1 Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Long Island University, Brookville, NY 11548, USA
2 Division of Regenerative Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA
3 Department of Basic Science, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA
Vitamin D is a secosteroid hormone produced physiologically or obtained from
food. The conventional pathway of vitamin D synthesis includes three steps.
First, vitamin D is synthesized in the skin from 7-dehydrocholesterol. Then, the
skin-derived vitamin D is converted to 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) by
25-hydroxylase in the liver. Finally, 25(OH)D is further converted to active
vitamin D, i.e., 1,25(OH)2D, in the kidney by 25-hydroxyvitamin D
1
Despite the early detection of extra-renal 1
Promising preclinical data have led to numerous large clinical trials of vitamin D supplementation for treating autoimmune diseases (e.g., multiple sclerosis, type 1 diabetes, and inflammatory bowel disease). However, these clinical trials did not produce the expected outcomes. Consequently, current strategies to harness the non-classical functions of 1,25(OH)2D in humans are not fully optimized [7, 8].
Several clinical trials testing vitamin D supplementation failed due to safety concerns, which precluded dose escalations. Many newly discovered functions of 1,25(OH)2D require concentrations that are significantly higher than physiological blood levels and lead to hypercalcemia if present systemically [5]. Hypercalcemia refers to a condition where blood calcium levels are significantly elevated, which can lead to severe consequences. Accordingly, two primary strategies have been proposed to address hypercalcemia: using low-calcemic 1,25(OH)2D analogs and promoting tissue-specific de novo synthesis of locally high 1,25(OH)2D concentrations.
Low-calcemic 1,25(OH)2D analogs have been extensively investigated for treating human diseases such as secondary hyperparathyroidism and cancer [9]. The detailed mechanisms by which these 1,25(OH)2D analogs execute other biological functions while reducing the risk of hypercalcemia are not fully understood. Recent data suggest that these analogs can still cause hypercalcemia if present in high concentrations in the bloodstream [10]. In addition, these analogs may have other biological functions that differ from 1,25(OH)2D. Hence, low-calcemic analogs may not be effective at the same concentrations required for optimally executing the full range of non-classical 1,25(OH)2D functions. Accordingly, preclinical data are lacking that support the use of these analogs for autoimmune disease treatment.
We propose that overexpressing 1
Because low-calcemic analogs can still cause hypercalcemia at high concentrations and may have functions that 1,25(OH)2D does not, the de novo synthesis of locally high 1,25(OH)2D concentrations has the unique advantage of not causing hypercalcemia in all disease models that we evaluated. Hence, our data strongly support that de novo synthesis of locally high 1,25(OH)2D concentrations is a valid therapeutic strategy for tissue-specific autoimmune diseases and other diseases linked to vitamin D deficiencies [13, 14]. Challenges to clinical translation may include the need for autologous immune cells as well as potential off-target effects, which our laboratory is addressing.
In conclusion, significant progress has been made in harnessing the novel
1,25(OH)2D therapeutic functions while minimizing the risk of hypercalcemia.
However, several outstanding questions remain. The mechanisms that separate
1,25(OH)2D’s calcium effect from other biological functions are not fully
understood, which is necessary for improving the design of 1,25(OH)2D
analogs. Although some studies using cell-specific ablation of the 1
XT conceptualized, directed, and supervised all the studies and is accountable for all aspects of the work. XT wrote, edited, and approved the final version of this manuscript.
Not applicable.
I am indebted to all my laboratory’s previous and current members for their contributions to this work. I want to thank all the authors who have published works relevant to this field, especially those whose publications cannot be cited here due to space limitations.
This work was partially supported by the American Association of Immunologists (AAI), Careers in Immunology Fellowships (XT); the National Institute of Health (NIH, USA) grant (1R21AI142170, XT); and the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command grant (W81XWH-15-0240, XT).
Given his role as the Guest Editor and Editorial Board member, Xiaolei Tang had no involvement in the peer-review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to Graham Pawelec.
References
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
