IMR Press / RCM / Volume 23 / Issue 7 / DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2307249
Open Access Original Research
Influence of the Single Coronary Vessel on Acute Outcomes of In-Stent CTO Recanalization
Show Less
1 Department of Cardiology and Rhythmology, Petrus Hospital, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany
2 Faculty of Health, University Witten/Herdecke, 58455 Witten, Germany
3 Department of Cardiology, Helios Clinic, 47805 Krefeld, Germany
4 Department of Cardiology, Johanna Etienne Hospital, 41462 Neuss, Germany
*Correspondence: janguelker14@gmail.com (Jan-Erik Guelker)
These authors contributed equally.
Academic Editors: George Dangas and Christian Hengstenberg
Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 23(7), 249; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2307249
Submitted: 7 April 2022 | Revised: 5 May 2022 | Accepted: 26 May 2022 | Published: 29 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Objective: Recanalization of in-stent chronic total occlusion (IS-CTO) is challenging and has resulted in inconsistent results. The aim of our study was to analyze the influence of the individual coronary vessels on the acute outcomes following IS-CTO PCI. Methods: This was an observational retrospective study, including 66 patients undergoing recanalization of a CTO. The CTO interventions were performed bi-femoral using 7-French guiding catheters. A composite endpoint summarizing severe complications was evaluated, including emergency coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) and cardiac death. Results: We subdivided our cohort into three groups (LAD group, LCX group, RCA group). The retrograde technique and the utilization of an extension catheter were used more frequently in patients with a RCA IS-CTO. There was no significant difference between the composite safety endpoints amongst the three groups. Technical success was independent of the involved vessel. Conclusions: Success and complication rates are independent of the occluded vessel. This challenging and complex coronary intervention is feasible and can be carried out in complete safety.

Keywords
in-stent chronic total occlusion
percutaneous coronary intervention
single coronary artery
acute outcome
1. Introduction

In interventional cardiology recanalization of chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains a complex procedure. A CTO of a coronary artery can be identified in up to 18% of patients undergoing coronary angiography [1]. Due to novel recanalization strategies and emerging devices, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become a promising treatment option [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. CTO revascularization has been shown to be a predictor for the prevention of cardiac death [8].

Particularly PCI of in-stent occlusions (IS-CTO) is extremely demanding, and studies have shown inconsistent results regarding outcomes and complications [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. There is little data in the literature on outcomes amongst the three individual major coronary artery branches. IS-CTO is defined as a >50% stenosis of a previously stented segment.

In this study we want to analyze the influence of the individual coronary vessels on the acute outcomes following IS-CTO PCI.

2. Methods

Our study is an observational study. 66 patients who underwent IS-CTO PCI between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively included. The indication for CTO-PCI was based on the presence of clinically symptoms including typical angina pectoris or dyspnea [16, 17, 18].

The complex interventions were performed bi-femoral using 7-French guiding catheters. After initial contralateral contrast injections, the length of the CTO lesion and the existence and extent of collateral vessels was carefully analyzed. Antegrade and retrograde recanalization techniques were used. Heparin was administered during CTO-PCI guided by measurements of the activated clotting time (>300 sec.).

After a successful recanalization a dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin and clopidogrel for at least 6 months was instituted. The primary endpoint was technical success, defined as a successful recanalization of the CTO with a residual stenosis less than 30% and restoration of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI)-flow grade 3.

A composite endpoint was evaluated including acute cardiac death, vascular and bleeding complications, coronary perforation, which necessitated treatment by pericardial puncture, peri-interventional myocardial infarction (MI) which was defined as an increase in cardiac troponin blood levels in a patient who also exhibits signs or symptoms of MI, stroke and emergency coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) [19, 20].

3. Statistical Analysis

The distribution of continuous variables was characterized by mean ± standard deviation, or median with interquartile ranges (25th to 75th percentiles), as well as ranges (minimum to maximum), and the distribution of categorical variables by absolute and relative frequencies. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test for normality of the data. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used without testing normality because of the small sample size. Fisher’s exact test was used to test the differences in the distributions of categorical variables. According to the exploratory character of the analysis all p values were interpreted as descriptive measures rather than as definitive inferential measures. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, p < 0.10 was considered as a statistical trend.

4. Results

66 patients were included and subdivided into three groups (LAD group, LCX group, RCA group). 47 (72.2%) patients suffered from a RCA IS-CTO, 11 (16.7%) from a LAD IS-CTO and 8 (12.1%) from a LCX IS-CTO.

Table 1 shows the baseline clinical characteristics. The majority of the patients were male (87.9%) and 34.8% were older than 65 years of age. Patients in the LAD group had a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (LAD group: 45.5%, LCX group: 25.0%, RCA group: 17.0%, p value: 0.147). Other cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking habits, increased cholesterol values, and a family history of coronary artery disease (CAD), were distributed equally amongst the groups. Hypertension was present in 90.9% of the LAD group, 62.5% in the LCX group and 68.1% in the RCA group (p value: 0.292). Patients in the LCX group had a higher incidence of prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery (LAD group: 18.2%, LCX group: 37.5%, RCA group: 10.6%, p value: 0.115). Fewer patients in the LAD group had a prior CTO PCI attempt (LAD group: 36.4%, LCX group: 75.0%, RCA group: 72.3%, p value: 0.079). Almost all patients in each group had an ejection fraction (EF) greater than 40% (LAD group: 100%, LCX group: 100%, RCA group: 97.9%, p value: 1).

Table 1.Baseline characteristics.
LAD LCX RCA p-value*
(n = 11) (n = 8) (n = 47)
Age >65 years 2 (18.2%) 3 (37.5%) 18 (38.3%) 0.503
Male sex 10 (90.9%) 7 (87.5%) 41 (87.2%) 1.000
Diabetes 5 (45.5%) 2 (25.0%) 8 (17.0%) 0.147
COPD 0 (0.0%) 1 (12.5%) 2 (4.3%) 0.386
Smoking 3 (27.3%) 5 (62.5%) 21 (44.7%) 0.304
PAD 1 (9.1%) 1 (12.5%) 8 (17.0%) 1.000
Hypertension 10 (90.9%) 5 (62.5%) 32 (68.1%) 0.292
Family history for CAD 1 (9.1%) 1 (12.5%) 13 (27.7%) 0.375
Prior MI 7 (63.6%) 2 (25.0%) 16 (34.0%) 0.142
Prior CABG 2 (18.2%) 3 (37.5%) 5 (10.6%) 0.115
Prior CTO PCI attempt 4 (36.4%) 6 (75.0%) 34 (72.3%) 0.079
Prior PCI 9 (81.8%) 6 (75.0%) 32 (68.1%) 0.759
EF 40% 11 (100.0%) 8 (100.0%) 46 (97.9%) 1.000
Cholesterol >200 mg/dL 0 (0.0%) 2 (28.6%) 9 (24.3%) 0.538
HDL Cholesterol >40 mg/dL 5 (71.4%) 8 (100.0%) 25 (67.6%) 0.306
LDL Cholesterol >100 mg/dL 3 (42.9%) 4 (57.1%) 16 (43.2%) 0.901
*Fisher’s exact test; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CAD, coronary artery disease; COPD, chronical obstructive pulmonary disease; CTO, chronic total occlusion; EF, Ejection fraction; HDL, high density cholesterol; LAD, left anterior descending; LCX, left circumflex; LDL, low density lipoprotein; MI, myocardial infarction; PAD, peripheral artery disease; PCI, percutaneous coronary; RCA, right coronary artery.

Table 2 summarizes the angiographic parameters and peri-procedural characteristics.

Table 2.Procedural and angiographic characteristics.
LAD LCX RCA p-value*
(n = 11) (n = 8) (n = 47)
Coronary artery disease 0.392
1 vessel 2 (18.2%) 2 (25.0%) 9 (19.1%)
2 vessel 4 (36.4%) 3 (37.5%) 24 (51.1%)
3 vessel 5 (45.5%) 3 (37.5%) 14 (29.8%)
Blunt Stump 5 (45.5%) 7 (87.5%) 30 (63.8%) 0.180
Calcification 9 (81.8%) 6 (75.0%) 33 (70.2%) 0.905
Bending >90° 5 (45.5%) 2 (25.0%) 30 (63.8%) 0.089
J-CTO Score >3 5 (45.5%) 4 (50.0%) 25 (53.2%) 0.926
Retrograde technique 2 (18.2%) 0 (0.0%) 16 (34.0%) 0.101
Use of an extension catheter 1 (9.1%) 0 (0.0%) 29 (61.7%) 0.041
Use of IVUS 9 (81.8%) 6 (75.0%) 35 (74.5%) 0.926
Length of lesion** 40 mm (10–60) 25 mm (15–70) 40 mm (15–80) 0.182
Fluoroscopy time** 43 min (12–48) 31 min (12–65) 42 min (11–97) 0.407
Examination time** 110 min (50–150) 85 min (45–115) 120 min (35–240) 0.141
Amount of contrast medium** 300 mL (100–500) 210 mL (100–450) 250 mL (120–630) 0.555
Number of stents** 3 (1–5) 2 (1–3) 2 (1–4) 0.364
Diameter of stents** 3.0 mm (2.5–3.5) 3.0 mm (2.75–3.5) 3.5 mm (2.5–4.0) 0.037
Length of stent** 66 mm (30–120) 46 mm (23–69) 66 mm (18–132) 0.212
Complication rate 0 (0.0%) 1 (12.5%) 1 (2.1%) 0.255
Technical success rate 11 (100.0%) 7 (87.5%) 40 (85.1%) 0.495
*Fisher’s exact test; **median (min-max); IVUS, Intravascular ultrasound; J-CTO, japanese chronic total occlusion; LAD, left anterior descending; LCX, left circumflex; RCA, right coronary artery.

The J-CTO score, including the degree of calcification of the occlusion, bending over 90° in the occluded segment, a blunt stump morphology, the length of the occluded segment longer than 20 mm and a previously failed recanalization attempt, was comparable in all groups; however, the bending of the vessel was more frequent in the RCA group (Fig. 1). The retrograde technique was used more frequently in patients with a RCA IS-CTO (LAD group: 18.2%, LCX group: 0.0%, RCA group: 34.0%, p value: 0.10). The use of a GuideLiner (Vascular Solutions Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was used more frequently in the RCA group and the diameter of the implanted stents were larger in these patients (LAD group: 3.0 mm, LCX: 3.0 mm, RCA: 3.5 mm, p value: 0.037).

Fig. 1.

Distribution of the J-CTO, blunt stump morphology, vessel calcification and vessel bending.

The number of stents (LAD group: 3, LCX group: 2, RCA group: 2, p value: 0.364) and the length of stents (LAD group: 66 mm, LCX group: 46 mm, RCA group: 66 mm, p value: 0.212) were similar amongst the groups.

Technical success was independent of the involved vessel (LAD group: 100%, LCX group: 87.5%, RCA: 85.1%).

Acute procedural complications derived from the composite endpoint were rare and showed no significant difference between the groups (LAD group: 0.0%, LCX group: 12.5%, RCA group: 2.1%, p value: 0.255). They included mostly vascular complications such as a local hematoma at the puncture site and could be treated without further consequences. No severe complications such as peri-procedural death, stroke or MI occurred (Table 3).

Table 3.In-hospital clinical events.
LAD LCX RCA p-value*
(n = 11) (n = 8) (n = 47)
In-hospital death 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1.000
Hamatoma 0 (0.0%) 1 (12.5%) 1 (2.1%) 0.255
Stroke 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1.000
Perforation 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1.000
*Fisher’s exact test; LAD, left anterior descending; LCX, left circumflex; RCA, right coronary artery.
5. Discussion

Several studies have reported the challenges involved in IS-CTO recanalization. A large registry could demonstrate the incidence of a IS-CTO PCI was 11% [21]. Mir et al. [10] emphasized that PCI for IS-CTO was associated with higher odds of MACE and MI compared to PCI for de-novo CTO. Data by Guan et al. [22] stressed that effectiveness and safety of this complex procedure are reasonable, but the risk of cardiac death and MI is higher among patients with IS-CTO. In another study including 81 patients, Gao et al. [23] added that patients with IS-CTO had worse Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores concerning anginal stabilities than the patients with de novo CTO.

Karmpaliotis et al. [24] provided some reasons for the difficulties to recanalize IS-CTO which may explain the on-going challenges involved with this complex procedure. It was particularly emphasized that the previous use of under-expanded stents is one key problem. This leads to the problem that the wire may enter the subintimal space. Furthermore, a possible stent fracture may complicate the wiring even with stiff wires. This is even more complex in tortuous vessels which are often associated with hard fibrous tissue and high calcium content [24]. In contrast to data from Azzalini et al. [13], we experienced many In-Stent CTO in the RCA.

This present study emphasizes three important findings:

First, the retrograde technique was used more frequently in patients with a RCA IS-CTO. We know that the retrograde approach, when used by experienced operators who have been well trained, can produce higher retrograde success in complex CTO lesions [25]. Surmely et al. [26] proposed that septal collaterals of the LAD can be used as an optimal access for the retrograde approach in RCA-CTO revascularization.

Second, the bending of the vessel was more frequent in the RCA group. That is consistent with the fact that the use of an extension catheter, such as the GuideLiner, was more frequently required. Several studies have proposed that a mother-and-child catheter is a simple, safe and efficacious adjunctive device for complex CTO recanalization when despite standard measures, it is not possible to deliver an initial balloon or microcatheter across the occluded segment [27, 28, 29, 30]. It helps to avoid implantation of under-expanded stents which contributes to in-stent occlusion. Furthermore, information about the amount of neointimal or peri-stent calcium, and multiple old stent strut layers are important determinants of new stent under expansion which is associated with adverse long-term outcomes [31].

Third, we demonstrated that the technical success and complication rate in IS-CTO PCI is independent of the target vessel. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to document that there is no influence of the target vessel on the success of this complex and challenging intervention.

6. Study Limitations

Our study has some limitations. First, the study is an observational retrospective analysis and all the data was collected from one single center. Second, our study only reported in-hospital outcomes without a follow-up. Third, no data was available on the type of stent used in this cohort. Fourth, there was no clinical event adjudication by a clinical events committee. Fifth, all procedures were performed at one experienced PCI center, thus limiting the generalizability of our findings to centers with limited experience. Sixth, our cohort included only 66 patients.

7. Conclusions

Recanalization of in-stent CTO lesions is a challenging procedure in interventional cardiology. Success and complication rates are independent of the occluded vessel. Recanalization is safe and feasible when performed safely in experienced hands.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization—JG; Methodology—JG and CB; Validation—CB and EK; Formal analysis—JG and KI; Data curation—EK and CB; Writing-review and editing—JG and JK; Writing-original draft preparation—JG and CB; Supervision—AB; Project administration—JG and AB.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol and all data were obtained from 66 patients who underwent IS-CTO PCI between 2012 and 2021 were retrospectively included, were approved by the Ethics Committee of Ärztekammer Nord-Rhein (approval number: 26/2022). We confirm that copyright permissions have been obtained.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References
[1]
Azzalini L, Jolicoeur EM, Pighi M, Millán X, Picard F, Tadros V, et al. Epidemiology, Management Strategies, and Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2016; 118: 1128–1135.
[2]
Fefer P, Knudtson ML, Cheema AN, Galbraith PD, Osherov AB, Yalonetsky S, et al. Current Perspectives on Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions. The Canadian Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusions Registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012; 59: 991–997.
[3]
Tomasello SD, Boukhris M, Giubilato S, Marzà F, Garbo R, Contegiacomo G, et al. Management strategies in patients affected by chronic total occlusions: results from the Italian Registry of Chronic Total Occlusions. European Heart Journal. 2015; 36: 3189–3198.
[4]
Bufe A, Haltern G, Dinh W, Wolfertz J, Schleiting H, Guelker H. Recanalisation of coronary chronic total occlusions with new techniques including the retrograde approach via collaterals. Netherlands Heart Journal. 2011; 19: 162–167.
[5]
Galassi AR, Tomasello SD, Reifart N, Werner GS, Sianos G, Bonnier H, et al. In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic total occlusion: insights from the ERCTO (European Registry of Chronic Total Occlusion) registry. EuroIntervention. 2011; 7: 472–477.
[6]
Christopoulos G, Menon RV, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, Lombardi W, Grantham A, et al. The efficacy and safety of the “hybrid” approach to coronary chronic total occlusions: insights from a contemporary multicenter US registry and comparison with prior studies. The Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2014; 26: 427–432.
[7]
Galassi AR, Sianos G, Werner GS, Escaned J, Tomasello SD, Boukhris M, et al. Retrograde recanalization of chronic total occlusions in Europe: procedural, in-hospital, and long-term outcomes from the multicenter ERCTO registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2015; 65: 2388–2400.
[8]
Gong X, Zhou L, Ding X, Chen H, Li H. The impact of successful chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term clinical outcomes in real world. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2021; 21: 182.
[9]
Werner GS, Moehlis H, Tischer K. Management of total restenotic occlusions. EuroIntervention. 2009; 5; D79–D83.
[10]
Mir T, Ullah W, Sattar Y, Al-Khadra Y, Darmoch F, Pacha HM, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous intervention in in-stent versus de-novo chronic total occlusion: a meta-analysis. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy. 2020; 18: 827–833.
[11]
Lamelas P, Padilla L, Abud M, Cigalini I, Vaca I, Ordoñez S, et al. In-stent chronic total occlusion angioplasty in the LATAM-CTO registry. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2021; 97: E34–E39.
[12]
Vemmou E, Quadros AS, Dens JA, Rafeh NA, Agostoni P, Alaswad K, et al. In-Stent CTO Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2021; 14: 1308–1319.
[13]
Azzalini L, Dautov R, Ojeda S, Benincasa S, Bellini B, Giannini F, et al. Procedural and Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for in-Stent Chronic Total Occlusion. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2017; 10: 892–902.
[14]
Rinfret S, Ribeiro HB, Nguyen CM, Nombela-Franco L, Ureña M, Rodés-Cabau J. Dissection and re-Entry Techniques and Longer-Term Outcomes Following Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Chronic Total Occlusion. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2014; 114: 1354–1360.
[15]
Werner GS, Martin-Yuste V, Hildick-Smith D, Boudou N, Sianos G, Gelev V, et al. A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions. European Heart Journal. 2018; 39: 2484–2493.
[16]
Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, et al. ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). European Heart Journal. 2014; 35: 2541–2619.
[17]
Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation. 2011; 124: e574–e651.
[18]
Azzalini L, Torregrossa G, Puskas JD, Brilakis ES, Lombardi WL, Karmpaliotis D, et al. Percutaneous revascularization of chronic total occlusions: Rationale, indications, techniques, and the cardiac surgeon’s point of view. International Journal of Cardiology. 2017; 231: 90–96.
[19]
Guelker J, Kinoshita Y, Weber-Albers J, Bufe A, Blockhaus C, Mashayekhi K. Validation of the newly introduced CASTLE Score for predicting successful CTO recanalization. IJC Heart and Vasculature. 2022; 38: 100942.
[20]
Guelker JE, Blockhaus C, Bufe A, Kroeger K, Kürvers J, Ilousis D, et al. In-hospital outcome of re-attempted percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusion. Cardiology Journal. 2021. (in press)
[21]
Christopoulos G, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, Lombardi WL, Grantham JA, Rangan BV, et al. The efficacy of “hybrid” percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic total occlusions caused by in-stent restenosis: Insights from a US multicenter registry. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014; 84: 646–651.
[22]
Guan H, Yang ZX, Guan CD, Zhao GY, Cui JG, Hu FH, et al. Five-year clinical outcomes of patients with in-stent chronic total occlusion undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2021; 49: 770–775. (In Chinese)
[23]
Gao K, Li B, Zhang M, Rong J, Yang L, Fan L, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients with in-Stent Chronic Total Occlusion Versus De Novo Chronic Total Occlusion. Angiology. 2021; 72: 740–748.
[24]
Karmpaliotis D, Hatem R. In-Stent CTO, not as Easy as it Looks. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2017; 10: 903–905.
[25]
Wu EB, Tsuchikane E, Ge L, Harding SA, Lo S, Lim ST, et al. Retrograde Versus Antegrade Approach for Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion in an Algorithm-Driven Contemporary Asia-Pacific Multicentre Registry: Comparison of Outcomes. Heart, Lung & Circulation. 2020; 29: 894–903.
[26]
Surmely J, Katoh O, Tsuchikane E, Nasu K, Suzuki T. Coronary septal collaterals as an access for the retrograde approach in the percutaneous treatment of coronary chronic total occlusions. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2007; 69: 826–832.
[27]
Kovacic JC, Sharma AB, Roy S, Li JR, Narayan R, Kim DB, et al. GuideLiner mother-and-child guide catheter extension: a simple adjunctive tool in PCI for balloon uncrossable chronic total occlusions. Journal of Interventional Cardiology. 2013; 26: 343–350
[28]
Chan PH, Alegria-Barrero E, Foin N, Paulo M, Lindsay AC, Viceconte N, et al. Extended use of the GuideLiner in complex coronary interventions. EuroIntervention. 2015; 11: 325–335.
[29]
Guelker J, Blockhaus C, Kroeger K, Wehner R, Klues H, Bufe A. The GuideLiner catheter: a supportive tool in percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion. Journal of the Saudi Heart Association. 2018; 30: 69–74.
[30]
Mozid AM, Davies JR, Spratt JC. The utility of a guideliner™ catheter in retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention of a chronic total occlusion with reverse cart-the “capture” technique. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014; 83: 929–932.
[31]
Yin D, Mintz GS, Song L, Chen Z, Lee T, Kirtane AJ, et al. In-stent restenosis characteristics and repeat stenting underexpansion: insights from optical coherence tomography. EuroIntervention. 2020; 16: e335–e343.
Share
Back to top