IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 49 / Issue 10 / DOI: 10.31083/j.ceog4910224
Open Access Systematic Review
Urinary Incontinence after Iatrogenic Bladder Injury during Cesarean Section. A Ten-Year Single-Center Retrospective Analysis and Review of the Literature
Show Less
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milano, 20122 Milano, Italy
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo University Hospital, 20142 Milano, Italy
*Correspondence: stefano.manodoro@gmail.com (Stefano Manodoro)
Academic Editor: Ugo Indraccolo
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022, 49(10), 224; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog4910224
Submitted: 24 April 2022 | Revised: 26 July 2022 | Accepted: 1 August 2022 | Published: 21 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Delivery and Pelvic Floor Disorders)
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Bladder injuries during caesarean delivery are rare but serious intraoperative complications. Short-term effects of bladder injuries include prolonged catheterization and urinary infections. Nevertheless, there is a lack of data regarding long-term adverse outcomes, such as lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Our aim is to retrospectively analyze the long-term prevalence of urinary incontinence after iatrogenic bladder injury occurring during caesarean delivery in a singleton first-level Obstetric Department. Moreover, with a systematic review we aimed to define on urinary symptoms, primarily urinary incontinence. Methods: All patients who underwent caesarean delivery with bladder injuries in our first-level obstetrics department between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2020 were included and reached for a telephone interview during 2021. Moreover, a systematic literature review was conducted up to November 28, 2021. Data selection and extraction were conducted in accordance with PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome and Study design) criteria for study selection, using a piloted form specifically designed for capturing information on the study and characteristics. Results: Throughout the obstetrics database of our department, we identified 16 patients with iatrogenic bladder injury in 3725 caesarean delivery, with an overall incidence of 0.43%. Ten patients out of 16 (63%) attended the interview and four of them (40%) developed urinary incontinence. Three studies met the criteria for the systematic review. The incidence of bladder injuries varied from 0.05 to 0.47%. The incidence of urinary incontinence ranged from 4.9 to 37.5%, regardless the type of incontinence with no information about any treatment need. Conclusions: The incidence of bladder injuries associated with caesarean delivery in our population was similar to levels reported in the literature. Even if out of only three papers, the incidence of urinary incontinence resulted in a wide range among authors. In conclusion, urinary incontinence seems to be related to iatrogenic bladder injury during caesarean section, but, due to the lack of additional data, more studies are needed to precisely define the causality link.

Keywords
urinary incontinence
bladder injury
caesarean delivery
1. Introduction

Caesarean delivery (CD) is the most common obstetric surgical procedure and the most frequent abdominal surgery performed worldwide. One-third of women in the United States deliver by caesarean section [1]. In 2020 the incidence of CD in Italy was 31.2% (CeDAP, Italian Birth Assistance Certificate 2020), varying from 19.6% in the autonomous province of Trento to 50% in the region Campania.

In the United States, the incidence of repeated caesarean delivery is about 86.7%, and only 13.3% of women choose to deliver with vaginal birth after Caesarean section [2].

A great number of studies focused on short-term complications and benefits of Caesarean section to improve the clinical outcomes [3]. CD is related to perioperative complications for both the mother and the newborn. Intra-operative complications include: infections, bladder, bowel and ureter injuries, anesthesia-related morbidities, and hemorrhage. Immediate and late postoperative complications include adhesion-formation, thromboembolism, and chronic pelvic pain. Risks for subsequent pregnancies are uterine rupture and pathological anomalies of placentation. Bladder injuries are rare but serious intraoperative complications [4].

The incidence of iatrogenic bladder injury during CD varies from 0.0016% up to 0.94% [5]. Risks factors include: emergency and/or repeated CD, adhesions – primarily adhesions between the bladder and lower uterine segment -, uterine rupture, and attempted vaginal birth after CD [6]. During primary CD the incidence of bladder injury is about 0.2%, while in case of repeated CD is about 0.6% [5] and the higher the number of previous caesarean deliveries the higher is the risk of iatrogenic bladder complications. Short-term effects of bladder injuries include extended operation time, prolonged catheterization, and urinary infections.

Nevertheless, there is a lack of data regarding long-term adverse outcome following bladder injuries during CD and their consequences on lower urinary tract dysfunctions (LUTDs).

Urinary incontinence is defined as the complaint of any involuntary loss of urine and is the predominant urinary dysfunction reported by women.

Data about urinary incontinence in patients who had run into bladder injuries during CD is scarce. The few existing studies report a prevalence varying from 8.5% up to 10.5% [7].

We retrospectively analyzed the long-term prevalence of urinary incontinence after iatrogenic bladder injury occurring during CD in a singleton first-level Obstetric Department. Moreover, we reported the results of a systematic review of literature on urinary symptoms—primarily urinary incontinence—associated with bladder injury during Caesarean Delivery.

2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Retrospective Analysis

We reported a retrospective analysis of data collected in our first level Obstetrics Department with approximately 1200 deliveries per year, in a University Hospital in Milan, Italy.

All records of women undergoing CD between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2020 were screened.

Data were collected throughout the electronic clinical database of our Department, which comprehend data about patients’ history, pregnancy and delivery, obstetric outcome, and any complications.

Only patients who gave birth with cesarean section (either elective or emergent) were analyzed. Records in which iatrogenic bladder injury had been reported, were selected as study population, and patients were contacted for a telephone interview during 2021.

During the interviews, patients were asked to answer questions from the Italian validation of the International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaire Short-Form (ICIQ-SF) to investigate frequency, severity and the impact of incontinence on their quality of life. The board of the San Paolo hospital department of health sciences approved the study protocol. Data were collected anonymously and reported at aggregate level according to Italian law.

Data were entered into the database by one author and double-checked by one other author. Descriptive statistics were reported as absolute numbers with percentages for categorical variables and as median for continuous ones.

2.2 Systematic Review

To identify a suitable corpus of relevant studies for the review, we performed a systematic literature search on PubMed, Scopus, International Scientific Indexing (ISI), Web of Science, Cochrane up to November 28, 2021 using a combination of keywords and text words represented by “Caesarean” and “bladder injury”, “bladder damage”, “urinary scar”, and “incontinence”, “urinary symptoms”. The systematic search of literature provided a total of 61 results. Fig. 1 illustrates the review process. We excluded 7 duplicates.

Fig. 1.

Flowchart to illustrate the review process.

Titles and abstracts were screened by two reviewers (M.C. and S.M.), and 48 results were not relevant for the review according to this screening. We consider only papers published after 1994 in English language. We also performed a manual search to include additional relevant articles, using the reference lists of key articles. Once identified, full texts of seven records recommended by reviewers were analyzed independently by the same two reviewers and assessed for inclusion in the systematic review. Four out of seven results were excluded because they did not address the research question. Three studies, published from 2017 until November 2021, were incorporated in the review: two of them are case series, and one is a retrospective study on 106 patients.

The systematic review was conducted and reported according to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [8].

Data selection and extraction were conducted in accordance with PICOS (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, study type) using a piloted form specifically designed for capturing information on study and characteristics. Data were extracted independently by 2 authors to ensure accuracy and consistency.

3. Results
3.1 Retrospective Analysis

Throughout the obstetrics database of our Department we screened 3725 caesarean deliveries performed from 1st January 2010 until 31st December 2020. We identified 16 patients with iatrogenic bladder injury, with an overall incidence of 0.43%.

The mean age of patients at the time of CD was 33 years. Six patients (36%) were overweight, 3 (18%) were obese and 7 (46%) had a normal BMI. In 3 patients (18%) it was performed a primary CD, while 13 (82%) women had a repeated CD. No patient had a recurrence of bladder injury during repeated CD. Two-thirds of bladder injuries (11 patients—69%) occurred during elective surgery and 5 (31%) during emergent CD (Tables 1,2).

Table 1.Characteristics of the population.
Characteristics n
Number of patients with bladder injury 16/3725
Incidence of Bladder Injuries 0.43%
Mean age 33
BMI
< 24.9 6 (36%)
25–30 3 (18%)
> 30 7 (46%)
Caesarean Delivery
Primary CD 3 (18%)
Repeated CD 13 (82%)
Elective CD 11 (69%)
Emergent CD 5 (31%)
CD in labour 2 (40%)
Table 2.Number of previous CD.
Previous CD n (%)
Repeated CD 13/16 (81%)
One previous CD 6/13 (46%)
Two previous CDs 6/13 (46%)
Three previous CDs 1/13 (8%)

None of the bladder injuries occurred during a complementary hysterectomy for placenta accreta.

All injuries had been recognized intraoperatively and promptly managed by an expert operator. The damage had been repaired with two layers running 3–0 delayed absorbable suture: the first layer comprising the bladder mucosa, the second one comprising the submucosa and muscular layer. Patients were dismissed with indwell urinary catheter which was removed 10 days after surgery.

Ten patients out of 16 (63%) attended the interview. Six patients were dropped out at follow-up because it was not possible to reach them by phone. The mean ICI-SF score was 3.4. Six patients out of ten (60%) did not develop any form of urinary incontinence, 3 (30%) reported mild incontinence (ICIQ-SF score 3, 9, 9) and 1 (10%) severe incontinence (ICIQ-SF score 13). In patients with incontinence, 3 cases of stress urinary incontinence and 1 case of overactive bladder syndrome with urge incontinence were reported (Table 3).

Table 3.Urinary incontinence in the analyzed population.
Type of urinary incontinence n (%)
UI incidence 4 (40%)
URGE incontinence 1 (10%)
Stress incontinence 3 (30%)
3.2 Systematic Review

Our systematic search included three studies with a total of 106 patients. The median age of patients is 34 years old (range 28.9–35.5 years). The incidence of bladder injuries varies from 0.05% to 0.47%. In the series proposed by Crocetto, the incidence of bladder injury was 17%, but all women underwent elective caesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta.

The rate of repeated CD was higher than the number of primary CD both for the paper by Naicker and the one by Salaman, respectively 88.2% and 90.1%. Nevertheless, the incidence of emergent surgery was 76.5% (13 patients) for the former and 39.5% (32 patients) for the latter.

In patients falling into bladder injury during caesarean section with no hysterectomy.

Authors reported an incidence of urinary incontinence of 4.9–11.7%, regardless the type of incontinence and with no information about any need for treatment. In the series of patients with placenta accreta who underwent hysterectomy, the incidence of urinary incontinence was 37.5% (Table 4).

Table 4.Results of the systematic review.
First author Year Country Study design Patients N Median age Incidence of bladder injuries (%) Primary CD Repeated CD Elective CD Emergent CD UI incidence
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
S. Naicker 2020 South Africa CS 17 28.9 0.05 2 (11.8) 15 (88.2) 4 (23.4) 13 (76.5) 2 (11.8)
L. Salaman 2017 Israel CS 81 35.5 0.47 8 (9.9) 73 (90.1) 49 (60.5) 32 (39.5) 4 (4.9)
TOTAL 98 34.36 10 (10.2) 88 (89.8) 53 (54.1) 45 (45.9) 6 (6.1)
CS, case series
4. Discussion

Urinary incontinence is defined as any complaint of involuntary loss of urine [9]. This condition has a considerable effect on an individual quality of life. By literature, the prevalence of any form of urinary incontinence in women is in the range of 25–45% [10]. Stress incontinence and urge incontinence often coexist as a combination of symptoms named mixed urinary incontinence. Beyond age and hereditary predisposition, many risks factor associated with the development of urinary incontinence are related to the obstetric history of the patient, especially parity and delivery mode [10].

Iatrogenic bladder injury is a rare intraoperative complication occurring during Caesarean Delivery.

The role of iatrogenic bladder injury in the development of female urinary incontinence is an understudied issue, probably due to the extremely low incidence and the need for large population database.

With a single center retrospective analysis we outlined the epidemiological aspects of this clinical condition.

In our population the incidence of bladder injuries associated with CD was 0.43%, in accordance with data reported by literature (0.05–0.47%) [6, 11]. Most cases occurred in repeated CDs and, unexpectedly, during elective CD. This can be explained by the fact that the majority of repeated CDs are planned and this can be a critical aspect when the patients had undergone more than one previous CD.

Since this iatrogenic condition is a rare and underreported complication, there is a lack of data in the literature. Therefore, the number of studies included is, of necessity, very small, with only three papers satisfying the inclusion criteria.

In the paper by Crocetto the incidence raised up to 17%, but, in this series, all patients were admitted to Cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta, which is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Moreover, in extreme cases, the placenta reaches the uterine serosa or even invades the bladder wall with a higher risk of injuries or unavoidable need to open the bladder to remove the placenta and uterus [12]. In our series no injury occurred during a complementary hysterectomy for placenta accreta. This can be related to the high attention paid in our department to these cases in which the risk of bladder injury is frequent. For this reason, most of the time these cases are ruled out by experienced surgeons. Repeated caesarean delivery can be outlined as the main risk factor for bladder injury. Previous surgery is—in fact—the most frequent cause of adhesion which can make more insidious the opening of the peritoneum or even more the vesical-uterine pouch running easily into the wrong plane [13]. This can provoke the thinning of a fibrous scar-bladder wall until a full-thickness injury occurs. In our data, we had 81% of repeated CD with a prevalence of one or two repeated CDs, in accordance with the results found in the literature. The incidence of repeated CD was 88 and 90%, in the series with no Placenta Accreta cases. When the presence of a risk for fetal wellbeing requires to perform an emergent caesarean delivery in a very short time, the combination of the two conditions (repeated CD and the need for a short operative time) act as a multiplicative factor. Even if our review includes only three papers, the incidence of UI is very different among authors. In the series of patients with placenta accreta by Crocetto, it was estimated as high as 37.5%, with the majority of them affected by mixed urinary incontinence. While in the other series it was estimated between 4.9 and 11.8%. The Authors did not report any detail about the type of incontinence. None of them reported the time lapse between CD and the rising of urinary symptoms. In our retrospective analysis, urinary incontinence after bladder injury is reported in 40% of patients, which is much more frequent than the other studies in the literature. Most of our patients (75%) developed stress urinary incontinence, while 15% reported “wet overactive bladder” symptoms.

Strengths of this study include the specific topic of the systematic review and the large single-centre database screened for the retrospective analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review analyzing the incidence of urinary incontinence associated with bladder injuries during cesarean delivery. In a current trend of progressive increase of cesarean section rate worldwide, it is of paramount importance to have information for complications associated with this type of surgery. This is even more relevant when clinicians need to counsel a woman for repeated CD. Limitations of the study are related to the small number of studies included in the literature review. Moreover, due to the high rate of patients lost at follow-up of our population, we are aware that the precise number for the incidence may vary within a confidence interval.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, urinary incontinence may be related to iatrogenic bladder injury during cesarean section. Therefore, pelvic floor muscle training programs in a view of prevention should be taken into high consideration for these patients [14].

Abbreviations

CD, cesarean delivery; UI, urinary incontinence.

Author Contributions

MC—project design, data analysis, manuscript editing and review; SM—project design, data analysis, manuscript editing and review; SB—project design, data analysis, manuscript editing and review; AMM—manuscript editing and review. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. SM and AMM are serving as Editorial Board members and Guest Editors of this journal. We declare that SM and AMM had no involvement in the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to UI.

References
[1]
Antoine C, Young BK. Cesarean section one hundred years 1920–2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2021; 49: 5–16.
[2]
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK. Births in the United States, 2018. NCHS Data Brief. 2019; 1–8.
[3]
Chill HH, Karavani G, Reuveni-Salzman A, Lipschuetz M, Shimonovitz T, Cohen N, et al. Urinary bladder injury during cesarean delivery: risk factors and the role of retrograde bladder filling. International Urogiynecology Journal. 2021; 32: 1801–1806.
[4]
Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and Risks of Elective Cesarean Section. Deutsches Arzteblatt International. 2015; 112: 489–495.
[5]
Phipps MG, Watabe B, Clemons JL, Weitzen S, Myers DL. Risk Factors for Bladder Injury During Cesarean Delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005; 105: 156–160.
[6]
Salman L, Aharony S, Shmueli A, Wiznitzer A, Chen R, Gabbay-Benziv R. Urinary bladder injury during cesarean delivery: Maternal outcome from a contemporary large case series. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2017; 213: 26–30.
[7]
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An international urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2010; 29: 4–20.
[8]
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine. 2009; 6: e1000097.
[9]
Hu JS, Pierre EF. Urinary Incontinence in Women: Evaluation and Management. American Family Physician. 2019; 100: 339–348.
[10]
Aoki Y, Brown HW, Brubaker L, Cornu JN, Daly JO, Cartwright R. Urinary incontinence in women. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2017; 3: 17042.
[11]
Naicker S, Naidoo TD, Moodley J. Obstetric-associated lower urinary tract injuries: a case series from a tertiary centre in a low-resource setting. Case Reports in Women’S Health. 2020; 27: e00218.
[12]
Crocetto F, Saccone G, Raffone A, Travaglino A, Gragnano E, Bada M, et al. Urinary Incontinence after Planned Cesarean Hysterectomy for Placenta Accreta. Urologia Internationalis. 2021; 105: 1099–1103.
[13]
Korniluk A, Kosiński P, Wielgoś M. Intraoperative damage to the urinary bladder during cesarean section - literature review. Ginekologia Polska. 2017; 88: 161–165.
[14]
Shuhao D, Yicheng Z, Quan J, Yuan Z. Evaluation of four-dimensional ultrasound for diagnosis of female pelvic floor dysfunction and prognosis. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020; 47: 950–954.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Share
Back to top