IMR Press / RCM / Volume 24 / Issue 8 / DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2408230
Open Access Systematic Review
The Efficacy and Safety of Proton Pump Inhibitors Combining Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Show Less
1 Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
2 Department of Cardiology, The Sixth People’s Hospital of Chengdu, 610072 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
3 Department of Gastroentrology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
4 Research Center of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
5 Division of Biliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China
*Correspondence: huanghe@wchscu.cn (He Huang); heyong_huaxi@163.com (Yong He)
These authors contributed equally.
Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 24(8), 230; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2408230
Submitted: 30 November 2022 | Revised: 4 March 2023 | Accepted: 20 March 2023 | Published: 9 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Pharmacological Treatments of Acute Coronary Syndromes)
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used to prevent gastrointestinal hemorrhage in patients with coronary treatment undergoing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Methods: A systematic review was performed to compare the outcomes between DAPT and DAPT + PPI in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients or patients who took percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary stent implantation (PCI patients), and to estimate, for the first time, the sample size needed for reliable results via trial sequential analysis (TSA). The PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for articles authored from the onset until November 1, 2022, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes in ACS or PCI patients who undertook DAPT or DAPT + PPI. The primary outcomes were the incidence rate of gastrointestinal events and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Results: The initial web search retrieved 786 literature references. Eventually, eight articles published between 2009 and 2020 were incorporated into the systematic review and meta-analysis. The combined results established a non-significant variation in MACEs incidences between the DAPT group and DAPT + PPI group [risk ratio (RR) = 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.81–1.06, p = 0.27, I2 = 0%]; conversely, the incidence of gastrointestinal events was significantly decreased in the DAPT + PPI group in comparison with the DAPT group (RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.24–0.45, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%). TSA of MACEs and gastrointestinal events revealed that meta-analysis included adequate trials (required sample size = 6874) in the pool to achieve 80% study power. Conclusions: Based on our results, DAPT + PPI can significantly reduce gastrointestinal outcomes without affecting cardiovascular outcomes in PCI and ACS patients compared to DAPT.

Keywords
proton pump inhibitors
acute coronary syndrome
meta-analyses
dual antiplatelet therapy
sequential trial analysis
Funding
2017JY0026/Applied and fundamental study of Sichuan Province
2020M683325/Fellowship of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
2020HXBH048/Post-Doctor Research Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Q20061/Innovative scientific research project of medical youth in Sichuan Province
2022YFS0357/Key Research and the Development Programs of Sichuan Province
Figures
Fig. 1.
Share
Back to top