1 Department of Gynecology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, 710032 Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
2 Department of Gynecology, The First People’s Hospital of Jintan, 213200 Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
3 Department of Gynecology, Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital, 213200 Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
†These authors contributed equally.
Abstract
From an immunological perspective, changes in cytokine levels can shift the immune response, potentially affecting the development of endometrial polyps (EPs). The relationship between the balance of T helper 1 (Th1)/T helper 2 (Th2) and T helper 17 (Th17)/Regulatory T (Treg) cytokines and the pathogenesis of EPs is an area of ongoing research. This study aims to investigate the role of Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg immune imbalances in the pathogenesis of EPs.
A total of 79 patients were included in this prospective laboratory-based study. The experimental group included 20 patients with single EPs, 20 with multiple EPs, and 19 with postmenopausal EPs. The control group included 20 individuals with proliferative endometriums. Immunohistochemical staining was performed to investigate the expression of interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-17 (IL-17), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ).
The levels of TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-17 and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) in the single EP group were higher than in the control group (pTNF-α = 0.001, pIFN-γ < 0.001, pIL-17 < 0.001, pTGF-β < 0.001), while the level of IL-6 in the stroma was lower than in the control group (pIL-6 < 0.001). The levels of IL-2, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-17 and TGF-β in the glands of the multiple EPs group were higher than in the glands of the control group (pIL-2 = 0.041, pIFN-γ < 0.001, pIL-4 = 0.044, pIL-17 < 0.001, pTGF-β < 0.001). The levels of IL-4, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17 in the postmenopausal single polyp group were lower than in the total control group (pIL-4 = 0.020, pIL-6 = 0.002, pTNF-α < 0.001, pIL-17 = 0.006), while the levels of IL-2, IFN-γ and TGF-β in the glands were higher than in the control group (pIL-2 = 0.002, pIFN-γ = 0.002, pTGF-β = 0.005).
Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg immune imbalances are one of the causes of EPs.
Keywords
- endometrial polyps
- Th1/Th2
- Th17/Treg
- cytokines
Endometrial polyps (EPs) are composed of endometrial glands and fibrotic endometrial stroma with thick-walled blood vessels [1]. They can be single or multiple, with diameters ranging from several millimeters to several centimeters [2]. EPs often occur in 40–50-year-old and postmenopausal women [3]. Up to 82% of EP patients have no clinical symptoms, and a few may show abnormal uterine bleeding [4].
The formation of EPs may be related to the imbalance of estrogen and progesterone receptors, inflammation, oxidative stress, abnormal expression of cytokines, and an imbalance between cell proliferation and apoptosis [5, 6, 7, 8]. Evidence suggests that EPs are closely related to estrogen. However, after menopause, despite the decline in ovarian function and the decrease in systemic circulating estrogen levels, the incidence of EPs does not decrease. A study has found that postmenopausal EP is mainly due to the absolute lack of progesterone, which results in the improper functioning of progesterone receptors, thereby promoting the development of EPs [9].
From the perspective of immunology, the change in cytokines may cause the entire
immune response to shift in a certain direction, resulting in a completely
different outcome. Helper T cells (Th) and regulatory T cells (Treg), both
subsets of CD4+ T lymphocytes, play pivotal roles in immune modulation and
stimulation [10]. The cytokines secreted by these cells are intimately associated
with the processes of inflammation and cellular proliferation. In recent years,
with the discovery of Th17 cells, the traditional Th1/Th2 balance model has been
further developed into the T helper 1 (Th1)/T helper 2 (Th2) and T helper 17
(Th17)/Regulatory T (Treg) balance model [11]. Under normal circumstances, the
number of these subsets of cells maintains a dynamic balance through the mutual
regulation of cytokines secreted by them, and participates in the regulation of
body immunity. It has been found that the subsets of Th1, Th2, Th17 and Treg
cytokines, representative of CD4+ T cells, are related to the development of
EPs. However, the relationship between the equilibrium state of Th1/Th2,
Th17/Treg and EPs in EPs has not been reported. In this experiment, Th1
representative cytokines such as interleukin-2 (IL-2), tumor necrosis
factor-
This prospective laboratory-based study was approved by the Ethics Committee of
the Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital (approval number: 202123). A total of 79
patients were included in this study conducted at our hospital from August 2020
to April 2021. The experimental group consisted of 59 patients, including 20
patients in the single polyp group, 20 patients in the multiple polyps group
(number of polyps
Inclusion criteria: (1) transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography suggested the possibility of EPs. (2) Patients who signed informed consent and were willing to cooperate with the treatment. (3) Clinical and pathological data of all patients could be collected through inpatient and outpatient information systems, including age, body mass index (BMI), previous EPs operation history, etc.
Exclusion criteria: (1) Pathological type was atypical hyperplasia or endometrial carcinoma. (2) Patients who had received hormone therapy in the past three months, including those with autoimmune, allergic and acute inflammatory diseases, as well as serious internal and surgical diseases. (3) Patients with an intrauterine device (IUD). (4) Patients suffering from uterine leiomyoma, adenomyoma and endometriosis. (5) Patients diagnosed with EPs during pregnancy.
After routine preoperative preparation, KARL STORZ video hysteroscopy was performed
within 3–7 days after menstruation. The procedure is as follows: dilate the
uterus with normal saline, uterine pressure is controlled to
12
The expression levels of Th1 (TNF-
Cytokine density was analyzed by evaluating tissue segments at a magnification
of
The antibodies were from Boster Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei, China:
Rabbit anti-human IL2 Antibody (1:400; Cat# BA1644-1); Rabbit anti-human IL-4
Monoclonal antibody (1:400; Cat# 66142-1-Ig); Rabbit anti-human IL-6 polyclonal
antibody (1:100; Cat# 66146-1-Ig); Mouse anti-human IL-17 monoclonal antibody
(1:40; Cat# 66148-1-Ig); Rabbit anti-human TNF-
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0 software (version 25.0;
IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The normality of the data was assessed using the
Shapiro-Wilk test, and homogeneity of variances was tested using Levene’s test.
For continuous variables with normal distribution, analysis was performed using
an independent-samples t test, and the data were expressed as mean
In the first phase of the study, EPs were evaluated using a magnification of
Fig. 1.
The number of positive cells for IL-2 (black arrow) in the gland was significantly higher in B and C than in group D. (A) Single EP; (B) multiple EPs; (C) postmenopausal EP; (D) Control group. IL-2, interleukin-2; EPs, endometrial polyps. Scale bar: 200 μm (line 1); Scale bar: 50 μm (line 2).
Fig. 2.
The number of positive cells for IL-4 (black arrow) in the stroma was lower in group C than in group D. (A) Single EP; (B) multiple EPs; (C) postmenopausal EP; (D) Control group. IL-4, interleukin-4. Scale bar: 200 μm (line 1); Scale bar: 50 μm (line 2).
Fig. 3.
The number of positive cells for IL-6 (black arrow) in the stroma and gland was significantly lower in groups A, B and C than in group D. (A) Single EP; (B) multiple EPs; (C) postmenopausal EP; (D) Control group. IL-6, interleukin-6. Scale bar: 200 μm (line 1); Scale bar: 50 μm (line 2).
Fig. 4.
The number of positive cells for IL-17 (black arrow) in the epithelium and gland was significantly different in group A, B than in group D. (A) Single EP; (B) multiple EPs; (C) postmenopausal EP; (D) Control group. IL-17, interleukin-17. Scale bar: 200 μm (line 1); Scale bar: 50 μm (line 2).
Fig. 5.
The number of positive cells for TNF-
Fig. 6.
The number of positive cells for IFN-
In the comparison between the single polyp group and the control group: the
total number of TNF-
In the comparison between the Multiple polyps group and the control group: the
total number of IL-2, TNF-
In the comparison between the postmenopausal single polyp group and the control
group: the total number of IL-4, IL-6, TNF-
| Group | Cytokine | Cytokine expression in different locations (Immunohistochemical count, per 40 | |||
| Epithelium | Stroma | Gland | Total | ||
| Control group (n = 20) | |||||
| IL-17 | 30.12 |
69.00 (48.25, 128.25) | 53.00 (44.75, 66.62) | 48.0 (30.50, 70.00) | |
| IL-2 | 34.58 |
118.25 (74.75, 186.00) | 42.75 (19.25, 58.50) | 44.75 (26.88, 74.38) | |
| IL-4 | 43.92 |
189.25 |
54.95 |
55.00 (43.00, 165.88) | |
| IL-6 | 53.50 |
292.18 |
82.50 (62.12, 94.88) | 82.50 (57.75, 265.25) | |
| TNF- |
47.00 (43.75, 52.62) | 84.25 (38.75, 153.25) | 84.33 |
62.75 (44.75, 96.88) | |
| IFN- |
33.75 (24.38, 42.75) | 81.25 (44.00, 129.38) | 44.25 (22.50, 53.25) | 44.00 (24.50, 63.75) | |
| TGF- |
22.15 |
48.00 (16.50, 79.00) | 36.50 (15.75, 47.25) | 28.25 (16.25, 48.25) | |
| Single polyp group vs. Control group (n = 20) | |||||
| IL-17 | 50.80 |
255.18 |
138.00 (124.12, 150.88)*** | 136.50 (54.75, 208.50)*** | |
| IL-2 | 37.71 |
39.50 (10.00, 168.75) | 42.00 (16.00, 69.25) | 39.50 (15.50, 64.00) | |
| IL-4 | 40.60 |
166.75 |
64.72 |
61.75 (43.88, 109.12) | |
| IL-6 | 45.62 |
188.40 |
78.42 |
77.75 (49.38, 157.50) | |
| TNF- |
51.25 (47.12, 69.75) | 239.25 (112.50, 260.38)** | 120.90 |
104.50 (58.38, 150.12)** | |
| IFN- |
58.33 |
216.75 |
92.45 |
89.25 (51.62, 173.38)*** | |
| TGF- |
44.95 |
125.92 |
72.65 |
69.75 (46.38, 97.12)*** | |
| Multiple polyps group vs. Control group (n = 20) | |||||
| IL-17 | 47.08 |
182.18 |
97.40 |
95.75 (60.38, 134.62)*** | |
| IL-2 | 41.27 |
141.57 |
51.75 (38.88, 79.75)* | 56.25 (39.50, 119.62)* | |
| IL-4 | 49.15 |
196.35 |
80.45 |
75.25 (54.25, 158.5)* | |
| IL-6 | 46.05 |
247.32 |
103.88 |
103.25 (50.62, 193.00) | |
| TNF- |
57.75 (47.38, 63.12) | 209.50 (34.75, 258.25) | 105.20 |
89.75 (50.25, 142.00)* | |
| IFN- |
53.60 |
240.25 (148.88, 265.62)** | 101.30 |
81.50 (56.38, 169.38)*** | |
| TGF- |
42.00 (33.50, 49.25)*** | 149.95 |
90.38 |
81.25 (42.75, 127.12)*** | |
| Postmenopausal single polyps vs. Control group (n = 19) | |||||
| IL-17 | 25.79 |
33.00 (26.50, 72.50)** | 53.00 (32.50, 60.50) | 34.00 (23.00, 59.00)** | |
| IL-2 | 35.32 |
148.08 |
60.39 |
57.50 (37.50, 108.50) | |
| IL-4 | 29.92 |
84.76 |
51.82 |
48.00 (31.00, 68.00)* | |
| IL-6 | 31.37 |
140.58 |
79.42 |
58.50 (31.00, 111.50)** | |
| TNF- |
30.61 |
44.00 (31.25, 80.50)* | 46.50 (42.50, 52.00)** | 41.00 (29.50, 48.00)*** | |
| IFN- |
31.11 |
50.97 |
72.37 |
49.50 (29.00, 70.50) | |
| TGF- |
24.76 |
17.00 (11.25, 38.00)* | 54.82 |
29.50 (17.00, 47.00) | |
Data indicates the number of positive cells. ***p
The total number of cells positive for IL-17 (pIL-17
Fig. 7.
Comparison of Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg Cytokine Expression Levels in Polyp Tissues among the Three Experimental Groups. (A) Comparison of Th17/Treg Cytokine Expression in Polyp
Tissues between Group 1 and Group 2. (B) Comparison of Th1/Th2 Cytokine
Expression in Polyp Tissues between Group 1 and Group 2. (C) Comparison of
Th17/Treg Cytokine Expression in Polyp Tissues between Group 1 and Group 3. (D)
Comparison of Th1/Th2 Cytokine Expression in Polyp Tissues between Group 1 and
Group 3. Group 1: single group; Group 2: multiple group; Group 3: postmenopausal
group. *p
The total number of positive cells for IL-17 (pIL-17
In this study, we found that: (1) In the tissue of patients with single and multiple Eps, the balance of Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg subsets of CD4+ T cells shifted to Th1 and Th17, which may be an important reason for the occurrence of EPs in the single polyp group. (2) Compared with the multiple polyps group, the cellular immune balance Th17/Treg of EPs in the single polyp group shifted more significantly to Th17, indicating that the shift of Th17/Treg balance to Th17 was not more pronounced with the increase in the number of polyps. (3) Different from premenopausal single and multiple EPs, in the postmenopausal EP patients, the balance of Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg subsets of CD4+ T cells shifts to Th1 and Treg, which may be an important cause of postmenopausal EP.
Th1 cells primarily secrete IL-2, TNF-
Th2 cells stimulate B cells to produce antibodies, promote eosinophil and mast cell differentiation, inhibit immune inflammation and reduce tissue damage. In this study, we found that there was a low expression of Th2 cytokines in both single and postmenopausal EP patients, which was consistent with another study: during the proliferative phase of the endometrium, the contents of IL-6 and IL-10 in uterine lavage fluid of EPs patients increased significantly [16]. Based on this, we can speculate that the low expression of Th2 cytokines and insufficient immune protection lead to the occurrence of EPs.
Under normal circumstances, Th1 and Th2 cells are in dynamic balance and
interact with negative feedback regulation. In normal reproductive women, the
balance of Th1/Th2 cells moves to Th2 [17]. The results showed that the
expression levels of Th1 cytokines IL-2, IFN-
Th17 cells are a new class of CD4+ T cell subsets that can secrete IL-17 at
high levels and participate in inflammatory responses and autoimmune diseases
[18]. In this study, we found that IL-17 was highly expressed in the epithelium,
stroma and glands of Eps in both the single and multiple polyps group. Some
studies have found that the Th17 response is up-regulated in the peripheral blood
of patients with EPs, leading to increased secretion of many pro-inflammatory
factors, such as IFN-
Treg cells secrete TGF-
This study had several limitations. First, the sample size collected for the study is limited; except for 19 cases of postmenopausal single polyps, there were only 20 cases in each of the other groups. However, it meets the minimum sample size required for statistical analysis. In addition, this study only involved experimental analysis of specimens collected from surgeries of EP patients. As the research is still ongoing, we did not choose to include peripheral blood for further validation analysis. Furthermore, the expression of cytokines in this study was assessed using immunohistochemistry, rather than the more commonly used and more precise flow cytometry. Finally, this study was limited to finding the differential expression of inflammatory factors in EPs and cannot directly prove a causal relationship.
To sum up, the regulation of the uterine environment depends not only on the balance of Th1/Th2 cells but also on the balance of Th17/Treg cells. In the tissues of patients with single and multiple EPs, the balance of CD4+ T cell subsets Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg shifts towards Th1 and Th17. Compared with the multiple group, the cellular immune Th17/Treg balance of EPs in the single group shifted more significantly to Th17, indicating that the shift of Th17/Treg balance to Th17 was not more obvious with the increase of the number of polyps. In the tissues of postmenopausal EPs patients, the balance of CD4+ T cell subsets Th1/Th2 and Th17/Treg shifts towards Th1 and Treg expression, and the specific mechanism needs to be further studied.
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
HY and SL designed the research study. HY and LB performed the research. SL and LB provided help and advice on the immunohistochemistry. HY analyzed the data. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Changzhou No. 2 People’s Hospital (approval number: 202123).
We would like to express our gratitude to all those who helped us during the writing of this manuscript. Thanks to all the peer reviewers for their opinions and suggestions.
This project was supported by the research project (Grant No.: ZD202343).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.







