IMR Press / RCM / Volume 23 / Issue 11 / DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2311382
Open Access Review
Cardiorespiratory Fitness in the Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease
Show Less
1 Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo – SUNY, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA
*Correspondence: mlamonte@buffalo.edu (Michael J. LaMonte)
Academic Editor: Lee Stoner
Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 23(11), 382; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2311382
Submitted: 20 July 2022 | Revised: 30 September 2022 | Accepted: 12 October 2022 | Published: 15 November 2022
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death among adults in the U.S. and elsewhere. Variation in the presence, severity, and control of major modifiable risk factors accounts for much of the variation in CVD rates worldwide. Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) reflects the integration of ventilation, circulation, and metabolism for the delivery and utilization of oxygen in support of dynamic aerobic physical activity. The gold standard measure of CRF is maximal oxygen uptake. Because the primary factor underlying differences in this measure between individuals is maximal cardiac output, it can serve as a clinical indicator of cardiac function. Higher CRF is associated with favorable levels of major CVD risk factors, lower prevalence and severity of subclinical atherosclerosis, and lower risks of developing both primary and secondary clinical CVD events. The beneficial associations between CRF and CVD are seen in women and men, older and younger adults, in those with multiple coexisting risk factors or prior diagnosis of CVD. Exercise training and regular physical activity of at least moderate intensities and volumes improves CRF in adults, and improvements in CRF are associated with lower risks of subsequent CVD and mortality. Routine assessment of CRF in primary care settings could enhance individual-level CVD risk assessment and thereby guide implementation of appropriate measures to prevent future clinical events.

Keywords
heart disease
exercise
physical activity
maximal oxygen uptake
risk assessment
exercise prescription
prognosis
1. Introduction

Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a strong, independent predictor of future cardiovascular clinical events and mortality [1, 2, 3]. When measured carefully in a clinical setting, CRF has been more strongly associated with cardiovascular outcomes than other exercise test responses including patient symptoms, electrocardiographic and hemodynamic factors [4, 5]. CRF reflects assimilation of anatomical, physiological, biochemical, and neuromuscular inputs that represent far more than an individual’s exercise habits. As such, CRF is considered a hallmark of aging resiliency [6]. While CRF is a recognized biomarker of physical function and cardiovascular health, it is not currently included with other established risk factors, such as blood pressure or cholesterol, in clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk assessment. Routine assessment of CRF in primary care settings not only will provide the physician with valuable clinical data on their patient’s health status, but could potentially foster health behavior changes to improve CRF knowing that it is part of the annual health record along with body weight, blood pressure, and other vital signs [5].

Background

Beginning around 1950, numerous scientific publications have documented the relationship of physical activity (PA) and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) with cardiovascular health and disease [1, 2, 3]. Not surprising, these investigations have differed substantially with respect to study population, size and design, the cardiovascular outcome investigated, and the type of assessment used to measure PA or CRF. Nevertheless, the overwhelming finding among the studies of higher quality (e.g., adequate sample size and statistical power, well-documented quantification of PA or CRF) has been consistency in cardiovascular health benefits associated with higher levels of activity and fitness. Because of their relatively high prevalence at the population level, the population attributable risk (e.g., percentage of disease cases attributed to a risk factor) for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality associated with sedentary behavior and low CRF is comparable to that of other major modifiable cardiovascular risk factors such as hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and smoking [7, 8]. Table 1 (Ref. [7]) illustrates this showing population attributable risks of CVD mortality for low CRF and other modifiable CVD risk factors in adults ages 18–98 years who were without known CVD or cancer and followed an average of 17 years [7]. Assuming the association between CRF and CVD mortality is causal, if all individuals with low CRF improved to even moderate levels of CRF then 1 in 4 CVD deaths among women and men each in this population might have been avoided. Only hypertension accounted for a high proportion of deaths therein. While population attributable risk is a theoretical estimate, it does bring into context the force an exposure exerts on population health which depends on the amount of exposure and the strength of its association with CVD [9]. Because of the relatively high prevalence of low CRF and its strong association with CVD mortality, the potential population effect for delaying CVD mortality through increases in CRF is considerable. Indeed, leading authorities assert that low CRF could be the biggest public health threat of the 21st century [10] and, as such, CRF should be considered a standard clinical vital sign assessed regularly and targeted for modification just like other conventional risk factors monitored for cardiovascular health [11]. Because measured CRF is less prone to misclassification resulting from response biases or behavioral reactivity as compared to self-reported or directly monitored PA habits, CRF may better reflect the adverse consequences of a sedentary lifestyle [12]. This might not only be because due to more reliable measurement than reported PA levels, but also because CRF may better reflect the combined effects of genetics and behavior in determining an individual’s health status.

Table 1.Population attributable risk (PAR%) of CVD mortality.
Men (N = 40,872) Women (N = 12,943)
Risk Factor Pe HR (95% CI) PAR% Pe HR (95% CI) PAR%
Low CRF 42.9 2.78 (2.29, 2.89) 29.9 41.2 3.32 (2.31, 4.78) 28.8
Self-reported sedentary 52.7 1.27 (1.11, 1.42) 11.2 51.9 1.36 (0.93, 1.99) 13.7
Obesity 19.3 2.08 (1.81, 2.39) 9.9 13.7 3.01 (1.82, 4.97) 9.2
Current smoker 25.5 1.51 (1.33, 1.72) 8.6 19.1 1.61 (1.03, 2.51) 7.2
Hypertension 56.9 2.23 (1.99, 2.49) 31.4 50.4 3.24 (2.29, 4.57) 34.8
Hypercholesterolemia 43.2 1.68 (1.51, 1.88) 17.4 38.2 1.68 (1.18, 2.39) 15.5
Diabetes 15.8 2.26 (1.94, 2.62) 8.8 9.2 3.55 (1.96, 6.44) 6.6
HR (95% CI) adjusted for age and examination year. Pe, prevalence of exposure in decedents; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. PAR% calculated as Pe (1 - 1/HR).
Adapted from LaMonte MJ. Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease. In: JL Durstine, GE Moore, MJ LaMonte, BA Franklin (eds.) Pollock’s Textbook of Cardiovascular Disease and Rehabilitation (pp. 9–22). Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL. 2008. [7].

The objective of this report is to overview the cardiovascular health benefits associated with greater levels of CRF in both primary and secondary CVD prevention. Key points will be illustrated using results from selected individual studies that are frequently cited in consensus statements and systematic reviews. Streams of evidence from both observational and experimental studies will be discussed when possible.

2. Defining Cardiorespiratory Fitness

CRF is one of several physiological attributes collectively referred to as physical fitness, the other attributes being body composition, muscular strength and endurance, agility, balance, and reaction time [13]. CRF (also referred to as cardiovascular, cardiopulmonary, aerobic, or endurance fitness) reflects the ability of the cardiopulmonary system to supply oxygen to working skeletal muscles, and of muscles to effectively utilize oxygen to support performance of dynamic PA [13]. CRF, thus, reflects an integrated system that links ventilation (O2 intake, CO2 emission), circulation (O2 delivery, CO2 removal), and metabolism (O2 utilization, CO2 production) as depicted in Fig. 1. The gold standard measurement of CRF is the maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2max) defined as the rate of oxygen utilization per minute standardized per kilogram body weight (e.g., mL O2 •kg-1•min-1) [4, 13, 14]. V˙O2max is a product of stroke volume × heart rate × arterio-venous O2 difference, where stroke volume is determined by left ventricular diastolic relaxation efficiency, myocardial and pericardial compliance; heart rate is determined by sympathetic nervous system outflow; and arterio-venous O2 difference is determined by skeletal muscle energetic efficiency [15, 16]. Variation in V˙O2max across populations generally results from differences in maximal cardiac output, which is determined by maximal stroke volume and heart rate. Factors influencing CRF include age, sex, health status, and genetics; however, the principal modifiable factor is habitual PA level. CRF responses to a standardized dose of aerobic exercise training vary widely among individuals, and the observed heterogeneity is not random but rather aggregates in families through both genetic and environmental components [17]. Nevertheless, in most individuals and particularly among those who are sedentary, increases in PA result in increases in CRF, whereas CRF declines soon after cessation of PA [13]. Thus, CRF has been used as an objective surrogate measure of recent PA patterns [18].

Fig. 1.

Ventilation Circulation Metabolism. VE, minute ventilation; VF, ventilatory frequency; VT, tidal volume; CO2, carbon dioxide; O2, oxygen; CO, cardiac output; SV, stroke volume; HR, heart rate; a-vO2, arterial-venous oxygen difference.

In clinical settings CRF is often used as a measure of exercise tolerance or physical functioning capacity expressed as metabolic equivalent (METs) or multiples of resting oxygen uptake [4, 19]. One MET (resting oxygen uptake) is assumed over a wide adult age range to be 3.5 mL O2 •kg-1•min-1. An individual with a 5 MET level of CRF is capable of maximal exertion equivalent to 5-times that of resting energy expenditure (e.g., 17.5 mL O2•kg-1•min-1); a 10 MET level of CRF is 10-times resting energy expenditure (e.g., 35 mL O2 •kg-1•min-1). In a clinical context, low maximal MET levels of CRF, such as 3 METs (e.g., inability to complete Stage I of the Bruce treadmill protocol), are used to identify patients with severe cardiac failure who qualify for heart transplantation [20], whereas a 10 MET maximal CRF (e.g., completion of Stage III of the Bruce protocol) identifies exceptionally good prognosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease regardless of number of diseased vessels or presence of exercise-induced ischemic electrocardiographic sequalae [21]. By contrast, elite athletes can have exceptionally high maximal MET levels of CRF, such as 17 METs (elite soccer), 22.5 METs (elite cycling) and 24.1 METs (elite distance running) [22, 23, 24]. Table 2 (Ref. [25]) gives sex- and age-specific expected maximal levels of CRF for apparently healthy adults without known CVD who completed symptom-limited maximal exercise treadmill testing as part of an elective preventive medical examination at the Cooper Clinic (Dallas, TX, USA) [25]. CRF is clearly inversely related with age and is higher in men than women at a given age. While it had long been thought that CRF declines by about 1% per year over the adult age range [26], recent longitudinal studies have shown that CRF does not decline linearly with age, but rather there are accelerations in loss of CRF beginning around age 60 and again thereafter [27, 28], a trend attributed in large to loss of lean body mass with aging [27]. The limited available data describing secular trends indicate an apparent increase in CRF among U.S. adults during the 1970s to about 1990 followed by a slight decline during the early 2000s [29, 30]. The latter observation parallels the declines among Swedish [31] and Canadian [32] adults during the first two decades of the 2000s.

Table 2.Maximal CRF levels for apparently healthy men and women.
Age (years) Percentile Men Women
mL O2/kg/min METs mL O2/kg/min METs
20–39 20th (low) <36.4 <10.4 <28.7 <8.2
20th–40th 36.4–40.9 10.4–11.7 28.7–32.9 8.2–9.4
40th–60th 40.9–45.6 11.7–13.1 32.9–36.4 9.4–10.4
60th–80th 45.6–50.4 13.1–14.4 36.4–40.9 10.4–11.7
80th (high) >50.4 >14.4 >40.9 >11.7
40–49 20th (low) <34.7 <9.9 <26.6 <7.6
20th–40th 34.7–37.8 9.9–10.8 26.6–29.8 7.6–8.5
40th–60th 37.8–42.7 10.8–12.2 29.8–32.9 8.5–9.4
60th–80th 42.7–47.3 12.2–13.5 32.9–37.8 9.4–10.8
80th (high) >47.3 >13.5 >37.8 >10.8
50–59 20th (low) <29.8 <8.5 <23.5 <6.7
20th–40th 29.8–34.7 8.5–9.9 23.5–26.6 6.7–7.6
40th–60th 34.7–37.8 9.9–10.8 26.6–29.8 7.6–8.5
60th–80th 37.8–43.1 10.8–12.3 29.8–33.6 8.5–9.6
80th (high) >43.1 >12.3 >33.6 >9.6
60 20th (low) <25.2 <7.2 <20.3 <5.8
20th–40th 25.2–29.8 7.2–8.5 20.3–23.5 5.8–6.7
40th–60th 29.8–33.3 8.5–9.5 23.5–26.6 6.7–7.6
60th–80th 33.3–37.8 9.5–10.8 26.6–30.1 7.6–8.6
80th (high) >37.8 >10.8 >30.1 >8.6
METs, metabolic equivalents; 1 MET = 3.5 mL O2 uptake •kg-1•min-1.
Adapted from Sui X, LaMonte MJ, Blair SN. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2007; 65: 1413–1423. [25].
3. Measuring Cardiorespiratory Fitness

CRF can be measured using both submaximal and maximal exercise tests and a variety of testing modalities in laboratory and field settings [19, 33, 34]. Direct quantification of V˙O2max (mL O2 •kg-1•min-1) through analysis of expired gas concentrations at maximal physical exertion is the gold standard measure of CRF. Upright maximal exercise testing using a calibrated motor-driven clinical treadmill or electronically-braked cycle ergometer is the preferred testing modality, with V˙O2max being 10–25% higher during treadmill ergometry because of the larger skeletal muscle mass engaged and the premature termination of cycle tests because of localized leg muscle fatigue during a less familiar form of activity for many adults [34]. When direct measurement of V˙O2max is not feasible, submaximal and maximal exercise tests can be used to estimate V˙O2max based on achieved physiological responses (e.g., heart rate) or workloads (e.g., cycle ergometer watts; treadmill speed and grade). Maximal testing is more burdensome as it requires participants to reach an endpoint of volitional exhaustion and in some circumstances may require specialized medical equipment and trained personnel to ensure participant safety. Nevertheless, the sensitivity of estimated CRF is highest when maximal exertion (or near maximal, e.g., >85% age-predicted heart rate maximum and/or >17 on a 20 point Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale) is achieved, particularly when comparing repeated assessments (e.g., change in CRF) among populations. Several submaximal tests of CRF have been used in clinical and research settings including step tests (e.g., Harvard Step Test; Canadian Fitness Test), cycle ergometry tests (e.g., Astrand-Rhyming single-stage; YMCA multi-stage), treadmill tests (e.g., Taylor-U.S. Railroad Study single-stage; Pollock-Wilmore two-stage), and walk tests (e.g., Cooper 12-minute or 1.5 mile test; Rockport 1 mile test). When ergometer (e.g., treadmill, cycle, step) testing is utilized a key assumption underlying predicted V˙O2max is that steady-rate metabolism (e.g., heart rate, ventilation) was achieved during each stage of the test. Furthermore, because stroke volume plateaus at relatively low work rates, the higher the steady-rate submaximal heart rate (hence, cardiac output) achieved during the final test stage the greater the accuracy in V˙O2max prediction.

Shorter timed walk tests, such as the 400 meter and 6-minute walk, are readily used in clinical and epidemiological settings to assess physical function status as well as to predict V˙O2max with reasonably high accuracy when compared against directly measured V˙O2max (e.g., R2 = 0.71–0.76; SEE <1.5 METs) [35, 36]. The choice of performance-based test to assess CRF will depend on available equipment and testing personnel, population being studied, participant burden and safety, and time and budget constraints. Non-exercise test prediction models also have been developed using a variety of demographic, lifestyle, and clinical factors for use when performance-based assessment is not feasible [37, 38]. Approaches previously used to assess CRF in studies on CVD incidence and prognosis include direct measurement of V˙O2max [39, 40], maximal [41, 42] and submaximal [43, 44] treadmill and cycle ergometry, step testing [45], timed walk tests [46, 47], and non-exercise test equations [48, 49]. Fig. 2 (Ref. [34]) shows expected values of oxygen uptake associated with various testing modalities and workloads.

Fig. 2.

Oxygen uptake according to various workloads and exercise testing modality. O2, oxygen; mL, milliliters; kg, kilogram; min, minute; METs, metabolic equivalents; kpm, kilopond meters; mph, miles per hour; sec, second; GR, grade; USAFSAM, United States Airforce School of Aerospace Medicine; ACIP, Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot. Adapted from ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia. 2006. [34].

4. CRF and Development of CVD

Atherosclerosis, the underlying disease process of most CVD deaths in U.S. adults, is a complex process that starts early in life and progresses over decades in a subclinical state before manifestation of clinical CVD events in mid- to later life [7]. Interaction of environmental factors and individual-level susceptibility traits lead to development of major modifiable CVD risk factors which initiate formation of atherosclerotic lesions within the coronary arteries. If unchecked, the disease progresses and eventually presents clinically as angina, myocardial infarction, or sudden cardiac death. As illustrated in Fig. 3, there are several plausible pathways through which higher CRF impacts the initiation and progression of atherosclerotic CVD for both primary and secondary prevention of clinical CVD events. The following sections will briefly review evidence supporting this conceptual framework.

Fig. 3.

Conceptual framework of CRF pathways to CVD prevention.

4.1 CRF and CVD Risk Factors

Variation in the presence, severity, and control of major modifiable CVD risk factors is a principal determinant of differences in CVD burden between populations [50, 51]. In the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2007 and 2018, trajectories for some modifiable risk factors (current smoking, leisure-time physical activity, serum total cholesterol) showed significant improvement whereas other risk factors (body mass index, dietary intake, blood pressure, serum glucose and hemoglobin A1c) worsened during the same time interval [52]. Variation in CVD risk factors was clearly evident according to subgroups defined by age (worse in older adults) and race and ethnicity (worse in black compared to white and Hispanic adults). While widespread use of pharmacotherapies to control major CVD risk factors is likely benefiting certain factors (e.g., lipids [53]), there remains a substantial burden of untoward risk factors in the population that will increase with an aging society and will translate into higher frequency of clinical CVD events if not brought into check [54]. Use of nonpharmacologic behavioral strategies to enhance risk factor control is, therefore, of high importance to preventive cardiology and public health.

4.1.1 Risk Factor Prevalence

Higher CRF is associated with favorable levels of traditional CVD risk factors in cross-sectional studies of women and men with [55, 56] and without [56, 57, 58] existing CVD. Fig. 4 (Ref. [56]) shows inverse associations for CRF, assessed by maximal treadmill testing, with prevalence of clinically relevant CVD risk factors [56]. CRF is also associated with lower prevalence of coexisting cardiometabolic factors, metabolic syndrome [59, 60], in cohorts of middle-aged adults who were without known CVD at examination. The inverse association between CRF and prevalent metabolic syndrome is quite steep. Among 7104 women whose mean age was 44 years at the time of completing a symptom-limited maximal treadmill fitness test, the age, smoking, and exam year-adjusted prevalence of metabolic syndrome across incremental quintiles of CRF was 19%, 6.7%, 6.0%, 3.6%, and 2.3%, respectively (Trend, p < 0.01) [61]. A similar inverse pattern of association was seen among women within each decade category of age between 40 and 80 years.

Fig. 4.

Cross-sectional associations between CRF and clinically relevant CVD risk factors in (A) Men and (B) Women. Odds ratios adjusted for age, percent body fat, smoking, and family history of CVD. BP, blood pressure; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Adapted from LaMonte MJ et al., Circulation. 2000; 102(14): 1623–1628. [56].

CRF has also been associated with other biomarkers of cardiovascular health. Higher CRF is favorably related to pulse wave velocity [62] and coronary arterial diameter [63] and dilating capacity [64] (measures of arterial compliance), heart rate variability [65, 66] (measure of cardiac autonomic function), pericardial adipose deposition [67], and measures of cardiac size and function in adults residing in the community setting [68, 69, 70, 71, 72]. In one study that evaluated nitroglycerin-induced coronary vasodilation between runners and sedentary controls, there was a 2-fold greater increase in arterial cross-sectional area following nitroglycerin in runners that correlated (r = 0.68) strongly with V˙O2max [64]. Cross-sectional studies in adults without known CVD indicated that higher CRF is associated with lower concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and fibrinogen [73, 74], and cardiac troponin-T, a biomarker of subclinical myocardial injury [75]. In a study of 722 middle-aged men without known CVD, the multivariable-adjusted prevalence of elevated C-reactive protein (2.0 mg/L) was 50% and 18% in the lowest and highest CRF quintile, respectively (Trend, p < 0.001), a pattern of association observed even in men with abdominal obesity (waist girth 102 cm) [73]. In patients with existing atherosclerotic CVD or myocardial dysfunction, CRF tends to be inversely related with cardiac biomarkers [76, 77, 78]. Associations between CRF and CVD risk factors, cardiac biomarkers, and cardiac function have generally been independent of measures of adiposity [72, 73, 74] including directly measured visceral adiposity [79, 80]. Additional support for these cross-sectional observations comes from a recent meta-analysis showing moderate-to-vigorous intensity exercise training simultaneously improves CRF and several cardiometabolic biomarkers in apparently healthy adults and in those who are obese or have pre-existing health conditions [81].

4.1.2 Risk Factor Incidence

Evidence that CRF levels are predictive of future development of clinically relevant risk factors would provide stronger inferences as compared to the cross-sectional findings reviewed above. However, few studies have examined prospective associations between a measure of CRF and incidence of cardiometabolic risk factors. One of the most comprehensive studies to date was reported in the CARDIA cohort where 2029 men and 2458 women, mean age 25 years at the time of maximal treadmill fitness testing, were followed for 15 years [82]. In analysis adjusted for demographic, anthropometric, family history, and self-reported PA information, the relative risk of incident hypertension, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol among non-obese participants was 1.21, 1.26, 1.28, and 1.08 (p < 0.05, all) for each 1-minute decrement (lower CRF) in treadmill test duration. Associations remained significant among obese individuals except for incident diabetes and hypercholesterolemia which attenuated to the null. Another 6-year prospective cohort study on 9007 men and 1491 women whose mean age was 44 years when completing maximal treadmill tests, observed inverse gradients (p < 0.001, each) in age-adjusted rates of incident metabolic syndrome over incremental tertiles of CRF in both women (10.4, 6.7, 3.1 per 1000) and men (44.1, 24.8, 13.5 per 1000) [83]. Even among those with 2 of the minimum required 3 prevalent factors for metabolic syndrome diagnosis, inverse multivariable-adjusted relative risks were evident with greater CRF (Fig. 5, Ref. [83]) suggesting that adequate fitness in mid-life might be especially effective in preventing later development of metabolic syndrome the prevalence of which rises sharply with age [84]. Additional corroboration comes from aerobic exercise training studies that have shown significant contemporaneous improvements in V˙O2max, CVD risk factors, and metabolic syndrome prevalence among middle-aged adults [85, 86, 87].

Fig. 5.

Prospective associations between CRF and incident metabolic syndrome according to number of components at baseline. Hazard ratios adjusted for age, exam year, BMI, smoking, alcohol, family history of CVD and diabetes. Adapted from LaMonte MJ et al., Circulation. 2005; 112(4): 505–512. [83].

4.2 CRF and Subclinical Atherosclerosis

The ability to characterize atherosclerotic CVD while in its subclinical stage provides new opportunities for arresting disease progression and preventing clinical CVD events [88]. Several measures of subclinical disease have been used in epidemiological and clinical investigations, some of which have been evaluated against CRF levels. Higher CRF is associated with fewer resting and exercise electrocardiographic indicators of obstructive coronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic adults [25, 47, 89]. An extensive analysis on 3722 Korean men, ages 40 and older without clinical CVD, included measurements of V˙O2max, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (arterial compliance), carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), and coronary artery calcification (CAC; Agatston score) [90]. Each 1-MET higher CRF was associated with a 23% (p < 0.001) greater multivariable odds ratio for a composite healthy vascular outcome variable. Inverse associations between CRF and the heathy vascular outcome were seen over ages 40–49, 50–59, and 60 years, and in subsets of men with CAC >100 and IMT >0.8 mm. A cross-sectional study on 7300 German adults (mean 46) without CVD showed significant inverse gradients in mean IMT across incremental quartiles of measured V˙O2max in both women and men [91]. Likewise, prospective studies have shown significant inverse associations between mid-life CRF and future IMT values indicative carotid artery disease [92, 93]. CRF is significantly associated with presence of any CAC (CAC >0), and a 41% lower multivariable-adjusted odds ratio when comparing the highest and lowest tertiles of CRF [94]. Among older British and U.S. adults faster timed walk test scores were significantly inversely associated with CAC score (Fig. 6, Ref. [95]) and IMT values in both women and men [95, 96]. In a 6-year moderate-intensity aerobic exercise training study, significant improvements in V˙O2max and IMT were observed among men who were without clinical CVD and not taking statin medication [97]. A 4-year study on women in the menopausal transition similarly showed that aerobic exercise training significantly slowed IMT progression [98]. Collectively, the above findings suggest that fitness levels are correlated with subclinical atherosclerosis, and in turn, increasing CRF could potentially limit the severity and progression of subclinical CVD.

Fig. 6.

Average walking speed over 8 feet according to coronary arterial calcification score. Adapted from Hamer M et al., Heart. 2010; 96(5): 380–384. [95].

4.3 CRF and Incidence of Clinical CVD Events

A large body of epidemiological evidence supports inverse associations between CRF and the incidence of several primary clinical CVD outcomes [1, 2, 3]. Additionally, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that aerobic exercise training in medically managed patients with existing CVD is safe and efficacious in the secondary prevention of recurrent events and mortality [99, 100, 101]. Guidelines have been published regarding the type, amount, and intensity of PA required to improve CRF and clinical cardiovascular status in both primary and secondary prevention settings [13, 34].

4.3.1 CRF and Primary CVD Prevention

CVD Mortality. The seminal work was contributed by Blair and coworkers who followed 13,344 adults ages 20–88 years for about 8 years after completion of a maximal treadmill fitness test and showed steep inverse gradients in age-adjusted rates of CVD mortality across incremental CRF tertiles in men (24.6, 7.8, 3.1 per 10,000; Trend p < 0.05) and women (7.4, 2.9, 0.8 per 10,000; Trend p = 0.09) [41]. The asymptote of the dose-response curve between CRF and all-cause mortality was 9 and 10 METs for women and men, respectively. Given that CVD accounted for the majority of deaths, it is likely that these same MET levels of CRF would be reasonable targets for primary CVD prevention, although many individuals might obtain benefit at even lower levels. In the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease and Risk Factor Study, 1294 Finnish men ages 40–60 years had their V˙O2max measured and were then followed 10 years for CVD mortality [39]. Fig. 7 (Ref. [39]) shows the strong inverse association between measured V˙O2max and CVD mortality, indicating a more than 3-fold higher mortality risk in men whose V˙O2max was <7.9 METs compared to those with >10.6 METs. A separate investigation in the Finnish study showed each 1-MET increment in V˙O2max was associated with a 22% (p < 0.001) lower multivariable-adjusted relative risk for sudden cardiac death [102]. In the Nord-Trondelag Norwegian cohort, each 1-MET increment in measured V˙O2max was associated with a 17% (p < 0.05) and 12% (not significant) lower risk of CHD mortality in men and women, respectively [103]. A 20-year follow-up on 2994 women ages 30–80 who completed treadmill fitness testing as part of the Lipid Research Clinics Prevalence Study showed each 1-MET lower CRF was associated with a 17% greater (p < 0.01) multivariable-adjusted risk of CVD mortality [89], a magnitude of association for the same difference in CRF similar to men reported above and elsewhere [104].

Fig. 7.

Prospective association of measured maximal oxygen uptake and exercise test duration with CVD mortality in men. Relative risks adjusted for age and examination year. Adapted from Laukkanen JA, et al., Archives of Internal Medicine. 2001; 161: 825–831. [39].

Stroke Mortality. In an exceptionally large cohort of 1,166,035 Swedish men whose CRF was measured using maximal cycle ergometry at the time of entry into the military and who were followed 42 years for fatal stroke, the multivariable relative risks (95% CI) in the lowest and middle CRF tertile were 1.62 (1.35, 1.93) and 2.52 (1.82, 3.50), respectively, compared to high CRF [105]. Multivariable-adjusted relative risks for stroke mortality across incremental quartiles were 1.00, 0.47, 0.59, 0.50, Trend p = 0.004 in men and 1.00, 0.71, 0.62, 0.43, Trend p = 0.09 in women who completed maximal treadmill fitness testing in mid-life and were followed 17 years thereafter [106].

Non-fatal CVD. The vast majority of investigations on CRF and CVD have evaluated fatal events as the study outcome. However, the role of CRF in development on nonfatal clinical events is a critical piece of the primary prevention framework. A 10-year follow-up subsequent to maximal treadmill fitness testing showed significant inverse multivariable relative risks over tertiles of CRF for nonfatal total CVD (1.00, 0.89, 0.75, p = 0.001), CHD (1.00, 0.89, 0.76, p = 0.001), MI (1.00, 0.87, 0.73, p = 0.02), and stroke (1.00, 0.90, 0.71, p = 0.04) in 20,728 middle-aged men [25]. Among 5909 women in this study, inverse associations between CRF and each nonfatal endpoint were observed but did not achieve statistical significance due to the relatively small number of case counts. In Finnish men, each 1-MET increment in measured V˙O2max was associated with relative risks of 0.87 (p < 0.001), 0.90 (p = 0.002), and 0.75 (p < 0.001) for nonfatal MI, stroke, and heart failure, respectively [107].

Population Subgroups. The protective association between CRF and clinical CVD events also is apparent in higher risk clinical subgroups. In 40,718 men without CVD, significant inverse associations between CRF and CHD mortality were observed in categories of <100, 100–129, 130–159, 160–189, and 190 mg/dL of fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [108]. In women and men with 2 or more coexisting major CVD risk factors, higher CRF is associated with lower rates of nonfatal CVD events (Fig. 8) [25]. Among men with type 2 diabetes the 15-year cumulative probability of CVD mortality was substantially higher at 20% in those who were obese (BMI 30) compared to 10% in those with normal weight (BMI <25) [109]. However, in a multivariable-adjusted analysis that controlled for fasting glucose concentrations, the relative risk (95% CI) among obese men with moderate/high CRF was 1.5 (0.6, 3.6) and not statistically significant, whereas among men with low CRF it was 2.8 (1.4, 5.6), p < 0.01. Among men with normal weight, relative risks in men with high, moderate, and low CRF were 1.00, 2.3, 2.7, Trend p < 0.001. These results suggest that higher CRF might mitigate some of CVD risk conferred by type 2 diabetes including in those who are obese. Even in men with prognostically significant subclinical coronary atherosclerosis defined by CAC 400, the multivariable relative risk of combined fatal and nonfatal CHD was 0.23 (p < 0.01) in those with 10 MET compared to <10 MET levels of CRF [110]. The absolute risk of CVD events increases and CRF decreases with age [7, 27], thus with population aging the burden of CVD attributed to low CRF will increase. Strategies to maintain healthy CRF levels in later life could be an important risk reducing strategy. Among 1789 older adults enrolled in the Rancho Bernardo aging cohort who completed a treadmill fitness test, lower CRF was associated with a 72% (p < 0.05) greater risk of CHD mortality [111]. In another study on 4060 adults 60 years, strong inverse associations were observed between CRF and rates of CVD mortality within 10-year age categories (Fig. 9) [112]. Among those in the oldest age group (80 years), each 1-MET increment in CRF was associated with a 67% (p = 0.03) lower multivariable-adjusted CVD mortality risk.

Fig. 8.

Prospective association between CRF and CVD incidence according to number of major CVD risk factors present at baseline. Rates are adjusted for age and examination year. PY, person-years. Adapted from Sui X et al., American Journal of Epidemiology. 2007; 165: 1413–1423. [25].

Fig. 9.

Prospective association between CRF and CVD mortality according to age at baseline. Rates are adjusted for sex and examination year. PY, person-years. Adapted from Sui X et al., Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2007; 55: 1940–1947. [112].

Alternative CRF Indices. Several indicators of the hemodynamic and autonomic response to exercise also have been associated with CVD risk. These measures include insufficient increase in heart rate during exercise (chronotropic incompetence) and a slow heart rate recovery following exercise, and abnormal blood pressure responses during and after exercise. A prospective study on 1910 male veterans showed that failure to achieve at least 80% of age-predicted maximal heart rate during treadmill exercise testing was associated with a 2.8-fold (p < 0.001), whereas heart rate decreases of 22 beats at 2 minutes of recovery post-exercise was associated with a 2-fold (p = 0.02), higher risk of CVD mortality [113]. Men with both abnormalities had more than a 4-fold (p < 0.001) elevated CVD risk. Use of beta-blockers did not reduce the strength of these associations. Among 10,323 women and men without known CVD, compared to those achieving >99% of age-predicted maximal heart rate, the relative risk of incident CVD events was 1.24 (p = 0.02) and 1.61 (p < 0.001) in those achieving 96.6%–98.8% and 60.5%–96.5%, respectively, suggesting that additional risk might be harbored in adults with even modest chronotropic reductions during maximal effort [114]. A hypertensive response during maximal cycle ergometry testing was associated with a 34% (p < 0.05) and 19% (p < 0.05) higher risk of stroke and CVD, respectively [115], whereas each 100 mmHg higher systolic blood pressure at 2 minutes after maximal exercise was associated with a 7% (p = 0.001) greater risk of MI [116] in studies on men without known CVD at the time of testing.

4.3.2 CRF and Secondary CVD Prevention

Higher CRF in individuals who already have had a clinical CVD event is an important prognostic factor. In both women and men completing supervised cardiac rehabilitation following a clinical coronary event, V˙O2max 3.7 METs in women and 4.3 METs in men was associated with 40–60% (p < 0.001) lower relative risks of mortality from all-causes and from cardiac causes [117, 118]. Further contribution in this area of work was made by Myers et al. [42] in their large prospective study on men with existing CVD who completed maximal treadmill tests at the Palo Alto Veteran’s Affairs Hospital. A steep inverse gradient in age-adjusted relative risks of all-cause mortality across incremental quintiles of CRF was observed, with more than a 4-fold (p < 0.05) greater risk in men with 1.0–4.9 METs compared to 10.7 MET levels of CRF (Fig. 10, Ref. [42]). While maximal CRF was lower than in men without CVD, overall, each 1-MET increment in CRF was associated with a 9% (p < 0.001) lower mortality risk in this secondary prevention cohort. In another cohort of men completing maximal cycle tests soon after an uncomplicated coronary event, each 1-liter/min increment in V˙O2max was associated with 57% and 71% lower risks of all-cause and CVD mortality, respectively [40]. Even in men with prognostically relevant reductions in left ventricular function (ejection fraction (EF) <40%) after ST-elevation MI, achieving 4 METs on a maximal cycle ergometry test was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality at 2- and 5-years post-testing [119]. The benefit of higher CRF in heart failure patients is not mitigated by beta-blocker use. Among heart failure patients with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 20%, each 1-mL O2 •kg-1•min-1 was associated with a 26% and 13% higher risk of all-cause mortality with and without beta-blocker use, respectively [120]. The significance of higher V˙O2max in relation to enhanced prognosis in heart failure patients is seen across a wide range of age. CRF greater than 10 mL O2 •kg-1•min-1 is associated with 13%, 15%, and 16% lower mortality (p < 0.001, all) in heart failure patients aged 45, 46–64, and 65 years, respectively [121]. Two large randomized controlled exercise training trials have shown clear and strong evidence that moderate volumes and intensities of PA can improve CRF in medically managed heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction [122, 123].

Fig. 10.

Prospective association between CRF and all-cause mortality in men with and without CVD. Relative risks are adjusted for age. Adapted from Meyers J et al., New England Journal of Medicine. 2002; 346: 793–801. [42].

4.3.3 Changes in CRF and CVD Outcomes

Studies evaluating longitudinal changes in CRF in relation to CVD outcomes provide a stronger test of the hypothesis than do those based on only a single assessment of CRF. Changes in CRF over two assessments are associated with significantly lower risks of developing major CVD risk factors including hypertension, diabetes, elevated cholesterol, and metabolic syndrome, to a large extent independent of changes in body weight [82, 124]. In a follow-up on 2014 men ages 40–50 at first of two maximal cycle ergometry assessments, the multivariable-adjusted relative risks over incremental quartiles of CRF change were 1.00, 0.64, 0.53, and 0.40 (p < 0.05, all) for incident ischemic stroke and were 1.00, 0.61, 0.55, and 0.49 (p < 0.05, all) for mortality [125]. In another study on 9777 middle-aged men, each 1-minute improvement in maximal treadmill exercise time over two assessments (Balke-Ware protocol) was associated with an 8% lower (p = 0.03) multivariable-adjusted risk of CVD mortality [126]. Because CVD risk in the above studies is based on change in CRF, it is less likely that misclassification bias is the primary explanation of the favorable associations with CRF reported in each study.

5. Is CRF More Important than PA?

One argument for CRF being a better reflection of exposure to sedentary lifestyles than self-reported or device-measured PA is less misclassification due to reporting biases and incomplete assessment of PA behavior [12]. Because CRF represents an integrated response in several biological systems, including genetics, required to support PA at given levels of effort, CRF might offer a broader representation of the underlying construct at a physiological level. A meta-analysis on observational studies that related either CRF or PA with incident CVD events showed that for both CRF and PA exposures there was a significant inverse pattern of association with CVD risk (p < 0.05, each), but the strength of association for CRF was far greater for CRF than PA, particularly at the lowest end of the exposure distributions where PA measurement precision tends to be poor (Fig. 11) [127].

Fig. 11.

Meta-analysis results of observational studies on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) or physical activity (PA) exposures in relation to the relative risk of clinical CVD events. Exposure percentiles are ranked lowest (0) to highest (100) on the x-axis. Adapted from Williams PT. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2001; 33: 754–761. [127].

Few investigations have included assessments of both CRF and PA in the same study group. In adults ages 18–95 years, V˙O2max and PA measured by self-report or device are modestly correlated (r = 0.12–0.33) with stronger correlations evident when considering vigorous intensity PA [128, 129]. In a cohort of men referred for clinically indicated maximal treadmill testing, self-reported physical inactivity and low CRF (<5 METs) were associated with relative risks for mortality of 1.23 and 2.98 (p < 0.05, each) [8]. In a large cohort of 498,135 British adults, each 5 MET-hr/wk lower amount of self-reported PA was associated with a 1% greater mortality risk whereas each 1-MET lower CRF was associated with an 8% lower risk (p < 0.001, each) [130]. When stratified on tertiles of CRF, greater PA was associated with lower mortality risk only among those in the lowest and middle CRF tertile. Among Finnish men, the relative risk of incident MI was 0.32 (p < 0.001) for a 1-L/min higher V˙O2max and 0.78 (p = 0.01) for a 1-hr/wk higher amount of self-reported conditioning exercise [131]. In 31,818 men and 10,555 women from the U.S., the multivariable-adjusted relative risks for mortality associated with self-reported inactivity, insufficient activity, and recommended activity were 1.00, 0.91, 0.87, Trend p = 0.07 in men and 1.00, 0.92, 0.83, Trend p = 0.52 in women [132]. Adding CRF to the model attenuated the associations essentially to the null. Corresponding associations across incremental tertiles of CRF with adjustment for PA, were 1.00, 0.64, 0.55, Trend p < 0.001 in men, and 1.00, 0.62, 0.61, Trend p = 0.02 in women. While direct comparison of CRF and PA exposures in relation to health risks is challenging for many reasons, the available data provide a fairly clear indication that CRF carries a stronger association than PA for a given clinical outcome when measured in the same group of individuals. Promoting PA at levels sufficient to enhance or maintain healthy CRF [13, 18] is likely to correspond with better cardiovascular health.

6. Should CRF be a Component of Individual-Level CVD Risk Assessment?

In the preceding sections it was clear that CRF is associated with one’s propensity for adverse CVD outcomes. In an office setting, healthcare providers typically rely on multiple risk factor scoring algorithms to determine their patient’s short-term probability of a clinical CVD event and, in turn, guide decisions on initiation and intensity of primary preventive measures [7]. A small number of studies have attempted to quantify the additional prognostic value of adding a measure of CRF to conventional office-based CVD risk calculation (e.g., Framingham Risk Score). Table 3 (Ref. [133]) summarizes results of a study on 41,708 men who were without clinical CVD at the time of baseline examination that included a maximal treadmill fitness test [133]. After 17 years follow-up, each 1-unit increment in Framingham risk score (10-Year predicted probability) was associated with a 6% higher relative risk of CVD and CHD mortality (p < 0.05, each). When CRF was added to the regression model, the relative risks of each outcome associated with the Framingham score attenuated to 1.03 (p < 0.05, each), and the relative risks for a 1-MET decrement in CRF were 1.24 and 1.27 (p < 0.05, each). When men were grouped on clinical categories of Framingham score (<10%, 10–20%, >20% 10-Year probabilities), in all categories the relative risks for CVD and CHD mortality were significantly increased with each 1-MET lower CRF. These findings suggest that clinical CVD risk assessment should not end with assessment of traditional modifiable risk factors, but instead should also include assessment of CRF. Similar findings have been reported in other cohort studies [134, 135, 136] and the issue of how to incorporate CRF assessment into office practice has been discussed in an American Heart Association pronouncement [137].

Table 3.CVD mortality according to framingham risk score and CRF in men.
CVD mortality CHD mortality
(1307 deaths) (792 deaths)
FRS alone*
FRS (per 1-unit increment) 1.06 (1.04, 1.07) 1.06 (1.05, 1.08)
FRS plus CRF*
FRS (per 1-unit increment) 1.03 (1.02, 1.06) 1.02 (1.01, 1.06)
CRF (per 1-MET decrement) 1.24 (1.21, 1.27) 1.27 (1.22, 1.32)
Likelihood ratio statistic 214.6 (p < 0.001) 165.7 (p < 0.001)
Framingham risk score (10-year probability)
<10% 10–20% >20%
(Low risk) (Intermediate risk) (High risk)
CVD death
CRF (per 1-MET decrement) 1.21 (1.15, 1.27) 1.15 (1.10, 1.22) 1.18 (1.10, 1.25)
CHD death
CRF (per 1-MET decrement) 1.21 (1.12, 1.28) 1.22 (1.14, 1.29) 1.16 (1.08, 1.27)
Data are hazard ratio (95% confidence interval).
*Model also includes age, examination year, and family history of CVD.
Model also includes age, examination year, family history of CVD, abnormal electrocardiogram, chronotropic incompetence.
Adapted from LaMonte MJ et al., Circulation. 2005; 112(Suppl II): II-829. [133].
7. Limitations

The overview presented here on CRF and CVD prevention was not an exhaustive review of the published scientific literature nor did it address all possible mechanisms by which greater CRF might enhance cardiovascular health. The exemplar studies discussed were selected to make specific points but may not represent the range of available findings in a given area. Future studies that include both a performance-based measure of CRF and a well-documented assessment of PA would be helpful to clarify the extent to which PA and CRF confer independent cardiovascular benefits, especially in older adults whose maximal CRF is limited. Continued efforts to identify an absolute level of CRF where CVD risk reduction would be expected in apparently healthy adults, and to identify the PA dose required to achieve that level of CRF, is critical to enhancing future public health recommendations on lifestyle behaviors.

8. Conclusions

As depicted conceptually in Fig. 3 and supported by evidence summarized herein, CRF is a modifiable factor associated with multiple paths in CVD incidence and prognosis. The gold standard measure of CRF is the maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2max). Because differences in V˙O2max between individuals is due largely to differences in maximal cardiac output, V˙O2max is a clinical indicator of cardiac function. Not surprisingly, numerous studies have shown that CRF assessed with maximal exercise testing is strongly associated with major CVD risk factors, left ventricular structure and function, coronary and peripheral arterial compliance, and measures of subclinical atherosclerosis. Studies also have shown that CRF adds prognostic value to established multifactor CVD risk prediction models, which are the cornerstone in office-based individual-level risk assessment and prevention. Moderate intensities and volumes of regular PA can improve CRF in both healthy and diseased adults. Because CRF is measured more objectively thsan PA, and because CRF might better reflect the influences of both behavior and genetics on functional status, CRF might be a more accurate indicator of the consequences of a sedentary or irregularly active lifestyle. A public health imperative in this century is to aggressively promote at the population level PA that is sufficient enough to enhance and maintain CRF, and in turn, for healthcare providers to routinely assess and monitor their patients CRF level as done with other clinical vital signs.

Author Contributions

MJL is the sole author and is responsible for conceptualization; content design; writing original draft; review and editing; approval of the published version of the manuscript.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by NHLBI contract 75N92019R0031 and research grants HL151885, HL153462, HL150170, HL130591.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References
[1]
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. 1996.
[2]
Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2008.
[3]
Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2018.
[4]
Fletcher GF, Ades PA, Kligfield P, Arena R, Balady GJ, Bittner VA, et al. Exercise Standards for Testing and Training: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013; 128: 873–934.
[5]
Ross R, Blair SN, Arena R, Church TS, Després J, Franklin BA, et al. Importance of Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Clinical Practice: a Case for Fitness as a Clinical Vital Sign: a Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016; 134: e653–e699.
[6]
Kritchevsky SB, Forman DE, Callahan KE, Ely EW, High KP, McFarland F, et al. Pathways, Contributors, and Correlates of Functional Limitation across Specialties: Workshop Summary. The Journals of Gerontology: Series a. 2019; 74: 534–543.
[7]
LaMonte MJ. Epidemiology of Cardiovascular Disease. In Durstine JL, Moore GE, LaMonte MJ, Franklin BA (eds.) Pollock’s Textbook of Cardiovascular Disease and Rehabilitation (pp. 9–22). Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL. 2008.
[8]
Myers J, Vainshelboim B, Kamil-Rosenberg S, Chan K, Kokkinos P. Physical Activity, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Population-Attributable Risk. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2021; 96: 342–349.
[9]
Powell KE, Blair SN. The public health burdens of sedentary living habits. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1994; 26: 851–856.
[10]
Blair SN. Physical inactivity: the biggest public health problem of the 21st century. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009; 43: 1–2.
[11]
Kondamudi N, Mehta A, Thangada ND, Pandey A. Physical Activity and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: Vital Signs for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment. Current Cardiology Reports. 2021; 23: 172.
[12]
Blair SN, Cheng Y, Scott Holder J. Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining health benefits? Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2001; 33: S379–S399.
[13]
Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee I, et al. Quantity and Quality of Exercise for Developing and Maintaining Cardiorespiratory, Musculoskeletal, and Neuromotor Fitness in Apparently Healthy Adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2011; 43: 1334–1359.
[14]
Shephard RJ, Allen C, Benade AJ, Davies CT, Di Prampero PE, Hedman R, et al. The maximum oxygen intake. An international reference standard of cardiorespiratory fitness. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 1968; 38: 757–764.
[15]
Levine BD. VO2max: what do we know, and what do we still need to know? The Journal of Physiology. 2008; 586: 25–34.
[16]
Mitchell JH, Blomqvist G. Maximal Oxygen Uptake. New England Journal of Medicine. 1971; 284: 1018–1022.
[17]
Sarzynski MA, Rice TK, Després J, Pérusse L, Tremblay A, Stanforth PR, et al. The HERITAGE Family Study: a Review of the Effects of Exercise Training on Cardiometabolic Health, with Insights into Molecular Transducers. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2022; 54: S1–S43.
[18]
Stofan JR, DiPietro L, Davis D, Kohl HW, Blair SN. Physical activity patterns associated with cardiorespiratory fitness and reduced mortality: the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study. American Journal of Public Health. 1998; 88: 1807–1813.
[19]
Arena R, Myers J, Williams MA, Gulati M, Kligfield P, Balady GJ, et al. Assessment of Functional Capacity in Clinical and Research Settings: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Circulation. 2007; 116: 329–343.
[20]
Weber KT, Janicki JS, McElroy PA. Determination of aerobic capacity and the severity of chronic cardiac and circulatory failure. Circulation. 1987; 76: VI40–VI45.
[21]
Weiner DA, Ryan TJ, McCabe CH, Chaitman BR, Sheffield LT, Ferguson JC, et al. Prognostic importance of a clinical profile and exercise test in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1984; 3: 772–779.
[22]
Gettman LR, Pollock ML. What Makes a Superstar? A Physiological Profile. The Physician and Sportsmedicine. 1977; 5: 64–68.
[23]
Mujika I. The Cycling Physiology of Miguel Indurain 14 Years after Retirement. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2012; 7: 397–400.
[24]
Pollock ML. Submaximal and maximal working capacity of elite distance runners. part i: cardiorespiratory aspects. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1977; 301: 310–322.
[25]
Sui X, LaMonte MJ, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness as a predictor of nonfatal cardiovascular events in asymptomatic women and men. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2007; 165: 1413–1423.
[26]
Astrand I, Astrand PO, Hallbäck I, Kilbom A. Reduction in maximal oxygen uptake with age. Journal of Applied Physiology. 1973; 35: 649–654.
[27]
Fleg JL, Morrell CH, Bos AG, Brant LJ, Talbot LA, Wright JG, et al. Accelerated Longitudinal Decline of Aerobic Capacity in Healthy Older Adults. Circulation. 2005; 112: 674–682.
[28]
Jackson AS, Sui X, Hébert JR, Church TS, Blair SN. Role of Lifestyle and Aging on the Longitudinal Change in Cardiorespiratory Fitness. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2009; 169: 1781–1787.
[29]
Li H, Sui X, Huang S, Lavie CJ, Wang Z, Blair SN. Secular Change in Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Body Composition of Women: the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2015; 90: 43–52.
[30]
Willis BL, Morrow JR, Jackson AW, Defina LF, Cooper KH. Secular Change in Cardiorespiratory Fitness of Men: Cooper Center Longitudinal Study. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2011; 43: 2134–2139.
[31]
Ekblom-Bak E, Ekblom O, Andersson G, Wallin P, Söderling J, Hemmingsson E, et al. Decline in cardiorespiratory fitness in the Swedish working force between 1995 and 2017. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 2019; 29: 232–239.
[32]
Craig CL, Shields M, Leblanc AG, Tremblay MS. Trends in aerobic fitness among Canadians, 1981 to 2007–2009. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 2012; 37: 511–519.
[33]
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Assessing physical fitness and physical activity in population-based surveys. Hyattsville, MD: Department of HHS (PHS) No.89-1253. 1989.
[34]
American College of Sports Medicine. Guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. In Seventh (ed.) Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA. 2006.
[35]
Porcari JP, Foster C, Cress ML, Larson R, Lewis H, Cortis C, et al. Prediction of Exercise Capacity and Training Prescription from the 6-Minute Walk Test and Rating of Perceived Exertion. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2021; 6: 52.
[36]
Simonsick EM, Fan E, Fleg JL. Estimating Cardiorespiratory Fitness in well-Functioning Older Adults: Treadmill Validation of the Long Distance Corridor Walk. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2006; 54: 127–132.
[37]
Jurca R, Jackson AS, LaMonte MJ, Morrow JR, Blair SN, Wareham NJ, et al. Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness without Performing Exercise Testing. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005; 29: 185–193.
[38]
Myers J, Kaminsky LA, Lima R, Christle JW, Ashley E, Arena R. A Reference Equation for Normal Standards for VO 2 Max: Analysis from the Fitness Registry and the Importance of Exercise National Database (FRIEND Registry). Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. 2017; 60: 21–29.
[39]
Laukkanen JA, Lakka TA, Rauramaa R, Kuhanen R, Venäläinen JM, Salonen R, et al. Cardiovascular Fitness as a Predictor of Mortality in Men. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2001; 161: 825–831.
[40]
Vanhees L, Fagard R, Thijs L, Staessen J, Amery A. Prognostic significance of peak exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1994; 23: 358–363.
[41]
Blair SN, Kohl HW, 3rd, Paffenbarger RS, Jr., Clark DG, Cooper KH, Gibbons LW. Physical Fitness and all-Cause Mortality. A prospective study of healthy men and women. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1989; 262: 2395–2401.
[42]
Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE. Exercise Capacity and Mortality among Men Referred for Exercise Testing. New England Journal of Medicine. 2002; 346: 793–801.
[43]
Savonen KP, Lakka TA, Laukkanen JA, Rauramaa TH, Salonen JT, Rauramaa R. Workload at the heart rate of 100 beats/min and mortality in middle-aged men with known or suspected coronary heart disease. Heart. 2008; 94: e14.
[44]
Slattery ML, Jacobs DR. Physical fitness and cardiovascular disease mortality. The US railroad study. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1988; 127: 571–580.
[45]
Villeneuve PJ, Morrison HI, Craig CL, Schaubel DE. Physical Activity, Physical Fitness, and Risk of Dying. Epidemiology. 1998; 9: 626–631.
[46]
Kitai T, Shimogai T, Tang WHW, Iwata K, Xanthopoulos A, Otsuka S, et al. Short physical performance battery vs. 6-minute walking test in hospitalized elderly patients with heart failure. European Heart Journal Open. 2021; 1: 1–8.
[47]
Yazdanyar A, Aziz MM, Enright PL, Edmundowicz D, Boudreau R, Sutton-Tyrell K, et al. Association between 6-Minute Walk Test and all-Cause Mortality, Coronary Heart Disease–Specific Mortality, and Incident Coronary Heart Disease. Journal of Aging and Health. 2014; 26: 583–599.
[48]
Nes BM, Vatten LJ, Nauman J, Janszky I, Wisløff U. A Simple Nonexercise Model of Cardiorespiratory Fitness Predicts Long-Term Mortality. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2014; 46: 1159–1165.
[49]
Rankin SL, Briffa TG, Morton AR, Hung J. A specific activity questionnaire to measure the functional capacity of cardiac patients. The American Journal of Cardiology. 1996; 77: 1220–1223.
[50]
Greenland P. Cardiovascular Guideline Skepticism vs Lifestyle Realism? The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2018; 319: 117–118.
[51]
Leong DP, Joseph PG, McKee M, Anand SS, Teo KK, Schwalm J, et al. Reducing the Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease, Part 2: Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation Research. 2017; 121: 695–710.
[52]
Zhu Z, Bundy JD, Mills KT, Bazzano LA, Kelly TN, Zhang Y, et al. Secular Trends in Cardiovascular Health in us Adults (from NHANES 2007 to 2018). The American Journal of Cardiology. 2021; 159: 121–128.
[53]
Carroll MD, Kit BK, Lacher DA, Shero ST, Mussolino ME. Trends in Lipids and Lipoproteins in us Adults, 1988–2010. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2012; 308: 1545–1554.
[54]
Goff DC, Khan SS, Lloyd-Jones D, Arnett DK, Carnethon MR, Labarthe DR, et al. Bending the Curve in Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: Bethesda + 40 and Beyond. Circulation. 2021; 143: 837–851.
[55]
Goel K, Thomas RJ, Squires RW, Coutinho T, Trejo-Gutierrez JF, Somers VK, et al. Combined effect of cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity on mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. American Heart Journal. 2011; 161: 590–597.
[56]
LaMonte MJ, Eisenman PA, Adams TD, Shultz BB, Ainsworth BE, Yanowitz FG. Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors: the LDS Hospital Fitness Institute cohort. Circulation. 2000; 102: 1623–1628.
[57]
Cooper KH, Pollock ML, Martin RP, White SR, Linnerud AC, Jackson A. Physical Fitness Levels vs Selected Coronary Risk Factors. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1976; 236: 166–169.
[58]
Gibbons LW, Blair SN, Cooper KH, Smith M. Association between coronary heart disease risk factors and physical fitness in healthy adult women. Circulation. 1983; 67: 977–983.
[59]
Jurca R, Lamonte MJ, Church TS, Earnest CP, Fitzgerald SJ, Barlow CE, et al. Associations of Muscle Strength and Fitness with Metabolic Syndrome in Men. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2004; 36: 1301–1307.
[60]
LaMonte MJ, Ainsworth BE, Durstine JL. Influence of Cardiorespiratory Fitness on the Association between C-Reactive Protein and Metabolic Syndrome Prevalence in Racially Diverse Women. Journal of Women’s Health. 2005; 14: 233–239.
[61]
Farrell SW, Cheng YJ, Blair SN. Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome across Cardiorespiratory Fitness Levels in Women. Obesity Research. 2004; 12: 824–830.
[62]
Boreham CA, Ferreira I, Twisk JW, Gallagher AM, Savage MJ, Murray LJ. Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Physical Activity, and Arterial Stiffness: the Northern Ireland Young Hearts Project. Hypertension. 2004; 44: 721–726.
[63]
Ho JS, Cannaday JJ, FitzGerald SJ, Leonard D, Finley CE, Wade WA, et al. Relation of Coronary Artery Diameters with Cardiorespiratory Fitness. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2018; 121: 1065–1071.
[64]
Haskell WL, Sims C, Myll J, Bortz WM, St Goar FG, Alderman EL. Coronary artery size and dilating capacity in ultradistance runners. Circulation. 1993; 87: 1076–1082.
[65]
Chen LY, Zmora R, Duval S, Chow LS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Schreiner PJ. Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Adiposity, and Heart Rate Variability: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2019; 51: 509–514.
[66]
Kiviniemi AM, Perkiömäki N, Auvinen J, Niemelä M, Tammelin T, Puukka K, et al. Fitness, Fatness, Physical Activity, and Autonomic Function in Midlife. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2017; 49: 2459–2468.
[67]
Oh M, Gabriel KP, Jacobs Jr. DR, Bao W, Pierce GL, Carr LJ, et al. Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Adults Aged 18 to 34 Years and Long-Term Pericardial Adipose Tissue (from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study). The American Journal of Cardiology. 2022; 172: 130–136.
[68]
Andersson C, Lyass A, Larson MG, Spartano NL, Vita JA, Benjamin EJ, et al. Physical Activity Measured by Accelerometry and its Associations with Cardiac Structure and Vascular Function in Young and Middle‐Aged Adults. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2015; 4: e001528.
[69]
Grewal J, McCully RB, Kane GC, Lam C, Pellikka PA. Left Ventricular Function and Exercise Capacity. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2009; 301: 286.
[70]
Kokkinos P, Pittaras A, Narayan P, Faselis C, Singh S, Manolis A. Exercise Capacity and Blood Pressure Associations with Left Ventricular Mass in Prehypertensive Individuals. Hypertension. 2007; 49: 55–61.
[71]
Pandey A, Allen NB, Ayers C, Reis JP, Moreira HT, Sidney S, et al. Fitness in Young Adulthood and Long-Term Cardiac Structure and Function: The CARDIA Study. JACC: Heart Failure. 2017; 5: 347–355.
[72]
Pandey A, Park B, Martens S, Ayers C, Neeland IJ, Haykowsky MJ, et al. Relationship of Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Adiposity With Left Ventricular Strain in Middle-Age Adults (from the Dallas Heart Study). The American Journal of Cardiology. 2017; 120: 1405–1409.
[73]
Church TS, Barlow CE, Earnest CP, Kampert JB, Priest EL, Blair SN. Associations between Cardiorespiratory Fitness and C-Reactive Protein in Men. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology. 2002; 22: 1869–1876.
[74]
LaMonte MJ, Durstine JL, Yanowitz FG, Lim T, DuBose KD, Davis P, et al. Cardiorespiratory Fitness and C-Reactive Protein among a Tri-Ethnic Sample of Women. Circulation. 2002; 106: 403–406.
[75]
DeFina LF, Willis BL, Radford NB, Christenson RH, deFilippi CR, de Lemos JA. Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Highly Sensitive Cardiac Troponin Levels in a Preventive Medicine Cohort. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2016; 5: e003781.
[76]
Cwikiel J, Seljeflot I, Fagerland MW, Wachtell K, Arnesen H, Berge E, et al. High-sensitive cardiac Troponin T and exercise stress test for evaluation of angiographically significant coronary disease. International Journal of Cardiology. 2019; 287: 1–6.
[77]
Rahimi K, Secknus M, Adam M, Hayerizadeh B, Fiedler M, Thiery J, et al. Correlation of exercise capacity with high-sensitive C-reactive protein in patients with stable coronary artery disease. American Heart Journal. 2005; 150: 1282–1289.
[78]
van Wezenbeek J, Canada JM, Ravindra K, Carbone S, Trankle CR, Kadariya D, et al. C-Reactive Protein and N-Terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide Levels Correlate With Impaired Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Heart Failure Across a Wide Range of Ejection Fraction. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2018; 5: 178.
[79]
Lee S, Kuk JL, Katzmarzyk PT, Blair SN, Church TS, Ross R. Cardiorespiratory Fitness Attenuates Metabolic Risk Independent of Abdominal Subcutaneous and Visceral Fat in Men. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28: 895–901.
[80]
Turzyniecka M, Wild SH, Krentz AJ, Chipperfield AJ, Clough GF, Byrne CD. Diastolic function is strongly and independently associated with cardiorespiratory fitness in central obesity. Journal of Applied Physiology. 2010; 108: 1568–1574.
[81]
Lin X, Zhang X, Guo J, Roberts CK, McKenzie S, Wu W, et al. Effects of Exercise Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Biomarkers of Cardiometabolic Health: a Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2015; 4: e002014.
[82]
Carnethon MR, Gidding SS, Nehgme R, Sidney S, Jacobs DR, Jr., Liu K. Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Young Adulthood and the Development of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003; 290: 3092–3100.
[83]
LaMonte MJ, Barlow CE, Jurca R, Kampert JB, Church TS, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory Fitness is Inversely Associated with the Incidence of Metabolic Syndrome. Circulation. 2005; 112: 505–512.
[84]
Ervin RB. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among adults 20 years of age and over, by sex, age, race and ethnicity, and body mass index: United States 2003–2006. National Health Statistics Reports; no 13 Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2009.
[85]
Church TS, Earnest CP, Skinner JS, Blair SN. Effects of Different Doses of Physical Activity on Cardiorespiratory Fitness among Sedentary, Overweight or Obese Postmenopausal Women with Elevated Blood Pressure: a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2007; 297: 2081–2091.
[86]
Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, Garcia ME, Kohl HW, 3rd, Blair SN. Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness: a randomized trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999; 281: 327–334.
[87]
Katzmarzyk PT, Leon AS, Wilmore JH, Skinner JS, Rao DC, Rankinen T, et al. Targeting the Metabolic Syndrome with Exercise: Evidence from the HERITAGE Family Study. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2003; 35: 1703–1709.
[88]
Bild DE , Bluemke DA, Burke GL, Detrano R, Diez Roux AV, Folsom AR, et al. Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: Objectives and Design. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2002; 156: 871–881.
[89]
Mora S, Redberg RF, Cui Y, Whiteman MK, Flaws JA, Sharrett AR, et al. Ability of Exercise Testing to Predict Cardiovascular and all-Cause Death in Asymptomatic Women: a 20-year follow-up of the lipid research clinics prevalence study. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003; 290: 1600–1607.
[90]
Jae SY, Lee KH, Kim HJ, Kunutsor SK, Heffernan KS, Climie RE, et al. Separate and Joint Associations of Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Healthy Vascular Aging with Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Men. Hypertension. 2022; 79: 1445–1454.
[91]
Scholl J, Bots ML, Peters SAE. Contribution of cardiorespiratory fitness, relative to traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors, to common carotid intima-media thickness. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2015; 277: 439–446.
[92]
Lakka TA, Laukkanen JA, Rauramaa R, Salonen R, Lakka H, Kaplan GA, et al. Cardiorespiratory Fitness and the Progression of Carotid Atherosclerosis in Middle-Aged Men. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2001; 134: 12–20.
[93]
Lee J, Chen B, Kohl HW, Barlow CE, Lee CD, Radford NB, et al. The association of midlife cardiorespiratory fitness with later life carotid atherosclerosis: Cooper Center Longitudinal Study. Atherosclerosis. 2019; 282: 137–142.
[94]
Lee C, Jacobs DR, Hankinson A, Iribarren C, Sidney S. Cardiorespiratory fitness and coronary artery calcification in young adults: the CARDIA Study. Atherosclerosis. 2009; 203: 263–268.
[95]
Hamer M, Kivimaki M, Lahiri A, Yerramasu A, Deanfield JE, Marmot MG, et al. Walking speed and subclinical atherosclerosis in healthy older adults: the Whitehall II study. Heart. 2010; 96: 380–384.
[96]
Inzitari M, Naydeck BL, Newman AB. Coronary Artery Calcium and Physical Function in Older Adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2008; 63: 1112–1118.
[97]
Rauramaa R, Halonen P, Väisänen SB, Lakka TA, Schmidt-Trucksäss A, Berg A, et al. Effects of Aerobic Physical Exercise on Inflammation and Atherosclerosis in Men: the DNASCO Study. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2004; 140: 1007–1014.
[98]
Wildman RP, Schott LL, Brockwell S, Kuller LH, Sutton-Tyrrell K. A dietary and exercise intervention slows menopause-associated progression of subclinical atherosclerosis as measured by intima-media thickness of the carotid arteries. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2004; 44: 579–585.
[99]
Corra U, Piepoli MF, Carre F, Heuschmann P, Hoffmann U, Verschuren M, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: physical activity counselling and exercise training: Key components of the position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. European Heart Journal. 2010; 31: 1967–1974.
[100]
Fleg JL, Cooper LS, Borlaug BA, Haykowsky MJ, Kraus WE, Levine BD, et al. Exercise Training as Therapy for Heart Failure. Circulation: Heart Failure. 2015; 8: 209–220.
[101]
Thomas RJ, Beatty AL, Beckie TM, Brewer LC, Brown TM, Forman DE, et al. Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation: a Scientific Statement from the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation, the American Heart Association, and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation. 2019; 140: e69–e89.
[102]
Laukkanen JA, Mäkikallio TH, Rauramaa R, Kiviniemi V, Ronkainen K, Kurl S. Cardiorespiratory Fitness is Related to the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death: a population-based follow-up study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2010; 56: 1476–1483.
[103]
Letnes JM, Dalen H, Vesterbekkmo EK, Wisloff U, Nes BM. Peak oxygen uptake and incident coronary heart disease in a healthy population: the HUNT Fitness Study. European Heart Journal. 2019; 40: 1633–1639.
[104]
Laukkanen JA, Kurl S, Khan H, Zaccardi F, Kunutsor SK. Percentage of Age-Predicted Cardiorespiratory Fitness is Inversely Associated with Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: a Prospective Cohort Study. Cardiology. 2021; 146: 616–623.
[105]
Åberg ND, Kuhn HG, Nyberg J, Waern M, Friberg P, Svensson J, et al. Influence of Cardiovascular Fitness and Muscle Strength in Early Adulthood on Long-Term Risk of Stroke in Swedish Men. Stroke. 2015; 46: 1769–1776.
[106]
Hooker SP, Sui X, Colabianchi N, Vena J, Laditka J, LaMonte MJ, et al. Cardiorespiratory Fitness as a Predictor of Fatal and Nonfatal Stroke in Asymptomatic Women and Men. Stroke. 2008; 39: 2950–2957.
[107]
Khan H, Jaffar N, Rauramaa R, Kurl S, Savonen K, Laukkanen JA. Cardiorespiratory fitness and nonfatalcardiovascular events: a population-based follow-up study. American Heart Journal. 2017; 184: 55–61.
[108]
Farrell SW, Finley CE, Grundy SM. Cardiorespiratory Fitness, LDL Cholesterol, and CHD Mortality in Men. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2012; 44: 2132–2137.
[109]
Church TS, LaMonte MJ, Barlow CE, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Body Mass Index as Predictors of Cardiovascular Disease Mortality among Men with Diabetes. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2005; 165: 2114–2120.
[110]
LaMonte MJ, FitzGerald SJ, Levine BD, Church TS, Kampert JB, Nichaman MZ, et al. Coronary artery calcium, exercise tolerance, and CHD events in asymptomatic men. Atherosclerosis. 2006; 189: 157–162.
[111]
Shin S, Park J, Park SK, Barrett-Connor E. Utility of graded exercise tolerance tests for prediction of cardiovascular mortality in old age: the Rancho Bernardo Study. International Journal of Cardiology. 2015; 181: 323–327.
[112]
Sui X, Laditka JN, Hardin JW, Blair SN. Estimated Functional Capacity Predicts Mortality in Older Adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2007; 55: 1940–1947.
[113]
Myers J, Tan SY, Abella J, Aleti V, Froelicher VF. Comparison of the chronotropic response to exercise and heart rate recovery in predicting cardiovascular mortality. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. 2007; 14: 215–221.
[114]
Maor E, Kopel E, Sidi Y, Goldenberg I, Segev S, Kivity S. Effect of Mildly Attenuated Heart Rate Response during Treadmill Exercise Testing on Cardiovascular Outcome in Healthy Men and Women. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2013; 112: 1373–1378.
[115]
Giang KW, Hansson P, Mandalenakis Z, Persson CU, Grimby G, Svärdsudd K, et al. Long-term risk of stroke and myocardial infarction in middle-aged men with a hypertensive response to exercise: a 44-year follow-up study. Journal of Hypertension. 2021; 39: 503–510.
[116]
Laukkanen JA, Kurl S, Salonen R, Lakka TA, Rauramaa R, Salonen JT. Systolic Blood Pressure during Recovery from Exercise and the Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Middle-Aged Men. Hypertension. 2004; 44: 820–825.
[117]
Kavanagh T, Mertens DJ, Hamm LF, Beyene J, Kennedy J, Corey P, et al. Prediction of Long-Term Prognosis in 12 169 Men Referred for Cardiac Rehabilitation. Circulation. 2002; 106: 666–671.
[118]
Kavanagh T, Mertens DJ, Hamm LF, Beyene J, Kennedy J, Corey P, et al. Peak oxygen intake and cardiac mortality in women referred for cardiac rehabilitation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2003; 42: 2139–2143.
[119]
Dutcher JR, Kahn J, Grines C, Franklin B. Comparison of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Exercise Capacity as Predictors of Two- and Five-Year Mortality Following Acute Myocardial Infarction. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2007; 99: 436–441.
[120]
O’Neill JO, Young JB, Pothier CE, Lauer MS. Peak oxygen consumption as a predictor of death in patients with heart failure receiving beta-blockers. Circulation. 2005; 111: 2313–2318.
[121]
Arena R, Myers J, Abella J, Pinkstaff S, Brubaker P, Kitzman DW, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing is equally prognostic in young, middle-aged and older individuals diagnosed with heart failure. International Journal of Cardiology. 2011; 151: 278–283.
[122]
Kitzman DW, Whellan DJ, Duncan P, Pastva AM, Mentz RJ, Reeves GR, et al. Physical Rehabilitation for Older Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021; 385: 203–216.
[123]
O’Connor CM, Whellan DJ, Lee KL, Keteyian SJ, Cooper LS, Ellis SJ, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Exercise Training in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2009; 301: 1439–1450.
[124]
Lee D, Sui X, Church TS, Lavie CJ, Jackson AS, Blair SN. Changes in fitness and fatness on the development of cardiovascular disease risk factors hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and hypercholesterolemia. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012; 59: 665–672.
[125]
Prestgaard E, Mariampillai J, Engeseth K, Erikssen J, Bodegård J, Liestøl K, et al. Change in Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Risk of Stroke and Death. Stroke. 2018. (in press)
[126]
Blair SN, Kohl HW, 3rd, Barlow CE, Paffenbarger RS, Jr., Gibbons LW, Macera CA. Changes in physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy and unhealthy men. The Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995; 273: 1093–1098.
[127]
Williams PT. Physical fitness and activity as separate heart disease risk factors: a meta-analysis. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2001; 33: 754–761.
[128]
Talbot LA, Metter EJ, Fleg JL. Leisure-time physical activities and their relationship to cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy men and women 18–95 years old. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2000; 32: 417–425.
[129]
Wagner J, Knaier R, Infanger D, Königstein K, Klenk C, Carrard J, et al. Novel CPET Reference Values in Healthy Adults: Associations with Physical Activity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2021; 53: 26–37.
[130]
Celis-Morales CA, Lyall DM, Anderson J, Iliodromiti S, Fan Y, Ntuk UE, et al. The association between physical activity and risk of mortality is modulated by grip strength and cardiorespiratory fitness: evidence from 498 135 UK-Biobank participants. European Heart Journal. 2017; 38: 116–122.
[131]
Lakka TA, Venalainen JM, Rauramaa R, Salonen R, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT. Relation of leisure-time physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness to the risk of acute myocardial infarction. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1994; 330: 1549–1554.
[132]
Lee D-, Sui X, Ortega FB, Kim Y-, Church TS, Winett RA, et al. Comparisons of leisure-time physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness as predictors of all-cause mortality in men and women. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2011; 45: 504–510.
[133]
LaMonte MJ, Jurca R, Kampert JB, Barlow CE, Nichaman MZ, Blair SN. Exercise tolerance adds prognostic value to the Framingham risk score in asymptomatic women and men. Circulation. 2005; 112: II-829.
[134]
Laukkanen JA, Rauramaa R, Salonen JT, Kurl S. The predictive value of cardiorespiratory fitness combined with coronary risk evaluation and the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause death. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2007; 262: 263–272.
[135]
Mora S, Redberg RF, Sharrett AR, Blumenthal RS. Enhanced risk assessment in asymptomatic individuals with exercise testing and Framingham risk scores. Circulation. 2005; 112: 1566–1572.
[136]
Myers J, Nead KT, Chang P, Abella J, Kokkinos P, Leeper NJ. Improved reclassification of mortality risk by assessment of physical activity in patients referred for exercise testing. The American Journal of Medicine. 2015; 128: 396–402.
[137]
Lauer M, Froelicher ES, Williams M, Kligfield P, American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology SoECR, Prevention. Exercise testing in asymptomatic adults: a statement for professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention. Circulation. 2005; 112: 771–776.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Share
Back to top