IMR Press / CEOG / Volume 27 / Issue 3-4 / pii/2000049

Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology (CEOG) is published by IMR Press from Volume 47 Issue 1 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher on a subscription basis, and they are hosted by IMR Press on imrpress.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with S.O.G.

Original Research

Comparable implantation rates with fresh vs frozen embryo transfer suggests that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation has an adverse effect on conception outcome

Show Less
1 The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Camden, New Jersey (USA)
Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000, 27(3-4), 173–175;
Published: 10 September 2000
Abstract

Purpose: A retrospective comparison of fresh vs frozen embryo pregnancy rates. Methods: All frozen embryos transferred used in the analysis including deselected embryos from the oocyte retrieval cycle, and twice-frozen embryos. Results: Pregnancy and implantation rates following fresh or frozen embryo transfers were similar. Conclusion: The similar outcomes despite the obvious disadvantages for the frozen-thawed embryo suggests that some other factor reduces the chance of embryo implantation on oocyte-retrieval cycles. An adverse affect of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on the uterine environment is a strong possibility.

Keywords
Frozen Embryo Transfer
Deselection
Ovarian hyperstimulation
Share
Back to top