IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 39 / Issue 1 / pii/1630475474576-1851091136

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology (CEOG) is published by IMR Press from Volume 47 Issue 1 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with S.O.G.

Editorial
Physicians should be more open-minded about performing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in women with diminished oocyte reserve and consider the couple’s wishes and desires
Show Less
1 The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Camden, NJ (USA)
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 39(1), 5–10;
Published: 10 March 2012
Abstract

Purpose: By presenting anecdotal cases of women who conceived with IVF-ET despite very poor odds, this editorial hopes to make some of the infertility specialists to be more optimistic about the prognosis for pregnancy in women with diminished oocyte reserve. Methods: Description of Case Report where despite poor odds the couples elected to still attempt IVF-ET which appeared to be needed for conception to be possible. Results: Five cases are presented where the couple was willing to deplete their financial resources to achieve a pregnancy with IVF-ET using their own gametes and were eventually successful. Conclusions: Physicians should restrain from being dogmatic and present all options to patients not merely the physicians’ preference. It is embarrassing for a physician to insist that successful pregnancy is impossible only for the patient to prove that physician wrong. After receiving proper data patients should be allowed greater input into their treatment decision.
Keywords
Diminished oocyte reserve
Finances
Patients’ rights
In vitro fertilization
Share
Back to top