Academic Editor

Article Metrics

  • Fig. 1.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 2.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 3.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 4.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Information

  • Download

  • Contents

Abstract

Background:

Uterine fibroids (UF) is the most common benign tumour of the female reproductive system. We investigated the joint contribution of genome-wide association studies (GWAS)-significant loci and environment-associated risk factors to the UF risk, along with epistatic interactions between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

Methods:

DNA samples from 737 hospitalised patients with UF and 451 controls were genotyped using probe-based PCR for seven common GWAS SNPs: rs117245733 LINC00598, rs547025 SIRT3, rs2456181 ZNF346, rs7907606 STN1, SLK, rs58415480 SYNE1, rs7986407 FOXO1, and rs72709458 TERT.

Results:

We observed an association between rs547025 SIRT3 and the decreased risk of UF in overall group (effect allele C, odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.43–0.866, p = 0.005). SNP rs547025 exhibits protective effects against UF exclusively in patients with normal fruit and vegetable intake (OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.21–0.75, p = 0.002), no history of spontaneous abortions (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.33–0.70, p = 0.0001), no pelvic inflammatory diseases (PID) in anamnesis (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.38–0.80, p = 0.0016), and in smokers (OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.06–0.65, p = 0.006). In addition, rs7907606 STN1, SLK was associated with the risk of UF in patients without a history of pelvic inflammatory diseases (PID) (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.03–1.74, p = 0.028). SNPs rs547025 SIRT3 and rs7907606 STN1, SLK, displayed the strongest mono-effects (0.71% and 0.52% contribution to UF entropy) and were characterized by the most pronounced gene-gene (G×G) effects when interacting with each other (0.60% contribution to entropy). The interaction Medical abortion×rs547025 SIRT3 served as the base for all the best gene-environment (G×E) models. Medical abortions have the most pronounced mono-effect (1.15% contribution to the entropy of UF), exceeding the mono-effects of SNPs involved in the most significant G×E-models (0.01%–0.49% contribution to entropy) and spontaneous abortions (0.48% of UF entropy) and exceeding the effects of G×E interactions (0.05–0.46% of UF entropy).

Conclusions:

Bioinformatics analysis showed that GWAS SNPs are involved in the molecular mechanisms of UF mainly through the regulation of vasculogenesis, cell proliferation, apoptosis, DNA damage, inflammation, hypoxia, steroid hormone metabolism, cell signaling, organ formation.

1. Introduction

Uterine fibroids (UF), also known as leiomyomas or fibromyomas, are the most common benign tumors of the female reproductive system, affecting up to 68.6% of women of reproductive age [1, 2]. Possible symptoms include prolonged or heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pressure or pain, impaired fertility, and consequent disruption of daily life and psychological well-being [3]. Currently, the leading treatment for fibroids remains surgical intervention [4]. The age of patients at first diagnosis of uterine fibroids is steadily decreasing [1, 5], which impacts their ability to conceive and successfully carry a pregnancy to term [6]. Due to this adverse and irreversible impact on the female reproductive system, risk factors for the development of uterine fibroids must be given particular attention.

Known risk factors for UF include premenopausal age, ethnicity (especially African descent), family history of UF, nulliparity, and increased body mass index (BMI) [7]. The molecular pathogenesis of uterine fibroids remains incompletely understood. Nonetheless, UF are recognised to be largely caused by oxidative stress [8], inflammation [9], hypoxia [10], steroid hormone imbalance [11], and extracellular matrix remodeling [12].

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have successfully identified genetic variants associated with multifactorial diseases, including UF [13, 14, 15, 16]. To date, the GWAS catalog contains data on more than 300 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with UF (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/search?query=uterine%20fibroid). These data help to understand the molecular pathogenesis of the disease and stimulate the development of new drugs and preventive measures [17].

However, the role of GWAS-significant genetic variants in interaction with UF environment-associated risk factors, as well as the role of epistatic interactions between genetic variants, generally remains outside the focus of researchers, creating a significant gap in the functional analysis of GWAS-significant loci.

Our study aimed to replicate the associations of GWAS loci with UF risk in the Central Russian population; identify the most significant intergenic interactions associated with UF; conduct a comprehensive analysis of the combined influence of GWAS-significant loci and risk factors, such as smoking, intake of fresh vegetables and fruits, pelvic inflammatory diseases and medical/spontaneous abortions in history, on the risk of UF; and perform thorough functional annotation of SNPs.

2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Study Participants

The study included 1188 unrelated individuals from Central Russia, comprising 737 hospitalized patients with the diagnosis of uterine fibroid and 451 patients in the control group with no UF. The Ethical Review Committee of Kursk State Medical University approved the study protocol (protocol No. 5 from May 11, 2021), and all patients or their families/legal guardians provided written informed consent. The inclusion criteria for the study required participants to have self-declared Russian ancestry and to have been born in Central Russia. Table 1 provides the baseline and clinical characteristics of the study cohort.

Table 1. The baseline and clinical characteristics of the study cohort.
Baseline and clinical characteristics Uterine fibroid patients (n = 737) Controls (n = 451) p-value
Age, Ме [Q1; Q3] 48 [43; 52] 51 [43; 59] <0.001
Smoking Yes, N (%) 108 (14.7%) 44 (9.7%) >0.05
No, N (%) 629 (85.3%) 407 (90.3%)
Low fruit/vegetable consumption Yes, N (%) 603 (81.8%) ND -
No, N (%) 134 (18.2%) ND
History of infertility Yes, N (%) 8 (1.1%) 2 (0.4%) >0.05
No, N (%) 566 (76.8%) 376 (83.4%)
ND, N (%) 163 (22.1%) 73 (16.2%)
Pelvic inflammatory diseases (PID) Yes, N (%) 108 (14.6%) 61 (13.5%) >0.05
No, N (%) 464 (63.0%) 318 (70.5%)
ND, N (%) 165 (22.4%) 72 (16%)
Family history of UF Yes, N (%) 205 (27.8%) 36 (8%) <0.01
No, N (%) 532 (72.2%) 415 (92%)
Age of menarche Ме [Q1; Q3] 12 [12; 14] 13 [12; 14] >0.05
Pregnancy Yes, N (%) 622 (84.4%) 401 (88.9%) >0.05
No, N (%) 29 (3.9%) 13 (2.9%)
ND, N (%) 86 (11.7%) 37 (8.2%)
Number of pregnancies Ме [Q1; Q3] 3 [2; 5] 3 [2; 4] >0.05
Parity Yes, N (%) 604 (81.9%) 394 (87.4%) >0.05
No, N (%) 44 (6%) 19 (4.2%)
ND, N (%) 89 (12.1%) 38 (8.4%)
Number of labors Ме [Q1; Q3] 2 [1; 2] 2 [1; 2] >0.05
Medical abortion in anamnesis Yes, N (%) 438 (59.4%) 225 (49.9%) >0.05
No, N (%) 201 (27.3%) 178 (39.5%)
ND, N (%) 98 (13.3%) 48 (10.6%)
Number of medical abortions Ме [Q1; Q3] 1 [0; 2] 1 [0; 2] >0.05
Spontaneous abortion in anamnesis Yes, N (%) 133 (18%) 82 (18.2%) >0.05
No, N (%) 478 (64.9%) 318 (70.5%)
ND, N (%) 126 (17.1%) 51 (11.3%)
Number of spontaneous abortions Ме [Q1; Q3] 0 [0; 0] 0 [0; 0] >0.05
Prolonged periods (>7 days) Yes, N (%) 180 (24.4%) 83 (18.4%) >0.05
No, N (%) 442 (60%) 305 (67.6%)
ND, N (%) 115 (15.6%) 63 (14%)
Regular periods Yes, N (%) 357 (48.4%) 200 (44.3%) <0.001
No, N (%) 159 (21.6%) 2 (0.5%)
ND, N (%) 221 (30%) 249 (55.2%)
Dysmenorrhea Yes, N (%) 227 (30.8%) 23 (5.1%) <0.001
No, N (%) 236 (32%) 179 (39.7%)
ND, N (%) 274 (37.2%) 249 (55.2%)
Menorrhagia (heavy menstrual bleeding) Yes, N (%) 370 (50.2%) 36 (8%) <0.001
No, N (%) 144 (19.5%) 166 (36.8%)
ND, N (%) 223 (30.3%) 249 (55.2%)
Multiple form of UF Yes, N (%) 411 (55.8%) - -
No, N (%) 217 (29.4%) -
ND, N (%) 109 (14.8%) -
Age of UF diagnosis Ме [Q1; Q3] 40 [36; 45] - -
Uterine size at age of diagnosis (weeks of pregnancy) Ме [Q1; Q3] 7 [6; 9] - -
Current uterine size (weeks of pregnancy) Ме [Q1; Q3] 9 [7; 12] - -

Note: Me, median; Q1, the first quartile; Q3, the third quartile; ND, no data; UF, uterine fibroids; differences that are statistically significant are indicated in bold.

The patients were enrolled in the study in 2021–2023 at the Perinatal Center and Kursk City Maternity Hospital from gynecological departments. All patients had an ultrasound-confirmed diagnosis of UF.

The control group consisted of relatively healthy patients without clinical or ultrasound signs of uterine fibroids. Controls from the Kursk region were selected from hospitals during routine medical examinations conducted in public institutions and industrial establishments [18, 19, 20, 21]. This group was recruited from the same population and during the same time period.

2.2 Selection of Environment-Associated Risk Factors of UF

As risk factors for the development of uterine fibroids, we considered the following:

• Smoking: Some studies suggest that smoking affects the risk of developing uterine fibroids [7, 22] by lowering estrogen levels [23] and altering regulatory cytokines and receptivity markers, such as C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) [24].

• Intake of fresh vegetables and fruits: This factor has been identified by researchers as a significant risk factor for uterine fibroids [25, 26]. Phytochemicals in these foods, including flavonoids, carotenoids, and polyphenols, are known for their ability to regulate cell proliferation, inflammation, fibrosis, apoptosis, and angiogenesis [27] through managing the response to oxidative stress [28]. In accordance with World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines, low fruit and vegetable consumption was defined as consuming less than 400 g per day. Adequate consumption of fresh vegetables and fruits was defined as consuming 400 g or more, equivalent to 3–4 servings per day, excluding starchy tubers like potatoes [29].

• Spontaneous abortions are considered by Song et al. [30] and Parazzini et al. [31] as a risk factor for uterine fibroids. Early and especially late spontaneous abortions lead to a sharp decrease in steroid sex hormone levels after miscarriage relative to baseline. Abortions influence the expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors, subsequently affecting tumor formation [32].

• Medical (induced) abortions influence the risk of developing uterine fibroids through local inflammation following invasive methods like vacuum extraction or D&C (dilation and curettage) [33].

• Pelvic inflammatory diseases: Trauma, infection, and subsequent inflammation cause an imbalance in the immune system by increasing T-helper cytokines and decreasing the function of regulatory T cells (Treg). This immune response leads to the formation and proliferation of fibrous tissue [34].

2.3 Selection of Genes and Polymorphisms

For this study, we selected SNPs using the GWAS catalog data (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/, assessed on February 15, 2023), which contains data on 238 SNPs located in 169 loci that have been found to be associated with UF risk by 22 GWAS studies. Our study included genetic variants that were associated with the risk of UF in European populations at least in two studies. SNPs with a minor allele frequency <0.05 were excluded from the analysis, as well as loci for which we were unable to design probes for TaqMan-based-PCR (low CG composition, presence of GC clamps, runs of identical nucleotides). In total, seven SNPs were included in the genotyping: rs117245733 LINC00598, rs547025 SIRT3, rs2456181 ZNF346, rs7907606 STN1, SLK, rs58415480 SYNE1, rs7986407 FOXO1, and rs72709458 TERT (Supplementary Table 1).

2.4 Genetic Analysis

The Laboratory of Genomic Research at the Research Institute for Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology of Kursk State Medical University (Kursk, Russia) performed genotyping. Each participant provided up to 5 mL of venous blood from a cubital vein, which was stored in EDTA-coated tubes at –20 °C until processing. Defrosted blood samples were utilised to extract genomic DNA using typical procedures such as phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The extracted DNA samples’ purity, quality, and concentration were evaluated using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

Genotyping of SNPs was carried out employing allele-specific probe-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques designed in the Laboratory of Genomic Research. The Primer3 software (https://primer3.ut.ee/) was used for primer design [35]. A real-time PCR procedure was performed in a 25 µL reaction solution containing 1.5 units of Hot Start Taq DNA polymerase (Biolabmix, Novosibirsk, Russia), approximately 10 ng of DNA, and the following concentrations of reagents: 0.25 µM of each primer; 0.1 µM of each probe; 250 µM of each dNTP; 3 mM MgCl2 for rs117245733 and rs547025; 3.5 mM MgCl2 for rs2456181 and rs7907606; and 2.5 mM MgCl2 for the rs58415480, rs7986407, and rs72709458; 1xPCR buffer (67 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 16.6 mM (NH4)2SO4, 0.01% Tween-20). The PCR procedure comprised an initial denaturation for 10 minutes at 95 °C, followed by 39 cycles of 92 °C for 30 s and 64 °C, 65 °C, 63 °C, 62 °C, 60 °C, 59 °C, 59 °C for 1 min (for rs117245733 LINC00598, rs547025 SIRT3, rs2456181 ZNF346, rs7907606 STN1, SLK, rs58415480 SYNE1, rs7986407 FOXO1, rs72709458 TERT, respectively). 10% of the DNA samples were genotyped twice, blinded to the case-control status, in order to assure quality control. Over 99% of the data were consistant. Due to the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium deviation in the control group for SNP rs7907606 STN1, SLK, all locus samples underwent re-genotyping. The results were entirely consistent (100%) with the initial genotypes.

2.5 Statistical Analysis

The STATISTICA software (version 13.3, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was utilized for statistical processing. The normality of the distribution for quantitative data was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk’s test. Given that the majority of quantitative values had deviations from normal distribution, they were given as the median (Me), along with the first and third quartiles [Q1 and Q3]. To compare the quantitative variables between two independent groups, the Mann-Whitney test was performed. Differences in statistical significance between categorical variables were assessed using Pearson’s chi-squared test with Yates’ correction for continuity. Fisher’s exact test was used to determine if genotype distributions were consistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The study groups’ genotype frequencies and their associations with disease risk were analyzed using regression analysis using the SNPStats software resource (https://www.snpstats.net/start.htm (accessed on 6 June, 2024)). The additive model was considered for the genotype association analysis. Associations within the entire group of UF patients/controls were adjusted for age and UF family history. Environmental risk factors can significantly influence the connection of genetic markers with disease [36, 37]. Therefore, associations were analyzed depending on the presence or absence of the risk factor. Since data on fresh vegetable and fruit consumption was unavailable for the control group, SNP associations were analyzed based solely on the presence or absence of this risk factor within the patient group, using the overall control group as a baseline. To adjust for multiple comparisons, a Bonferroni correction was applied, accounting for the two comparison groups.

The model-based multivariate dimensionality reduction (MB-MDR) method analysis tested two-, three-, and four-level genotype combinations (gene-gene, G×G) and genotype-UF risk factors combinations (gene-environment, G×E). Smoking, medical/spontaneous abortions, and pelvic inflammatory diseases (PID) diseases were analyzed as risk factors in the analysis of G×E interactions. For each model, the empirical p-value (pperm) was estimated using a permutation test. Permutation testing was employed to improve the validity of the results obtained. Because the default call to MB-MDR is designed to simultaneously test all possible interactions of a given order, we used 1000 permutations to obtain accurate p-values. Models with pperm < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All calculations were adjusted for age and family history of UF. Statistical analysis was carried out using the R software (version 3.6.3, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) environment. Models (on average, 3–4 models for each level) with the highest Wald statistics and the lowest p-level of significance were included in the study. Additionally, using the MB-MDR method, individual combinations of genotypes associated with the studied phenotypes were established (p < 0.05). Calculations were performed in the MB-MDR program for the R software environment (Version 3.6.3) [38].

Additionally, the most significant G×G and G×E models were analyzed using the MDR method (the analysis included genes that appeared in the 2 or more best models of 2-, 3-, and 4-locus G×G models in the analysis of intergenic interactions/risk factors and genes included in the 2 or more best models of 2-, 3-, and 4-locus G×E models in the analysis of gene-UF risk factors interactions). The analysis was implemented in the MDR program (v.3.0.2) (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mdr (accessed on 3 June, 2024)). The MDR method was used to assess the mechanisms of interactions (synergy, antagonism, additive interactions (independent effects)) and the strength of interactions (the contribution of individual genes/non-genetic risk factors to the entropy of a trait and the contribution of interactions). The results of the MDR analysis were visualized as a graph.

The functional effects of SNPs were examined using bioinformatics resources, the methodologies and functionalities of which were comprehensively described in our prior research [39, 40, 41]:

• The bioinformatic tool GTExportal (http://www.gtexportal.org/ (accessed on June 10, 2024)) was used to analyze the link of SNPs with expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) in reproductive organs, adipose tissue, vessels, whole blood, thyroid, adrenal, and pituitary glands [42].

• For additional examination of binding SNPs to expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) in peripheral blood, the eQTLGen resource available at https://www.eqtlgen.org/ (accessed on June 10, 2024) was employed [43].

• HaploReg (v4.2), a bioinformatics tool available at https://pubs.broadinstitute.org/mammals/haploreg/haploreg.php (accessed on June 11, 2024), was utilized to assess the associations between GWAS SNPs and specific histone modifications marking promoters and enhancers. These modifications included acetylation of lysine residues at positions 27 and 9 of the histone H3 protein, as well as mono-methylation at position 4 (H3K4me1) and tri-methylation at position 4 (H3K4me3) of the histone H3 protein. Additionally, the tool was applied to investigate the positioning of SNPs in DNase hypersensitive regions and to search for SNPs that are strongly linked (r2 0.8) to the genetic variant being analyzed [44].

• The atSNP Function Prediction online tool (http://atsnp.biostat.wisc.edu/search (accessed on June 11, 2024)) was used to evaluate the impact of SNPs on the gene affinity to transcription factors (TFs) depending on the carriage of the reference/alternative alleles [45]. TFs were included based on the degree of influence of SNPs on the interaction of TFs with DNA, calculated on the basis of a positional weight matrix.

• Using the Gene Ontology online tool (http://geneontology.org/ (accessed on June 11, 2024)), it was feasible to analyze the joint involvement of TFs linked to the reference/SNP alleles in overrepresented biological processes directly related to the pathogenesis of UF [46]. Biological functions controlled by transcription factors associated with SNPs were used as functional groups.

• The Reproductive System Knowledge Portal (RSKP) (https://cd.hugeamp.org/ (accessed on June 15, 2024)), which combines and analyzes the results of genetic associations of the largest consortiums for the study of reproductive system diseases, was used for bioinformatics analysis of associations of SNPs with UF and intermediate phenotypes (such as body mass index, heavy menstrual bleeding, etc.).

3. Results
3.1 Genetic Correlates between GWAS-Significant Loci and the Risk of UF in Russian Population

The genotype frequencies of SNPs within the study cohorts are detailed in Supplementary Table 2. Because connections between genetic markers and disease can produce deviations from equilibrium, we relied on the control group’s Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium results. Within the control group, all studied SNPs exhibited genotype frequencies consistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p > 0.05), except for rs7907606 STN1, SLK (Supplementary Table 1). However, due to the fact that repeated genotyping of rs12610495 showed 100% reproducibility of the primary results, this SNP was included in the statistical analysis.

The analysis of the entire group (Table 2) revealed an association between rs547025 SIRT3 and the decreased risk of UF, regardless of age and family history of UF: effect allele C, OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.43–0.866, p = 0.005.

Table 2. Results of the analysis of associations between GWAS-significant SNPs and UF risk (entire group).
Genetic variant Effect allele (minor) Other allele (major) N OR [95% CI]1 p2
rs117245733 LINC00598 A G 952 0.70 [0.38–1.29] 0.25
rs547025 SIRT3 C T 953 0.61 [0.43–0.86] 0.005
rs2456181 ZNF346 C G 953 0.90 [0.75–1.09] 0.29
rs7907606 STN1, SLK G T 953 1.28 [1.00–1.63] 0.044
rs58415480 SYNE1 C G 954 1.10 [0.86–1.41] 0.44
rs7986407 FOXO1 A G 952 1.07 [0.87–1.31] 0.54
rs72709458 TERT C T 952 1.06 [0.84–1.34] 0.61

All calculations were performed relative to the minor alleles (Effect allele) with adjustment for age. SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; UF family history; GWAS, genome-wide association studies; 1OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; 2p-value; statistically significant differences are marked in bold.

3.2 Gene-Gene Interactions Associated with UF Risk (MB-MDR, MDR Modeling)

Using the MB-MDR approach, four most significant models of gene-gene interactions of polymorphic loci of GWAS-significant genes associated with uterine fibroids were identified: one two-locus, two three-locus, and one four-locus (pperm 0.05) (Table 3). The top G×G interaction models comprised five polymorphic loci, four of which (rs72709458 TERT, rs547025 SIRT3, rs7907606 STN1, SLK, and rs117245733 LINC00598) were present in two or more of the best G×G models.

Table 3. Gene-gene interactions, associated with UF (MB-MDR modeling).
Gene-gene interaction models NH beta H WH NL beta L WL Wmax pperm
The best two-locus models of intergenic interactions (for G×G models with pmin. < 0.002, 1000 permutations)
rs547025 SIRT3 × rs117245733 LINC00598 1 0.11912 10.376 1 –0.11358 6.991 10.376 0.01
The best three-locus models of intergenic interactions (for G×G models with pmin. < 0.0003, 1000 permutations)
rs72709458 TERT × rs7907606 STN1, SLK × rs547025 SIRT3 1 0.0989 5.449 4 –0.1775 14.01 14.01 0.029
rs72709458 TERT × rs58415480 SYNE1 × rs547025 SIRT3 0 NA NA 4 –0.2061 13.46 13.46 0.033
The best four-locus models of gene-gene interactions (for G×G models with pmin. < 0.0001, 1000 permutations)
rs72709458 TERT × rs7907606 STN1, SLK × rs547025 SIRT3 × rs117245733 LINC00598 1 0.1011 5.426 5 –0.1976 17.32 17.32 0.01

Note: MB-MDR, model-based multivariate dimensionality reduction; NH is the number of interacting high-risk genotypes; beta H, regression coefficient for high-risk interactions identified at the 2nd stage of analysis; WH, Wald statistics for high-risk interactions; NL, number of interacting low-risk genotypes; beta L, regression coefficient for low-risk interactions identified at the 2nd stage of analysis; WL, Wald statistics for low-risk interactions; pperm, permutational significance levels for models (all models are adjusted for age; UF family history); G×G, gene-gene; NA, not applicable; Loci included in 2 or more best G×G models are indicated in bold.

In the next step, interactions between genetic variants characterizing at least two of the most significant models were analyzed using the multivariate dimensionality reduction (MDR) method (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Graph reflecting the structure and power of the most significant G×G interactions of GWAS-significant loci associated with UF. The color of the lines reflects the nature of the interaction: green and blue indicate moderate and strong antagonism, brown means additive (independent) effects; % reflects the strength and direction of the phenotypic effect of gene-gene interaction (% of entropy). Created in the MDR (v3.0.2) program. (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mdr)

The MDR method, firstly, showed that the genetic variants involved in the best G×G models are characterized by antagonism and additive (independent) effects. Secondly, the mono-effects of genetic variants included in the most significant G×G models (0.01%–0.71% contribution to the entropy of the UF) are comparable to the effects of gen-gene interactions (0.02%–0.60% contribution to the entropy of the trait). Third, the most prominent mono-effect is reported for rs547025 SIRT3 (0.71% contribution to the entropy of UF). Fourth, SNPs rs547025 SIRT3 and rs7907606 STN1, SLK, which showed association with UF at the stage of analysis of individual genetic variants, also displayed the strongest mono-effects in the MDR analysis (0.71% and 0.52% contribution to UF entropy) and were characterized by the most pronounced G×G effects when interacting with each other (0.60% contribution to entropy).

Fifth, the strongest associations with UF have the following combinations of genotypes: rs547025 SIRT3 T/T×rs117245733 LINC00598 G/G (Beta = 0.11912; p = 0.001); rs72709458 TERT T/C×rs7907606 STN1, SLK T/T×rs547025 SIRT3 C/T (Beta = –0.17828; p = 0.02); rs72709458 TERT T/C×rs58415480 SYNE1 G/C×rs547025 SIRT3 C/T (Beta = –0.246779; p = 0.02); rs72709458 TERT T/C×rs7907606 STN1, SLK T/T×rs547025 SIRT3 C/T×rs117245733 LINC00598 G/G (Beta = –0.19529; p = 0.01) (Supplementary Table 3).

3.3 Environmental Risk Factors-Associated Correlates of GWAS SNPs

Risk factor-stratified analysis is detailed in Supplementary Table 4. We discovered that rs547025 SIRT3 was related to UF regardless of a history of medical abortions in the anamnesis; nonetheless, it was modified by all other risk factors that were evaluated (Table 4). Thus, rs547025 SIRT3 exhibited protective effects against UF exclusively in patients with normal fruit and vegetable intake (OR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.21–0.75, pbonf = 0.002), no history of spontaneous abortions (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.33–0.70, p = 0.0001), no pelvic inflammatory diseases (PID) in anamnesis (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.38–0.80, p = 0.0016), and in smokers (OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.06–0.65, p = 0.006). In addition, rs7907606 STN1, SLK was associated with the risk of UF in patients without a history of PID (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.03–1.74, p = 0.028) (Table 4).

Table 4. Statistically significant associations between GWAS SNPs and UF risk depending on smoking, level of fruit and vegetable intake, spontaneous/medical abortions in anamnesis, pelvic inflammatory diseases in anamnesis.
Genetic variant Effect allele Other allele N OR [95% CI]1 p2 (pbonf) N OR [95% CI]1 p2 (pbonf)
Nonsmokers Smokers
rs547025 C T 621 0.73 [0.49–1.08] 0.11 130 0.20 [0.06–0.65] 0.006
SIRT3
Normal fruit and vegetable intake Low fruit and vegetable intake
rs547025 C T 529 0.39 [0.21–0.75] 0.001 (0.002) 927 0.71 [0.52–0.97] 0.034 (0.068)
SIRT3
No spontaneous abortion Spontaneous abortion
rs547025 C T 699 0.48 [0.33–0.70] 0.0001 189 1.53 [0.67–3.50] 0.3
SIRT3
No medical abortion Medical abortion
rs547025 C T 334 0.56 [0.32–0.97] 0.037 585 0.62 [0.41–0.93] 0.021
SIRT3
No PID in anamnesis PID in anamnesis
rs547025 C T 696 0.55 [0.38–0.80] 0.0016 135 0.68 [0.30–1.56] 0.36
SIRT3
rs7907606 G T 696 1.34 [1.03–1.74] 0.028 135 1.25 [0.64–2.45] 0.51
STN1, SLK

All calculations were performed relative to the minor alleles (Effect allele); SNP, single nucleotide polymorphisms; 1OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; 2p-value; statistically significant differences are marked in bold.

3.4 Gene-Environmental Interactions, Associated with UF (MB-MDR Modeling)

Using the MB-MDR approach, nine most significant gene-environment interactions associated with UF were identified: two two-level, three three-level, and four four-level (Table 5). Notably, SNPs rs547025 SIRT3, rs2456181 ZNF346, and rs72709458 TERT were involved in two or more of the best G×E-models. The top G×E models included only medical and spontaneous abortions as non-genetic risk factors. The interaction Med_abort × rs547025 SIRT3 served as the base for all the best G×E models.

Table 5. Gene-environmental interactions, associated with UF (MB-MDR modeling).
Gene-gene interaction models NH beta H WH NL beta L WL Wmax pperm
The best two-order models of gene-smoking interactions (for G×E models with pmin. < 1 × 10–⁢5, 1000 permutations)
Med_abort × rs547025 SIRT3 1 0.14406 22.620 3 –0.1278 16.43 22.62 <0.001
Med_abort × rs2456181 ZNF346 1 0.08028 4.678 1 –0.1825 19.97 19.97 0.001
The best three-order models of gene-interactions (for G×E models with pmin. < 1 × 10–⁢6, 1000 permutations)
Spont_abort × Med_abort × rs547025 SIRT3 3 0.15962 26.705 4 –0.2160 30.42 30.42 <0.001
Med_abort × rs547025 SIRT3 × rs117245733 LINC00598 1 0.15619 26.791 3 –0.1226 14.62 26.79 <0.001
Med_abort × rs72709458 TERT × rs547025 SIRT3 2 0.14167 21.931 5 –0.1551 24.32 24.32 <0.001
The best four-order models of gene-interactions (for G×E models with pmin. < 1 × 10–⁢8, 1000 permutations)
Spont_abort × Med_abort × rs7986407 FOXO1 × rs547025 SIRT3 2 0.1271 12.15 6 –0.3142 41.33 41.33 <0.001
Spont_abort × Med_abort × rs72709458 TERT × rs547025 SIRT3 3 0.1463 15.26 5 –0.2802 35.26 35.26 <0.001
Spont_abort × Med_abort × rs2456181 ZNF346 × rs547025 SIRT3 3 0.1273 11.05 5 –0.2191 34.27 34.27 <0.001
Spont_abort × Med_abort × rs58415480 SYNE1 × rs547025 SIRT3 3 0.1209 11.80 7 –0.2461 33.72 33.72 <0.001

Note: NH is the number of high-risk interactions; beta H, regression coefficient for high-risk interactions identified at the 2nd stage of analysis; WH, Wald statistics for high-risk interactions; NL, number of interacting low-risk interactions; beta L, regression coefficient for low-risk interactions identified at the 2nd stage of analysis; WL, Wald statistics for low-risk interactions; pperm, permutational significance levels for models (all models are adjusted for age, UF family history); G×E , gene-environment; Loci/risk factors included in 2 or more best G×E models are indicated in bold.

In the next step, interactions between these risk factors and genetic variants characterizing at least two of the most significant models were analyzed using the multivariate dimensionality reduction (MDR) method (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Graph reflecting the structure and power of the most significant G×E interactions of GWAS-significant loci associated with UF. The color of the lines reflects the nature of the interaction: red and orange mean strong and moderate synergism, blue and green—pronounced and moderate antagonism, respectively; brown means additive (independent) effects; % reflects the strength and direction of the phenotypic effect of gene-environmental interaction (% of entropy). Created in the MDR program.

First, MDR revealed that such an environmental risk factor as medical abortions has the most pronounced mono-effect (1.15% contribution to the entropy of UF), exceeding the mono-effects of SNPs involved in the most significant models of gene-environment interactions (0.01%–0.49% contribution to entropy) or spontaneous abortions (0.48% of UF entropy), and exceeding the effects of gene-environment interactions (0.05%–0.46% of UF entropy) (Fig. 2). Secondly, in interaction with spontaneous/medical abortions, rs72709458 TERT is characterized by synergism, rs2456181 ZNF346 by antagonism, and rs547025 SIRT3 by independent (additive) effects. Thirdly, spontaneous and medical abortions interact antagonistically. Fourthly, SNPs characterizing the best G×E models interact with each other additively (characterized by independent effects), with the exception of the interaction rs547025 SIRT3 × rs2456181 ZNF346, which is characterized by moderate antagonism.

Fifth, the strongest associations with UF have the following gene-environmental interactions: medical abortion × rs547025 SIRT3 T/T (Beta = 0.14406; p = 2.3 × 10-6); no medical abortion × rs2456181 ZNF346 G/C (Beta = –0.182504; p = 8.9 ×10-6); spontaneous abortion ×no medical abortion × rs547025 SIRT3 T/T (Beta = –0.23070; p = 0.0002); medical abortion × rs547025 SIRT3 T/T × rs117245733 LINC00598 G/G (Beta = 0.15619; p = 2.8 × 10-7); medical abortion × rs72709458 TERT C/C × rs547025 SIRT3 T/T (Beta = 0.10088; p = 0.003); spontaneous abortion × no medical abortion × rs7986407 FOXO1 A/A × rs547025 SIRT3 T/T (Beta = –0.300409; p = 0.001); spontaneous abortion × no medical abortion × rs72709458 TERT C/C × rs547025 SIRT3 T/T (Beta = –0.259627; p = 0.001); spontaneous abortion × no medical abortion × rs2456181 ZNF346 G/C × rs547025 SIRT3 T/T (Beta = –0.267481; p = 0.001); spontaneous abortion × no medical abortion × rs58415480 SYNE1 G/C × rs547025 SIRT3 T/T (Beta = –0.366657; p = 0.003) (Supplementary Table 5).

The summary of the effects of GWAS SNPs on the contribution to UF is provided in Table 6.

Table 6. Summarised results of the analysis of G×G and G×E interactions using the MB-MDR and MDR methods (analysis of mono-effects of SNPs, G×G and G×E interactions relative to the contribution to the entropy of UF).
SNP G×G interactions G×E interactions
Mono-effect GG-effect Mono-effect GE-effect
rs547025 SIRT3 0.71% 0.91% 0.49% 0.32%
rs117245733 LINC00598 0.04% 0.26% -
rs72709458 TERT 0.01% 0.30% 0.01% 0.66%
rs7907606 STN1, SLK 0.52% 0.81% -
rs2456181 ZNF346 - 0.40% 0.72%
3.5 Functional Annotation of UF-Associated SNPs

In our analysis of genetic variants, gene-gene, and gene-environment interactions, we identified significant associations between UF and the following GWAS-identified loci: rs547025 SIRT3, rs117245733 LINC00598, rs72709458 TERT, rs7907606 STN1, SLK, and rs2456181 ZNF346. A comprehensive functional annotation of these SNPs was also performed.

3.5.1 QTL-Effects

The results of the cis-eQTL analysis (Table 7), shed light on the impact of specific genetic variants on gene expression. According to the GTEx Portal, rs547025 SIRT3 increases the expression of RP11-326C3.12 in the adrenal gland and decreasea the expression of RIC8A in adipose tissue (subcutaneous) and PSMD13 in cultured fibroblasts. SNP rs2456181 ZNF346 increases the expression of FGFR4 in subcutaneous adipose tissue, arteries, pituitary, cultured fibroblasts, and whole blood and increases UIMC1 expression in subcutaneous adipose tissue, ovaries, and whole blood. Additionally, rs2456181 ZNF346 decreases the expression of ZNF346 and ZNF346-IT1 in the thyroid gland.

Table 7. Impact of UF-associated GWAS-significant SNPs on gene expression via cis-eQTL effects (GTEx Portal data).
SNP Gene Expressed p-value Effect (NES) Tissue
rs547025 SIRT3 (T/C) RP11–326C3.12 3.1 × 10–⁢6 0.82 Adrenal Gland
PSMD13 1.0 × 10–⁢7 –0.15 Cells - Cultured fibroblasts
RIC8A 1.6 × 10–⁢5 –0.23 Adipose - Subcutaneous
rs2456181 ZNF346 (G/C) FGFR4 1.6 × 10–⁢7 0.24 Adipose - Subcutaneous
UIMC1 5.5 × 10–⁢7 0.099 Adipose - Subcutaneous
FGFR4 4.2 × 10–⁢5 0.22 Artery - Aorta
FGFR4 2.3 × 10–⁢9 0.26 Artery - Tibial
FGFR4 1.4 × 10–⁢9 0.30 Cells - Cultured fibroblasts
UIMC1 1.8 × 10–⁢5 0.26 Ovary
FGFR4 2.7 × 10–⁢5 0.27 Pituitary
ZNF346 3.8 × 10–⁢22 –0.30 Thyroid
ZNF346–IT1 3.9 × 10–⁢5 –0.16 Thyroid
FGFR4 4.5 × 10–⁢12 0.28 Whole Blood
UIMC1 4.1 × 10–⁢5 0.067 Whole Blood

Note: Effect alleles are marked in bold. eQTL, expression quantitative trait loci; NES, normalized effect size.

Moreover, data from the eQTLGen Browser indicated (Table 8) that rs547025 SIRT3 is associated with reduced expression levels of PSMD13, BET1L, SCGB1C1, RIC8A, ODF3, IFITM3, PTDSS2, and an elevation in the expression of IFITM2 and IFITM1 in blood. SNP rs7907606 STN1, SLK is correlated with decreased expression of RP11-541N10.3, OBFC, and increased expression levels of SLK, SH3PXD2A, GSTO1, RP11-127L20.6, ITPRIP, and CALHM2 in the blood. And finally, SNP rs2456181 ZNF346 was correlated with increased UIMC1, FGFR4, and HK3 and decreased ZNF346-IT1 in blood.

Table 8. Relationship between GWAS SNPs and cis-eQTL-mediated expression levels of genes in whole blood (according to browser eQTLGene).
SNP Symbol Z-score Assessed Other FDR
rs547025 SIRT3 (T/C) PSMD13 –16.7775 C T 0
BET1L –16.5046 C T 0
SCGB1C1 –14.2627 C T 0
RIC8A –7.7756 C T 0
ODF3 –7.0824 C T 0
IFITM2 6.4087 C T 0
IFITM1 5.74 C T 5.8 × 10–⁢5
IFITM3 –4.6478 C T 0.01
PTDSS2 –4.3283 C T 0.04
rs7907606 STN1, SLK (T/G) SLK 13.0742 G T 0
SH3PXD2A 9.3992 G T 0
RP11-541N10.3 –7.5035 G T 0
GSTO1 6.8781 G T 0
OBFC1 –6.7461 G T 0
RP11-127L20.6 6.2581 G T 0
ITPRIP 5.6728 G T 7 × 10–⁢5
CALHM2 4.5757 G T 0.01
rs2456181 ZNF346 (G/C) UIMC1 34.9529 G C 0
FGFR4 13.9163 G C 0
ZNF346-IT1 –4.477 G C 0.02
HK3 4.2789 G C 0.047

Note: FDR, false discovery rate.

3.5.2 Transcription Factors

The analysis of transcription factors of GWAS loci is presented in Supplementary Tables 6–10. It was revealed that the risk allele G rs7907606 STN1, SLK creates DNA binding sites for 37 TFs, co-controlling cell differentiation (GO:0030154; false discovery rate (FDR) = 1.24 × 10-6) and cell population proliferation (GO:0008283; FDR = 0.03). Protective allele T rs7907606 STN1, SLK creates DNA binding sites for 192 TFs, co-controlling pituitary gland development (GO:0021983; FDR = 2.38 × 10-9) and connective tissue development (GO:0061448; FDR = 1.44 × 10-6) (Supplementary Table 6).

SNP allele G rs2456181 ZNF346 creates DNA binding sites for 45 TFs, co-controlling positive regulation of angiogenesis (GO:0045766; FDR = 0.01), regulation of cell population proliferation (GO:0042127; FDR = 0.002), interleukin-9-mediated signaling pathway (GO:0038113; FDR = 0.007), growth hormone receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STAT (GO:0060397; FDR = 0.013), cellular response to interleukin-17 (GO:0097398; FDR = 0.025), positive regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor production (GO:0010575; FDR = 0.002), cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STAT (GO:0007259; FDR = 0.008) (Supplementary Table 7).

SNP allele A rs117245733 LINC00598 creates DNA binding sites for 37 TFs, jointly involved in cellular response to steroid hormone stimulus (GO:0071383; FDR = 0.01) and negative regulation of Wnt signaling pathway (GO:0030178; FDR = 0.014) (Supplementary Table 7). Reference allele G rs117245733 LINC00598 creates DNA binding sites for 32 TFs, regulating the following biological processes: hormone-mediated signaling pathway (GO:0009755; FDR = 1.68 × 10-4), positive regulation of apoptotic process (GO:0043065; FDR = 0.005), and muscle organ development (GO:0007517; FDR = 0.006) (Supplementary Table 8).

Carriage of the SNP T allele rs72709458 TERT results in loss of DNA binding to TFs that are jointly involved in DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediator (GO:0006978; FDR = 0.015), response to hypoxia (GO:0001666; FDR = 0.014), negative regulation of cell population proliferation (GO:0008285; FDR = 3.29 × 10-6), regulation of mitotic cell cycle phase transition (GO:1901990; FDR = 0.02), cellular response to cytokine stimulus (GO:0071345; FDR = 0.003), negative regulation of apoptotic process (GO:0043066; FDR = 0.048) (Supplementary Table 9).

3.5.3 Histone Modifications

Using the bioinformatics tool HaploReg (v4.2), we analyzed histone modifications associated with SNPs identified in our study as linked to an increased risk of UF (Supplementary Table 11).

SNPs rs547025 SIRT3, rs7907606 STN1, SLK, rs117245733 LINC00598, and rs2456181 ZNF346 are characterized by histone H3 mono-methylation at the 4th lysine residue (H3K4me1), acetylation of the lysine residues at N-terminal position 27 of the histone H3 protein (H3K27ac), and acetylation at the 9th lysine residues of the histone H3 protein (H3K9ac) in the blood. Similarly, SNPs rs117245733 LINC00598 and rs2456181 ZNF346 are associated with histone tags in blood vessels, ovary, and adipose tissue (Supplementary Table 11).

3.5.4 Bioinformatic Analysis of the Associations of GWAS SNPs with UF and UF-Related Phenotypes

According to the bioinformatic resource Reproductive System Knowledge Portal, the GWAS-significant SNPs rs547025 SIRT3, rs117245733 LINC00598, rs72709458 TERT, rs7907606 STN1, SLK and rs2456181 ZNF346, associated with UF in our study, are linked to the increased risk of UF and heavy menstrual bleeding in other populations (all SNPs), to age at natural menopause (rs547025 SIRT3, rs2456181 ZNF346), and body mass index (rs7907606 STN1, SLK) (Table 9).

Table 9. Results of aggregated bioinformatic analyzes of associations between GWAS SNPs and the risk of UF.
No SNP Phenotype p-value Beta (OR) Sample Size
1. rs547025 SIRT3 (C/T) Uterine fibroids 4.78 × 10–⁢13 OR▼0.8724 244,324
2. Uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding 1.70 × 10–⁢6 OR▼0.9967 13,406
3. Heavy menstrual bleeding 0.01 OR▼0.9965 37,507
4. Age at natural menopause (ANM) 0.036 Beta▼–0.0120 244,171
5. rs7907606 STN1, SLK (G/T) Uterine fibroids 6.14 × 10–⁢9 OR▲1.0827 244,324
6. Body mass index (BMI) 1.05 × 10–⁢4 Beta▼–0.0084 2,140,420
7. Uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding 0.001 OR▲1.0016 13,406
8. rs117245733 LINC00598 (G/A) Uterine fibroids 2.52 × 10–⁢2 OR▲1.3127 244,324
9. Uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding 0.0019 OR▲1.0046 13,406
10. rs2456181 ZNF346 (C/G) Age at natural menopause (ANM) 3.12 × 10–⁢134 Beta▲0.0853 162,657
11. Uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding 4.00 × 10–⁢10 OR▲1.0023 13,406
12. Uterine fibroids 5.62 × 10–⁢9 OR▲1.0677 239,139
13. Heavy menstrual bleeding 0.000059 OR▲1.0028 37,507
14. rs72709458 TERT (C/T) Uterine fibroids 6.07 × 10–⁢15 OR▲1.1049 244,324
15. Heavy menstrual bleeding 1.70 × 10–⁢8 OR▲1.0050 37,507
16. Uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding 3.30 × 10–⁢8 OR▲1.0025 13,406

Data obtained using the bioinformatic resource Reproductive System Knowledge Portal (https://reproductive.hugeamp.org/). ▼, indicates a decrease in the effect; ▲, indicates a increase in the effect. Effect alleles are marked in bold.

For a more in-depth analysis of the phenotypic effects of UF-GWAS-significant SNPs, we included assessement of polymorphic loci strongly linked (with r2 0.8) to the genetic variants rs547025 SIRT3, rs117245733 LINC00598, rs72709458 TERT, rs7907606 STN1, SLK, and rs2456181 ZNF346. It turned out that out of 71 strongly linked SNPs, 63 are associated with uterine fibroids risk, 56 with heavy menstrual bleeding, 56 with age at natural menopause, six with body mass index, and one with estradiol levels (Supplementary Tables 12–14).

4. Discussion

In the present study, we replicated the associations of the GWAS loci rs547025 SIRT3 and rs7907606 STN1, SLK with the occurrence of uterine myoma among the Caucasian population of Central Russia. We also discovered, for the first time, that environment-associated risk factors like as cigarette smoking, consuming fresh vegetables and fruits, and undergoing abortions have an important impact on these connections (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

The outline of associations between environment-associated risk factors, GWAS SNPs and UF risk. Created with Biorender.

We identified GWAS SNPs with particularly prominent epistatic interactions and performed a comprehensive bioinformatics inquiry of UF-associated variants (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Overrepresented biological processes associated with TFs binding to GWAS SNPs.

According to our data, rs547025 SIRT3, previously described as reducing the likelihood of UF [47, 48], was also linked with a decreased risk of UF in the present study in the entire group, regardless of the history of medical abortions, but this was modified by environmental risk factors such as smoking and the level of consumption of fresh vegetables and fruits. It is interesting that, on the one hand, these environmental factors themselves act as significant regulators of cellular oxidative stress and modifiers of associations of genetic markers with the risk of developing multifactorial human diseases [49, 50, 51, 52]; on the other hand, it has been shown that rs547025 SIRT3 has the capacity to impact tumor cell proliferation and progesterone production by controlling the response to oxidative stress [28].

SIRT3 is known as a regulator of oxidative stress, and SIRT3 mRNA levels are upregulated by reactive oxygen species [28]. However, SIRT3 also positively regulates the expression of genes associated with folliculogenesis, luteinization, and progesterone secretion in human ovarian tissue [53]. Thus, high levels of oxidative stress in patients with low consumption of fresh vegetables and fruits might serve as a factor in increasing SIRT3 expression and driving enhanced progesterone release, a substantial risk factor for the UF [54, 55, 56]. In contrast, lower SIRT3 levels lead to decreased mRNA expression of many agents associated with steroidogenesis and, as a consequence, potentially lower levels of progesterone secretion in patients with normal levels of fresh vegetable and fruit consumption, which explains the protective effect of rs547025 SIRT3 in this group of patients.

Surprisingly, we observed an association of rs547025 SIRT3 specifically in smokers, despite the fact that smoking is known to increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels [57]. However, tobacco smoke pollution has been shown to decrease SIRT3 mRNA expression [58], and benzapyrene, a component of cigarette smoke, resulted in increased methylation of SIRT3 3′ UTR [59]. Given that increased methylation is a regulating cause of decreased gene expression, this finding provides support for the protective effects of smoking on UF. In addition, a fairly large number of studies indicate the protective effects of smoking on UF development [7, 22, 60], likely due to the influence of smoking on hormone levels. Women who smoke tend to exhibit lower urinary estrogen levels during the luteal phase compared to non-smokers [61], as nicotine can inhibit aromatase activity, reducing the conversion of androgens to estrone [62]. Thus, smoking is associated with impaired production and reduced levels of endogenous circulating estrogens [22], suggesting that these effects may be mediated through the influence of rs547025 SIRT3 in smokers. Thus, it is possible that the protective impact of SIRT3 is particularly pronounced in smokers, possibly through its role in regulating estrogen levels [63].

We also observed a protective effect of rs547025 SIRT3 against UF exclusively in patients without a history of spontaneous abortion. Spontaneous abortion is diagnosed up to 22 weeks of pregnancy, therefore, the level of estrogen and progesterone at these stages of pregnancy is many times higher in a pregnant woman until the moment of miscarriage [64]. Most likely, additional factors, such as a more dramatic decrease in steroid sex hormone levels relative to baseline after placental abruption [7], as well as the highly invasive nature of the method for removing fetal remnants, which entails severe local inflammation [33], are strong risk factors for the development of UF, exceeding the effect of rs547025 SIRT3.

The existence of pelvic inflammatory disorders also altered the relationship between rs547025 SIRT3 and the UF risk; rs547025’s protective effect was detected only in women who had no history of pelvic inflammatory diseases. Most likely, inflammatory diseases, which can be a risk factor for the development of uterine fibroids, according to many previous studies [9, 65], may exceed the protective effect of rs547025 SIRT3 due to a more significant contribution to the pathogenesis of the disease.

The bioinformatics analysis assisted in understanding the functional impact of rs547025 SIRT3. Thus, rs547025 SIRT3 is characterized by a cis-eQTL effect on reducing the expression of RIC8A in subcutaneous fat and blood. RIC8A has already been described as a risk factor for UF in Japanese [15] and European [14, 66] populations.

In blood, rs547025 SIRT3 affects expression levels of PSMD13, previously identified as a risk factor for UF in GWAS [13, 67] and transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) [68] studies. PSMD13 is thought to be linked to platelet count, which acts as a mediator in immunological and inflammatory responses [69]. A cis-eQTL-mediated effect of rs547025 SIRT3 on the reduction of BET1L (Bet1 Golgi vesicular membrane trafficking protein like) gene expression was also found, implicated in UF risk and UF volume, as previously described in Chinese [70], European American [71], and Taiwanese [72] populations. The role of the rs547025-cis-eQTL-linked gene SCGB1C1 in UF risk was described by Sakai K. et al. [16] in 2020; altered ODF3 gene expression has been shown in various tumors of the reproductive system [73, 74]. IFITM2, IFITM1, and IFITM3, also regulated by rs547025 SIRT3 via cis-eQTL effects, are described by P. Cha as risk factors for UF [69]. Cis-eQTL-linked gene PTDSS2 was also implicated in tumorigenesis [75, 76].

Bioinformatics analysis of data from the Reproductive System Knowledge Portal showed associations of rs547025 and strongly linked (r2 0.8) SNPs with various UF phenotypes, in particular, with a reduced risk of UF and heavy menstrual bleeding, as well as an expedited onset of menopause, which acts as a factor in reducing the risk of UF as a benign tumor of the reproductive period [77].

Our study also found that rs7907606 STN1, SLK was associated with an increased risk of UF in patients without pelvic inflammatory disease. Inflammation is a significant risk factor for uterine fibroids. Trauma, infection, and subsequent inflammation cause an imbalance in the immune system by increasing T-helper cytokines and decreasing target cell function [78], and the inflammatory response of the immune system leads to the formation and proliferation of fibrous tissue [34, 79]. Most likely, the contribution of inflammation to the formation of this trait exceeds the contribution of rs7907606 STN1, SLK, explaining the lack of link in patients with a history of PID.

The association between rs7907606 STN1, SLK and the risk of UF has already been described by Cha P.C. et al. [67], Ishigaki K. et al. [80] and Masuda T. et al. [15] in the Japanese population, as well as by Edwards T.L. et al. [81] in the European and African populations. Rafnar T. et al. [48] and Välimäki N. et al. [82] also described the association between rs7907606 STN1, SLK and UF risk in the European population. This SNP affects the expression of various genes in the blood: increases the expression of SH3PXD2A and GSTO1, which, according to the Reproductive System Knowledge Portal, are associated with the risk of UF with a moderate and very strong evidence range (HuGE score levels 3.0 (https://reproductive.hugeamp.org/gene.html?gene=SH3PXD2A) and 45.0 (https://reproductive.hugeamp.org/gene.html?gene=GSTO1), respectively; TPRIP, which was also noted in the impact on UF risk [82]. Furthermore, modified OBFC1 expression as a risk factor for UF has been described in the studies of Edwards T. L. et al. [81], Rafnar T. et al. [48] and Välimäki N. et al. [82].

The analysis of transcription factors revealed that the risk allele G rs7907606 STN1, SLK creates DNA binding sites for TFs involved in cell differentiation and proliferation, which provides further evidence for its possible role in tumorigenesis and UF development [83, 84] (Supplementary Table 5). According to the bioinformatics resource “Reproductive System Knowledge Portal”, rs7907606 STN1, SLK, as well as six SNPs strongly linked to it (r2 0.8) are associated with a risk of UF/increased risk of heavy menstrual bleeding, as well as with body mass index (Supplementary Table 11).

Analysis of gene-gene interactions through the MDR method revealed that SNPs associated with UF at the stage of single genetic variant analysis (rs547025 SIRT3 and rs7907606 STN1, SLK) possessed the greatest pronounced mono-effect (0.71% and 0.52% contribution to UF entropy, respectively) and effect of gene-gene interactions with each other (0.60% contribution to entropy). G×E interaction analysis utilizing the MB-MDR approach revealed that medical and spontaneous abortions in combination with GWAS-significant SNPs play a substantial role in determining the risk of UF in the genotype-environment aspect. Furthermore, these factors interacted in various ways with SNPs that formed the best models of gene-environment interactions: synergistically with rs72709458 TERT; antagonistically with rs2456181 ZNF346; and additively with rs547025 SIRT3. Thus, MB-MDR analysis revealed three more SNPs associated with UF: rs2456181 ZNF346, rs72709458 TERT, rs117245733 LINC00598.

The association between SNP rs2456181 ZNF346 and the risk of UF was described by Gallagher C.S. et al. [14] and Sliz E. et al. [85]. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that rs2456181 ZNF34 is characterized by a cis-eQTL effect on the expression level of genes that have shown an association with UF in previous studies: UIMC1 [66], HK3 [48], and FGFR4 [14]. The role of FGFR4 in the regulation of cell apoptosis was noted in studies of uterine sarcoma [86]. Transcription factor analysis showed that the SNP G allele creates DNA binding sites for 45 TFs, co-controlling positive regulation of angiogenesis, regulation of cell population proliferation, the interleukin-9-mediated signaling pathway, the growth hormone receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STAT, the cellular response to interleukin-17, positive regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor production, and the cell surface receptor signaling pathway via JAK-STAT (Supplementary Table 6). Interestingly, one study found a significant decrease in circulating growth factors, including VEGF and IL-7, in women with UF [87]. In contrast, during UF development, there is an increase in growth factors associated with hematopoiesis and angiogenesis in the myometrial and leiomyoma tissues [88, 89]. Additionally, JAK-STAT pathway activation in leiomyoma cells may drive extracellular matrix production, a key feature of UF [90, 91].

Numerous studies have linked rs117245733 LINC00598 to the risk of UF [14, 48, 85, 92]. LINC00598 (Long Intergenic Non-Protein Coding RNA 598) is an RNA gene, and is affiliated with the lncRNA class (https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=LINC00598&keywords=LINC00598). Our bioinformatics analysis showed that allele A rs117245733 LINC00598 creates DNA binding sites for 37 TFs, jointly involved in cellular response to steroid hormone stimulus and negative regulation of the Wnt signaling pathway. This suggests a significant role for this SNP in UF, as Wnt signaling is known to promote the formation and growth of fibroids [93, 94], while steroid hormones are fundamental in UF pathogenesis [56, 95]. Reference allele G rs117245733 creates DNA binding sites for 32 TFs, regulating the hormone-mediated signaling pathway, positive regulation of the apoptotic process, and muscle organ development. According to bioinformatics analysis of the Reproductive System Knowledge Portal, rs117245733 LINC00598 increases the risk of UF and heavy menstrual bleeding.

Finally, we found the association of rs72709458 TERT, which was previously described in the study of Gallagher C.S. et al. [14] as a risk factor for UF. According to the bioinformatic resource “Reproductive System Knowledge Portal”, rs72709458 TERT increases the risk of UF and heavy menstrual bleeding. Carriage of the SNP T allele rs72709458 TERT results in loss of DNA binding to TFs that are jointly involved in DNA damage response, signal transduction by p53 class mediator resulting in transcription of p21 class mediator, response to hypoxia, negative regulation of cell population proliferation, regulation of mitotic cell cycle phase transition, cellular response to cytokine stimulus, and negative regulation of the apoptotic process. These processes are particuraly interesting, as they are closely intertwined and significantly contribute to UF development [96]. The tumor suppressor protein p53, for instance, can be down-regulated by estradiol, illustrating a primary mechanism through which estrogen promotes UF growth [97]. p53 regulates the cell cycle by influencing factors related to cell proliferation and apoptosis, such as p21 and Bax [98, 99, 100, 101]. When estrogen reduces p53 levels, apoptosis is suppressed, thereby enabling tumor proliferation.

5. Study Limitations

First, we were limited in the number of SNP markers studied. Second, we chose the genotyping technique using Taq-man probes, and therefore several SNPs were excluded from the analysis due to methodological problems. Third, we were limited in the availability of a sample of patients with UF from another Russian population, which prevented us from performing a replication study of our associations. Fourth, we did not have information on the level of consumption of fresh vegetables and fruits in the control group, so this environmental risk factor was not included in MB-MDR. Fifth, some clinical data were missing in some patients, and also belonged to the category of low-frequency factors, and therefore they could not be assessed in terms of gene-environment interactions and the influence of SNPs on clinical manifestations.

6. Conclusions

In conclusion, our study replicated the associations of GWAS-significant loci with UF in Russians. For the first time, we showed that GWAS loci interact substantially with medical and spontaneous abortion history in terms of associations with UF risk, that may additionally be significantly altered by risk factors such as pelvic inflammatory disorders, smoking, and fruit/vegetable intake. Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis revealed that the molecular mechanisms of involvement of GWAS SNP in UF risk are determined by their role in the regulation of cell proliferation, inflammation, apoptosis, hypoxia, vasculogenesis, DNA damage, and cell signaling, all of playing crucial parts in the pathogenesis of uterine fibroids. Unlike previous studies focused primarily on identifying GWAS-significant loci, our findings emphasize that environmental factors can modify associations with the risk of UF. This integrated approach to assessing genetic and environmental contributions may advance personalized medicine for UF and open new possibilities for applying GWAS findings to the prevention and management of uterine fibroids in particular and of multifactorial human pathology in general.

Availability of Data and Materials

All data reported in this paper will also be shared by the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Author Contributions

OB designed the research study. LP, KK, and OB performed the research. LP, KK, and OB analyzed the data. LP and OB wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The research protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kursk State Medical University (protocol No. 5, from May 11, 2021), and all patients or their families/legal guardians provided signed informed consent. The study was carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbs1604024.

References

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.