IMR Press / RCM / Volume 24 / Issue 11 / DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2411322
Open Access Original Research
Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Levels are Associated with Arterial Stiffness Measured by Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis
Show Less
1 Division of Nephrology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, 62247 Chiayi, Taiwan
2 School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, 97004 Hualien, Taiwan
3 Division of Nephrology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, 97004 Hualien, Taiwan
*Correspondence: tsaininimd1491@gmail.com (Jen-Pi Tsai)
These authors contributed equally.
Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 24(11), 322; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2411322
Submitted: 21 July 2023 | Revised: 15 August 2023 | Accepted: 22 August 2023 | Published: 23 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lipoproteins and Lipids in Cardiovascular Disease)
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Arterial stiffness (AS) can be used to predict future cardiovascular diseases. High lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels were independently correlated with cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and death in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. The cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) is a useful biomarker of arteriosclerotic disorders and has a close relationship with a variety of CV events. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between serum Lp(a) levels and AS in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) using the CAVI. Methods: A total of 86 adult patients who were on regular PD for at least 3 months were recruited in this study. The CAVI values were determined using the waveform device (VaSera VS-1000). A CAVI value of 9.0 on either side was defined as high. Serum Lp(a) levels were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: Among these participants, 35 of 86 (40.7%) belonged to the high CAVI group. In contrast to those with a normal CAVI, PD recipients in the high CAVI group had higher serum levels of total cholesterol (p = 0.003), triglycerides (p = 0.044), C-reactive protein (p < 0.001), and Lp(a) (p < 0.001), whereas their albumin levels were significantly lower (p = 0.026). Based on multivariable logistic regression analysis, serum Lp(a) (odds ratio [OR] 1.025, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.010–1.040, p = 0.001), total cholesterol (OR 1.042, 95% CI 1.005–1.081, p = 0.027), and C-reactive protein (each increase 0.1 mg/dL, OR 1.217, 95% CI 1.008–1.469, p = 0.041) levels were found as the parameters that could independently predict AS in patients on PD. Further, using Spearman’s correlation analysis, both the left and right CAVIs revealed a significantly positive correlation with log-transformed Lp(a) levels (r = 0.588, p < 0.001; r = 0.639, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Serum Lp(a) levels were postulated to participate in the pathogenic processes of AS in adult patients undergoing PD.

Keywords
cardio-ankle vascular index
arterial stiffness
lipoprotein(a)
peritoneal dialysis
1. Introduction

Cardiovascular (CV) diseases contribute to a significant proportion of comorbidity conditions and mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) [1]. Risk factors for CV diseases in patients undergoing regular peritoneal dialysis (PD) are classified as traditional (hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, age, sex, and family history), nontraditional (inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and protein carbamylation), and uremia-specific (uremic toxins, volume overload, hyperparathyroidism, hyperphosphatemia, and vascular calcification) factors [2]. Increased arterial stiffness (AS) is a critical estimator of CV events, CV mortality, and death in patients with ESKD [3, 4]. Pathogenetic factors underlying arterial stiffening included a change in the elastin-to-collagen ratio, altered lipid metabolism, oxidative stress, genetic mutations, and epigenetic regulation [5]. Furthermore, a close association was reported between AS and atherosclerosis [6, 7].

The cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) is a noninvasive parameter of global AS from the aorta to the tibial arteries. Compared with the carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), the CAVI was considered to be less operator dependent and not influenced by blood pressure during the measurement [8, 9]. The CAVI was reported as being positively associated with the left atrial chamber size, indices of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, such as the E/A ratio, and the left ventricular mass index [10]. In a small cross-sectional study in Taiwan, patients receiving PD regularly demonstrated a high prevalence of AS, when measured by the CAVI [11]. Compared with the general population, patients on hemodialysis have a significantly higher CAVI [12], which can be used to predict all-cause deaths in individuals on regular hemodialysis therapy [13].

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), which is produced primarily in the hepatic parenchyma, comprises a low-density lipoprotein core complexed with glycoprotein apo(a). High plasma Lp(a) concentrations indicate an increased risk for CV diseases [14, 15]. The proatherogenic, prothrombotic, and proinflammatory effects of Lp(a) accelerate atherosclerotic plaque formation [15]. Furthermore, the serum Lp(a) concentrations increase significantly as the glomerular filtration rate declines. Patients on chronic dialysis therapy have higher Lp(a) levels than those without kidney failure [16]. Histologically, high plasma Lp(a) concentrations were found to be positively correlated with arterial Lp(a) content and atherosclerosis progression in patients with ESKD [17]. In a cohort study that focused on PD recipients, the upper tertile of Lp(a) levels had the highest CV mortality rate but not all-cause mortality [18].

Thus, this study aimed to assess the association between the serum Lp(a) levels and AS in ESKD individuals on regular PD using the CAVI.

2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Study Participants

This cross-sectional study was performed in a medical center in Hualian, Taiwan, and had been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Protection of Human Subjects (IRB108-219-A). From March 2020 to October 2021, a total of 86 participants were included who had been on PD for at least 3 months. Among these participants, 32 received continuous ambulatory PD, whereas the remaining 54 were on automated PD. Patients who were not able to offer informed consent or had an underlying malignancy, ongoing infection, heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, or limb amputation were excluded from the study.

Data on clearance and dialysis adequacy, including weekly and peritoneal fractional clearance index for urea (Kt/V), and total and peritoneal creatinine clearance were extracted from medical records. After the participants had rested for 10 min, the trained staff measured the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) three times using standard mercury sphygmomanometers with proper cuff sizes; the interval between each measurement was 5 minutes. HTN was defined as an SBP of 140 mmHg or higher, a DBP of 90 mmHg or higher, and/or the regular usage of antihypertensives over the past 2 weeks. Patients were diagnosed as having DM if the fasting plasma glucose level was 126 mg/dL or if they were taking regular oral antidiabetic drugs and/or insulin injections. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was defined by coronary angiography of more than 50% narrowing in any one of three epicardial coronary arteries.

2.2 Anthropometric Analyses

With each patient wearing airy clothes and standing without wearing shoes, their weights were measured to the closest half kilogram and heights to the nearest half centimeter. Body mass index (BMI) values were derived from weight/height2 (kg/m2).

2.3 Biochemical Investigations

A fasting (at least 8 h) blood specimen of 5 mL was obtained from each study participant before peritoneal dialysate exchange in the day. We obtained blood samples of approximately 0.5 mL to determine the blood cell count for each patient (Sysmex SP-1000i, Sysmex American, Mundelein, IL, USA). The remaining blood volumes were immediately centrifuged at 3000 ×g for 10 minutes. Within one hour of collection, the serum was set aside at 4 °C for further biochemical analyses.

Albumin, total cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting glucose, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, total calcium, phosphorus, and C-reactive protein (CRP) serum concentrations were determined by an autoanalyzer (Siemens Advia 1800, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Henkestr, Germany). Intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) (Catalog no. NM59041; IBL International, Hamburg, Germany) and Lp(a) (Catalog no. ab212165; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) levels were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

2.4 Measurement of Carotid Ankle Vascular Index

CAVI values were estimated using the waveform device (VaSera VS-1000, Fukuda Denshi Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), in accordance with previous recommendations [9, 19]. After the participants were kept in the supine position for 10 minutes, with continuous monitoring of the electrocardiogram and phonocardiogram, their blood pressure was measured in the arms and ankles. Then, the PWV and CAVI were calculated automatically. Patients with CAVI values of 9.0 belonged to the high CAVI group, whereas those with CAVI values of less than 9.0 were included in the normal CAVI group [20].

2.5 Statistical Analyses

Variables that were continuous were determined as normally distributed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Normally distributed continuous variables were represented as means ± standard deviations; for comparison between the two groups, the two-tailed independent Student’s t-test was employed. Variables with nonnormal distributions were displayed as median and interquartile ranges, with between-group comparisons using the Mann–Whitney U test. Data without normal distribution were logarithmically transformed before further linear regression analysis. Qualitative variables were shown as numbers (percentages) and analyzed by the χ2 test. Based on the results of multivariable logistic regression analysis, we could identify the potential risk factors for AS. To investigate the relationship between the clinical parameters and CAVI (left and right) and Lp(a), Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used. These data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A p-value less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

3. Results

The baseline parameters of the 86 patients undergoing PD are shown in Table 1. Major chronic medical illnesses included DM (n = 39; 45.3%) and HTN (n = 68; 79.1%). A total of 35 patients exhibited a high CAVI. Compared with the group with a normal CAVI, the patients with a higher CAVI had lower serum albumin concentrations (p = 0.026) and higher total cholesterol (p = 0.003), triglyceride (p = 0.044), CRP (p < 0.001), and Lp(a) (p < 0.001) levels. Blood hemoglobin and serum levels of fasting glucose, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, total calcium, phosphorus, iPTH, age, sex, BMI, blood pressure, total and dialysate clearance of solutes, smoking status, anti-DM drugs used, anti-HTN drugs used, and proportions of patients with underlying DM, HTN, and CAD did not differ significantly between the groups.

Table 1.Clinical variables for peritoneal dialysis patients with normal or high cardio-ankle vascular index scores.
Characteristic All participants (n = 86) Normal CAVI group (n = 51) High CAVI group (n = 35) p-value
Age (years) 58.56 ± 14.33 57.00 ± 15.65 60.83 ± 12.02 0.226
Peritoneal dialysis vintage (months) 48.54 (21.00–82.32) 54.24 (21.00–88.92) 34.44 (21.00–69.12) 0.257
Height (cm) 159.83 ± 8.63 158.33 ± 8.63 162.00 ± 8.25 0.052
Body weight (kg) 64.28 ± 13.41 64.62 ± 14.03 63.80 ± 12.64 0.783
Body mass index (kg/m2) 25.06 ± 4.32 25.65 ± 4.53 24.20 ± 3.90 0.129
Left CAVI 7.79 ± 2.52 6.34 ± 1.77 9.91 ± 1.87 <0.001*
Right CAVI 7.67 ± 2.36 6.25 ± 1.77 9.74 ± 1.37 <0.001*
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 145.77 ± 18.82 145.73 ± 19.65 145.83 ± 17.81 0.980
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 83.4 ± 10.42 83.96 ± 10.06 83.43 ± 11.05 0.817
Hemoglobin (gm/dL) 9.62 ± 1.43 9.57 ± 1.50 9.70 ± 1.33 0.678
Albumin (g/dL) 3.54 ± 0.35 3.61 ± 0.33 3.44 ± 0.35 0.026*
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 162.72 ± 43.17 151.29 ± 40.59 179.37 ± 41.89 0.003*
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 139.13 ± 77.52 125.20 ± 63.76 159.43 ± 91.27 0.044*
Fasting glucose (mg/dL) 104.00 (91.00–129.25) 105.00 (91.00–123.00) 103.00 (91.00–137.00) 0.778
Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL) 61.53 ± 22.40 60.49 ± 23.99 63.06 ± 20.08 0.604
Creatinine (mg/dL) 10.28 ± 3.31 10.46 ± 3.44 10.02 ± 3.16 0.545
Total calcium (mg/dL) 9.62 ± 0.62 9.60 ± 0.63 9.66 ± 0.61 0.645
Phosphorus (mg/dL) 5.22 ± 1.33 5.39 ± 1.36 4.97 ± 1.25 0.153
Intact parathyroid hormone (pg/mL) 184.35 (78.33–446.63) 190.00 (89.10–470.10) 150.90 (54.00–338.10) 0.345
C-reactive protein (mg/dL) 0.35 (0.14–0.99) 0.18 (0.11–0.60) 0.60 (0.31–1.11) <0.001*
Lipoprotein(a) (mg/L) 403.56 ± 187.38 278.58 ± 95.13 585.67 ± 129.99 <0.001*
Weekly Kt/V 1.97 (1.71–2.18) 1.95 (1.66–2.12) 2.00 (1.75–2.34) 0.166
Peritoneal Kt/V 1.78 (1.51–1.98) 1.77 (1.48–1.99) 1.78 (1.54–1.98) 0.492
Total clearance of creatinine (L/week) 58.64 ± 16.67 60.31 ± 15.31 56.22 ± 18.44 0.266
Peritoneal clearance of creatinine (L/week) 47.52 ± 12.30 49.47 ± 12.59 44.68 ± 11.45 0.075
Female, n (%) 50 (58.1) 31 (60.8) 19 (54.3) 0.548
Diabetes, n (%) 39 (45.3) 21 (41.2) 18 (51.4) 0.348
Hypertension, n (%) 68 (79.1) 39 (76.5) 29 (82.9) 0.474
CAPD model, n (%) 32 (37.2) 19 (37.3) 13 (37.1) 0.992
Smoking, n (%) 9 (10.5) 5 (9.8) 4 (11.4) 0.809
Coronary artery disease, n (%) 19 (22.1) 10 (19.6) 9 (25.7) 0.502
Calcium channel blockers, n (%) 45 (52.3) 27 (52.9) 18 (51.4) 0.891
Angiotensin receptor blockers, n (%) 46 (53.5) 28 (54.9) 18 (51.4) 0.753
Alpha-adrenergic blockers, n (%) 10 (11.6) 7 (13.7) 3 (8.6) 0.467
Beta-adrenergic blockers, n (%) 32 (37.2) 19 (37.3) 13 (37.1) 0.992
Aspirin, n (%) 10 (11.6) 5 (9.8) 5 (14.3) 0.527
Statins, n (%) 20 (23.3) 11 (21.6) 9 (25.7) 0.657
Fibrates, n (%) 6 (7.0) 4 (7.8) 2 (5.7) 0.705
Insulin, n (%) 12 (14.0) 7 (13.7) 5 (14.3) 0.947
Sulfonylureas, n (%) 7 (8.1) 3 (5.9) 4 (11.4) 0.355
Repaglinide, n (%) 11 (12.8) 6 (11.8) 5 (14.3) 0.731
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, n (%) 25 (29.1) 16 (31.4) 9 (25.7) 0.570

The continuous variable results are presented as mean ± standard deviation after being analyzed by Student’s t-test; variables that were not normally distributed are illustrated as median and interquartile range after analysis by the Mann-Whitney U test; values that are qualitative in nature are presented as number (%) and were assessed using the Chi-squared test. CAVI, cardio-ankle vascular index; weekly Kt/V, weekly fractional clearance index for urea; CAPD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. *p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the aspects independently correlated with AS and adjusted for albumin, total cholesterol, triglyceride, CRP, Lp(a), age, and gender. Lp(a) [odds ratio (OR) 1.025; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.010–1.040; p = 0.001], total cholesterol (OR 1.042; 95% CI 1.005–1.081; p = 0.027), and CRP (each increase 0.1 mg/dL, OR 1.217; 95% CI 1.008–1.469; p = 0.041) were the independent risk factors for AS development among the study patients (Table 2).

Table 2.Multivariable logistic regression analysis of the factors correlated to cardio-ankle vascular index in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.
Variables Odds ratio 95% Confidence interval p-value
Lipoprotein(a), 1 mg/L 1.025 1.010–1.040 0.001*
Total cholesterol, 1 mg/dL 1.042 1.005–1.081 0.027*
C-reactive protein, 0.1 mg/dL 1.217 1.008–1.469 0.041*
Albumin, 1 g/dL 0.068 0.001–3.949 0.195
Triglyceride, 1 mg/dL 1.004 0.988–1.020 0.654
Age, 1 year 1.019 0.926–1.122 0.699
Female 0.143 0.007–2.866 0.203

Analysis data were determined using the multivariable logistic regression analysis (adopted factors: albumin, total cholesterol, triglyceride, C-reactive protein, lipoprotein (a), age, and gender). *Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Table 3 represents the link between the baseline parameters and CAVI (left and right) as well as serum log-transformed Lp(a) (log-Lp(a)) levels by Spearman’s correlation analysis. Both the left and right CAVIs showed a significant and positive correlation with serum log-Lp(a) levels (r = 0.588, p < 0.001; r = 0.639, p < 0.001, respectively). Moreover, serum log-Lp(a) levels were positively associated with serum total cholesterol (r = 0.218, p = 0.043) and log-CRP (r = 0.270, p = 0.012) levels in addition to BMI (r = –0.243, p = 0.024). Both the left and right CAVIs had a significant positive correlation with serum log-CRP levels (r = 0.349, p = 0.001; r = 0.373, p < 0.001, respectively) and a negative correlation with serum albumin levels (r = –0.255, p = 0.018; r = –0.223, p = 0.039, respectively).

Table 3.Spearman correlation coefficients between left CAVI, right CAVI, lipoprotein(a), and clinical characteristics in patients on regular peritoneal dialysis therapy.
Variables Left CAVI Right CAVI Log-Lp(a) (mg/L)
Spearman’s coefficient of correlation p-value Spearman’s coefficient of correlation p-value Spearman’s coefficient of correlation p-value
Age (years) 0.109 0.320 0.182 0.093 0.163 0.133
Body mass index (kg/m2) –0.147 0.176 –0.167 0.123 –0.243 0.024*
Left CAVI 0.824 <0.001* 0.588 <0.001*
Right CAVI 0.824 <0.001* 0.639 <0.001*
Log-Lp(a) (mg/L) 0.588 <0.001* 0.639 <0.001*
Log-PD vintage (months) 0.050 0.645 0.072 0.507 –0.004 0.971
SBP (mmHg) –0.018 0.873 –0.033 0.763 –0.083 0.449
DBP (mmHg) –0.127 0.244 –0.152 0.163 –0.105 0.335
Hemoglobin (gm/dL) 0.039 0.724 0.073 0.504 0.065 0.554
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) 0.143 0.190 0.147 0.177 0.218 0.043*
Triglyceride (mg/dL) 0.139 0.201 0.162 0.136 0.181 0.096
BUN (mg/dL) –0.179 0.099 –0.078 0.474 –0.068 0.533
Creatinine (mg/dL) –0.139 0.200 –0.098 0.372 0.038 0.727
Log-glucose (mg/dL) 0.023 0.833 0.012 0.909 0.020 0.857
Albumin (g/dL) –0.255 0.018* –0.223 0.039* –0.202 0.062
Total calcium (mg/dL) 0.070 0.522 0.185 0.089 0.186 0.086
Phosphorus (mg/dL) –0.158 0.145 –0.210 0.052 –0.159 0.144
Log-iPTH (pg/mL) –0.119 0.276 –0.111 0.311 –0.057 0.601
Log-CRP (mg/dL) 0.349 0.001* 0.373 <0.001* 0.270 0.012*

Data for PD vintage, glucose, iPTH, CRP, and Lp(a) levels revealed a skewed distribution and were, therefore, log-transformed before any subsequent analyses. Data analysis was performed using Spearman’s correlation analysis method. CAVI, cardio-ankle vascular index; Lp(a), lipoprotein(a); PD, peritoneal dialysis; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; iPTH, intact parathyroid hormone; CRP, C-reactive protein. *Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

4. Discussion

The most important findings in the study were that the Lp(a), total cholesterol, and CRP serum concentrations were independently related to AS in patients undergoing chronic PD therapy. Both the left and right CAVIs are also positively associated with the serum log-Lp(a) levels. It is possible to use Lp(a) to predict adverse CV outcomes in these patients.

The pathophysiology of the Lp(a) contribution to the atherosclerotic process is complex. Several proposed mechanisms explain the contributing role of Lp(a) in atherogenesis, including direct Lp(a) deposition in arterial walls, increased foam cell transformation, and induction of endothelial dysfunction [15]. The apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) domain of Lp(a) shows homology to plasminogen; hence, Lp(a) interferes with the ability of plasminogen to facilitate fibrinolysis and promote thrombi formation [15, 21]. High serum Lp(a) levels were positively associated with platelet aggregation, which is an alternative explanation of the thrombogenic effect of Lp(a) [22, 23]. Lp(a) accelerates coagulation by promoting tissue factor expression and inhibiting the activity of the tissue factor pathway inhibitors [24, 25, 26]. Furthermore, Lp(a) has a proinflammatory role in atherosclerosis. Lp(a) and associated oxidized phospholipids upregulate proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor-α, increase the expression of adhesion molecules, and induce monocyte chemotaxis and migration [26, 27]. In summary, Lp(a) has several roles in atherosclerosis, including direct deposition in arterial walls, increased foam cell transformation, induction of endothelial dysfunction, and promotion of thrombi formation. It also promotes coagulation by promoting tissue factor expression and inhibiting the activity of the tissue factor pathway inhibitors. In this study, the serum log-Lp(a) levels in PD recipients were also positively associated with log-CRP levels.

Both Lp(a) and AS are important biomarkers of atherosclerosis and CV diseases. The association between Lp(a) and AS has been extensively studied. In a cross-sectional study that recruited hypertensive patients, AS was determined by measuring the carotid–femoral PWV and calculating the brachial augmentation index. The study concluded that logarithmically transformed Lp(a) and CRP were independently associated with an increased index but not with carotid–femoral PWV [28]. Furthermore, in older patients with DM, the positive correlation between serum Lp(a) and AS, determined by measuring the aortic PWV, was independent of age, sex, glycemic control, and the use of lipid-lowering medications [29]. In another small study, which included female participants, among the participants with hypertension, only oxidized Lp(a) concentrations, and not Lp(a) levels, were positively and independently correlated with the CAVI [30]. However, whether oxidized Lp(a) has a better predictive role in AS or adverse CV outcomes is still under investigation [31]. Moreover, the efficacy of Lp(a)-lowering therapy on CV endpoints is still not well established [32].

Cholesterol is an important constituent in atherosclerotic plaques; hyperlipidemia is a traditional CV risk factor. Establishing a positive association between hypercholesterolemia and AS was based on patients with familial hypercholesterolemia [33]. In a large prospective community-based study, total cholesterol concentrations were positively correlated with the brachial–ankle PWV and cholesterol could mediate hypertension through AS [34]. However, in a cohort study of older patients with hypertension, the total cholesterol levels did not correlate with large AS, when measured by aortic distensibility, increased index, and systemic arterial compliance [35]. On the contrary, serum triglyceride levels were significantly higher in the high CAVI group; however, triglycerides failed to independently predict AS in PD recipients. In a prospective community-based study, triglyceride levels were associated with AS independently of multiple CV risk factors and statin therapy [36].

The contributing role of malnutrition and inflammation in atherosclerosis is well-established [37]. The pathophysiology is characterized by the expression of adhesion molecules in endothelial cells, monocyte migration and penetration into vessel walls, macrophage transformation into foam cells, generation of proinflammatory cytokines and reactive oxygen species, activation of the coagulation cascade with a tendency of thrombus formation, and further activation of T lymphocytes [38, 39]. Moreover, CRP is not only a marker of inflammation but also participates in the progression of atherosclerosis and intravascular thrombosis [40]. Among PD recipients, higher CRP levels are an independent risk factor for the development of CV diseases, while high CRP levels were an independent predictor of the increased incidence of CV events [41, 42]. Several studies have found an association between CRP concentrations and AS, with the study participants including healthy and older individuals [43, 44]. PD recipients with protein-energy wasting have a reverse correlation between albumin levels and CRP, and IL-6 levels [45]. In addition, the aortic PWV is inversely correlated with albumin in PD recipients [46]. In this study, the left and right CAVIs were significantly and positively linked to the serum log-CRP levels and negatively linked to the serum albumin levels. Furthermore, serum CRP levels in patients undergoing chronic PD therapy, after adjusting for albumin, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and Lp(a), were independently associated with AS.

Previous investigations indicated that low Lp(a) levels could predict new-onset diabetes when the serum Lp(a) was inversely proportional to insulin concentrations and degree of insulin resistance [47, 48]. However, in the present study, we did not find any significant correlation between fasting plasma glucose or underlying DM and Lp(a) serum levels among patients undergoing PD.

As seen in Table 3, the serum calcium concentrations were slightly positively correlated with the right CAVI, whereas phosphorus concentrations were slightly negatively correlated, although neither reached statistical significance. There was no association between the iPTH and CAVI. Vascular calcifications are a critical component of chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). Previous studies revealed that higher serum calcium levels, as a higher iPTH, were positively linked to markers of vascular stiffening, such as PWV [49]. In another study on PD patients, hyperphosphatemia was found to independently predict the deterioration of coronary artery calcifications [50]. The mixed results explained the complexity of CKD-MBD; various factors such as fibroblast growth factor-23, vitamin D, and other promoters or inhibitors of vascular calcifications could also contribute to the process.

There are a few limitations in the current investigation. Firstly, there was a limited number of samples and the study was conducted in a single center. Secondly, the cross-sectional design limited the ability of the study to determine causal relationships between clinical variables and AS. Thirdly, we did not measure the serum oxidized Lp(a) concentrations in the study participants; however, whether oxidized Lp(a) has a better predictive value for AS than conventional Lp(a) needs further investigation.

5. Conclusions

In this study on patients with ESKD undergoing maintenance PD, along with serum total cholesterol and CRP levels, the most significant clinical implication was that serum Lp(a) levels were positively correlated to the CAVI and can be used as a potential novel biomarker of AS. Currently, whether higher Lp(a) concentrations adversely affect CV morbidity and long-term survival among these patients is unknown. Thus, further prospective studies with a longitudinal design are warranted to determine the causal role of Lp(a) on clinical outcome parameters.

Availability of Data and Materials

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

BGH, HJL, YLL, and CHW conceived and designed the experiments. HJL, YLL, and CHW performed the experiments. PYH, BGH, and JPT contributed reagents and analyzed the data. PYH, HJL, YLL, and CHW wrote the original draft preparation. BGH, and JPT review and editing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The research protocol was approved by the human research ethics committee of the Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation (approval ID: IRB108-219-A). Informed consent was obtained from the patient’s guardian(s). The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to all participating patients for their cooperation and willingness.

Funding

This research was funded by Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan, grant number TCRD-112-021 and TCMF-CP 110-02.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
Cozzolino M, Mangano M, Stucchi A, Ciceri P, Conte F, Galassi A. Cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation: Official Publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2018; 33: iii28–iii34.
[2]
García-López E, Carrero JJ, Suliman ME, Lindholm B, Stenvinkel P. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. 2007; 27: S205–S209.
[3]
Blacher J, Pannier B, Guerin AP, Marchais SJ, Safar ME, London GM. Carotid arterial stiffness as a predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in end-stage renal disease. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex.: 1979). 1998; 32: 570–574.
[4]
Sipahioglu MH, Kucuk H, Unal A, Kaya MG, Oguz F, Tokgoz B, et al. Impact of arterial stiffness on adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. Peritoneal Dialysis International: Journal of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis. 2012; 32: 73–80.
[5]
Lacolley P, Regnault V, Laurent S. Mechanisms of Arterial Stiffening: From Mechanotransduction to Epigenetics. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2020; 40: 1055–1062.
[6]
Palombo C, Kozakova M. Arterial stiffness, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk: Pathophysiologic mechanisms and emerging clinical indications. Vascular Pharmacology. 2016; 77: 1–7.
[7]
van Popele NM, Grobbee DE, Bots ML, Asmar R, Topouchian J, Reneman RS, et al. Association between arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis: the Rotterdam Study. Stroke. 2001; 32: 454–460.
[8]
Rico Martín S, Vassilenko V, de Nicolás Jiménez JM, Rey Sánchez P, Serrano A, Martínez Alvarez M, et al. Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) measured by a new device: protocol for a validation study. BMJ Open. 2020; 10: e038581.
[9]
Shirai K, Hiruta N, Song M, Kurosu T, Suzuki J, Tomaru T, et al. Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) as a novel indicator of arterial stiffness: theory, evidence and perspectives. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis. 2011; 18: 924–938.
[10]
Miyoshi T, Ito H. Arterial stiffness in health and disease: The role of cardio-ankle vascular index. Journal of Cardiology. 2021; 78: 493–501.
[11]
Tsai JP, Lai YH, Wang CH, Hsu BG, Fang TC. Clinical correlates of arterial stiffness assessed by the cardio-ankle vascular index in peritoneal dialysis patients. Tzu Chi Medical Journal. 2011; 23: 73–76.
[12]
Ueyama K, Miyata M, Kubozono T, Nagaki A, Hamasaki S, Ueyama S, et al. Noninvasive indices of arterial stiffness in hemodialysis patients. Hypertension Research: Official Journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. 2009; 32: 716–720.
[13]
Murakami K, Inayama E, Itoh Y, Tuchiya S, Iwasaki M, Tamura N, et al. The Role of Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index as a Predictor of Mortality in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis. Vascular Health and Risk Management. 2021; 17: 791–798.
[14]
Kostner KM, März W, Kostner GM. When should we measure lipoprotein (a)? European Heart Journal. 2013; 34: 3268–3276.
[15]
Rehberger Likozar A, Zavrtanik M, Šebeštjen M. Lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerosis: from pathophysiology to clinical relevance and treatment options. Annals of Medicine. 2020; 52: 162–177.
[16]
Hopewell JC, Haynes R, Baigent C. The role of lipoprotein (a) in chronic kidney disease. Journal of Lipid Research. 2018; 59: 577–585.
[17]
Ma KL, Gong TK, Hu ZB, Zhang Y, Wang GH, Liu L, et al. Lipoprotein(a) accelerated the progression of atherosclerosis in patients with end-stage renal disease. BMC Nephrology. 2018; 19: 192.
[18]
Zhong Z, Peng F, Shi D, Peng Y, Li B, Xiao M, et al. Serum lipoprotein(a) and risk of mortality in patients on peritoneal dialysis. Journal of Clinical Lipidology. 2020; 14: 252–259.
[19]
Lee CJ, Wang JH, Chen ML, Yang CF, Chen YC, Hsu BG. Serum osteoprotegerin is associated with arterial stiffness assessed according to the cardio-ankle vascular index in hypertensive patients. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis. 2015; 22: 304–312.
[20]
Miyoshi T, Ito H. Assessment of Arterial Stiffness Using the Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index. Pulse (Basel, Switzerland). 2016; 4: 11–23.
[21]
Reyes-Soffer G, Ginsberg HN, Berglund L, Duell PB, Heffron SP, Kamstrup PR, et al. Lipoprotein(a): A Genetically Determined, Causal, and Prevalent Risk Factor for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2022; 42: e48–e60.
[22]
Liu H, Fu D, Luo Y, Peng D. Independent association of Lp(a) with platelet reactivity in subjects without statins or antiplatelet agents. Scientific Reports. 2022; 12: 16609.
[23]
Zhu P, Tang XF, Song Y, Zhang Y, Gao LJ, Gao Z, et al. Association of lipoprotein(a) with platelet aggregation and thrombogenicity in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Platelets. 2021; 32: 684–689.
[24]
Caplice NM, Panetta C, Peterson TE, Kleppe LS, Mueske CS, Kostner GM, et al. Lipoprotein (a) binds and inactivates tissue factor pathway inhibitor: a novel link between lipoproteins and thrombosis. Blood. 2001; 98: 2980–2987.
[25]
Di Nisio M, ten Wolde M, Meijers JC, Buller HR. Effects of high plasma lipoprotein (a) levels on tissue factor pathway inhibitor and the protein C pathway. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis: JTH. 2005; 3: 2123–2125.
[26]
Ugovšek S, Šebeštjen M. Lipoprotein(a)-The Crossroads of Atherosclerosis, Atherothrombosis and Inflammation. Biomolecules. 2021; 12: 26.
[27]
Dzobo KE, Kraaijenhof JM, Stroes ESG, Nurmohamed NS, Kroon J. Lipoprotein(a): An underestimated inflammatory mastermind. Atherosclerosis. 2022; 349: 101–109.
[28]
Brosolo G, Da Porto A, Bulfone L, Vacca A, Bertin N, Colussi G, et al. Plasma Lipoprotein(a) Levels as Determinants of Arterial Stiffening in Hypertension. Biomedicines. 2021; 9: 1510.
[29]
Wakabayashi I, Masuda H. Lipoprotein (a) as a determinant of arterial stiffness in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry. 2006; 373: 127–131.
[30]
Kotani K, Yamada S, Yamada T, Kario K, Taniguchi N. Oxidized lipoprotein(a) and cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) in hypertensive subjects. Heart and Vessels. 2013; 28: 461–466.
[31]
Sorokin A, Kotani K. Lipoprotein(a) and Arterial Stiffness Parameters. Pulse (Basel, Switzerland). 2015; 3: 148–152.
[32]
Korneva VA, Kuznetsova TY, Julius U. Modern Approaches to Lower Lipoprotein(a) Concentrations and Consequences for Cardiovascular Diseases. Biomedicines. 2021; 9: 1271.
[33]
Wilkinson I, Cockcroft JR. Cholesterol, lipids and arterial stiffness. Advances in Cardiology. 2007; 44: 261–277.
[34]
Chen H, Chen Y, Wu W, Cai Z, Chen Z, Yan X, et al. Total cholesterol, arterial stiffness, and systolic blood pressure: a mediation analysis. Scientific Reports. 2021; 11: 1330.
[35]
Dart AM, Gatzka CD, Cameron JD, Kingwell BA, Liang YL, Berry KL, et al. Large artery stiffness is not related to plasma cholesterol in older subjects with hypertension. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2004; 24: 962–968.
[36]
Pavlovska I, Kunzova S, Jakubik J, Hruskova J, Skladana M, Rivas-Serna IM, et al. Associations between high triglycerides and arterial stiffness in a population-based sample: Kardiovize Brno 2030 study. Lipids in Health and Disease. 2020; 19: 170.
[37]
Graterol Torres F, Molina M, Soler-Majoral J, Romero-González G, Rodríguez Chitiva N, Troya-Saborido M, et al. Evolving Concepts on Inflammatory Biomarkers and Malnutrition in Chronic Kidney Disease. Nutrients. 2022; 14: 4297.
[38]
Hansson GK, Robertson AKL, Söderberg-Nauclér C. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Annual Review of Pathology. 2006; 1: 297–329.
[39]
Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1135–1143.
[40]
Badimon L, Peña E, Arderiu G, Padró T, Slevin M, Vilahur G, et al. C-Reactive Protein in Atherothrombosis and Angiogenesis. Frontiers in Immunology. 2018; 9: 430.
[41]
Ducloux D, Bresson-Vautrin C, Kribs M, Abdelfatah A, Chalopin JM. C-reactive protein and cardiovascular disease in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney International. 2002; 62: 1417–1422.
[42]
Neves M, Machado S, Rodrigues L, Borges A, Maia P, Campos M, et al. Cardiovascular risk in peritoneal dialysis - a Portuguese multicenter study. Nefrologia: Publicacion Oficial De La Sociedad Espanola Nefrologia. 2014; 34: 205–211.
[43]
Mattace-Raso FUS, van der Cammen TJM, van der Meer IM, Schalekamp MADH, Asmar R, Hofman A, et al. C-reactive protein and arterial stiffness in older adults: the Rotterdam Study. Atherosclerosis. 2004; 176: 111–116.
[44]
Yasmin, McEniery CM, Wallace S, Mackenzie IS, Cockcroft JR, Wilkinson IB. C-reactive protein is associated with arterial stiffness in apparently healthy individuals. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2004; 24: 969–974.
[45]
Snaedal S, Qureshi AR, Lund SH, Germanis G, Hylander B, Heimbürger O, et al. Dialysis modality and nutritional status are associated with variability of inflammatory markers. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation: Official Publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2016; 31: 1320–1327.
[46]
Jung JY, Hwang YH, Lee SW, Lee H, Kim DK, Kim S, et al. Factors associated with aortic stiffness and its change over time in peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation: Official Publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2010; 25: 4041–4048.
[47]
Mora S, Kamstrup PR, Rifai N, Nordestgaard BG, Buring JE, Ridker PM. Lipoprotein(a) and risk of type 2 diabetes. Clinical Chemistry. 2010; 56: 1252–1260.
[48]
Ding L, Song A, Dai M, Xu M, Sun W, Xu B, et al. Serum lipoprotein (a) concentrations are inversely associated with T2D, prediabetes, and insulin resistance in a middle-aged and elderly Chinese population. Journal of Lipid Research. 2015; 56: 920–926.
[49]
Vervloet MG. Can we reverse arterial stiffness by intervening on CKD-MBD biomarkers? Clinical Kidney Journal. 2023; sfad112.
[50]
Shang D, Xie Q, Ge X, Yan H, Tian J, Kuang D, et al. Hyperphosphatemia as an independent risk factor for coronary artery calcification progression in peritoneal dialysis patients. BMC Nephrology. 2015; 16: 107.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share
Back to top