† These authors contributed equally.
Academic Editor: Peter A. McCullough
Limited data suggests possible gender-specific association between serum uric
acid (SUA) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence. The aim of the present
analysis was to evaluate the association between SUA levels and 10-year CVD
incidence (2002–2012) in the ATTICA study
participants. Overall, 1687 apparently healthy volunteers, with SUA
measurements, residing in the greater metropolitan Athens area (Greece), were
included. Multivariable Cox-regression models were used to estimate the hazard
ratios for SUA in relation to 10-year CVD incidence. Receiver operating curve
analysis was conducted to detect optimal SUA cut-off values. Participants in the
2nd and 3rd SUA tertile had 29 and 73% higher 10-year CVD incidence compared
with those in the 1st tertile (p
Serum uric acid (SUA), the final oxidation product of purine metabolism, has been traditionally associated with gout arthritis/arthropathy and nephrolithiasis [1]. During the last decades, there is accumulating evidence linking increased SUA levels with cardiovascular disease (CVD) [2, 3, 4], chronic kidney disease [5, 6, 7] and several metabolic disorders, such as diabetes and its complications [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13], metabolic syndrome (MetS) [14, 15] and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [16, 17, 18]. Furthermore, hyperuricemia has been related to increased total and CVD mortality [19, 20, 21, 22]. Apart from these diseases, SUA levels are influenced by gender [23], age [24] and drug therapy (e.g., antihypertensive, antidiabetic and hypolipidemic) [25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. It should be noted that the latest (2018) guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Society of Hypertension (ESH) included SUA among CVD risk factors that should be evaluated to stratify individual’s risk [31, 32]. There has been some discussion regarding the possible effect of gender on the association between SUA and CVD risk, the latter being stronger in women [33, 34, 35, 36]. However, available data is limited.
SUA cut-off levels that define hyperuricemia [i.e.,
Obese patients in the absence of metabolic disorders are characterized as metabolically healthy obese (MHO) [41]. Although a unified definition of MHO is lacking, the features of the MetS (i.e., abnormal glucose, blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein and triglycerides) are the most frequent used criteria [42]. MHO individuals may be at an increased risk for CVD [43, 44, 45]. There are only a few studies reporting that elevated SUA levels may affect CVD risk in MHO individuals [46, 47].
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between SUA levels and 10-year CVD incidence in the ATTICA cohort study, as well as the potential synergistic effects of gender and metabolic health status on this association. SUA cut-off values predicting CVD incidence were also identified.
The ATTICA study is a prospective, observational cohort investigation which was initiated in 2001 and had two follow-up examinations, on 2006 and 2012 [48].
Apparently healthy individuals, aged 18 and over, randomly and stratified selected from the greater metropolitan Athens area, Greece, were participated. All participants were free of CVD and other chronic diseases, according to study protocol [48].
At baseline examination (2001–2002), n = 3042 men and women agreed to
participate. Of the enrolled participants, n = 1514 (49.8%) were men (mean age:
46
For the present analysis, another n = 333 participants with missing SUA
measurements at baseline, were excluded. Thus, the working sample consists of n =
1687 individuals; n = 825 men (mean age: 46
The ATTICA study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of Athens Medical School (#017/1.5.2001). The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1989) of the World Medical Association. All participants were informed about the study aims and procedures and provided written informed consent.
Biochemical evaluation was carried out in the biochemistry laboratory of the
First Cardiology Clinic of University of Athens School of Medicine, following the
criteria of the World Health Organization Reference Laboratories [49, 50]. SUA
was measured only at baseline in mg/dL (1 mg/dL = 59.48
Age, gender, education, adherence to the Mediterranean diet [52, 53], physical
activity [54], smoking, body mass index (BMI) and metabolic health status were
recorded. In details, BMI was calculated as weight (in kg) divided by height (in
m squared). Normal weight was defined as BMI between 18.5 and 25 kg/m
Categorical variables are presented as absolute (n) and relative frequencies
(%). Continuous variables are presented as mean
The 10-year CVD incidence was 14.9% (n = 253) [19.0% (n = 157) in men and
11.1% (n = 96) in women, p
Baseline characteristics | Gender-specific SUA tertiles | ||||
Men | 1st tertile | 2nd tertile | 3rd tertile | p-value | |
n | 248 | 286 | 291 | ||
SUA, mg/dL | 3.71 (0.55) | 4.81 (0.27) | 6.35 (0.89) | ||
Age, years | 44 (13) | 42 (11) | 46 (13) | ||
Body mass index, kg/m |
26.5 (3.6) | 26.8 (3.2) | 28.5 (4.4) | ||
Waist circumference, cm | 94 (12) | 97 (12) | 100 (12) | ||
Obesity, % | 16 | 14 | 29 | ||
Physical activity, % | 49 | 39 | 40 | 0.37 | |
Metabolically unhealthy status, % | 36 | 47 | 66 | ||
Current smoking, % | 46 | 50 | 44 | 0.21 | |
History of hypertension, % | 37 | 32 | 42 | 0.02 | |
Antihypertensive treatment, % | 20 | 27 | 25 | 0.12 | |
History of diabetes mellitus, % | 8 | 5 | 9 | 0.05 | |
Antidiabetic treatment, % | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0.27 | |
HOMA-IR | 3.57 (2.63) | 3.27 (1.85) | 3.53 (2.31) | 0.13 | |
History of hypercholesterolemia, % | 33 | 41 | 45 | ||
Hypolipidemic treatment, % | 20 | 31 | 32 | ||
LDL-C, mg/dL | 108 (33) | 117 (35) | 129 (36) | ||
CRP, mg/L | 1.58 (1.97) | 1.90 (2.24) | 2.38 (2.48) | ||
Alanine transaminase, U/L | 22 (10) | 21 (8) | 29 (18) | 0.004 | |
Aspartate transaminase, U/L | 27 (13) | 26 (8) | 28 (13) | 0.53 | |
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m |
113 (24) | 113 (24) | 116 (29) | 0.16 | |
Family CVD history, % | 22 | 26 | 30 | 0.12 | |
Women | 1st tertile | 2nd tertile | 3rd tertile | p-value | |
n | 252 | 317 | 293 | ||
SUA, mg/dL | 2.46 (0.38) | 3.38 (0.24) | 4.48 (0.97) | ||
Age, years | 39 (12) | 42 (13) | 48 (18) | ||
Body mass index, kg/m |
23.1 (3.8) | 24.8 (4.5) | 27.3 (5.1) | ||
Waist circumference, cm | 76 (10) | 81 (13) | 89 (14) | ||
Obesity, % | 6 | 15 | 27 | ||
Physical activity, % | 41 | 37 | 41 | 0.01 | |
Metabolically unhealthy status, % | 57 | 57 | 77 | ||
Current smoking, % | 43 | 37 | 38 | 0.18 | |
History of hypertension, % | 15 | 19 | 33 | ||
Antihypertensive treatment, % | 9 | 8 | 19 | ||
History of diabetes mellitus, % | 2 | 4 | 9 | ||
Antidiabetic treatment, % | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0.07 | |
HOMA-IR | 2.52 (1.12) | 2.70 (1.86) | 2.87 (1.51) | 0.008 | |
History of hypercholesterolemia, % | 28 | 36 | 52 | ||
Hypolipidemic treatment, % | 17 | 18 | 27 | ||
LDL-C, mg/dL | 119 (35) | 121 (34) | 133 (40) | ||
C-Reactive Protein, mg/L | 1.19 (1.81) | 1.99 (2.59) | 2.68 (2.96) | ||
Alanine transaminase, U/L | 16 (6) | 18 (9) | 20 (13) | 0.001 | |
Aspartate transaminase, U/L | 23 (13) | 23 (9) | 25 (11) | 0.30 | |
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m |
99 (15) | 100 (23) | 104 (26) | 0.12 | |
Family CVD history, % | 35 | 27 | 26 | 0.05 | |
Data are presented as mean Abbreviations: SUA, serum uric acid; CVD, cardiovascular disease; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance. |
Results from unadjusted analysis regarding the association between SUA and CVD incidence rate within the 10-year follow-up, separately for men and women, are presented in Table 2. In particular, women in the highest SUA tertile had almost twice as high risk to develop a fatal/non-fatal CVD event within the decade compared with their counterparts in the lowest tertiles (157 vs. 79 CVD events/1000 participants, respectively; p = 0.008). A similar trend was observed for men (237 vs. 169 CVD events/1000 participants, respectively; p = 0.04). Ranking from the lowest to the highest SUA tertile, the man-to-woman CVD event rate ratio was 2.13, 1.69 and 1.50, respectively.
Statistical metrics | Overall sample | Gender-specific SUA tertiles | p-value | |||
1st tertile | 2nd tertile | 3rd tertile | ||||
Men, n/cases | 825/157 | 248/42 | 286/46 | 291/69 | 0.04 | |
CVD incidence rate per 100 participants | 19.0 | 16.9 | 16.1 | 23.7 | ||
Women, n/cases | 862/96 | 252/20 | 317/30 | 293/46 | 0.008 | |
CVD incidence rate per 100 participants | 11.1 | 7.9 | 9.5 | 15.7 | ||
Overall, n/cases | 1687/253 | 500/62 | 603/76 | 584/115 | ||
CVD incidence rate per 100 participants | 15.0 | 12.4 | 12.6 | 19.7 | ||
Man-to-woman CVD incidence rate ratio | 1.72 | 2.13 | 1.69 | 1.50 | ||
p-values were obtained using chi-squared test.
Abbreviations: CVD, cardiovascular disease; SUA, serum uric acid. |
Results from nested Cox regression models evaluating the association between SUA tertiles and CVD incidence in the total sample are presented in Table 3. In the unadjusted models, participants in the 2nd and 3rd SUA tertile had about 29% (HR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.19–1.40) and 73% (HR 1.73, 95% CI: 1.23–2.42) higher risk to develop CVD within the decade compared with their 1st tertile counterparts, respectively. In the age- and sex- adjusted model, the aforementioned associations were attenuated but retained the level of significance (Model 2). After adjusting for anthropometric, lifestyle, clinical and biochemical factors, the association between SUA and CVD incidence remained only for participants in the 3rd SUA tertile (Model 5). However, after adjusting for metabolic health status, the level of significance was lost (Model 6).
Variables included in the model | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | |
HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | ||
SUA tertiles | |||||||
1st | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | |
2nd | 1.29 (1.19, 1.40) | 1.16 (1.07, 1.26) | 1.12 (1.03, 1.21) | 1.09 (1.00, 1.18) | 1.05 (0.96, 1.15) | 1.02 (0.95, 1.07) | |
3rd | 1.73 (1.23, 2.42) | 1.55 (1.11, 2.18) | 1.51 (1.09, 2.11) | 1.47 (1.05, 2.08) | 1.42 (1.01, 1.99) | 1.39 (0.98, 1.95) | |
Age, per 1 year | - | 1.08 (1.07, 1.09) | 1.08 (1.06, 1.09) | 1.07 (1.05, 1.09) | 1.07 (1.05, 1.09) | 1.07 (1.05, 1.09) | |
Male gender | - | 1.86 (1.41, 2.46) | 1.82 (1.36, 2.45) | 1.81 (1.17, 2.76) | 1.66 (1.07, 2.61) | 1.66 (1.07, 2.61) | |
Years of school, per 1 year | - | - | 0.96 (0.92, 0.99) | 0.97 (0.92, 1.02) | 0.95 (0.90, 1.01) | 0.95 (0.90, 1.01) | |
MedDietScore (range 0–55), per 1/55 | - | - | 0.98 (0.96, 0.99) | 0.98 (0.94, 0.99) | 0.97 (0.94, 1.01) | 0.97 (0.94, 1.01) | |
Alcohol consumption, yes vs. no | - | - | 0.90 (0.75, 1.10) | 0.92 (0.76, 1.11) | 0.92 (0.76, 1.11) | 0.92 (0.76, 1.11) | |
Physical activity, yes vs. no | - | - | 0.94 (0.70, 1.25) | 1.32 (0.88, 1.98) | 1.43 (0.94, 2.17) | 1.43 (0.94, 2.17) | |
Current smoking, yes vs. no | - | - | 1.27 (0.94, 1.71) | 1.50 (1.00, 2.28) | 1.45 (0.94, 2.23) | 1.45 (0.94, 2.23) | |
LDL-C, per 1 mg/dL | - | - | - | 1.01 (1.00, 1.03) | 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) | 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) | |
Family history of CVD, yes vs. no | - | - | - | 1.37 (0.90, 2.08) | 1.39 (0.89, 2.17) | 1.39 (0.89, 2.17) | |
ALT, per 1 U/L | - | - | - | 1.01 (0.98, 1.04) | 1.00 (0.97, 1.04) | 1.00 (0.97, 1.04) | |
AST, per 1 U/L | - | - | - | 0.99 (0.95, 1.02) | 0.98 (0.94, 1.01) | 0.98 (0.94, 1.01) | |
Waist circumference, per 1 cm | - | - | - | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) | |
HOMA-IR, per 1 unit | - | - | - | 1.06 (0.98, 1.16) | 1.06 (0.98, 1.16) | 1.06 (0.98, 1.16) | |
CRP, per 1 mg/L | - | - | - | 1.06 (0.98, 1.15) | 1.06 (0.98, 1.15) | 1.06 (0.98, 1.15) | |
eGFR, per mL/min/1.73 m |
- | - | - | 0.99 (0.98, 1.01) | 0.99 (0.98, 1.01) | 0.99 (0.98, 1.01) | |
Obesity, yes vs. no | - | - | - | - | 1.65 (1.00, 2.92) | 1.61 (0.89, 2.52) | |
Metabolic health status, healthy vs. unhealthy | - | - | - | - | - | 0.43 (0.17, 0.99) | |
HRs and their corresponding 95% CIs were obtained from Cox regression analysis.
Bold indicates statistically significant outcomes, i.e., p Abbreviations: SUA, serum uric acid; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-Reactive Protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR, Hazard ratio; HOMA-IR, Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol. |
The associations between SUA and 10-year CVD event rate examined by nested Cox-regression analysis are presented in Table 4. After adjusting for anthropometric, lifestyle, biochemical and clinical factors, 1 mg/dL (0.06 mmol/L) rise in SUA levels resulted in about 10% higher 10-year CVD risk. The level of significance was lost when the analysis was adjusted for obesity and metabolic health status (Model 5 and 6).
Variables included in the model | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 |
HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |
SUA per 1 mg/dL | 1.27 (1.16, 1.39) | 1.14 (1.09, 1.25) | 1.12 (1.06, 1.21) | 1.10 (1.04, 1.18) | 1.06 (0.99, 1.12) | 1.04 (0.97, 1.10) |
Age, per 1 year | - | 1.09 (1.06, 1.11) | 1.09 (1.07, 1.12) | 1.09 (1.07, 1.12) | 1.09 (1.07, 1.12) | 1.09 (1.07, 1.12) |
Male gender | - | 1.87 (1.40, 2.45) | 1.83 (1.35, 2.46) | 1.83 (1.35, 2.46) | 1.66 (1.07, 2.61) | 1.65 (1.08, 2.60) |
Years of school, per 1 year | - | - | 0.96 (0.92, 0.99) | 0.97 (0.92, 1.02) | 0.95 (0.90, 1.01) | 0.95 (0.90, 1.01) |
MedDietScore (range 0–55), per 1/55 | - | - | 0.98 (0.96, 0.99) | 0.98 (0.94, 0.99) | 0.97 (0.94, 1.01) | 0.97 (0.94, 1.01) |
Alcohol consumption, yes vs. no | - | - | 0.90 (0.75, 1.10) | 0.92 (0.76, 1.11) | 0.92 (0.76, 1.11) | 0.92 (0.76, 1.11) |
Physical activity, yes vs. no | - | - | 0.94 (0.70, 1.25) | 1.32 (0.88, 1.98) | 1.43 (0.94, 2.17) | 1.43 (0.94, 2.17) |
Current smoking, yes vs. no | - | - | 1.27 (0.94, 1.71) | 1.50 (1.00, 2.28) | 1.45 (0.94, 2.23) | 1.45 (0.94, 2.23) |
LDL-C, per 1 mg/dL | - | - | - | 1.01 (1.00, 1.03) | 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) | 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) |
Family history of CVD, yes vs. no | - | - | - | 1.37 (0.90, 2.08) | 1.39 (0.89, 2.17) | 1.39 (0.89, 2.17) |
ALT, per 1 U/L | - | - | - | 1.01 (0.98, 1.04) | 1.00 (0.97, 1.04) | 1.00 (0.97, 1.04) |
AST, per 1 U/L | - | - | - | 0.99 (0.95, 1.02) | 0.98 (0.94, 1.01) | 0.98 (0.94, 1.01) |
Waist circumference, per 1 cm | - | - | - | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) | 1.00 (0.98, 1.02) |
HOMA-IR, per 1 unit | - | - | - | 1.06 (0.98, 1.16) | 1.06 (0.98, 1.16) | 1.06 (0.98, 1.16) |
CRP, per 1 mg/L | - | - | - | 1.06 (0.98, 1.15) | 1.07 (0.99, 1.15) | 1.07 (0.99, 1.15) |
eGFR, per mL/min/1.73 m |
- | - | - | 0.99 (0.98, 1.01) | 0.99 (0.98, 1.01) | 0.99 (0.98, 1.01) |
Obesity, yes vs. no | - | - | - | - | 1.64 (1.01, 2.90) | 1.60 (0.88, 2.50) |
Metabolic health status, healthy vs. unhealthy | - | - | - | - | - | 0.42 (0.19, 0.99) |
HRs and their corresponding 95% CIs were obtained from Cox regression analysis.
Bold indicates statistically significant outcomes, i.e., p Abbreviations: SUA, serum uric acid; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-Reactive Protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR, Hazard ratio; HOMA-IR, Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol. |
Significant interactions were observed in analyses stratified by gender, obesity
and metabolic health status (all p values for interaction
Men | Women | |||
N, cases | 825/157 | 862/96 | Models adjusted for | |
HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
Model with SUA as continuous variable | Crude model | |||
per 1 mg/dL | 1.11 (0.97, 1.27) | 1.34 (1.13, 1.58) | ||
Model with SUA tertiles | ||||
1st | Ref | Ref | ||
2nd | 0.94 (0.59, 1.48) | 1.21 (0.67, 2.19) | ||
3rd | 1.52 (1.10, 2.33) | 2.16 (1.24, 3.76) | ||
Model with SUA as continuous variable | Model 1: Age, years of school, | |||
per 1 mg/dL | 0.99 (0.87, 1.14) | 1.20 (1.02, 1.77) | MedDietScore, alcohol consumption | |
Model with SUA tertiles | physical activity, current smoking | |||
1st | Ref | Ref | ||
2nd | 0.85 (0.52, 1.31) | 1.09 (0.60, 1.97) | ||
3rd | 1.35 (0.98, 2.09) | 1.94 (1.11, 3.38) | ||
Model with SUA as continuous variable | Model 2: Model 1 plus LDL-C, | |||
per 1 mg/dL | 0.95 (0.48, 1.24) | 1.01 (0.55, 1.85) | family history of CVD, ALT, AST, | |
Model with SUA tertiles | waist circumference, HOMA-IR, | |||
1st | Ref | Ref | CRP, eGFR, menopause status | |
2nd | 0.82 (0.51, 1.30) | 1.04 (0.57, 1.94) | (only in women) | |
3rd | 1.27 (0.97, 2.05) | 1.85 (1.05, 3.29) | ||
Model with SUA as continuous variable | Model 3: Model 2 plus obesity | |||
per 1 mg/dL | 0.93 (0.47, 1.21) | 0.98 (0.53, 1.81) | ||
Model with SUA tertiles | ||||
1st | Ref | Ref | ||
2nd | 0.78 (0.48, 1.24) | 1.01 (0.55, 1.85) | ||
3rd | 1.21 (0.93, 1.96) | 1.79 (1.04, 3.17) | ||
Model with SUA as continuous variable | Model 4: Model 3 plus metabolic health status | |||
per 1 mg/dL | 0.89 (0.45, 1.16) | 0.94 (0.50, 1.73) | ||
Model with SUA tertiles | ||||
1st | Ref | Ref | ||
2nd | 0.76 (0.47, 1.21) | 0.98 (0.53, 1.81) | ||
3rd | 1.18 (0.91, 1.92) | 1.75 (0.97, 3.01) | ||
HRs and their corresponding 95% CIs were obtained from Cox regression analysis.
Bold indicates statistically significant outcomes, i.e., p Abbreviations: SUA, serum uric acid; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; CVD, cardiovascular disease; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-Reactive Protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HR, Hazard ratio; HOMA-IR, Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol. |
1st tertile of SUA | 2nd tertile of SUA | 3rd tertile of SUA | ||
Stratified by | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |
A. Obesity status | ||||
Non obese | Ref | 0.95 (0.57, 2.10) | 1.47 (0.86, 2.90) | |
Obese | Ref | 1.06 (0.67, 1.91) | 1.89 (1.10, 3.20) | |
Obesity status * SUA: p for interaction = 0.02 | ||||
B. Metabolic health status | ||||
Metabolically Healthy | Ref | 1.12 (0.97, 1.87) | 2.10 (1.15, 3.23) | |
Metabolically unhealthy | Ref | 0.91 (0.62, 2.02) | 1.36 (0.81, 2.79) | |
Metabolic status * SUA: p for interaction = 0.04 | ||||
C. Combined obesity- and metabolic health- status | ||||
MHN | Ref | 1.09 (0.91, 1.69) | 1.95 (1.12, 3.10) | |
MHO | Ref | 1.09 (0.82, 1.89) | 1.99 (1.13, 3.21) | |
MUN | Ref | 0.93 (0.59, 2.06) | 1.41 (0.83, 2.82) | |
MUO | Ref | 1.10 (0.63, 1.95) | 1.59 (0.95, 3.01) | |
Combined obesity and metabolic status * SUA: p for interaction = 0.02 | ||||
HRs and their corresponding 95% CIs were obtained from Cox regression analysis
adjusted for age, (gender), body mass index, physical activity, current smoking,
MedDietScore, (history of hypertension, diabetes and hypercholesterolemia, in
case A) and family history of cardiovascular disease. Metabolically healthy
status was defined as the absence of hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes at
baseline. Bold indicates statistically significant outcomes, i.e., p Abbreviations: SUA, serum uric acid; MHN, metabolically healthy non-obese; MHO, metabolically healthy obese; MUN, metabolically unhealthy non-obese; MUO, metabolically unhealthy obese. |
As shown in Table 6, increased SUA levels (i.e., in the 3rd tertile) were related to almost twice as high CVD risk compared with the 1st tertile only in obese patients (HR 1.89, 95% CI: 1.10–3.20; p for interaction = 0.02) and not in non-obese individuals. Similar results were observed for metabolically healthy (HR 2.10, 95% CI: 1.15–3.23; p for interaction = 0.04) and not for metabolically unhealthy participants, as well as for MHO patients (HR 1.99, 95% CI: 1.13–3.21; p for interaction = 0.02) and not for MHN, MUN and MUO.
The ROC analysis is presented in Fig. 1. Based on the generated AUC, SUA seemed to better detect 10-year CVD events in women, but this was not significant. Further analysis showed that the cut-off points of SUA levels with the highest predictive capacity for CVD events were 5.05 mg/dL (0.29 mmol/L) for men and 4.15 mg/dL (0.24 mmol/L) for women.
Receiver operating characteristic curve to evaluate the predictive capacity of serum uric acid on 10-year cardiovascular disease incidence through the area under the curve (AUC) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) in male and female participants of the ATTICA study (n = 1687).
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between SUA levels and 10-year CVD incidence. Participants in the 2nd and 3rd SUA tertile had a 29% and 73% higher 10-year CVD incidence compared with those in the 1st tertile, irrespective of age and sex of the participants. However, after further adjustment for anthropometric, lifestyle, clinical and biochemical factors, the link between SUA and CVD incidence persisted only in participants in the 3rd SUA tertile; however, the later association was masked after adjusting for metabolic health status of the participants. Despite the potential limitations of the present, observational study, the results presented here deserves further attention from a clinical point of view. In particular, physicians should be aware of the increased CVD risk in individuals with higher SUA levels; obesity and other CVD risk factors should be early and aggressively treated in such patients. Nevertheless, further evidence is needed to establish SUA thresholds predicting CVD incidence in different populations.
In multi-adjusted gender-based analysis, SUA was independently associated with CVD incidence only in women; the 3rd SUA tertile had 79% greater 10-year CVD event risk compared with the 1st tertile. However, after adjustment for metabolic health status, this association lost significance. Obese patients in the 3rd SUA tertile had almost twice as high CVD incidence compared with those in the 1st tertile; this link was not observed in non-obese individuals. Similar findings were observed in metabolically healthy participants (and not for metabolically unhealthy ones) and in MHO patients (and not in MHN, MUN and MUO). Finally, the best SUA cut-off value to detect 10-year CVD incidence rate was 5.05 mg/dL (0.29 mmol/L) in men and 4.15 mg/dL (0.24 mmol/L) in women.
Overall, the present analysis showed that higher SUA levels were significantly related to a greater 10-year CVD incidence, especially in women. Such a gender-specific association has also been reported in a few studies [33, 34, 35, 36]. In particular, a subanalysis of the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study showed that a significant positive association was found between SUA levels and CVD morbidity only in women (n = 4963) and not in men (n = 4230) [35]. In a retrospective study, including 9139 apparently healthy individuals (i.e., without diabetes or CVD) followed-up for a mean of 4.8 years, the multivariate-adjusted HR for CVD incidence for each 1 mg/dL (0.06 mmol/L) increase in SUA levels was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.08–1.41) for women (n = 2559) and 1.06 (95% CI: 1.00–1.13) for men (n = 6580) [33]. In the Circulatory Risk in Communities Study (CIRCS) (n = 5235 men and 8185 women free from CVD, median follow-up: 23.1 years), the multivariable HR in the highest vs. lowest quintile of SUA levels for ischemic stroke was 1.61 (95% CI: 1.07–2.41) in women and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.70–1.41) in men [55].
The Research on Obesity and Diabetes among African Migrants (RODAM) cross-sectional study (n = 3864) reported that hyperuricemia correlated with 10-year CVD risk [assessed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) risk score [56]] in migrants, rural and urban residents; the risk was greater in women than in men in migrants [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.61 (95% CI: 3.05–6.97) vs. 1.73 (95% CI: 1.01–2.96), respectively], rural residents [adjusted OR 6.36 (95% CI: 2.98–13.56) vs. 3.28 (95% CI: 1.21–8.96), respectively] and urban residents [adjusted OR 2.11 (95% CI: 1.26–3.52) vs. 1.12 (95% CI: 0.45–2.81), respectively] [34]. In a population-based study (n = 1346 individuals), elevated SUA levels were related to MetS features in both genders; the association was greater in women than in men i.e., women in the 4th SUA tertile had a 4.18-fold increase of MetS risk compared with those in the 1st tertile, whereas the corresponding value for men was 3.29-fold increase [36].
In the subgroup analyses of the present study, a direct association between SUA levels and 10-year CVD incidence was observed in obese, metabolically healthy and MHO patients. These findings suggest that SUA could be used to further identify individual CVD risk in obese patients, especially those without other metabolic disorders (i.e., dyslipidemia, hypertension and hyperglycemia). There is a paucity of data in this field and more studies should be conducted to draw definitive conclusions.
In the present study, the optimal SUA threshold to detect 10-year CVD incidence
rate was 5.05 mg/dL (0.29 mmol/L) in men and 4.15 mg/dL (0.24 mmol/L) in women. A
few trials investigated such SUA cut-off points. In brief, the URRAH study found
that SUA cut-off values that predicted fatal myocardial infarction were 5.49
mg/dL (0.33 mmol/L) in men and 5.26 mg/dL (0.31 mmol/L) in women [37]. In the
RODAM study, SUA thresholds for the detection of 10-year CVD risk (defined by the
ACC/AHA risk score) were 6.77 mg/dL (0.40 mmol/L) in men and 5.15 mg/dL (0.31
mmol/L) in women [34]. Finally, the Progetto Ipertensione Umbria Monitoraggio
Ambulatoriale (PIUMA) study, involving 1720 untreated hypertensive patients
followed-up a mean of 12 years, reported that the lowest risk for CVD events was
observed at SUA levels 4.5–5.2 mg/dL (0.27–0.31 mmol/L) in men and 3.2–3.9
mg/dL (0.19–0.23 mmol/L) in women [57]; the highest CVD incidence was observed
at SUA
Overall, there are certain key results in relation to the present study. First
of all, SUA, at much lower concentrations than those defining hyperuricemia, may
predict 10-year CVD risk in both genders. However, this association seems greater
in women since it persisted after multi-adjustments. Secondly, there are
gender-specific SUA thresholds for CVD risk assessment, being lower in women
[i.e., 5.05 mg/dL (0.29 mmol/L) in men and 4.15 mg/dL (0.24 mmol/L) in women].
Third, the observed link between SUA and 10-year CVD incidence depended on the
presence of obesity and metabolically healthy status. Indeed, SUA levels
correlated with CVD morbidity in obese patients (and not in non-obese) and in
MHO. A positive relationship has been reported between SUA concentrations (at
levels of
The present study has some limitations. Only baseline measurements were taken into account; hence misclassifications of transitions or modifications cannot be precluded due to the extended interim periods between follow-up assessments. Furthermore, although there is a close relationship between renal function and SUA [59], adjusting for eGFR did not alter the association between SUA and CVD in our study. This could be attributed to the fact that renal function was normal for the vast majority of our participants as implied by the high eGFR values (in line with the generally low SUA levels recorded). Finally, information on uric acid treatments and other medications within the decade were not available. However, this study also has several strengths. First, we evaluated the gender-based effect of SUA levels on 10-year CVD incidence after adjusting for various conventional and novel risk factors. Secondly, sensitivity analyses were performed according to combined obesity- and metabolic- related status. Third, SUA cut-off points predicting 10-year CVD onset were estimated.
In conclusion, in the present analysis of the ATTICA cohort study, elevated SUA
levels were associated with increased risk to develop CVD within a decade. This
association was independent of other confounders, after multivariable analysis,
in women. SUA was also independently associated with 10-year CVD event in obese
and metabolically healthy individuals. SUA thresholds detecting 10-year CVD event
rate was 4.15 mg/dL (0.24 mmol/L) in women and 5.05 mg/dL (0.29 mmol/L) in men,
i.e., much lower than those defining hyperuricemia [
NK and MK interpreted the outcomes, wrote the manuscript and analyzed the data. DBP and CP designed the research study and critically reviewed the manuscript. CB, CC and DBM critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The ATTICA study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1989) of the World Medical Association. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics committee of Athens Medical School (#017/1.5.2001) and all participants were informed about the aims and procedures and agreed to participate providing written consent.
Not applicable.
The ATTICA study is supported by research grants from the Hellenic Cardiology Society [HCS2002] and the Hellenic Atherosclerosis Society [HAS2003]. The present work is also supported by a research grant from Hellenic Atherosclerosis Society.
NK has given talks, attended conferences and participated in trials sponsored by Angelini, Astra Zeneca, Bausch Health, Boehringer Ingelheim, Elpen, Mylan, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi and Servier. DPM has given talks and attended conferences sponsored by Amgen, Novo Nordisk and Libytec. CC has given talks sponsored by Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Elpen, Sanofi and Roche Diagnostics. MK, DBP, CP declare no conflict of interest. MK and DBP are the Guest Editors of this journal, given their roles as Guest Editors, had no involvement in the peer-review of this article and had no access to information regarding its peer-review.