Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) are physical complaints for which no
organic cause can be found after evaluation. They are distinct from somatic
symptom disorder which require additional psychiatric criteria [1], and may
encompass up to 40–49% of patients in primary care [2] and over 20% among
hospitalized patients [3]. Recent data suggest a different perspective in a
subgroup of these patients. An important, carefully-conducted study demonstrated
an unequivocal increase in physician visits rates, as early as 14–15 years prior
to the onset of clinically-recognized multiple sclerosis (MS). Visit rates were
significantly increased compared to a matched cohort from the general population,
and often involve non-specific, ill-defined complaints such as fatigue, pain,
gastrointestinal and urinary disturbances, anxiety, depression, and insomnia,
recorded 4–15 years prior to multiple sclerosis onset [4]. The design of the
study precludes elucidation of the patients’ experience, but this aspect is too
important to be neglected. These relatively young patients (mean 37.9
10.9 years) of all socio-economic quintiles (74% female), repeatedly presented
over years with diverse, poorly-understood symptoms. They likely required
multiple referrals and tests with substantially increased health services
utilization and cost. However, their recurrent complaints evaded explanation (or
relief) for a long time, yet by inference these complaints were multiple
sclerosis-related, due at least in part, to early, “subclinical” pathology. In
all probability, they were labeled by their physicians as “medically unexplained
symptoms” (i.e., persistent physical symptoms), ‘difficult patients’, or
patients with psychological/psychiatric problems [1, 2, 3]. These patients may feel a
sense of relief, even in the face of a serious diagnosis, to finally be given a
name—a cause of their longstanding poor health and an end to frustrating
clinical encounters. Similar diagnostic delays have been reported in systemic
lupus erythematosus (SLE), where early disease manifestations may be highly
diverse, affect any system, and accrue over time, associated in some cases with
years of undiagnosed symptoms and compromised quality of life [5]. Quite a few
other conditions exhibit insidious onset, slow progression, and protean
manifestations—often associated with diagnostic delays of several years from
the onset of symptoms. Notable examples are endometriosis (approximately 7–8
years), coeliac disease (approximately 3.5 years), and acromegaly
(approximately 12 years). Even common conditions may present atypically, such
as the prodromal symptoms of Parkinson disease which can precede the overt
classic motor symptoms by 10 years, leading to long diagnostic delays [6].
Other rare diseases such as gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours, type 1 multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN1), primary immunodeficiency, sarcoidosis, chronic
inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), or idiopathic pulmonary
fibrosis (IPF) may also cause symptoms over years, before a diagnosis is made.
Thus, a recent retrospective survey of patients living with a rare disease found
that the average time from first medical contact to a confirmed diagnosis was 4.3
years, and 25% waited more than 5 years to be diagnosed [7]. The “takeaway
message” for clinicians is surely not to subject all patients with
poorly-explained complaints to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to rule out
multiple sclerosis or CIDP. The majority of MUS remains MUS, and not a prodrome
of a later diagnosis. However, it is definitely a call for more humility among
clinicians [8]. This is especially needed since much of our clinical work is “in
the judgment and articulation of uncertainty in the face of imperfect information
and evidence” [9]. Humility enhances tolerance of uncertainty, and promotes an
attitude of patience and respect towards patients, even when their complaints are
repetitive, or poorly understood. Thus, the patient may be right, and subjective
grievances need to be recorded, contemplated, and followed. Several key principles
may facilitate a more timely diagnosis in these patients. First, listening
attentively to the patient, bearing in mind the entities mentioned above. This is
especially important since there may be few objective findings in the early
stages. Second, a positive family history may point the finger in the right
direction, and trigger a more focused search [10]. Third, longitudinal tracking
of symptom evolution and health care utilization is essential. Noticing a
crescendo pattern or the discovery of new findings on physical examination or
laboratory tests may signal an underlying prodromal phase of an evolving disease.
Either can provide a lead towards a diagnosis. Fourth, artificial intelligence
(AI) search tools for physicians may be utilized to check on perplexing symptom
clusters that evade explanation. Clinical decision support tools may also aid in
systematically identifying clinical key red flags in patients with prolonged
nonspecific symptoms [9]. Finally, person-centred biopsychosocial consultations
are indispensable in managing medically unexplained symptoms [1], and highly
selected patients may be considered for possible referral to a tertiary centre.
Thus, the main ‘take home’ message is the need of an increased awareness that
“medically unexplained symptoms” (MUS) may sometimes signify a yet-unrecognized
rare or slowly-evolving disease. Diagnostic delays are one type of diagnostic
errors, which unfortunately remain an obstinate problem [11]. Patients who
present with persistent medically unexplained symptoms, are more susceptible.
Although the majority of patients with unexplained medical symptoms will not go
on to develop a related illness, practitioners need to be aware that in a
significant minority, they may represent the tip of the iceberg of a rare disease
or an unusual, unexpected presentation of a more common condition. A higher
index of suspicion and application of the suggested attitude and approach, may
lead to a more timely diagnosis, and treatment at a stage that can prevent
further loss of tissue and function.
Key Points
• Patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) are often
encountered in general practice, specialist, and hospital settings alike.
• In a significant minority, repeated visits with such symptoms
signify a rare disease or an unusual presentation of a more common condition, and
years may elapse before a diagnosis is confirmed—a diagnostic delay which is
both frustrating and deleterious to the patient.
• Several techniques may facilitate a more timely diagnosis,
including physician’s humility; equanimity in the face of uncertainty; and use of
dedicated information technology.
• Patient-centred biopsychosocial consultations are recommended for
managing persistent medically unexplained symptoms.
Availability of Data and Materials
All the data of this study are included in this article.
Author Contributions
All elements of the study and subsequent write-up were carried out by the author [AS]. The author read and approved the final manuscript. The author has participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Acknowledgment
Not applicable.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflict of Interest
Ami Schattner is serving as one of the Editorial Board Members of this journal. We declare that Ami Schattner had no involvement in the review of this article and has no access to information regarding its review. The author declares no conflict of interest. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to Edwin C Jesudason.