-
- Academic Editors
-
-
-
Background: Owing to advances in procedural techniques and the training
of interventional staff in catheterization labs, recent work has demonstrated the
safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a treatment for patients
suffering from chronic total occlusion (CTO). However, there has been little
research focused on systematic comparisons of PCI outcomes in CTO patients that
did or did not exhibit a history of previous coronary artery bypass grafting
(CABG). Methods: Electronic databases were systematically searched for
all studies comparing CTO-PCI outcomes for patients with and without a history of
CABG, with event rates subsequently being compared via random-effects models with
forest plots and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI), owing to the
assumption of between-studies heterogeneity. Results: In total, 8
observational studies enrolling 13,509 CTO patients were identified, including
3389 and 10,120 patients with and without a history of prior CABG, respectively.
Patients were enrolled in these studies from 1999–2018. Pooled analyses
indicated that CABG history was not linked to a lower proportion of radial access
24 (95% CI 0.52–1.03, p = 0.08), and a prior CABG history was linked
to a greater contrast volume (95% CI 0.12–0.44, p
