IMR Press / JIN / Volume 19 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.31083/j.jin.2020.02.125
Open Access Rapid Report
Anterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture and functional outcome in short-term: clipping versus coiling
Show Less
1 University Hospital Berlin, Charite Berlin, Chariteplatz 1, Berlin, 10117, Germany
2 National Institute of Neurosurgery, Semmelweis University, Amerikai út 57, Budapest, 1145, Hungary
3 Columbia University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York, NY 10032, USA
*Correspondence: Henrik.Baecker@charite.de (Henrik Constantin Bäcker)
J. Integr. Neurosci. 2020, 19(2), 349–354; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.jin.2020.02.125
Submitted: 30 April 2020 | Revised: 9 June 2020 | Accepted: 20 June 2020 | Published: 30 June 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Bäcker et al. Published by IMR press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Abstract

Our research aims to assess the change in the grade of responsiveness using the Hunt and Hess score as well as the modified ranking scale in patients suffering from anterior communicating artery rupture. We retrospectively analyzed data from 11-patients who suffered from an anterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture that caused a subarachnoid hemorrhage. Severity was assessed using the Hunt and Hess scale grade and modified ranking scale. Anterior communicating artery rupture caused a subarachnoid hemorrhage in 40.81% of all aneurysm ruptures that took place at the Circle of Willis. Unfortunately, 4-patients deceased (3.4%) at a median age of 52-years (range 34-75-years), three of which deceased after coiling and one after clipping. In 71-patients (61.2%) endovascular coiling was performed - 33-males and 38-females - and in the remaining 45-cases, (38.8%) clipping was indicated - 24-males and 21-females. Overall, the pre-interventional median Hunt and Hess scale was 2, which remained after the intervention. When relating the outcome score to the intervention performed, we found that the Hunt and Hess scale score was 3 before coiling and 2 before clipping, whereas afterward, there was a slight increase to 2 and 2, respectively. The modified ranking scale was 2 after clipping, respectively, coiling (P = 0.218). No significant differences were observed between the different groups. Our results show that clipping is as effective as coiling in terms of the Hunt and Hess scale and the rate of mortality in the short-term.

Keywords
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
intracranial aneurysm
vascular disorders
neurological surgery
1. Introduction

Acute subarachnoid hemorrhages are often a result of a ruptured saccular intracranial aneurysm. These saccular aneurysms are found in the Circle of Willis (Gasparotti and Liserre, 2005) in 85% of patients, most frequently within the anterior communicating artery (ACoA) (30 to 40%) (Pierot et al., 1996). Patients with ruptured ACoA present with a variety of different dome projections, the involvement of branch and daughter vessels, which may result in different parenchymal damages, as well as neurological symptoms (Moon et al., 2015). The mortality rate for non-ruptured aneurysm intervention is described to be between 1.0% and 1.1% in coiling and between 2.6% to 3.8% in clipping (Keedy, 2006). In ruptured aneurysms, it is stated to be between 25% and 50% (Keedy, 2006).

Treatment procedures typically vary between wrapping, trapping, clipping, coiling, and sometimes proximal (Hunterian) ligation. Today, clipping and coiling are favored and therefore performed most frequently. For the last century, the gold standard was microsurgical clipping. However, in recent years, endovascular coiling has become more prevalent in clinics (Alreshidi et al., 2018; Deruty et al., 1996; Raftopoulos et al., 2003; Regli et al., 1999).

Coiling is typically thought to be slightly less invasive than clipping, due to the avoidance of large incisions and craniotomies. Therefore, authors have described morbidity and mortality in non-ruptured aneurysm prevention surgery to be at a lower risk in coiling than in clipping (Smith et al., 2015).

To assess the postoperative outcome, a variety of scores have been described. Today, the most common scales include the Hunt and Hess score (HH) (Hunt and Hess, 1968), the modified ranking scale (Broderick et al., 2017), and the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Grading system (WFNS)1(1988 Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a Universal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Grading Scale. Neurosurgery vol 68, pp. 985-986.).

The Hunt and Hess score was first described in 1968 and is one of the most frequently employed scores for identifying a changed state of responsiveness (Hunt and Hess, 1968; van Gijn et al., 1994). It utilizes both a neurological examination and the patient’s anamnesis to identify and correlate an appropriate responsiveness grade, especially before intervention (Singer et al., 2017).

2. Patients and methods

Inclusion criteria for our study consisted of patients older than 18 years who presented with ACoA rupture to the National Institute of Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary, who underwent either coiling or clipping. The diagnosis was revealed by radiological imaging - computed tomography, and the indication was made based on an interdisciplinary decision between the neurosurgeon and the interventional neurologist. Patients with severe neurological deficits were more likely to be coiled endovascularly. Exclusion criteria consisted of patients with aneurysm ruptures in any other location, patients who underwent a different treatment procedure, or patients younger than 18 years. Immediately after the intervention, patients were monitored in an intermediate care unit and transferred to a standard recovery room if the patient was stable without any significant neurological symptoms.

A total of 116 patients that fit our criteria were identified between 2010 (63 patients) and 2011 (53 patients). The radiological imaging and medical documentations were critically reviewed by a single investigator. Demographic data of the patients, including gender, ethnicity, age, residency aneurysm location, type of intervention, and comorbidities, were noted. Based on the anamnesis and clinical examinations at admission, the pre-interventional Hunt and Hess score was assessed in each case to minimize bias. Five days after the intervention, the anamnesis, clinical examinations, HH grade, and modified ranking scale were noted. When the HH was between two grades, we assumed the worse was present.

For calculations, Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics 25 were used. For categorical variables, the median and range were used. For normally distributed continuous variables, the mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated and presented to one decimal place. In our statistical analysis, a Mann-Whitney U test was performed to calculate the differences between the categorical variables. For normally distributed continuous variables, a t-test was applied. Furthermore, Hunt and Hess scores and the modified ranking scales percentages are presented.

3. Results

In total, 294 subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) resulted from non-traumatic aneurysm rupture and underwent treatment at our center between 2010 and 2011. The most common affected artery was the ACoA in 40.8%, followed by the middle cerebral artery in 31.0%, and basilar artery in 13.3%. In 9.2% of cases, a vertebral artery aneurysm rupture was identified as a cause of the SAH, and the remaining 5.8% were related to a posterior communicating artery aneurysm rupture.

Within the 116 patients who suffered from ACoA aneurysm rupture, gender was equally distributed; females were affected in 50.9% of cases (P = 0.476). The median age was 50 years (range 28 to 75 years). The median age for basilar artery aneurysm ruptures was 52 years (range 23 to 74years), middle cerebral artery aneurysm ruptures was 53 years (range 1 to 75years), vertebral artery aneurysm ruptures was 54 years (range 32 to 69 years) and posterior communicating artery aneurysm ruptures was 56 years (range 32 to 83years).

Unfortunately, 4 patients (one female and three male patients) deceased (3.4%) after intervention at a median age of 52 years (range 34 to 75 years). The endovascular coiling intervention had previously been performed in three patients, and the clipping procedure had been performed previously in one patient. In the instances of morbidity, the patients deceased in the mean of 12 days after hospital admission (range from 6 to 19 days) and 8.5 days after surgery was performed (range from 3 to 19 days).

When looking at the type of intervention performed, 71 patients (61.2%) underwent endovascular coiling, 33 men and 38 women, and in the remaining 45 cases (38.8%), the clipping procedure was performed (24 males and 21 females). There was a mean delay time of 2.3 ± 4.0 days between presentation to the emergency department and intervention. Although patients who underwent clipping were operated on slightly earlier (1.4 ± 2.0 vs. coiling 2.8 ± 4.7), no significances were found (P = 0.536).

In assessing neurological symptoms at admission, aphasia was present in the coiling group (n = 3). However, this improved after the intervention. Furthermore, facial paresis was observed in both groups (2 cases for each). Postoperatively, aphasia was observed in 4 patients, the clipping group, and paresis was observed in 9 patients that underwent coiling, and 3 that underwent clipping (delayed ischemic neurological deficit). The pre-interventional median responsiveness grade was 2 overall (range 1 to 4), which remained equivalent between pre- and postintervention in the median. Concerning the type of intervention, the Hunt and Hess grade was 3 (range 1 to 4) before the coiling procedure, whereas afterward, it improved slightly to 2 (range 1 to 4). Before the clipping procedure, the median pre-interventional grade was 2 (range 1 to 4), which remained the same after surgery (median 2; range 1 to 5). No significant difference was observed in the post interventional modified ranking scale (both medians 2 range 1 to 6; P = 0.218).

In 25 cases (21.6%), a ventricular drain was inserted to control the postoperative intracranial pressure, as these were Grade 4, according to Fisher Grade. Comorbidities included 51 patients suffering from hypertension, which has already been described in the literature as a predisposing factor, without any differences between the groups (P = 0.295). In 5 cases, the patients suffered from an aneurysm re-rupture. Females were predisposed, with 3 cases (40.0%) at a median age of 54 years (range from 54 to 65years). Out of these rerupture cases, 4 underwent coiling, and 1 underwent the clipping procedure. Unfortunately, one patient died after performing the coiling intervention.

All results are illustrated in Table 1.

Table 1 Patient characteristics’ and neurological state; percentages presented in brackets
Clipping Coiling Significances Overall
No. of patients 45 (38.8) 71 (61.2) 116
Female sex, in no. (%) 21 (46.7) 38 (53.5) 0.476 59 (50.9)
Median age median (range) 53 (28-75) 49 (33-70) 0.967 50 (28-75)
No. of deaths 1 (2.2) 3 (4.2) 0.580 4 (3.4)
Mean Hunt and Hess score median 2 (1-4) 3 (1-4) 2 (1-4)
Hunt and Hess score, no. before 0.203
1 22 (48.9) 19 (26.8) 41 (35.3)
2 11 (24.4) 16 (22.5) 27 (23.3)
3 9 (20.0) 25 (35.2) 34 (29.3)
4 3 (6.7) 11 (15.5) 14 (12.1)
5 0 0 0
Mean Hunt and Hess score median 2 (1-5) 2 (1-4) 0.006 2 (1-5)
Hunt and Hess score, no. after
1 11 (24.4) 9 (12.7) 20 (17.2)
2 19 (42.2) 36 (50.7) 55 (47.4)
3 12 (26.7) 14 (19.7) 26 (22.4)
4 2 (4.4) 12 (16.9) 14 (12.1)
5 1 (2.2) 0 1 (0.9)
Modified Ranking Scale median 2 (1-6) 2 (1-6) 0.218 2 (1-6)
0 9 (20.0) 11 (15.5) 20 (17.2)
1 9 (20.0) 9 (12.7) 18 (15.5)
2 11 (24.4) 17 (23.9) 28 (24.1)
3 6 (13.3) 14 (19.7) 21 (18.1)
4 3 (6.7) 11 (15.5) 14 (12.1)
5 6 (13.3) 6 (8.5) 12 (10.3)
6 1 (2.2) 3 (4.2) 4 (3.4)
Diabetes mellitus 2 (4.4) 1 (1.4) 0.307 3 (2.6)
Hypertension 17 (37.8) 33 (46.5) 0.295 51 (43.1)
4. Discussion

According to the literature, it seems that coiling procedures are becoming more and more popular. Since 2012, more coiling procedures are performed than clipping surgeries, leading to a replacement of the conventional surgical maneuvers (Suh, 2017). At our center, we identified that the coiling procedure had been performed more in 2010 (65.15%) than in 2011 (49.12%). Why such an increase in this particular period is of special interest for further investigation.

According to the literature, females over the age of 60 are at the highest risk for SAH. However, our data suggest that both genders are equally at risk, with males approximately 5.35 years younger (median 46 years) than females (54 years). One possible explanation for this may be the protecting effect of estrogen in females.

To evaluate patient responsiveness, we used the Hunt and Hess grade, as it is easy to apply and assess. Postoperatively, we assessed the modified ranking scale for clinical outcomes, even though some terms are instead somewhat vague, and symptoms may fit into different grades. Aulmann et al. (1998) performed a systematic review and found a suboptimal sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. The interobserver variability for the scale is moderate and stated to be between 0.41 and 0.48 (Degen et al., 2011; Lindsay et al., 1983; Oshiro et al.,1997). Additionally, it has been stated that there are significant differences in the outcome on follow-up, depending on the grades. Overall, grades 1 to 3 had better outcomes compared to grades 4 and 5 (Proust et al., 1995). This may explain why sometimes the Hunt and Hess grade I to III are merged to “good grade” and grade IV and V to “poor grade” (Schuss et al., 2013). However, we assume that it is better to present the cumulated average of the HH grade. Currently, the World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Grading Scale is accepted worldwide, since it is easy to use and compatible with formerly employed scales (Ducati et al., 1998). However, there are some limitations since aphasia can create confusion as this would be classified as verbal 1 in the Glasgow Coma Scale, and therefore graded as WFNS 4 instead of grade 2 or 3. On the other hand, patients with a focal deficit involving expressive language function with focal deficits may score verbal 5, but a WFNS grade 1 (Ogungbo, 2003).

In performing our literature review, the clipping technique seems to show a higher cumulative burden, like encephalomalacia in the frontal lobes (Hadjivassiliou et al., 2001), or mortality rate (Keedy, 2006) among patients compared with those who undergo coiling (Heit et al., 2017). These findings could not be confirmed in our study. Not surprisingly, coiling shows a higher incidence in ischemic, embolic infarction due to puncture of the vessels and symptomatic vasospasm (Jones et al., 2015). In contrast to the findings of Keedy (2006), Xia et al. (2017) and Krings et al. (2006) concluded that the risk and mortality in coiling are still greater. On the other hand, Heit et al. (2017) stated that the incidence of cerebral infarction in the vascular distribution of the recurrent artery of Heubner during clipping procedure was significantly higher than coiling related embolization, leading to a lesion in the medial and basal striatum (mainly the caudate head), memory dysfunction, and behavioral deficits (Martinaud et al., 2009; Mizuta and Motomura, 2006). Based on neuropsychological tests, it is postulated that the cognitive outcome after clipping has a more negative impact than coiling (Chan et al., 2002; Hadjivassiliou et al., 2001; Heit et al., 2017; Molyneux et al., 2005).

When considering the costs of hospitalization and intervention - i.e., devices - into account, it seems that coiling is still more expensive than in clipping, even though the patient’s overall hospital stay is shorter (Chang et al., 2016; Duan et al., 2015).

At our center, the short-term results revealed no improvement in the Hunt and Hess score before versus after the procedure for clipping (median H&H 2). In the coiling procedure, the pre-interventional grade was calculated to be 3 with an improvement to 2 after intervention. Likewise, the HH scale showed no significant differences in the modified ranking scale, which was 2 for clipping and coiling. The most common comorbidity was hypertension, which effected 51 patients. Seven patients deceased in total, three of them after initiating palliative/observational treatment and 4 after performing a procedure (3 after coiling, 4.22% and 1 after clipping, 2.22%). As far as the complications that were identified, symptomatic vasospasm was observed after coiling more often than after clipping procedure (11.3% versus 4.4%, overall 11.6%). Typically, it occurs between 4 and 14 days after the initial occurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhage and is symptomatic between 17 and 40% overall (Bracard and Schmitt, 2008). However, little is known about the impact of coiling or clipping on the incidence (de Oliveira et al., 2007).

Until today, no consensus on a gold standard in treatment exists so far. When summarizing the different results and comparing the literature, it seems that coiling and clipping are still comparable based on the clinical outcome in both short and long-term follow up (Bekelis et al., 2016; Wadd et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2016).

Based on its retrospective design, no blinded allocation of patients was performed, and a relatively small population was available for this single-center study. The intervention was performed after a delay of 1.4 ± 2.0 days for clipping, respectively, 2.8 ± 4.7 days for coiling. The postinterventional Hunt and Hess, as well as modified Ranking scores, were assessed five days after, which change tremendously over time, especially in the first few days. Our results suggest that clipping may still be slightly superior in the mortality rate and Hunt and Hess score than coiling, which may have changed in the recent years due to more physician experience and more specialized institutions.

Additionally, as stated earlier, the Hunt and Hess score itself may lead to some bias related to the interobserver variability. In 9 patients, the Hunt and Hess score was between 2 grades due to its definition. Therefore, we assumed the worse one. However, this also shows the limitation of the score. Although the WFNS is commonly used to assess the neurological status, we decided not to apply this. We only performed a short-term follow up within the hospitalization after the incidence, without long-term data. Therefore, complications such as pneumonia and heart diseases were not included.

Further investigation should be performed for long-term follow-up, i.e., 5 years after the intervention, which is why further research is ongoing. Neurocognitive deficits were not measured due to lack of long term follow up, resulting in a lack of information related to behavioral outcomes. Furthermore, according to the literature, there is a direct positive relation to the body mass index, which we did not assess. Rinaldo et al. (2018) determined that patients with a body mass index of greater than 32.3kg/m2 (as well as metabolic syndrome) had a lower frequency of poor functional outcome after 90 days or more.

Finally, we did not assess the Raymond-Roy occlusion classification after endovascular coiling, which can give information about the occlusion of the aneurysm. This has an impact on the risk of rupture, as well as the neurological outcome after intervention.

5. Conclusion

The highest incidence of aneurysm ruptures leading to subarachnoid hemorrhage occurs at the ACoA. Overall, females are predisposed, and males are approximately 5.35 years younger than females. Within the two years, no significant differences were observed between the clipping procedure and the coiling intervention, and thus far, no gold standard exists. This may be related to the limitations of the Hunt and Hess scale, which is not the optimal tool to assess outcomes after intervention. Further research is required to establish a gold standard in treatment as well as in the assessment of the outcome and for follow-up.

Author contributions

HCB, JV, and IN designed the research study. HCB performed the research. SCS provided help and advice on the experiments. HCB analyzed the data. HCB, SCS, and IN wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research was retrospectively conducted with blinded data, and approved by the Internal Review Board of Semmelweis University.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to all the peer reviewers and editors for their opinions and suggestions. We acknowledge support from the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Funds of Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they don’t have any conflict of interest related to this study.

References
[1]
Alreshidi, M., Cote, D. J., Dasenbrock, H. H., Acosta, M., Can, A., Doucette, J., Simjian, T., Hulou, M. M., Wheeler, L. A., Huang, K., Zaidi, H. A., Du, R., Aziz-Sultan, M. A., Mekary, R. A. and Smith, T. R. (2018) Coiling versus microsurgical clipping in the treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: A meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 83, 879-889. 10.1093/neuros/nyx623https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/article/83/5/879/4847331
[2]
Aulmann, C., Steudl, W. I. and Feldmann, U. (1998) Validation of the prognostic accuracy of neurosurgical admission scales after rupture of cerebral aneurysms. Zentralblatt für Neurochirurgie 59, 171-180.
[3]
Bekelis, K., Gottlieb, D., Su, Y., O'Malley, A. J., Labropoulos, N., Goodney, P. and MacKenzie, T. A. (2016) Surgical clipping versus endovascular coiling for elderly patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 8, 913-918. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-01189026311713https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26311713
[4]
Bracard, S. and Schmitt, E. (2008) Vasospasm and delayed consequences. Interventional Neuroradiology 14, 17-22. 20557770https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20557770
[5]
Broderick, J. P., Adeoye, O. and Elm, J. (2017) Evolution of the modified Rankin scale and its use in future stroke trials. Stroke 48, 2007-2012. 28626052https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28626052
[6]
Chan, A., Ho, S. and Poon, W. S. (2002) Neuropsychological sequelae of patients treated with microsurgical clipping or endovascular embolization for anterior communicating artery aneurysm. European Neurology 47, 37-44. 11803191https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11803191
[7]
Chang, H. W., Shin, S. H., Suh, S. H., Kim, B. S. and Rho, M. H. (2016) Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for intracranial aneurysms in the republic of Korea. Neurointervention 11, 86-91. 10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.2.8627621944https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27621944
[8]
de Oliveira, J. G., Beck, J., Ulrich, C., Rathert, J., Raabe, A. and Seifert, V. (2007) Comparison between clipping and coiling on the incidence of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgical Review 30, 22-30. 10.1007/s10143-006-0045-5138fe8e1-50f4-41c1-8721-5cfadc0e2462http://www.springerlink.com/content/n6vt786135722232/
[9]
Degen, L. A., Dorhout Mees, S. M., Algra, A. and Rinkel, G. J. (2011) Interobserver variability of grading scales for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 42, 1546-1549. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.601211f9ffa0f6-45cb-41c5-b0c7-cc6b6292f351http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.601211
[10]
Deruty, R., Pelissou-Guyotat, I., Mottolese, C. and Amat, D. (1996) Management of unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Neurological Research 18, 39-44. 10.1080/01616412.1996.117403758714535https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8714535
[11]
Duan, Y., Blackham, K., Nelson, J., Selman, W. and Bambakidis, N. (2015) Analysis of short-term total hospital costs and current primary cost drivers of coiling versus clipping for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 7, 614-618. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-01124924891453https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24891453
[12]
Ducati, A. (1998) The clinical grading of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Minerva Anestesiological 64, 109-112.
[13]
Gasparotti, R. and Liserre, R. (2005) Intracranial aneurysms. European Radiology 15, 441-447. 15678323https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15678323
[14]
Hadjivassiliou, M., Tooth, C. L., Romanowski, C. A., Byrne, J., Battersby, R. D., Oxbury, S., Crewswell, C. S., Burkitt, E., Stokes, N. A., Paul, C., Mayes, A. R. and Sagar, H. J. (2001) Aneurysmal sah: cognitive outcome and structural damage after clipping or coiling. Neurology 56, 1672-1677. 11425932https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11425932
[15]
Heit, J. J., Ball, R. L., Telischak, N. A., Do, H. M., Dodd, R. L., Steinberg, G. K., Chang, S. D., Wintermark, M. and Marks, M. P. (2017) Patient outcomes and cerebral infarction after ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm treatment. American Journal of Neuroradiology 38, 2119-2125. 10.3174/ajnr.A5355http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/doi/10.3174/ajnr.A5355
[16]
Hunt, W. E. and Hess, R. M. (1968) Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. Journal of Neurosurgery 28, 14-20. 5635959https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5635959
[17]
Jones, J., Sayre, J., Chang, R., Tian, J., Szeder, V., Gonzalez, N., Jahan, R., Vinuela, F., Duckwiler, G. and Tateshima, S. (2015) Cerebral vasospasm patterns following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: an angiographic study comparing coils with clips. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 7, 803-807. 25230840https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25230840
[18]
Keedy, A. (2006) An overview of intracranial aneurysms. McGill Journal of Medicine 9, 141-146. 18523626https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18523626
[19]
Krings, T., Willmes, K., Becker, R., Meister, I. G., Hans, F. J., Reinges, M. H., Mull, M. and Thron, A. (2006) Silent microemboli related to diagnostic cerebral angiography: a matter of operator's experience and Patient's Disease. Neuroradiology 48, 387-393. 16586116https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16586116
[20]
Lindsay, K. W., Teasdale, G. M. and Knill-Jones, R. P. (1983) Observer variability in assessing the clinical features of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Journal of Neurosurgery 58, 57-62. 6847910https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6847910
[21]
Martinaud, O., Perin, B., Gerardin, E., Proust, F., Bioux, S., Gars, D. L., Hannequin, D. and Godefroy, O. (2009) Anatomy of executive deficit following ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm. European Journal of Neurology 16, 595-601. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02546.x19236465https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19236465
[22]
Mizuta, H. and Motomura, N. (2006) Memory dysfunction in caudate infarction caused by Huebner's recurring artery occlusion. Brain and Cognition 61, 133-138. 16510225https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16510225
[23]
Molyneux, A. J., Kerr, R. S., Yu, L. M., Clarke, M., Sneade, M., Yarnold, J. A., Sandercock, P. and International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial Collaborative Group. (2005) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (Isat) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366, 809-817. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67214-516139655https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16139655
[24]
Moon, K., Levitt, M. R., Almefty, R. O., Nakaji, P., Albuquerque, F. C., Zabramski, J. M., McDougall, C. G. and Spetzler, R. F. (2015) Treatment of ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysms: equipoise in the endovascular era? Randomized Controlled Trial 77, 566-571.
[25]
Ogungbo, B. (2003) The world federation of neurological surgeons scale for subarachnoid haemorrhage. Surgical Neurology 59, 236-237. 12681565https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12681565
[26]
Oshiro, E. M., Walter, K. A., Piantadosi, S., Witham, T. F. and Tamargo, R. J. (1997) A new subarachnoid hemorrhage grading system based on the Glasgow coma scale: a comparison with the Hunt and Hess and world federation of neurological surgeons scales in a clinical series. Neurosurgery 41, 140-147. 10.1097/00006123-199707000-000299218306https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9218306
[27]
Pierot, L., Boulin, A., Castaings, L., Rey, A. and Moret, J. (1996) Endovascular treatment of pericallosal artery aneurysms. Neurological Research 18, 49-53. 8714537https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8714537
[28]
Proust, F., Hannequin, D., Langlois, O., Freger, P. and Creissard, P. (1995) Causes of morbidity and mortality after ruptured aneurysm surgery in a series of 230 patients. The importance of control angiography. Stroke 26, 1553-1557. 7660397https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7660397
[29]
Raftopoulos, C., Goffette, P., Vaz, G., Ramzi, N., Scholtes, J. L., Wittebole, X. and Mathurin, P. (2003) Surgical clipping may lead to better results than coil embolization: results from a series of 101 consecutive unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 52, 1280-1287. 12762873https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12762873
[30]
Regli, L., Uske, A. and de Tribolet, N. (1999) Endovascular coil placement compared with surgical clipping for the treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a consecutive series. Journal of Neurosurgery 90, 1025-1030. 10.3171/jns.1999.90.6.102510350247https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10350247
[31]
Rinaldo, L., Hughes, J. D., Rabinstein, A. A. and Lanzino, G. (2018) Effect of body mass index on outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage treated with clipping versus coiling. Journal of Neurosurgery 129, 658-669. 10.3171/2017.4.JNS1755729027862https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29027862
[32]
Schuss, P., Konczalla, J., Platz, J., Vatter, H., Seifert, V. and Guresir, E. (2013) Aneurysm-related subarachnoid hemorrhage and acute subdural hematoma: single-center series and systematic review. Journal of Neurosurgery 118, 984-990. 10.3171/2012.11.JNS12143523289820https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23289820
[33]
Singer, R. J., Ogilvy, C. S. and Rordorf, G. (2017) Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales. UpToDate, Inc.
[34]
Smith, T. R., Cote, D. J., Dasenbrock, H. H., Hamade, Y. J., Zammar, S. G., El Tecle, N. E., Batjer, H. H. and Bendok, B. R. (2015) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of endovascular coiling versus microsurgical clipping for unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 84, 942-953. 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.05.07326093360https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26093360
[35]
Suh, S. H. (2017) The annual trends between neurointerventional and neurosurgical procedures in Korea: analysis using hira data from 2010 to 2016. Neurointervention 12, 77-82. 28955509https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28955509
[36]
Van Gijn, J., Bromberg, J. E., Lindsay, K. W., Hasan, D. and Vermeulen, M. (1994) Definition of initial grading, specific events, and overall outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A survey. Stroke 25, 1623-1627. 10.1161/01.str.25.8.16238042214https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8042214
[37]
Wadd, I. H., Haroon, A., Habibullah, Ansari, S., Mukhtar, S., Rashid, U. and Vohra, A. H. (2015) Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: outcome of aneurysm clipping versus coiling in anterior circulation aneurysm. Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan 25, 798-801.
[38]
Xia, Z. W., Liu, X. M., Wang, J. Y., Cao, H., Chen, F. H., Huang, J., Li, Q. Z., Fan, S. S., Jiang, B., Chen, Z. G. and Cheng, Q. (2017) Coiling is not superior to clipping in patients with high-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurgery 98, 411-420. 27867126https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27867126
[39]
Zhao, B., Tan, X., Yang, H., Li, Z., Zheng, K., Xiong, Y., Zhong, M. and AMPAS Group. (2016) Endovascular coiling versus surgical clipping for poor-grade ruptured intracranial aneurysms: postoperative complications and clinical outcome in a multicenter poor-grade aneurysm study. American Journal of Neuroradiology 37, 873-878. 26721769https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26721769
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Share
Back to top