt, a well-known fermented dairy product, is included in almost all the heart-healthy dietary patterns, while it should be noted that the benefits of low-fat and fat-free compared to the full-fat dairy products are still under discussion [7, 8]. Reviews and meta-analyses have concluded that yogurt consumption has an inverse association with the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D), whilst no significant association seems to exist between yogurt consumption and the risk of stroke, hypertension, coronary artery disease (CAD) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Meanwhile, yogurt consumption and risk of all-cause and CVD mortality has been inversely associated [9, 10, 11]. The results from a recent meta-analysis suggest that dairy intake might improve inflammatory biomarkers but without taking into account the yogurt intake per se as the real cause of the observed changes [12].
Yogurt is a fermented food containing 10
We have previously demonstrated that the daily consumption for 8 weeks of a
yogurt, fortified with an olive oil pomace extract (OOPLE), attenuated ex
vivo platelet-rich plasma (PRP) aggregation induced by PAF, decreased IL-6 and
IL-10 levels, and also favorably modulated Platelet-activating factor (PAF)
metabolic enzymes, in healthy mainly overweight adults [18, 19]. It has been
demonstrated that the OOPLE enrichment contains PAF receptor (PAF-R) inhibitors
[20] and has the capacity to prevent the development of atherosclerotic plaques
in rabbits fed a high cholesterol diet and also to regress the formed plaques in
the same animal model [21]. PAF, chemically identified as
1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphocholine [22] is a potent
endogenous lipid mediator that induces platelet activation, aggregation and
secretion as well as mobilization of intracellular calcium, while its intravenous
administration in experimental animals leads to anaphylactic shock and even in
death in higher concentrations [23]. PAF is implicated in a variety of
pathological conditions where inflammation, thrombosis and immune activation has
a recognized role [24, 25, 26, 27]. More specifically, PAF binding to its receptor
(PAF-R), a G-protein-coupled receptor expressed in many cell types, triggers
signaling pathways that result in the activation of a variety of kinases, in the
production of nitric oxide and in the production of arachidonic acid metabolites
through the activation of cytoplasmic phospholipase A
The role of PAF in the development of inflammatory bowel diseases has been well-established in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) where it has been reported that PAF-AH reduces the incidence of NEC [36]. In addition, PAF-R is constitutively expressed in human intestinal epithelium [37]. This data has led the authors to suggest that PAF is produced by the human intestinal epithelium and exerts autocrine and/or paracrine action [37]. Additionally, PAF upregulates both Toll-Like Receptors 4 (TLR4) mRNA and protein expression in intestinal epithelial cell lines and the PAF-PAF-R complex interacts with and subsequently activates TLR4 [38, 39]. These receptors recognize specific repetitive patterns associated with bacterial products such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and mediate cellular responses that lead also to inflammation [40]. It has also been reported that PAF-R also acts as a recognition receptor for the phosphorylcholine group of Gram-positive lipoteichoic acid (LTA) as well as for the Gram-negative LPS [41, 42].
According to the above, the aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of the daily consumption of a low-fat yogurt fortified with PAF-R antagonists, or the plain one, on gut microbiota and faecal metabolites. Additionally, potential associations between inflammatory indices, hemostatic markers and PAF metabolic enzymes with gut microbiota characteristics and faecal metabolites in humans were investigated. For this purpose, a randomized, three-arm, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial was performed in apparently healthy mainly overweight adults.
The study protocol, the intervention as well as the inclusion and the exclusion criteria have been presented elsewhere [18, 19, 43]. Briefly, the trial included 92 apparently healthy participants aged 35–65 years old that were randomly assigned into the three arms, 31 in Group A, 30 in Group B and 31 in Group C. Group A was advised to consume at most one yogurt every 14 days, Group B consumed one serving of plain yogurt every day (150 g) and Group C consumed one serving of yogurt enriched with OOPLE on a daily base (150 g). Both yogurts had the same composition apart from the OOPLE enrichment. The intervention lasted 8 weeks and 4 participants did not complete the 8-week intervention. In addition, stool samples were provided before and after the intervention from 51 adults (58% participation rate), specifically from 11 participants in Group A, 17 in Group B and 23 in Group C. The study took place at the Department of Nutrition and Dietetics of Harokopio University in Athens, Greece, followed the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (1989) of the World Medical Association, was approved by the Bioethics Committee of Harokopio University (40/30-10-2013) and was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02259205). The CONSORT guidelines for parallel group randomized trials have been adopted [44].
The extraction method for OOPLE as well as the method for the production of the
low-fat enriched yogurt have been previously described [19]. The Greek dairy
industry (MEVGAL SA) manufactured both yogurts flavored with strawberry (16%
w/w) in a pilot scale line during the whole duration of the trial and
physiochemically tested their concentration in macronutrients and microbial
parameters. Lactic acid bacteria were measured at 5.1
The methodology for all the measurements has been previously presented [18]. Briefly, a Mindray BC-3000 hematology analyzer (Mindray, Shenzhen, China) was used for the blood count in whole blood with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) as anticoagulant. Serum glucose, triacylglycerols, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were assessed enzymatically with an ACE biochemical analyzer (Schiapparelli Biosystems, Fairfield, NJ, USA). An immunoenzymometric assay was used for the estimation of serum insulin (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria). The calculation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was performed by the Friedewald formula. C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, adiponectin and IL-10 were evaluated in serum by commercially available ELISA kits (CRP and adiponectin from Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vienna, Austria; IL-6 from Tecan Trading AG, Männedorf, Switzerland; and IL-10 from BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). A Chromogenic Activity Kit (Assaypro LLC, St. Charles, MO, USA) was used to determine the activity of Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA) in citrate plasma.
The procedure used has been already reported [18]. Briefly, trisodium citrate
(Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as anticoagulant during blood
collection and subsequently platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was obtained by
centrifugation followed by further centrifugation of the residue to obtain
platelet-poor plasma (PPP). Various concentrations of PAF were tested for their
ability to induce human PRP aggregation presenting different heights of
reversible and irreversible curves by light transmission aggregometry in a
Chrono-Log (Havertown, PA, USA) aggregometer (model 440VS). The height of the
aggregation curve of minimum-irreversible platelet aggregation of human PRP was
defined as the 100% aggregation. The concentration of PAF that induces platelet
aggregation equal to 50% (EC
The procedure used as well as the methods of PAF metabolic enzymes
determination, have been already reported [19]. Briefly, the activities of the
PAF metabolic enzymes namely, two isoforms of Lyso-PAF acetyltransferase
(Lyso-PAF AT), the activity of PAF choline phosphotransferase (PAF-CPT) and the
activity of PAF intracellular catabolic enzyme, namely PAF-acetylhydrolase
(PAF-AH), were determined in isolated leucocyte homogenates. The two isoforms of
Lyso-PAF AT were the one that is activated under inflammatory conditions in the
presence of calcium (Lyso-PAF ATC), while the other one is calcium independent
and the assay was performed in the presence of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
(EDTA) (Lyso-PAF ATE). Lastly, the activity of the plasma isoform of PAF-AH,
lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A
Stool collection procedure and gut microbiota analysis using both plate count
techniques and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) were
performed as previously described [4]. Baseline culturable gut microbiota members
were expressed as a log
Frozen faecal samples were 1:3 diluted with 0.9% saline and faecal SCFAs concentrations were then assessed with the use of capillary gas chromatography as previously described in detail [46]. Total volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and individual SCFAs concentrations were expressed as µmol/g of sample and molar ratios (% of VFAs) of acetate, propionate, butyrate, branched-chain SCFAs (BSCFAs; iso-butyrate, iso-valerate, iso-caproic acid) and other SCFAs (valerate, caproic acid and heptanoic acid) were further calculated [46]. Moisture and pH of fresh samples were also determined as previously described [47].
The Kolmogorov–Smirnov criterion was used to test normal distribution of data.
Normally distributed continuous variables were displayed as means
The % change was calculated by the following formula: Final value-Baseline
value / Baseline value
The baseline characteristics as well as the hematologic markers of all the participants that provided stool samples according to their intervention groups are shown in Table 1. Biochemical markers and blood count parameters did not differ among groups at baseline with the exception of granulocytes that were higher in the control group (Group A) than in the enriched yogurt group (Group C) (p = 0.02). It should note that participants in Group B had higher BMI, systolic blood pressure, and triacylglycerols, even though no statistically significant difference was detected. During the 8 weeks of intervention, the participants retained their dietary macronutrient intake and physical activity as well (data not shown). Furthermore, the majority of the classical biochemical markers and blood count parameters did not present any significant change. A slight decrease was recorded in red blood cells (p = 0.04) and in their distribution width (RDW-SD, p = 0.02) in Group A as well as in the mean corpuscular volume (MCV, p = 0.03) in Group B compared to baseline levels, all of them remaining into the normal range after the intervention. The intake of the plain yogurt (Group B) also led to a significant decrease of systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by approximately 5–6 mmHg (p = 0.004, p = 0.045, respectively) at 8 weeks, resulting in blood pressure values closer to the baseline ones of the other groups. Comparison of the % changes of evaluated parameters revealed that the participants in Group A resulted in decreased number of granulocytes compared to Group B (p = 0.016) and C (p = 0.016). Additionally, lower RDW-SD values were detected in Group A compared to the yogurt groups and especially compared to Group C (p = 0.012) after the intervention. However, all values were in normal range (Supplementary Table 2).
Group Α | Group Β | Group C | p | |
(Control group, n = 11) | (Plain yogurt, n = 17) | (Enriched yogurt, n = 23) | ||
Men/Women | 5/6 | 9/8 | 10/13 | 0.82 |
Age (years) | 49.7 |
49.6 |
47.4 |
0.70 |
Smoking (Yes/No) | 6/5 | 7/10 | 7/16 | 0.53 |
BMI (kg/m |
25.8 |
29.1 |
27.0 |
0.08 |
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 119.4 |
131.8 |
121.0 |
0.06 |
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 76.6 |
77.8 |
74.2 |
0.48 |
Glucose (mg/dL) | 87.9 |
94.7 |
95.3 |
0.61 |
Triacylglycerols (mg/dL) | 106.9 |
131.3 |
115.9 |
0.48 |
Total-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 200.8 |
214.4 |
214.2 |
0.56 |
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) | 53.4 |
53.8 |
54.1 |
0.99 |
LDL- cholesterol (mg/dL) | 126.1 |
134.3 |
136.9 |
0.63 |
Insulin (µU/mL) | 9.7 |
12.0 |
9.5 |
0.33 |
WBC (10 |
6.9 |
6.0 |
5.7 |
0.10 |
LYMPH (10 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
1.9 |
0.96 |
MID (10 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.35 |
GRAN (10 |
4.6 |
3.7 |
3.4 |
0.03 |
RBC (10 |
4.7 |
4.7 |
4.6 |
0.78 |
Hct (%) | 39.8 |
41.3 |
41.0 |
0.74 |
Hgb (g/dL) | 13.3 |
14.4 |
14.1 |
0.35 |
MCV (fL) | 82.5 |
84.2 |
84.9 |
0.68 |
RDW-CV (%) | 14.0 |
13.5 |
13.5 |
0.32 |
RDW-SD (fL) | 40.4 |
39.6 |
39.8 |
0.82 |
Platelets (10 |
265 |
253 |
243 |
0.68 |
MPV (fL) | 7.9 |
7.8 |
8.1 |
0.32 |
PDW (fL) | 15.8 |
15.5 |
15.4 |
0.68 |
PCT (%) | 0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.76 |
PLT/LYMPH | 144 |
134 |
137 |
0.82 |
Data are presented as means
BMI, Body Mass Index; Hct, Hematocrit; HDL, High density lipoprotein; Hgb,
Hemoglobin; GRAN, Granulocytes; LDL, Low density lipoprotein; LYMPH, Lymphocytes;
MCV, Mean Corpuscular Volume; MID, Mid-range cells; MPV, Mean Platelet Volume;
PCT, Plateletcrit; PDW, Platelet distribution Width; PLT, Platelets; RBC, Red
Blood Cells; RDW-CV, Red Distribution Width-Coefficient Variation; RDW-SD, Red
Distribution Width-Standard Deviation; WBC, White Blood Cells.
The inflammation and hemostatic markers as well as ex vivo platelet
aggregation against PAF expressed as PAF EC
Group Α | Group Β | Group C | p | |
(Control group, n = 11) | (Plain yogurt, n = 17) | (Enriched yogurt, n = 23) | ||
CRP (mg/L) | 2.6 |
2.2 |
1.6 |
0.24 |
Adiponectin (µg/mL) | 5.4 |
4.6 |
5.6 |
0.62 |
IL-6 (pg/mL) | 0.6 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
0.02 |
IL-10 (pg/mL) | 2.7 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
0.28 |
PAI-1 (mAU/mL) | 103.1 |
120.8 |
100.7 |
0.54 |
tPA (mIU/mL) | 0.063 (0.051, 0.092) | 0.067 (0.043, 0.085) | 0.072 (0.059, 0.092) | 0.48 |
EC |
33.5 (23.4, 156.5) | 42.7 (24.8, 161.0) | 33.3 (26.4, 68.2) | 0.71 |
Data are presented as means
CRP, C-reactive protein; EC
The specific activities of PAF biosynthetic as well as catabolic enzymes at
baseline, are presented in Table 3. Besides the difference in the specific
activity of Lyso-PAF ATE that was significant lower in Group A compared to Group
B (p = 0.001) and C (p = 0.002), no other difference was
detected. After the 8 weeks of intervention, Lyso-PAF ATC activity was higher in
Group A (p = 0.04) and Lp-PLA
Group Α | Group Β | Group C | p | ||||||||
(Control group, n = 11) | (Plain yogurt, n = 17) | (Enriched yogurt, n = 23) | Among groups | ||||||||
Baseline | End | % |
Baseline | End | % |
Baseline | End | % |
Baseline | % | |
PAF-CPT (pmol/mg/min) | 240.8 |
255.3 |
6.5 |
167.6 |
173.3 |
0.4 |
185.0 |
166.2 |
8.53 |
0.309 | 0.907 |
Lyso-PAF ATC (pmol/mg/min) | 64.5 (35.5, 123.8) | 85.3* (40.3, 156.6) | 16.1 (–1.9, 26.5) | 98.3 (65.9, 105.6) | 74.1 (55.4, 111.5) | –19.4 (–36.5, 25.5) | 63.8 (33.3, 93.0) | 70.6 (37.6, 108.0) | –1.0 (–20.6, 29.0) | 0.229 | 0.095 |
Lyso-PAF ATE (pmol/mg/min) | 29.3 |
31.5 |
8.6 |
65.5 |
61.7 |
–4.2 |
59.8 |
57.0 |
4.25 |
0.001 | 0.480 |
PAF-AH (pmol/mg/min) | 64.7 |
62.0 |
7.7 |
54.6 |
52.8 |
3.6 |
57.2 |
58.3 |
10.1 |
0.644 | 0.911 |
LpPLA |
24.6 |
25.4 |
1.5 (–6.9, 12.1) | 30.0 |
30.7 |
0.8 (–6.1, 4.4) | 27.7 |
26.4 |
–3.3 (–7.8, 0.0) | 0.101 | 0.710 |
LpPLA |
0.2 |
0.2 |
1.03 (–5.86, 3.67) | 0.2 |
0.2 |
–3.46 (–9.59 5.69) | 0.2 |
0.2 |
–4.29 (–8.58, 3.42) | 0.433 | 0.707 |
Data are presented as means
%
The participants allocated in yogurt groups (Groups B and C) did not report any
severe gastrointestinal side effects or significant changes in stool frequency
and consistency, although increase of abdominal bloating and/or borborygmi were
the most frequently reported side effects, as it has been reported elsewhere
[18]. All participants reported full compliance with the intervention. In
addition, stool characteristics, gut microbiota qPCR-based analysis and major
SCFAs (acetate, propionate, butyrate) did not present any difference among study
groups at baseline (Tables 4,5). Culture-based analysis revealed higher baseline
levels of Clostridium perfringens in plain yogurt compared to control
group (p = 0.010) and enriched yogurt group (p = 0.035)
(Supplementary Table 3). Significant baseline differences were detected
in the concentration and molar ratios of iso-butyrate acid with Group A
presenting the highest values from all groups (p
Group Α | Group Β | Group C | p | |||||||
(Control group, n = 11) | (Plain yogurt, n = 17) | (Enriched yogurt, n = 23) | Among Groups | |||||||
Baseline | End of study | % |
Baseline | End of study | % |
Baseline | End of study | % |
||
Stool characteristics | ||||||||||
Faecal pH | 6.9 |
7.1 |
0.3 (0.3, 1.6) | 6.9 |
6.9 |
2.3 (–4.4, 9.2) | 6.8 |
7.0. |
6.1 (–6.5, 9.7) | 0.661 |
Faecal moisture (%) | 69.0 |
70.2 |
1.8 |
71.6 |
72.7 |
1.9 |
73.6 |
72.1 |
–1.2 |
0.451 |
qPCR-based gut microbiota analysis (log | ||||||||||
Firmicutes | 11.7 |
11.7 |
0.1 |
11.6 |
11.7 |
0.5 |
11.7 |
11.8 |
0.7 |
0.318 |
Bacteroidetes | 11.1 |
11.1 |
–0.9 (–1.5, –0.1) | 11.1 |
11.1 |
–0.2 (–1.2, 1.0) | 11.1 |
11.1 |
–0.4 (–1.1, 1.9) | 0.556 |
Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio | 1.05 |
1.06 |
1.08 (0.0, 1.96) | 1.05 (1.04, 1.07) | 1.06 (1.05, 1.07) | 0.95 (0.0, 1.45) | 1.06 (1.05, 1.07) | 1.06* (1.06, 1.08) | 0.95 (0.0, 1.89) | 0.905 |
Bifidobacterium spp. | 10.3 (8.8, 10.9) | 10.2 (8.9, 10.9) | –0.7 (–1.7, 2.6) | 10.6 (10.2, 10.8) | 10.4 (9.9, 10.9) | –0.6 (–3.1, 3.3) | 10.6 (10.0, 10.8) | 10.5* (10.2, 11.0) | 2.4 (–0.9, 4.3) | 0.185 |
Lactobacillus group | 7.7 |
7.8 |
1.0 (0.7, 1.2) | 7.8 |
8.1 |
2.1 (–1.7, 8.3) | 7.6 |
7.8 |
1.2 (–6.4, 6.8) | 0.616 |
C. perfringens group | 8.1 |
8.0 |
–1.2 |
8.2 |
8.6 |
5.9 |
8.0 (7.6–8.9) | 8.9* (8.1–9.1) | 4.7 |
0.001 |
Data are presented as means
%
Group Α | Group Β | Group C | p | ||||||||
(Control group, n = 11) | (Plain yogurt, n = 17) | (Enriched yogurt, n = 23) | Among Groups | ||||||||
Baseline | End of study | % |
Baseline | End of study | % |
Baseline | End of study | % |
Baseline | % | |
SCFAs (concentration, µmol/g of wet faeces) | |||||||||||
Total Volatile Fatty Acids (VFAs) | 68.9 |
72.7 |
11.5 (0.6, 17.4) | 76.3 |
80.2 |
0.6 (–32.5, 46.9) | 82.6 |
71.5 |
–27.6 (–44.4, 46.1) | 0.552 | 0.119 |
Acetate | 32.1 |
35.9 |
23.8 (4.1, 35.6) | 35.9 |
37.9 |
–0.92 (–28.5, 44.5) | 38.4 |
35.4 |
–22.0 (–38.9, 44.6) | 0.553 | 0.122 |
Propionate | 9.9 (5.1, 18.2) | 11.3 (7.2, 15.5) | 2.7 (–4.5, 14.0) | 14.3 |
13.9 |
1.6 (–29.5, 21.5) | 15.2 (11.6, 18.1) | 11.9 (7.1, 14.6) | –27.7 (–51.1, 23.2) | 0.849 | 0.199 |
Butyrate | 18.2 |
18.2 |
2.3 (–1.3, 11.1) | 21.8 |
23.4 |
–23.6 (–35.9, 67.9) | 21.4 (15.1, 27.0) | 18.2 (8.0, 22.8) | –26.3 (–59.8, 29.8) | 0.569 | 0.212 |
BSCFAs | 2.1 (1.9, 3.3) | 2.5 (2.0, 2.8) | –0.2 (–1.3, 15.5) | 2.0 (1.4, 2.9) | 1.8 (1.5, 3.4) | 12.4 (–22.6, 57.0) | 2.1 (1.7, 3.0) | 2.1 (1.7, 3.5) | 16.5 (–31.3, 43.8) | 0.462 | 0.743 |
Iso-butyrate | 1.2 |
1.0 (0.8, 1.3) | –1.5 (–7.5, 7.5) | 0.5 |
0.6 (0.4, 1.3) | 18.9 (–13.0, 90.2) | 0.6 |
0.6 (0.4, 1.3) | 15.7 (–31.3, 43.7) | 0.005 | 0.316 |
Iso-valerate | 1.1 (1.1, 1.7) | 1.2 (0.9, 1.7) | –3.0 (–21.0, 31.2) | 1.6 (0.8, 1.7) | 1.3 (0.8, 1.3) | 1.8 (–53.1, 29.9) | 1.6 |
1.6 |
5.9 (–33.5, 47.7) | 0.972 | 0.598 |
Iso-caproic | 0.0 (0.0–0.07) | 0.0 (0.0–0.07) | – | 0.0 (0.0–0.07) | 0.0 (0.0–0.03) | – | 0.0 (0.0–0.06) | 0.0 (0.0–0.06) | – | 0.962 | ND |
Other SCFAs | 1.3 (0.9, 3.4) | 1.3 (0.9, 2.8) | –2.3 (–17.0, 14.6) | 2.2 (1.4, 3.0) | 2.0 (1.1, 3.1) | –21.9 (–33.9, 52.9) | 2.7 (2.2, 3.3) | 2.1 (1.5, 3.3) | –11.0 (–47.6, 19.2) | 0.107 | 0.456 |
Valerate | 0.9 (0.8, 2.3) | 1.1 (0.6, 2.0) | –4.0 (–14.3, 16.7) | 1.5 (1.1, 1.9) | 1.3 (0.9, 2.2) | –21.1 (–42.3, 49.2) | 1.8 |
1.6 |
–10.6 (–45.6, 35.9) | 0.256 | 0.900 |
Caproic (hexanoic) | 0.2 |
0.3 (0.1, 0.8) | –10.8 (–25.4, 23.5) | 0.3 |
0.5 (0.2, 1.1) | –1.5 (–53.9, 110.9) | 1.1 |
0.5* (0.3, 1.0) | –41.1 (–68.5, 13.1) | 0.013 | 0.290 |
Heptanoic | 0.04 |
0.06 (0.0, 0.1) | – | 0.06 |
0.06 (0.0, 0.2) | – | 0.1 |
0.1 (0.0, 0.2) | – | 0.046 | ND |
SCFAs (Molar ratios, % total VFAs) | |||||||||||
Acetate | 49.2 |
51.9 |
5.9 |
48.2 |
49.0 |
2.1 |
46.3 |
48.6 |
5.9 |
0.358 | 0.623 |
Propionate | 18.5 |
17.4 |
–5.3 |
18.9 |
17.9 |
–0.7 |
18.9 |
18.6 |
–0.1 |
0.953 | 0.780 |
Butyrate | 24.2 |
23.2 |
–2.9 |
26.6 |
25.9 |
–2.7 |
27.2 |
24.8 |
–6.9 |
0.446 | 0.748 |
BSCFAs | 5.0 |
4.6 |
–12.0 (–15.2, 2.7) |
3.2 |
4.2 (2.0, 5.2) | 23.3 (–7.3, 104.4) |
3.3 |
3.9 (2.4, 5.3) | 45.2 (–29.8, 121.2) |
0.052 | 0.101 |
Iso-butyrate | 2.1 |
2.0 |
–9.7 (–17.2, 1.5) | 0.8 |
1.1 (0.5, 2.2) | 14.9 (–21.7, 102.7) | 0.9 |
1.0 (0.7, 1.8) | 29.4 (–20.0, 123.8) | 0.276 | |
Iso-valerate | 2.8 |
2.6 |
–13.2 (–21.3, 4.3) | 2.2 |
2.4 |
11.2 (–37.9, 66.6) | 2.3 |
2.7 |
50.8 (–30.4, 111.3) | 0.587 | 0.120 |
Iso-caproic | 0.0 (0.0–0.2) | 0.0 (0.0–0.1) | – | 0.0 (0.0–0.1) | 0.0 (0.0–0.0) | – | 0.0 (0.0–0.1) | 0.0 (0.0–0.1) | – | 0.882 | ND |
Other SCFAs | 3.1 |
2.9 |
–3.2 (–17.4, 1.0) | 3.1 |
3.3 |
0.5 (–17.8, 30.6) | 3.9 |
3.9 |
–6.7 (–23.7, 44.5) | 0.242 | 0.716 |
Valerate | 2.2 |
2.0 |
–8.9 (–20.4, 2.4) | 2.1 |
2.2 |
1.3 (–16.9, 25.3) | 2.3 |
2.5 |
1.0 (–12.7, 40.3) | 0.745 | 0.226 |
Caproic (hexanoic) | 0.6 |
0.7 (0.1, 0.8) | –14.3 (–26.8, 6.0) | 0.9 |
1.0 |
18.5 (–28.8, 89.1) | 1.4 |
1.1 |
–32.9 (–45.6, 55.0) | 0.047 | 0.366 |
Heptanoic | 0.1 |
0.1 |
– | 0.1 (0.0–0.1) | 0.1 (0.0–0.3) | – | 0.2 |
0.2 |
– | 0.121 | ND |
Data are presented as means
%
In Group A, a significant drop in molar ratio of other SCFAs was detected after
8 weeks of intervention, which could be rather attributed to the decrease of
molar ratio of valerate (p = 0.051). A trend for increased molar ratio
of acetate (p = 0.065) and decreased levels of C. perfringens
group (p = 0.059) were further detected. In Group B, a significant
increase in baseline levels of Lactobacillus (p = 0.034) and
C. perfringens (p = 0.032) group was observed after 8 weeks of
intervention while no significant differences were detected in the concentrations
and molar ratio of SCFAs. In Group C, a significant increase in baseline levels
of C. perfringens group (p = 0.014), Bifidobacterium
spp. (p = 0.021) and Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio (F/B ratio,
p = 0.035) (mean F/B ratio increase of 0.01/g faeces) was observed after
the intervention. In the case of bifidobacteria, four subjects exhibited a rather
extreme
Comparison of % changes of tested parameters revealed a significant higher %
increase in C. perfringens group levels in both enriched (p =
0.002) and plain yogurt (p = 0.012) groups after the 8 week-intervention
compared to control. Likewise, a higher % increase in molar ratio of BSCFAs was
detected for both enriched (p = 0.007) and plain yogurt (p =
0.057) groups after the 8 week-intervention compared to control. Moreover, plain
yogurt had a trend for higher % change in iso-butyrate concentration compared to
control (p = 0.086), whereas enriched yogurt group had a trend for
higher % increase in iso-valerate concentration (p = 0.074), but also
for greater % decrease of TVFAs (p = 0.058), acetate (p =
0.080) and propionate (p = 0.074) levels compared to control. Based on
analysis, no significant difference was detected in % changes of tested
parameters between plain and enriched yogurt groups (Tables 4,5). In ‘control vs.
overall yogurt analysis’, a significant higher % increase in C.
perfringens group levels (p
Results from linear regression analysis after sex, age and BMI adjustment are
presented as
Group B | ||||
(Plain yogurt, n = 17) | ||||
C. perfringens group | Lactobacillus group | Bifidobacterium spp. | F/B | |
Beta-Coefficient (standard error) | ||||
EC |
ns | ns | –8.319*** (2.492) | ns |
Lyso-PAF ATE | –1.099*** (0.337) | ns | ns | ns |
PAF-AH | ns | –3.343** (1.442) | ns | ns |
LpPLA |
–0.484* (0.238) | ns | ns | ns |
Group C | ||||
(Enriched yogurt, n = 23) | ||||
EC |
5.976* (2.880) | ns | ns | ns |
LpPLA |
–0.511* (0.282) | ns | ns | ns |
LpPLA |
ns | ns | ns | 5.022* (2.709) |
Beta-Coefficients and their corresponding standard errors were obtained from
linear regression analysis after adjusting for age, sex and body mass index. Gut
microbiota was considered the independent variable.
EC
In Group C, the augmentation of C. perfringens group had a trend for
inverse correlation with the specific activity of the plasma catabolic enzyme,
LpPLA
In Group B, the increased levels of C. perfringens group had also a
trend for inverse correlation with the specific activity of the plasma catabolic
enzyme, LpPLA
The specific activity of PAF-AH was inversely correlated with the levels of
butyrate (–0.366
The decrease of IL-10 in Group C was positively correlated with the reduction of
the concentration of butyrate (0.175
The present clinical trial aimed to investigate whether the intake of a yogurt on a daily basis, fortified with a polar lipid extract of olive-oil by-products that contains PAF-R antagonists, could affect gut microbiota and faecal metabolites in apparently healthy, mainly overweight, participants. According to the results, the consumption of the enriched yogurt resulted in a significant increase in the levels of Bifidobacterium spp., C. perfringens group and F/B ratio. On the other hand, a significant increase in the levels of Lactobacillus and C. perfringens group was observed after the intake of the plain yogurt. Additionally, a higher % increase in molar ratio of BSCFAs was detected for both yogurt groups after the 8 week-intervention compared to control. The consumption of the enriched yogurt also resulted in a significant drop in faecal caproic levels and a trend for lower ratio of butyrate to total VFAs compared to baseline levels.
Previous intervention trials in adults have reported increased levels of bifidobacteria and in some cases lactobacilli populations after daily yogurt intake [15, 48, 49] even though no effect in faecal bifidobacteria has also been stated [50, 51]. No differences were detected in the faecal levels of clostridia and E. coli in previous studies [48, 51], while in a study that included over 65 years old Irish subjects, the presence of C. perfringens was negatively correlated with the number of Bifidobacterium spp. recovered [52]. Similar bacterial changes, with a concomitant decrease in Bacteroides vulgatus levels, after yogurt consumption have been previously attributed to the normalization of the bacterial density groups, probably reflecting a more balanced gut microbiota profile [53, 54]. Furthermore, it should be noted that despite the increase of C. perfringens group levels after yogurt consumption in our study, no diarrheic episodes or severe gastrointestinal side effects were reported during the intervention period. The increase in the levels of Bifidobacterium spp. observed after the intake of the enriched yogurt may be also due to the existence of olive pomace carbohydrates and polysaccharides since it has been documented that fructo-oligosaccharides promote the growth of endogenous beneficial organisms such as bifidobacteria [55].
It should note that the OOPLE extract contained 30% w/w maltodextrin (MDX) as a protective colloid for emulsions as well as an emulsion polymerization material, resulting in an intake of approximately 0.23 g MDX/day. It has been reported that MDX dosages ranging between 0.5 and 15 g/d for 1–16 weeks resulted in a significant increase of various Firmicutes members, in increased acetate and propionate levels, in decreased BSCFAs while the effect of MDX on butyrate levels varied between studies [56, 57]. The significant increase in F/B ratio after the consumption of the enriched yogurt was probably due to the raise of baseline Firmicutes levels and could be merely attributed to the presence of MDX in the food matrix, though daily intake of MDX in our study was much lower compared to the previous reported. Furthermore, elevated F/B ratio may be resulted by components present in the OOPLE extract of the yogurt, since a similar rise in F/B ratio has already been documented in mice fed with a virgin olive oil enriched diet [58].
In our study, SCFAs analysis indicated a significant drop in faecal caproic levels and a trend for lower ratio of butyrate to total VFAs after the consumption of the enriched yogurt. Caproic acid, also characterized as medium chain fatty acid (MCFA), seems to exert pro-inflammatory properties through the activation of p38 MAPK signaling and also its serum concentration is increased in multiple sclerosis patients, although its role in other pathological conditions is still under consideration [59, 60]. It has been suggested that caproic acid is produced from the elongation pathway of acetyl-CoA, -the product of lactate oxidation-, resulting in the formation of butyryl-CoA and hexanoyl-CoA [61]. The decrease of both butyrate and caproic acid detected after the intake of the enriched yogurt is consistent with the above biosynthetic pathway. Additionally, a significant higher % change in molar ratio of BSCFAs was detected for both enriched and plain yogurt group after the 8 week-intervention compared to control. Even though, no significant differences were detected between yogurt groups in the % changes of the gut microbiota and faecal metabolites, plain yogurt had a trend for higher % change in iso-butyrate concentration whereas enriched yogurt group had a trend for higher % increase in iso-valerate concentration. The elevated BSCFAs and specifically the increase in iso-butyrate and iso-valerate levels after yogurt consumption was somewhat expected since it has been documented that they are mainly produced during protein fermentation and especially from valine and leucine degradation by the intestinal microbiota carried out mainly by genera Bacteroides and Clostridium [62, 63, 64].
The relation between gut microbiota and PAF metabolism has not been studied with
the exception of one study that revealed no connection between
Akkermansia muciniphila and LpPLA
Daily low-fat yogurt consumption for 8 weeks led to a significant increase in
the levels of C. perfringens group that was inversely associated with
the plasma catabolic enzyme of PAF, namely LpPLA
The participants were apparently healthy overweight adults of Greek ethnicity with medium adherence to Mediterranean diet, thus the findings may not apply to different population groups. Even though the study protocol included 92 participants, stool samples were provided before and after the intervention from only 51 adults (58% participation rate). Additionally, the participants of Group B that provided stool samples presented a metabolically slightly less healthy profile that may have influenced their response to the intervention. PAF levels were not evaluated that would provide a direct information regarding its relation with specific microbial species. Gut microbiota diversity could be further analyzed in-depth by e.g., 16S rRNA sequencing. Also, we did not measure other microbial-derived metabolites such as trimethylamine, a precursor of trimethylamine N-oxide that has been associated with platelet activity. On the other hand, the study design (i.e., randomized, double-blind) eliminated any potential sources of bias (i.e., selection, performance and detection bias). Lastly, subjective tools and methods, i.e., self-administered records, phone calls were used to evaluate the compliance of participants to the study protocol.
To our knowledge, this is the first study that has investigated the impact of two yogurts, a plain one and an one enriched with PAF inhibitors on gut microbiota and faecal metabolites in healthy overweight subjects and report significant associations between gut microbiota and PAF metabolism and action.
Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
SA designed the research study, supervised its implementation and drafted the manuscript; EKM performed the evaluation of stool characteristics, gut microbiota qPCR-based analysis and SCFAs, performed the statistical analyses and critically revised the manuscript; AK designed and supervised the gut microbiota analysis and SCFAs and critically revised the manuscript; EF supervised the biochemical analyses, performed the statistical analyses and critically revised the manuscript; MD performed the biochemical analyses. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
All participants were informed about the objectives and procedures of the study and provided their written consent before enrollment. The study took place at the Department of Nutrition and Dietetics of Harokopio University in Athens, Greece, from October 2014 to June 2016. The trial adhered to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (1989) of the World Medical Association, was approved by the Bioethics Committee of Harokopio University (40/30-10-2013) and was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02259205).
The authors would like to thank the participants of this study for their involvement, as well as all the personnel and investigators for their contribution in the enrollment, randomization and dietary evaluation of the participants and in conducting the biochemical analysis of blood samples: Christos Kokkalis, M.D., Mary Yannakoulia, Costas Anastasiou, George Milias, Tzortzis Nomikos, Antigoni Tsiafitsa, Margarita Christea, Ioanna Vlachogianni, Marianna Xanthopoulou, Chrysa Argyrou and Stella Zouloumi.
The European Regional Development Fund of the EU and the Greek Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs, Sport and Culture/GGET – ЕΥDЕ-ЕΤАΚ have cofinanced this work, through the Operational Program Competitiveness and Entrepreneurship (OPC II), NSRF 2007–2013, Action “SYNERGASIA 2011” Project: 11SYN_2_652, entitled “Cardioprotective properties of yogurt enriched with bioactive lipids from oil production by-products”.
Smaragdi Antonopoulou states that given her role as Guest Editor, she had no involvement in the peer-review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to Dr. Amedeo Amedei and Dr. Eugene Rosenberg. Smaragdi Antonopoulou has a relevant patent (Hellenic Industrial Property Organisation, 1008550—25/08/2015 issued). The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.