IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 49 / Issue 8 / DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog4908178
Open Access Case Report
A case report of uterine rupture after repeated conservative treatment for adenomyosis
Show Less
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, 01830 Seoul, Republic of Korea
2 Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Uijeongbu St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, 11765 Seoul, Republic of Korea
*Correspondence: (Kyong Shil Im)
Academic Editor: Michael H. Dahan
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 49(8), 178;
Submitted: 4 October 2021 | Revised: 7 November 2021 | Accepted: 11 November 2021 | Published: 28 July 2022
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.

Background: Among the pregnancy complications after an adenomyomectomy, uterine rupture is fatal for both the mother and baby. There have been a few reports of uterine rupture during pregnancy related to adenomyosis or adenomyomectomy. Case: A 34-year-old nulliparous woman with abdominal discomfort at 27 weeks of gestation visited our clinic. She had a history of complex treatments for symptom relief and fertility for uterine adenomyosis, which included repeat adenomyomectomies and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Three months after her last adenomyomectomy, she conceived by in vitro fertilization. During antenatal care at our clinic at 27 weeks of gestation, the results of an examination for abdominal discomfort with focal tenderness on the lower abdomen was suspicious for uterine rupture and fetal distress. An emergency cesarean delivery was performed. The mother’s uterus was repaired without significant postoperative complications and the neonate was admitted to the intensive care unit for prematurity care and presently is well. Conclusions: During antenatal care of a pregnant woman with a history of adenomyosis treatment, heightened awareness of catastrophic pregnancy-related complications should be maintained to obtain the best maternal and fetal outcomes.

Conservative surgery
Uterine rupture
1. Introduction

Uterus sparing technique for adenomyosis has become widely performed with advances in surgical techniques, without severe postoperative complications and studies have reported that it is effective for symptom control [1, 2, 3]. However, there is little data on the definitive relationship between conservative surgical treatment and pregnancy complications after an adenomyomectomy such as contractility of the uterus, placental abnormalities or effects on the fetus. The main concern of these complications is uterine rupture, which is one of the catastrophic complications that can occur during pregnancy after the surgery because the excised amount of myometrial tissue and scars can affect the elasticity of the myometrium during pregnancy. Additionally, there is no consensus on antenatal care or how to manage women with a history of uterine surgery, especially in cases of conservative surgery for adenomyosis, because there are few reports of antenatal, intra- or postpartum care and fetal outcomes in pregnant women after an adenomyomectomy.

Among the pregnancy complications after an adenomyomectomy, uterine rupture is fatal for both the mother and baby. There have been a few reports of uterine rupture during pregnancy related to adenomyosis or adenomyomectomy [4, 5, 6]. The mechanism of uterine rupture in pregnant women after adenomyomectomies is unknown and not well explained.

To avoid the serious and fatal complications of pregnancy related to an adenomyomectomy, the collection and analysis of fatal uterine ruptures are needed. We report our case of uterine rupture in a pregnant woman after complex treatments for uterine adenomyosis.

2. Case report

This case was approved by the institutional review board of Nowon Eulji Medical Center of Eulji University of Korea. The patient provided informed consent for the publication of her clinical and imaging data. A 34-year-old nulliparous woman with abdominal discomfort at 27 weeks of gestation visited our clinic. She had a history of adenomyosis refractory to the medical treatment and recieved high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment eight years ago and robotic adenomyomectomy at another hospital two years ago due to remaining uterine adenomyosis after HIFU treatment. The patient received in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET), which resulted in a missed abortion. Both dilatation and curettage procedures for missed conception tissues at other hospitals failed due to the distorted passage of the endometrial cavity, which caused continuous uterine bleeding.

At that time, to resolve both the missed abortion and recurrent adenomyosis in the patient with a strong desire to have a baby, we decided to perform our adenomyomectomy technique with transient occlusion of the uterine arteries (TOUA) [7, 8]. After incision was made, the bilateral uterine arteries were isolated and reversible clamps were applied for bleeding control during excising the adenomyosis and clamps were removed after suturing of the uterus. A longitudinal incision was made to the uterus until the endometrium was exposed, showing the remnants of conception adhered to the endometrium and invasion of the myometrium (Fig. 1). After excision of the conception tissue and the invaded myometrium, an adenomyotic lesion was excised between the endometrium and the serosa, conserving the lateral blood flow to the uterus. The weight of the excised adenomyosis was 220 g and conception tissue was 25 g. Uteroplasty was performed along the previous incision site.

Fig. 1.

Image of the specimen during surgery. (a) Conception tissue inside the uterus (arrow) with a distorted uterine cavity. (b) Excised specimen of conceptual tissue.

After three months of gonadotropin-releasing hormone injections, the patient tried in vitro fertilization at the time of four months after the surgery and succeeded in conceiving. In the first trimester, screening was done by two sequential serum tests at 11 and 16 weeks of gestation. There were no abnormal findings on level II ultrasonography in the second trimester.

The patient visited the hospital because of abdominal discomfort without regular uterine contractions and described focal tenderness on her right side at 27 weeks of gestation. Fetal heartbeat monitoring showed moderate variability over an hour. However, during continuous monitoring, the pain was aggravated and fetal variability became continuous with recurrent sharp deceleration (Fig. 2). On the ultrasonogram of the tender area, focal fluid collection was found outside the myometrium (Fig. 3). Under the impression of uterine wall dehiscence or rupture, an emergency cesarean delivery was performed. A 5 × 7 cm area of dehiscence at the right anterior portion of the uterine wall was noted after the peritoneum was opened and the amniotic membrane was exposed through the window of the uterine wall without membrane rupture. Slight blood-tinged fluid was detected around the ruptured site and adhesion was also found between the posterior peritoneum and the uterus. However, anterior wall was almost clear without adhesion and ruptured site of the uterus was extended by using bandage scissors and the fetus was delivered through that. After delivery of the baby, the uterus was conserved.

Fig. 2.

Fetal heartbeat monitoring sheet. Fetal heartbeat monitoring sheet at the time emergency cesarean delivery was decided.

Fig. 3.

Transabdominal sonogram of the disrupted uterine wall. Transabdominal sonogram of the disrupted uterine wall with fluid collection (arrow) where the patient had focal tenderness.

The baby weighed 1.1 kg at birth and intubation was needed. Three cycles of surfactant were used because of respiratory distress syndrome. After a month, the tracheal tube was extubated and O2 saturation provided by an oxygen hood was in the normal range. Serial echography was performed and there was no definite lesion in the regular follow-up brain ultrasonogram.

3. Discussion

Uterine rupture is one of the catastrophic complications of pregnancy. The risk of rupture could be related to prior uterine surgery. Though there have been several reports of uterine ruptures during pregnancy after conservative surgery for adenomyosis, the definitive mechanism and cause of uterine rupture during pregnancy have not been well elucidated. Recently, more interest in conservative surgery for uterine adenomyosis as a technique to preserve fertility has been shown and the rates of this type of surgery have gradually increased. Because adenomyomectomy is the latest procedure, there is no specific guidelines for antenatal care for a pregnancy after an adenomyomectomy and there is not much information on how to avoid this catastrophic complication.

Our practice to transiently occlude the uterine arteries can prevent overuse of electrocoagulation that induces thermal damage to the myometrium. Because irreversible myometrial damage could risk expanding the failure point and the dehiscence point of the uterus during pregnancy, we use a cold knife for cutting and excision. For bleeding control, we used bipolar type electrocautery for small vessels and sutures with minimal electrocauterization. Also, restoring the flow to the transiently occluded uterine arteries maintained the original vascular architecture in the uterus and minimized the ischemic area due to the operative interruption of uterine blood flow. We previously reported the successful outcome of a twin pregnancy after a TOUA adenomyomectomy without uterine rupture or dehiscence [1, 2].

However, in this case, the patient had various risk factors because of the previous surgical treatment and HIFU at another hospital that could destroy the myometrial structure. At her last adenomyomectomy at our clinic, despite recurrent trials at two different hospitals, abortus could not be removed by an evacuation and curettage procedure due to the deformed uterus and surgery revealed the destroyed and grossly scarred myometrium.

HIFU was introduced in China in the 1990s by concentrating ultrasound waves at the desired location using an external source of energy to induce thermal ablation as a noninvasive therapeutic strategy [9]. HIFU has become a uterine-sparing option for the treatment of leiomyomas and has also recently been applied to the treatment of adenomyosis [10, 11]. However, there are concerns for future fertility because of damage to the adjacent endometrial lining and serosa when the energy accumulating within the lesion is excessive or the treatment duration is prolonged [12].

Otsubo et al. [3] reported the relationship between uterine wall thickness and uterine rupture during the pregnancy of the women with a history of an adenomyomectomy. In the present case, we measured the patient’s uterine wall thickness by ultrasonography at each visit. The mean wall thickness of the anterior uterine wall was 7 mm and the thinnest point was 5 mm at her last visit at 25 weeks of gestation. To prevent spontaneous rupture without labor, shorter follow-up intervals for uterine environment evaluation, especially measuring the wall-thickness, could be helpful during the second and third trimester. Also, because the posterior wall of the uterus cannot be measured well by ultrasonography due to limitations of depth, MRI without gadolinium enhancement can be an option in patients with a high risk of uterine rupture during pregnancy. Further studies need to be conducted on measurement methods, measuring points, and the ranges of calculations for risk evaluation.

In addition to revise surgical technique to maintain uterine structure, particular attention is needed to contemplate how to manage pregnant women who have history of adenomyomectomy to avoid pregnancy complications. To date, among the 30 deliveries of pregnancies in patients who received TOUA adenomyomectomies at our clinic, this was the first report of uterine rupture. Usually, we use 3 months of GnRH agonist to prevent menstruation flow and it makes convalescence period. The patients who received adenomyomectomy have experience of ineffective hormonal treatments or severe side effects to the medical treatments so that they are already exhausted for further treatments. In this case the patient was be pregnant four months after the surgery. Regarding her past history of uterine procedures, it might be considered a short interval. There could be controversies of adequate conception intervals after adenomyomectomy. In case of uterine myomectomy, some studies suggested a period between 2 and 12 weeks, 12 months or others claimed that there is no safe interval [13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. What we learned from this case is that longer interval of pregnancy would be safer.

How to deal with risks is more important than risk assessment. To avoid a catastrophic rupture, we suggest the close measuring of the uterine wall, especially at the surgical site of the uterus, with short follow-up intervals during the late second and third trimesters of pregnancy in women after an adenomyomectomy. This monitoring enables us to identify the exact time for a safe delivery. Also, when preparing childbearing after adenomyomectomy, precise counseling should be provided about risk of uterine rupture and postoperative contraception interval.

Furthermore, to reduce the risks of complications in pregnant women after an adenomyomectomy, more cases of pregnancy outcomes and complications related to adenomyomectomies should be collected and analyzed in the future.

Author contributions

JYK written the manuscript. KSI reviewed and made correction for the manuscript to submit. YSK performed the research procedures and designed the study. HJ and YL provided help for the clinical experiments. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This case was approved by the institutional review board of Nowon Eulji Medical Center of Eulji University of Korea (EMCS 2019-08-015). The patient provided informed consent for the publication of her clinical and imaging data.


Not applicable.


This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Kwack JY, Jeon SB, Kim K, Lee SJ, Kwon YS. Monochorionic twin delivery after conservative surgical treatment of a patient with severe diffuse uterine adenomyosis without uterine rupture. Obstetrics and Gynecology Science. 2016; 59: 311–315.
Kwack JY, Im KS, Kwon YS. Conservative surgery of uterine adenomyosis via laparoscopic versus laparotomic approach in a single institution. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2018; 44: 1268–1273.
Otsubo Y, Nishida M, Arai Y, Ichikawa R, Taneichi A, Sakanaka M. Association of uterine wall thickness with pregnancy outcome following uterine-sparing surgery for diffuse uterine adenomyosis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2016; 56: 88–91.
Nikolaou M, Kourea HP, Antonopoulos K, Geronatsiou K, Adonakis G, Decavalas G. Spontaneous uterine rupture in a primigravid woman in the early third trimester attributed to adenomyosis: a case report and review of the literature. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2013; 39: 727–732.
Morimatsu Y, Matsubara S, Higashiyama N, Kuwata T, Ohkuchi A, Izumi A, et al. Uterine rupture during pregnancy soon after a laparoscopic adenomyomectomy. Reproductive Medicine and Biology. 2007; 6: 175–177.
Wada S, Kudo M, Minakami H. Spontaneous uterine rupture of a twin pregnancy after a laparoscopic adenomyomectomy: a case report. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2006; 13: 166–168.
Kwon YS, Roh HJ, Ahn JW, Lee SH, Im KS. Conservative adenomyomectomy with transient occlusion of uterine arteries for diffuse uterine adenomyosis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2015; 41: 938–945.
Kwack JY, Kwon YS. Conservative surgery of diffuse adenomyosis with TOUA: Single surgeon experience of one hundred sixteen cases and report of fertility outcomes. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2018; 34: 290–294.
Cheung VYT. High-intensity focused ultrasound therapy. Best Practice and Research in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2018; 46: 74–83.
Long L, Chen J, Xiong Y, Zou M, Deng Y, Chen L, et al. Efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for adenomyosis therapy and sexual life quality. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine. 2015; 8: 11701–11707.
Marques ALS, Andres MP, Kho RM, Abrão MS. Is High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Effective for the Treatment of Adenomyosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2020; 27: 332–343.
Ou KY, Jeng CJ, Long CY, Chuang L. Re: Pregnancy outcomes in patients with uterine fibroids treated with ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound: is the noninvasive nature of HIFU ablation for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis setting patients up for future operative delivery? BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2018; 125: 762–763.
Zhang Y, Hua KQ. Patients’ age, myoma size, myoma location, and interval between myomectomy and pregnancy may influence the pregnancy rate and live birth rate after myomectomy. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A. 2014; 24: 95–99.
Tian Y, Long T, Dai Y. Pregnancy outcomes following different surgical approaches of myomectomy. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. 2015; 41: 350–357.
Tsuji S, Takahashi K, Imaoka I, Sugimura K, Miyazaki K, Noda Y. MRI evaluation of the uterine structure after myomectomy. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 2006; 61: 106–110.
Chang WC, Chang DY, Huang SC, Shih JC, Hsu WC, Chen SY, et al. Use of three-dimensional ultrasonography in the evaluation of uterine perfusion and healing after laparoscopic myomectomy. Fertility and Sterility. 2009; 92: 1110–1115.
Koo YJ, Lee JK, Lee YK, Kwak DW, Lee IH, Lim KT, et al. Pregnancy Outcomes and Risk Factors for Uterine Rupture after Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2015; 22: 1022–1028.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Back to top