IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 50 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog5002029
Open Access Original Research
Identification and Characteristics of Multidrug-Resistant Ureaplasm urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis Isolates among Female Patients with Recurrent Non-Gonococcal Urethritis in a Tertiary Hospital, China
Show Less
1 Department of Clinical Laboratory, Associated Hospital, Beihua University, 132013 Jilin, Jilin, China
2 Department of Renal Medicine, People’s Hospital of Jilin, 132012 Jilin, Jilin, China
3 Department of Clinical Microbiology, School of Laboratory Medicine, Beihua University, 132013 Jilin, Jilin, China
*Correspondence: limingcheng@beihua.edu.cn (Mingcheng Li)
These authors contributed equally.
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023, 50(2), 29; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5002029
Submitted: 29 August 2022 | Revised: 25 November 2022 | Accepted: 1 December 2022 | Published: 31 January 2023
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Concerns are increasing over the mechanisms of drug resistance pathogens among non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) or cervicitis. The study aims to explore the distribution of Ureaplasm urealyticum (U. urealyticum) and Mycoplasma homins (M. homins) isolates, characteristics of multidrug resistance, and the underlying mechanism to allow clinicians to deliver rational therapy for NGU. Methods: Samples from cervical secretions of 246 patients with NGU were collected. Mycoplasma culture and drug susceptibility tests were performed, respectively. The resistance genes were detected by multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), and the PCR products were cloned and sequenced. Results: Out of 246 samples, the overall prevalence of U. urealyticum and/or M. hominis infection was 39.02% (96/246). In 96 culture positive samples, the overall infection rate of U. urealyticum was higher than that of the single M. hominis (46.87% vs. 28.13%) (p < 0.05), and the coinfection rate was 25.00% (24/96). Each U. urealyticum and M. hominis isolate exhibited resistance to at least three types of antimicrobial agents (manifest by more than 70% resistance to erythromycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and spiramycin, followed by ofloxacin, roxithromycin, azithromycin and josamycine (with resistance thereto of more than 50%)). More than 80% of U. urealyticum and M. hominis isolates were susceptible to minomycine and doxycycline, whereas 81.16% and 77.44% of both U. urealyticum and M. hominis isolates were also susceptible to minomycine and doxycycline. Surprisingly, the resistance rate of the mixed infection was higher that of erythromycin, tetracycline and ciprofloxacin comparison to the single infection (p < 0.05). All tetracycline-resistant isolates carried the tetM gene and 50% of erythromycin-resistant isolates carried the ermA gene. Conclusions: Among outpatients with recurrent NGU, the U. urealyticum infection dominated, followed by M. hominis, mixed U. urealyticum and M. hominis infection. Minomycine and doxycycline are recommended for empirical clinical treatment. The determination of U. urealyticum and M. hominis infection, antibiotic susceptibility testing is crucial for effective therapy.

Keywords
non-gonococcal urethritis (cervix)
mycoplasma
infection
drug resistance
1. Introduction

Non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) or cervicitisis is one of the most common sexually transmitted diseases [1]. The main pathogens are Ureaplasma urealyticum (U. urealyticum) and Mycoplasma hominis (M. hominis) in addition to Chlamydia trachomatis [2]. If the treatment is not timeous, NGU is apt to induce chronic prostatitis, or epididymitis, in men. In addition, both U. urealyticum and M. hominis were associated with endometritis, salpingitis, or pelvic inflammatory disease in women. Meanwhile, they have been suggested to be related to infertility [3]. Tetracycline, quinolones, and macrolides are the first-choice drugs used to treat Mycoplasma spp. and Ureaplasma spp. infection [4]. In recent years, Mycoplasma spp. and Ureaplasma species resistant to these drugs are increasing due to the abuse of antibiotics or irregular treatment, mixed infection, or repeated infection by pathogens and other factors, especially with regard to increasingly multidrug-resistant isolates, resulting in NGU infection recurrent or persist [5, 6]. Persistent or recurrent NGU due to multidrug-resistant Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma infection has become a difficult problem facing those in clinical practice [7, 8]. Therefore, the study aimed to explore the drug-resistance mechanism of U. urealyticum and M. hominis isolates in China; the selection of sensitive drugs is the key to effective control of Mycoplasma infection.

In this study, U. urealyticum and M. hominis isolates from 246 cases of recurrent NGU with resistance to 12 antimicrobial agents and the mechanism of drug resistance were analyzed. The results offer a reference for clinicians to make the right choice of antimicrobial agents as best possible.

2. Clinical Data and Methods
2.1 Patients

We conducted a retrospective study of U. urealyticum and M. hominis-infected NGU patients at an affiliated hospital of Beihua University, China. 246 patients were enrolled in a gynecology outpatient clinic and sexually transmitted disease clinics during the period from June 2020 to June 2022. Clinical and microbiological data were recorded from the database. All of them had a history of sexual confusion or urethritis symptoms. Single U. urealyticum and M. hominis (or both) were positive after mycoplasma culture at the initial diagnosis. However, gonococcus, chlamydia, Candida, trichomonad, and other urogenital tract infections were excluded through clinical and laboratory tests. Empirical single antibiotic, or a combination of two antibiotics, for prophylaxis of NGU were administered with one month, and presence of coinfection with Chlamydia trachomatis was also excluded. Those with U. urealyticum and M. hominis combined with culture could still be positive with history of previous antibiotic prophylaxis for longer than two months could be included in the study. No repetitive isolates from a single patient were included. This study, entailing collection of clinical samples, was approved by the institutional ethics committees of the participating hospital and prior written informed consent was gained from all participants in the study.

2.2 Sample Collection

Firstly, a cotton swab was used to wipe away the excessive mucus in the cervix after the patient exposed the cervix, discarded it, and then another sterile swab was inserted into the cervix to a depth of 1 to 2 cm. After remaining in place for 10 to 30 seconds, the swab was slowly rotated it through one complete turn. The sample thus collected was rapidly inoculated into liquid medium and sent to the laboratory as soon as possible.

2.3 Cultivation and Detection of Resistance to 12 Antibiotics Agents

A mycoplasma identification verification and antibiotic susceptibility testing kit (RenFuBoSai, Co., Ltd, Zhengzhou, Henan, China) was used for the culture, identification, and antibiotic susceptibility assay according to the instructions supplied. The collected cotton swabs were washed in the culture medium, and 0.1 mL of culture medium was directly inoculated into 24 wells (50 μL per well), and two drops of sterile mineral oil were overlaid thereon. After inoculation, the strips were incubated at 37 °C in an incubator. The culture time for U. urealyticum was approximately 24 to 48 h, and that for the M. hominis 48 to 72 h whereupon any changes in color could be observed. Positive results were judged to be U. urealyticum positive and M. hominis positive at different times while the color of the culture medium changed from yellow to pink.

Regarding drug susceptibility, a panel of 12 antimicrobial agents including doxycycline, minomycine, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin sparfloxacin, erythromycin, spiramycin, josamycine, roxithromycin, and azithromycin could be determined by two concentration wells of each agent. Interpretation of drug susceptibility: both wells were sensitive if yellow, low-concentration if one well was red, high-concentration if one well was yellow for the intermediary, and both wells were red, indicative of drug resistance.

2.4 Detection of Related Resistance Genes by Multiple Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

500 μL of broth were collected into Eppendorf tubes; these were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 2 minutes, we discarded the supernatant, added 500 μL double-distilled water, placed in a metal water bath at 98 °C for 10 minutes, and immediately placed the samples in a refrigerator at –20 °C for 10 minutes. Samples were then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was used as a DNA template.

A series of primers for identification of resistance genes including erm and tet were designed (Table 1). A 50-μL reaction mixture of multiple PCR amplification included 5 μL of PCR master-mix and 1.5 μL of each primer (2.5 mM). 1.5 μL (25 μg/μL) of DNA extracts were used as templates and double-distilled water was supplemented to 50 μL. Two standard strains of ATCC 33175 and ATCC 15488 were used as positive controls, and ATCC 25922 was used as a negative control. Reactions were performed in 96 optical well plates and run in an Applied Biosystems 2720 Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Table 1.Oligonucleotide primers used in this study.
No. Primers Sequence (5’ to 3’) Expected length PCR condition
Ta °C te s
1 ermA F-AAGCGGTAAACCCCTCTGA 190 56 60
R-TTCGCAAATCCCTTCTCAAC
2 ermC F-AATCGTCAATTCCTGCATGT 299 56 60
R-TAATCGTGGAATACGGGTTTG
3 tetA F-GCTACACCTGCTTGCCT 410 56 60
R-CATAGATCGCCGTGAAGA
4 tetB F-TTGGTTAGGGGCAAGTTTG 320 56 60
R-GTAATGGGCCAATAACACCG
5 tetM F-AGTGGAGCGATTACAGAA 260 56 60
R-CATATGTCCTGGCGTGTCTA
6 tetK F-GTAGCGACAATAGGTAATAGT 159 56 60
R-GTAGTGACAATAAACCTCCTA

PCR steps were run at 94 °C for pre-denaturation for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 94 °C; the annealing temperature and conditions (Table 1) were applied for 30 s, followed by extension for 1 min at 72 °C and final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR amplicons were done under electrophoresis on 2% (w/v) agarose gel in TBE buffer at 70 V for 60 min. Gels were stained and the band size was estimated using a DNA Marker with a molecular weight of 100 to 1200 bp as a reference.

2.5 Cloning and Sequencing of PCR Amplicons

The target fragments of the PCR products were excised using a sterile scalpel. A gel kit for extraction of DNA (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was utilized to purify the PCR products extracted from the gel. Then the PCR products were ligated into the pGEM-T® Easy vector (Takara, Shiga, Japan) and transformed into E. coli DH5α competent cells. Nucleotide sequencing was conducted directly on the cloned fragments using services provided by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). The sequencing results were analyzed by BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) and compared to the GENBANK database.

2.6 Statistical Analysis

SSPS 10.0 statistical software (IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to compare the differences in U. urealyticum and M. hominis infection and drug resistance rates using the χ2 test.

3. Results
3.1 Epidemiological Characteristics of Patents and Isolates

All of patients had a course of disease of 3 to 26 months. They had an average age of 28.14 ± 3.5 years, a minimum age of 19 years and a maximum age of 59 years. Out of 246 samples, the overall prevalence of U. urealyticum and/or M. hominis infection was 39.02% (96/246). Of the 96 samples with a positive culture, the infection rate of U. urealyticum was higher than that of single M. hominis (46.87% vs. 28.13%) (p < 0.05), and the coinfection rate was 25.00% (24/96).

3.2 Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles

This research compared the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the individual U. urealyticum, M. hominis and both U. urealyticum and M. hominis isolated from 96 culture positive samples. Our findings showed that all U. urealyticum and M. hominis strains exhibited resistance to at least three kinds of antimicrobial agents (manifest as more than 70% resistance to erythromycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and spiramycin, followed by ofloxacin, roxithromycin, azithromycin, and josamycine (with more than 50% resistance thereto)). More than 80% of U. urealyticum and M. hominis strains were susceptible to minomycine and doxycycline, whereas 81.16% and 77.44% of both U. urealyticum and M. hominis strains were susceptible to minomycine and doxycycline. Surprisingly, the resistance rate under mixed infection was higher that of erythromycin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin compared to that under single infection (p < 0.05, Table 2).

Table 2.Drug susceptibility of U. urealyticum and M. hominis isolated from female patients with recurrent nongonococcal urethritis.
Antimicrobial agents U. urealyticum (n = 45) U. urealyticum + M. hominis (n = 24) M. homins (n = 27)
S (%) I (%) R (%) S (%) I (%) R (%) S (%) I (%) R (%)
Doxycycline 87.01 0.75 12.24 81.16 5.13 13.71 83.55 8.56 8.09
Minomycine 84.72 2.80 12.48 77.44 7.45 14.39 85.84 8.82 5.34
Tetracycline 2.38 20.23 77.39 3.53 15.76 91.51 3.56 20.12 76.32
Ciprofloxacin 15.08 11.04 73.88 9.48 10.50 82.54 14.25 15.45 70.30
Ofloxacin 22.41 18.42 59.17 21.42 20.74 57.84 23.56 20.45 55.99
Roxithromycin 20.54 19.28 60.18 21.42 17.34 61.24 20.32 16.26 63.42
Azithromycin 21.87 16.78 61.35 14.24 23.52 62.24 22.27 17.52 60.21
Erythromycin 20.45 6.31 73.24 21.51 1.12 77.37 32.55 3.88 63.57
Josamycine 23.53 0.13 67.25 11.34 18.54 70.12 21.82 6.16 72.02
Sparfloxacin 25.37 26.54 48.18 28.44 22.29 49.27 23.56 28.71 47.73
Spiramycin 15.04 12.67 72.29 12.13 21.68 65.23 9.27 13.49 77.24
Levofloxacin 20.63 30.13 49.24 15.64 23.61 60.75 20.74 11.66 67.60

S, Sensitivity; I, Intermediate; R, Resistance.

3.3 Detection and Sequencing of Drug Resistance Genes

The total DNA of multidrug-resistant U. urealyticum and M. hominis as a template, the tetracycline and erythromycin resistance genes could be detected by multiplex PCR. PCR products were sequenced and BLAST analysis from GenBank showed that the DNA sequences from tetM and ermA gene were 100% identical to those described in GenBank (data not shown). Both tetM and ermA genes were successfully amplified in all tetracycline-resistant, and 50% of erythromycin-resistant U. urealyticum and M. hominis strains (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Agarose gel electrophoresis of tetM and ermA genes detected by multiplex PCR among samples from recurrent non-gonococcal urethritis or cervicitis patients. Lane M, Marker; Lane 1, Positive control; Lane 2, Positive specimens carrying tetM and ermA; Lane 3–4, tetM gene; Lane 5, Negative control.

4. Discussion

The aetiology of recurrent or persistent NGU shows a multi-factor nature. Infectious agents including U. urealyticum and M. hominis isolates accounted for less than 30% worldwide [9]. Ideally, treatment with etiological diagnosis should be effective and incur only low-level side-effects. Mycoplasmas are intrinsically resistant to β-latam antibiotics in addition to glycopeptides because of the absence of cell walls and susceptibility to those that inhibit protein synthesis. Doxycycline and azithromycine were widely used as first-line treatment. The reason for the increasing number of drug-resistant U. urealyticum and M. hominis strains is mainly the abuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics and the irregular use of antibiotic-resistant strains [10, 11].

In the present study, the overall prevalence of U. urealyticum and/or M. hominis infection was 39.02% (96/246) out of 246 samples and multidrug-resistant U. urealyticum and M. hominis infection led to NGU recurrence or persistence among NGU patients. This finding is consistent with results reported by other studies [12, 13]. In fact, women are prone to infection with U. urealyticum and M. hominis strains, especially in sexually active periods. Mycoplasma spp. and Urealyticum species were found in the female urogenital system as a part of the normal flora. When the body was in a normal condition, there are no clinical symptoms. When the patient’s immunity was low and the patient’s genitourinary environment changed, the number of mycoplasmas would increase correspondingly and achieve the effect of pathogenicity, and more reports indicate that mycoplasma infection in the genital tract will not only cause pelvic inflammatory disease, endometritis, etc., but more serious cases will induce some pathological changes leading to female infertility [14, 15]. Zheng et al. [16] analyzed 4082 Chinese patients infected with U. urealyticum and M. hominis, and their findings showed that the rate of Mycoplasma infection was 48.2% in women. Similar to M. hominis, Mycoplasma genitalium (M. genitalium) is also part of the normal flora, however, it is difficult to culture the organism. Besides, evidence for any treatment of persistent or recurrent NGU should cover Mycoplasma, Chlamydia trachomatis, and even flora associated with bacterial vaginosis. Sarier et al. [17] reported that the quantification of the Mycoplasma load may provide a useful information for differentiating NGU infection or compensation. Generally, higher organism load (>1000 copies/mL of FVU) of U. urealyticum and M. hominis may be a predictor of NGU. More analytical assays are required for Mycoplasma spp. and Ureaplasma spp.

Tetracycline was the first-choice for treatment with U. urealyticum and M. hominis infection as well as erythromycin [18, 19]. In recent years, reports of resistance to tetracyclines and erythromycin have increased year-on-year. The average U. urealyticum resistance rate to tetracycline increased from 46.4% in 2000 to 68.3% in 2020 [18, 20]. The resistance rate of doxycycline is generally maintained at 35%, and it can, at time of writing, be used as a tetracycline-replacement drug. The resistance to tetracycline is mainly mediated by the membrane-associated tet protein, which acts mainly by exchanging protons with the cation complex of tetracycline [21, 22]. All tet proteins belong to the MF protein family, and at least 18 tetracycline active efflux system proteins have been recorded in bacteria [23]. The four efflux system protein genes including tetA, tetB, tetK, and tetM were detected in the study. The tetracycline-resistant strains were all positive for tetM, which was consistent with the drug-resistant phenotype. It was caused by the expression of ribosome-protected tetM protein. tetM is the most popular active efflux system in U. urealyticum isolates, as reported elsewhere [24, 25]. Additionally, the erythromycin-inactivating enzyme ermA gene, which is highly tolerant to erythromycin, was detected in erythromycin-resistant U. urealyticum and M. hominis isolates. The ermA gene expresses erythromycin ribosome methylation whose enzyme methylates erythromycin ribosomal target sites. The literature reports that bacteria resistance to erythromycin was related to the chemical structure of macrolides [26]. Interestingly, 50% of erythromycin-resistant U. urealyticum and M. hominis isolates carried the ermA gene.

In the present study, all U. urealyticum and M. hominis isolates were recognized as exhibiting multidrug-resistance. They exhibited resistance to at least three kinds of antimicrobial agents (manifest as more than 70% resistance to erythromycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and spiramycin, followed by ofloxacin, roxithromycin, azithromycin, and josamycine (with resistance thereto of more than 50%). More than 80% of U. urealyticum and M. hominis strains were susceptible to minomycine and doxycycline, whereas 81.16% and 77.44% of both U. urealyticum and M. hominis strains were susceptible to minomycine and doxycycline. Surprisingly, the resistance rate of the mixed infection was higher that of erythromycin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin when compared to commensurate rate under single infection. Besides, U. urealyticum and M. hominis isolates were highly resistant to ciprofloxacin. Fluoroquinolone antibacterial agents are among the most rapidly developed, chemically synthesized antibacterial agents in the past 20 years, and they are widely used in animal husbandry and medical applications [27, 28]. Studies have found that mutations in the DNA gyrase gene located on the Mycoplasma chromosome cause the DNA gyrase gene concerning antimicrobial agents to change, thereby reducing drug accumulation and drug resistance, which is the cause of quinolone resistance [29, 30].

Our findings reported the multidrug U. urealyticum and M. hominis isolates among female NGU patients in Eastern and Northern China and reflected certain regional profiles therein. On the one hand, female mucopurulent non-gonococcal cervicitis and urethritis are equivalent, on the other hand, the incidence of female infertility in China is increasing year-on-year. Infertility is a serious threat to women’s health. The spectrum of drug-resistance in Mycoplasma is constantly changing. U. urealyticum and M. hominis culture, plus drug susceptibility testing, can offer good guiding significance for clinical treatment [31, 32]. However, there were some limitations to the present research: first, the sample size was small, with some selection bias therein; second, we could not conduct laboratory screening to detect M. genitalium and Chlamydia trachomatis. Besides that, we could not quantitatively evaluate Mycoplasmas in the genital tract. Next, more data from multiple centers should be included and in-depth exploration of treatment could be conducted in future research.

5. Conclusions

Among outpatients with recurring NGU, the U. urealyticum infection dominated among Mycoplasma infections, followed by M. hominis, and mixed U. urealyticum and M. hominis infection. Minomycine and doxycycline are recommended for empirical clinical treatment. In the determination of U. urealyticum and M. hominis infection, antibiotic susceptibility testing is crucial for effective therapy.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author Contributions

LM conceived, designed the experiments and wrote a draft manuscript. BL and ML analyzed, interpreted the results of the experiments and revised the manuscript. WC performed the experiments. PL and XF collected the clinical data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Ethical approval for collecting clinical samples was received by the institutional ethics committees of the participating hospital (Ethical approval number: Protocol Number 2020-02-05). Informed consent forms were reviewed and signed by all participants before samples collection.

Acknowledgment

We thank three anonymous reviewers for excellent criticism of the article.

Funding

The present project was a part of Jilin Science and Technology Development Program (20190304101YY and 20190301014NY); the Health and Family Planning Commission of Jilin Province (2018J098) and “14th Five-Year Plan” Science and Technology Project of Jilin Provincial Department of Education (JJKH20220076KJJ) also supported the project.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
Beeton ML, Payne MS, Jones L. The Role of Ureaplasma spp. in the Development of Nongonococcal Urethritis and Infertility among Men. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2019; 32: e00137-18.
[2]
Kweon OJ, Lim YK, Oh SM, Kim TH, Choe HS, Lee SJ, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum in individuals with or without symptoms of genitourinary infections. Laboratory Medicine Online. 2016; 6: 79–87.
[3]
Leos-Alvarado C, Llaca-Díaz J, Flores-Aréchiga A, Pérez-Chávez F, Casillas-Vega N. Male urethritis. A review of the ideal diagnostic method. Actas UrolóGicas EspañOlas. 2020; 44: 523–528.
[4]
Sarier M, Kukul E. Classification of non-gonococcal urethritis: a review. International Urology and Nephrology. 2019; 51: 901–907.
[5]
Bartoletti R, Wagenlehner FME, Bjerklund Johansen TE, Köves B, Cai T, Tandogdu Z, et al. Management of Urethritis: is it still the Time for Empirical Antibiotic Treatments? European Urology Focus. 2019; 5: 29–35.
[6]
Jordan SJ, Toh E, Williams JA, Fortenberry LJ, LaPradd M, Ryan JD, et al. No Pathogen-Specific Sign or Symptom Predicts the Etiology of Monomicrobial Nongonococcal Urethritis in Men. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2020; 47: 329–331.
[7]
Horner PJ, Blee K, Falk L, van der Meijden W, Moi H. 2016 European guideline on the management of non-gonococcal urethritis. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 2016; 27: 928–937.
[8]
Rowlinson E, Hughes JP, Chambers LC, Lowens MS, Morgan JL, Robinson TS, et al. Incidence of Nongonococcal Urethritis in Men who have Sex with Women and Associated Risk Factors. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2021; 48: 341–346.
[9]
Taylor-Robinson D. Nongonococcal urethritis and antibiotic-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2008; 47: 1554–1555.
[10]
Lee JY, Yang JS. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma Species in Nonpregnant Female Patients in South Korea Indicate an Increasing Trend of Pristinamycin-Resistant Isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2020; 64: e01065-20.
[11]
Choi JB, Lee SJ, Lee MK, Lee SJ, Park DC, Kim HY, et al. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Ureaplasma spp. and Mycoplasma hominis in Asymptomatic Individuals in Korea. Microbial Drug Resistance. 2018; 24: 1391–1396.
[12]
Waites KB, Katz B, Schelonka RL. Mycoplasmas and Ureaplasmas as Neonatal Pathogens. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2005; 18: 757–789.
[13]
Beeton ML, Spiller OB. Antibiotic resistance among Ureaplasma spp. isolates: cause for concern? The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2017; 72: 330–337.
[14]
Zhou YH, Ma HX, Yang Y, Gu WM. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Ureaplasma spp. and Mycoplasma hominis isolated from semen samples of infertile men in Shanghai, China from 2011 to 2016. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2018; 37:729–734.
[15]
Lee MY, Kim MH, Lee WI, Kang SY, Jeon YL. Prevalence and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in Pregnant Women. Yonsei Medical Journal. 2016; 57: 1271–1275.
[16]
Zheng WW, Zhang WJ, Cui D, Nie ZC, Ding BS, Cheng JH, et al. Examination of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in 4082 Chinese patients. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 2020; 54: e10099.
[17]
Sarier M, Sepin Ozen N, Guler H, Duman I, Yüksel Y, Tekin S, et al. Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Diseases in Asymptomatic Renal Transplant Recipients. Experimental and Clinical Transplantatio. 2018. (online ahead of print)
[18]
Jang YS, Min JW, Kim YS. Positive culture rate and antimicrobial susceptibilities of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum. Obstetrics & Gynecology Science. 2019; 62: 127–133.
[19]
Kasprzykowska U, Sobieszczańska B, Duda-Madej A, Secewicz A, Nowicka J, Gościniak G. A twelve–year retrospective analysis of prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Ureaplasma spp. and Mycoplasma hominis in the province of Lower Silesia in Poland. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2018; 220: 44–49.
[20]
Wang Q, Li R, Zheng L, Shang X. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in female outpatients, 2009–2013. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection. 2016; 49: 359–362.
[21]
Pereyre S, Gonzalez P, De Barbeyrac B, Darnige A, Renaudin H, Charron A, et al. Mutations in 23S rRNA account for intrinsic resistance to macrolides in Mycoplasma hominis and Mycoplasma fermentans and for acquired resistance to macrolides in M. hominis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2002; 46: 3142–3150.
[22]
Farkas B, Ostorházi E, Pónyai K, Tóth B, Adlan E, Párducz L, et al. Frequency and antibiotic resistance of Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in genital samples of sexually active individuals. Orvosi Hetilap. 2011; 152: 1698–1702. (In Hungarian)
[23]
Pereyre S, Renaudin H, Charron A, Bébéar C, Bébéar CM. Emergence of a 23S rRNA mutation in Mycoplasma hominis associated with a loss of the intrinsic resistance to erythromycin and azithromycin. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2006; 57: 753–756.
[24]
Pereyre S, Métifiot M, Cazanave C, Renaudin H, Charron A, Bébéar C, et al. Characterisation of in vitro-selected mutants of Ureaplasma parvum resistant to macrolides and related antibiotics. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2007; 29: 207–211.
[25]
De Francesco MA, Caracciolo S, Bonfanti C, Manca N. Incidence and antibiotic susceptibility of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum isolated in Brescia, Italy, over 7 years. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy. 2013; 19: 621–627.
[26]
Dégrange S, Renaudin H, Charron A, Bébéar C, Bébéar CM. Tetracycline resistance in Ureaplasma spp. and Mycoplasma hominis: prevalence in Bordeaux, France, from 1999 to 2002 and description of two tet(M)-positive isolates of M. hominis susceptible to tetracyclines. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2008; 52: 742–744.
[27]
Mardassi BBA, Aissani N, Moalla I, Dhahri D, Dridi A, Mlik B. Evidence for the predominance of a single tet(M) gene sequence type in tetracycline-resistant Ureaplasma parvum and Mycoplasma hominis isolates from Tunisian patients. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2012; 61: 1254–1261.
[28]
Li MC, Wang F, Li F. Identification and molecular characterization of antimicrobial-resistant shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail meat products. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. 2011; 8: 489–493.
[29]
Soroka AE, Akopian TA, Taraskina AE, Baĭtsur MV, Savicheva AM, Govorun VM. Allelic polymorphism of the tem(M) determinant in Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum clinical isolates resistant to tetracyclines. Genetika. 2002; 38: 1463–1469. (In Russian)
[30]
Karabay O, Topcuoglu A, Kocoglu E, Gurel S, Gurel H, Ince NK. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of genital Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in a university hospital in Turkey. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2006; 33: 36–38.
[31]
Xie X, Zhang J. Trends in the rates of resistance of Ureaplasma urealyticum to antibiotics and identification of the mutation site in the quinolone resistance-determining region in Chinese patients. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2006; 259: 181–186.
[32]
Moi H, Blee K, Horner PJ. Management of non-gonococcal urethritis. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2015; 15: 294.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share
Back to top