- Academic Editor
†These authors contributed equally.
Background: This study sought to
evaluate the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) defined by the Kidney
Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) group in patients supported by
veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) after post-cardiotomy
cardiogenic shock (PCS), and to identify the risk factors for AKI
Post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCS) in cardiac surgery is associated with a survival rate of only 25–44% [1]. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) can be a life-saving procedure for temporary mechanical circulatory support, and its use in PCS patients has increased in recent years [2]. Although VA ECMO provides a period for cardiac recovery, complications and mortality remain significant. The survival rate has fluctuated between 20.8% and 65.4% amongst various centers with complications including strokes, acute kidney injury (AKI), bleeding, and thrombotic events [3, 4, 5]. AKI requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is particularly common in patients with PCS supported with VA ECMO, which negatively effects survival [3, 5, 6]. Identifying and managing risk factors for AKI will help decrease the incidence of AKI in this population.
It has been reported that earlier implantation of VA ECMO may help prevent the
occurrence (65.7%) of stage 3 AKI defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving
Global Outcomes (KDIGO) group in France [7]. The duration of low cardiac output
associated with PCS may determine organ dysfunction. Because ethnic differences
and the heterogeneity in ECMO management in different centers, we sought to
evaluate the incidence and outcomes of AKI
This observational, single-center respective study, was approved by the Fuwai Hospital Ethics Committee (2021-1496). Due to the retrospective design of this study, signed informed consent was waived. All patient data were anonymized.
Patients 18 years and older undergoing a single VA ECMO run for PCS between January 2009 and December 2020 were included. The exclusion criteria were: (1) heart transplantation patients; (2) patients with preoperative ECMO or undergoing more than one ECMO run; and (3) patients with chronic hemodialysis.
The decision for implantation or weaning of VA ECMO was decided by the ECMO management team, which consisted of a cardiac surgeon, intensive care specialist, and a perfusionist. Nearly 90% of peripheral cannulations were performed percutaneously (through the femoral vein and artery), which allows for chest closure and can reduce mediastinal bleeding. Central aortic cannulation was performed through the sternum with the cannulas already in place for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for the patients who developed an aortic dissection or pulmonary dysfunction. The anticoagulation management of VA ECMO is summarized in the Supplementary Files. The goal after VA ECMO support was to reduce intravenous inotropes to allow optimal myocardial recovery. Cardiopulmonary recovery was assessed daily by clinical, echocardiographic, and hemodynamic measurements to define the optimal weaning time.
The primary endpoint was the incidence of AKI
AKI was defined according to the KDIGO guideline. The definition of AKI
The data are expressed as mean
A total of 136 patients with a mean age of 53.6
Variables | No. of patients | Variables | No. of patients | |
Age, year, Mean |
53.6 |
ECMO cannulation | ||
Gender, male, n (%) | 91 (66.9) | Central cannulation, n (%) | 16 (11.8) | |
BMI, kg/m |
24.2 |
Peripheral cannulation, n (%) | 120 (88.2) | |
Charlson Comorbidity Index | Special Treatment | |||
0, n (%) | 48 (35.3) | CRRT, n (%) | 93 (68.4) | |
1, n (%) | 28 (20.6) | ECMO time, hour, Median (IQR) | 114.3 (44.1, 150.5) | |
2, n (%) | 29 (21.3) | Intraoperative transfusion, n (%) | 81 (59.6) | |
3, n (%) | 23 (16.9) | Postoperative transfusion, n (%) | 125 (91.9) | |
4, n (%) | 7 (5.1) | Ventilation time, hour, Median (IQR) | 153.0 (27.5, 436.6) | |
5, n (%) | 1 (0.7) | Outcomes | ||
Type of Surgery | AKI 1, n (%) | 16 (11.8) | ||
CABG, n (%) | 30 (22.1) | AKI 2, n (%) | 18 (13.2) | |
Valvular Surgery, n (%) | 33 (24.3) | AKI |
80 (58.8) | |
Aortic arch surgery, n (%) | 13 (9.6) | Septicemia, n (%) | 25 (18.4) | |
CABG + Valvular Surgery, n (%) | 18 (13.2) | Pneumonia, n (%) | 35 (25.7) | |
Congenital heart operation, n (%) | 18 (13.2) | Atrial fibrillation, n (%) | 57 (41.9) | |
CABG + Aortic arch surgery, n (%) | 11 (8.1) | Liver dysfunction, n (%) | 30 (22.1) | |
Others*, n (%) | 13 (9.6) | Malignant arrhythmia, n (%) | 71 (52.2) | |
ICU Stay, hour, Median (IQR) | 264 (132, 540) | Cerebrovascular accident, n (%) | 11 (8.1) | |
Hospital Stay, day, Median (IQR) | 22.4 (9.4, 41.4) | In-hospital Death, n (%) | 81 (59.6) | |
* Pulmonary Endarterectomy, Pericardiectomy, Morrow, and Ventricular aneurysm
surgery.
AKI, acute kidney injury; BMI, body mass index; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; ICU, intensive care unit; IQR, interquartile range. |
Complications that VA ECMO patients experienced included infections, and
involved the circulatory, digestive and other systems. 18.4% (25/136) of
patients suffered septicemia. 25.7% (35/136) patients developed pneumonia.
52.2% (71/136) patients experienced malignant arrhythmias and 57 patients had
atrial fibrillation. Laboratory tests showed that 30 patients had liver
dysfunction, and 8.1% (11/136) of patients suffered a cerebrovascular accident. The
in-hospital mortality was 59.6% (81/136) (Table 1). Patients were grouped
according to the occurrence of AKI
To investigate the potential risk factors for AKI
Variables | AKI |
AKI |
OR | 95% CI | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age, year, Mean |
55.1 |
52.6 |
0.987 | (0.963, 1.012) | 0.323 | |
Gender, male, n (%) | 40 (71.4) | 50 (62.5) | 1.640 | (0.779, 3.454) | 0.193 | |
BMI, kg/m |
24.2 |
24.3 |
1.008 | (0.929, 1.093) | 0.856 | |
Charlson Comorbidity index | ||||||
0, n (%) | 22 (39.3) | 26 (32.5) | Reference | |||
1, n (%) | 8 (14.3) | 20 (25.0) | 2.115 | (0.780, 5.735) | 0.141 | |
2, n (%) | 14 (25.0) | 15 (18.8) | 0.907 | (0.360, 2.283) | 0.835 | |
3, n (%) | 8 (14.3) | 15 (18.8) | 1.587 | (0.567, 4.439) | 0.379 | |
4, n (%) | 3 (5.4) | 4 (5.0) | 1.128 | (0.228, 5.594) | 0.883 | |
5, n (%) | 1 (1.8) | 0 (0) | 0.0 | (0, 0) | ||
EF, %, Median (IQR) | 58 (53, 63) | 60 (55, 64) | 1.030 | (0.991, 1.071) | 0.137 | |
Preoperative Laboratory test | ||||||
CK, U/L, Median (IQR) | 62 (48, 86) | 58 (47, 84) | 1.003 | (0.995, 1.011) | 0.443 | |
PTA, %, Median (IQR) | 91 (78, 98) | 92 (74, 101) | 1.000 | (0.984, 1.016) | 0.987 | |
ALT, U/L, Median (IQR) | 19 (14, 30) | 23 (14, 32) | 0.999 | (0.980, 1.019) | 0.951 | |
AST, U/L, Median (IQR) | 23 (18, 30) | 24 (18, 29) | 1.002 | (0.970, 1.034) | 0.917 | |
CRP, mg/L, Median (IQR) | 2.10 (0.66, 4.63) | 1.67 (0.80, 3.63) | 0.948 | (0.838, 1.072) | 0.394 | |
TB, |
15.90 (11.30, 25.22) | 17.92 (11.65, 27.98) | 1.006 | (0.979, 1.034) | 0.650 | |
DB, |
3.63 (2.38, 6.70) | 4.28 (2.34, 6.76) | 1.008 | (0.926, 1.097) | 0.856 | |
TG, mmol/L, Median (IQR) | 1.33 (1.02, 2.16) | 1.06 (0.88, 1.32) | 0.768 | (0.503, 1.172) | 0.220 | |
Albumin, g/L, Median (IQR) | 39.5 (38.5, 42.8) | 40.6 (38.4, 42.9) | 0.984 | (0.906, 1.067) | 0.692 | |
Platelet, |
188.8 |
176.9 |
0.997 | (0.992, 1.002) | 0.290 | |
HDL-C, mmol/L, Median (IQR) | 1.03 (0.89, 1.24) | 1.06 (0.88, 1.32) | 1.706 | (0.514, 5.665) | 0.383 | |
LDL-C, mmol/L, Median (IQR) | 2.47 (1.89, 3.05) | 2.23 (1.74, 2.82) | 0.716 | (0.463, 1.106) | 0.132 | |
Creatinine, |
82.3 (72.0, 94.8) | 86.4 (69.8, 98.1) | 0.996 | (0.983, 1.010) | 0.605 | |
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartic transaminase; BMI, body mass index; CK, creatine, kinase; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reaction protein; DB, direct bilirubin; EF, ejection fraction; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; MAP, mean artery pressure; PTA, Prothrombin activity; OR, odds ratio; RBC, red blood cell; TB, total bilirubin; TG, triglyceride; TP, total protein. |
Variables | AKI |
AKI |
OR | 95% CI | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intraoperative Factors | ||||||
Transfusion rate, n (%) | 30 (53.6) | 51 (63.7) | 1.524 | (0.760, 3.055) | 0.235 | |
CPB time, min, Median (IQR) | 260 (137, 455) | 236 (119, 351) | 0.998 | (0.996, 1.000) | 0.025 | |
RBC transfusion, U, Median (IQR) | 0 (0, 4) | 0 (0, 4) | 1.036 | (0.949, 1.130) | 0.433 | |
FFP transfusion, mL, Median (IQR) | 200 (0, 700) | 400 (0, 800) | 1.000 | (0.999, 1.001) | 0.756 | |
Platelet transfusion, U, Median (IQR) | 0 (0, 1) | 0 (0, 1) | 1.440 | (0.892, 2.323) | 0.135 | |
Cross-clamp time, min, Median (IQR) | 100 (68, 184) | 100 (55, 150) | 0.996 | (0.991, 1.000) | 0.072 | |
Epinephrine, mg/kg/min, Mean |
0.058 |
0.061 |
1.851 | (0.013, 265.89) | 0.808 | |
Dopamine, mg/kg/min, Mean |
4.56 |
4.77 |
1.019 | (0.918, 1.132) | 0.719 | |
Norepinephrine, mg/kg/min, Mean |
0.075 |
0.064 |
0.744 | (0.121, 4.563) | 0.179 | |
Variables at VA ECMO Implantation | ||||||
MAP, mmHg, Mean |
65 |
58 |
0.965 | (0.936, 0.994) | 0.020 | |
Heart Beat, bpm, Mean |
104 |
104 |
1.001 | (0.980, 1.022) | 0.946 | |
Lactate, mmol/L, Mean |
8.3 |
10.3 |
1.068 | (0.989, 1.154) | 0.095 | |
Intraoperative ECMO, n (%) | 46 (82.1) | 49 (61.3) | 0.344 | (0.152, 0.779) | 0.011 | |
Peripheral cannulation, n (%) | 52 (92.9) | 68 (85.0) | 0.436 | (0.133, 1.430) | 0.171 | |
Speed, rpm, Mean |
3224 |
3145 |
1.000 | (0.998, 1.001) | 0.403 | |
Flow rate, L/min, Mean |
2.9 |
3.0 |
1.000 | (1.000, 1.001) | 0.392 | |
AKI, acute kidney injury; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CI, confidence interval; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; FFP, fresh frozen plasma; MAP, mean arterial pressure; ICU, intensive care unit; OR, odds ratio; RBC, red blood cell; VA ECMO, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. |
Variables | OR | 95% CI | p | Tolerance | VIF | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | 0.000 | 1.000 | (0.962, 1.038) | 0.984 | 0.870 | 1.150 |
CPB time | 0.000 | 1.000 | (0.997, 1.003) | 0.976 | 0.701 | 1.427 |
Cross-clamp time | –0.004 | 0.996 | (0.989, 1.003) | 0.242 | 0.706 | 1.416 |
EF preoperatively | 0.044 | 1.045 | (0.987, 1.106) | 0.128 | 0.893 | 1.119 |
Early ECMO implantation* | –1.210 | 0.298 | (0.096, 0.925) | 0.036 | 0.829 | 1.206 |
MAP before ECMO implantation | –0.024 | 0.976 | (0.942, 1.012) | 0.194 | 0.879 | 1.138 |
Lactate before ECMO implantation | –0.002 | 0.966 | (0.907, 1.098) | 0.998 | 0.845 | 1.184 |
*Implantation of ECOM in operation room vs. Implantation of ECMO in intensive care unit. CI, confidence interval; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; EF, ejection fraction; MAP, mean arterial pressure; OR, odds ratio; VIF, variance inflation factor. |
To evaluate the incidence and impact of AKI
A previous meta-analysis found that the incidence of AKI during ECMO treatment
was 72% and the incidence of AKI
In 2021, a retrospective analysis demonstrated that mortality was increased in
those patients who developed AKI during VA ECMO after cardiac surgery [12].
However, in our study the in-hospital mortality of AKI
The etiology of AKI after ECMO treatment is related to prerenal and renal
factors, such as red cell distribution width, baseline left ventricular ejection
fraction, and serum lactate levels at the initiation of ECMO [6, 13]. Before
surgery, all cardiac surgery patients are evaluated for abnormalities in renal
function. Our data showed that the demographic characteristics and intraoperative
factors were not associated with the occurrence of AKI
Our study has several limitations. Undetected or identified confounders may have
biased the regression analysis because of its retrospective and single center
design. The complications were described in Table 1. However, we could not assess
the timing of each complication. Hence, we could not investigate whether these
complications are risk factors or outcomes for AKI
In summary, the incidence of AKI
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
JCQ, WDY and BYJ designed the research study. JCQ, WDY, GL and YT performed the research. SZG, JW, BYZ and SJY provided help and advice on data collection. JCQ and WDY analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This observational single-center respective study was approved by the Fuwai Hospital Ethics Committee (2021-1496). Due to the retrospective design of this study, signed informed consent was waived. All patient data were anonymized.
Not applicable.
This research received no external funding.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.