IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 30 / Issue 4 / pii/2003048

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology (CEOG) is published by IMR Press from Volume 47 Issue 1 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with S.O.G.

Original Research

Efficacy of sharing oocytes from compensated donors between two recipients

Show Less
1 The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Camden, NJ (USA)
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 30(4), 199–200;
Published: 10 December 2003
Abstract

Purpose: To see if sharing of donated oocytes from a compensated donor lowers outcome following embryo transfer compared to recipients keeping all oocytes. Method: Retrospective review. Recipients have the option of keeping all oocytes or sharing to reduce costs. Results: There were equal clinical, and ongoing/delivered pregnancy rates and implantation rates in the two groups. There were almost twice as many frozen embryos available to recipients who did not share for potential future use. Conclusions: Sharing of oocytes between two recipients reduces the financial burden for the recipient without affecting efficacy Such a policy would make more oocytes available to recipients and thus shorten the long waiting times.

Keywords
Donated oocytes
Recipients
Sharing
Financial compensation
Share
Back to top