IMR Press / RCM / Volume 24 / Issue 7 / DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2407188
Open Access Review
Conduits and Strategies for Arterial Revascularization in CABG
Show Less
1 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
*Correspondence: mfg9004@med.cornell.edu (Mario Gaudino)
Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 24(7), 188; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2407188
Submitted: 17 November 2022 | Revised: 31 December 2022 | Accepted: 6 January 2023 | Published: 30 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surgical Strategies for Total Arterial Myocardial Revascularization)
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. Depending on the severity of the coronary artery disease, treatment options include percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Although CABG has been performed since the 1970s, there is still debate onwhich conduit to use after the left internal thoracic artery. Currently, national registries report the left internal thoracic artery and the saphenous vein as the most commonly used conduits in CABG, while other arterial grafts, such as the radial artery, represent a minority, even though the current evidence suggests potential benefits of these arterial conduits. In this review, we aimed to describe the different types of arterial conduits used for CABG and summarize the evidence behind their use.

Keywords
CABG
coronary artery bypass grafting
internal thoracic artery
radial artery
multiple arterial grafting
Figures
Fig. 1.
Share
Back to top