IMR Press / RCM / Volume 25 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2501008
Open Access Systematic Review
Machine Learning for Detecting Atrial Fibrillation from ECGs: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Show Less
1 Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of TCM Diagnostics, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, 410208 Changsha, Hunan, China
2 School of Acupuncture and Tui-na and Rehabilitation, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, 410208 Changsha, Hunan, China
3 School of Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, 410208 Changsha, Hunan, China
4 Cardiovascular Department, the First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, 410021 Changsha, Hunan, China
*Correspondence: ljhtcm1@163.com (Jianhe Liu); lianghao@hnucm.edu.cn (Hao Liang)
Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2024, 25(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2501008
Submitted: 14 May 2023 | Revised: 11 August 2023 | Accepted: 29 August 2023 | Published: 8 January 2024
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that can result in adverse cardiovascular outcomes but is often difficult to detect. The use of machine learning (ML) algorithms for detecting AF has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. This study aims to systematically evaluate and summarize the overall diagnostic accuracy of the ML algorithms in detecting AF in electrocardiogram (ECG) signals. Methods: The searched databases included PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar. The selected studies were subjected to a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy to synthesize the sensitivity and specificity. Results: A total of 14 studies were included, and the forest plot of the meta-analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94–0.99) and 97% (95% CI: 0.95–0.99), respectively. Compared to traditional machine learning (TML) algorithms (sensitivity: 91.5%), deep learning (DL) algorithms (sensitivity: 98.1%) showed superior performance. Using multiple datasets and public datasets alone or in combination demonstrated slightly better performance than using a single dataset and proprietary datasets. Conclusions: ML algorithms are effective for detecting AF from ECGs. DL algorithms, particularly those based on convolutional neural networks (CNN), demonstrate superior performance in AF detection compared to TML algorithms. The integration of ML algorithms can help wearable devices diagnose AF earlier.

Keywords
machine learning
atrial fibrillation
ECG
meta-analysis
Funding
82274411/National Natural Science Foundation of China
2022RC1021/Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province
2022JJ40300/Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province
202210541033/National College Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program Project
S202310541016/Hunan Provincial College Student Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program Project
Figures
Fig. 1.
Share
Back to top