Academic Editor

Article Metrics

  • Fig. 1.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 2.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 3.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 4.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Information

  • Download

  • Contents

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) have changes in whole-brain network characteristics and intracerebral node characteristics in the structural network, and whether there is a difference between SCD with and without Apolipoprotein E4 (APOEε4). Methods: This cross-sectional study included 36 individuals without SCD without APOEε4 (healthy control, HC group), 21 individuals with SCD with APOEε4 (APOEε4+ group), and 33 individuals with SCD without APOEε4 (APOEε4- group). The white matter structural network was constructed using the fractional anisotropy (FA) based deterministic fiber tracking method. Graph theory was used to analyze the whole-brain network characteristics and intracerebral node characteristics of the three groups. Results: Regarding the whole-brain network characteristics, all three groups exhibited small-worldness in their structural networks. The clustering coefficient (Cp) and local efficiency (Eloc) in the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups were significantly lower than in the HC group (p < 0.05), but no significant difference in Cp or Eloc was observed between the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups. Regarding intracerebral node characteristics, there were significant differences in some brain regions, mainly the default mode network (DMN), the occipital lobe, the temporal lobe, and subcortical regions. The change in intracerebral node characteristics was different between the APOEε4+ group and the APOEε4- group. Conclusions: Individuals with SCD demonstrate changes in whole-brain network characteristics and intracerebral node characteristics in the structural network. Moreover, differences exist between APOEε4+ and APOEε4- individuals.

1. Introduction

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is often one of the earliest symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [1, 2], in which individuals report experiencing cognitive decline but still achieve normal results in objective neuropsychological assessments [3]. Increasingly recognized as a crucial early sign of the pathological processes underlying AD, this condition underscores the importance of early detection and intervention strategies to potentially alter the disease’s trajectory.

In the context of genetic influences on AD, Apolipoprotein E4 (APOEε4) has been identified as a significant risk factor [4]. Its impact, especially on individuals with SCD, has become a focal point of recent research [5]. Studies indicate that the APOEε4 allele might accelerate cognitive decline in these individuals [6], yet the intricate mechanisms underlying these effects, particularly in the context of structural brain networks, remain unclear. This study aims to delve into the influence of APOEε4 on SCD, building on the findings of Lee et al. [7], who observed specific changes in the fractional anisotropy (FA) values in certain brain regions of SCD individuals carrying the APOEε4 allele.

Diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) is instrumental in this research, offering a window into the microstructural integrity of brain tissues by analyzing water molecule diffusion patterns. DTI’s role in AD studies has been pivotal, particularly in detecting early microstructural neuronal changes that precede more significant atrophic developments [8, 9]. Extensive quantitative DTI studies have reported various findings in individuals with SCD, ranging from significant alterations in FA and mean diffusivity (MD) in critical brain regions like the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex to contradictory results showing no statistical differences in dispersion parameters [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16].

However, these studies primarily focused on quantifying DTI parameter differences without a broader investigation into the structural network. Building on the work of Shu et al. [17], who reported changes in global and local efficiency in the structural networks of SCD individuals, and Yan et al. [18], who found reduced efficiency and increased shortest path length in certain brain regions, our study aims to further investigate these aspects. Specifically, we seek to understand the potential impact of the APOEε4 allele on the structural network of individuals with SCD.

To achieve this, we analyzed data from 36 individuals without SCD and APOEε4 (healthy control, HC group) and 54 individuals with SCD from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, including 21 individuals with SCD carrying APOEε4 (APOEε4+ group) and 33 individuals with SCD but without APOEε4 (APOEε4- group). The study employs an FA-based deterministic fiber tracking method and graph theory analysis to explore the white matter structural network and its characteristics across these groups, focusing on discerning the role of the APOEε4 allele in modulating structural network attributes in SCD.

2. Methods
2.1 Study Subjects

All raw data used in this study were from the ADNI. The ADNI is a multi-center study originated by Michael W. Weiner in 2004 for the early detection, tracking, treatment, and prevention of AD. The baseline data, neuropsychological assessment, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, APOE genotyping information, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data were collected for each study subject. The ADNI passed a review by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), and all subjects provided written informed consent and unified inclusion criteria (https://adni.loni.usc.edu/). We obtained the approval of our local ethics review committee (Dongguan Eighth People’s Hospital medical ethics committee AF/SC-15/01.0) before the analysis began. To investigate the impact of APOEε4, this study enrolled 36 individuals in the HC group. Additionally, 21 individuals in the APOEε4+ group, characterized by carrying at least one ε4 allele (i.e., ε4/ε4, ε4/ε3), and 33 individuals in the APOEε4- group, comprising those with other alleles (i.e., ε2/ε2, ε2/ε3, ε3/ε3), were included. Individuals with ε2/ε4 were excluded due to the potential for confounding effects [19]. Including the HC group as a control provides a baseline for clearer observation of the role of APOEε4 alleles in SCD.

The following diagnostic criteria [3] were used for individuals with SCD: (1) the patient complained of memory deterioration, without memory decline or impairment as indicated by the caregiver; (2) Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score: 24 to 30; and (3) Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) score: 0. The inclusion criteria for the HC group were as follows: (1) no memory decline or impairment indicated by the individuals or caregivers; and (2) normal MMSE and CDR scores, with identical score criteria to individuals with SCD. The demographic characteristics and neuropsychological data included sex, age, education level, and MMSE. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers included total tau (t-tau), phosphorylated tau181 (p-tau181), and β-amyloid protein 1–42 (Aβ1-42). The cerebrospinal fluid data were available for all subjects.

2.2 Image Acquisition and Preprocessing

Both structural MRI and DTI data were available in all included subjects. The subjects were scanned by a 3.0 T MRI (Prisma_fit, Siemens, Munich, Germany) scanner. Structural MRI images were obtained by 3D Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Gradient-Echo (MPRAGE) T1 weighted sequence and the following scanning parameters: acquisition plane: sagittal; acquisition type: 3D; coil: posterior-anterior (PA); field strength: 3.0 T; flip angle: 9.0 degrees; matrix X: 240.0 pixels; matrix Y: 256.0 pixels; matrix Z: 176.0; pixel spacing X: 1.1 mm; pixel spacing Y: 1.1 mm; pulse sequence: gradient recovery/inversion recovery (GR/IR); slice thickness: 1.2 mm; echo time (TE): 3.0 ms; inversion time (TI): 900.0 ms; repetition time (TR): 2300.0 ms; weighting: T1. DTI image data were obtained by echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence and the following scanning parameters: acquisition type: 2D; field strength: 3.0 T; flip angle; 90.0 degrees; gradient directions: 54.0; matrix X: 1044.0 pixels; matrix Y: 1044.0 pixels; matrix Z: 55.0; 7 b = 0 s/mm2 + 48 b = 1000 s/mm2 = 55 volumes, 7 images with b = 0 s/mm2 and 48 gradient directions with b = 1000 s/mm2; pixel size X: 2.0 mm; pixel size Y: 2.0 mm; pulse sequence: echo planar (EP); slices: 80; slice thickness: 2.0 mm; TE: 56.0 ms; TR: 7200.0 ms.

The preprocessing of DTI data included (1) converting DICOM files into NIfTI images; (2) using the bet command of FMRIB Software Library (FSL) to estimate the brain mask; (3) correcting for eddy current and motion artifact by using the flirt command of FSL to correct the eddy current induced distortion of diffusion weighted images (DWI) and simple head-motion during scanning by registering the DWI to the b0 image of first acquisition with an affine transformation, and then, according to the resultant affine transformations, rotating the gradient direction of each DWI volume [20]; (4) estimating diffusion tensor and calculating FA by applying the dtifit command of FSL to calculate diffusion tensor metrics by solving the Stejskal and Tanner equation [21], including FA; and (5) normalizing target and smooth by calling the fnirt command of FSL to match the FA images of native space to the FA template in the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space, using 6 mm for smoothing. PANDA software (Pipeline for Analysing Brain Diffusion Images, Beijing Normal University, http://www.nitrc.org/projects/panda/) [22] was used for preprocessing based on FMRIB Software Library (FSL 4.1.0, University of Oxford, https://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/).

2.3 Construction and Analysis of Brain Network
2.3.1 Define Network Nodes

We used the PANDA toolkit (https://www.nitrc.org/projects/panda/) to track white matter fibers in the DTI data with the fiber assignment by continuous tracking (FACT) algorithm and stipulated that the tracking would stop when the turned angle was greater than 45 degrees and FA was less than 0.2 [23]. The anatomical automatic labeling (AAL) 90 atlas [24] was selected as the brain region template. The whole brain was divided into 90 brain regions, each as a node of the brain network, and the edge of the brain network referred to the white matter fiber bundles connected between these nodes. In this process, the T1-weighted images of individuals were registered to standard space through non-linear registration using the PANDA toolkit, and the inverse transformation T-1 was obtained. T-1 was then applied to the selected atlas to obtain 90 brain regions based on the AAL 90 atlas. Finally, the brain network with these 90 brain regions as nodes was obtained.

2.3.2 Defining the Edge of the Network

We defined the network edges by a threshold of the fiber bundles. By empirically setting the threshold for the number of fiber connections (FN) between any two nodes to 3, we retain only those connections observed in at least 80% of the participants, which not only reduces false positive connections due to the limitations of deterministic fiber tracking but also aids in identifying the largest connected component within the network [25]. The FN and mean FA values of the connected fibers between two regions were defined as the weights of the network edges for the weighted networks. For an unweighted network, the edge of the network was defined as either 1, meaning the number of fiber bundles between two nodes exceeds a specified threshold and, hence, there is a connection between the two nodes, or 0, meaning the number of fiber bundles between two nodes is lower than the specified threshold and, hence, there is no connection between the two nodes. Deterministic fiber tracking generates three matrices: fiber number, average length, and average FA.

2.3.3 Topological Properties

Using the FA matrix obtained by PANDA software based on FSL, the topological properties were calculated by MATLAB-based GRETNA software (The Graph-theoretical Network Analysis Toolkit, https://www.nitrc.org). The whole-brain network characteristics were as follows: small-worldness (σ), global efficiency (Eg), local efficiency (Eloc), shortest path length (Lp), clustering coefficient (Cp), normalized Lp (λ), normalized Cp (γ), and assortativity. The intracerebral node characteristics were as follows: nodal local efficiency, nodal Cp, degree centrality, and betweenness centrality. For the definitions of topological properties and computations, refer to [26] and the Supplementary Material.

2.4 Statistical Analysis

SPSS 20.0 software (IBM Corporation, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis of demographic data and clinical characteristics. For continuous variables, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used first, and Bonferroni multiple comparison correction was then performed for significantly different variables. For binary variables, the chi-squared test was conducted, and Dunn multiple comparison correction was performed for significantly different variables, and p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. For network properties, the statistical analysis was performed by a one-way ANOVA F test and two-sample t-test in the Global and Nodal Metric Comparison module of GRETNA software [27], among the three groups with age and Aβ1-42 as covariates. First, ANOVA was used for the three groups of data, and then the significant results were analyzed by a two-sample t-test. The threshold was set to p < 0.05. Multiple comparison correction (Benjamini-Hochberg procedure) was performed.

3. Results
3.1 Demographic Data

The demographic and clinical characteristics of all study subjects are provided in Table 1, presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). No significant difference was observed among the three groups for sex, education level, MMSE, t-tau, or p-tau181. Compared to the APOEε4- group (71.98 ± 4.86 years) and HC group (75.03 ± 6.06 years), age was significantly lower in the APOEε4+ group (70.88 ± 5.27 years, p = 0.012). In CSF biomarkers, the APOEε4+ group (1079.09 ± 419.28 pg/mL, p = 0.012) had lower Aβ1-42 than APOEε4- group (1384.98 ± 353.23 pg/mL) and HC group (1338.20 ± 371.46 pg/mL). The values of Aβ1-42 and age, which exhibited significant differences, were incorporated as covariates.

Table 1.Participant demographics and clinical profiles.
HC group (n = 36) APOEε4- group (n = 33) APOEε4+ group (n = 21) F/χ2 p-value
Age (years) 75.03 ± 6.06 71.98 ± 4.86 70.88 ± 5.27 4.619a 0.012*
Gender (F/M) 15/21 20/13 13/8 0.400b 0.527
Education 16.72 ± 2.42 16.27 ± 2.90 16.86 ± 2.15 0.419a 0.659
MMSE 28.89 ± 1.39 28.94 ± 1.14 29.00 ± 1.30 0.050a 0.951
Aβ142 (pg/mL) 1338.20 ± 371.46 1384.98 ± 353.23 1079.09 ± 419.28 4.630a 0.012*
t-tau (pg/mL) 221.33 ± 86.64 213.90 ± 71.97 262.22 ± 107.69 2.158a 0.122
p-tau (pg/mL) 19.89 ± 8.94 18.89 ± 6.76 24.63 ± 11.80 2.818a 0.065

F, female; M, male; MMSE, Mini Mental State Examination; t-tau, total tau; p-tau, phosphorylated tau; Aβ1-42, β-amyloid protein 1–42. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference between the groups. aF value was obtained using the analysis of variance test. bχ2 value was obtained using the χ2 test. HC, healthy control; APOEε4, Apolipoprotein E4; SD, standard deviation.

3.2 Whole-Brain Network Characteristics

The σ was manifested in the network in all three groups (Table 2). The Cp in the APOEε4+ (0.2446 ± 0.4104) and APOEε4- groups (0.2502 ± 0.4174) was significantly lower than that in the HC group (0.2758 ± 0.4047) (Fig. 1A; p = 0.008). However, there were no significant differences in Lp, λ, γ, or σ among the three groups (Fig. 2). The APOEε4+ (0.2835 ± 0.5600) and APOEε4- groups (0.2934 ± 0.5499) had considerably lower Eloc than the HC group (0.3272 ± 0.5306) (Fig. 1B; p = 0.006). There were no differences among the groups in Eg, hierarchy, assortativity, or synchronization (Fig. 3).

Fig. 1.

Significant differences in Cp and Eloc between groups. (A) The clustering coefficient (Cp) was significantly decreased in the APOEε4- and APOEε4+ groups compared the HC group (p < 0.05). (B) The local efficiency (Eloc) was significantly decreased in the APOEε4- and APOEε4+ groups compared to the HC group (p < 0.05). The “***” symbol denotes statistical significance.

Fig. 2.

The global metrics of the brain connectome between the APOEε4+, APOEε4-, and HC groups. There were no significant differences among the three groups. (A) The global efficiencies of the APOEε4- and APOEε4+ groups were not significantly different compared to that of the HC group (p ˃ 0.05). (B) The hierarchies of the APOEε4- and APOEε4+ groups were not significantly different compared to that of the HC group (p ˃ 0.05). (C) The assortativity values of the APOEε4- and APOEε4+ groups were not significantly different compared to that of the HC group (p ˃ 0.05). (D) The synchronization results of the APOEε4- and APOEε4+ groups were not significantly different compared to that of the HC group (p ˃ 0.05).

Fig. 3.

Small-world parameters of the global cerebral between the APOEε4+, APOEε4-, and HC groups. There were no significant differences among the three groups. (A) The shortest path lengths (Lp) of the APOEε4- and APOEε4+ groups were not significantly different compared to that of the HC group (p ˃ 0.05). (B) The normalized characteristic path lengths (λ) of the APOEε4- and APOEε4+ groups were not significantly different compared to that of the HC group (p ˃ 0.05). (C) The small-worldness (σ) values of the APOEε4- and APOEε4+ groups were not significantly different compared to that of the HC group (p ˃ 0.05). (D) The normal clustering coefficients (γ) of the APOEε4- and APOEε4+ groups were not significantly different compared to that of the HC group (p ˃ 0.05).

Table 2.The differences in the global metrics of WM structural networks.
Global properties HC group APOEε4- group APOEε4+ group F value p value Intergroup comparison
Cp 0.2758 ± 0.4047 0.2502 ± 0.4174 0.2446 ± 0.4104 5.052 0.008* HC>APOEε4−/APOEε4+
Lp 4.5099 ± 1.4157 4.5486 ± 0.7962 4.4024 ± 0.4560 0.129 0.879
λ 1.2664 ± 0.5060 1.2507 ± 0.4336 1.2450 ± 0.3537 1.822 0.168
γ 8.8858 ± 0.9843 8.7868 ± 1.1409 8.7722 ± 0.8334 0.116 0.890
σ 7.0242 ± 0.7864 7.0197 ± 0.8265 7.0420 ± 0.5994 0.006 0.994
Eg 0.2338 ± 0.4057 0.2251 ± 0.3147 0.2294 ± 0.2273 0.572 0.567
Eloc 0.3272 ± 0.5306 0.2934 ± 0.5499 0.2835 ± 0.5600 5.386 0.006* HC>APOEε4−/APOEε4+
Hierarchy 1.2084 ± 0.1751 1.2711 ± 0.2335 1.3305 ± 0.2299 2.294 0.107
Assortativity −0.1592 ± 1.5122 0.0861 ± 0.9705 −0.0394 ± 1.2086 0.323 0.725
Synchronization −0.1592 ± 1.5122 0.0582 ± 0.7723 −0.0394 ± 1.2086 0.277 0.759

WM, white matter; Cp, clustering coefficient; Lp, shortest path length; λ, normalized characteristic path length; γ, normal clustering coefficients; σ, small-worldness; Eg, global efficiency; Eloc, local efficiency; ANOVA, analysis of variance. Group comparisons conducted using ANOVA (F values from variance analysis) and significant outcomes analyzed via two-sample t-tests. Benjamini-Hochberg procedure correction applied for multiple comparisons. Pairwise comparisons: HC>APOEε4-/APOEε4+ (e.g., HC>APOEε4-, Cp: t = 2.582, p = 0.012; Eloc: t = 2.599, p = 0.011; HC>APOEε4+, Cp: t = 2.793, p = 0.007; Eloc: t = 2.944, p = 0.005). Data presented as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05 denotes significant group differences.

3.3 Intracerebral Node Characteristics

When comparing the node characteristics in the structural networks of the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups with the HC group, the node Cp and the node Eloc in the left cuneate lobe were reduced in the APOEε4+ group and increased in the APOEε4- group. Moreover, the node Cp and node Eloc in the right cuneate lobe were increased in both the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups, with a more significant increase in the APOEε4- group. The node Cp and node Eloc in the left supplementary motor area and the left paracentral lobule were increased in both the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups, with a more significant increase in the APOEε4+ group (p < 0.05; Table 3). The centrality in bilateral cuneate lobes was increased in the APOEε4+ group and reduced in the APOEε4- group. The centrality in the right gyrus rectus, the right intraorbital superior frontal gyrus, the left paracentral lobule, the right supramarginal gyrus, and the right superior temporal gyrus was increased in the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups, with a more significant increase in the APOEε4- group. Furthermore, the centrality in the left middle temporal gyrus was increased in the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups, with a more significant increase in the APOEε4+ group (p < 0.05; Table 4). The betweenness centrality in the bilateral cuneate lobes, the right gyrus rectus, and the right superior occipital gyrus was increased in the APOEε4+ group and reduced in the APOEε4- group. Moreover, the betweenness centrality in the right middle occipital gyrus was reduced in both the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups, with a more significant reduction in the APOEε4- group. The betweenness centrality in the right caudate nucleus and right lingual gyrus was increased in both the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups, with a more significant increase in the APOEε4- group (p < 0.05; Table 5). The statistically significant nodes are shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Predominant nodes with significant differences in nodes graph metrics. Abbreviations: SMA.L, Supp_Motor_Area_L, Supplementary motor area, left; REC.R, Rectus_R, Gyrus rectus, right; ORBsupmed.R, Frontal_Mid_Orb_R, Superior frontal gyrus, medial orbital, right; CUN.L, Cuneus_L, Cuneus, left; CUN.R, Cuneus_R, Cuneus, right; SOG.R, Occipital_Sup_R, Superior occipital gyrus, right; MOG.R, Occipital_Mid_R, Middle occipital gyrus, right; SMG.R, SupraMarginal_R, Supramarginal gyrus, right; LING.R, Lingual_R, Lingual gyrus, right; PCL.L, Paracentral_Lobule_L, Paracentral lobule, left; CAU.R, Caudate_R, Caudate nucleus, right; STG.R, Temporal_Sup_R, Superior temporal gyrus, right; MTG.L, Temporal_Mid_L, Middle temporal gyrus, left.

Table 3.Brain regions with significant differences in nodal metrics.
AAL number Corresponding brain regions Anatomical classification Cp Eloc
p F p F
45 Cuneus_L Occipital 0.0019 6.7654 0.0007 7.9227
46 Cuneus_R Occipital 0.0090 4.9944 0.0030 6.2405
19 Supp_Motor_Area_L Frontal 0.0300 3.6610 0.0300 3.6610
69 Paracentral_Lobule_L Parietal 0.0343 3.5148 0.0343 3.5148

AAL, automated anatomical labeling; Cp, clustering coefficient; Eloc, local efficiency; L, Left; R, Right; Supp, Supplementary. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference between the groups. The F value was obtained using the analysis of variance test.

Table 4.Brain regions with significant degree centrality differences.
AAL number Corresponding brain regions Anatomical classification p F
45 Cuneus_L Occipital 0.0015 7.0803
28 Rectus_R Prefontal 0.0021 6.6544
82 Temporal_Sup_R Temporal 0.0162 4.3394
46 Cuneus_R Occipital 0.0172 4.2714
85 Temporal_Mid_L Temporal 0.0225 3.9771
26 Frontal_Mid_Orb_R Prefontal 0.0225 3.9742
69 Paracentral_Lobule_L Parietal 0.0261 3.8135
64 SupraMarginal_R Parietal 0.0294 3.6829

AAL, automated anatomical labeling. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference between the groups. The F value was obtained using the analysis of variance test.

Table 5.Brain regions with significant betweenness centrality differences.
AAL number Corresponding brain regions Anatomical classification p F
46 Cuneus_R Occipital 0.0068 5.3126
45 Cuneus_L Occipital 0.0082 5.0902
52 Occipital_Mid_R Occipital 0.0210 4.0519
50 Occipital_Sup_R Occipital 0.0276 3.7512
28 Rectus_R Prefontal 0.0349 3.4969
72 Caudate_R Subcortical 0.0436 3.2560
48 Lingual_R Occipital 0.0486 3.1386

AAL, automated anatomical labeling. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference between the groups. The F value was obtained using the analysis of variance test.

4. Discussion

In this study, we used graph theory to study whole-brain network characteristics and intracerebral node characteristics in the structural network in APOEε4+, APOEε4-, and HC groups. Our results showed that the three groups presented with small worldness and had statistically significant differences in Cp, Eloc, and local node properties in some brain regions, including the default mode network (DMN), occipital lobe, temporal lobe, and subcortical regions. Moreover, different intracerebral node characteristics were observed between the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups.

In all three groups, the brain structural network had high Cp (γ > 1) and close Lp (λ 1), with the characteristics of a small-world network. The Cp and Eloc in APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups were significantly lower than those in the HC group. However, no statistical difference was observed between the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups. Cp measures the local information integration capability of the network and reflects local efficiency. Brier et al. [28] found that the Cp changed with the progression of the disease and was associated with the known cognitive impairment in AD patients. Daianu et al. [29] and Lo et al. [30] demonstrated higher Lp and lower Eg in the structural network of patients with AD. This study showed the reduction of only Cp and Eloc, with no changes in Lp or Eg, which further indicated that SCD included mild neuron injury. However, there existed compensation in the structural network; thus, the global efficiency of the whole structural network was not significantly changed.

This study identified significant changes in node Cp and node Eloc in some brain regions of the structural network in both APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups, mainly including the bilateral cuneate lobes, the left supplementary motor area, and the left paracentral lobule. The bilateral cuneiform lobes are located on the medial side of the occipital lobe and form a primary visual area between the spur sulcus and the parietal-occipital sulcus and the surrounding cortex [24]. The left supplementary motor area is located on the medial side of the left frontal lobe. Cona and Semenza [31] found that the supplementary motor area involves perceptual and productive tasks (e.g., time/language/music perception and production) but has no association with the information to be processed (e.g., spatial working memory and linguistic working memory). The left paracenter lobule is located in the parietal lobe and belongs to the DMN. The DMN includes a wide range of the frontal lobe and the posterior midline and inferior parietal lobule. It is not a single network but rather consists of multiple parallel intersecting networks [32]. Furthermore, it performs functional activities in the human brain at rest, including those related to emotional processing, self-introspection, and episodic memory extraction [33]. Hahn et al. [34] found that the DMN of patients with AD was subject to selective and gradual damage. Previous studies on DMN changes of SCD mainly focused on the resting state functional MRI, and only a few studies have been performed on the white matter structural network. However, Horn et al. [35] observed a high similarity between functional and structural connectivity in the DMN region. In studies on resting state functional MRI, Verfaillie et al. [36] and Hafkemeijer et al. [37] showed that the functional connectivity in the DMN of individuals with SCD was increased; however, Wang et al. [38] and Dillen et al. [39] observed less functional connectivity in the DMN of individuals with SCD. The heterogeneity of functional connectivity in the DMN may be associated with compensation and its degree in individuals with SCD. In a study on the white matter structural network, Shu et al. [40] noted lower local node efficiency in the paracentral lobule. Moreover, Ye et al. [41] studied the abnormal connection mode in the structural network using multivariable distance matrix regression and found that the supplementary motor area was abnormal in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), whereas the DMN was abnormal in patients with AD. The results of the present study indicated that individuals with SCD had similar changes to those with MCI and AD, and there were differences between the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups. These findings suggest that functional integration and separation are damaged in the structural network at the SCD stage [42], and the structural network is affected by APOEε4.

Degree centrality was significantly changed in the DMN, occipital lobe, and temporal lobe in both the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups. Node centrality is the number of edges shared by a node and other nodes in the network, and it used to measure the importance of a single node in the network. Brain regions with any change in DMN centrality included the right gyrus rectus, the right intraorbital superior frontal gyrus, the left paracentral lobule, and the right supramarginal gyrus, in agreement with previous studies [41, 43]. Moreover, the brain regions with temporal lobe changes included the right superior temporal gyrus and left middle temporal gyrus. The right superior temporal gyrus involves language processing, connects auditory and visual pathways [44], and is sensitive to emotional information [45]. The left middle temporal gyrus plays a role in the process of memory. Brascamp et al. [46] stimulated the middle temporal gyrus cortex using transcranial magnetic stimulation and found that it was associated with the disruption of memory trace, suggesting that abnormalities of the middle temporal gyrus may result in lower memory confidence. The present study also found that changes in the internal structural network in the DMN and temporal lobe were different between the APOEε4+ group and the APOEε4- group, which may be associated with the different compensatory pathways of the two groups after structural network destruction.

Betweenness centrality was significantly changed in the occipital lobe, DMN, and basal ganglia between the APOEε4+ group and the APOEε4- group. Betweenness centrality is the number of shortest paths cutting through this node among all other pairs in the whole network, and it reflects the node’s importance in the network. The DMN region includes the right gyrus rectus. The betweenness centrality in the DMN region was increased in the APOEε4+ group and reduced in the APOEε4- group. These different results observed in the two SCD groups explain the findings of previous studies [47, 48, 49]. The reasons for the heterogeneity in the DMN region are associated with the division of study subjects and their inclusion criteria. The occipital lobe includes the bilateral cuneate lobes, the right middle occipital gyrus, the right superior occipital gyrus, and the right lingual gyrus. The betweenness centrality in the right superior occipital gyrus was increased in the APOEε4+ group and reduced in the APOEε4- group. The betweenness centrality in the right middle occipital gyrus was reduced in both the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups, with a more significant reduction in the APOEε4- group. Moreover, the betweenness centrality in the right lingual gyrus was increased in both the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups, with a more significant increase in the APOEε4- group. Hayes et al. [50] identified fewer occipital cortex activities in memory coding. However, Viviano et al. [15] found no significant difference in the occipital lobe. The caudate nucleus is closely related to repetitive stereotyped behaviors and is a component of the cortical–striatal–thalamocortical neural circuit [51]. In the present study, the betweenness centrality in the right caudate nucleus increased in both the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups, with a more significant increase in the APOEε4- group. The different node characteristics of the two groups of individuals with SCD may be related to different degrees of compensation generated to achieve network balance after an early injury.

APOE is the main lipid carrier of the central nervous system, and APOEε4 is the most potent genetic risk factor for sporadic AD [52]. APOEε4 affects not only the clearance and aggregation of Aβ but also neuron growth, membrane repair and remodeling, and synaptogenesis and neuroinflammation [53]. The present study found that the structural network was different between the APOEε4+ and APOEε4- groups, indicating that APOEε4 had an impact on the structural network, although the specific mechanism requires further research.

Based on the preliminary nature of this study, the following limitations should be considered. First, the sample size was small. Although the ADNI database contains a large amount of data, there were few individuals with SCD with T1-weighted images, DTI, and APOEε4, which may weaken the statistical power of this study. Second, this study is a cross-sectional study without clinical follow-up. By expanding the sample size and using a more diverse range of cognitive assessment tools in longitudinal follow-up studies, future research may reveal meaningful associations that we have not been able to observe at present. Third, to study the mechanism of the effect of APOEε4 on the white matter network, future studies should be performed with live animal models, supplemented by molecular imaging and molecular biological data for confirmation. Fourth, the original version of the AAL atlas [17] was selected. Nevertheless, the latest version of AAL3 [54] adds many previously undefined areas of the brain that are interested in many neuroimaging studies, such as a new version of anterior cingulate, thalamus, and brain nuclei (nucleus accumbens, substantia nigra, ventral tegmental area, red nucleus, locus coeruleus, and raphe nuclei). AAL3 can be used as a toolkit for statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and with MRIcron. AAL3 has an isotropic voxel size of 2 × 2 × 2 mm. In addition, the voxel sampling size of 1 × 1 × 1 mm is provided. The AAL3 atlas should be selected for future studies. Additionally, while we have implemented measures to alleviate the impact of connection density, such as empirically selecting a threshold for fiber connections and retaining only those observed in at least 80% of participants, we have not directly analyzed the implications of variations in connection density on the results. Future research could delve deeper into investigating the impact of connection density on topological property analysis and employ a more comprehensive approach to address this factor. Finally, based on the DTI, we constructed a structural network instead of a resting state functional network. Future studies should further combine structural and functional networks for multimodal MRI studies and further explore the effects of APOEε4 on the brain functional networks of individuals with SCD in multimodal MRI.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the DTI of individuals with SCD showed structural connection changes in the DMN, the occipital lobe, the temporal lobe, and subcortical regions. APOEε4 affects the structural network, but its mechanism should be further studied. In practice, clinicians can use DTI as a detection indicator to identify individuals with SCD.

Availability of Data and Materials

All raw data used in this study were from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the ADNI database (http://adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf.

Author Contributions

These should be presented as follows: SD and WL designed the research study. SD and WC performed the research. SF and HL provided help on analyzing the data. SD and WL wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The ADNI passed a review by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), and all subjects provided written informed consent and unified inclusion criteria (https://adni.loni.usc.edu/). We obtained the approval of our local ethics review committee (Dongguan Eighth People’s Hospital medical ethics committee AF/SC-15/01.0) before the analysis began.

Acknowledgment

We thank LetPub (https://www.letpub.com) for linguistic assistance.

Funding

This research was funded by Guangdong Medical Science and Technology Research Fund, grant number 20231129323888.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.