Abstract

Background:

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are a complex and widespread problem among women, resulting in serious problems in both physical, mental, and social health and occupational activity.

Methods:

A self-administered survey questionnaire was conducted among 100 women diagnosed with LUTS via Google Forms. Among other things, the level of knowledge and self-assessment of existing knowledge about the condition among affected women and the preventive activities undertaken were assessed.

Results:

The respondents' level of knowledge varied widely. The average score reached was 66.67% (64.48 ± 24.63%). The study demonstrated that women under 35 years of age (U = 772.5; p = 0.005) and those with higher education (U = 615.5; p < 0.001) had significantly higher levels of knowledge.

Conclusions:

Women's age and education affect knowledge of incontinence prevention. The common occurrence of lower urinary tract symptoms requires the development of a system of preventive, educational and therapeutic activities. Multilevel cooperation is important to increase the effectiveness of therapy.

1. Introduction

In women, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are common in urogynecological practice [1]. This condition involves involuntary urination that can be objectively detected, leading to hygiene issues and posing challenges in social interactions [2]. Among women, there are three basic types of nonneurogenic LUTS: stress urinary incontinence (SUI), overactive bladder (OAB), and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) [1]. SUI refers to the involuntary leakage of urine during activities like sneezing, coughing, physical exertion, or sudden changes in body position, without direct pressure on the bladder [3, 4]. OAB is characterized by a feeling of strong, sometimes uncontrollable urge to urinate, accompanied by a sense of urgency, even immediately or soon after using the toilet.

This condition can also lead to nocturnal incontinence (known as nocturia). Nocturia is the complaint that the individual has to wake at night one or more times for voiding [5]. MUI is a combination of stress and urgency incontinence, resulting in leakage during both physical exertion and bladder pressure [1].

LUTS stands out as one of the most serious global health issues in the 21st century and ranks among the most prevalent chronic conditions affecting women [6]. The exact prevalence of LUTS is difficult to determine because a large proportion of patients do not disclose their complaints, considering them embarrassing symptoms and, above all, a natural sign of aging [7], since both the prevalence and severity of incontinence problems increase with age [6] and is associated with high financial, social, and emotional costs [8]. Studies conducted in developed countries have revealed that about 200 million people suffer from LUTS, of which about 10–25% of women after the age of 30 have periodic symptoms of incontinence, while among women over the age of 50, this number increases to about 1/3 [9, 10].

Due to the above, people suffering from incontinence frequently withdraw from social and professional life [9]. These challenges impact not only the patients themselves, who are dealing with incontinence symptoms but also their families and the immediate environment. The basis for undertaking proper treatment lies in diagnosing the type of LUTS, and the goal of treatment, regardless of the type of incontinence, is certainly to improve quality of life. The collaboration among a medical specialist, a psychologist, and the cooperation of the patient, including their family, enhances the effectiveness of therapy. Uncontrolled urinary leakage, given its widespread prevalence in the community, takes on the characteristics of a disease that necessitates establishing a system of preventive, educational, and therapeutic measures [9, 11]. The purpose of this study was to assess knowledge subjectively, compare knowledge resources, and evaluate health-promoting behaviors related to LUTS in women.

2. Materials and Methods

The research was carried out among women diagnosed with LUTS. An original questionnaire (was not validated), from September 2022 to March 2023, developed through an online Google Forms survey, was utilized as the research instrument and distributed through social networks and support groups for verified women facing LUTS. Participation in the survey was voluntary and anonymous, conducted via an online platform. The study was conducted among 100 female respondents, each with a different age, education level, marital status, and place of residence. Factors such as diuretic usage, past births, and comorbidities were important considerations in the survey. Inclusion criteria were female gender and a diagnosis of LUTS. Exclusion criteria were male gender.

A questionnaire consisting of 27 questions was created to conduct this study. The first four questions gathered information about the women’s age, education, marital status, and place of residence. Subsequent questions focused on comorbidities, diuretic use, occupation, and the occurrence of incontinence symptoms. The next questions assessed women’s knowledge of incontinence, for example, the number of acceptable micturitions per day, the number of acceptable micturitions per night, risk factors for urinary incontinence (UI), the least invasive method of treating UI, and incontinence prevention methods. The final question assessed women’s knowledge of incontinence (self-evaluation): how do you rate your knowledge about UI?

Based on the questionnaire responses about women’s incontinence knowledge, the subjects’ knowledge was verified and evaluated using an assessment scale as outlined in Table 1.

Table 1. Knowledge rating scale.
Rate Sum of points [%]
Very low 0–6 <30
Low 7–10 30–49.9
Moderate 11–14 50–69.9
High 15–17 70–84.9
Very high 18–21 >85

For data analysis, we used TIBCO Software Inc. (2017), Statistica (data analysis software system), version 13, and Microsoft Excel (version 2019) from Microsoft Office (Redmond, WA, USA). The distribution of variables was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for comparisons between groups. Comparisons between the assessment results and self-assessment of knowledge were conducted using the Wilcoxon paired rank order test. Spearman’s R test and the χ2 NW (highest reliability) test were used to examine relationships between variables. The significance level in all calculations was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

The study was conducted in a group of 100 women, aged 18–68 years, with an average body mass index (BMI) of 25.69 ± 4.89 kg/m2 (ranging from 17.63 to 40.26 kg/m2). Among the study group, the following diseases were present: respiratory and pulmonary diseases in 5% of the respondents, renal and urinary diseases in 7%, gastrointestinal diseases in 9%, metabolic diseases in 19%, thyroid diseases in 31%, and cardiovascular diseases in 22% (with no additional diseases observed in 40% of the study population). Diuretic usage was reported by 20% of the women, while 30% used incontinence prophylaxis in their daily lives. The characteristics of the study group are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Characteristics of the study group.
n = 100 (%)
Age 18–25 years 15 (%)
26–35 years 22 (%)
36–45 years 25 (%)
46–60 years 26 (%)
>60 years 12 (%)
Education Primary 2 (%)
Vocational 16 (%)
Secondary 31 (%)
Higher 51 (%)
Place of residence Rural 25 (%)
City <50 thousands 23 (%)
City 50–100 thousands 13 (%)
City 100–250 thousands 8 (%)
City >250 thousands 31 (%)
Marital status Widow 10 (%)
Married 59 (%)
Single 31 (%)
Professional activity Nonworking 18 (%)
Physical work 21 (%)
Mixed work 33 (%)
Mental work 28 (%)
BMI (kg/m2) Underweight (BMI <18.49 kg/m2) 2 (%)
Proper BMI (BMI 18.5–24.99 kg/m2) 45 (%)
Overweight (BMI 25.0–29.99 kg/m2) 38 (%)
Class 1 obesity (BMI 30.0–34.99 kg/m2) 8 (%)
Class 2 obesity (BMI 35.0–39.99 kg/m2) 6 (%)
Class 3 obesity (BMI 40.0 kg/m2) 1 (%)
Manner of delivery Instrumental vaginal delivery 14 (%)
Spontaneous vaginal delivery 62 (%)
Caesarean section 24 (%)

BMI, body mass index.

3.1 Urinary Incontinence

Uncontrolled urine leakage during exercise, coughing, or sneezing was experienced by 73% of respondents, during intercourse by 31%, and in other situations by 22% of respondents (Table 3).

Table 3. Incidence of urinary incontinence.
n = 100 (%)
Uncontrolled urine leakage during exercise, coughing, or sneezing Yes 41 (%)
Occasionally 32 (%)
No 27 (%)
Uncontrolled urine leakage at rest Yes 6 (%)
Occasionally 16 (%)
No 78 (%)
Uncontrolled urine leakage during intercourse Yes 13 (%)
Occasionally 18 (%)
No 69 (%)
Number of nocturnal micturitions >5 times/night 7 (%)
Between 3 and 4/night 24 (%)
2 times/night 69 (%)
Associated symptoms Vaginal bulge 6 (%)
Painful intercourse 10 (%)
Lower abdominal and low back pain 17 (%)
Feeling of incomplete bowel movement 22 (%)
Urinary urgency 32 (%)
Not applicable 44 (%)

Women aged over 36 (χ2 = 10.64; p = 0.004) and those with chronic diseases (χ2 = 10.22; p = 0.006) were significantly more likely to report the occurrence of uncontrolled urine leakage during exercise, coughing, or sneezing. In contrast, female respondents with a lower level of education (χ2 = 9.58; p = 0.010) and chronic diseases (χ2 = 11.23; p = 0.004) were significantly more likely to report the occurrence of uncontrolled urine leakage during rest. Uncontrolled urine leakage during intercourse was significantly more often declared by women with lower levels of education (χ2 = 8.58; p = 0.019) and those with chronic diseases (χ2 = 9.11; p = 0.010). In addition, women with a lower level of education (χ2 = 12.45; df = 2; p = 0.002), those with excessive body weight (χ2 = 10.8; df = 2; p = 0.005), and those with chronic diseases (χ2 = 8.96; df = 2; p = 0.011)were characterized by a significantly higher number of nocturnal micturitions per night (Table 4).

Table 4. Uncontrolled urine leakage.
Uncontrolled urine leakage during exercise, coughing, or sneezing Age
35 years old 36 years old
No 17 (45.95%) 10 (15.87%)
Occasionally 8 (21.62%) 24 (38.10%)
Yes 12 (32.43%) 29 (46.03%)
Chi2 χ2 = 10.64; df = 2; p = 0.004
Chronic diseases
Yes No
No 10 (16.67%) 17 (42.50%)
Occasionally 19 (31.67%) 13 (32.50%)
Yes 31 (51.67%) 10 (25.00%)
Chi2 χ2 = 10.22; df = 2; p = 0.006
Uncontrolled urine leakage at rest Level of education
Higher Other
No 46 (90.20%) 32 (65.31%)
Occasionally 4 (7.84%) 12 (24.49%)
Yes 1 (1.96%) 5 (10.20%)
Chi2 χ2 = 9.58; df = 2; p = 0.010
Chronic diseases
Yes No
No 41 (68.33%) 37 (92.50%)
Occasionally 13 (21.67%) 3 (7.50%)
Yes 6 (10.00%) 0 (0.00%)
Chi2 χ2 = 11.23; df = 2; p = 0.004
Uncontrolled urine leakage during intercourse Level of education
Higher Other
No 40 (78.43%) 29 (59.18%)
Occasionally 9 (17.65%) 9 (18.37%)
Yes 2 (3.92%) 11 (22.45%)
Chi2 χ2 = 8.58; df = 2; p = 0.019
Chronic diseases
Yes No
No 36 (60.00%) 33 (82.50%)
Occasionally 12 (20.00%) 6 (15.00%)
Yes 12 (20.00%) 1 (2.50%)
Chi2 χ2 = 9.11; df = 2; p = 0.010
Number of nocturnal micturitions per night Level of education
Higher Other
2 times 43 (84.31%) 26 (53.06%)
3–4 times 7 (13.73%) 17 (34.69%)
>5 times 1 (1.96%) 6 (12.24%)
Chi2 χ2 = 12.45; df = 2; p = 0.002
Body weight
Normal BMI Abnorma BMI
2 times 38 (84.44%) 29 (54.72%)
3–4 times 6 (13.33%) 18 (33.96%)
>5 times 1 (2.22%) 6 (11.32%)
Chi2 χ2 = 10.8; df = 2; p = 0.005
Chronic diseases
Yes No
2 times 35 (58.33%) 34 (85.00%)
3–4 times 20 (33.33%) 4 (10.00%)
>5 times 5 (8.33%) 2 (5.00%)
Chi2 χ2 = 8.96; df = 2; p = 0.011

BMI, body mass index.

3.2 Knowledge of Urinary Incontinence

The individual distribution regarding respondents’ knowledge is shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Distribution of respondents’ knowledge.
n = 100 (%)
Number of acceptable micturitions per day <6 35 (%)
6–8 47 (%)
>8 18 (%)
Number of acceptable micturitions per night 0–1 0 (%)
2 88 (%)
3–4 11 (%)
>5 1 (%)
Risk factors for urinary incontinence Reproductive organ surgery 71 (%)
Age 73 (%)
Physical work 73 (%)
Obesity 74 (%)
Pregnancies and deliveries 86 (%)
The least invasive method of treating urinary incontinence TOT/TVT surgical treatment 4 (%)
Periocervical collagen injection 7 (%)
Do not know 31 (%)
Exercising the pelvic floor muscles 58 (%)
Incontinence prevention methods Urinating prophylactically (in reserve, just in case) 13 (%)
Drinking less 14 (%)
Withholding urine stream during micturition 33 (%)
Avoiding constipation 45 (%)
Maintaining a healthy body weight 49 (%)

TOT, transobturator tape; TVT, tension-free vaginal tape.

Respondents under 35 years of age were significantly more likely to indicate that genital surgery could be a risk factor for incontinence (χ2 = 4.94; p = 0.030), and women with higher education were significantly more likely to indicate that age (χ2 = 4.68; p = 0.030), obesity (χ2 = 5.86; p = 0.020), and pelvic organ surgery (χ2 = 12.22; p < 0.001) were risk factors for UI. Female respondents living in cities >50,000 residents were also significantly more likely to indicate that obesity (χ2 = 4.30; p = 0.040) is a risk factor for incontinence (Table 6).

Table 6. Knowledge of urinary incontinence — part 1.
Age χ2 p
35 years old, N = 37 36 years old, N = 63
Pregnancies and deliveries 34 (91.89%) 52 (82.54%) 1.82 0.180
Physical work 30 (81.08%) 43 (68.25%) 2.02 0.160
Age 31 (83.78%) 42 (66.67%) 3.65 0.060
Obesity 31 (83.78%) 43 (68.25%) 3.07 0.080
Pelvic organ surgery 31 (83.78%) 40 (63.49%) 4.94 0.030
Level of education χ2 p
Higher, N = 51 Other, N = 49
Pregnancies and deliveries 47 (92.16%) 39 (79.59%) 3.36 0.070
Physical work 41 (80.39%) 32 (65.31%) 2.91 0.090
Age 42 (82.35%) 31 (63.27%) 4.68 0.030
Obesity 43 (84.31%) 31 (63.27%) 5.86 0.020
Pelvic organ surgery 44 (86.27%) 27 (55.1%) 12.22 <0.001
Place of residence χ2 p
Rural and city <50 thousands, N = 48 City ¿50 thousands, N = 52
Pregnancies and deliveries 41 (85.42%) 45 (86.54%) 0.03 0.870
Physical work 36 (75.00%) 37 (71.15%) 0.19 0.660
Age 31 (64.58%) 42 (80.77%) 3.34 0.070
Obesity 31 (64.58%) 43 (82.69%) 4.30 0.040
Pelvic organ surgery 32 (66.67%) 39 (75.00%) 0.84 0.360

According to female respondents under the age of 35, methods of preventing incontinence include avoiding constipation (χ2 = 7.03; p = 0.010), while older respondents indicated holding the urine stream during micturition (χ2 = 7.99; p = 0.005). In contrast, women with higher education indicated that avoiding constipation (χ2 = 16.85; p < 0.001) and maintaining a healthy body weight (χ2 = 7.98; p = 0.005) were forms of UI prevention, while others indicated that drinking less (χ2 = 5.99; p = 0.010) was a method of prevention. Women living in cities of >50,000 residents (χ2 = 4.93; p = 0.030) were significantly more likely to indicate that maintaining a healthy body weight was important in UI prevention. According to married women, holding the urine stream during micturition is an important preventive measure (χ2 = 5.03; p = 0.020), and among overweight women, drinking less (χ2 = 7.32; p = 0.010) was indicated (Table 7).

Table 7. Knowledge of urinary incontinence — part 2.
Age χ2 p
35 years old, N = 37 36 years old, N = 63
Avoiding constipation 23 (62.16%) 22 (34.92%) 7.03 0.010
Urinating prophylactically (in reserve, just in case) 4 (10.81%) 9 (14.29%) 0.25 0.610
Maintaining a healthy body weight 21 (56.76%) 28 (44.44%) 1.42 0.230
Withholding urine stream during micturition 6 (16.22%) 27 (42.86%) 7.99 0.005
Drinking less 5 (13.51%) 9 (14.29%) 0.01 0.910
Level of education χ2 p
Higher, N = 51 Other, N = 49
Avoiding constipation 33 (64.71%) 12 (24.49%) 16.85 <0.001
Urinating prophylactically (in reserve, just in case) 6 (11.76%) 7 (14.29%) 0.14 0.710
Maintaining a healthy body weight 32 (62.75%) 17 (34.69%) 7.98 0.005
Withholding urine stream during micturition 15 (29.41%) 18 (36.73%) 0.61 0.440
Drinking less 3 (5.88%) 11 (22.45%) 5.99 0.010
Place of residence χ2 p
Rural and city <50 thousands, N = 48 City >50 thousands, N = 52
Avoiding constipation 23 (47.92%) 22 (42.31%) 0.32 0.570
Urinating prophylactically (in reserve, just in case) 8 (16.67%) 5 (9.62%) 1.1 0.290
Maintaining a healthy body weight 18 (37.5%) 31 (59.62%) 4.93 0.030
Withholding urine stream during micturition 17 (35.42%) 16 (30.77%) 0.24 0.620
Drinking less 7 (14.58%) 7 (13.46%) 0.03 0.870
Marital status χ2 p
Single, N = 31 Married, N = 59
Avoiding constipation 17 (54.84%) 27 (45.76%) 0.67 0.410
Urinating prophylactically (in reserve, just in case) 2 (6.45%) 8 (13.56%) 1.13 0.290
Maintaining a healthy body weight 16 (51.61%) 29 (49.15%) 0.05 0.820
Withholding urine stream during micturition 6 (19.35%) 25 (42.37%) 5.03 0.020
Drinking less 5 (16.13%) 8 (13.56%) 0.11 0.740
Body weight χ2 p
Normal BMI, N = 45 Abnormal BMI, N = 53
Avoiding constipation 20 (44.44%) 24 (45.28%) 0.01 0.930
Urinating prophylactically (in reserve, just in case) 4 (8.89%) 9 (16.98%) 1.43 0.230
Maintaining a healthy body weight 24 (53.33%) 25 (47.17%) 0.37 0.540
Withholding urine stream during micturition 18 (40%) 14 (26.42%) 2.04 0.150
Drinking less 2 (4.44%) 12 (22.64%) 7.32 0.010
3.3 Assessment of Knowledge of Urinary Incontinence

The knowledge of the female respondents ranged from 14.29% to 100% (Fig. 1). The average score in the study group was 66.67% (64.48 ± 24.63%). The study demonstrated that women under 35 years of age (U = 772.5; p = 0.005) and those with higher education (U = 615.5; p < 0.001) had significantly higher levels of knowledge. In the study, there was no correlation between the place of residence, marital status, body weight assessment, chronic diseases, the prevalence of use of incontinence prevention in daily life, and the level of knowledge (Table 8).

Fig. 1.

Comparison of assessment and self-evaluation of knowledge.

Table 8. Knowledge assessment.
Mean ± SD Min–Max Me [Q1–Q3] U p
Age
<35 years 73.49 ± 21.84 19.05–100 76.19 [61.90–90.48] 772.5 0.005
>36 years 59.18 ± 24.8 14.29–100 57.14 [38.10–80.95]
Education
Higher 74.6 ± 23.03 19.05–100 80.95 [61.90–95.24] 615.5 <0.001
Other 53.94 ± 21.83 14.29–100 52.38 [38.10–76.19]
Place of residence
Rural or city <50 thousands 60.22 ± 25.3 14.29–100 61.9 [38.10–83.33] 1021.5 0.120
city >50 thousands 68.41 ± 23.56 23.81–100 76.19 [50.00–88.10]
Marital status
Single 69.74 ± 23.83 14.29–100 76.19 [52.38–90.48] 796.5 0.320
Marries 64.57 ± 24.38 19.05–100 66.67 [38.10–85.71]
Body weight
Normal 68.99 ± 25.27 19.05–100 76.19 [52.38–85.71] 965.0 0.100
Excessive 61.1 ± 24.06 14.29–95.24 57.14 [38.10–80.95]
Chronic diseases
Yes 62.22 ± 24.95 19.05–100 61.9 [40.48–85.71] 1041.0 0.260
No 67.86 ± 24.06 14.29–100 76.19 [45.24–85.71]
Prevention
Yes 70.63 ± 21.77 23.81–100 73.81 [57.14–90.48] 837.5 0.110
No 61.84 ± 25.45 14.29–100 61.9 [38.10–80.95]

SD, standard deviation.

3.4 Comparison of Assessment and Self-Evaluation of Incontinence Knowledge

Based on the questionnaire responses, a comparison was made between the assessment/real knowledge and self-evaluation about UI. Significant differences between the assessment and self-evaluation of knowledge were observed in the study (p < 0.001). The study observed that women with higher education showed a significantly higher assessment of knowledge. Women living in cities with over 50,000 residents displayed significantly higher self-evaluation scores, although no significant relationship was found between place of residence and knowledge assessment. Likewise, women using incontinence prophylaxis exhibited significantly higher self-evaluation scores, yet no significant association was found between prophylaxis use and knowledge assessment (Table 9, Fig. 1).

Table 9. Comparison of assessment and self-evaluation of knowledge.
The rating scale Education
Higher Other
Rate in the knowledge rating scale Very low 3 (5.88%) 8 (16.33%)
Low 6 (11.76%) 14 (28.57%)
Moderate 9 (17.65%) 12 (24.49%)
High 9 (17.65%) 11 (22.45%)
Very high 24 (47.06%) 4 (8.16%)
Chi2 Persona χ2 = 22.09; df = 4; p < 0.001
Rate in the self-evaluation rating scale Very low 2 (3.92%) 4 (8.16%)
Low 15 (29.41%) 16 (32.65%)
Moderate 10 (19.61%) 16 (32.65%)
High 16 (31.37%) 11 (22.45%)
Very high 8 (15.69%) 2 (4.08%)
Chi2 Persona χ2 = 6.86; df = 4; p = 0.144
Place of residence
Rural or city <50 thousand City >50 thousand
Rate in the knowledge rating scale Very low 7 (14.58%) 4 (7.69%)
Low 11 (22.92%) 9 (17.31%)
Moderate 11 (22.92%) 10 (19.23%)
High 7 (14.58%) 13 (25.00%)
Very high 12 (25.00%) 16 (30.77%)
Chi2 Persona χ2 = 3.32; df = 4; p = 0.512
Rate in the self-evaluation rating scale Very low 4 (8.33%) 2 (3.85%)
Low 18 (37.50%) 13 (25.00%)
Moderate 18 (37.50%) 8 (15.38%)
High 5 (10.42%) 22 (42.31%)
Very high 3 (6.25%) 7 (13.46%)
Chi2 Persona χ2 = 18.48; df = 4; p = 0.001
Prevention of urinary incontinence
Yes No
Rate in the knowledge rating scale Very low 1 (3.33%) 10 (14.29%)
Low 5 (16.67%) 15 (21.43%)
Moderate 8 (26.67%) 13 (18.57%)
High 5 (16.67%) 15 (21.43%)
Very high 11 (36.67%) 17 (24.29%)
Chi2 Persona χ2 = 5.05; df = 4; p = 0.282
Rate in the self-evaluation rating scale Very low 0 (0.00%) 6 (8.57%)
Low 3 (10.00%) 28 (40.00%)
Moderate 9 (30.00%) 17 (24.29%)
High 12 (40.00%) 15 (21.43%)
Very high 6 (20.00%) 4 (5.71%)
Chi2 Persona χ2 = 18.36; df = 4; p = 0.001
4. Discussion

UI is indeed becoming increasingly common in today’s medical landscape, particularly within urogynecology. It stems, in part, from a decline in female sex hormones, causing changes in the bladder and vagina, and the extinction of ovarian function [12, 13, 14]. Besides age, several factors contribute to the predisposition to UI, including overweight (obesity), smoking, multiple pregnancies, lack of exercise, carrying heavy objects, prior gynecological procedures, menopause, dynamic natural childbirth, delivering newborns with high birth weight, and genetic conditions [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15].

The incidence of LUTS in women rises with age and the number of deliveries, increasing from 19% in those under 45 years to 29% in women aged 80 years and older [16]. The literature provides limited coverage of incontinence prevention. The results of this study allow us to assess women’s knowledge levels and their practical application in everyday life regarding incontinence prevention. In our study, 15% of women between the ages of 18 and 25 have already experienced UI. A sedentary lifestyle and inactivity weakens the pelvic floor muscles. Inadequate and excessively strenuous training may also overload it. Athletic women often experience heightened strain on pelvic floor muscles, leading to SUI, although the exact mechanisms behind these relationships are not yet fully understood [17]. The largest group in the study comprised respondents aged 46–60, accounting for 26% of the respondents. Interestingly, the study shows that place of residence and education indeed influence a higher percentage of women with the disease in question. This is likely due to better access to doctors and higher detection rates compared to women in smaller cities or rural areas. Among the mentioned methods of pregnancy termination, women most commonly underwent natural childbirth with protection (protection of the perineum by the midwife) or a perineal incision. Unfortunately, poorly conducted deliveries and lack of postpartum prophylaxis, including consultation with at least a urogynecological physiotherapist, as observed, have a significant impact on the appearance of LUTS later on. Urogynecological physiotherapy has proven effectiveness in treating SUI [18]. In surgical treatment of SUI, suburethral taping confirms the safety and efficacy of the method, both in short-term and long-term follow-ups, with a success rate exceeding 80% [19]. Ultrasound is feasible, reliable, and minimally invasive to explore the pathophysiology of UI [20]. The choice of the method between “retropubic” vs. “transobturator” surgeries depended on a preoperative ultrasound examination of the pelvic floor and by taking into account the mobility of the urethra and the height of the periurethral furrow-vaginal vaults. The role of ultrasonographic measurement of bladder and detrusor wall thickness could be an important step in diagnosis of UI [21].

In addition, the study demonstrated that women with chronic diseases were significantly more likely to declare the occurrence of uncontrolled urine leakage during exercise, coughing, or sneezing. The symptoms reported by female respondents included painful intercourse in 10% of respondents, lower abdominal and low back pain in 17%, while 44% of women reported no additional symptoms. The study observed a significant correlation among women living in rural areas and small urban areas. In contrast, a previous survey distinguished the three most important etiological factors for SUI occurrence in premenopausal and postmenopausal women in Poland. The analysis results clearly indicated that patient age (p = 0.0001), body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.0001), and surgical removal of the uterus by laparotomy (p = 0.0001) had the greatest influence on SUI incidence. The impact of other etiological factors remained quite controversial [22]. In Japan women, stress incontinence was prevalent at all ages and the incidence of UI increased over 70 years of age. Urinary incontinence was more likely as activities of daily living limitations and cystitis increased. Women with a history of hysterectomy or diabetes mellitus were at increased risk for UI [23]. The most common risk factors UI, among Turkish women, were age, number of births, body mass index >25 kg/m2, recurrent urinary infection, diabetes mellitus and vaginal delivery [24].

Assessing women’s knowledge levels, the study observed that women using UI prophylaxis were significantly more likely to indicate up to 6 max allowable micturitions/day, whereas women not using prophylaxis were significantly more likely to indicate more than 8 micturitions/day. Similarly, regarding the allowable number of micturitions per night, it was observed that women living in cities with more than 50,000 residents were significantly more likely to indicate up to 2 allowable micturitions/night. The knowledge of the female respondents ranged from 14.29% to 100%. Thus, the study certainly shows that women who use preventive measures are significantly more informed and aware compared to those who do not, as indicated by their self-evaluation on this matter. Additionally, a significantly higher level of knowledge is evident among women aged up to 35 with higher education, with no significant impact observed based on place of residence or marital status. In the study by Aramowicz et al. [25], most of the respondents considered their level of knowledge to be average (27%), sufficient (23.7%) and weak (15.1%). In contrast, 24.3% of the respondents consider their scope of information on SUI as good and very good (7.9%). Therefore, the state of knowledge of women in the field of SUI is still insufficient [25]. Derewiecki et al. [26] in their study of women’s knowledge about incontinence obtained the following data: in I group — women reporting an UI problem, 73.68% declared knowledge at a sufficient level, while in II group — women without UI symptoms, it was only 22.5%. In a similar study conducted by Bakalczuk et al. [27], 36.5% of the respondents evaluated their state of knowledge as good, about 34.9% as sufficient and 18.7% of the women possessed insufficient knowledge. Despite general awareness that the problem of UI exists, still remains at too low a level to decrease the percentage of people affected by this affliction [27].

To implement incontinence prevention, it is essential to eliminate risk factors. Avoiding constipation (by consuming a diet rich in fiber and ensuring adequate hydration of the body), engaging in regular physical activity, maintaining normal body weight, quitting smoking, and adopting proper toilet habits (such as avoiding urine retention and refraining from pushing during micturition) are necessary for preventing UI. Additionally, UI prophylaxis users were significantly more likely to indicate that pelvic floor muscle exercises were the least invasive form of UI treatment (χ2 = 9.17; p = 0.03). Although risk factors cannot be eliminated from our lives, the sooner healthy habits are consistently implemented, the greater the chance that incontinence complaints can be prevented [28]. It is also important to consider menopausal urogenital syndrome, where estrogen deficiency contributes to urogenital atrophy. Patients experiencing reduced elasticity and resilience of the vaginal and urethral mucosa may have increased symptoms of incontinence [29]. In such cases, topical therapy using vaginal estrogens or prasterone can significantly reduce discomfort, alleviate vaginal atrophy, and decrease the frequency of incontinence episodes [30].

5. Conclusions

Women’s age and education affect knowledge of incontinence prevention. Taking into account their commonness in society, lower urinary tract symptoms have the characteristics of a disease requiring the development of a system of preventive, educational, and therapeutic activities. That is why multi-level cooperation is so important to increase the effectiveness of therapy.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author Contributions

MWiś and KC-W designed the research study. MWiś, KC-W, KT, AM, KW, MWil performed the research. KC-W, KT, AM, KW, MWil analyzed the data. KC-W, KT, AM, MWil, KW wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the survey-based, anonymous nature of the study. As the survey is anonymous, no informed consent is required.

Acknowledgment

We would like to express our gratitude to all those who helped us while writing this manuscript. Thanks to all the peer reviewers for their opinions and suggestions.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Karolina Chmaj-Wierzchowska, Maciej Wilczak and Katarzyna Wszołek are serving as Guest editors of this journal. We declare that Karolina Chmaj-Wierzchowska, Maciej Wilczak and Katarzyna Wszołek had no involvement in the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to Ugo Indraccolo.

References

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.