IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 32 / Issue 3 / pii/2005044

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology (CEOG) is published by IMR Press from Volume 47 Issue 1 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with S.O.G.

Original Research

Matched control study of efficacy of lymphocyte immunotherapy in donor oocyte recipients to support or refute the concept of need for histocompatibility antigen sharing of the couple for benefits

Show Less
1 Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Camden, NJ (USA)
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 32(3), 155–157;
Published: 10 September 2005
Abstract

Purpose: To determine if lymphocyte immunotherapy (LIT) improves outcome in recalcitrant donor oocyte recipients lf LIT was found to be similarly effective in this group, the theory of shared maternal paternal histocompatibility antigens would seem less plausible because the donor oocyte introduces another group of histocompatibility antigens. Methods: Donor oocyte recipients with a history of failure to conceive despite at least two previous ETs using donor oocytes were given the option of having LIT. They were matched with the very next recipient who declined LIT therapy. Lymphocyte immunother-apy using the male partner's lymphocytes was given two weeks before transfer and twice more if pregnant. Results: Only three controls delivered versus recipients treated with LIT. Conclusions: The fact that benefit from LIT extended to oocyte recipients challenges the concept that lymphocyte immunotherapy is most beneficial for couples sharing histocompatibility antigens.

Keywords
Donor oocytes
Recipients
Immunotherapy
Lymphocytes
Share
Back to top