IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 38 / Issue 4 / pii/1630543031778-764586331

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology (CEOG) is published by IMR Press from Volume 47 Issue 1 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with S.O.G.

Original Research
Speculum retention during embryo transfer does not improve pregnancy rates following embryo transfer - a randomized study
Show Less
1 The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Camden, NJ (USA)
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 38(4), 333–334;
Published: 10 December 2011
Abstract

Purpose: To corroborate or refute two previous studies that suggested that a technique using prolonged speculum retention may improve pregnancy rates per embryo transfer. Methods: Women undergoing day 3 embryo transfer were randomly assigned to the con-ventional transfer teehnique vs the speculum retention technique. The speculum retention technique involves following the embryo transfer not to withdraw the speculum but to loosen the screw in order to exert gentle pressure on the portiovaginalis of the cervix and leave it in for seven minutes. Results: Clinical and viable pregnancy rates following the standard technique were 48.9% and 44.4%,respectively, vs 43.8% and 37.5% with the speculum retention technique. The implantation rates were also similar - 37.6% vs 37.5%. Conclusions: This study was unable to corroborate the benefit of speculum retention in order to improve pregnancy rates per transfer.
Keywords
Speculum retention
Embryo expulsion
Embryo transfer
Share
Back to top