IMR Press / RCM / Volume 24 / Issue 2 / DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2402044
Open Access Systematic Review
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO) vs Direct Oral Anticoagulation (DOAC) in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Show Less
1 Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. N.T.R University of Health Sciences, 520008 Vijayawada, India
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
3 Department of Internal Medicine, Jalalabad Ragib Rabeya Medical College and Hospital, 3030 Sylhet, Bangladesh
4 Department of Medicine, Saba University School of Medicine, JQG3+87 The Bottom, Netherland Antilles
5 Department of Medicine, Akhtar Saeed Medical and Dental College, 54000 Lahore, Pakistan
6 Department of Medicine, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ 07601, USA
7 Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, 74200 Karachi, Pakistan
8 Department of Internal Medicine, Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, NY 10305, USA
9 Section of Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of. California San Diego, San Diego, CA 92111, USA
10 Section of Electrophysiology, UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
11 Section of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Robert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
*Correspondence: husseia@ccf.org (Ayman A. Hussein)
Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 24(2), 44; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2402044
Submitted: 25 March 2022 | Revised: 1 October 2022 | Accepted: 12 October 2022 | Published: 2 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation)
Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Background: Prevention of stroke by anticoagulation is essential in patients with Atrial fibrillation (AF); with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) being preferred over warfarin in most patients. The Long-term efficacy and safety of DOACs vs. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO) remain unknown. Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus) were searched from inception to February 10th, 2021. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes included incidence of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and systemicembolism. The safety endpoint was clinically relevant bleeding (a composite of major or minor clinically relevant bleeding). Results: A total of three studies with 3039 participants (LAAO = 1465; DOACs = 1574) were included. Mean age was 74.2 and 75.3 years in the LAAO and DOAC group respectively. Average follow-up period was 2 years. There was no difference in terms of cardiac mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.40–2.03; p = 0.81), ischemic stroke/TIA (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.80–1.65; p = 0.46; I2 = 0) and clinically significant bleeding (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.50–1.17; p = 0.22; I2 = 69) between the groups. Conclusions: Among patients with AF, LAAO was comparable to DOACs with similar efficacy and safety profiles.

Keywords
left atrial appendage occlusion
atrial fibrillation
direct oral anticoagulation
ischemic stroke
bleeding
Figures
Fig. 1.
Share
Back to top