Academic Editor

Article Metrics

  • Fig. 1.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 2.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 3.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 4.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 5.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 6.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Information

  • Download

  • Contents

Abstract

Background:

Molecular targeted therapies play a crucial role in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Lenvatinib is a standard targeted agent for advanced HCC, while quercetin has emerged as a promising natural compound with anti-HCC potential. This study investigates the combined effect of quercetin and lenvatinib on HCC.

Methods:

The human HCC cell line Huh7 and a nude mouse subcutaneous xenograft model were utilized. We evaluated cell proliferation, clonogenicity, invasion, migration, and apoptosis through Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8), clonogenic, Transwell, and flow cytometry assays, respectively. Network pharmacology analysis was performed identify common targets. The protein expression levels of B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), Bcl-2 associated X-protein (Bax), E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and protein tyrosine kinase 2 (PTK2) were assessed by Western blotting. In vivo experiments were conducted to validate the anti-tumor efficacy of the combination treatment.

Results:

The combination of quercetin and lenvatinib significantly enhanced inhibition of Huh7 cell proliferation, colony formation, invasion, and migration (p < 0.01) and promoted apoptosis (p < 0.01) compared to individual treatments. Mechanistically, the combination treatment decreased the expression of Bcl-2 and N-cadherin while upregulating Bax and E-cadherin. PTK2 was identified as a key shared target, and the combination most effectively suppressed its protein expression. In vivo, the combination group demonstrated a higher tumor inhibition rate (p < 0.01) and a Combination Index (CDI) of 0.753.

Conclusion:

Quercetin significantly enhances the anti-tumor efficacy of lenvatinib, likely through synergistic inhibition of PTK2 expression.

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent and lethal malignancies globally. Its high incidence and mortality rates are especially high in regions with endemic hepatitis B virus infection and a high prevalence of cirrhosis, posing a substantial burden to global public health [1, 2, 3].

Lenvatinib, a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, exerts anti-tumor effects by blocking kinases including vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), thereby disrupting tumor angiogenesis and signaling pathways regulating cell proliferation. It is established as a first-line standard treatment for advanced HCC [4, 5, 6]. However, its effectiveness is limited by the development of resistance. The mechanism behind lenvatinib resistance is complex and multifactorial. Tumor cells can bypass the inhibitory effects of drugs by activating alternative signaling pathways, including c-MET and EGFR. As a result, tumor cells undergo epithelial-mesenchymal transition or increase their stemness, thereby enhancing their invasiveness and survival capabilities. Immunosuppressive cells and fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment also contribute to the development of drug resistance in tumor cells [7, 8]. Consequently, research is focusing on developing strategies to enhance lenvatinib sensitivity and effective combination therapies for HCC treatment.

Quercetin, a naturally occurring flavonoid found in various vegetables, fruits, and medicinal herbs, exhibits diverse pharmacological properties such as anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-tumor effects [9, 10, 11]. Recent studies indicate that quercetin inhibits tumor growth through mechanisms including G2/M phase cell cycle arrest, induction of mitochondrial apoptosis, and suppression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasion, and metastasis [12, 13, 14]. Furthermore, it modulates key oncogenic signaling pathways like PI3K/AKT, NF-κB, and MAPK/ERK, demonstrating potential to sensitize cancer cells to conventional chemotherapy and targeted agents [15, 16, 17]. The study of quercetin combined with sorafenib in HCC showed that quercetin combined with sorafenib synergistically downregulates oncogenes such as TNF-α, VEGF, and NF-κB, significantly inhibits tumor growth, and induces cell apoptosis [18, 19]. Quercetin has also been found to increase drug sensitivity by promoting copper-dependent cell death in lenvatinib-resistant HCC cells [20]. However, further research is necessary to identify the specific targets and mechanisms underlying quercetin-mediated lenvatinib sensitization.

Network pharmacology analysis suggests that quercetin, as a multi-target natural product, influences numerous key factors in HCC pathogenesis, including EGFR, PIK3CA, matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), and B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), impacting critical biological processes including cell proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and the tumor microenvironment [21, 22, 23]. A comprehensive exploration of the interactive effects of quercetin and lenvatinib within regulatory networks could illuminate the mechanistic basis for their potential combined antitumor activity.

This study utilized the human HCC cell line Huh7 and a nude mouse xenograft model to investigate the synergistic anti-tumor effects of quercetin combined with lenvatinib. We aimed to elucidate the potential mechanisms involving cell proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, metastasis, and associated molecular pathways, thereby providing novel experimental evidence and strategic options for clinical HCC combination therapy.

2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Cell Culture

The human HCC cell line Huh7 (#CL-0102) was procured from Procell Life Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). The Huh7 cells were validated using STR profiling and tested negative for mycoplasma. Cells were maintained in DMEM high-glucose medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin-streptomycin at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. All experiments were completed within the 10th to 25th passage after cell recovery, during the logarithmic growth phase of cells.

2.2 Reagents and Drugs

Quercetin (HY-18085, 99.80% purity) and lenvatinib (HY-10981, 99.75% purity) were purchased from MedChemExpress (MCE, South Brunswick Township, NJ, USA). The Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, #CK18) was obtained from Dojindo. Transwell® plates (#3422) were sourced from Corning (Corning, New York, NY, USA). The Annexin V-FITC/PI Apoptosis Detection Kit (#C1062S), SDS-PAGE Gel Preparation Kit (P0012A), and BCA Protein Assay Kit (P0399L) were sourced from Beyotime Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China). Details of the antibodies used can be found in Supplementary Table 1.

2.3 CCK-8 Assay

Huh7 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at 5 × 103 cells/well. Cells were treated with DMSO (control, 0.1%), various concentrations of quercetin (5, 10, 50, 100 µM), lenvatinib (5, 10, 25, 50 µM), or their combinations (Que 50 µM + Len 5 µM; Que 10 µM + Len 10 µM; Que 5 µM + Len 25 µM) for 24 hours. Following treatment, 10 µL of CCK-8 reagent was added to each well, and cells were incubated for an additional 90 minutes. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm. The Combination Index (CDI) was calculated using the formula CDI = AB / (A × B), where AB, A, and B represent the relative viability (OD450) of the combination, quercetin alone, and lenvatinib alone groups, respectively, normalized to the control [24].

2.4 Cloning Formation Assay

Huh7 cells (500/well) were plated in 6-well plates and treated with DMSO, 10 µM quercetin, 10 µM lenvatinib, or their combination for 24 hours. Afterward, the medium was then replaced with drug-free medium, and cells were cultured for 14 days. Colonies were fixed, stained with 0.1% crystal violet, and those >50 µm in diameter were counted.

2.5 Flow Cytometry Detection of Cell Apoptosis

Huh7 cells (5 × 104 /well) treated as described above for 24 hours were collected and stained using the Annexin V-FITC/PI Apoptosis Detection Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Apoptosis rates were assessed by flow cytometry.

2.6 Transwell Invasion Experiment

Transwell inserts pre-coated with Matrigel were seeded with treated cells (5 × 103 cells/insert). The lower chamber contained medium with 10% FBS. After 24 hours, non-invading cells were removed, and invaded cells on the membrane underside were fixed, stained with crystal violet, and counted.

2.7 Wound Healing Assay

Confluent Huh7 monolayers in 6-well plates were scratched with a sterile 100 µL pipette tip after 24-hour treatments. After washing, fresh medium was added. Wound closure was photographed at 0 and 24 hours, and the healing rate was quantified using ImageJ software (Version 1.54p, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

2.8 Western Blot Analysis

Total protein was extracted, quantified by BCA assay, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked, incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. Protein bands were visualized using an ECL kit and analyzed with ImageJ software.

2.9 Network Pharmacology Analysis

Potential targets of quercetin and lenvatinib were retrieved from the SwissTargetPrediction database. HCC-related targets were obtained from GeneCards. Common targets among quercetin, lenvatinib, and HCC were identified. A Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network was constructed using the STRING database (https://cn.string-db.org/), and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was performed using the DAVID database (https://davidbioinformatics.nih.gov/).

2.10 Tumor Xenograft Assay

Male BALB/c nude mice (4–6 weeks old) were subcutaneously inoculated with Huh7 cells (5 × 106) in the right axilla. Tumor-bearing mice were randomized into four groups (n = 5/group): Control, Quercetin (25 mg/kg, i.p., 3 times/week) [15], Lenvatinib (5 mg/kg, p.o., 5 times/week) [25], and Combination (Quercetin 20 mg/kg + Lenvatinib 5 mg/kg, same schedules). Mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation after five weeks. Tumors were excised, weighed, and measured. Tumor volume was calculated as (length × width2) / 2. The in vivo CDI was calculated as described for the CCK-8 assay.

2.11 Immunohistochemistry Staining

Tumor tissues from 19 HCC patients, along with their clinical pathological information, were collected for protein tyrosine kinase 2 (PTK2) staining and analysis. Paraffin-embedded tumor sections underwent deparaffinization, antigen retrieval, and blocking of endogenous peroxidase and non-specific sites. Sections were incubated with PTK2 primary antibody overnight at 4 °C, followed by an HRP-labeled secondary antibody. Staining was developed using DAB, counterstained with hematoxylin, and visualized under a microscope.

2.12 Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Comparisons among multiple groups used one-way ANOVA, and between two groups used Student’s t-test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), and graphs were generated with GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results
3.1 Quercetin Potentiates the Anti-Proliferative Effect of Lenvatinib in HCC Cells

CCK-8 assays demonstrated that both quercetin and lenvatinib inhibited Huh7 cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner (p < 0.05, Fig. 1A,B). The combinations of the two agents at various concentrations resulted in significantly greater suppression of cell viability compared to the control (p < 0.01, Fig. 1C). CDI values for all tested combinations were below one, confirming a synergistic interaction (Fig. 1D). The inhibition rate of quercetin alone at 10 µM is (19.3 ± 3.61)%, while the inhibition rate of lenvatinib alone at 10 µM is (19.3 ± 4.17)%. Based on these results, the combination of 10 µM quercetin and 10 µM lenvatinib was selected for subsequent experiments.

Fig. 1.

Quercetin synergizes with lenvatinib to inhibit HCC cell proliferation. (A) Quercetin at different concentrations inhibited the proliferation of Huh7 cells (n = 5). (B) Lenvatinib at different concentrations inhibited the proliferation of Huh7 cells (n = 5). (C) Quercetin and lenvatinib at different concentrations inhibit the proliferation of Huh7 cells (n = 5). (D) Combination Index (CDI) according to the results of C indicated that quercetin and lenvatinib had a combined inhibitory effect on the proliferation of Huh7 cells. Data are mean ± SD. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001 vs. control group. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.

3.2 Quercetin Enhances the Anti-HCC Efficacy of Lenvatinib

Clonogenic assays showed that both quercetin and lenvatinib monotherapies reduced colony formation (F = 138.9, p < 0.05). However, their combination resulted in a more pronounced inhibitory effect (t = 8.86, p < 0.01 vs. lenvatinib alone, Fig. 2A). Flow cytometry analysis indicated that both agents individually induced apoptosis (F = 68.16, p < 0.05), with the combination significantly enhancing these effects (t = 4.92, p < 0.05 vs. lenvatinib alone, Fig. 2B). Western blot analysis revealed that monotherapies only modestly regulated apoptosis-related proteins, but the combination most effectively downregulated the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 (t = 4.89, p < 0.05 vs. lenvatinib alone, Fig. 2C) and upregulated the pro-apoptotic protein Bax (t = 17.15, p < 0.05 vs. lenvatinib alone, Fig. 2C).

Fig. 2.

Effect of quercetin on the pro-apoptotic and anti-clonogenic activity of lenvatinib in Huh7 cells. (A) Representative images and quantification of colonies formed by Huh7 cells following treatment (biological replicates, n = 3). (B) Apoptosis analysis by Annexin V-FITC/PI staining and flow cytometry after 24-hour treatment (biological replicates, n = 3). (C) Western blot analysis and densitometric quantification of Bcl-2 and Bax protein levels in treated Huh7 cells (biological replicates, n = 3), with GAPDH used as a loading control. The combination of quercetin and lenvatinib significantly enhanced apoptosis and inhibited colony formation compared to lenvatinib alone. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from three independent experiments. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 versus control; #, p < 0.05; ##, p < 0.01 versus the lenvatinib-only group.

Transwell invasion assays demonstrated that both drugs inhibited Huh7 cell invasion when used alone, with the combination yielding a superior effect (F = 107.5, t = 6.86. p < 0.01 vs. lenvatinib alone, Fig. 3A). Similarly, wound healing assays confirmed that single agents inhibited cell migration, with the combination significantly suppressing this effect (F = 37.58, t = 4.74, p < 0.05 vs. lenvatinib alone, Fig. 3B). Western blot analysis of EMT markers showed that the combination synergistically downregulated N-cadherin (t = 7.79, p < 0.05 vs. lenvatinib alone, Fig. 3C) and upregulated E-cadherin compared to monotherapies (t = 4.24, p < 0.05 vs. lenvatinib alone, Fig. 3C).

Fig. 3.

Effect of quercetin on the anti-invasive and anti-migratory activity of lenvatinib in Huh7 cells. (A) Representative images and quantification of invaded Huh7 cells through Matrigel using a Transwell assay (scale bar: 200 µm, biological replicates, n = 3). (B) Representative images and quantification of Huh7 cell migration assessed by wound healing assay (scale bar: 200 µm, biological replicates, n = 3). (C) Western blot analysis and densitometric quantification of E-cadherin and N-cadherin protein levels in treated Huh7 cells (biological replicates, n = 3), with GAPDH used as a loading control. The combination of quercetin and lenvatinib significantly inhibited cell invasion and migration compared to lenvatinib alone, accompanied by increased E-cadherin and decreased N-cadherin expression. Cells treated with vehicle control (DMSO) were used as the reference for response normalization. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from three independent experiments. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 versus control; #, p < 0.05; ##, p < 0.01 versus the lenvatinib-only group.

3.3 PTK2 is a Key Shared Target of Quercetin and Lenvatinib in HCC

The molecular structures of quercetin and lenvatinib are shown in Fig. 4A,B. Network pharmacology initially identified 21 common targets from quercetin, lenvatinib, and HCC-related genes (Supplementary Tables 2–4, Supplementary Fig. 1). Refining the analysis using the top 300 HCC-related targets pinpointed PTK2, KDR, ABCC1, MET, ALK, and PIK3CG as key overlapping targets (Fig. 4C,D). KEGG pathway analysis of the intersecting genes is presented in Fig. 4E.

Fig. 4.

Network pharmacology analysis of potential targets for quercetin combined with lenvatinib in the treatment of HCC. (A) Molecular structure of quercetin. (B) Molecular structure of lenvatinib. (C) Venn diagram showing the overlap among targets of quercetin, targets of lenvatinib, and HCC-related targets. (D) Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of overlapping genes. (E) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for the overlapping genes, indicating that the synergistic effects of the drug combination are likely mediated through regulation of multiple signaling pathways relevant to HCC progression. Analysis was based on established public databases and bioinformatics tools. Data visualization and statistical enrichment were performed to identify key network components and pathways.

An examination of TCGA data revealed significantly elevated mRNA expression of PTK2, MET, and ABCC1 in HCC tissues compared to normal liver tissues (p < 0.001, Fig. 5A–C), whereas KDR, ALK, and PIK3CG showed no significant difference (Fig. 5D–F). Survival analysis indicated that high PTK2 expression was associated with significantly poorer overall, disease-free, and progression-free survival in HCC patients (Fig. 5G–I). In contrast, ABCC1 and MET expression lacked significant prognostic correlation (Supplementary Fig. 2). PTK2 was confirmed as a significant prognostic factor (p < 0.05, Fig. 5J). IHC analysis of 19 human HCC samples revealed cytoplasmic PTK2 expression in most cases (14/19, Fig. 5K; patient characteristics in Supplementary Table 5). Western blotting confirmed that both single agents reduced PTK2 protein levels in Huh7 cells, with the combination leading to the most substantial decrease (t = 8.98, p < 0.05, Fig. 5L).

Fig. 5.

Identification of PTK2 as a key prognostic and therapeutic target in HCC. (A–F) mRNA expression levels of PTK2, MET, ABCC1, KDR, ALK, and PIK3CG in HCC tissues compared to normal tissues, based on data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. (G–I) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of HCC patients stratified by PTK2 expression levels: (G) Overall Survival, (H) Disease-Free Survival, (I) Progression-Free Survival. (J) Forest plot summarizing the prognostic value of PTK2 mRNA expression in HCC across multiple survival endpoints. (K) Representative immunohistochemical images showing PTK2-negative and PTK2-positive staining in human HCC tissue sections (scale bar: 200 µm for 100 ×, scale bar: 50 µm for 400 ×). (L) Western blot analysis and densitometric quantification of PTK2 protein expression in treated Huh7 cells (biological replicates, n = 3), with GAPDH used as a loading control. The combination of quercetin and lenvatinib significantly reduced PTK2 expression compared to lenvatinib alone. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from three independent experiments. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 versus control; ##, p < 0.01 versus the lenvatinib-only group.

3.4 Quercetin Enhances Lenvatinib’s Anti-Tumor Effect In Vivo

In the Huh7 xenograft model, both monotherapies (Fig. 6A) reduced tumor volume (F = 94.35, t = 6.45, p < 0.05, Fig. 6B) and weight (F = 96.78, t = 4.67, p < 0.05, Fig. 6C); however, the combination therapy was significantly more effective. There were no significant changes in HE of the liver and kidneys in each group, indicating that the effects of monotherapy or combination therapy on liver and kidney function were tolerable (see Supplementary Fig. 3). The calculated in vivo CDI of 0.753 confirmed synergistic activity (Fig. 6D). Western blot analysis of tumor tissues corroborated the in vitro findings, showing the strongest downregulation of PTK2 protein in the combination group (t = 10.39, p < 0.01, Fig. 6E).

Fig. 6.

Quercetin synergizes with lenvatinib to inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma growth in vivo. (A) Representative photographs of excised xenograft tumors from each treatment group (n = 5 mice per group). (B) Tumor growth curves showing volume changes over the treatment period. (C) Final tumor weights measured at the study endpoint. (D) The in vivo Combination Index (CI) calculated based on final tumor volumes. The CI value indicated a synergistic therapeutic effect between quercetin and lenvatinib. (E) Western blot analysis and densitometric quantification of PTK2 protein expression in xenograft tumor tissues (n = 3), with GAPDH used as a loading control. The combination treatment significantly reduced PTK2 expression compared to lenvatinib monotherapy. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from three independent experiments or replicates. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001 versus the vehicle control group; ##, p < 0.01 versus the lenvatinib-only group.

4. Discussion

This research systematically elucidates the potential of quercetin, a dietary flavonoid, to significantly enhance the anti-tumor activity of lenvatinib in HCC. Our experimental models demonstrate that the combination therapy exhibits a synergistic suppression of key oncogenic traits — proliferation, clonogenicity, invasion, and migration — while simultaneously activating apoptotic pathways. Consistent calculation of Combination Index (CDI) values below one in both cellular and animal studies provided quantitative validation of this pharmacological synergy. Moving beyond phenotypic observation, our integrated strategy, which combines computational network pharmacology with molecular validation, pinpointed PTK2 (Focal Adhesion Kinase) as a critical shared target. This mechanistic insight not only offers a potential clinical strategy to address lenvatinib resistance but also delineates a specific molecular pathway underlying the combined effect.

As a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, Lenvatinib exerts anti-tumor effects by disrupting angiogenic signaling through VEGFR, FGFR, and PDGFR, as well as directly suppressing tumor cell proliferation via RET and KIT inhibition [4, 5, 6, 26]. However, its efficacy in advanced HCC is frequently limited by the development of resistance, mainly due to the pronounced heterogeneity of HCC and its complex stromal microenvironment [27]. While our data confirm the standalone anti-HCC properties of quercetin, its main value appears to lie in its role as a potent sensitizer. The compound significantly lowers the threshold for lenvatinib’s efficacy, transforming a modest cytostatic response into a powerful cytotoxic and anti-metastatic outcome.

The synergy we observed extends beyond a mere additive impact on cell numbers. It represents a coordinated attack on multiple core cancer capabilities. The combination regimen not only more effectively suppressed immediate proliferation but also critically undermined the tumor’s long-term replicative potential, as demonstrated by the drastic reduction in colony-forming ability. Equally important, invasive and migratory behaviors — key drivers of metastasis — were significantly impaired, alongside a marked shift in the cellular population towards apoptosis. The consistent CDI values obtained from independent in vitro and in vivo systems provide robust, multi-level confirmation of a precise synergistic interaction. This pharmacodynamic profile suggests a compelling clinical possibility that quercetin co-therapy could enhance lenvatinib’s therapeutic window, potentially maintaining tumor control at lower, less toxic drug doses [28]. Managing lenvatinib therapy is often complicated by common adverse effects, such as hypertension, proteinuria, and hand-foot syndrome, which can necessitate dose modifications and disrupt treatment continuity, thereby jeopardizing long-term outcomes [29, 30]. In this context, quercetin stands out as a uniquely suitable combination partner. Its status as a ubiquitous dietary component, along with a long history of safe use in humans, positions it as an ideal candidate for mitigating regimen-related toxicity. By synergistically enhancing anti-tumor potency, this combination could theoretically enable effective disease management with reduced lenvatinib exposure, ultimately improving patient tolerability and quality of life, a critical goal in palliative oncology.

The major finding of our work is the identification of PTK2 as a central mediator of this synergy. PTK2 acts as a non-receptor tyrosine kinase and serves as an important signaling hub that integrates inputs affecting cell survival, proliferation, and motility [31]. Its pathogenic role in HCC is well-documented, with numerous reports linking its overexpression to advanced disease stages, vascular invasion, and poor patient survival [32, 33]. Mechanistically, PTK2 sustains tumor cell viability by activating pro-survival cascades like PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Ras/MAPK [34, 35]. Concurrently, it functions as a master regulator of the invasive program, driving metastasis and shaping a permissive tumor microenvironment through effects on angiogenesis and immune evasion [36, 37]. Our results indicate that while both monotherapies can modestly attenuate PTK2 levels, their combination induces a far more substantial downregulation. This cooperative suppression likely disrupts a network of downstream oncogenic signals, ultimately manifesting as the observed potentiation of apoptosis (via Bcl-2/Bax) and reversal of EMT (via E-cadherin/N-cadherin). The congruent modulation of these pivotal pathways strongly supports PTK2’s role as an orchestrator of the synergistic response.

However, this study has some limitations, including the reliance on a single HCC cell line (Huh7) and a subcutaneous xenograft model. In the future study, more HCC cell lines will be applied to study the sensitization effect of quercetin on lenvatinib. Although PTK2 is identified as a key shared target, the precise upstream and downstream molecular pathways through which the combination therapy modulates PTK2 and exerts its synergistic effects require further elucidation. Future work must clarify the precise molecular events by which each agent, and their combination, regulates PTK2. Is control exerted at the transcriptional level, through mRNA stability, or via post-translational modification and protein degradation? From a translational perspective, it is essential to determine if tumors exhibiting high PTK2 expression or activation constitute a biomarker-defined population that derives exceptional benefit from this regimen, paving the way for personalized therapy. Furthermore, evaluating the efficacy of this combination in models with acquired lenvatinib resistance would offer invaluable insights for managing refractory disease.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, this study establishes quercetin as a potent enhancer of lenvatinib’s anti-HCC efficacy. The observed synergy, which influences a range of cancer hallmarks from proliferation and survival to invasion and metastasis, is mechanistically rooted in the cooperative targeting of PTK2. These findings provide a strong scientific foundation for clinical exploration of the quercetin-lenvatinib combination, proposing a dual-pronged strategy to enhance therapeutic efficacy and potentially overcome resistance in HCC.

Availability of Data and Materials

The data sets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Author Contributions

YZ designed the research study. JL and QHY performed the research. KL and XC collected and analyzed the data. JL and YZ have been involved in drafting the manuscript and all authors have been involved in revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors give final approval of the version to be published. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to its accuracy or integrity.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The patient samples and information collected in the study were approved by the ethics committee of Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University ([2024] -032). The study was carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. All pathological samples obtained were informed to patients or their families/legal guardians and signed an informed consent form. The animal experiments in the study were approved by the ethics committee Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University ([2023] -156). The animal experiments in the study was in compliance with the revised Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 in the UK and Directive 2010/63/EU in Europe).

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the following grant: Research Project of Hunan Provincial Health Commission (20254505).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at https://doi.org/10.31083/FBL47715.

References

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.