Academic Editor

Article Metrics

  • Fig. 1.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 2.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 3.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 4.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 5.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Information

  • Download

  • Contents

Abstract

Backgrounds: Melanogenesis, regulated by genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors, occurs in melanocytes in the basal layer of the epidermis. Dysregulation of this process can lead to various skin disorders, such as hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation. Therefore, the present study investigated the effect of ultrasonic-assisted ethanol extract (SHUE) from Sargassum horneri (S. horneri), brown seaweed against melanogenesis in α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (MSH)-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. Methods: Firstly, yield and proximate compositional analysis of the samples were conducted. The effect of SHUE on cell viability has been evaluated by using 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. After that, the melanin content and cellular tyrosinase activity in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes were examined. Western blot analysis was carried out to investigate the protein expression levels of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF), tyrosinase, tyrosinase-related protein-1 (TRP1), and tyrosinase-related protein-2 (TRP2). In addition, the effect of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) on the melanogenesis process was assessed via Western blotting. Results: As per the analysis, SHUE contained the highest average yield on a dry basis at 28.70 ± 3.21%. The findings showed that SHUE reduced the melanin content and cellular tyrosinase activity in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. Additionally, the expression levels of MITF, TRP1, and TRP2 protein were significantly downregulated by SHUE treatment in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. Moreover, SHUE upregulated the phosphorylation of ERK and AKT in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. In addition, experiments conducted using the ERK inhibitor (PD98059) revealed that the activity of SHUE depends on the ERK signaling cascade. Conclusion: These results suggest that SHUE has an anti-melanogenic effect and can be used as a material in the formulation of cosmetics related to whitening and lightening.

1. Introduction

Human skin, hair, and eye coloration are intricately governed by a biological process called melanogenesis. This process involves synthesizing and distributing melanin, a polymerized pigment originating from the amino acid tyrosine. Beyond its role in coloration, melanin is pivotal in safeguarding the skin against harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation and contributing to overall homeostasis [1]. In addition to being a fundamental interest, understanding the intricate mechanisms of melanogenesis has important implications in various fields, including dermatology, genetics, and cosmetic research.

Melanogenesis begins with the activation of specialized pigment-producing cells known as melanocytes, located in the basal layer of the epidermis, hair follicles, and uveal tract of the eye [2]. Melanocytes derive from melanoblasts originating from embryonic neural crest cells [3] and, in the skin, one melanocyte is surrounded by approximately 36 keratinocytes [4]. Melanogenesis is regulated by a complex interplay of genetic, cellular, and environmental factors. Upon stimulation, melanocytes synthesize and deposit melanin within specialized organelles called melanosomes. These melanosomes are subsequently transported and transferred to adjacent keratinocytes, ultimately enhancing the pigmentation of tissues [4]. The production of eumelanin, which gives brown to black color, and pheomelanin, which imparts yellow to red hues, occurs through additional enzymatic processes. This outcome depends on factors such as the enzyme ratios, substrate availability, and the pH conditions inside melanosomes [4].

Several regulatory mechanisms control melanogenesis, ensuring its fine-tuned regulation in response to physiological and environmental cues. The most notable regulators include α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH), derived from proopiomelanocortin (POMC), and its receptor, melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) [5]. The binding of α-MSH to MC1R leads to increased tyrosinase activity and melanin synthesis [6]. Importantly, genetic factors play a substantial role in determining the regulation and variation of melanogenesis in humans. Moreover, mutations in genes involved in melanin synthesis can lead to various disorders, including albinism, vitiligo, and melanoma, highlighting the clinical relevance of understanding melanogenesis [7].

Understanding the molecular intricacies of melanogenesis has been the subject of intense scientific investigation. Researchers have identified numerous factors involved in melanocyte development, differentiation, and pigment production. Elucidating the signaling pathways, transcription factors, and regulatory elements that govern melanogenesis has provided valuable insights into the complex interplay between genetic determinants and environmental influences [8]. Melanogenesis goes beyond determining pigmentation; it has clinical significance linked to skin disorders. Conditions like melasma and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, for example, stem from excessive melanin production and uneven distribution, leading to hyperpigmentation issues [9].

As per the reports, laboratory scale-70% ethanol extracts of Sargassum spp. found around the Korean Sea indicated tyrosinase inhibitory effects [10]. Another interesting study conducted by S.H. CHA and the team found that Sargassum silquastrum reduced cellular melanin synthesis and tyrosinase activity along with the inhibitory effects on the pigmentation of zebrafish in vivo model [11]. Moreover, M.S. Azam et al. [12] reported that ethanolic extract from Sargassum serratifolium indicated hypo pigmenting properties on B16F10 murine melanocytes. In addition, Sargassum cristaefolium and Sargassum thunbergii have exhibited the inhibitory potential of melanin production in B16F10 murine melanocytes [13, 14]. By considering the potential of Sargassum spp. on skin whitening, Sargassum horneri 70% ethanol extract (SHE70), S. horneri 50% ethanol extract (SHE50), and S. horneri ultrasonic-assisted ethanol extract (SHUE) were screened for their melanin inhibitory potential in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes in this study. Moreover, by taking screening findings into account, an extensive study was designed to reveal whether SHUE indicates potent anti-melanogenic activity on α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes, hypothesizing that SHUE regulates cellular tyrosinase activity as well as melanogenesis-related signaling.

2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Materials

Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT), bovine serum albumin (BSA), ethidium bromide, gallic acid, α-arbutin, and agarose were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (ST. Louis, MO, USA). Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) and a mixture of antibiotics streptomycin and penicillin (P/S) were bought from GibcoBRL (Grand Island, NY, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was obtained from Welgene (Gyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea). D-glucose was purchased from Junsei Chemical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). NE-PER® nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction kit, Pierce™ RIPA buffer, BCA protein assay kit, transfer buffer, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes, and SuperSignal™ West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate, and PageRuler™ Plus pre-stained protein ladder was obtained from Thermo Scientific (Rockford, IL, USA). Antibodies for western blot analysis and normal goat serum were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology Inc. (Beverly, MA, USA) and Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Dallas, TX, USA). All the other chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade.

2.2 Preparation of SHUE, SHE50, and SHE70

S. horneri was collected along the coast of Jeju Island and its species were identified by the Biodiversity Research Institute (Jeju, South Korea). S. horneri was washed with running water and dried at room temperature. The 200 g of dried sample soaked in distilled water and 30 kg of 50% ethanol in water (v/v) were reacted in the ultrasonic apparatus (MD-1200PG, Mirae ultrasonic, Gyeonggi-do, KR) at 4 °C and ultrasonic frequency of 28 kHz. After 5 h, the supernatant was filtered using Whatman No. 6 filter paper (Whatman Maidstone, Buckinghamshire, UK) following centrifugation at 4800 rpm for 10 min. The resulting ultrasonic-assisted S. horneri ethanol extract (SHUE) was concentrated by using rotary evaporation.

For the preparation of ethanol extracts, 150 g of the dried S. horneri powder was separately reacted with 3 L of 50% or 70% ethanol for 12 h at room temperature. Following that, the extracts were centrifuged, and the supernatants were filtered by using a vacuum filtration apparatus. Each supernatant was rotary evaporated and used as SHE50 and SHE70 respectively in the study.

2.3 Compositional Analysis of Extracts

Following the procedures outlined in one of our earlier research, the total polyphenolic content, total protein content, and carbohydrate content of SHE70, SHE50, and SHUE were determined [15]. To assess the phenolic composition, a gradient concentration of gallic acid was used as the reference standard. The total protein content was determined using the Lowry method with BSA as the reference standard, and the carbohydrate content was assessed using the phenol–sulfuric method with d-glucose as the reference standard. The High-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) analysis was implemented to identify fucosterol content in the sample. Waters Alliance e2695 Separations Module (Milford, MA, USA) equipped with Waters 2489 UV/Vis Detector (USA) and YMC Pack-Pro C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm) (Shimogyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan) was used in the analysis. A mixture of ethanol (35%) and acetonitrile (65%) was used as a solvent system in the analysis. Peaks identified in each sample at 210 nm (35 °C) were compared with the standard fucosterol sample dissolved in methanol.

2.4 Cell Culture

The B16F10 murine melanocytes were purchased from the Korean Cell Line Bank (KCLB, Seoul, Republic of Korea). The cells were validated by Short Tandem Repeat (STR) profiling and tested negative for mycoplasma and were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS along with a 1% penicillin/streptomycin antibiotic mixture. A controlled humidified environment with 5% CO2 at 37 °C was maintained throughout the cell culture. The cells were periodically sub-cultured until the growth became exponential. The cells at the exponential growth phase were seeded and used for appropriate experiments.

2.5 Cell Viability Analysis

To examine the cytotoxicity of SHE70, SHE50, and SHUE as well as their cytoprotective effects on B16F10 murine melanocytes against α-MSH stimulation, the MTT assay outlined in the prior study was used [16]. The cells (1 × 104 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates. Following the 24 h incubation, cells were treated with 15.6, 31.3, 62.5, 125, and 250 µg/mL concentrations of SHE70, SHE50, and SHUE for 2 h. Then cells were subjected to stimulation with α-MSH (50 nM) and incubated for 48 h. Subsequently, 15 µL of 5 mg/mL MTT reagent was added to each well and further incubated for 4 h in the dark. After properly aspirating the cell culture media containing MTT, 100 µL of DMSO was added to each well. Absorbances were measured at 570 nm using a SpectraMax M2 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Silicon Valley, CA, USA) after 30 min of shaking in the dark.

2.6 Cellular Melanin Content Analysis

The B16F10 murine melanocytes were seeded in 10 cm cell culture dishes at a density of 3 × 105 cells per plate, using the culture media mentioned in section 2.5. After 24 h of incubation to allow for stabilization in a controlled, humidified environment with 5% CO2 at 37 °C, the culture media in all dishes was replaced with new culture media. Subsequently, each sample and arbutin (at a final concentration of 100 µM) were co-added to all dishes except the control group, as per the experimental design. After 2 h of incubation, cells were stimulated with α-MSH. The cell-cultured dishes were then incubated for 48 h in a controlled, humidified environment with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. The cells were harvested, and cell pellets were obtained by centrifugation at 16,600 ×g at 24 °C for 15 min. The cell pellets were re-suspended, washed with cold PBS, and centrifuged again at 16,600 ×g at 24 °C for 15 min. Subsequently, the washed pellets were incubated at 80 °C for 1 h after being re-suspended in 1 mL of a 1 N NaOH/10% DMSO solution to solubilize the cellular melanin. The optical density of the solubilized solution was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm. The melanin contents (%) were then presented relative to the absorbance of the control group.

2.7 Assessment of Cellular Tyrosinase Inhibitory Potential

Cellular tyrosinase activity was assessed by using cells cultured in 10 cm cell culture dishes. The analysis method was obtained from one of the previous studies [17]. In brief, α-MSH (50 nM) stimulation and SHUE (15.6, 31.3, and 62.5 µg/mL) were co-treated after a 24 h incubation period and then continued for another 24 h. Then cells were harvested, washed with ice-cold PBS, and lysed using PBS containing 1% Triton X-100. The cell lysate supernatants were collected by centrifugation (10,000 ×g for 10 min at 4 °C), and proteins were quantified and normalized. A 90 µL portion of each cell extract (which now contains equal protein levels) was incubated with 10 µL of L-DOPA at 37 °C for 1 h. The resulting dopachrome was observed under 405 nm optical density.

2.8 Western Blot Analysis

Cells were seeded (1 × 106 cells/6 cm dish) for 24 h and treated with different concentrations of SHUE treatment 2 h prior to the α-MSH stimulation. Cells were harvested for AKT, pAKT, ERK, and pERK after 1 h from α-MSH stimulation. MITF was analyzed after 4 h of stimulation, and Tyrosinase, TRP1 and TRP2, were analyzed after 48 h of stimulation [18]. The western blot analysis was conducted by following the method mentioned in our previous study [19]. A NE-PER® nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction kit was then used to harvest and lysis the cells. A total of 35 µg of protein were subjected to electrophoresis on 10% polyacrylamide gels. Resolved protein bands were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes and blocked for 2 h with 5% skim milk in TBST. Then, sequentially incubated with primary (1:1000) and HRP-conjugated secondary (1:3000) antibodies. Identified protein bands were visualized by adding enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent on a Core Bio Davinch-Chemi™ imaging system (Seoul, Korea).

2.9 Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses of the study were performed using the SPSS software (IBM, SPSS Inc., Version 24.0, Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s multiple range tests was used to evaluate the significant variations among data sets, and data were presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). In this study, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results
3.1 Yield and Proximate Composition and Fucosterol Content of S. hornari Extracts

As per the analysis, yield, total carbohydrate content, crude protein content, and total phenolic compound content of each sample were presented in Table 1. The extract yield of three independent replicates indicated the highest average yield on a dry basis was 28.70 ± 3.21% in SHUE. Further, total carbohydrate content, crude protein content, and total phenolic compound content were analyzed for each extract. The carbohydrate content was 8.74 ± 0.16%, crude protein content was 14.31 ± 2.04% and total phenolic compound content was 6.25 ± 0.67% in SHUE. As illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 1. along with Supplementary Table 1, HPLC analysis results indicated that the highest fucosterol content in SHUE sample (6.22 ± 0.06 mg/g) in contrast to the SHE50 and SHE70.

Table 1.Yield, total carbohydrate content, crude protein content, and total phenolic compound content of SHE70, SHE50, and SHUE samples.
Sample Yield (%)1 Carbohydrate (%)1 Crude protein (%)1 Total phenolic compounds (%)1
SHE70 9.98 ± 0.93 4.08 ± 1.02 1.95 ± 0.98 2.38 ± 0.69
SHE50 7.28 ± 1.26 3.35 ± 0.69 1.19 ± 0.81 1.37 ± 0.64
SHUE 28.70 ± 3.21 8.74 ± 0.16 14.31 ± 2.04 6.25 ± 0.67

1Average value was present on a dry basis, mean ± SEM (all experiments were performed in triplicate (n = 3) to determine the repeatability). SHE70, Sargassum horneri 70% ethanol extract; SHE50, S. horneri 50% ethanol extract; SHUE, S. horneri ultrasonic-assisted ethanol extract.

3.2 Effect of S. horneri Extracts on Cell Viability of B16F10 Murine Melanocytes

B16F10 murine melanocytes were treated with 15.6, 31.3, 62.5, 125, and 250 µg/mL concentration of each sample either alone or together with α-MSH for 48 h. As depicted in Fig. 1A,C,E, SHE70, SHE50, and SHUE exhibited no cytotoxicity effect on cells with sample concentrations up to 62.5 µg/mL. In the case of α-MSH-stimulated cells, SHE70, and SHE50 demonstrated no impact on cell viability up to 62.5 µg/mL (Fig. 1B,D,F). Therefore, subsequent experiments were conducted using sample concentrations of 15.6 µg/mL, 31.3 µg/mL, and 62.5 µg/mL.

Fig. 1.

Effect of extracts on B16F10 murine melanocytes. Cytotoxicity analysis of (A) SHE70, (C) SHE50, (E) SHUE, and analysis of the effect on cell viability of (B) SHE70, (D) SHE50, and (F) SHUE. Values were expressed as mean ± SE of triplicate experiments. Columns in the same graph with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

3.3 Effect of SHUE on Melanin Synthesis and Tyrosinase Activity in α-MSH-Stimulated B16F10 Murine Melanocytes

The potential of each sample in inhibiting intracellular melanin synthesis was analyzed and the results illustrated in Fig. 2A indicated significant intracellular melanin inhibitory activity at 31.3 µg/mL of SHUE. Further, as per the results indicated in Fig. 2A, SHUE effectively downregulated the cellular melanin content in a dose-dependent manner in contrast to the α-MSH-stimulated group. A similar trend was observed in the cellular tyrosinase activity (Fig. 2B). Previous studies have mentioned that α-arbutin has the potential to inhibit tyrosinase activity, and research on B16F10 murine melanocytes used α-arbutin as a positive control [20]. According to the literature review, arbutin was used as a commercially available tyrosinase inhibitor in the positive control groups. These results suggest the usability of SHUE as a potent substance in skin whitening studies.

Fig. 2.

Effect of SHUE on melanin synthesis and tyrosinase activity. (A) Effect of SHE70, SHE50, and SHUE on melanin synthesis in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes, and (B) dose-dependent effect of SHUE on cellular tyrosinase activity in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. Values were expressed as mean ± SE of triplicate experiments. Columns in the same graph with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). α-MSH, α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone.

3.4 Effect of SHUE on the Expression of Melanogenesis-Related Proteins in α-MSH-Stimulated B16F10 Murine Melanocytes

Given the significant reduction in melanin content observed with SHUE, the study was extended to investigate its potential impact on the expression of melanogenic enzymes, including tyrosinase and tyrosinase-related proteins (TRPs). Western blot analysis results showed that SHUE downregulated the expression of tyrosinase, TRP1, and TRP2 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3A). Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) has been reported to act as a master transcription factor for the expression of tyrosinase, TRP1, and TRP2 in the process of melanin biosynthesis [21]. In Fig. 3C, the analytical results indicated that SHUE similarly downregulated MITF expression. In addition, relative folds indicated in Fig. 3B,D confirmed the significant downregulation of MITF, tyrosinase, and tyrosinase-related proteins (TRPs) (Original western blot images can be found in Supplementary Fig. 2). Taken together, these data showed the inhibition of melanogenesis by SHUE occurred in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes as downregulating tyrosinase, TRP1, TRP2, and MITF at the transcriptional level.

Fig. 3.

Effect of SHUE on the expression of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-associated melanogenesis-related protein expression. (A,C) Western blot analysis and, (B,D) relative folds. Values were expressed as mean ± SE of triplicate experiments. Columns in the same graph with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

3.5 Effect of SHUE on the Expression of ERK and AKT Signaling Proteins in α-MSH-Stimulated B16F10 Murine Melanocytes

The effect of ERK on the melanogenesis process was assessed via Western blotting. Under α-MSH-stimulated conditions in B16F10 murine melanocytes, the results showed that the presence of SHUE enhances ERK phosphorylation, as depicted in Fig. 4A,B. The relationship between PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and melanogenesis in melanocytes has been described in a previous study [21]. As expected, the phosphorylation of AKT molecules was also upregulated by SHUE (Fig. 4C,D).

Fig. 4.

Effect of SHUE on the expression of ERK and AKT signaling proteins in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. (A) Western blot analysis of ERK signaling, and (B) relative folds. (C) Western blot analysis of AKT signaling, and (D) relative folds. Values were expressed as mean ± SE of triplicate experiments. Columns in the same graph with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

3.6 Effect of the PD98059 in α-MSH-Stimulated B16F10 Murine Melanocytes with SHUE

With the addition of an ERK inhibitor (PD98059), the ERK phosphorylation is decreased in the SHUE-treated cells (Fig. 5A,B). Simultaneously, MITF and tyrosinase indicated expression level changes toward melanogenesis with the treatment of PD98059. This process occurs through the ERK-involved signaling pathway in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. As illustrated in Fig. 5C, co-treatment of PD98059 along with SHUE has indicated no significant effect in reducing intracellular melanin content in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes.

Fig. 5.

Effect of the PD98059 in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. (A) Effect of ERK inhibitor on ERK signaling and related protein expression, and (B) its relative folds. (C) The effect of ERK inhibitor along with SHUE treatment on attenuating intracellular melanin content in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. Values were expressed as mean ± SE of triplicate experiments. Columns in the same graph with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

Skin whitening products have gained popularity among consumers worldwide, with an estimated 15% of the global population engaging in their use. As reported in 2022, approximately $13 billion was expended on skincare and cosmetic products alone in the Asia-Pacific region [22]. Unfortunately, the global circulation of skin-lightening cosmetics containing illicit and hazardous ingredients is readily available in various countries and sold through both conventional and online ways [23]. With health concerns, the quest for naturally available multidisciplinary drugs for skin whitening is of paramount significance in dermatological research [24]. Such compounds hold the potential to address hyperpigmentation and other skin-related issues while minimizing adverse effects [24]. Natural ingredients offer a promising avenue to develop safe and effective cosmeceutical agents, as they often encompass a range of bioactive compounds with complementary mechanisms of action [25]. By revealing the power of natural sources, we can tap into a wealth of biodiversity and traditional knowledge, accelerating the discovery of novel compounds for achieving even skin tone. This pursuit aligns with the growing demand for safer alternatives in the cosmetics and dermatology industries, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach to skin whitening that prioritizes both efficacy and safety.

In the present study, we prepared the three different extracts (SHE50, SHE70, and SHUE) based on two extraction approaches, room temperature S. horneri ethanol extraction and ultrasonic assisted ethanol extraction. The ultrasonic-assisted ethanol extraction method and room temperature ethanol extraction method which were used in this study are both implemented in extracting compounds from botanical materials, yet they diverge in efficiency and the techniques used. The ultrasonic-assisted ethanol extraction method utilizes high-frequency sound waves to enhance the extraction process. This results in increased penetration of the solvent into the plant matrix [26]. It facilitates the extraction of target compounds more rapidly and efficiently compared to room temperature extraction, which relies solely on the natural diffusion of the solvent. Moreover, ultrasonic-assisted extraction typically requires shorter extraction times and lower temperatures, thus preserving thermally sensitive compounds better [27]. On the other hand, room-temperature ethanol extraction is simpler and more accessible, requiring no specialized equipment. Results obtained from the compositional analysis as well as HLPC analysis for the target compound (Fucosterol) indicated that SHUE consists of a higher yield and a better intracellular melanin reduction potential in contrast to the other two extracts in the preliminary investigation.

When discussing melanogenesis, the key enzyme namely tyrosinase which is a copper-containing glycoprotein catalyzes the hydroxylation of L-tyrosine to L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA). Subsequently, L-DOPA is converted to dopaquinone [28]. Recent studies have shed light on the role of microenvironmental factors in melanogenesis. For instance, UV radiation is a potent inducer of melanin production, acting through the activation of various signaling cascades, including the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway [4, 29]. UV exposure triggers DNA damage and oxidative stress, leading to the activation of melanocyte-stimulating factors and the upregulation of melanogenic enzymes. These adaptive responses serve as a protective mechanism against UV-induced DNA damage by increasing the production and distribution of melanin [30]. In addition to UV radiation, other environmental factors, such as hormonal changes, inflammation, and chemical exposure, can influence melanogenesis. Hormones, particularly estrogens, have been shown to modulate melanocyte function and melanin synthesis [31]. Inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandins and cytokines, can disrupt melanogenesis by altering the expression and activity of melanogenic enzymes [9]. A neuropeptide hormone, α-MSH, plays a pivotal role in the regulation of melanogenesis, particularly in B16F10 murine melanocytes. It has the ability to exert its effects through binding to the MC1R on the surface of melanocytes [29]. As reported, activation of MC1R triggers a signaling cascade that culminates in increased production of melanin [5]. So far, research on the regulation of melanin production has implemented α-MSH as a positive inducer [32]. Furthermore, various cytokines, growth factors, and signaling pathways modulate melanogenesis. For instance, endothelin-1 (ET-1), secreted by keratinocytes and fibroblasts, enhances the production and release of α-MSH and other melanogenic factors [33]. As per the analysis results obtained from the present study, α-MSH has no cytotoxic effect on the B16F10 murine melanocytes. Interestingly, the treatment of B16F10 murine melanocytes with SHUE did not show any signs of cytotoxicity up to the concentration of 125 µg/mL. Based on the statistical analysis, 15.6, 31.3, and 62.5 µg/mL have no significant cytotoxicity, therefore, further investigations were conducted with these concentrations on the α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. With satisfactory results, the study was extended to demonstrate the inhibitory mechanism of SHUE in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes.

Intracellular melanin content correlates directly with the activity of tyrosinase [17]. To begin assessing the impact of SHUE on α-MSH-induced melanogenesis, our initial step involved examining whether SHUE could inhibit melanin synthesis in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. Results indicated that SHUE significantly suppressed the α-MSH-induced melanin production and simultaneously indicated the notable reduction of intracellular tyrosinase activity in B16F10 murine melanocytes in contrast to the control group. Tyrosinase serves as a crucial rate-limiting enzyme that regulates the pace of melanin synthesis. Consequently, a reduction in the activity of tyrosinase leads to a decrease in melanin production [34]. Numerous prior research studies have documented compounds extracted from natural sources as well as brown seaweed extracts effectively curbed tyrosinase activity, resulting in the inhibition of melanin production [35].

Many similar studies about natural extracts or compounds have shown that they directly inhibit the catalytic activity of tyrosinase by regulating the molecular structure [36, 37, 38]. However, the cell lysate contained tyrosinase as well as TRP-1, TRP-2, and various other signaling molecules. Following the reveal of the potential of SHUE to suppress tyrosinase activity in this study, we resolved to investigate how SHUE regulates the expression of proteins involved in melanin synthesis. Moreover, the mechanism behind its suppression of melanin production was investigated. TRP-2, one of the enzymes involved in melanin synthesis, catalyzes the reaction from DOPA chrome to 5,6-dihydroxyindole-2-carboxylic acid (DHICA) [39]. Therefore, like tyrosinase, a decrease in the protein expression level of TRP-2 is considered a cause of melanin production suppression. MITF is the transcription factor of tyrosinase, TRP-1, and TRP-2; and it is known as the most important transcription factor in melanin production. Protein expression analyzed by western blotting revealed that the expression levels of tyrosinase, TRP-1, and TRP-2 were significantly decreased by the SHUE treatment in stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. Furthermore, the expression of MITF was also decreased by the SHUE treatment in stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. Findings of the study suggest that SHUE suppresses tyrosinase activity, based on the downregulation of tyrosinase and MITF expression levels, resulting in the suppression of melanin synthesis. Recent studies indicate that the ERK kinase cascade and the AKT pathway play roles in regulating melanin synthesis. As reported, they trigger MITF phosphorylation, which breaks it down and ultimately reduces melanin production when ERK and AKT are activated [40]. Moreover, the melanocyte differentiation program activates the MITF expression. Therefore, this cascade is consistent with the idea that MITF is a master regulator of melanogenesis. In addition, MITF is a nuclear mediator of Wnt signals during melanocyte differentiation by inhibiting Glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β), and stimulation of β-catenin accumulation. Furthermore, GSk3β is implicated in regulating melanogenesis. Inhibition of GSk3β activity could increase melanin synthesis through Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation. Therefore, activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway may increase melanin production [41]. As an extension to the study, we focused on the ERK and AKT pathways, which promote the degradation of MITF or inhibit the transcriptional activity; and examined their relationship with the SHUE inhibitory effect on melanin production. In this experiment, we identified that the most important factors in the SHUE downregulating effects were AKT and ERK phosphorylation in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. Further, we verified the involvement of ERK with the ERK inhibitor in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. The results suggest that although a higher dose of SHUE has some cytotoxicity, it still has the potential as an effective whitening agent for in vivo studies.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our study indicates that SHUE effectively inhibits melanin synthesis and tyrosinase activity by targeting the ERK pathway, leading to the suppression of MITF, tyrosinase, TRP-1, and TRP-2 in α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 murine melanocytes. This suggests the potential utility of SHUE as a therapeutic agent for treating hyperpigmentation and as an effective ingredient in skin whitening and lightening cosmetics. Nonetheless, it is essential to emphasize that safety should remain paramount in future practical applications, particularly in in vivo studies.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception and design of the research study. KGISK, AMKJ, CIK, and YSA performed the research. SJH, JYO, EAK, SHC and GA provided help and advice on the experiments. KGISK, AMKJ, SJH, and EAK performed data analysis, curation, and visualization. SHC confirmed the reproduction of the results. CIK, YSA, JYO, and GA provided funding and resources. CIK, YSA, and GA were responsible for overall project supervision. KGISK wrote the draft manuscript, and AMKJ, CIK, YSA, SJH, JYO and EAK contributed to its review and editing. SHC and GA conceived the manuscript and contributed to its review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

S. horneri was collected along the West coast of Jeju island. And sample was identified by the Biodiversity Research Institute in Jeju, South Korea (voucher specimen number is SH2017J005).

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Technology Development Program (S3266086) funded by the Ministry of SMEs and Startups (MSS, Korea).

Conflict of Interest

Given Dr. Seon-Heui Cha’s role as an editorial board member, Dr. Seon-Heui Cha was not involved in the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to Marcello Iriti. Mr. Chang-Ik Ko and Yong-Seok Ahn work researchers at Choung Ryong Fisheries Co., Ltd. as researchers and were involved ultrasonic extract preparation and provided it for the study. All responsibility for this article was delegated to Dr. Seon-Heui Cha and Dr. Ginnae Ahn. Other authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.