Academic Editor: Ferdinando Carlo Sasso
Background: Diabetes mellitus is a major risk element for
cardiovascular disease. In the present study we investigated whether
1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG), a new marker for glucose monitoring, can predict
patient outcome following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: A
total of 270 AMI patients who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) at
Beijing Hospital from March 2017 to 2020 were enrolled in this prospective cohort
study. The serum 1,5-AG concentration and biochemical indicators were evaluated
prior to CAG. Cox regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship
between 1,5-AG levels and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events
(MACCEs), and with all-cause mortality. Results: During the median
follow-up period of 44 months, 49 MACCEs occurred and 33 patients died. The
1,5-AG level was significantly lower in the MACCEs group than in the MACCEs-free
group (p = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis also revealed that low 1,5-AG
levels were associated with MACCEs (p
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major cause of death and disability worldwide [1]. Patients who survive AMI remain at high risk of heart failure, recurrent AMI, and stroke even with revascularization and secondary prevention drug therapy [2, 3, 4]. Several promising biomarkers have recently been suggested to improve the risk stratification of AMI patients.
1,5-Anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) is a new biomarker of acute hyperglycemia in cardiac diabetology, reflecting glucose status within 1–3 days or 2 weeks [5, 6, 7]. Glucose abnormalities are very common comorbidities in cardiovascular disease patients, and approximately 50%–70% of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) have impaired glycemic regulation [8, 9]. Some studies have reported that glycemia fluctuation may play a major role in the development of atherosclerosis and could also be an independent predictor for cardiovascular comorbidities in patients with diabetes [10, 11]. However, it remains unclear whether acute glycemic fluctuations have any prognostic significance in patients with AMI.
1,5-AG is a carbon-1 deoxy pyranose and is primarily obtained from dietary intake. It is metabolically inert and present at almost constant levels in blood and tissues [12]. Glucose is structurally similar to 1,5-AG. When blood glucose levels rise sharply, high urinary glucose levels prevent the reabsorption of 1,5-AG by renal tubules, thereby resulting in 1,5-AG excretion from the urine and decreased serum levels [13]. Previous studies demonstrated that low 1,5-AG concentrations were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients without CAD or stroke [14, 15]. However, it is still unclear whether serum 1,5-AG is useful for predicting major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in patients with AMI. The aim of this study was therefore to examine the prognostic significance of acute glucose fluctuations in AMI patients, as reflected by 1,5-AG levels.
All patients in this prospective cohort study were from the Beijing Hospital Atherosclerosis Study (BHAS) (Clinicaltrials.gov registry number NCT03072797). Included were AMI patients who received coronary angiography (CAG) from March 2017 to 2020 at Beijing Hospital. Exclusion criteria were severe cardiac insufficiency, severe valvular heart disease, severe pulmonary disease malignancy or primary pulmonary hypertension, and severe hepatic or renal impairment. The study protocol obeyed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Hospital (2016BJYYEC-121-02). All patients provided written informed consent.
Data for various demographic parameters were collected from hospital records. The serum 1,5-AG level was measured in all patients before their CAG by KingMed Diagnostics on a Roche Modular 702 system using a pyranose oxidase assay kit (batch number: 20-0825) from Beijing Strong Biotech. Glucose, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and creatinine (Crea) levels were evaluated in the clinical laboratory of Beijing Hospital using assay kits (batch number are 846RJR, 841RAS, 933RAS, 846RBS, 843RAS, 850RKR respectively) from Sekisui Medical Technologies (Osaka, Japan) on a Hitachi 7180 chemistry analyzer. All laboratory parameters were measured in venous blood samples collected within 24 hours of patient admission and prior to CAG.
AMI was defined as recommended in the current guidelines [16]. The complexity of coronary artery stenosis is reflected in the Gensini score [17], which was determined in all AMI patients by giving a score to each coronary stenosis. A higher Gensini score indicates more severe coronary artery stenosis.
The primary endpoint was the composite endpoints of MACCEs. These were comprised of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, and re-hospitalization for other cardiovascular causes. The secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. All patients were monitored annually, with adverse incidents recorded at each visit.
Continuous variables were described as the mean
A total of 270 hospitalized patients were investigated (Fig. 1). The average age
of this study cohort was 67.7
Patient flow chart for the study cohort. Abbreviations: AMI, acute myocardial infarction; CHD, coronary heart disease.
Variable | MACCEs-free group | MACCEs group | p-value |
(n = 221) | (n = 49) | ||
Age, years | 66.8 |
71.3 |
0.011 |
Male gender, % | 154 (70.0%) | 34 (69.4%) | 0.933 |
BMI, kg/m |
25.0 (22.9, 26.9) | 24.6 (23.0, 26.6) | 0.764 |
SBP, mmHg | 133 |
134 |
0.778 |
DBP, mmHg | 76 |
74 |
0.684 |
Hypertension, % | 150 (67.9%) | 38 (77.6%) | 0.183 |
Dyslipidemia, % | 74 (33.5%) | 23 (46.9%) | 0.076 |
Diabetes mellitus, % | 126 (57.0%) | 40 (81.6%) | 0.001 |
Stroke, % | 17 (7.7%) | 6 (12.2%) | 0.302 |
Family history of early onset CAD, % | 21 (9.5%) | 2 (4.1%) | 0.219 |
Smoking, % | 80 (36.2%) | 13 (26.5%) | 0.198 |
Glucose, mmol/L | 6.80 (5.60, 8.95) | 8.65 (6.13, 10.48) | 0.006 |
1,5-AG, µg/mL | 18.88 (8.94, 28.74) | 9.65 (3.29, 21.69) | 0.001 |
TC, mmol/L | 3.66 (3.04, 4.43) | 3.46 (2.93, 4.02) | 0.121 |
TG, mmol/L | 1.48 (1.10, 1.96) | 1.51 (1.11, 1.74) | 0.603 |
HDL-C, mmol/L | 0.92 (0.78, 1.11) | 0.86 (0.75, 1.10) | 0.150 |
LDL-C, mmol/L | 2.17 (1.68, 2.79) | 2.06 (1.53, 2.61) | 0.248 |
Crea, µmol/L | 82.0 (72.0, 96.0) | 89.0 (75.5, 112.0) | 0.055 |
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m |
74.53 (55.97, 94.05) | 59.88 (38.51, 82.53) | 0.007 |
Gensini score | 44.00 (25.75, 74.50) | 60.00 (32.50, 101.00) | 0.019 |
Type of myocardial infarction | 0.417 | ||
NSTEMI, % | 154 (69.7%) | 37 (75.5%) | |
STEMI, % | 67 (30.3%) | 12 (24.5%) | |
Abbreviations: MACCEs, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TC, triglycerides; TG, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Crea, creatinine; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; NSTEMI, Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; STEMI, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction. |
Overall, 49 (18.1%) MACCEs occurred during the median follow-up period of 44.0
(33.8, 54.0) months. These included 18 cardiac deaths, 1 myocardial infarction,
11 revascularizations, 2 strokes, and 17 re-hospitalizations for other cardiac
reasons. Relative to patients in the first quintile, the HR for MACCEs was
significantly lower in patients with a 1,5-AG level above the fourth quintile
(1,5-AG
Hazard ratio for MACCEs according to 1,5-AG quintiles. The
vertical lines indicate the hazard ratio and 95% CI for quintiles 2 to 5 of
1,5-AG relative to quintile 1. Quintile 1 (1,5-AG
After a median follow-up time of 44 months, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the
cumulative event rate for MACCEs was 24 (30.8%) in the low 1,5-AG group
(
Kaplan-Meier plot of 1,5-AG to predict the occurrence of MACCEs
in AMI patients. 1,5-AG as a categorical value was used to predict MACCEs
according to the cut-off value (8.8
Kaplan-Meier plot of 1,5-AG to predict all-cause mortality in
AMI patients. 1,5-AG as a categorical value was used to predict all-cause
mortality according to the cut-off value (8.8
Univariate analysis showed that age, eGFR, Gensini score, glucose, DM and 1,5-AG
were significant risk factors for MACCEs in AMI patients (all p
Variable | HR | 95% CI | p-value |
Age, years | 1.033 | 1.007–1.060 | 0.014 |
Male gender, % | 1.005 | 0.547–1.844 | 0.988 |
BMI, kg/m |
0.988 | 0.905–1.079 | 0.791 |
SBP, mmHg | 0.998 | 0.985–1.011 | 0.760 |
DBP, mmHg | 1.003 | 0.976–1.031 | 0.840 |
Hypertension, % | 1.526 | 0.780–2.987 | 0.217 |
Dyslipidemia, % | 1.502 | 0.857–2.634 | 0.156 |
Diabetes mellitus, % | 3.008 | 1.497–6.369 | 0.002 |
Stroke, % | 1.523 | 0.648–3.580 | 0.334 |
Family history of premature cardiovascular disease, % | 0.533 | 0.129–2.197 | 0.384 |
Smoking, % | 1.433 | 0.760–2.703 | 0.266 |
Glucose, mmol/L | 1.083 | 1.012–1.159 | 0.021 |
Categorical variables | |||
1,5-AG |
reference | reference | reference |
1,5-AG |
2.718 | 1.551–4.765 | 0.001 |
TC, mmol/L | 0.772 | 0.552–1.078 | 0.129 |
TG, mmol/L | 0.841 | 0.591–1.197 | 0.337 |
HDL-C, mmol/L | 0.328 | 0.089–1.213 | 0.095 |
LDL-C, mmol/L | 0.813 | 0.555–1.190 | 0.287 |
Crea, µmol/L | 1.001 | 1.000–1.003 | 0.105 |
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m |
0.987 | 0.978–0.997 | 0.012 |
Gensini score | 1.010 | 1.003–1.017 | 0.003 |
Type of myocardial infarction | |||
NSTEMI, % | reference | reference | reference |
STEMI, % | 0.762 | 0.397–1.462 | 0.414 |
Abbreviations: MACCEs, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; 1,5-AG, 1,5-anhydroglucitol; TC, triglycerides; TG, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Crea, creatinine; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; NSTEMI, Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; STEMI, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction. |
Variable | HR | 95% CI | p-value |
Age, years | 1.011 | 0.981–1.043 | 0.471 |
Glucose | 0.984 | 0.893–1.085 | 0.751 |
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m |
0.995 | 0.984–1.007 | 0.418 |
Gensini score | 1.007 | 0.999–1.014 | 0.069 |
Diabetes mellitus,% | 1.882 | 0.795–4.457 | 0.151 |
Categorical variables | |||
1,5-AG |
reference | reference | reference |
1,5-AG |
2.000 | 1.047–3.821 | 0.036 |
Multivariate model: 1,5-AG as a categorical variable, Age, Glucose, eGFR, Gensini score, Diabetes mellitus. Abbreviations: MACCEs, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; 1,5-AG, 1,5-anhydroglucitol; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate. |
The present study found that 1,5-AG levels could predict MACCEs in AMI patients. Although we did not observe a significant association between 1,5-AG levels and all-cause mortality in these patients, the present results suggest that 1,5-AG may help to identify patients who are at increased risk of MACCEs.
Traditional cardiovascular risk factors do not accurately estimate the variation in cardiovascular risk between individuals, with most people having only one or none of the classical cardiovascular risk factors [18]. It is therefore very important to identify new risk factors. The serum 1,5-AG marker reflects acute blood glucose elevation and as such is a new indicator for diabetes management. When the glucose level exceeds the renal threshold for urine sugar, 1,5-AG is excreted through the urine, resulting in a rapid decline in serum levels [19]. Low 1,5-AG levels are therefore relevant to poor glycemic management. Due to the inverse correlation between 1,5-AG levels and blood glucose, the presence of low 1,5-AG levels during AMI may be a manifestation of acute hyperglycemia. The latter has been associated with poor prognosis, regardless of the presence of diabetes [20]. This is also consistent with the results of our recent cross-sectional study that demonstrated a non-linear relationship between low serum 1,5-AG levels and CAD severity [21]. In the present study, we found that low 1,5-AG levels also predicted the risk of medium to long-term MACCEs in AMI patients (Fig. 3). Low 1,5-AG levels should therefore be considered not just as a marker of acute phase severity, but also as a marker of persistent cardiovascular risk.
Several previous studies have shown that low 1,5-AG levels were associated with
an increased risk of CAD. Ikeda et al. [22] found that low 1,5-AG
levels were an independent predictor of CAD risk. Selvin et al. [23]
reported a markedly increased risk of CAD, stroke, heart failure, and death in
patients with a 1,5-AG level of
So far, however, there is a lack of data on the prognostic utility of 1,5-AG for
AMI patients. In patients without CAD and DM, Ikeda et al. [25] found that the risk of MACCEs was 2.34-fold higher in those with
The primary mechanism of AMI is known to be thrombosis secondary to unstable plaque rupture or intimal erosion. A recent study of 144 ACS patients with concomitant DM found that low 1,5-AG levels were an independent determinant of plaque rupture [28]. We speculate that 1,5-AG may be involved in the development of AMI, and the pathogenesis could be explained by the following considerations. First, it has been shown that 1,5-AG is closely associated with oxidative stress in DM patients, and this is known to play a crucial role in the development of atherosclerotic plaques [29, 30, 31]. Second, Teraguchi et al. [32] found that short-term glucose fluctuations were significantly and positively correlated with CD14+CD16+ monocytes. The receptors for these cells can be activated by binding to chemokines produced at the site of inflammation, secretion of various pro-inflammatory factors, and enhancement of the local inflammatory response. In addition, 1,5-AG may also be involved in endothelial dysfunction [33]. Monitoring of 1,5-AG levels could therefore be useful for determining the risk of coronary plaque rupture at an early stage.
This study has several limitations. Firstly, it was a single-center study with a small population, and all patients were from the same region, thus limiting the generalizability of the results. Secondly, the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors can affect 1,5-AG levels, and the effect of this class of drugs on the study outcomes were not considered. Furthermore, additional baseline clinical data such as the incidence of cardiogenic shock, infarct type (anterior, inferior or posterior infarction), time from symptom onset to revascularization, and the GRACE risk score need to be further refined and included in our model. Finally, further studies are required to determine whether intervention to alter the 1,5-AG concentration can reduce the risk of AMI and the incidence of MACCEs.
The 1,5-AG concentration is a marker of short-term blood glucose fluctuation. In the current study the 1,5-AG level was also found to be predictive of MACCEs in patients with AMI. In addition to being a possible new marker for glucose monitoring, 1,5-AG may be helpful for risk stratification of AMI patients.
1,5-AG, 1,5-anhydroglucitol; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; CAG, coronary, angiography; MACCEs, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CAD, Coronary artery disease; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Crea, creatinine; UA, uric acid; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; DM, diabetes mellitus.
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
JD, WC, XY and FJ were responsible for the study design and execution. WZ, XW, XY finished the coronary angiography procedures and clinical data collection. SW, RY finished all the laboratory measurements and data collection. YW, YZ and ZW performed the data analysis. YW and RY wrote the main manuscript. XY and JD edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Beijing Hospital, Number: 2016BJYYEC-121-02). All patients gave their informed consent to participate in this study.
Not applicable.
This study was supported by National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (Grant No BJ-2022-124 and No BJ-2022-113), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (No. 2021-I2M-1-050).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.