IMR Press / FBL / Volume 27 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.31083/j.fbl2704126
Open Access Review
The Impact of Digestive Dynamics on the Bioequivalence of Amino Acids in Broiler Chickens
Show Less
1 Poultry Research Foundation within The University of Sydney, 2570 Camden, NSW, Australia
2 Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, 2570 Camden, NSW, Australia
3 School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, 2006 Camperdown, NSW, Australia
4 Complete Feed Solutions, 2145 Howick, New Zealand
*Correspondence: peter.selle@sydney.edu.au (Peter H. Selle); sonia.liu@sydney.edu.au (Sonia Yun Liu)
Academic Editors: Guoyao Wu and Graham Pawelec
Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed) 2022, 27(4), 126; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2704126
Submitted: 22 February 2022 | Revised: 30 March 2022 | Accepted: 30 March 2022 | Published: 8 April 2022
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

The purpose of this review is to consider the distinct possibility that dietary non-bound and protein-bound amino acids are not bioequivalent in broiler chickens. Usually, with conservative inclusions of a limited number of non-bound (synthetic, crystalline, feed-grade) amino acids in standard broiler diets, bioequivalency would not be an issue. However, reduced-crude protein (CP) broiler diets demand substantial inclusions of an extended range of non-bound amino acids to meet amino acid requirements. A standard diet may contain 5.0 g/kg non-bound amino acids, but a reduced-CP diet may contain up to 50 g/kg and this relative abundance skews the balance of non-bound to protein-bound amino acids and substantial proportions of certain amino acids are present in diets as non-bound entities. Importantly, tangible reductions in dietary CP, for example from 210 to 160 g/kg, usually both compromise broiler growth performance and increase fat deposition. Compromised growth performance is more evident in wheat- than maize-based diets but, paradoxically, fat deposition is more apparent in maize-based diets. The inability of birds to accommodate tangible dietary CP reductions appears to stem partially from the lack of bioequivalency between non-bound and protein-bound amino acids because of the differentials in intestinal uptake rates. Also, reduced-CP broiler diets generate perturbations in apparent amino acid digestibility coefficients which compound the fact that intestinal uptakes of non-bound acid acids are more rapid, and occur more anteriorly in the small intestine, than protein-bound amino acids. The likelihood is that greater proportions of non-bound amino acids transit the enterocytes of the gut mucosa without entering anabolic and/or catabolic pathways to gain entry to the portal circulation. This culminates in post-enteral amino acid imbalances and postprandial oxidation of surplus amino acids which involves deamination of amino acids and elevations in plasma ammonia (NH3) concentrations, but NH3 is inherently toxic and demands detoxification. Excessive deamination coupled with inadequate detoxification could result in ‘ammonia overload’ which would be expected to compromise growth performance. Thus, the hypothesis is that non-bound and protein-bound amino acids are not bioequivalent; moreover, it may be argued that this distinction is being overlooked and is thwarting the development and acceptance of reduced-CP broiler diets.

Keywords
amino acids
broiler chickens
digestive dynamics
protein
Figures
Fig. 1.
Share
Back to top