IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 50 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog5001017
Open Access Original Research
Vaginal Microbiota Changes in the Vulvar Lichen Simplex Chronicus
Show Less
1 Department of Gynecology, Sichuan University West China Second University Hospital, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
2 Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education, Sichuan University West China Second University Hospital, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
*Correspondence: niuxy@scu.edu.cn (Xiaoyu Niu)
Academic Editor: Andrea Tinelli
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023, 50(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5001017
Submitted: 1 October 2022 | Revised: 13 November 2022 | Accepted: 15 November 2022 | Published: 13 January 2023
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: The vulvar lichen simplex chronicus (VLSC) is a common condition in gynecologic clinics. Though VLSC is not life-threatening, it usually causes pruritus, soreness and dispareunia, which cause general discomfort. The exact etiology of VLSC is unclear. This study was performed to explore the vaginal microbiota of VLSC and to identify the possible microbial factors in attacks. Methods: Ninety women were recruited. 45 patients with VLSC and 45 women without vulvar symptom were identified as lichen simplex chronicus (LSC) and H groups respectively. The vaginal microbiota of the two arms were compared by the V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA sequencing. Results: The LSC group had less alpha diversity than H group (p < 0.05) and the beta diversity of LSC group was also distinct from the H group. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSE) analysis indicated that genus Sneathia and family Leptotrichiaceae were discriminant taxa in LSC group. Phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states (PICRUSt) analysis found that microbial genes related to the signal transduction, metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides, transporters, nervous system, energy metabolism and others were different in the LSC and H groups. Conclusions: VLSC was associated with dysbioss of vaginal microbiota profiles compared with healthy control cases.

Keywords
vaginal microbiota
vulvar lichen simplex chronicus
16S rRNA sequencing
1. Introduction

Lichen simplex chronicus (LSC) is a common condition and it is estimated to occur in 12% of the total population. It has been found that LSC affects female and adult population more frequently than the male and young population [1]. The incidence ratio of vulvar LSC is up to 1.7% in all gynecologic practices including prepubertal girls [2]. It is also found to comprise 10–35% of the patients in vulvar clinics [3]. Histopathologically, LSC lesions have hyperkeratosis, epidermal thickening, spongiosis and acanthosis [4]. Though it is not life-threatening disease compared with gynecological tumors, the vulvar LSC usually causes pruritus, soreness and dispareunia [3], which interrupt the work, sleep, sexual function, and cause general discomfort [5].

Vulvar LSC can occur de novo in healthy vulvar tissue named idiopathic vulvar lichen simplex chronicus (VLSC) or as a secondary complication of any pruritic vulvar condition such as psoriasis, lichen sclerosus, and contact dermatitis. The idiopathic VLSC is estimated to be found in up to 75% of affected women but the exact etiology is indistinct [6]. So far, many factors have been found to be associated with idiopathic VLSC such as immune factors, genetic factors, psychological factors, environmental factors and sex hormones [7]. Chen et al. [8] found that skin microbiota could affect immunity, epigenetics and epidermal barrier of the host, and it also played an important role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory skin diseases. Vaginal microbiota changes as response to the host biochemical and immunological change and vaginal secretion flows out and may make the vulvar skin in the similar microbiological environment with vagina, so we speculate that vaginal microbiota changes may play a role in the pathophysiologic conditions in VLSC. Along with the technology development, the high-throughput sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA can be used as a mature tool for assessing microbial communities with a high phylogenetic resolution. The goal of this study is to explore more accurate qualitative and quantitative information of the vaginal microbiota in females with VLSC, and to identify the potential microbiome pathogenesis which has not been studied before.

2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Data and Sample Collection

A total of 90 women were recruited at the Gynecology Outpatient Department of Sichuan University West China Second Hospital in Chengdu between January 2017 and May 2021. Forty-five patients diagnosed with VLSC confirmed pathologically were included as the LSC group. Forty-five women with no recorded vulvar complication and vaginitis were included as the control group (H group). The excluding criteria were (1) the vaginal smear indicated vaginitis such as bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis or trichomoniasis, etc; (2) patients who had sexual intercourse within 48 hours before the visit; (3) patients received vaginal medications or douches within 48 hours before the visit; (4) pregnant women; (5) patients had taken any oral antibiotics,oral antimycotics, oral contraceptive medication or hormone replacement treatment in the past one month; (6) patients had received topical corticosteroids, topical immunomodulators, antihistamines, antidepressants or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the past one month. After obtaining informed consent, the mid-vaginal secretion samples were dipped using sterilized cotton swabs. Two sterilized swabs were collected for each sample and the swabs were put in tubes on ice until genomic DNA extractions within 3 hours. This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Sichuan University West China Second University Hospital (NO.1356) and the work has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans.

2.2 Whole Genomic DNA Extraction

The TIANamp Swab DNA kit (TIANGEN BIOTECH Beijing Co. Ltd, Beijing, China) was used to extract the whole genomic DNA of vaginal bacteria species. The swab suspensions were mixed with 20 μL proteinase K. The mixture was incubated at 56 °C for 60 min. Then, the samples were subjected to mechanical lysis by bead beating in a Fast Prep 24 machine (MPBio, Santa Ana, CA, USA) at 6 m/s for 40 s. The lysates were subjected to centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 60 s to pellet the beads and filtered using the CR2 columns. DNA was purified, and the quality of total genomic DNA was evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

2.3 DNA Amplification and Sequencing of 16S rRNA Gene Fragments

The V3-V4 variable regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene were amplified with primers 338F (ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA) and 806R (GGACTACNNGGGTWTCTAAT). The amplicon quality was visualized using gel electrophoresis. The PCR products were purified with AgencourtAMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter Co., Bria, CA, USA) and quantified using Qubit dsDNA assay kit. The concentrations were then adjusted for sequencing. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina NovaSeq6000 with two paired-end read cycles of 250 bases each (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA; OE Biotech Company; Shanghai, China)

2.4 Bioinformatic Analysis

The raw reads were deposited into the Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) database (Accession Number: CRA005753. Paired-end reads were preprocessed using Trimmomatic software (version 0.35, Usadel Lab, Aachen, Germany) to detect and cut off ambiguous bases (N). It also cut off low quality sequences with average quality score below 20 using sliding window trimming approach. After trimming, paired-end reads were assembled using FLASH software (version 1.2.11, Center for Computational Biology, Baltimore, MD, USA). Parameters of assembly were 10 bps of minimal overlapping, 200 bps of maximum overlapping and 20% of maximum mismatch rate. Sequences were performed further denoising as follows: reads with ambiguous, homologous sequences or below 200 bps were abandoned. Reads with 75% of bases above Q20 were retained and reads with chimera were detected and removed using QIIME software (version 1.8.0, Knight and Caporaso labs, Flagstaff, AZ, USA). Clean reads were subjected to primer sequences removal and clustering to generate operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using VSEARCH software (version 2.4.2, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France) with 97% similarity cutoff. The representative read of each OTU was selected using QIIME package. All representative reads were annotated and blasted against Silva database (Version 138) using RDP classifier (confidence threshold was 70%). The community structure of LSC and H groups were compared. Venn diagrams were drawn to analyze the amount of overlapped and unique OTUs in the two groups. In the alpha-diversity analysis, Shannon and inverse Simpson indices were estimated. In the beta-diversity analysis, principal co-ordinate analysis (PCoA) using binary_jaccard was performed. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSE) was performed to determine the dominant biomarkers of each group. Phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states (PICRUSt) was performed to predict the function of different vaginal microbiota. Student’s t-test was used to compare quantitative data and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results
3.1 Characteristics of Participants

The average age of the LSC and H groups was 44.89 ± 11.52 and 42.09 ± 10.3 years respectively (p > 0.05). The mean BMI of the two groups was 23.95 ± 3.03 and 22.78 ± 3.21 kg/m2 (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in marital status within the two groups.

The data volume of valid tags ranges from 9359 to 74,949, and the length of the valid tags varied from 411.97 to 430.01 bps. 4475 OTUs were identified using a cutoff of 97% sequence similarity, including 31 phyla, 600 genera, and 905 species.

3.2 Community Structure of the LSC and H Groups

At the phylum level, the Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria were the top three abundant bacterial phyla in H group. In the LSC group, the dominant three phyla were Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidota (Fig. 1A). At the genus level, the Lactobacillus and Gardnerella were the most abundant two bacterial genera in both of the two groups, with relative abundance of 64.32% and 13.64% respectively in the H group, and 64.82% and 9.36% respectively in the LSC group. Among the Lactobacillus, it was found that the Lactocillus iners. was the most abundant species. The relative abundance of Gardnerella decreased while Muribaculaceae and Streptococcus increased in the LSC group (Fig. 1B). The Venn diagram displayed that there were 2631 common OTUs of the two groups. H group had 402 unique OTUs, and LSC group had 1442 unique OTUs. The microbiota community of each group was different (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1.

Microbial community structure bar plots of the LSC and H groups. (A) The microbial community bar plots of the LSC and H groups at the phyla level. (B) The microbial community bar plots of the LSC and H groups at the genus level. (C) OTU Venn diagram. The number in the overlapped area indicates the amount of common OTUs of the two groups.

3.3 Microbiota Diversity in H and LSC Groups

The median of Shannon index of LSC group was 0.79 which was significantly less than the index of H group (1.43, p < 0.01) (Fig. 2A). The median of inverse Simpson index of LSC group was 0.24 while the index of the H group was 0.42, and there was statistical difference between the two groups (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2B). This indicated the alpha diversity of LSC group was less than the H group. The beta diversity of the two groups was compared using the principal co-ordinates analysis (PCoA) of binary_jaccard distances. The result was distinct between LSC and H groups (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2.

Alpha diversity comparison of LSC and H groups. Violin plots of the Shannon (A) and Simpson (B) index for the two groups. ‘**’ indicates p < 0.01, ‘*’ indicates p < 0.05.

Fig. 3.

PCoA analysis of the LSC and H groups. Some of the H group samples cluster separately from the LSC samples.

3.4 The Featured Taxa of LSC and H Groups

The analysis of similarity (anosim) of binary_jaccard revealed LSC group differed from H group significantly (p = 0.001). The top 5 discriminal genus with most relative abundance were Gardnerella, Atopobium, Tepidimonas, Sneathiaand and Massllia (Fig. 4). To identify the specific taxa, the LEfSE analysis was performed. Comparing with group H, family Leptotrichiaceae and genus Sneathia were discriminant taxa in group LSC (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4.

The box plot of the top 10 different genera in the LSC and H groups.

Fig. 5.

LEfSE analysis of the LSC and H groups. The rings represent the taxonomic levels in descending order, from phylum to genus. The circles in red or green represent more prevalent taxa of H or LSC groups. The diameters of the circles represent the relative abundances of the taxa.

3.5 Functional Prediction of Vaginal Microbiota in the Two Groups

To gain the function of vaginal microbiota in the etiology of VLSC, PICRUSt using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways was used to predicate the functional profile of bacterial communities. It found that in addition to the difference detected in bacterial composition and diversity, microbial genes related to the signal transduction, metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides, transporters, excretory system, nervous system, energy metabolism and many other functions were extremely enriched among the LSC group comparing with H group, while genes related to immune system, cardiovascular diseases and digestive system, etc were reduced in LSC group (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

Heatmap summarizing the predicted functional factors based on KEGG databases in the level 2.

4. Discussion

In the recent dermatopathologic view, LSC is inflammatory dermatoses [9], but the mechanism of inflammation is not clear. So far, some gynecological diseases have been found associated with gut microbiota or vaginal microbiota dysbiosis. Chandni et al. [10] summarized that gut microbes might promote endometriosis lesion formation in the state of dysbiosis through disrupting gut barrier integrity and resulting macrophage activation. Pierluigi et al. [11] also found the lower genital tract microbiome would be affected by changes in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Both vaginal microbiota and vulvar skin microbiota can influence the status of labium skin. Compared with vulvar skin microbiota, vaginal microbiota is relatively more stable. Taking these into account, we tried to screen potential etiology by studying the composition of vaginal microbiota in women with VLSC through high phylogenetic resolution sequencing in the present research.

In our study, it was found that the LSC group had less alpha microbiota diversity than H group and the beta diversity of the two groups were different. Comparing with H group, the Sneathia was the discriminant genus and increased significantly in relative abundance in LSC group. Haggerty et al. [12] found that the presence of Sneathia in bacterial vaginosis was associated with increased risk of pelvic inflammatory disease. Muzny [13] found that as the secondary colonizers, Sneathia spp. and potentially other bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria were more potent stimulators of the host-immune response to bacterial vaginosis and likely contribute to its signs and symptoms as well as its adverse outcomes. Another study [14] revealed that the presence of Prevotellaamnii and Sneathia sanguinegens was significantly associated with infection of Trichomonas vaginalis. All the findings indicated that VLSC was related to vaginal microbiota disturbance and the increased abundance of Sneathia in vagina might facilitate the secondary bacterial infection.

According to the PICRUSt analysis, it has been found that the function of the vaginal microbiota differed in the LSC and H groups. For example, genes related to folate, cysteine and methionine metabolism increased in LSC group in our study. Fan et al. [15] compared the MTHFRC677T gene polymorphism between the nonneopastic epithelial disorders of vulva and the normal control cases and indicated that VLSC patients had significantly increased frequencies of MTHFR 677TT genotype and T allele which was associated with the folic acid and homocysteine metabolism. Another study [16] investigated the changes of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) protein expression in vulva skin tissue of VLSC rats. It found that the expression of TGF-β protein in vulvar tissues of experimental group were significantly lower than that of the control group (p < 0.05), while the expression of Bcl-2 protein was higher than the control group (p < 0.05). In our study, it was also found that the genes related to apoptosis were different in the LSC and H groups. So, it could be speculated that altered vaginal microbiota may be involved in some signaling or metabolic pathways, which exert synergistic or antagonistic effects and promote the occurrence of VLSC.

So far, due to the lack of understanding of VLSC and its multifactorial nature, it is difficult to manage VLSC. Topical corticosteroids were accepted as the first line therapy and many other therapies such as topical immunomodulators, antihistamines, antidepressants, phototherapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and focused ultrasound were also accepted as adjuvant therapy, but all the methods could only relieve the symptom and had a certain recurrent rate [17]. Now, the changes of microbiota in VLSC women may give hints for disease management that the vaginal probiotics might help regaining the vaginal microbial balance and assisting in therapy.

5. Conclusions

The richness and diversity of vaginal microbiota in VLSC group is different from H group. VLSC is associated with disturbed microbiota profiles.

Availability of Data and Materials

The raw reads generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) database. [https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/] (Accession Number: CRA005753).

Author Contributions

LM took part in the data curation, formal analysis, investigation and drafting the article. YC, DW, TC, YZ and JM were involved in clinical resources. XZ, YL, QW and LD were involved in methodology. TW was responsible for methodology and project administration. XN made conceptualization, funding acquisition and final review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Sichuan University West China Second University Hospital (NO.1356) and the work has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2009100) and the foundation of Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2019YJ0044).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
Liao YH, Lin CC, Tsai PP, Shen WC, Sung FC, Kao CH. Increased risk of lichen simplex chronicus in people with anxiety disorder: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study. British Journal of Dermatology. 2014; 170: 890–894.
[2]
Wei DM, Wang P, Niu XY. Epidemiological and electrophysiological treatment of 312 vulvar dystrophy in Sichuan. Journal of Sichuan University. 2017; 48: 800–803.
[3]
van der Meijden WI, Boffa MJ, Ter Harmsel WA, Kirtschig G, Lewis FM, Moyal-Barracco M, et al. 2016 European guideline for the management of vulval conditions. The Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2017; 31: 925–941.
[4]
Fruchter R, Melnick L, Pomeranz MK. Lichenoid vulvar disease: A review. International Journal of Women’s Dermatology. 2017; 3: 58–64.
[5]
Chibnall R. Vulvar Pruritus and Lichen Simplex Chronicus. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2017; 44: 379–388.
[6]
Corazza M, Borghi A, Minghetti S, Toni G, Virgili A. Effectiveness of silk fabric underwear as an adjuvant tool in the management of vulvar lichen simplex chronicus: results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Menopause. 2015; 22: 850–856.
[7]
Feng L, Ding X, Ma L. Analysis of interrelated risk factors of nonneoplastic epithelial disorders of vulva. China Clinical Practical Medicine.2014; 5: 36–38.
[8]
Chen P, He GW, Qian JR, Zhan Y, Xiao R. Potential role of the skin microbiota in Inflammatory skin diseases. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology. 2021; 20: 400–409.
[9]
Billings SD. Common and critical inflammatory dermatoses every pathologist should know. Modern Pathology. 2020; 33:107–117.
[10]
Chandni T, Vertika S, Ramakrishna K. The gut microbiota: a double-edged sword in endometriosis. Biology of Reproduction. 2022; 107: 881–901.
[11]
Pierluigi G, Virginia F, Claudia DF, Alessandra G, Antonio M, Paolo S, et al. Microbiome and PCOS: State-of-Art and Future Aspects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021; 22: 2048–2062.
[12]
Haggerty CL, Ness RB, Totten PA, Farooq F, Tang G, Ko D, et al. Presence and Concentrations of Select Bacterial Vaginosis-Associated Bacteria are Associated with Increased Risk of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2020; 47: 344–346.
[13]
Muzny CA, Łaniewski P, Schwebke JR, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. Host–vaginal microbiota interactions in the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases. 2020; 33: 59–65.
[14]
Jarrett O, Srinivasan S, Richardson B, Fiedler T, Wallis JM, Kinuthia J, et al. Specific Vaginal Bacteria Are Associated With an Increased Risk of Trichomonas vaginalis Acquisition in Women. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2019; 220: 1503–1510.
[15]
Fan X, Chang S, Sun J. MTHFRC677T gene polymorphism in patients with nonneoplastic epithelial disorders of vulva. Journal of Chongqing Medical University. 2019; 44: 1049–1053.
[16]
Liu Y, Fan Y, Li C. Inhibitory effect of focused ultrasound on vulvar skin fibrosis in lichen simplex chronicus rats and its mechanism. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine. 2020; 22: 561–565.
[17]
Juarez MC, Kwatra SG. A systematic review of evidence based treatments for lichen simplex chronicus. Journal of Dermatological Treatment. 2019; 6: 1–9.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share
Back to top