IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 51 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog5102050
Open Access Original Research
Ultrasound Characteristics of Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Carcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study
Show Less
1 School of Medicine, University of Tuzla, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
2 Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, General Hospital Tešanj, 74260 Tešanj, Bosnia and Herzegovina
3 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, School for Health Studies, University of Bihać, 77000 Bihać, Bosnia and Herzegovina
4 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Hospital Merkur Zagreb, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Croatia Zagreb, Croatian Academy of Medical Sciences, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
5 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, J.W. Goethe University of Frankfrut, 60487 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
*Correspondence: cerovac.anis@gmail.com (Anis Cerovac)
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2024, 51(2), 50; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5102050
Submitted: 3 November 2023 | Revised: 10 December 2023 | Accepted: 25 December 2023 | Published: 23 February 2024
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Both objective and subjective transvaginal sonography (TVS) methods are used to assess the degree of myometrial invasion (MI). Subjective TVS assessment of MI (<50% or >50%) may be as good or better than any objective measurement technique. The aim of this study is to examine the ultrasound characteristics of endometrial cancer (EC) in two groups of patients; with myometrial invasion less and greater than 50%. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study included 60 female patients with pathohistologically (PHD) proven endometrial cancer. Patients were divided into two groups, after surgery and PHD assessment of MI degree, into those with less and more than 50% MI. The degree of MI was performed by subjective assessment (<50% and >50%). Results: The frequency of anteroposterior (AP) diameter of EC greater than 2 cm was statistically significantly higher in the group of subjects with MI >50% (p < 0.00001). The volume of EC in the group of patients with MI >50% is statistically significantly higher, with a difference of 10.48 milliliters compared to the group of subjects with MI <50% (p < 0.00014). The difference in the average distance of the EC from the serosa is 0.11 cm between the two examined groups and is statistically significant (p = 0.0394). The kappa concordance coefficient for the subjective TVS method versus the PHD finding was statistically significant (p < 0.001), and was kappa = 0.72. Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy showed that the subjective TVS method compared to the gold standard in the diagnosis of MI >50% has a good diagnostic value: accuracy = 0.87; sensitivity = 0.77; specificity = 0.94; positive predictive value = 0.91; negative predictive value = 0.84; positive likelihood ratio = 13.08; negative likelihood ratio = 0.25. According to the subjective method of TVS, the degree of MI was overestimated in 5.9% of respondents, underestimated in 23.1%. Conclusions: The three dimensions, as well as the volume of endometrial cancer, obtained by TVS, are significantly higher in subjects with >50% myometrial invasion; there is also a significantly higher frequency of EC diameter greater than 2 cm in the group of subjects with >50% myometrial invasion.

Keywords
endometrial neoplasms
myometrium
infiltration
ultrasound
transvaginal
1. Introduction

Gynecological examination is usually completed by transvaginal sonography (TVS), which is usually the first imaging method [1].

When TVS is performed by an experienced examiner, it is not always necessary to perform additional investigations to assess the local extent of the disease when it comes to endometrial cancer, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) [1, 2].

On TVS, myometrial invasion (MI) appears as iso-hyperechoic tissue relative to the surrounding myometrium. Although MI is often well-diagnosed, it can sometimes only be suspected based on the irregular appearance of the endomyometrial zone [1, 3].

Both objective and subjective TVS methods are used to assess the degree of MI [1]. Objective evaluation is done using the Gordon and Karlsson ratio or method [2, 3, 4, 5].

Subjective TVS assessment of MI (<50% or >50%) may be as good or better than any objective measurement technique with a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 81% [1, 5].

Alcázar et al. [4] investigated that the sensitivity and specificity of TVS in detecting deep MI in endometrial cancer (EC) is 82% and 81%.

Currently, TVS represents one of the best possible inexpensive recording techniques. In addition to wide availability and cost-effectiveness, further advantages are that with this technique the examination can be performed quickly, reliably, safely and without additional stress for the patient. The reliability of the method depends on the quality of the ultrasound device, as well as the experience of the doctor performing the examination. The presence of adenomyosis, leiomyoma or endometrial polyps can be an aggravating circumstance in the assessment of MI [5, 6].

The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy achieved in the study by Miklos et al. [6] further justify the integration of TVS into the standard preoperative protocol for EC patients. The rationale is that TVS provides information on the basis of which there is a possibility of making the correct decision about what type of surgical treatment should be performed, thus increasing the survival rates of patients and the overall therapeutic benefit [5, 6].

The aim of this study is to examine the ultrasound characteristics of endometrial cancer in two groups of patients; with myometrial invasion less and greater than 50%.

2. Patients and Methods
2.1 Patients

The prospective study was conducted in the Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Clinical Center Tuzla in the period from 2019 to 2021. The research included 60 female patients hospitalized in the Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics for a planned surgical procedure, due to pathohistologically (PHD) proven endometrial cancer.

The gold standard for assessing the degree of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma was the PHD finding of the surgical material.

The following parameters were monitored and analyzed:

-EC dimensions in three planes on TVS;

-volume of EC on TVS;

-distance of EC from serosa measured by TVS;

-degree of MI by subjective assessment method (<50% and >50%).

The inclusion criteria are patients with pathohistologically proven endometrial cancer.

The exclusion criteria for patients with PHD proven EC are those subjects with a history of another malignant disease, who were previously operated for EC, treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy for EC or another malignant disease, who underwent preoperative CT and PHD proven EC incidentally after hysterectomy.

Patients were divided into two groups, after surgery and PHD assessment of MI degree, into those with less and more than 50% MI.

The prospective study was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committee of the University Clinical Center Tuzla, and each patient signed an informed consent for inclusion in biomedical research before being included in this study.

2.2 Methods

All TVS examinations were performed by one examiner (AC). TVS examinations were performed using a standardized protocol containing all investigated sonographic parameters defined before the beginning of the study. All TVS examinations were performed with a 5 MHz vaginal probe on a GE Voluson E8 ultrasound machine (GE HealthCare Technologies, Heller International Building, Chicago, IL, USA) the day before surgery [7].

The entire uterus was examined in the sagittal plane from one lateral to the contralateral edge, as well as in the horizontal plane from the cervix to the fundus. EC was evaluated in 2D gray scale and described using International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) terminology [7, 8].

TVS variables evaluated during the two-dimensional examination include data on: size of the uterus and EC in three planes, volume of the EC, distance of the EC from the anterior, posterior wall, fundus and cervix of the uterus, the smallest distance of the EC from the serosa or minimal tumor-free margin, corresponding to normal myometrial width, degree of MI, presence, location and number of fibroids [5, 7].

EC was measured with three orthogonal dimensions. Two dimensions of EC in the sagittal plane are anteroposterior (AP) (tumor thickness) and craniocaudal (tumor length), the third dimension is laterolateral (tumor width) measured in the transverse plane [7, 8].

The minimal tumor-free margin was measured in any plane in which the distance from the tumor to the serosa appeared to be the smallest. EC volume was calculated from the three dimensions of the tumor, according to the formula for the ellipsoid (V = 4/3 π× d1 × d2 × d3) [8]. The degree of MI was measured as the distance between the endomyometrial zone and the maximum depth of the tumor. The AP diameter of the uterus and tumor in the sagittal plane was measured [5, 7]. The degree of MI was performed by subjective assessment (<50% and >50%) as showed on Figs. 1,2 [7].

Fig. 1.

Assessment of myometrial invasion in patient with subjective method of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS). Stage IA endometrial cancer in a 65-year-old postmenopausal woman, correctly diagnosed by TVUS.

Fig. 2.

Assessment of myometrial invasion in patient with subjective method of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS). Stage IB endometrial cancer in a 62-year-old postmenopausal woman, correctly diagnosed by TVUS.

The selected cut off limit of the degree of MI (50%) follows the latest International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification from 2009.

2.3 Statistical Analysis

Statistical processing was done in the SPSS 24.0 software package (IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Basic tests of descriptive statistics were performed, with the display of measures of central tendency and dispersion.

Each variable was tested for belonging to a normal distribution using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and a histogram display. Quantitative variables were compared by t-test with correction for unequal variances where they were normally distributed. Where they did not, the Mann-Whitney test was used. All statistical tests were performed with a statistical probability level of 95% (p < 0.05). Categorical variables were analyzed with the χ2-test, with Yates’ continuity correction for 2 × 2 tables, or Fisher’s test for analyzes in which the frequency in individual cells was less than 5. All statistical tests were performed with a statistical probability level of 95% (p < 0.05).

3. Results

The basic demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.Basic demographic and clinical characteristics of study participants.
Characteristics Value (%)
Age at menopause (years) 50.1 (40‒61) *
Premenopausal 8 (13.3) *
Perimenopausal 7 (11.7)
Postmenopausal 45 (75)
Abnormal uterine bleeding as first sign 58 (96.7)
Myometrial invasion
Superficial (<50 %) 34 (56.7)
Deep (>50 %) 26 (43.3)

*Data are given as median (5th percentile; 95th percentile) for continuous variables; n (%) for categorical variables.

The average degrees of MI in EC for the gold standard - pathohistological method, are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.Average degree of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer for the pathohistological method.
Method PHD <50% PHD >50% Total % p (student t test)
PHD %, SD (±) 22 (0.144) 69 (0.144) 42.71 (27.47) 0.00001
Rank 0–45 51–98 0–98

PHD, pathohistologically; SD, standard deviation.

The three EC dimensions obtained by TVS (expressed in centimeters) are statistically significantly higher in patients with MI >50% (Table 3).

Table 3.Dimensions of endometrial cancer on TVS.
Dimensions (cm) PHD <50% PHD >50% Total p (student t test)
Anteroposterior, SD (±) 1.57 (0.71) 2.86 (1.06) 2.13 (1.08) 0.00001
Rank 0.51–3.12 0.7–5.93 0.51–5.93
Craniocaudal, SD (±) 2.97 (0.91) 3.64 (1.03) 3.26 (1.08) 0.0049
Rank 1.34–4.59 1.96–6.33 1.34–6.33
Laterolateral, SD (±) 2.26 (0.86) 2.73 (1.02) 2.47 (0.95) 0.0029
Rank 1–4.45 0.89–4.34 0.89–4.45

TVS, transvaginal sonography.

The frequency of AP diameter of EC, measured by TVS, of less and greater than 2 centimeters in the two examined groups is shown in Table 4. The frequency of AP diameter of EC greater than 2 cm was statistically significantly higher in the group of subjects with MI >50%. (Z = 4.396; p < 0.00001) (Table 4).

Table 4.Anteroposterior diameter of endometrial cancer on TVS smaller and larger than 2 centimeters.
Anteroposterior diameter PHD <50% PHD >50% Total % p (Z test)
<2 cm N (%) 26 (76.4) 5 (19.2) 31 (51.6) 0.00001
>2 cm N (%) 8 (23.5) 21 (80.7) 29 (48.3) 0.00001
Total N (%) 34 (100) 26 (100) 60 (100) -

χ2 = 17.1; df = 1; p = 0.000035.

The volume of EC on TVS expressed in milliliters in the two examined groups is shown in Table 5. The volume of EC in the group of patients with MI >50% is statistically significantly higher (Mann Whitney; Z = –3.79; p < 0.00014), with a difference of 10.48 milliliters compared to the group of subjects with MI <50% (Table 5).

Table 5.Endometrial cancer volume on TVS.
Volume PHD <50% PHD >50% Total p
Volume (mL), SD (±) 6.10 (5.46) 16.58 (12.72) 10.6 (10.61) 0.00014
Rank 0.81–21.09 1.02–54.24 0.81–54.24

The distance of the EC from the serosa—the minimum tumor-free zone expressed in centimeters, measured by TVS, is shown in Table 6. The difference in the average distance of the EC from the serosa is 1.1 cm between the two examined groups and is statistically significant (Mann Whitney; Z = 2.05; p = 0.0394) (Table 6).

Table 6.Distance of endometrial carcinoma from serosa measured by TVS.
Distance from serosa PHD <50% PHD >50% Total p
Distance (cm), SD (±) 1.15 (0.56) 1.04 (1.29) 1.10 (0.94) 0.0394
Rank 0.31–2.6 0.1–7.0 0.1–7.0

The concordance of the diagnosis of MI over 50% by means of TVS method was then evaluated against the gold standard - the finding obtained by PHD diagnostics.

When it came to the subjective TVS method, a tabular representation of the concordance of the findings is given in Table 7. The kappa concordance coefficient for the subjective TVS method versus the PHD finding was statistically significant (p < 0.001), and was kappa = 0.72. Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy showed that the subjective TVS method compared to the gold standard in the diagnosis of MI >50% has a good diagnostic value (Table 6). According to the subjective method of TVS, the degree of MI was overestimated in 5.9% of respondents, underestimated in 23.1%.

Table 7.Subjective method of transvaginal sonography in the assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer.
Subjective method TVS >50% PHD <50% PHD >50% Total p (Z test)
N (%) N (%) N (%)
Yes 2 (5.9) 20 (76.9) 22 (36.7) 0.00001
No 32 (94.1) 6 (23.1) 38 (63.3) 0.00001
Total N (%) 34 (100) 26 (100) 60 (100) -

Accuracy = 0.87 (95% CI: 0.74–0.92);
Sensitivity = 0.77 (95% CI: 0.63–0.83); Specificity = 0.94 (95% CI: 0.83–0.99);
PPV = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.74–0.98); NPV = 0.84 (95% CI: 0.75–0.89);
+LR = 13.08 (95% CI: 3.74–74.46); –LR = 0.25 (95% CI: 0.17–0.45);
+LR, positive likelihood ratio; –LR, negative likelihood ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

4. Discussion

Our prospective cohort study, in which we analyzed the ultrasound characteristics of endometrial cancer and the degree of myometrial invasion, showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the assessment of the degree of MI between the subjective TVS method and histopathology as gold standard. Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy showed that the subjective TVS method compared to the gold standard in the diagnosis of MI >50% has a good diagnostic value.

Ultrasound parameters; three dimensions of EC obtained by TVS, AP diameter of EC greater than 2 cm as well as volume of EC are statistically significantly higher in subjects with MI >50%. A significant finding of our study is that the difference in the average distance of the EC from the serosa is 1.1 cm between the two examined groups and is statistically significant.

The average degree of MI measured by the PHD method in our study was 42.71%, the difference between the two groups was significant. There are studies with higher and lower average degrees of MI. The average rate of MI in our study is similar to the study by Prueksaritanond et al. [9], 48.4%. In the study by Oge et al. [10], the average degree of MI was 70%, higher than in our study, given that it was only about patients with stage IB EC, while in the study by Kim et al. [11], the average degree of MI was 18.4%, lower than in our study considering the larger number of patients with IA stage EC.

In our study, according to the gold standard, PHD diagnosis, the superficial degree of MI (<50%) is more common, which correlates with the majority of reviewed studies and with the fact that EC is detected at an early stage in most cases [5, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22].

Tumor size is the strongest single TVS predictor of high-risk EC. The three dimensions of EC obtained by TVS (expressed in centimeters) are statistically significantly higher in subjects with MI >50%. The AP diameter of the EC in our study is 21.3 mm, while in the Tatar study [21], it is 34.7 mm. Epstein et al. [8] analyzed EC diameter according to histological grades G1 (13 mm), G2 (17 mm) and G3 (23.5 mm), and came to the conclusion that tumor size (diameter and volume) is very important for distinguishing low-risk and high-risk tumors EC. Frühauf et al. [5] measured all three tumor diameters (antero-posterior, cranio-caudal and latero-lateral) and obtained values similar to those in our study.

There is a significant difference in prognosis and treatment between patients with EC smaller than 2 cm or larger than 2 cm [23]. The diagnostic performance of AP tumor diameter >2 cm is similar to the Karlsson method in the prediction of deep MI. AP tumor diameter greater than 2 cm increases the chance of metastasis to the lymph nodes [24]. In our study, the frequency of AP EC diameter greater than 2 cm was significantly higher in the group of subjects with MI >50%. In the total AP sample, tumor diameter greater than 2 cm was present in 48.3% of cases, similar to the study by Eriksson et al. [25], 43.2%.

In the study by Epstein et al. [8], EC volume was shown in different histological grades G1 (5.1 mL), G2 (7.7 mL) and G3 (14.9 mL). The most significant TVS difference between high-grade and low-grade EC is the size of the tumor (diameter and volume), color score, shape of blood vessels, and damage to the endomyometrial zone [8]. In our study, the average EC volume for the entire sample was 10.6 mL. In the MI <50% group it was 6.1 mL, and in the MI >50% group 16.58 mL, significantly higher, with a difference of 10.48 milliliters compared to the group of subjects with MI <50%. We suggest cut off value for EC volume in differentiating deep myometrial invasion form superficial is 10.48 milliliters.

The volume of EC successfully reflects the stage of the disease, the prognosis and the type of surgery required. The percentage of patients with high-risk pathohistological findings (grade 3 and non-endometrioid EC type), deep MI, lymph node invasion, and extrauterine spread of the disease increases with increasing EC volume [23]. The volume of the EC is important for making a decision on the type of surgery required. Preoperatively measured EC volume by MRI can provide useful information about EC stage, lymph node invasion, prognosis, and required surgical treatment. However, the volume of EC is not superior than assessment of the degree of MI in predicting the presence of metastases in the lymph nodes [23].

The distance of EC from the serosa measured by TVS is a promising diagnostic and prognostic marker. Liro et al. [26] compared the usefulness of the distance of EC from the serosa and the degree of MI in assessing the locoregional extension of the disease and lymph node invasion. They came to the conclusion that both methods, alone or in combination, are a significant aid in obtaining preoperative information about the status of lymph nodes. They believe that the use of the distance of EC from the serosa is easier compared to measuring the degree of MI as a marker of EC invasion, given that both methods have similar predictive value in the assessment of invasion and lymph node status. The cut-off value of the distance from the serosa is 5.2 mm in the prediction of lymph node metastases [26].

The distance of the EC from the serosa—the minimal tumor-free zone measured by TVS, is greater in the group of subjects with MI <50%, and smaller in the subjects with MI >50%. The difference in the average distance of the EC from the serosa is 11 mm between the two examined groups, which is significant. The average distance from the serosa in our study was 11 mm, while in the study by Liro et al. [26] it was 7.39 mm. Thus, our study confirmed that the distance of EC from the serosa correlates with the degree of MI. We suggest cut off value for minimum free myometrial zone in differentiating deep myometrial invasion form superficial is 11 mm.

The kappa concordance coefficient for the subjective method of TVS versus PHD findings was significant, and was kappa = 0.72, significantly higher than in the study by Eriksson et al. [13], in which it was 0.52 and 0.48, while in the study by Savelli et al. [27] it was 0.67. The subjective method of TVS against the gold standard in the diagnosis of MI >50% has a good diagnostic value, better than in the studies analyzed below, sensitivity 77%, specificity 94%, positive predictive value (PPV) 91%, negative predictive value (NPV) 84% and overall accuracy 87%.

For the subjective TVS method, the reviewed studies reported sensitivity from 56% to 85%, specificity from 69% to 91.3%, PPV from 61% to 79%, NPV from 79% to 92% and overall accuracy from 75.7% to 84% [4, 5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 21, 24, 27, 28, 29].

In a large prospective study, the performance of subjective and objective TVS methods in the detection of deep MI in grade 1 and 2 EC was compared. A subjective prediction model, which included the histological grade of EC and a subjective assessment of the degree of MI, and an objective prediction model, which included the histological grade and an objective measurement of the distance of the EC from the serosa, were also used. In the three analyzed studies, they came to the conclusion that subjective TVS assessment is superior to ultrasound measurements, objective TVS methods in assessing the degree of MI [5, 14, 24].

Based on our experience during the conducted study, we can list several differences between endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial polyps and endometrial cancer which may be of practical importance. Endometrial hyperplasia gives an ultrasound image of inhomogeneous, hyperechoic and thickened endometrium with small cysts. In the case of an endometrial polyp, there is a clearly limited hyperechoic formation inside the uterine cavity, usually with a scant amount of fluid in the uterine cavity. Ultrasound characteristics of endometrial cancer are thickened endometrium, >6 mm, inhomogeneous and hyperechoic, in the case of myometrial invasion, a visible break in the continuity of the endomyometrial halo, the presence of fluid in the uterine cavity.

Our study has limitations, primarily a small sample of study participants and a short period of sample collection. The advantage of the study refers to the prospective, and to the fact that one person performed ultrasound examinations and analyzed all study participants.

5. Conclusions

The three dimensions, as well as the volume of endometrial cancer, obtained by TVS, are significantly higher in subjects with >50% myometrial invasion; there is also a significantly higher frequency of EC diameter greater than 2 cm in the group of subjects with >50% myometrial invasion.

The subjective method of TVS has a good diagnostic accuracy in the diagnosis of myometrial invasion >50% compared to the histopathology as gold standard.

Availability of Data and Materials

All data points generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and there are no further underlying data necessary to reproduce the results.

Author Contributions

AC designed the research study. AC performed the research. DH and ZH provided help and advice on the experiments and analyzed the data. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

All subjects gave informed consent to be included before participating in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Clinical Center Tuzla (approval number No 02-09/2-2/20).

Acknowledgment

Thanks to all the peer reviewers for their opinions and suggestions which improved the quality of our manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Dubravko Habek is serving as one of the Editorial Board members/Guest editors of this journal. We declare that Dubravko Habek had no involvement in the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to Michael H. Dahan.

References
[1]
Rizzo S, Femia M, Buscarino V, Franchi D, Garbi A, Zanagnolo V, et al. Endometrial cancer: an overview of novelties in treatment and related imaging keypoints for local staging. Cancer Imaging. 2018; 18: 45.
[2]
Gordon AN, Fleischer AC, Reed GW. Depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: preoperative assessment by transvaginal ultrasonography. Gynecologic Oncology. 1990; 39: 321–327.
[3]
Karlsson B, Norström A, Granberg S, Wikland M. The use of endovaginal ultrasound to diagnose invasion of endometrial carcinoma. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1992; 2: 35–39.
[4]
Alcázar JL, Orozco R, Martinez-Astorquiza Corral T, Juez L, Utrilla-Layna J, Mínguez JA, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2015; 46: 405–413.
[5]
Frühauf F, Zikan M, Semeradova I, Dundr P, Nemejcova K, Dusek L, et al. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in Assessment of Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer: Subjective Assessment versus Objective Techniques. BioMed Research International. 2017; 2017: 1318203.
[6]
Miklos P, Klacko M, Babala P, Masak L, Ondrus D, Waczulikova I. Transvaginal ultrasound examination of myometrial infiltration by endometrial cancer. Bratislavske Lekarske Listy. 2014; 115: 14–18.
[7]
Cerovac A, Ljuca D, Arnautalic L, Habek D, Bogdanovic G, Mustedanagic-Mujanovic J, et al. Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: a prospective comparative study. Radiology and Oncology. 2022; 56: 37–45.
[8]
Epstein E, Fischerova D, Valentin L, Testa AC, Franchi D, Sladkevicius P, et al. Ultrasound characteristics of endometrial cancer as defined by International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) consensus nomenclature: prospective multicenter study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018; 51: 818–828.
[9]
Prueksaritanond N, Cheanpracha P, Yanaranop M. Association of Serum HE4 with Primary Tumor Diameter and Depth of Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer Patients at Rajavithi Hospital. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention: APJCP. 2016; 17: 1489–1492.
[10]
Oge T, Comert DK, Cakmak Y, Arık D. Is Tumor-Free Distance an Independent Prognostic Factor for Early-Stage Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer? Journal of Oncology. 2020; 2020: 2934291.
[11]
Kim SI, Yoon JH, Lee SJ, Song MJ, Kim JH, Lee HN, et al. Prediction of lymphovascular space invasion in patients with endometrial cancer. International Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021; 18: 2828–2834.
[12]
Brocker KA, Radtke JP, Hallscheidt P, Sohn C, Schlemmer HP, Alt CD. Comparison of the determination of the local tumor extent of primary endometrial cancer using clinical examination and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging compared to histopathology. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2019; 299: 1391–1398.
[13]
Eriksson LSE, Lindqvist PG, Flöter Rådestad A, Dueholm M, Fischerova D, Franchi D, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of myometrial and cervical stromal invasion in women with endometrial cancer: interobserver reproducibility among ultrasound experts and gynecologists. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2015; 45: 476–482.
[14]
Mascilini F, Testa AC, Van Holsbeke C, Ameye L, Timmerman D, Epstein E. Evaluating myometrial and cervical invasion in women with endometrial cancer: comparing subjective assessment with objective measurement techniques. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2013; 42: 353–358.
[15]
Ozdemir S, Celik C, Emlik D, Kiresi D, Esen H. Assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer by transvaginal sonography, Doppler ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and frozen section. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2009; 19: 1085–1090.
[16]
Rei M, Rodrigues I, Condeço P, Igreja F, Veríssimo C, Mendinhos G. Endometrial cancer: Preoperative versus intraoperative staging. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction. 2019; 101647.
[17]
Yang T, Tian S, Li Y, Tian X, Wang W, Zhao J, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Three-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasonography Scanning for Preoperative Assessment of High Risk in Women with Endometrial Cancer. Medical Science Monitor. 2019; 25: 2024–2031.
[18]
Yin XH, Jia HY, Shi M, Wu H, Li YM. Magnetic resonance imaging for detection of depth of myometrial invasion and cervical invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2015; 8: 19501–19505.
[19]
Goel G, Rajanbabu A, Sandhya CJ, Nair IR. A Prospective Observational Study Evaluating the Accuracy of MRI in Predicting the Extent of Disease in Endometrial Cancer. Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2019; 10: 220–224.
[20]
Karataşlı V, Çakır İ, Şahin H, Ayaz D, Sancı M. Can preoperative magnetic resonance imaging replace intraoperative frozen sectioning in the evaluation of myometrial invasion for early-stage endometrial carcinoma? Ginekologia Polska. 2019; 90: 128–133.
[21]
Tatar B. Assessment of myometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma with preoperative transvaginal sonography. European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. 2021; 42: 85–89.
[22]
Wu WJ, Yu MS, Su HY, Lin KS, Lu KL, Hwang KS. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative deep myometrium assessment in endometrial cancer. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2013; 52: 210–214.
[23]
Todo Y, Watari H, Okamoto K, Hareyama H, Minobe S, Kato H, et al. Tumor volume successively reflects the state of disease progression in endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. 2013; 129: 472–477.
[24]
Verbakel JY, Mascilini F, Wynants L, Fischerova D, Testa AC, Franchi D, et al. Validation of ultrasound strategies to assess tumor extension and to predict high-risk endometrial cancer in women from the prospective IETA (International Endometrial Tumor Analysis)-4 cohort. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2020; 55: 115–124.
[25]
Eriksson LSE, Nastic D, Lindqvist PG, Imboden S, Järnbert-Pettersson H, Carlson JW, et al. Combination of Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial cancer (ProMisE) with sonographic and demographic characteristics in preoperative prediction of recurrence or progression of endometrial cancer. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2021; 58: 457–468.
[26]
Liro M, Śniadecki M, Wycinka E, Wojtylak S, Brzeziński M, Stańczak A, et al. Ultrasound Measurement of Tumor-Free Distance from the Serosal Surface as the Alternative to Measuring the Depth of Myometrial Invasion in Predicting Lymph Node Metastases in Endometrial Cancer. Diagnostics. 2021; 11: 1472.
[27]
Savelli L, Ceccarini M, Ludovisi M, Fruscella E, De Iaco PA, Salizzoni E, et al. Preoperative local staging of endometrial cancer: transvaginal sonography vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2008; 31: 560–566.
[28]
Gastón B, Muruzábal JC, Lapeña S, Modroño A, Guarch R, García de Eulate I, et al. Transvaginal Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessing Myometrial Infiltration in Endometrioid Low Grade Endometrial Cancer: A Prospective Study. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2022; 41: 335–342.
[29]
Pineda L, Alcázar JL, Caparrós M, Mínguez JA, Idoate MA, Quiceno H, et al. Agreement between preoperative transvaginal ultrasound and intraoperative macroscopic examination for assessing myometrial infiltration in low-risk endometrioid carcinoma. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016; 47: 369–373.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share
Back to top