IMR Press / JMCM / Volume 5 / Issue 1 / DOI: 10.31083/j.jmcm0501001
Open Access Commentary
Folate supplementations for methotrexate therapies in cancer and arthritis: rationales revisited
Show Less
1 Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VUmc, Amsterdam, NH 1081HV, The Netherlands
*Correspondence: g.jansen@amsterdamumc.nl (Gerrit Jansen)
J. Mol. Clin. Med. 2022 , 5(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.jmcm0501001
Submitted: 3 September 2021 | Accepted: 6 September 2021 | Published: 20 May 2022
Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.

For many decades, the folate antagonist methotrexate (MTX) has served as anchor drug in the treatment of selected cancer types, e.g., (pediatric) leukemia, and chronic inflammatory and joint destructive diseases like rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MTX treatment of leukemia commonly includes high dose MTX therapy (1–10 g/m2) [1], whereas RA treatment is based on low-dose MTX therapy (7.5–30 mg/wk) [2]. In both treatment modalities, therapy-induced toxicities, e.g., mucositis with high dose MTX and liver toxicities with long-term low dose MTX, are antagonized by post-supplementation of folates; leucovorin (LV) after HD-MTX and folic acid with low-dose MTX. Despite longstanding experience with various MTX/folate supplementation schedules in clinical practice, it is still an unresolved issue what is the most optimal schedule of MTX and folate supplementation is in terms of dosing and timing of folate supplementation. Furthermore, given the large variation in folic acid supplementation dosages prescribed with MTX treatment of RA patients worldwide, awareness for folate over-supplementation and concomitant long term adverse effects is called for. This commentary will address this issue in light of recent insights from laboratory, nutritional and clinical studies.

The rationale for HD-MTX and leucovorin rescue treatment is based on tumor cell uptake of MTX via the reduced folate carrier and subsequent intracellular conversion to MTX-polyglutamates (MTX-PGs) by the enzyme folylpolyglutamate synthetase (FPGS) [3]. These MTX-PGs are potent inhibitors of key enzymes in folate metabolism, including dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), thymidylate synthase (TS), 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (AICARFT) and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (GARTF), thereby impairing de novo biosynthesis of purines and thymidylate (for DNA synthesis), amino acids and methylation reactions. Sustained MTX inhibition of DHFR (>99% for 24 h) is considered necessary to initiate antitumor effects. It is assumed that normal cells harbor lower FPGS activities than tumor cells and thus accumulate lower MTX-PG levels will thus impose a less sustained DHFR block. Consequently, upon administration of the reduced folate cofactor leucovorin the blockade of DHFR will be reversed more easily in normal cells than in tumor cells thereby reducing toxic effects. From this perspective, it is evident that optimal dosing of MTX and timing of leucovorin administration after MTX dosing is crucial to obtain highest efficacy and minimize toxicity. In most standard protocols, LV administration is commonly initiated at the time (between 24–48 h) when plasma levels of MTX had dropped below 1–2 μM. However, to allow more personalized approach during the course of treatment, it would be of added value to monitor additional MTX cellular pharmacology parameters (cellular transport capacity, MTX-PG accumulation and FPGS activity) as well as intracellular folate status. Notably, MTX-PG analyses in leukemic blast cells revealed a large inter-patient variability of MTX-PG accumulation during HD-MTX therapy [1]. In addition, a recent study analyzed MTX-PG and folate levels in erythrocytes (RBC) during the course of HD-MTX/LV treatment of leukemia patients, again demonstrating a large interpatient variability with the standard dose of MTX [4]. Whether leukemic blast cells also harbor large inter-patient variability in folate levels needs further exploration and thus advocate the inclusion of a therapeutic drug monitoring arm in future HD-MTX/LV treatments to identify whether patients are either under- or over-dosed with MTX and/or LV accounting for differential therapy efficacies.

Dedicated studies related to MTX toxicity in mucosal tissues may also benefit from the recent availability of mucosal organoid models [5], which may help to optimize timing and dosing of LV after MTX administration to minimize toxicity.

In RA treatment, LV (at a dose of 2.5–5 mg/once a week) also proved to be effective in controlling MTX toxicity without compromising MTX efficacy at MTX dosages <15 mg and >15 mg, respectively [6]. In the same study, 1–2 mg of folic acid (daily after MTX) demonstrated almost equal results as for LV. For cost-effective reasons, folic acid is nowadays the preferred choice to manage MTX toxicity. Although initially 1 mg daily dosages of FA were commonly used to manage MTX toxicity in RA treatment, during the past 2 decades variable and increasingly higher dosages of FA (up to 30 mg weekly [7]) have employed in clinical practice. In some cases, these changes were indicated because of social health care reimbursements reason, whereby (e.g., in the Netherlands) 1 mg FA tablets for daily use were not reimbursed but 5 mg FA for once weekly use were. Remarkably, this change in policy was not backed up with a proper clinical trial comparing the 2 dosages for MTX efficacy, MTX toxicity and possible long term (adverse) effects.

A systematic review by Liu et al. [8] reported that folic acid supplementation dosages of <10 mg/week and dosages of >25 mg/week were equally effective in reducing MTX toxicity and sustaining MTX efficacy in RA patients. Notwithstanding this fact, the wide variation of folic acid supplementation dosages and scheduling calls for reflection as one hallmark folate nutritional study has provide compelling evidence that humans can only metabolize 1 mg of folic acid/day because of the very low DHFR activity in the liver [9]. Thus, administering dosages of >1 mg folic acid/day will result in an increase of unmetabolized folic acid (UMFA) in the circulation. This was clearly shown in elderly persons who were administered 5 mg folic acid daily for 3 weeks after which UMFA reached plasma levels of 15–209 nmol/L [10]. Similarly, in a clinical RA setting, patients on low dose MTX therapy with either weekly 10 or 30 mg folic acid supplementation, serum UMFA levels were also markedly increased (up to 300 nmol/L) after 24 weeks of therapy [7]. It is well recognized that long-term circulating UMFA may impose a diversity of (adverse) effects, e.g., impairing uptake of circulating 5-methyltetrahydrofolate in vascular endothelial cells, impairing NK cell function, impairing neurodevelopment, increasing the risk of gestational hypertension, providing a growth advantage for premalignant cells, and epigenetic effects [11, 12, 13]. A recent prospective cohort study of >10,000 subjects also revealed an age-dependent relationship between UMFA serum levels and an increased risk of mortality [14].

Altogether, these observations call for awareness of potential adverse effects associated with prolonged folic acid over-supplementation at daily dosages exceeding 1 mg/day in MTX treatment protocols for RA, even though MTX efficacy and toxicity may not be compromised. This notion also relates to complementary folic acid intake via folate food fortification programs and or multi-vitamin preparations. Like for cancer patients, there is accumulating evidence of a large interpatient variability of blood cell accumulation of MTX-PGs of RA patients who all received a standard dose of 15–25 mg MTX [15]. This would argue not only for personalizing MTX therapy, but also folic acid supplementation. To this end, emerging therapeutic drug monitoring of folates/UMFA levels in plasma and MTX-PG and folate levels in blood cells of RA patients during the course of treatment could further guide optimal MTX therapies, reduction of MTX toxicities and avoidance of adverse effects initiated by folic acid over-supplementation. Notwithstanding decades of successful clinical use of MTX in cancer and RA treatment, deciphering the complexity of regulation of folate metabolism and MTX cellular pharmacology in cancer cells and immune cells may further assist in fine-tuning current MTX treatment protocols and designing novel MTX/antifolate-based protocols. Targeting mitochondrial folate metabolism [16] deserves future exploration as therapeutic option.

Author contributions

The author confirms sole responsibility for the following: study conception and design, data collection, and manuscript preparation.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest. Gerrit Jansen is serving as one of the Editorial Board members of this journal. We declare that Gerrit Jansen had no involvement in the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to Paola Perego.

References
[1]
Masson E, Relling MV, Synold TW, Liu Q, Schuetz JD, Sandlund JT, et al. Accumulation of methotrexate polyglutamates in lymphoblasts is a determinant of antileukemic effects in vivo. A rationale for high-dose methotrexate. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1996; 97: 73–80.
[2]
Brown PM, Pratt AG, Isaacs JD. Mechanism of action of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis, and the search for biomarkers. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2016; 12: 731–742.
[3]
Gonen N, Assaraf YG. Antifolates in cancer therapy: structure, activity and mechanisms of drug resistance. Drug Resistance Updates. 2012; 15: 183–210.
[4]
Oosterom N, Fiocco M, Kloos RQH, van der Sluis IM, Pieters R, van Zelst BD, et al. The evaluation of red blood cell folate and methotrexate levels during protocol M in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. BMC Cancer. 2020; 20: 940.
[5]
Driehuis E, Oosterom N, Heil SG, Muller IB, Lin M, Kolders S, et al. Patient-derived oral mucosa organoids as an in vitro model for methotrexate induced toxicity in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15: e0231588.
[6]
Van Ede AE, Laan RFJM, Rood MJ, Huizinga TWJ, Van De Laar MAFJ, Denderen CJV, et al. Effect of folic or folinic acid supplementation on the toxicity and efficacy of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a forty-eight-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2001; 44: 1515–1524.
[7]
Dhir V, Sandhu A, Kaur J, Pinto B, Kumar P, Kaur P, et al. Comparison of two different folic acid doses with methotrexate–a randomized controlled trial (FOLVARI Study). Arthritis Research & Therapy. 2015; 17: 156.
[8]
Liu L, Liu S, Wang C, Guan W, Zhang Y, Hu W, et al. Folate Supplementation for Methotrexate Therapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Rheumatology. 2019; 25: 197–202.
[9]
Bailey SW, Ayling JE. The extremely slow and variable activity of dihydrofolate reductase in human liver and its implications for high folic acid intake. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009; 106: 15424–15429.
[10]
Obeid R, Kirsch SH, Kasoha M, Eckert R, Herrmann W. Concentrations of unmetabolized folic acid and primary folate forms in plasma after folic acid treatment in older adults. Metabolism. 2011; 60: 673–680.
[11]
Smith AD, Kim Y, Refsum H. Is folic acid good for everyone? The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2008; 87: 517–533.
[12]
Murray LK, Smith MJ, Jadavji NM. Maternal oversupplementation with folic acid and its impact on neurodevelopment of offspring. Nutrition Reviews. 2018; 76: 708–721.
[13]
Li Q, Xu S, Chen X, Zhang X, Li X, Lin L, et al. Folic Acid Supplement Use and Increased Risk of Gestational Hypertension. Hypertension. 2020; 76: 150–156.
[14]
Liu M, Zhang Z, Zhou C, Li Q, He P, Zhang Y, et al. Relationship of several serum folate forms with the risk of mortality: a prospective cohort study. Clinical Nutrition. 2021; 40: 4255–4262.
[15]
de Rotte MCFJ, den Boer E, de Jong PHP, Pluijm SMF, Ćalasan MB, Weel AE, et al. Methotrexate polyglutamates in erythrocytes are associated with lower disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2015; 74: 408–414.
[16]
Dekhne AS, Hou Z, Gangjee A, Matherly LH. Therapeutic Targeting of Mitochondrial one-Carbon Metabolism in Cancer. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 2020; 19: 2245–2255.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Share
Back to top