Academic Editor

Article Metrics

  • Fig. 1.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 2.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 3.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 4.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 5.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 6.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Fig. 7.

    View in Article
    Full Image
  • Information

  • Download

  • Contents

Abstract

Aims/Background:

To explore the factors influencing sleep disorders in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) after ketogenic diet intervention and establish a predictive model.

Methods:

Data of 220 PCOS patients undergoing ketogenic diet intervention at Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, from January 2021 to December 2023 were retrospectively collected. Patients were randomly divided into the modelling group (132 patients) and the validation group (88 patients) in a 3:2 ratio. The modelling group was further divided into the sleep disorder group (56 patients) and the non-sleep disorder group (76 patients). Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the influencing factors of sleep disorders after administering a ketogenic diet intervention in patients with PCOS. The predictive model was constructed using SPSS, and analyses of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed in the R language to evaluate the clinical practicality of the model.

Results:

In the modelling group, anxiety (odds ratio [OR] = 1.768, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.284–2.434, p < 0.001), depression (OR = 1.494, 95% CI: 1.193–1.872, p < 0.001), blood sugar status (impaired fasting glucose/tolerance) (OR = 5.278, 95% CI: 1.533–18.177, p = 0.008) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c; OR = 1.619, 95% CI: 1.201–2.181, p = 0.002) were significant factors affecting sleep disorders. The prediction model incorporates these factors (X1–X4), and the model expression is Logit(P) = βConstant + (β1X1) + (β2X2) + (β3X3) + (β4X4). The calibration curve showed good agreement between predicted risks and actual risks. ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve was 0.9328 (95% CI: 0.892–0.954) for the modelling group and 0.8431 (95% CI: 0.777–0.899) for the validation group, both indicating that the model has high accuracy. DCA curves showed that the model has significant positive net benefits and good clinical utility.

Conclusion:

Anxiety, depression, blood sugar status and LDL-c are key factors influencing sleep disorders in patients with PCOS after ketogenic diet intervention. A prediction model featuring high accuracy and remarkable clinical utility was successfully established.

1. Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex endocrine disorder characterised by reproductive dysfunction and metabolic abnormalities, including chronic anovulation, excess androgens, and insulin resistance, and is one of the most common causes of menstrual irregularities in women of reproductive age [1]. PCOS not only affects the fertility of patients but also increases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension syndrome, and endometrial cancer [2, 3]. Therefore, early prevention and treatment of PCOS are of paramount importance. In recent years, the ketogenic diet has shown promising effects in the treatment of PCOS as a specialised dietary intervention. The ketogenic diet, characterised by an altered dietary composition comprising very low carbohydrate intake, moderate protein intake, and high fat intake, induces a metabolic state called ketosis [4, 5]. This dietary approach aims to stimulate the production of ketone bodies as the primary energy source, thereby improving hormone levels and weight status in PCOS patients. Several studies have demonstrated significant improvements in hormone levels and weight reduction in obese PCOS patients following the ketogenic diet, leading to enhanced fertility [6, 7]. However, despite the positive outcomes achieved with the ketogenic diet in PCOS treatment, its potential side effects and complications cannot be overlooked [8].

In the first 1–2 weeks of ketone production, some patients with PCOS may experience adaptive symptoms such as temporary drowsiness and fatigue, which are usually related to the adaptation period of ketone body metabolism or electrolyte loss [9]. The symptoms are mild and mostly resolve spontaneously. In addition, discomfort such as constipation and elevated uric acid can be improved by adjusting diet (such as increasing dietary fibre, supplementing minerals) or symptomatic treatment. Nevertheless, the impact of the ketogenic diet on sleep quality in patients with PCOS remains under-explored [10]. Potential mechanisms may involve blood sugar fluctuations, interference of ketone body metabolism on neurotransmitters (such as γ-aminobutyric acid [GABA]), and psychological stress caused by diet strictness.

Sleep disorders represent one of the complications that may arise following ketogenic diet intervention, possibly linked to various factors, including changes in lifestyle habits, negative emotions, environmental adjustments, and physiological conditions. Sleep disorders not only impact the quality of life for patients but may also exacerbate the symptoms of PCOS, creating a vicious cycle. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the influencing factors of sleep disorders in PCOS patients following ketogenic diet intervention and establish a corresponding predictive model, with the ultimate hope of formulating preventive and treatment strategies for sleep disorders in this patient population receiving ketogenic diet.

2. Methods
2.1 Research Subjects

The sample size for this research was calculated using the formula N = Zα/22π(1 – π)/δ2, under the assumption that the incidence of complex sleep disorders in patients with PCOS is 16.14% [11]. With α = 0.05 and the allowable error δ = 0.06, the sample size was determined as at least 145. Taking into account the existence of invalid samples, the sample size was expanded by 20%, raising it to at least 174 cases. Data of a total of 300 samples were retrospectively collected for screening. Patients with missing data were removed, and eventually, 220 samples were included. The sample included consists of 220 patients with PCOS who underwent ketogenic diet intervention at Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, from January 2021 to December 2023. Using a random number table method, the patients were divided into a modelling group (n = 132) and a validation group (n = 88) according to a ratio of 3:2. Within the modelling group, patients were further categorized into a sleep disorder group (n = 56) and a non-sleep disorder group (n = 76) based on whether they experienced sleep disturbances (Fig. 1). The inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) patients who met the clinical diagnosis of PCOS according to the Rotterdam criteria [12], in which the essential criteria include oligomenorrhea, amenorrhea, or abnormal uterine bleeding, in addition to meeting one of the following: (a) clinical manifestations of elevated androgens and/or hyperandrogenism, or (b) ultrasound evidence of polycystic ovaries, characterized by the presence of 12 follicles measuring 2–9 mm in diameter in one or both ovaries, and/or ovarian volume 10 cm3; (2) patients who had not taken any corticosteroids, insulin sensitizers, lipid-lowering agents, or weight loss drugs in the past 3 months; and (3) patients aged between 18 and 40 years. The exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) patients with other endocrine disorders like thyroid diseases; (2) patients who had sleep disorders before ketogenic diet intervention; (3) patients with concurrent liver or kidney dysfunction; and (4) patients who discontinued the ketogenic diet treatment. This study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all patients provided their informed consent.

Fig. 1.

Flowchart of subject recruitment and grouping.

2.2 Research Methods

This study encompasses the implementation of a literature review to understand possible relevant influencing factors, the collection of clinical data, and the removal of patient information with missing data.

In reference to previous research literature, we collected general patient data (such as age, body mass index [BMI], place of residence, smoking status, etc.), anxiety, depression, blood sugar status, as well as levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), lipoprotein, and Apolipoprotein A (ApoA). These data were gathered through the electronic medical record system and by conducting the inquiry.

Sleep disorder assessment was conducted in this study using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scale, which consists of 7 items, each scored from 0 to 3, with a total score ranging from 0 to 21 [13]. The critical value for defining the quality of sleep is 5 points. With the PSQI score 5 points combined with abnormal sleep structure detected through polysomnography, the patient is considered to suffer from a sleep disorder.

Anxiety in patients was assessed using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) self-assessment scale, which comprises 7 items, each scored from 0 to 3, with a total score ranging from 0 to 21 [14]. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety in patients.

Assessment of depression among the patients was performed with the use of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) self-assessment scale, which consists of 9 items, each scored from 0 to 3, with a total score ranging from 0 to 27 [15]. Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression in patients.

2.3 Statistical Analysis

Experimental data collected were analysed with SPSS 27.0 (International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess data normality. Normally distributed quantitative data are represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Independent sample t-tests were used for comparisons of this type of data. Categorical data are presented as frequencies or rates, and their comparisons were analysed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Factors influencing the occurrence of sleep disorders in PCOS patients after intervention with a ketogenic diet were analysed with univariate and binary logistic regression analyses. Variables found to be statistically significant in univariate analysis were tested in binary logistic regression analysis. Predictive models were built using SPSS; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated using R language (4.4.2, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand), calibration curves were constructed using R language, and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves were used to assess the application value of the model. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for differences.

3. Results
3.1 General Information

Comparison of general information between the modelling group and the validation group of patients showed no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1. Comparison of general information of patients in the modelling group and validation group.
Baseline data Modelling group (n = 132) Validation group (n = 88) t/χ2 value p-value
Age (years) 30.11 ± 6.19 29.70 ± 7.17 0.451 0.652
BMI (kg/m2) 31.27 ± 2.85 30.71 ± 4.58 1.118 0.265
Residence 0.098 0.755
Urban 112 76
Rural 20 12
Smoking 1.220 0.269
Yes 13 5
No 119 83
Anxiety (score) 8.02 ± 1.84 7.71 ± 2.86 0.979 0.329
Depression (score) 13.47 ± 2.82 12.83 ± 1.85 1.716 0.088
Blood sugar status 0.123 0.940
Normal 87 60
Impaired fasting glucose/tolerance 24 15
Diabetes 21 13
LDL-c (mmol/L) 2.92 ± 0.21 2.88 ± 0.15 1.543 0.124
Lipoprotein (mg/L) 122.66 ± 27.71 122.40 ± 30.31 0.066 0.948
ApoA (g/L) 1.14 ± 0.07 1.15 ± 0.07 1.038 0.300

Abbreviations: ApoA, Apolipoprotein A; BMI, body mass index; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

3.2 Univariate Analysis of Factors Influencing the Occurrence of Sleep Disorders in PCOS Patients After Ketogenic Diet Intervention

In the modelling group, comparisons of age, BMI, residence, smoking, lipoprotein levels, and ApoA levels showed no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05), while comparisons of anxiety, depression, blood sugar status, and LDL-c levels revealed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05), as shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Univariate analysis of factors influencing the occurrence of sleep disorders in PCOS patients after ketogenic diet intervention.
Baseline data Sleep disorder group (n = 56) Non-sleep disorder group (n = 76) t/χ2 value p-value
Age (years) 30.07 ± 6.41 30.14 ± 6.07 0.064 0.949
BMI (kg/m2) 31.67 ± 2.69 30.98 ± 2.94 1.381 0.170
Residence 0.554 0.457
Urban 46 66
Rural 10 10
Smoking 0.082 0.774
Yes 6 7
No 50 69
Anxiety (score) 8.91 ± 1.46 7.36 ± 1.82 5.146 <0.001
Depression (score) 14.80 ± 3.48 12.49 ± 1.64 5.077 <0.001
Blood sugar status 26.84 <0.001
Normal 23 64
Impaired fasting glucose/tolerance 17 7
Diabetes 16 5
LDL-c (mmol/L) 3.02 ± 0.24 2.84 ± 0.14 5.411 <0.001
Lipoprotein (mg/L) 122.58 ± 24.93 122.71 ± 29.76 0.027 0.979
ApoA (g/L) 1.13 ± 0.06 1.15 ± 0.07 1.722 0.087

Abbreviations: ApoA, Apolipoprotein A; BMI, body mass index; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.

3.3 Binary Logistic Regression Analysis

Statistically significant variables identified from the univariate analysis were included in the binary logistic regression analysis, in which anxiety, depression, blood sugar status, and LDL-c were regarded as independent variables, as shown in Table 3, with the occurrence of sleep disorders as the dependent variable (1 = occurred, 0 = not occurred). The results of the binary logistic regression analysis indicated that anxiety, depression, blood sugar status, and LDL-c were influencing factors for the occurrence of sleep disorders in PCOS patients after ketogenic diet intervention (p < 0.05), as shown in Table 4.

Table 3. Variable assignment.
Variable Assignment
Anxiety Original value
Depression Original value
Blood sugar status Normal = 0, Impaired fasting glucose/tolerance = 1, Diabetes = 2
LDL-c Original value

Abbreviation: LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Table 4. Results of binary logistic regression analysis.
Dependent variable β Standard error Wald p-value Exp (β) 95% CI
Lower limit Upper limit
Anxiety 0.570 0.163 12.196 <0.001 1.768 1.284 2.434
Depression 0.402 0.115 12.194 <0.001 1.494 1.193 1.872
Blood sugar status - - 8.585 0.014 - - -
Blood sugar status (n = 1) 1.664 0.631 6.953 0.008 5.278 1.533 18.177
Blood sugar status (n = 2) 1.257 0.717 3.068 0.080 3.514 0.861 14.336
LDL-c 0.482 0.152 10.016 0.002 1.619 1.201 2.181
Constant –28.470 6.257 20.703 <0.001 <0.001 - -

Abbreviation: LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; CI, confidence interval.

3.4 Establishment of Predictive Model

Based on the results of the logistic regression analysis, with anxiety, depression, blood sugar status, and LDL-c (named X1, X2, X3, and X4, respectively) incorporated into the predictive model, the combined predictive factor model expression is Logit(P) = βConstant + (β1X1) + (β2X2) + (β3X3) + (β4X4). Blood sugar status is a categorical variable, and hence its β value changes according to classification: When it is normal, the β value is 0; when the blood sugar status is impaired fasting glucose/tolerance, it is 1.664; and when the blood sugar status is diabetes, it is 1.257. The calibration curve of the model for both the modelling and validation groups has a slope of close to 1, indicating good consistency between the predicted risk and the actual risk for sleep disorders in PCOS patients after ketogenic diet intervention (Figs. 2,3, respectively).

Fig. 2.

Calibration curve of the modelling group. The curve has a slope which is close to 1, indicating that the model has a good consistency between the predicted risk and the actual risk for sleep disorders in PCOS patients after ketogenic diet intervention.

Fig. 3.

Calibration curve of the validation group. The curve has a slope closely resembling to 1, indicating that the model has a relatively good consistency between the predicted risk and the actual risk for sleep disorders in PCOS patients after ketogenic diet intervention.

3.5 ROC Curve Analysis

For the modelling group, the model’s area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.9328, indicating high performance for predicting the development of sleep disorders in PCOS patients after ketogenic diet intervention, with a standard error of 0.019 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.892–0.954) and a Youden index of 0.75, along with sensitivity of 92.3% and specificity of 83.4%, as shown in Fig. 4. In the validation group, the model’s AUC was 0.8431, with a standard error of 0.032 (95% CI: 0.777–0.899) and a Youden index of 0.62, along with sensitivity of 78.5% and specificity of 83.3%, as depicted in Fig. 5.

Fig. 4.

ROC curve of the modelling group. The AUC is close to 1, indicating excellent predictive performance of the model in the modelling group. Abbreviations: AUC, area under the ROC curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.

Fig. 5.

ROC curve of the validation group. With 0.7 < AUC 0.9, the model has a rather good predictive performance for the development of sleep disorders in PCOS patients after ketogenic diet intervention in the validation group. Abbreviations: AUC, area under the ROC curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.

3.6 Clinical Benefit Analysis of Predictive Model

To evaluate the clinical utility of the model in predicting therapeutic efficacy, DCA curves for the modelling and validation groups were plotted. The curves are close to the upper right and higher than the Non and All line benefits. Based on the results, it is evident that the model exhibits a clear positive net benefit, indicating good clinical utility (Figs. 6,7).

Fig. 6.

DCA curve of the modelling group. Abbreviation: DCA, decision curve analysis.

Fig. 7.

DCA curve of the validation group. Abbreviation: DCA, decision curve analysis.

4. Discussion

This study, through an in-depth retrospective analysis, aims to reveal the factors influencing the occurrence of sleep disorders in PCOS patients following ketogenic diet intervention. By systematically collecting and analysing a large amount of clinical data, this study identified influencing factors and successfully constructed a predictive model with clinical application potential. This research not only deepens our understanding of the mechanisms underlying sleep disorders in PCOS patients following ketogenic diet intervention but also provides a scientific basis for personalised treatment and early intervention.

In this study, univariate analysis and binary logistic regression analyses were adopted to identify the main factors influencing the occurrence of sleep disorders in PCOS patients following ketogenic diet intervention. The results indicate that anxiety, depression, blood sugar level, and LDL-c level are significant influencing factors. The analysis suggests that PCOS patients often experience psychological stress and emotional fluctuations due to the impact of the disease [16]. The ketogenic diet is a specialised dietary approach that also involves significant adjustments to patients’ daily habits and alterations to their dietary structure, which may potentially increase psychological stress to some extent, thereby triggering or exacerbating anxiety and depression, ultimately leading to sleep disturbances. Research by Yang et al. [17] has demonstrated a significant relationship between anxiety/depression status and sleep conditions in PCOS patients, aligning closely with the findings of this study, further confirming the association between anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbances in PCOS patients. The ketogenic diet helps patients achieve a state of ketosis through a reduction in carbohydrate intake, which consequently lowers blood sugar levels [18]. However, excessively low blood sugar levels can lead to feelings of fatigue, dizziness and anxiety, thereby impacting sleep quality [19]. Furthermore, fluctuations in blood sugar levels may also have adverse effects on sleep. Research by Tasali et al. [20] demonstrated a close relationship between glucose tolerance in PCOS patients with the risk and severity of obstructive sleep apnea, providing concordant support to our findings that blood sugar levels are one of the significant factors influencing sleep disturbances in PCOS patients following ketogenic diet intervention. These findings collectively highlight the importance of closely monitoring patients’ blood sugar levels and taking necessary measures to maintain stable blood glucose levels during ketogenic diet interventions. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is a vital component of blood lipids, with elevated levels closely associated with cardiovascular disease. Interventions such as a ketogenic diet in PCOS patients can also impact LDL-c levels, leading to their fluctuations. The current study identified LDL-c levels as one of the factors influencing sleep disturbances in PCOS patients following the ketogenic diet. Hence, when implementing a ketogenic diet intervention, it is crucial to monitor patients’ lipid levels and take necessary steps to reduce LDL-c levels [21].

Advanced statistical methods like logistic regression analysis were employed in the model construction process to ensure its accuracy and reliability. Moreover, various methods such as ROC analysis, calibration curves, and DCA were used to evaluate the model’s utility, further validating its accuracy and reliability. Using logistic regression analysis, a predictive model incorporating factors such as anxiety, depression, blood sugar levels, and LDL-c was constructed to assess the risk of sleep disturbances in PCOS patients following the ketogenic diet. The comparative analysis of modelling and validation group data revealed that the model’s calibration curve slope is close to 1, and the high AUC detected through the ROC analyses indicated excellent sensitivity and specificity of the model, which are indicative of its high accuracy and reliability in application. In a comprehensive consideration of the impact of multiple factors such as anxiety, depression, blood sugar levels, and LDL-c on sleep disturbances, this predictive model enables a more holistic and accurate prediction of the risk of sleep disturbances in PCOS patients following ketogenic diet intervention. Thus, this model can assist with assessing the risk of sleep disturbances in PCOS patients following ketogenic diet intervention and provide guidance in the implementation of appropriate interventions, with the ultimate clinical goal of enhancing patient treatment outcomes and quality of life.

The predictive model established in this study holds significant promise for clinical applications. Firstly, the model can guide the development of ketogenic diet intervention plans for PCOS patients. By predicting the risk of developing sleep disturbances, physicians can promptly adjust dietary structures and intervention strategies to reduce the incidence of sleep disturbances. Secondly, the model can be utilised to evaluate the treatment outcomes of PCOS patients following ketogenic diet interventions. By comparing predicted risk values before and after treatment, physicians can objectively assess treatment effectiveness and make necessary adjustments in treatment strategies. Furthermore, the model can serve as a reference for research on other related diseases. For instance, researchers can draw inspiration from the current model construction approach and methods of this study to establish relevant predictive models when exploring the factors influencing the occurrence of sleep disturbances in patients with other endocrine or metabolic disorders following ketogenic diet interventions.

Several limitations of this research should be highlighted. First of all, due to the retrospective nature of research, this study is vulnerable to problems such as information and selection biases. Prospective research is needed in the future to further verify the accuracy and reliability of the model. Secondly, owing to the small sample size, the findings obtained in this study cannot be reliably generalised to other populations. Third, the lack of external verification (external verification refers to the process of secondary verification of conclusions using a data set or method independent of the original research sample in scientific research or data analysis) in this study limits the applicability of the model. Finally, the associations of variables detected in this study do not infer causality. Additionally, the impact of baseline anxiety/depression levels on sleep was not explored in this investigation. Patients with higher baseline anxiety/depression may have experienced worse-quality sleep before the ketogenic diet intervention; therefore, these factors are potential confounders which may interfere with the accuracy of the results. Taken together, subsequent baseline assessments need to be included to clarify causality. Furthermore, the impact of differences in ketogenic diet therapy on patient outcomes was not considered. Different lengths and types of treatment may engender varying effects on individual patients; for instance, short-term and long-term, strict ketogenic and modified ketogenic diets may impact sleep health differently. Subsequent research should refine these factors to more accurately assess their impact. In future investigations, subsequent studies should include more factors, including other potential confounders, for analysis to more accurately reveal the true connection between each factor and sleep. It is also necessary to expand the sample size and improve the statistical effectiveness of the research. In summary, data and model validation using a different cohort of patients is needed to refine the predictive model in terms of accuracy and reliability.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, this study successfully established a model for predicting sleep disorders in PCOS patients following ketogenic diet intervention, which exhibits high levels of accuracy and reliability. The comprehensive incorporation of multiple influencing factors for sleep disorders in the construction of this model allows for more holistic and accurate prediction of the risk for sleep disorders in patients. Therefore, this model holds significant promises for clinical applications, providing practical guidance for enhancing treatment outcomes in this patient cohort and their quality of life. Moving forward, it is essential to further refine the model, in terms of accuracy and reliability, through prospective studies involving an expanded sample size.

Key Points

Analyse the factors that affect sleep disorders in PCOS patients after ketogenic diet intervention and establish a prediction model.

Univariate and binary logistic regression were used to determine important factors affecting sleep disorders, which is scientific.

Anxiety, depression, impaired fasting blood glucose/tolerance and elevated LDL-c are important factors affecting sleep disorders. The prediction model incorporating these factors showed high accuracy, with ROC curve areas of 0.9328 (modelling group) and 0.8431 (validation group).

The model showed good consistency between predicted risks and actual risks, and had significant positive net benefits in decision curve analysis, indicating that predicting sleep disorders after a ketogenic diet in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome has strong clinical practicality.

Availability of Data and Materials

All data included in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Author Contributions

WB designed the research study. MX and JL performed the research. MX analysed the data. MX drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the important editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University (IIT2024-113-001). This study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all patients provided their informed consent.

Acknowledgement

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.