-
- Academic Editors
-
-
-
Background: Prevention of stroke by anticoagulation is essential in
patients with Atrial fibrillation (AF); with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
being preferred over warfarin in most patients. The Long-term efficacy and safety
of DOACs vs. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO) remain unknown.
Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus) were searched
from inception to February 10th, 2021. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular
mortality. Secondary outcomes included incidence of ischemic stroke/transient
ischemic attack (TIA) and systemicembolism. The safety endpoint was clinically
relevant bleeding (a composite of major or minor clinically relevant bleeding).
Results: A total of three studies with 3039 participants (LAAO = 1465;
DOACs = 1574) were included. Mean age was 74.2 and 75.3 years in the LAAO and
DOAC group respectively. Average follow-up period was 2 years. There was no
difference in terms of cardiac mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.40–2.03; p
= 0.81), ischemic stroke/TIA (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.80–1.65; p = 0.46;
I