IMR Press / FBL / Volume 28 / Issue 8 / DOI: 10.31083/j.fbl2808165
Open Access Original Research
fbl-typing and Antimicrobial Resistance Analysis of Staphylococcus lugdunensis
Show Less
1 Department of Clinical Laboratory, First Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 100853 Beijing, China
2 Department of Microbiology Laboratory, Beijing Chaoyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 100021 Beijing, China
3 Department of Ophthalmology, First Medical Center, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 100853 Beijing, China
*Correspondence: jieliu82@126.com (Jie Liu); 2468li@sina.com (Zhaoyan Wang)
These authors contributed equally.
Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed) 2023, 28(8), 165; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2808165
Submitted: 2 January 2023 | Revised: 6 March 2023 | Accepted: 15 March 2023 | Published: 11 August 2023
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: A broad variety of infections, ranging from skin infections to infective endocarditis can be caused by Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Bacterial virulence is often related to virulence genes, so we sought to investigate the relationship between virulence genes and the pathogenicity of S. lugdunensis and to explore an appropriate typing method to distinguish different pathogenic phenotypes of S. lugdunensis. Methods: We describe the distribution of several virulence genes in different infection types in an attempt to find the relationship between virulence genes and pathogenicity. Subsequently, we make the Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) dendrogram and fbl-typing were performed using BioNumerics software, tried to compare the correlation between different methods and the different infectious diseases, and antimicrobial resistance of the strains, in order to obtain the epidemic characteristics and antimicrobial resistance information of S. lugdunensis based on a molecular approach. Results: The results of virulence genes showed that the seven virulence genes we have described existed in most strains, and there was no significant correlation between virulence gene distribution and infection type. Compared with the MALDI-TOF MS dendrogram, we found that fbl-typing could better correspond to the pathogenic phenotype, with better recognition and reproducibility. In the phylogenetic tree constructed in the fbl R-region, we found a tendency for some infection types to be distributed in clusters, new type 3 was the most dominant fbl-type, followed by fbl47b. Bone and joint infection isolates and ear infection isolates were significantly clustered together, in addition, all the oxacillin-resistant isolates were concentrated in fbl-type fbl45j and fbl47b. Conclusions: In this study, we found no significant correlation between virulence genes from S. lugdunensis isolates and the site of infection. The fbl-typing has the characteristics of convenient operation, low cost, high repeatability, and is preferable to indicate the pathogenic phenotype. Based on fbl-typing, we described the epidemiological characteristics of S. lugdunensis in a hospital and supplemented the data for fbl-typing. We recommend that fbl-typing method be extended and supplemented.

Keywords
Staphylococcus lugdunensis
fbl-typing
virulence genes
antimicrobial resistance
1. Introduction

Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) are low-virulence commensal bacteria in human. However, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, as a distinctive CoNS, virulence is similar to that of Staphylococcus aureus and stronger than other CoNS species [1]. As an opportunistic pathogen, S. lugdunensis colonizes skin surfaces with high humidity such as the groin, perineum, breast, and armpit in 30%-50% of patients [2]. The clinical infection characteristics are likely to that of S.aureus, including infective endocarditis, bacteremia, meningitis, and bone and joint infections [3, 4]. However, the incidence and outcome of S. lugdunensis are largely unknown, with only a few small case studies [5]. S. lugdunensis was first reported by Freney et al. [6] in 1988, which did not attract clinical attention at the beginning. However, with the increasing number of reported cases of S. lugdunensis infection, people gradually realized that S. lugdunensis was an important cause of serious infection [7]. In the systematic review by Non et al. [8], S. lugdunensis is associated with a similar proportion of infective endocarditis as S. aureus. A study by Shah et al. [9] showed that bone and joint infections due to S. lugdunensis tend to be more invasive than other CoNS species and are more similar to those due to S. aureus. The high pathogenicity of S. lugdunensis is closely related to some virulence factors, such as the fibrinogen binding protein (FBL), VWF-binding protein (vWbl) and autolysis (AtlL). Some studies suggest that the virulence factors of S. lugdunensis may be related to infectious diseases [10, 11]. Therefore, we attempted to describe the relationship between the virulence genes of S. lugdunensis and different infectious diseases, so as to explore the relationship between virulence genes and pathogenic phenotypes, more to describe the epidemiological characteristics of S. lugdunensis in this hospital using an appropriate molecular biological method.

In addition, the early pathogens typing is decisive to initiate appropriate infection control measures for different pathogenic phenotypes [12]. We searched for suitable typing methods to distinguish different pathogenic phenotypes of S. lugdunensis, to take effective infection control. At present, the most widely used methods for typing S. lugdunensis are pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) [11, 13, 14]. However, these molecular typing methods have the disadvantages of being time-consuming and high cost. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is an emerging technology that has been increasingly used in clinical laboratories for rapid bacterial identification. Moreover, it has also shown the potential for typing applications among Staphylococcus species [15]. Therefore, we attempted to create a MALDI-TOF MS dendrogram to observe whether strains from different infection sites presented cluster distribution. Besides, fbl-typing is a special typing method for S. lugdunensis. The protein FBL of S. lugdunensis is encoded by fbl gene and belongs to the Sdr family, which has about 60% homology with clumping factor A (ClfA) of S. aureus [16, 17]. The fbl gene has three regions, namely N1, N2, N3, and a repeat region (R-region). More and more studies have confirmed that the fbl gene may be specific in S. lugdunensis, and its sequence is relatively conservative. Therefore, the fbl gene has been considered as a specific target of S. lugdunensis [18, 19]. Meanwhile, Dahyot et al. [14] proposed that the R-region be used as a genotyping method, which is similar to the S. aureus spa molecular typing method. The fbl-typing was based on the presence of gene polymorphism in a variable number of the 18 bp repeat sequences in the R-region of the fbl gene. Moreover, they confirmed that the fbl-typing was highly consistent with the results of MLST typing and had good identification ability [14].

Therefore, this study first described the relationship between the virulence genes of S. lugdunensis and different infectious diseases, so as to explore the relationship between virulence genes and pathogenic phenotypes. Subsequently, the MALDI-TOF MS dendrogram and fbl-typing were performed using BioNumerics software. We tried to compare the correlation between different methods and the different infectious diseases, antimicrobial resistance of the strains, in order to obtain the epidemic characteristics and antimicrobial resistance information of S. lugdunensis.

2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Bacterial Isolates

A total of 65 S. lugdunensis were collected from the department of clinical laboratory of the First Medical Center, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China. All isolates were identified by VITEK MS automatic rapid microbial mass spectrometry detection system (BioMérieux, Lyon, France), and the quality profiles were obtained in strict accordance with the operation manual and analyzed by VITEK MS database. The standard strain was Escherichia coli ATCC 8739, 27 reference sequence of the fbl gene of S. lugdunensis was downloaded from the website of National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).

2.2 MALDI-TOF MS

For MALDI-TOF MS analyses, isolates were incubated on Columbia blood agar (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for 24 h at 37 °C prior to mass spectral analyses. Single colonies of isolates grown on Columbia agar at 37 °C for 24 h were selected, transferred to target plates, and overlaid with α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) matrix solution. Colony samples were measured on a VITEK MS RUO system (BioMérieux, Lyon, France), using standard settings for routine identification in a mass range of 2000–20,000 Da. The system was calibrated with a fresh sample of E. coli ATCC 8739 that also served as a positive control in a second acquisition. As a negative control, matrix-only spots were regularly analyzed. MALDI scores 2 were assumed as positive.

2.3 DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

Isolates cultured overnight on the blood plate were placed in sterilized water and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was taken and heated at 100 °C for 10 min in a metal thermostat. After centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was taken and stored at –20 °C for later use. PCRs were performed on a Thermal Cycler in a final volume of 25 µL containing 12.5 µL 2×Taq PCR Master Mix, 0.5 µM of each primer (Table 1, Ref. [11, 14, 20, 21, 22]) and 1 µL of DNA. The PCR conditions were as follows: denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of amplification including denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 40 s. A final extension step at 72 °C for 5 min was performed.

Table 1.Primers used for the amplification and sequence gene identification.
Name Primer sequence (5-3) References
atlLR3 F: GCGTACATTAGCTGTTAAAACAA [11]
R: CGTCATAGAAATAGCTATCC
fbl-R F: TGGCATGGGATAATGAAGTAG [14]
R: CCACTCCCGTATAGTAACT
slush F: TTTCGTCTTTGCACACACATTTCCA [20]
R: ACAGCACAAAGCCTTAACTATCTCA
Beta-hemolysin F: TGGTCAAGGTACAGAAGGTTGGCA
R: TATCCCAACTATACGCGTTGCCCT
Hemolysin III F: TAATGCTGTTTCGCACGGAGTTGC
R: GACGCCTACCCATCCCATTACAA
vwbl F: TATATACCATGGCAACAATTCCAGATCGCG [21]
R: TTTATACCCGGGTTCTGACTGGATACGTTCATAC
icaA F: CGATGGGCTCAAGGTGG [22]
R: TTCTTTTCGTAGCGACTGTC
2.4 Antimicrobial Resistance Testing

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of S. lugdunensis was detected by the commercialized broth microdilution method (Xingbai Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). The results of sensitivity (S), moderate sensitivity (I) and drug resistance (R) were obtained according to the corresponding standards of the American Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [23]. Antibiotics include oxacillin (OXC), erythromycin (ERY), clindamycin (CLI), levofloxacin (LEV), tetracycline (TET), gentamicin (GEN), vancomycin (VAN), teicoplanin (TEC), rifampin (RIF), Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), daptomycin (DAP), Penicillin (PEN), linezolid (LZD), cefoxitin (CFX), nitrofurantoin (NIT). Multidrug resistance is resistance to at least one antimicrobial drug in three or more antimicrobial categories. The control strains were Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 and S. aureus ATCC 29213. S. aureus was used as a reference for oxacillin and cefoxitin, and Staphylococcus epidermidis was used as a reference for other antibiotics.

2.5 Sequence Alignment and Homology Analysis

DNA sequences were compared using BLAST program on NCBI website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). MEGA software (Version 6.0, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA) was used for homology analysis, the neighbor-joining method was used for phylogenetic tree construction, and the Bootstraping test was used for reliability analysis. The resulting spectra were downloaded into the BioNumerics software (Version7.6, BioMérieux, Lyon, France) and a dendrogram was constructed using a ranked Pearson correlation as a similarity coefficient. The fbl R-regions were analyzed using the plug-in “polymorphic VNTR typing” in Bionumerics software. A typing method of genetic polymorphism is provided by tandemly repeated sequences, known as the variable number of tandem repeats (VNTRs), whose number of repetitions varies at different rates depending on the different loci and even alleles. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (Version 16.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results
3.1 Type of Infection Caused by S. lugdunensis

The 65 isolates were isolated from the following infection types: bone and joint infection (n = 19), reproductive system infection (n = 14), skin and soft tissue infection (n = 12), urinary system infection (n = 7), ear infection (n = 5), cardiovascular system infection (n = 5), central nervous system infection (n = 2), respiratory system infection (n = 1).

3.2 Virulence Genes Carried in S. lugdunensis

There was no significant difference in the detection rate of virulence genes in S. lugdunensis from different infection sites (p > 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2.Characteristics of virulence gene of S. lugdunensis isolates in relation to infection sites.
vwbl icaA slush hemolysin III beta-hemolysin atlLR3 fbl-R
Bone and joint infection, n = 19 (%) 17/19 14/19 19/19 18/19 17/19 19 /19 19/19
Reproductive system infection, n = 14 (%) 13/14 13/14 14/14 14/14 13/14 14/14 14/14
Skin and soft tissue infection, n = 12 (%) 10/12 9/12 11/12 12/12 12/12 12/12 12/12
Urinary system infection, n = 7 (%) 6/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7
Ear infection, n = 5 (%) 4/5 4/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5
Cardiovascular system infection, n = 5 (%) 5/5 4/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5 5/5
Central nervous system infection, n = 2 (%) 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2
Respiratory system infection, n = 1 (%) 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1
Total, n = 65 58/65 54/65 64/65 64/65 62/65 65/65 65/65
3.3 Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance of S. lugdunensis
3.3.1 Antimicrobial Resistance Results of S. lugdunensis

Isolates in our study were resistant to PEN (85.7%), and were 100% sensitive to LEV, TET, GEN, VAN, RIF, SXT, DAP, LZD and NIT. Oxacillin-resistant S. lugdunensis was 11.1% (7/63). The positive rate of CLI induction test was 6.3% (4/63), and the multi-resistant rate (MDR) was 25.4% (16/63). Strains from ear infections had higher rates of drug resistance and multidrug resistance, followed by bone and joint infections. Characteristics of antibiotic resistance of S. ludunensis in different infection sites are shown in Table 3.

Table 3.Characteristics of antibiotic resistance of S. lugdunensis isolates in relation to infection sites.
Bone and joint infection, n = 19 (%) Reproductive system infection, n = 14 (%) Skin and soft tissue infection, n = 11 (%) Urinary system infection, n = 7 (%) Ear infection, n = 5 (%) Cardiovascular system infection, n = 4 (%) Central nervous system infection, n = 2 (%) Respiratory system infection, n = 1 (%) Total, n = 63
OXC 0/19 1/14 1/11 2/7 3/5 0/4 0/2 0/1 7/63
ERY 9/19 0/14 2/11 1/7 3/5 1/4 0/2 0/1 16/63
CLI 9/19 0/14 2/11 1/7 3/5 1/4 0/2 0/1 16/63
TEC 0/19 0/14 1/11 0/7 0/5 0/4 0/2 0/1 1/63
PEN 19/19 8/14 10/11 7/7 4/5 3/4 2/2 1/1 54/63
MDR 9/19 0/14 2/11 1/7 3/5 1/4 0/2 0/1 16/63

OXC, oxacillin; ERY, erythromycin; CLI, clindamycin; TEC, teicoplanin; PEN, Penicillin; MDR, multi-resistant rate.

3.3.2 Antibiotic Resistance Rate of Oxacillin-Resistant S. lugdunensis Group and Oxacillin-Sensitive S. lugdunensis Group

S. lugdunensis was divided into the oxacillin-resistant group and the oxacillin-sensitive group. LEV, TET, GEN, VAN, RIF, SXT, DAP, LZD, and NIT were all sensitive. The antibiotic resistance rates of ERY, CLI, PEN, and MDR in the oxacillin-resistant S. lugdunensis group were higher than those in the oxacillin-sensitive group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

3.4 MALDI-TOF MS Results

In the MALDI-TOF MS dendrogram, isolates were distributed mainly six major clusters (Fig. 1). According to the infection types and clusters, some phenotypic isolates had a tendency to a more homogeneous clustering, such as bone and joint infection and reproductive system infection, but most phenotypes showed a more random distribution across the tree, such as cardiovascular system infection, urinary system infection and ear infection, etc. In general, isolates from different infection sites were difficult to have a homogeneous cluster on the MALDI-TOF MS dendrogram.

Fig. 1.

MALDI-TOF MS dendrogram. Isolates were distributed mainly in six major clusters. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry, MALDI-TOF MS; CFX, cefoxitin.

3.5 fbl-typing Results

The fbl-typing was performed on 65 isolates and 27 reference strains by using VNTR method (Fig. 2). A total of 35 genotypes including 3 new repeat sequences (Supplementary Table 1) and 18 new genotypes (Supplementary Table 2) were identified. The phylogenetic tree of 92 S. lugdunensis was constructed in the fbl R-region. The phylogenetic tree could be divided into four major evolutionary branches. In this study, new type 3 was the most dominant fbl-type, followed by fbl47b.

Fig. 2.

The phylogenetic tree of 92 S. lugdunensis was constructed by using VNTR method. The phylogenetic tree could be divided into four major evolutionary branches. VNTR, variable number of tandem repeats.

Bone and joint infections distributed in clusters in branches Ⅲ, mainly classified as fbl-type fbl43c and in several newly discovered types, such as new type 2, new type 3, new type 4, and new type 5. The distribution of bone and joint infection was significantly different between new type 3 and non-new type 3 (p < 0.05). In addition, the four strains isolated from ear infection were all distributed in branch Ⅰ. In branch Ⅳ, there was a cluster of strains fbl-type fbl47b, in which LD42, reference strains SL55 and FDAARGO_S222 were isolated from skin and soft tissue infection, except reference strain NCTC12217, whose infection site was not found. As the isolates in this study are sensitive to most antibiotics, it has not been observed that the antibiotic resistance of isolates in the evolutionary tree presents a cluster distribution. However, compared with other branches, the MDR in branch Ⅰ is higher than in other branches, and most of them are oxacillin-resistant isolates. It is noteworthy that all the oxacillin-resistant isolates were concentrated in fbl-type fbl45j and fbl47b.

4. Discussion

S. lugdunensis is a skin-colonizing bacterium, once the body is damaged, it is more likely to cause skin and soft tissue infection. However, in this hospital, the bone and joint infection type was the common type (25.4%, 19/65), which may be caused by the increase in artificial joint replacement. It is worth noting that reproductive system infection also accounted for a large proportion (21.5%, 14/65), most of which were isolated from semen, cervical or vaginal secretions, suggesting that reproductive system infection was also an important type of infection caused by S. lugdunensis in this hospital. The results of virulence genes showed that the seven virulence genes mentioned above existed in most strains, and there was no significant correlation between virulence gene distribution and infection type. The atlL gene encodes the major autolysin of S. lugdunensis, which plays a key role in cell division, biofilm formation, adhesion, and invasion [24, 25, 26]. Some studies have proposed that vWf-binding protein (vWbl) encoded by the vwbl gene can directly bind to von Willebrand factor (vWf), which is the key to resisting shear force and cause endocarditis, but other studies have pointed out that vWbl may not be the ligand of vWf [21, 27]. The vwbl gene is widely present in various infection types, and whether it plays a key role in causing infective endocarditis still needs to be studied which are similar to Giormezis et al. [28]. The genes encoding beta-hemolysin and hemolysin III of S. lugdunensis were widely present in isolates. In addition, three open reading frames, slush-A, slush-B and slush-C, exist outside the AGR genetic locus, encoding S. lugdunensis synergistic haemolysin (SLUSH). Rautenberg et al. [29] proposed that SLUSH was a phenol-soluble modulins like peptide (PSM-like peptide), which acted similarly to S. aureus PSM and can bind to formylpeptide receptor 2 (FPR2) of human leukocytes, which may be associated with its ability to cause invasive infections. The detection rate of slush gene was significantly different. Giormezis et al. [28] proposed that the vwbl and slush were more common in isolates of deep infection, but Szabados et al. [20] reported that the detection rate of the slush gene was low in all infection types, and there was no difference in distribution among all infection types. In this study, the detection rate of slush was high, showing no difference in distribution among different infection types. Therefore, the distribution of each virulence gene and its pathogenesis still need to be further studied. Due to the lack of research, it is not clear whether the distribution of virulence genes varies across regions and infection types.

Although the antibiotic resistance of CoNS is serious at present, S. lugdunensis in this study is sensitive to most antibiotics in the clinic. There were significant differences in penicillin resistance rates among different reports, and penicillin resistance was serious in this study [30]. The oxacillin-resistant rate of S. lugdunensis was 11.1%, and the MDR was 25.4%, which should be paid more attention to clinically. Comparing the antibiotic resistance rates of S. lugdunensis isolates from different infection sites, it was found that the antibiotic resistance rates of bone and joint infections and ear infections isolates were generally higher than those of other infection isolates. Three isolates of four ear infections S. lugdunensis (antibiotic resistance spectrum: OXC-ERY-CLI---------PEN----CFX--) were oxacillin-resistant isolates, which was higher than the oxacillin-resistance rate for non-ear infections (7.1%, 4/56), and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). These results suggest that the majority of ear infections caused by S. lugdunensis are multiple resistance isolates, and the antibiotic should be guided by the results of the antibiotic sensitivity test before the empirical use of antibiotics. After the isolates were divided into the oxacillin-resistant group and oxacillin-sensitive group, the antibiotic resistance rates of ERY, CLI and PEN in the oxacillin-resistant group were higher than those in the oxacillin-sensitive group, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Therefore, although all isolates in this study were sensitive to most antibiotics, the antibiotic resistant isolates of oxacillin still need to be concerned.

In order to explore an appropriate typing method to distinguish different pathogenic phenotypes of S. lugdunensis, we created a MALDI-TOF MS dendrogram and performed fbl-typing by BioNumerics software. Compared with the two methods, we found that the isolates from different infection sites were difficulty having the tendency of cluster distribution on the MALDI-TOF MS dendrogram, and the recognition and reproducibility were poor. With some reports, MALDI -TOF MS excepts for identification has also been explored for typing of diverse microorganisms (MALDI-typing) [31, 32]. But due to the high overall similarity of MS fingerprints within species and the difficulty of reproducibly detecting sufficient numbers of biomarkers below species-level specificity. It was proposed by researchers that MALDI-TOF MS should be established and performed as a robust typing tool under standard culture conditions, i.e., using a single medium type, incubation time and sample preparation procedure [15, 33]. In this study, 65 strains of S. lugdunensis were classified by fbl-typing, among which 30 strains were of novel type and New type3 was the dominant type. The comparison between the two dendrograms showed that the clustering trend of isolates from different infection sites in the two dendrograms had low similarity. The fbl-typing of 240 S. lugdunensis by Dahyot et al. [14], the dominant type was fbl47b. The new type 3 collected in our study was the dominant type, followed by fbl47b, indicating that the epidemic types of S. lugdunensis were different in different regions, and it was necessary to continuously monitor it. Phylogenetic tree construction showed that isolates from different infection types had a cluster distribution trend, suggesting that fbl-typing could indicate the pathogenicity of S. lugdunensis in this hospital.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the virulence genes of S. lugdunensis in our study were not significantly correlated with the infection sites. And the isolates were sensitive to most antibiotics, but attention should be paid to the oxacillin-resistance isolates. Compared with the MALDI-TOF MS dendrogram, fbl-typing could better correspond to the pathogenic phenotype. fbl-typing is a method of molecular typing based on the polymorphism of fbl gene repeats, which has the advantages of convenient operation, low cost, and reproducide, it is worth promoting and supplementing. Based on fbl-typing, the antibiotics resistance and infection sites of 65 S. lugdunensis were analyzed, it was found that the antibiotics resistance spectrum and infection sites of isolates had a certain distribution pattern in the phylogenetic tree. Our study provided basic data for the epidemic characteristics of S. lugdunensis in this hospital and supplementary data for fbl-typing. We concluded that fbl-typing is a excellent method for rapid genotyping of S. lugdunensis and can be used as an important tool in molecular epidemiological investigation, have been developed to analyze the genetic characteristics and phylogeny of S. lugdunensis from different sources.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author Contributions

GC—Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation. YH—Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing- Original draft preparation. LY—Methodology, Data curation. QZ—Software, Validation. JL—Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - Reviewing and Editing. ZW—Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - Reviewing and Editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
Argemi X, Riegel P, Lavigne T, Lefebvre N, Grandpré N, Hansmann Y, et al. Implementation of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry in routine clinical laboratories improves identification of coagulase-negative Staphylococci and reveals the pathogenic role of Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2015; 5: 2030–2036.
[2]
Van der Mee-Marquet N, Achard A, Mereghetti L, Danton A, Minier M, Quentin R. Staphylococcus lugdunensis infections: high frequency of inguinal area carriage. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2003; 41: 1404–1409.
[3]
Lozano-Masdemont B, Gómez-Recuero-Muñoz L, Pulido-Pérez A. Staphylococcus lugdunensis: An emerging pathogen in skin and soft tissue infections. Actas Dermo-Sifiliograficas. 2015; 106: 769–770.
[4]
Chou DW, Lee CT. Primary lung abscess caused by Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy. 2017; 23: 791–793.
[5]
Parthasarathy S, Shah S, Raja Sager A, Rangan A, Durugu S. Staphylococcus lugdunensis: Review of epidemiology, complications, and treatment. Cureus. 2020; 12: e8801.
[6]
Freney J, Brun Y, Bes M, Meugnier H, Grimont F, Grimont PAD, Nervi C, Fleurette J. Staphylococcus lugdunensis sp. nov. and Staphylococcus schleiferi sp. nov., two species from human clinical specimens. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 1988; 38: 168–172.
[7]
Kyaw H, Raju F, Shaikh AZ, Lin AN, Lin AT, Abboud J, et al. Staphylococcus lugdunensis endocarditis and cerebrovascular accident: A systemic review of risk factors and clinical outcome. Cureus. 2018; 10: e2469.
[8]
Non LR, Santos CA. The occurrence of infective endocarditis with Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia: A retrospective cohort study and systematic review. Journal of Infection. 2017; 74: 179–186.
[9]
Shah NB, Osmon DR, Fadel H, Patel R, Kohner PC, Steckelberg JM, et al. Laboratory and clinical characteristics of Staphylococcus lugdunensis prosthetic joint infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2010, 48: 1600–1603.
[10]
Nilsson M, Bjerketorp J, Guss B, Frykberg L. A fibrinogen-binding protein of Staphylococcus lugdunensis. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2004; 241: 87–93.
[11]
Didi J, Lemée L, Gibert L, Pons JL, Pestel-Caron M. Multi-virulence-locus sequence typing of Staphylococcus lugdunensis generates results consistent with a clonal population structure and is reliable for epidemiological typing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2014; 52: 3624–3632.
[12]
Noguchi N, Fukuzawa M, Wajima T, Yokose K, Suzuki M, Nakaminami H, et al. Specific clones of Staphylococcus lugdunensis may be associated with colon carcinoma. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2018; 11: 39–42.
[13]
Yeh CF, Liu TP, Cheng CW, Chang SC, Lee MH, Lu JJ. Molecular characteristics of disease-causing and commensal Staphylococcus lugdunensis isolates from 2003 to 2013 at a tertiary hospital in Taiwan. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10: e0134859.
[14]
Dahyot S, Lebeurre J, Laumay F, Argemi X, Dubos C, Lemée L, et al. Fbl-typing of Staphylococcus lugdunensis: A frontline tool for epidemiological studies, but not predictive of fibrinogen binding ability. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019; 10: 1109.
[15]
Steensels D, Deplano A, Denis O, Simon A, Verroken A. MALDI-TOF MS typing of a nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus outbreak in a neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Clinica Belgica. 2017; 72: 219–225.
[16]
Mitchell J, Tristan A, Foster TJ. Characterization of the fibrinogen-binding surface protein Fbl of Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Microbiology. 2004; 150: 3831–3841.
[17]
Marlinghaus L, Becker K, Korte M, Neumann S, Gatermann SG, Szabados F. Construction and characterization of three knockout mutants of the fbl gene in Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica, et Immunologica Scandinavica. 2012; 120: 108–116.
[18]
Chatzigeorgiou KS, Siafaka N, Petinaki E, Zerva L. fbl gene as a species-specific target for Staphylococcus lugdunensis identification. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis. 2010; 24: 119–122.
[19]
Pereira EM, Oliveira FL, Schuenck RP, Zoletti GO, Dos Santos KR. Detection of Staphylococcus lugdunensis by a new species-specific PCR based on the fbl gene. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. 2010; 58: 295–298.
[20]
Szabados F, Nowotny Y, Marlinghaus L, Korte M, Neumann S, Kaase M, et al. Occurrence of genes of putative fibrinogen binding proteins and hemolysins, as well as of their phenotypic correlates in isolates of S. lugdunensis of different origins. BMC Research Notes. 2011; 4: 113.
[21]
Nilsson M, Bjerketorp J, Wiebensjö A, Ljungh A, Frykberg L, Guss B. A von Willebrand factor-binding protein from Staphylococcus lugdunensis. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2004; 234: 155–161.
[22]
Potter A, Ceotto H, Giambiagi-Demarval M, dos Santos KR, Nes IF, Bastos Mdo C. The gene bap, involved in biofilm production, is present in Staphylococcus spp. strains from nosocomial infections. Journal of Microbiology. 2009; 47: 319–326.
[23]
CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, M100 31st Edition. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA. 2021.
[24]
Gibert L, Didi J, Marlinghaus L, Lesouhaitier O, Legris S, Szabados F, et al. The major autolysin of Staphylococcus lugdunensis, AtlL, is involved in cell separation, stress-induced autolysis and contributes to bacterial pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2014; 352: 78–86.
[25]
Hussain M, Steinbacher T, Peters G, Heilmann C, Becker K. The adhesive properties of the Staphylococcus lugdunensis multifunctional autolysin AtlL and its role in biofilm formation and internalization. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2015; 305: 129–139.
[26]
Al Majid FM. Staphylococcus lugdunensis from gluteal abscess to destructive native triple valve endocarditis. Saudi Medical Journal. 2018; 39: 1050–1053.
[27]
Liesenborghs L, Peetermans M, Claes J, Veloso TR, Vandenbriele C, Criel M, et al. Shear-resistant binding to von willebrand factor allows Staphylococcus lugdunensis to adhere to the cardiac valves and initiate dndocarditis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2016; 213: 1148–1156.
[28]
Giormezis N, Kolonitsiou F, Makri A, Vogiatzi A, Christofidou M, Anastassiou ED, et al. Virulence factors among Staphylococcus lugdunensis are associated with infection sites and clonal spread. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2015; 34: 773–778.
[29]
Rautenberg M, Joo HS, Otto M, Peschel A. Neutrophil responses to Staphylococcal pathogens and commensals via the formyl peptide receptor 2 relates to phenol-soluble modulin release and virulence. FASEB Journal. 2011; 25: 1254–1263.
[30]
Taha L, Stegger M, Söderquist B. Staphylococcus lugdunensis: antimicrobial susceptibility and optimal treatment options. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases: Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology. 2019; 38: 1449–1455.
[31]
Veenemans J, Welker M, van Belkum A, Saccomani MC, Girard V, Pettersson A, et al. Comparison of MALDI-TOF MS and AFLP for strain typing of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2016; 35: 829–838.
[32]
Lafolie J, Sauget M, Cabrolier N, Hocquet D, Bertrand X. Detection of Escherichia coli sequence type 131 by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry: implications for infection control policies? The Journal of Hospital Infection. 2015; 90: 208–212.
[33]
Pinto TC, Costa NS, Castro LF, Ribeiro RL, Botelho AC, Neves FP, et al. Potential of MALDI-TOF MS as an alternative approach for capsular typing Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7: 45572.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share
Back to top