- Academic Editor
Background: The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy
of temporary bilateral uterine artery blockage for cesarean scar defects when
combined with laparoscopy and hysteroscopy. Methods: We evaluated 126
patients who had one or more cesarean deliveries with abnormal uterine bleeding
(12–20 days). All eligible women were informed of the potential complications,
benefits, and alternatives, for each approach before they were assigned into one
of two treatment groups. Group A received temporary bilateral uterine artery
occlusion and vasopressin injection while Group B received vasopressin injection
only. Results: Mean blood loss was 54.70
The numbers of fertile women undergoing cesarean section delivery have increased considerably worldwide over the years [1, 2]. Furthermore, the obstetric complications associated with previous cesarean section, such as placenta previa, placenta accrete, and uterine rupture, are also increasing in subsequent pregnancies [3]. In addition to obstetric complications, some researchers have described a correlation between cesarean section and primary gynecological disturbances, such as continuous discharge, chronic pelvic pain, prolonged menstruation and postmenstrual spotting, thus causing negative effects on the daily life of patients [3, 4]. Thurmond et al. [4] described an anatomical defect in the anterior lower uterine segment in nine patients at the site of the cesarean scar by ultrasound; all of these patients experienced a postmenstrual discharge involving brown or dark red material lasting from 2 to 12 days. The clinical complications of cesarean scar defection (CSD) have aroused an increasing amount of public concern. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop new methods to rebuild the muscular layer of the scar site.
Defect correction is an important treatment method for women who wish to preserve their uterus and fertility. The use of vasopressin cannot effectively control hemostasis, the bradycardia and cardiac complications and the loss of peripheral pulses have been reported after repeated injections of vasopressin [5]. In view of these insufficiencies, we demonstrated that temporary bilateral uterine artery blockage during laparoscopy procedure is a feasible and safe technique for anatomical correction and to eliminate the symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding.
This was a retrospective investigation that was carried out in a single-center study. Between January 2014 and January 2017, 126 patients with prior cesarean section deliveries presented with prolonged period of menstruation (12–20 days) and were recruited into our study. The defection of the isthmus of the cervical canal was confirmed by saline infusion sonohysterography (SIS) findings, showing an anechoic defect located between the bladder and the anterior lower uterine segment of the cesarean section scar. The treatment protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jinhua Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine (ethics approval No: 2017-53) and informed written consent was provided by all patients. The exclusion criteria [6] were as follows: (1) menstrual irregularities prior to cesarean section; (2) the previous use of an intrauterine contraceptive device; (3) uterine malformations; (4) a history of coagulation disorder; and (5) the presence of any other organic uterine disease that could cause menstrual irregularities, including endometrial hyperplasia, polyps, leiomyoma, or endometrial carcinoma. A total of 126 patients were finally included in this study. Patients were assigned to two groups (Fig. 1). Group A consisted of 64 patients and Group B consisted of 62 patients. The patient characteristics and related material are given in Tables 1,2,3.
Consort flow diagram.
Characteristics | Group A | Group B | p value |
Age (years) | 31 (26–43) | 32 (25–44) | 0.709 |
No. of previous cesarean sections | 1–3 | 1–3 | |
No. of patients (n) | 64 | 62 | |
Body mass index (kg/m |
21.78 |
21.20 |
0.166 |
Blood loss in operation (mL) | 54.70 |
190.82 |
|
Operation time (min) | 84.45 |
86.31 |
0.535 |
The distribution of the enrolled patients’ age, body mass index, number of
previous cesarean sections and patients, blood loss and operation time were
described in detail. There were no differences in age, body mass index and
operation time between two groups (p
Characteristics | Group A | Group B | p value | |
Average duration of menstruation (days) | ||||
Preoperation | 14.38 |
14.68 |
0.460 | |
Postoperation | 6.92 |
7.16 |
0.543 | |
p value | ||||
Mean thinnest residual myometrium (mm) | ||||
Preoperation | 2.08 |
2.25 |
0.301 | |
Postoperation | 5.39 |
5.28 |
0.550 | |
p value |
During the following period, the average duration of menstruation in both groups
significantly decreased compared with those before operation (p
Characteristics | Group A | Group B | p value | |
The efficacy of anatomic correction n (%) | 62/64 (96.88%) | 60/62 (96.77%) | ||
The relief rate of abnormal spotting n (%) | 0.794 | |||
Improved | 58/64 (90.63%) | 57/62 (91.94%) | ||
Not improved | 6/64 (9.38%) | 5/62 (8.06%) |
During the following period, the efficacy of anatomic correction and the relief
rate of abnormal spotting no significantly differences between two groups
(p
Prior to study entry, all defects were measured by SIS. First, a speculum with a catheter was placed inside the uterus. Normal saline was then introduced into the cervix and uterine cavity while retracting the catheter to completely eliminate the small amounts of air within. We continued until we reached a maximum volume of 10 mL, or until uterine cramps occurred or the backflow of water was observed from the cervix [5]. After the speculum had been removed and the vaginal probe reinserted, the thinnest residual myometrium and the shape of the defect were measured and recorded directly, as described previously [7]. The shape of the defect was classified according to a classification scheme published previously [7].
Patients were placed in the Trendelenburg position and then placed under general anesthesia. In Group A, the bladder peritoneum was opened and the anterior leaf of the broad ligament was separated by blunt and sharp dissection in laparoscopic procedure. The bladder peritoneum was then incised and the bladder was separated away from the lower segment of the uterus completely. After we separated the uterine artery, we used titanium clips to block the bilateral uterine arteries in place under direct vision (Fig. 2). The clips were easy to apply and remove. The structure of these clips is similar to non-invasive forceps and causes less damage to vessels when compared with other clips. Next, we located the uterine artery via the posterior leaf of the broad ligament. Vasopressin 6U was injected into the cervical stroma. In Group B, we opened the bladder peritoneum, and then injected vasopressin. A Fr15 hysteroscope was inserted into uterine cavity to observe the cesarean scar defect. Hysteroscopic examination (Fig. 3) allowed us to visualize the cesarean scar defect in great detail. With illumination from a cold light source under hysteroscopic guidance (Fig. 4), a transverse incision was made to open the CSD laparoscopically. Then, the defect was completely resected to the normal margins of the incision with scissors (Fig. 5). The normal healthy muscular wound margins were then stitched with 1-0 absorbable sutures (Ethicon, Inc., LLC., Raritan, NJ, USA) in a continuous fashion (Fig. 6). Each sutured was not tightened completely so as to ensure that each stitch could be inserted into the whole layer of the myometrium. After the incision had been sutured completely, the stitches were tightened one by one until the final knot was created. The titanium clips in Group A were removed after sutures, and flow was returned to both uterine arteries after removing the titanium clip. The application and removal of the titanium clips was performed according to the approach described in our previous paper [8]. Once sutures were complete, hysteroscopy was repeated to ensure that the defect had been corrected. Finally, the peritoneum was closed. All excised tissues were sent for pathological examination to exclude other forms of malignancy in the scar tissue.
Transient occlusion of uterine artery with a titanium clip (left side).
Hysteroscopy showed a small diverticulum at the site of the cesarean scar.
The illumination from cold light source of hysteroscopic guidance.
Resected the defection of the scar to the normal margins with scissors.
Stitched the normal margins of the defection in a continuous fashion.
Patients were followed-up for 12 months. We evaluated the perioperative blood
loss by calculating the blood volume in the suction bottles during the surgery;
we also recorded the duration of surgery. Uterine bleeding was estimated via the
use of a special menstrual application before and after surgery. SIS was
performed and the alleviation of abnormal uterine bleeding was assessed at 12
months post-surgery. The result of spotting was graded on a 3-point scale
according to the duration of menstruation, as follows: 3-points, postoperative
menstrual duration
All statistical analysis was carried out with Statistical Package for Social
Science version 13.0 software (SPSS, Inc., an IBM Company, Chicago, IL, USA).
Data are presented as mean
Patient characteristics are given in Table 1. Perioperative and follow-up data
at 12 months after surgery are given in Tables 2, 3. The mean
perioperative blood loss was 54.70
Cesarean section is one of the most common surgical procedures in fertile women [1]. Furthermore, cesarean scar defects are estimated to occur in 60% of all cesarean section cases [9, 10]. The exact etiology of the such defects has yet to be fully elucidated. Uterine defection in cesarean section scars may arise from the cesarean section, infection, or events during labor. Antila-Långsjö et al. [9] and Zhou et al. [10] considered that the lack of coordinated muscular contractions around the scar tissue obstructed menstrual blood drainage and resulted in intermittent postmenstrual discharge. In another study, İsci et al. [11] and Paul et al. [12] reported the presence of endometriosis in previous cesarean incision scars; it is possible that the iatrogenic endometrial implantation theory could be responsible for such findings [13]. In one of our cases, laparoscopy showed a small endometriotic mass (approximately 0.5 cm) on the left side of the cesarean scar in the cesarean section defect (Fig. 7). Our own clinical experience, and the iatrogenic endometrial implantation theory, supports the fact that endometriosis may be related to the formation of CSDs. It is possible that the development of CSD symptoms may also be related to the number of cesarean deliveries and the size of the defect [14].
Laparoscopy showed a small endometriosis at the left site of the cesarean section defection.
Oral contraceptives may temporarily improve the symptoms of CSD [15]. However, many patients cannot accept these medications, due to the increased risk of deep vein thrombosis and the long-term nature of the treatment. The surgical methods to treat CSD include hysteroscopic surgery, laparotomy, transvaginal defection repair, and hysterectomy [16]. Mashiach R et al. [17] showed the success rates for treating postmenstrual uterine bleeding are comparable, with a slight edge in favor of laparoscopic over hysteroscopic surgery (78%–94% versus 60%–100%). Complete hysterectomy is a complete cure for patients who do not wish to have children. However, most of the individuals with uterine scar defects are still in child-bearing age; this limits the use of complete hysterectomy. The hysteroscopic approach has also been used to treat cesarean section scar abnormalities [18]. Under hysteroscopy, the defect site can be identified directly; this procedure involves removal of the fibrotic tissue in the inferior and superior edges of the pouch using a cutting loop and restoration to the continuity of the endometrium. The objective of resection is to facilitate menstrual discharge and reduce the accumulation of blood in the cervix [19, 20]; Wang et al. [21] showed about 59.6% to 100% of patients become asymptomatic after surgery, therefore, we considered hysteroscopic surgery is effective in reduce postmenstrual uterine bleeding. However, the weakness associated with the defect cannot be corrected by hysteroscopy, and the myometrial thickness in the defect site can be reduced further. Furthermore, the resection technique would increase the potential risk of uterine rupture during a subsequent pregnancy [9].
In the light of these findings, we used the laparoscopic surgical approach for the simultaneous removal and repair of defects. The common shape of these defects has been described as semicircular, triangular, droplet-shaped, and can sometimes include cysts [22]. CSD does not only exist in the anterior wall, but can also be exist in the lateral wall, and even extend to the posterior wall; in these cases, it is difficult to remove the defect in a delicate manner. Under hysteroscopic and SIS vision, it is possible to better assess the location and specific shape of the defect and thus minimize the possibility of the neglect correction of the scar defections (Fig. 8).
The cavity beside the cesarean section defection.
Suturing technique is very important when correcting CSD. The traditional suture method involves interrupted suturing to close the edges of the incision. However, the increased time required for suturing and confusion between stitches during surgery might lead to a longer operation time. In the current study, we pioneered the use of a continuous suture to close the incision. This method has two major advantages. Firstly, the technique is simpler to perform and avoids the need to tie multiple knots, thus saving time. Secondly, this technique allows us to completely close the whole myometrium layer at the incision site.
After surgery, the mean thinnest residual myometrium in Group A and B had
increased significantly when compared with pre-surgical values (p
It is important to note that 11 of the 126 patients with partial symptoms did not show any improvement after surgery (6 patients in Group A and 5 patients in Group B). After SIS, 4 of these patients still had a defect, although the size of the defect was smaller than before surgery. A second round of surgery was proposed to these patients due to the poor prospects of surgical repair; one patient requested hysterectomy as a definitive treatment. Another 10 patients wished to alleviate their symptoms by hormonal therapy. These 10 patients are still being followed up. The reasons for failure to achieve improvement in clinical symptoms may be that the surgeon was unable to completely repair the defect, especially on the uterine lateral side, a problem with suturing, because of the patient’s wound healing ability, or some unknown factors. Further research is now needed to investigate the specific pathological changes associated with CSD.
CSD may be associated with reproductive and gynecological consequences. The technique we developed in our study for the repair of CSD combined laparoscopic repair with hysteroscopic diagnosis using a minimally invasive approach. Transient bilateral uterine artery occlusion with titanium clips, combined with vasopressin injection, is a highly effective method for controlling massive hemorrhage. The accurate and complete removal of cesarean section scars, and delicate suturing, are the keys to success.
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to further research is needed in the future, but datasets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
MH and FT designed the research study. MH, FT and MS performed the research. LJi and LJin analyzed the data. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jinhua Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine (ethics approval No.2017-53) and informed written consent was provided by all patients.
Thanks are due to Dongge Wang for valuable discussion.
This research received no external funding.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.