Academic Editors: Kazuhiro P. Izawa and Peter H. Brubaker
Background: Following cardiovascular surgery, patients are at high risk of
requiring systemic management in the intensive care unit (ICU), resulting in
hospitalization-associated disability (HAD). Predicting the risk of HAD during
the postoperative course is important to prevent susceptibility to cardiovascular
events. Assessment of physical function during the ICU stay may be useful as a
prediction index but has not been established. Methods: This prospective
observational study conducted at a high-volume cardiovascular center included 236
patients (34% female; median age, 73 years) who required an ICU stay of at least
72 hours after surgery and underwent postoperative rehabilitation. HAD was
defined as a decrease in the discharge Barthel index (BI) score of at least 5
points relative to the preadmission BI score. Physical Function ICU Test-scored
(PFIT-s), Functional Status Score for the ICU (FSS-ICU), and Medical Research
Council (MRC)-sumscore were used to assess physical function at ICU discharge.
Results: HAD occurred in 58 (24.6%) of the 236 patients following cardiovascular
surgery. The cut-off points for HAD were 7.5 points for the PFIT-s (sensitivity
0.80, specificity 0.59), 24.5 points for the FSS-ICU (sensitivity 0.57,
specificity 0.66), and 59.5 points for the MRC-sumscore (sensitivity 0.93,
specificity 0.66). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a PFIT-s of
The development of surgical techniques and advancements in perioperative management for cardiovascular surgery have enabled an improvement in life saving, a shortening of the postoperative hospital stay, and the start of early rehabilitation. The improved surgical techniques also enabled us to offer surgical options to older adults aged over 80 years and who had comorbidity. With the advancement of medical technology, the number of patients indicated for surgery is expanding [1].
The procedure’s success rate and survival rate after surgery have been improving in older adult population. However, hospitalization-associated disability (HAD), such as increased catabolism due to invasion and postoperative bed rest, which leads to a decrease in physical function and activities of daily living (ADL) associated with inpatient postoperative care, has begun to be recognized as an important postoperative outcome [2]. The prevalence of HAD in older adults after surgery has been reported to be as high as 30% [3], and this group had an increased risk of poor post-discharge quality of life (QOL) and long-term life outcomes [4, 5].
HAD is related to age, cognitive function, and other environmental changes due to preoperative background and surgical procedure [6]. In addition to these factors, advanced invasion, such as the use of cardiopulmonary prostheses and long-term intensive care unit (ICU) care, increases the risk of HAD in patients after cardiovascular surgery. Compared to preoperative factors, postoperative factors and course in the ICU in patients after surgery may have a direct influence on their subsequent functional prognosis. Therefore, assessing patients’ physical condition after surgery at the ICU before discharge could be very important in developing therapeutic strategies to prevent HAD.
In recent years, several methodologies for evaluating physical function in the ICU have been reported [7]. Due to highly variable clinical characteristics such as acute disease state and specific environment, a method for estimating the risk of HAD after cardiac surgery has not yet been established. Therefore, a reliable means to accurately assess physical function in the ICU and thus predict the HAD index is required. Physical function assessment at ICU discharge can be a useful indicator for reconstructing rehabilitation programs after ICU discharge and designing an individual home care plan following discharge.
Here, we aimed to investigate the postoperative and preoperative factors associated with HAD and the utility of assessing physical function at ICU discharge in patients who have undergone cardiovascular surgery.
This prospective study was conducted at Sakakibara Heart Institute, the hospital
with the highest number of cardiovascular surgeries and the largest cardiac
rehabilitation center in Japan. We included 236 patients (median age, 73 years;
34% female) who required an ICU stay of at least 72 hours after undergoing
cardiovascular surgery and underwent postoperative rehabilitation at our hospital
between May 2018 and November 2020. The exclusion criteria were ICU stay
Schematic presentation of study procedure. This study included 236 patients who required an ICU stay of at least 72 hours after undergoing cardiovascular surgery and underwent postoperative rehabilitation.
The Barthel index (BI) was used to assess ADL levels preoperatively and at discharge, and HAD was defined as a decrease in the BI score between discharge and prior to surgery of at least 5 points. The BI consists of 10 items: (1) feeding, (2) moving from wheelchair to bed and return, (3) personal toilet, (4) getting on and off the toilet, (5) bathing, (6) transferring, (7) ascending and descending stairs, (8) dressing, (9) controlling bowels, and (10) controlling bladder. Independence is scored as 0, 5, 10, and 15 points according to the degree, and the total score was calculated for each patient [9]. The preoperative ADL level was obtained either directly from the patient or from relatives, about the condition that was not exacerbated before admission.
Physical Function ICU Test-scored (PFIT-s), Functional Status Score for the ICU (FSS-ICU), and Medical Research Council (MRC)-sumscore were used to assess physical function in the ICU. PFIT-s is composed of four items: (1) sit-to-stand assistance, (2) cadence, (3) shoulder flexion strength, and (4) knee extension strength; each item was scored to a sum of 0 to 3 points and evaluated on a 10-point scale converted to an interval scale [10]. FSS-ICU was scored from 0 to 7 (35 points total) for each of the five following actions: (1) rolling, (2) transfer from supine position to sitting, (3) sitting at the edge of bed, (4) transfer from sitting to standing, and (5) walking according to the degree of independence [11, 12]. The MRC-sumscore classifies the muscular strength in shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, wrist dorsiflexion, hip flexion, knee extension, and ankle dorsiflexion, attributing a score from 0 to 5 [13]. Each assessment was measured one day before or on the day of ICU discharge. Physical function assessment at ICU discharge was performed by three physiotherapists with at least 5 years’ clinical experience. Preoperative and discharge BIs are routinely assessed by our hospital’s well-trained physiotherapists. Data were collected by researchers who were blinded to the predictive factors.
We also examined arousal (Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale) [14], pain (Numerical Rating Scale) [15], circulatory dynamics (mean blood pressure, heart rate, and atrial fibrillation), respiratory status (percutaneous oxygen saturation), and ICU mobility scale [16] at the time of physical function assessment.
Postoperative cardiac rehabilitation was performed in compliance with the Guidelines for Rehabilitation in Cardiovascular Diseases established in 2012 [17] and in consultation with the attending physician. The days on which a patient was able to independently sit, stand, practice walking, and walk 100 m are referred to as the starting date of each of these activities. In addition, we assessed the extent of exercise performed in the cardiac rehabilitation room, consisting mainly of aerobic exercise using a bicycle ergometer and treadmill as well as resistance training.
The following data were collected from medical records: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), medical history of comorbidities, preoperative blood biochemistry examination, intraoperative records, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, duration of ventilator intubation, intra-aortic balloon pumping, continuous renal replacement therapy, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV), and postoperative complications. Postoperative delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU [18].
Continuous variables are reported as the median (interquartile range [IQR]),
whereas categorical variables are expressed as percentages. The Shapiro–Wilk
test was used to verify a normal distribution. In group comparisons, the
Mann–Whitney U test were performed for continuous variables and the
Preoperative characteristics, intraoperative findings, and postoperative course
are shown in Tables 1,2. Of the 236 patients included in the analysis, 58
(24.6%) exhibited HAD. Compared with the non-HAD group, the HAD group had
significantly lower PFIT-s, FSS-ICU, and MRC-sumscores at ICU discharge
(p
Receiver-operating characteristic analysis of physical
functional evaluation as a predictor of hospitalization-associated disability.
The area under the curve was (A) 0.71 (95% CI, 0.63–0.79; p
non-HAD | HAD | p value | OR | 95% CI | ||
(n = 178) | (n = 58) | |||||
Age, years | 72 (65–78) | 79 (68–82) | 1.04 | 1.01–1.08 | ||
Female, n (%) | 58 (32.6) | 23 (39.7) | 0.33 | 1.36 | 0.74–2.51 | |
BMI, kg/m |
23.6 (21.3–26.5) | 22.0 (20.1–23.6) | 0.88 | 0.81–0.96 | ||
Comorbidity, n (%) | ||||||
Hypertension | 112 (62.9) | 38 (65.5) | 0.72 | 1.12 | 0.60–2.08 | |
Diabetes mellitus | 49 (27.5) | 9 (15.5) | 0.07 | 0.48 | 0.22–1.06 | |
Coronary artery disease | 28 (15.7) | 10 (17.2) | 0.79 | 1.12 | 0.51–2.46 | |
Chronic kidney disease | 39 (21.9) | 16 (27.6) | 0.38 | 1.36 | 0.69–2.67 | |
Chronic heart failure | 15 (8.4) | 7 (12.1) | 0.41 | 1.49 | 0.58–3.86 | |
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 3 (1.7) | 3 (5.2) | 0.16 | 3.18 | 0.62–16.22 | |
Musculoskeletal disorder | 33 (18.5) | 11 (19.0) | 0.94 | 1.03 | 0.48–2.19 | |
Cerebrovascular disorder | 15 (8.4) | 10 (17.2) | 0.06 | 2.26 | 0.96–5.36 | |
Blood biochemistry | ||||||
Hemoglobin, g/dL | 12.9 (11.6–14.1) | 11.9 (10.6–13.1) | 0.76 | 0.65–0.89 | ||
Creatinine, mg/dL | 0.96 (0.77–1.23) | 1.04 (0.82–1.64) | 0.16 | 1.09 | 0.97–1.22 | |
Albumin, g/dL | 3.9 (3.5–4.0) | 3.6 (3.3–3.9) | 0.41 | 0.21–0.78 | ||
CRP, mg/dL | 0.26 (0.05–1.55) | 0.19 (0.05–1.24) | 0.83 | 1.01 | 0.93–1.09 | |
*p HAD, hospitalization-associated disability; BMI, body mass index; CRP, C-reactive protein; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. |
non HAD | HAD | p value | OR | 95% CI | ||
(n = 178) | (n = 58) | |||||
Surgery type, n (%) | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.24–4.05 | |||
CABG | 50 (28.1) | 9 (15.5) | ||||
Valve | 17 (9.6) | 3 (5.2) | ||||
Thoracic aortic | 44 (24.7) | 26 (44.8) | ||||
Multiple | 59 (33.1) | 19 (32.8) | ||||
Other | 8 (4.5) | 1 (1.7) | ||||
Emergent, n (%) | 105 (59.0) | 39 (67.2) | 0.26 | 1.43 | 0.75–2.67 | |
Operation time, min | 280 (206–352) | 311 (220–365) | 0.05 | 1.18 | 1.00–1.38 | |
CPB time, min | 151 (104–192) | 174 (116–214) | 0.13 | 1.00 | 1.00–1.01 | |
Bleeding, mL | 230 (114–360) | 259 (160–345) | 0.72 | 1.00 | 1.00–1.00 | |
IMV, h | 26 (19–38) | 40 (25–58) | 0.10 | 1.00 | 1.00–1.01 | |
APACHE II score, points | 17 (14–21) | 19 (16–22) | 0.01* | 1.08 | 1.02–1.16 | |
IABP, n (%) | 24 (13.5) | 6 (10.3) | 0.53 | 0.74 | 0.29–1.91 | |
NPPV, n (%) | 22 (12.4) | 14 (24.1) | 0.03* | 2.26 | 1.07–4.77 | |
CRRT, n (%) | 7 (3.9) | 4 (6.9) | 0.36 | 1.81 | 0.51–6.42 | |
Delirium, n (%) | 28 (15.7) | 23 (39.7) | 3.52 | 1.81–6.83 | ||
ICU stay, days | 5 (4–6) | 6 (5–9) | 1.13 | 1.04–1.22 | ||
Hospital stay, days | 15 (12–22) | 19 (10–29) | 0.03* | 1.03 | 1.00–1.05 | |
Cardiac rehabilitation, days | ||||||
Sitting | 2 (1–2) | 2 (2–3) | 0.06 | 1.16 | 0.99–1.36 | |
Standing | 2 (1–2) | 2 (2–4) | 1.36 | 1.12–1.67 | ||
Walking | 4 (3–5) | 5 (4–8) | 1.23 | 1.11–1.37 | ||
100 m walking | 6 (5–8) | 8 (7–17) | 1.08 | 1.02–1.14 | ||
Introduction of rehabilitation room | 69 (38.8) | 6 (10.3) | 0.18 | 0.07–0.45 | ||
PFIT-s, points | 8.8 (7.9–10.0) | 7.1 (5.9–8.8) | 0.65 | 0.55–0.77 | ||
FSS-ICU, points | 25 (22–29) | 22 (17–26) | 0.90 | 0.85–0.95 | ||
MRC-sumscore, points | 60 (56–60) | 57 (52–60) | 0.93 | 0.89–0.98 | ||
Barthel index, points | ||||||
Preoperative | 100 (100–100) | 100 (100–100) | 0.19 | 0.91 | 0.79–1.05 | |
Discharge | 100 (100–100) | 73 (55–90) | 0.42 | 0.32–0.57 | ||
*p CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pumping; NPPV, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation; CRRT, continuous renal replacement therapy; ICU, intensive care unit; PFIT-s, Physical Function ICU Test-scored; FSS-ICU, Functional Status Score for the ICU; MRC, Medical Research Council; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. |
Overall | ||
(n = 236) | ||
Postoperative day, days | 5 (3–6) | |
Sedation (RASS) | 0 (0–0) | |
Pain (NRS) | 0 (0–2) | |
Delirium, n (%) | 23 (9.7) | |
Mean arterial pressure, mmHg | 83 (75–93) | |
Heart rate, bpm | 80 (72–89) | |
Postoperative atrial fibrillation, n (%) | 24 (10.2) | |
SpO |
97 (96–98) | |
ICU mobility scale, n (%) | ||
4 (Standing) | 6 (2.5) | |
5 (Transferring) | 10 (4.2) | |
6 (Marching on spot) | 43 (18.2) | |
177 (75.0) | ||
RASS, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale; NRS, Numerical Rating Scale; SpO |
Univariate | Multivariate | ||||||
OR | 95% CI | p value | OR | 95% CI | p value | ||
Age ( |
2.63 | 1.41–4.91 | 2.48 | 1.21–5.08 | 0.01 | ||
BMI ( |
2.25 | 1.19–4.27 | 0.01 | 1.54 | 0.72–3.28 | 0.27 | |
APACHE II score ( |
2.02 | 1.10–3.72 | 0.02 | 1.59 | 0.78–3.22 | 0.20 | |
Delirium | 3.52 | 1.81–6.83 | 3.40 | 1.60–7.23 | |||
Standing ( |
2.91 | 1.56–5.43 | 2.16 | 1.06–4.46 | 0.04 | ||
Physical function | |||||||
PFIT-s ( |
5.59 | 2.95–10.57 | 4.84 | 2.39–9.81 | |||
FSS-ICU ( |
2.55 | 1.38–4.73 | 1.94 | 0.97–3.89 | 0.06 | ||
MRC-sumscore ( |
3.31 | 1.76–6.21 | 2.43 | 1.22–4.87 | 0.01 | ||
BMI, body mass index; APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; PFIT-s, Physical Function ICU Test-scored; FSS-ICU, Functional Status Score for the ICU; MRC, Medical Research Council; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. |
Univariate | Multivariate | ||||||
OR | 95% CI | p value | OR | 95% CI | p value | ||
Age (years) | 1.04 | 1.01–1.08 | 1.04 | 1.00–1.08 | 0.03 | ||
BMI (kg/m |
0.88 | 0.81–0.96 | 0.97 | 0.87–1.07 | 0.52 | ||
APACHEII (point) | 1.09 | 1.02–1.16 | 1.06 | 0.98–1.14 | 0.14 | ||
Delirium | 3.52 | 1.81–6.83 | 2.93 | 1.40–6.15 | |||
Standing (point) | 1.36 | 1.12–1.67 | 1.14 | 0.94–1.39 | 0.18 | ||
Physical function | |||||||
PFIT-s (point) | 0.65 | 0.55–0.77 | 0.69 | 0.57–0.84 | |||
FSS-ICU (point) | 0.90 | 0.85–0.95 | 0.91 | 0.86–0.97 | |||
MRC-sumscore (point) | 0.93 | 0.89–0.98 | 0.95 | 0.90–1.00 | 0.05 | ||
BMI, body mass index; APACHE, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; PFIT-s, Physical Function ICU Test-scored; FSS-ICU, Functional Status Score for the ICU; MRC, Medical Research Council; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. |
In this study, the incidence of HAD was 24.6%, and age, postoperative delirium, the starting date of standing, and physical function at ICU discharge were identified as associated factors. There have been many previous reports of age-related decline in physical function [19, 20], and the age-related decline in physical reserve and mental function, such as cognitive decline and depression, have been shown to be risk factors for HAD [6]. In addition, patients with HAD had significantly longer duration of ventilator intubation, increased NPPV usage, and longer ICU stay. In cases of unstable postoperative respiratory and circulatory dynamics, patients are forced to rest in bed and require long-term ICU management. Under these circumstances, postoperative delirium is more likely to develop and has been shown to be a risk factor for ADL reduction [21, 22]. In the older adult population, environmental changes due to hospitalization may lead to decreased ADL independence and activity, resulting in HAD [6]. Recently, it was reported that if physical function and ADL were impaired during ICU stay, these impairments remained following ICU discharge [23, 24]. It has also been shown that low physical function during the ICU stay is a predictor of a decrease in QOL and short-term and long-term prognosis after ICU discharge [4, 5]. Although early mobilization can help to prevent a decline in physical function and ADL and improve the QOL [25, 26, 27], usually patients with HAD require postoperative recumbency and long-term ventilator management due to major surgery, leading to delays in the ability of standing and walking. Therefore, in addition to the marked decrease in physical function at the time of ICU discharge and delayed rehabilitation progression thereafter, the failure to transition from exercise therapy in the ward to that in the cardiac rehabilitation room may have prevented a re-acquisition of function until the time of discharge.
In this study, the traditionally widely used PFIT-s, FSS-ICU, and MRC-sumscore were utilized as an assessment index for physical function in the ICU. Although the FSS-ICU was identified as a significant factor in univariate analysis, the significance was lost in multivariate analysis. Drains and infusions are often placed in the long term after cardiovascular surgery, inhibiting physical activity and movement in ICU patients. FSS-ICU was scored based on the degree of independence in movement, but the postoperative placement decreased the movement at ICU discharge, resulting in a lower score indicating that the assessment as a physical function lacked validity. The MRC-sumscore evaluates limb muscle strength, whereas the PFIT-s comprehensively assesses and scores physical performance and endurance in addition to muscle strength. Therefore, we believe that the PFIT-s was more helpful as a method to predict HAD in this study.
Generally, safety and validity are considered when assessing physical function in the ICU [28]. In the immediate postoperative period, exacerbation of pain and variations in respiratory and circulatory dynamics are likely to occur during the evaluation, and these effects may be reflected in the evaluation results. In this study, at the time of evaluating physical function, the arousal level and analgesic control were close to normal and respiratory and circulatory dynamics were stable. In addition, 97.5% of the patients with HAD were able to secure until transferring, suggesting that the restriction of activities did not affect the evaluation of physical functions. Altogether, to prevent HAD, we believe that assessing physical function at ICU discharge could be suitable to design a rehabilitation program following major surgery and a subsequent stay in the ICU.
Since this study included severe cases requiring an ICU stay of at least 72 hours after performing cardiovascular surgery, our results may not apply to patients who are discharged from the ICU earlier. However, the strategy for preventing HAD after surgery should be applied for patients with a long ICU stay. We also excluded patients with an early hospital transfer, those who died in the hospital due to serious complications after surgery, and those who required treatment by other departments preferentially; therefore, patients with severe complications, such as multiple organ failure, were not considered, so that the impact of physical examination on the risk of HAD in such cases remains unclear. Because general physical ability of older adult population is increasing in Japan [29], and our hospital is one of the largest cardiovascular centers in Japan, many patients are referred by other hospitals as candidates for surgery with better preoperative physical function (high BI before surgery).
In addition to physical functions, such as muscle strength, various functional components, including dexterity and cognitive function, are associated with basic ADL [30]; however, these functional assessments were not performed in this study.
Physical function at ICU discharge was an independent factor associated with HAD in critically ill postoperative cardiovascular surgery patients. Moreover, it was shown that the PFIT-s and MRC-sumscore may be useful predictors of HAD and feasible tools in assessing physical function in the ICU.
KHi, AN, MS, TA, KI, KHo, TS, ST, GH and MI were involved in the conceptualization and methodology of the study. KHi, TA, KI, and KHo performed the study. KHi, AN, and MS designed the study. AN, MS, TS, ST, GH and MI provided help and advice on the study. KHi and AN analyzed the data. KHi and AN wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Sakakibara Heart Institute (Approval ID: 18-010). Participants of this study were informed in advance regarding the purpose, content, and handling of survey results, and consent was obtained. We adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Guidelines for Research in the Department of Life Sciences and Medical Sciences for People.
We would like to thank the members of the Department of Cardiac Rehabilitation for their assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.
This study was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in Japan (No. 19K19828).
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.