IMR Press / FBL / Volume 29 / Issue 5 / DOI: 10.31083/j.fbl2905182
Open Access Review
Roles and Mechanisms of Choline Metabolism in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Cancers
Show Less
1 College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, 430070 Wuhan, Hubei, China
2 College of Biomedicine and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, 430070 Wuhan, Hubei, China
3 Department of Medical Oncology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Tongji Medical College, Hubei Cancer Hospital, 430079 Wuhan, Hubei, China
*Correspondence: Xuechang91@163.com (Chang Xue); Chengzhienn@163.com (Runzhi Chen)
These authors contributed equally.
Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed) 2024, 29(5), 182; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2905182
Submitted: 11 December 2023 | Revised: 14 March 2024 | Accepted: 20 March 2024 | Published: 11 May 2024
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract

Choline participates in three major metabolic pathways: oxidation, phosphorylation, and acetylation. Through oxidation, choline is converted to betaine and contributes to methyl metabolism and epigenetic regulation. Through phosphorylation, choline participates in phospholipid metabolism, and serves as the precursor of phosphocholine, phosphatidylcholine, glycerophosphocholine, and other essential compounds, thereby modulating lipid metabolism and transport. Through acetylation, choline is transformed into acetylcholine in cholinergic neurons, playing a vital role in neurotransmission. Moreover, gut microbiota can metabolize choline into trimethylamine-N-oxide, and be involved in the pathogenesis of various diseases such as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), cancer, cardiovascular disease, etc. Since choline metabolism is implicated in the development of NAFLD and diverse cancers, including liver cancer, it may serve as a therapeutic target for these diseases in the future. Currently, there are numerous therapeutic agents targeting choline metabolism to treat NAFLD and cancers, but most of them are ineffective and some even have adverse effects that lead to a series of complications. Therefore, further research and clinical validation are required to obtain safe and efficacious drugs. This review comprehensively summarizes the choline metabolic pathway and its regulatory mechanisms, elucidates the roles and mechanisms of choline metabolism in the aforementioned diseases, and provides a discussion of the current advances and immense potential of this field.

Keywords
choline
acetylcholine
betaine
phosphatidylcholine
nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
cancer
1. Introduction

Choline, a nutrient procured both through dietary intake and endogenous synthesis, is fundamentally a methyl-rich quaternary amine, which manifests in all mammalian tissues either freely or in an esterified form [1]. In 1998, the Institute of Medicine acknowledged choline as an essential nutrient and proposed pertinent dietary guidelines [2]. Noteworthy sources of dietary choline include animal liver, eggs, and wheat germ, and it exists freely in food and is also found in the enzyme cholinesterase [3]. Choline participates in lipid transport, methylation metabolism, cell membrane signal transduction, and neurotransmitter synthesis through oxidation, phosphorylation, and acetylation pathways [4].

Studies have demonstrated that low choline intake (approximately <150 mg/day) is related to a decline in cognitive function, while high choline intake (approximately >500 mg/day) may increase the risks of malignant tumor, and cardiovascular disease [2, 5]. A case-control study suggested that higher intakes of choline and betaine may be associated with a lower risk of primary liver cancer and augmented liver health [6].

The polymorphism of enzymes in choline metabolic pathway may be related to the occurrence of cancer. A case-control study in China revealed a negative correlation between dietary choline intake and the risk of breast cancer. The polymorphism of phosphatidylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase (PEMT) rs7946 and betaine homocysteine methyltransferase (BHMT) rs3733890 may be related to the effect of choline intake on breast cancer risk. Low choline intake was associated with a significantly increased risk of breast cancer in women with wild-type PEMT rs7946 or BHMT rs3733890 [7]. Moreover, the increased resonance of total choline compounds (tCho) in vivo has also been reported as a common feature of many cancers [8]. The changes of choline phospholipid metabolism detected by non-invasive magnetic resonance spectroscopy can be used as endogenous tumor biomarkers. Similarly, choline kinase, phosphatidylcholine specific phospholipase C and D, and other choline metabolism related enzymes are considered as new targets of tumor therapy [4, 9].

Choline also promotes cell growth and division [10]. Some studies have shown that choline and dimethylglycine produce superoxide/hydrogen peroxide through the electron transport chain of liver mitochondria. Hydrogen peroxide is a mitotic factor and a mitochondrial signal molecule, which coordinates mitochondrial metabolism and cell physiological changes. The essential metabolites involved in the production of methionine and folate are the sources of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in liver mitochondria. ROS signal transduction from mitochondria to the rest of cells is involved in regulating various functions of cells, including division, growth, and many other functions [11].

2. Choline Metabolism
2.1 Choline, Betaine, and Methyl Metabolism

Choline, is a trimethyl compound. In the liver and kidney, choline oxidase system (composed of choline dehydrogenase and betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase) first catalyzes the formation of betaine aldehyde and then converts it into betaine [7, 12, 13]. Betaine is an osmotic regulator that can be accumulated or released according to the cell volume and plays an important role in the homeostasis of human body [4, 12], as well as in protecting the liver [13]. It has been reported that betaine supplementation can increase plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and reduce plasma high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol [14]. A meta-analysis showed that high betaine levels were associated with a lower risk of cancer, particularly colorectal cancer [14]. According to another report, betaine intake may be inversely proportional to the risk of fatal prostate cancer in white and African American men [15]. In addition, choline and betaine are involved in neurodevelopment and the pathogenesis of various chronic diseases, playing an important role in risk assessment and disease prevention [4].

Choline is also involved in methyl metabolism. In the liver, choline is irreversibly oxidized to betaine. With the assistance of BHMT and methionine synthetase (MTH), homocysteine is remethylated to methionine to produce S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) [16]. SAM is the main biological methylation agent, responsible for the methylation of DNA, RNA, and protein, as well as the biosynthesis of small molecules such as creatine, adrenaline, and phosphatidylcholine [1, 5, 11]. 1-carbon metabolism is essential for metabolism, cell proliferation, nerve function, signal transduction, and tissue development, and can be used in purine, amino acid and thymine biosynthesis (Fig. 1) [11]. Animal model studies have shown that there is an important relationship between choline/1-carbon metabolism and energy homeostasis [5].

Fig. 1.

Metabolism of choline-betaine. CHDH, choline dehydrogenase; BADH, betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase; mTHF, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate; THF, Tetrahydrofolate; BHMT, betaine homocysteine methyltransferase; MTH, methionine synthetase; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine.

2.2 Choline, Phosphatidylcholine, and Phospholipid Metabolism

Phospholipid metabolism is critical for cell proliferation as it manufactures the components required in the cell membrane and intracellular signaling. Mammalian cells synthesize phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine, the most abundant phospholipids in the cell membrane, through the Kennedy’s pathway and integrate them into the membrane [12, 17]. The synthesis of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine are called Cytidine Diphosphate Choline (CDP-choline) and CDP-ethanolamine pathways respectively [9].

Phosphatidylcholine (PC) is found extensively on mammalian cell membrane and acts as an important source of intermediate products of intracellular signal transduction pathway (such as second messenger phosphocholine, diacylglycerol and arachidonic acid metabolites, which are essential for cell mitotic activity) [18]. Inhibition of the synthesis of phosphatidylcholine in mammalian cells (including cancer cells) has been proved to induce cell death [19, 20]. Phosphatidylcholine is also the most important source of homocysteine in mammalian tissues, accounting for 95% of the total choline pool in mammalian tissues. The remaining 5% includes choline, phosphocholine, glycerophosphocholine, cytidine 5-diphosphate choline, and acetylcholine [4, 21].

The study on the synthesis and metabolism of phosphatidylcholine in mice showed that 70% of the synthesis of liver phosphatidylcholine came from the CDP-choline pathway while the other 30% came from the PEMT pathway [1, 2, 10]. As the CDP-choline pathway is essential for providing cell membrane and lipid secondary messengers, it is a key determinant of cell cycle progression, cell proliferation, and programmed cell death (apoptosis) [10]. Choline kinase (Chk) is a kind of cytosolic enzyme that exists in many different types of tissues. It catalyzes the phosphorylation of choline to form phosphocholine in the presence of Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and magnesium [22]. In the CDP-choline pathway, Choline enters cells through the action of transporters by crossing biological membranes, then choline kinase catalyzes the phosphorylation of choline by ATP hydrolysis to produce choline phosphate, which is then modified to cytidine diphosphate (CDP)-choline, and CDP-choline: 1,2-diacylglycerol cholinesterase (CPT) catalyzes the conversion of CDP-choline and diacylglycerol to phosphatidylcholine [12, 19]. Phosphocholine is both the precursor and the decomposition product of phosphatidylcholine. Together with other phospholipids such as phosphatidylethanolamine and neutral lipids, phosphatidylcholine forms a unique double-layer structure in the cell membrane and regulates the integrity of membrane [9]. In addition, PEMT pathway refers to the de novo synthesis of PC from phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) by the S-adenosylmethionine (SAM, intermediate product of methionine cycle) dependent enzyme PEMT [4, 10, 23]. Moreover, PC can be degraded by many phospholipases to form lipid intermediates, which can then be recycled or further processed [24]. It can also be decomposed by phospholipase A2 (PLA2), C, D, and phosphatidylserine synthetase 1, or converted to sphingomyelin (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Metabolism of choline-phosphatidylcholine. Chk, choline kinase; CDP-choline, cytidine diphosphate-choline; 1,2-DAG, 1,2-diacylglycerol; CPT, 1,2-diacylglycerol cholinephosphotransferase; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PEMT, phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase; VLDL, very low density lipoprotein.

2.3 Choline, Acetylcholine, and Neurotransmission

Choline-acetyltransferase (ChAT) is an enzyme highly concentrated in cholinergic nerve terminals. It catalyzes the reaction of acetyl-CoA with choline to produce acetylcholine, which acts as a neurotransmitter [2, 12, 25]. The ChAT in presynaptic cholinergic neurons synthesize acetylcholine, which is then absorbed into synaptic vesicles by vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT). After depolarization, acetylcholine is excreted. When it reaches the synaptic cleft, it binds to the receptors of postsynaptic neurons in the central and peripheral nervous systems. There are two types of receptors, including muscarinic and nicotinic receptors. Acetylcholine in the synaptic cleft is rapidly hydrolyzed by acetylcholinesterase (AChE) to form acetate and choline, which are circulated into presynaptic nerve endings by high affinity choline transporter (CHT1) (Fig. 3). This reuptake through the transporter contributes to the formation of the choline pool, which will be used by cholinergic neurons for the resynthesis of acetylcholine or the formation of phosphatidylcholine back to the biomembrane. Cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain, including those forming the Meynert basal nucleus, are severely lost in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [25, 26]. Acetylcholine synthesis has also been reported in tissues, including placenta, muscle, intestine, and lymphocytes [2].

Fig. 3.

Metabolism of choline-acetylcholine in cholinergic neurons. ChAT, choline acetyltransferase; Ach, acetylcholine; VAChT, vesicular acetylcholine transporter; AChE, acetylcholinesterase; CHT1, high affinity choline transporter.

3. The Relationship between Choline Metabolism And Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
3.1 Dysregulation of Choline Metabolism and Occurrence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
3.1.1 Pathogenesis of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)

NAFLD is the most common liver disease in adults and children in the world. The pathophysiology of NAFLD is multifactorial, stemming from a complex interplay of ecological, genetic, and metabolic factors, such as high energy intake, limited physical activity, and malnutrition [27]. Combined with epigenetic factors, these promote insulin resistance and liver fat accumulation [13, 28].

The hypothesis of “two hits” is proposed for the development of NAFLD [29, 30], in which “the first hit” involves the accumulation of lipid in hepatocytes. In fact, the increase in lipid uptake, the increase in de novo synthesis of fat, the decrease in lipoprotein synthesis, or the decrease in fatty acid oxidation may all lead to lipid accumulation. After the “first hit”, the liver has a heightened sensitivity to many previously inconsequential factors, including gut derived endotoxin, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, oxidative stress and subsequent lipid peroxidation, pro-inflammatory cytokines and adipocytokines signals, and mitochondrial dysfunction. These effects result in the “second hit”, which promotes liver cell damage and death, inflammation, activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), and production of extracellular matrix, eventually leading to fibrosis [30, 31]. A fatty liver could develop into liver damage accompanied by fibrosis. The process of fibrosis begins with the activation of HSCs by cytokines and growth factors, while the subsequent acquisition of a new set of epigenetic markers maintains this new cell phenotype. Low levels of inflammatory signaling combined with epigenetic mechanisms usually keep HSCs latent, so a reduction in the availability of methyl donors can induce and maintain hepatic fibrosis [32].

3.1.2 Disturbance of Lipid Homeostasis in NAFLD

Phospholipid balance, paramount for liver health, is maintained primarily by PEMT [33, 34, 35]. In the presence of PEMT, endogenous synthesis of phosphatidylcholine is possible, reducing the reliance on dietary choline [13]. When choline intake is insufficient, the PEMT pathway that synthesizes phosphatidylcholine becomes very important for maintaining the supply of phosphatidylcholine in the liver. Since the pathway occurs only in the presence of SAM, the regulation of SAM is essential in ensuring a sufficient phosphatidylcholine supply [1].

Any malfunctions in the metabolism of choline phospholipid could lead to hepatic steatosis, which can induce fatty liver. Hepatic steatosis occurs when fatty acid intake, de novo synthesis of fatty acid, or triglyceride synthesis in the liver exceeds the output or oxidation of lipids [1, 36]. Phosphatidylcholine is necessary for the assembly, secretion, and dissolution of cholesterol in bile. The homeostasis of phosphatidylcholine is achieved by balancing the uptake/synthesis of phosphatidylcholine, choline, and betaine, as well as the catabolism/secretion of phosphatidylcholine [1]. Phosphatidylcholine deficiency increases the de novo synthesis of saturated fatty acid in the liver. Compared with people with healthy liver, NAFLD patients exhibit an excessive level of triglycerides rich in saturated fatty acids, along with an increased risk of fatty liver disease, pancreatitis, cirrhosis, and liver cancer. This indicates that the increase in de novo synthesis of fat will lead to hepatic steatosis [1, 23]. Phosphatidylcholine is also involved in the assembly and secretion of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) [4, 37]. It is necessary for the packaging and export of triglycerides in VLDL and the dissolution of secretory bile salts. VLDL granules transport fat and cholesterol from the liver to peripheral organs. Abnormal VLDL mediated triglyceride secretion is the main culprit of hepatic steatosis [13, 37, 38]. The assembly and secretion of liver VLDL is a complex process, involving apolipoprotein B (ApoB), microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP), lipid mobilization, and synthesizing proteins. In fact, rare ApoB and MTP mutations are associated with progressive liver disease [23, 39].

The occurrence and development of NAFLD are closely related to obesity and insulin resistance. The accumulation of visceral adipose tissue is the main reason for an increase in fatty acids, proinflammatory regulators, and growth promoting regulators, it is closely related to the progress of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [40]. A low choline diet can lead to fatty liver and liver injury, possible due to the accumulation of fat and cholesterol in liver [4, 37]. This dietary requirement for choline is regulated by estrogen and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in specific genes in choline and folate metabolism [3]. The classical function of estrogen is realized by its receptor ERα and ERβ. ERα and ERβ bind to estrogen response elements (EREs) in the promoter regions of many estrogen response genes in the form of homodimer or heterodimer. Since there are several EREs in the promoter region of PEMT gene, estrogen can effectively regulate the expression of PEMT mRNA and the activity of liver cell enzyme when it is within the human physiological concentration range (0–100 nmol/L). Therefore, premenopausal women have the ability to enhance the de novo biosynthesis of choline and most postmenopausal women receiving estrogen therapy require less dietary choline [3, 26]. However, it was found that about 40% of premenopausal women have an SNP in their PEMT gene (rs12325817), thus inhibiting the induction of PEMT via estrogen and increasing their dietary demand for choline [5, 13].

Lipid homeostasis in the liver strikes a fine balance between uptake and synthesis, as well as secretion and catabolism. This homeostatic equilibrium is disturbed in Pemt-/- mice, leading to a decrease in their ability to secrete VLDL particles and severe accumulation of triglycerides in the liver [41]. Some studies have shown that Pemt-/- mice are more prone to hepatic steatosis and spontaneous NASH due to their damaged PEMT pathway and liver VLDL assembly ability [23]. In addition, the expression of PEMT mRNA in the liver tissue of NASH mice was significantly lower than that of simple steatosis mice [40]. Other factors, such as reduced fatty acid oxidation in the liver, or increased fatty acid flow from diet or white adipose tissue to the liver, may also contribute to the development of liver steatosis in Pemt-/- mice to some extent. Therefore, increasing fatty acid oxidation can compensate for low VLDL-triglyceride secretion and prevent, or even reverse, the fatty liver in PEMT-deficient mice [41].

3.1.3 Oxidative Stress and Inflammation

Chronic impairment of lipid metabolism affects the balance of oxidants/antioxidants, influencing the functionality of metabolism-related organelles, leading to chronic endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS), and mitochondrial dysfunction. The interaction between ERS and oxidative stress plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD [42]. Disruption of mitochondria-associated membrane (MAM) integrity results in an imbalance in Ca2+ homeostasis, increasing ERS and oxidative stress [43]. Increased oxidative stress also activates hepatic cell stress pathways, leading to inflammation and fibrogenesis, contributing to the progression of NASH. As the ER is responsible for the synthesis, folding, transportation, and maturation of proteins, it participates in the synthesis of molecules such as cholesterol, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, and triglyceride, as well as calcium homeostasis and drug metabolism. Under ER stress, cells activate the unfolded protein response (UPR) to restore the homeostasis equilibrium caused by abnormal protein metabolism [44]. It has been confirmed that the significant reduction of the ratio of hepatic phosphatidylcholine to phosphatidylethanolamine (PC/PE) and lysophosphatidylcholine to phosphatidylethanomine is associated with the occurrence of NAFLD [44, 45]. PEMT deficiency reduced the ratio of PC/PE in the ER, inducing ER stress and making the mice more prone to fatty hepatitis induced by a high fat diet [33, 46].

3.1.4 Fibrosis/Cirrhosis (Activation and extracellular matrix (ECM) Accumulation)

Hepatocytes are subjected to sustained stress or injury, and the activation of macrophages, leading to activation of resident hepatic stellate cells into myofibroblasts, which resulting in the accumulation of extracellular matrix. This process ultimately leads to fibrosis, cirrhosis, and even progression to hepatocellular carcinoma [47]. Low dietary choline result in steatohepatitis, fibrosis, cirrhosis. Studies have shown that Exosomes derived from human adipose mesenchymal stem cells (hADMSCs-Exo) can promote choline uptake, reduce lipid accumulation, and restore abnormal choline metabolism, thereby helping to alleviate liver cell damage and fibrosis. On this basis, choline supplementation is supposed to exert a synergistic effect with hADMSCs-Exo in anti-hepatic fibrosis [48].

In summary, NAFLD includes a series of pathologies, ranging from nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL, commonly referred to as simple steatosis, defined as steatosis without any histological or biochemical damage) to NASH, characterized by steatosis, inflammation and hepatocyte damage (swelling), with or without cirrhosis. NAFL is generally considered as a benign disease, and NASH is a progressive disease. Patients with NASH are likely to develop advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, or even liver cancer (Fig. 4) [28, 49, 50].

Fig. 4.

The protective role of choline in the development of NAFLD. NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; PEMT, phosphatidylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine.

3.2 Dysregulation of Gut Microbiota and Occurrence of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

The gut microbiota is mainly composed of bacteria, viruses, fungi, etc. Although gut microbiota is individual specific and has high adaptability to change, it could still be affected by the host’s internal and external factors, such as the host’s genes, dietary habits, presence of antibiotics, and environmental changes [51]. An increasing library of data shows that certain diseases, such as irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, diabetes, allergy, cancer, obesity, autism, and liver disease are related to the gut microbiota dysregulation [52]. It has been reported that the liver steatosis phenotype is affected by gut microbiota [13, 28]. Gut microbiota can produce a variety of compounds, which play an important role in regulating the activities of distal organs, while the liver is in a strategic position downstream of the intestine. The anatomy of the liver ensures a close connection with the intestine, allowing enterogenous bacteria and their metabolites, nutrients, and other signals to be transmitted to the liver through the portal vein circulation. The liver also plays a crucial role in the defense of enterogenous substances (this is defined as the gut-liver axis). Gut microbiota, as a bioreactor, is equipped with the ability to engage in autonomous metabolism and immunity. It can regulate the response to external stimuli in the host environment, and the complexity of gut microbiota can indicate that it is an organ. Therefore, the concept of gut-liver axis must be complemented by gut-microbial-liver network, because of the complexity of microbial components and metabolic activities. Compounds related to gut microbiota, such as short chain fatty acids, bile acids, choline metabolites, indole derivatives, vitamins, polyamines, lipids, neurotransmitters and neuroactive compounds, and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis hormones have a variety of biological functions [29, 52].

Gut microbiota plays an important role in the pathophysiological process of cirrhosis. Enterogenous complications of cirrhosis, such as small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and increased intestinal permeability (intestinal leakage), can lead to systemic diseases related to bacterial or endotoxin translocation, such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, portal hypertension, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatic encephalopathy, and multiple organ failure [52]. SIBO refers to an increase in the number of anaerobes and/or aerobic bacteria in the small intestine, combined with the increase in intestinal permeability. SIBO is considered to be one of the pathogenesis of NAFLD/NASH. The intestinal epithelium is a natural barrier to prevent harmful bacteria and elements from entering the circulation, but the translocated microorganisms in SIBO may damage the tight connection between small intestinal epithelial cells, increase intestinal permeability, promote the flow of bacterial byproducts in the portal system, and absorb them from the liver, showing toxic activities in the liver. SIBO also induced the expression of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and the release of interleukin-8 (IL-8), which stimulated the inflammatory response [29, 53, 54].

Data from preclinical and clinical studies indicate that gut microbiota plays a key role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD, mainly through obesity tendency, metabolic changes (insulin resistance) and promoting liver inflammation [29, 45, 53]. In addition, many byproducts of bacteria, such as ethanol, may exhibit hepatotoxicity by stimulating Kupffer cells to produce and secrete nitric acid and cytokines [29, 51].

Obesity is a common feature of most metabolic diseases. Gut microbiota also plays a key role in the occurrence and development of obesity and obesity related metabolic diseases through the production of short chain fatty acids and other microbial metabolites that can regulate the energy gain of the host, or through the signal pathway that regulates the energy metabolism of the host. Studies have shown that gut microbiota can promote the absorption of monosaccharides in the intestine, accelerate the de novo synthesis of liver fat, inhibit the adipocytokines induced by fasting, and lead to the accumulation of triglycerides in adipocytes [53].

Insulin resistance is the basic pathophysiological process of metabolic diseases. In NAFLD, insulin resistance accelerates fatty accumulation in hepatocytes, leading to hepatocyte injury and inflammation. Inflammation and increased insulin resistance form a “vicious circle” that worsens the development of NAFLD [53, 54].

The term “metabolic endotoxemia” refers to a metabolic disease where there is an increased level of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in the blood. LPS is the active component of endotoxin, a part of the cell membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, and can bind to LPS binding protein and monocyte differentiation antigen CD14 receptor to form a complex that interacts with Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and activates inflammatory cascade reaction [29, 55]. Since both NAFLD and NASH are characterized by increased endotoxin levels, endotoxin is recognized as one component of the “second hit” in the “two hits” hypothesis [56, 57], triggering a cascade of pro-inflammatory cytokines, insulin resistance and triglyceride production, thus promoting the occurrence and development of NAFLD [29].

Any changes in gut microbiota, especially that of E. coli and other Enterobacteriaceae, will lead to gut microbiota dysregulation and increase the production of endogenous ethanol [51]. The increase in ethanol levels in obese patients and nonalcoholic NASH children suggests its role in the development of NAFLD/NASH. In addition, the expression of ethanol metabolism related enzymes such as ethanol dehydrogenase, catalase, and aldehyde dehydrogenase in NASH liver was significantly increased [29]. In addition to promoting inflammation, ethanol can also promote oxidative damage and hepatocyte necrosis because it can form reactive oxygen species and nitrogen. Ethanol can also increase the activity of the cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) enzyme, which catalyzes the oxidation of ethanol and releases free radicals, leading to oxidative damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, and liver inflammation. Endogenous ethanol can also inhibit the tricarboxylic acid cycle, thus increasing the level of acetic acid, thus promoting the accumulation of triglycerides in hepatocytes [51].

Gut microbiota also participate in choline metabolism by converting choline into toxic dimethylamine and trimethylamine. As shown in Fig. 5, dimethylamine and trimethylamine are transported to the liver and then oxidized by monooxygenase containing hepatoflavin to transform them into Trimetlylamine oxide (TMAO)), which leads to liver inflammation and damage [2, 53, 58, 59]. The increase of TMAO production is also the main cause of cardiovascular disease. Studies have shown that there is a positive correlation between circulating TMAO level and the occurrence and severity of NAFLD in Chinese adults in hospitals and communities [60]. Many studies have shown that TMAO is a gut microbiome-dependent metabolite of choline, which can lead to the occurrence and development of cardiovascular diseases [52, 60]. It has also been reported that TMAO can regulate glucose and lipid metabolism by reducing the total bile acid pool size, affecting lipid absorption and cholesterol homeostasis [60]. In addition, the content of dietary choline affects the composition and abundance of gut microbiota related to NAFLD [53]. The close relationship between gut microbiota and choline metabolism provides an important theoretical basis for targeted therapy of gut microbiota of NAFLD.

Fig. 5.

Metabolism of choline-TMAO. DMTE, dimethylamine; TMTE, trimethylamine; TMAO, Trimethylamine-N-oxidate.

3.3 Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
3.3.1 Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors Agonists

NAFLD patients are at an increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease and diabetes, so there is a growing need for new and better diagnostic methods and treatments [29, 61]. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, which can directly regulate target gene transcription by forming a heterodimer with the retinoid receptor X (RXR) and binding to the PPAR response element (PPRE) sequences in gene promoters [62]. There are three subtypes of PPAR: α, δ and γ, which are differentially expressed in different tissues [31, 63]. PPARα is widely expressed, mainly in cells that exhibit high levels of β-oxidation and mitochondrial activity, such as liver and cardiovascular tissue; PPARδ is mainly expressed in skeletal muscle, less in adipose tissue and skin; PPARγ is highly expressed in adipose tissue [64, 65]. PPAR agonists can improve liver steatosis and reduce the incidence of NAFLD by improving fatty acid β-oxidation and reducing the release of inflammatory cytokines, so they may be considered as a drug for the treatment of NAFLD [65, 66]. In early clinical trials in rodents and humans, PPAR agonists have been shown to ameliorate NASH by inducing the expression of β-oxidation related genes, reducing inflammation and oxidative stress (Table 1, Ref. [41, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74]) [31, 64].

Table 1.PPAR agonists in completed clinical trials for NAFLD/NASH.
Types Drugs Therapeutic effect References
PPARα agonists Fenofibrate Improved liver histology and biomarkers in NASH. [41]
Pemafibrate Reduced based liver stiffness in NASH and improved serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT). [67]
PPARγ agonist Pioglitazone Well-tolerated and effective in improving liver histology and reducing liver steatosis. [68, 69]
Rosiglitazone Significantly decreased liver steatosis. [70]
Lobeglitazone Reduced intrahepatic fat content, improved glycemic, liver, and lipid profiles in NAFLD. [71]
PPARα/δ dual agonist Elafibranor Improves insulin sensitivity, glucose homeostasis, and lipid metabolism and reduces inflammation. [72]
PPARα/γ dual agonist Saroglitazar Significantly improved ALT, insulin resistance, and atherogenic dyslipidemia in NAFLD/NASH. [73]
PPARα/δ/γ pan agonist Lanifibranor Simultaneously improved insulin resistance and improved the fibrotic response, and reduced hepatic inflammation in NASH. [72, 74]

PPAR, Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

PPARα plays a key role in regulating fatty acid uptake, β-oxidation, ketogenesis, bile acid synthesis, and triglyceride conversion. PPARα can induce the expression of many genes involved in fatty acid oxidation. PPARα plays both a role in metabolic regulation and an anti-inflammatory role through the complex regulation of nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) [31, 41, 65]. Fibrates, which belong to phenoxyaryl acids, are synthetic PPARα agonists for the treatment of dyslipidemia, which can reduce blood lipids, especially triglycerides. Fenofibrate and Ezetimibe, two types of fibrates, have shown drastically different results in studies. The former exhibited the ability to prevent and partially reverse NAFLD in Pemt-/- mice, while the latter can not reduce liver lipid accumulation, inflammation or fibrosis in these mice [41].

PPARδ is expressed primarily in skeletal muscles, but trace amounts are also found in adipose tissue and skin. It is involved in the regulation of mitochondrial metabolism and fatty acid beta oxidation. PPARδ is well expressed in hepatocytes as well as Kupffer cells and HSCs, suggesting that PPARδ may play a potential role in inflammation and fibrosis. However, studies have shown that PPARδ deficient mice are more susceptible to CCl4 induced liver fibrosis [31, 65].

PPARγ is highly expressed in adipose tissue and plays an important role in adipocyte differentiation, adipogenesis, and lipid metabolism [31, 65]. It has been reported that Nimesulide can inhibit obesity-related NAFLD and hepatic insulin resistance by regulating PPARγ [62]. Pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione antidiabetic drug and insulin sensitizer, is a synthetic PPARγ agonist that can bind to PPARγ to form a heterodimer with Retinoid X Recepto (RXR). This heterodimer can affect the transcription of genes related to glucose, lipid metabolism, and inflammation reduction [31, 64, 75]. Some studies have shown that Pioglitazone may reduce hepatic steatosis by enhancing cytoplasmic lipolysis, β-oxidation, and autophagy [62]. Receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3) is an important regulator of necroptosis, a form of programmed cell death [76]. It regulates the production of reactive oxygen species within mitochondria, controls the sequestration of metabolic enzymes and resident mitochondrial proteins, modulates the activity of mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes, influences mitochondrial biogenesis, and impacts fatty acid oxidation [77, 78]. Emerging studies suggest that manipulating RIPK3 expression can have a significant impact on NAFLD. Specifically, recent studies have demonstrated that Ripk3-/- mice can effectively target and enhance the expression of PPARγ, leading to a potential reversal of NAFLD progression [76, 78, 79]. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting RIPK3 in the treatment of NAFLD.

Although PPARα agonists seem promising in animal studies, they have not been very effective in clinical trials. PPARδ agonists may also be promising, but the data from human trials are very limited. PPARγ agonists are more successful in improving histological results, including fibrosis in clinical trials. However, the widespread use of thiazolidinediones is limited by its side effects such as weight gain, edema, bone loss, bladder cancer, and increased risk of cardiovascular complications. The utilization of agonists that activate multiple PPARs has also yielded promising outcomes, but it is important to note that the administration of dual or pan agonists has been associated with certain side effects [31, 50, 74, 75].

Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is another kind of nuclear receptor and highly expressed in both hepatocytes and intestinal enterocytes where it controls all aspects of bile acid metabolism. It is endogenously activated by bile acids, which can improve insulin sensitivity and show direct anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrosis effects in NASH mouse model and human tissues [80]. These compounds are FXR agonists, whose prototype is Obeticholic Acid (OCA), which can improve insulin resistance [81]. The GLS1-subtype of glutaminase was enhanced in both NASH clinical biopsy and preclinical mouse models. Since GLS1 silencing significantly reduced steatosis and oxidative stress through complex metabolic reprogramming (including increased VLDL output), this suggests that GLS1 may be an effective target for the treatment of NASH [23]. Recently, a benzimidazole derivative has been designed that possess FXR/PPARγ dual-partial agonist activity and shares the ability to decrease the phosphorylation of PPARγ-Ser273 mediated by cyclin-dependent kinase 5, as well as exhibiting metabolic stability in mouse liver microsomal assays [82]. Therefore, this analog would be a viable candidate drug for the treatment of NAFLD.

3.3.2 Targeting Gut Microbiota for the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Since gut microbiota plays a key role in the occurrence and development of NAFLD, gut microbiota has the potential to be the target for the treatment of NAFLD. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics have demonstrated their therapeutic potential in modulating the microbiota composition and promoting microbial equilibrium [83]. Recent studies showed that gut microbiota also can be regulated by antibiotics such as Vancomycin [84] and some Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) formulas such as Qushi Huayu Decoction (QHD) [85].

Probiotics was defined as “living microorganism” by the World Health Organization in 2001. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are the main probiotics, also called traditional probiotics, which are considered to be harmless to the human body [52, 53]. Only in recent times have researchers begun to comprehend the mechanisms of their functionality by employing rodent models. In animal models with diet-induced NAFLD, the administration of oral probiotics containing Lactobacillus fermentum has demonstrated the ability to decrease hepatic lipid accumulation, oxidative stress, and the expression of inflammatory markers (such as Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-18 (IL-18)), thus provide protection against NAFLD-Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by releasing the anti-tumor metabolite acetate through the gut-liver axis [86, 87]. Furthermore, the combination of Bifidobacterium infantis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, and Bacillus cereus has been shown to ameliorate hepatic lipid accumulation, inflammatory infiltration, liver enzyme levels, serum LPS, and inflammatory cytokine levels in an animal model of high-fat and high-glucose diet (HFD) [88]. Two meta-analyses, included patients with NAFLD, demonstrated that probiotics reduced body mass index, liver enzyme levels, inflammation, and improved symptoms of diabetes and dyslipidemia [89, 90]. They have revealed limited efficacy of probiotics in positively modulating human metabolism. The immunomodulatory effect of probiotics may be beneficial to the treatment of NAFLD, which can be used as an adjuvant therapy for NAFLD patients [91]. The mechanism of action is the increase of fatty acid formation, the change of colon pH, the induction of growth factors, and the change of gut microbiota, the inhibition of anti-colonization bacteria adhesion, immune regulation, the increase of phagocyte activity, the increase of IgA secretion, and the regulation of lymphocyte function [29, 52]. With the remarkable progress in genetic engineering technology, a novel generation of probiotics (NGPs) is currently under development and being applied in the field of NAFLD treatment research (Table 2, Ref. [92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100]) [101].

Table 2.NGPs shown in animal experiments to ameliorate NAFLD.
Probiotic strains Treatment results References
A. muciniphila Reversed HFD-induced metabolic disturbances, improved lipid metabolism, and epigenetic regulation. [92, 93]
B. uniformis Reduced liver steatosis, serum cholestero and triglyceride, and increased small adipocyte numbers. [94, 95]
B. xylanisolvens Delayed progression of NAFLD to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and improved nicotine-associated NAFLD. [96]
E. hallii Improved insulin sensitivity, increased energy expenditure, improved metabolic phenotype. [97]
F. prausnitzii Improved hepatic health, decreased adipose tissue inflammation, enhanced mitochondrial respiration. [98]
Propionibacterium Reduced significantly TNF-α and IL-6 levels after combined with other probiotics. [99]
Clostridia Helped T-cell expansion and differentiation, and reduced intestinal inflammation in adult mice. [100]

NGPs, novel generation of probiotics; HFD, high-glucose diet; TNF-α, Tumor necrosis factor-α; IL-6, Interleukin-6.

In addition, synergistic effects have been observed in the combination of probiotics and chemicals such as metformin in NASH treatment and statins in NAFLD treatment, which highlights the great potential of probiotics alone or in combination with other drugs [71]. However, the clinical efficacy of probiotics still needs to be further validated in well-designed and larger-scale studies.

Prebiotics are a class of non-digestible food ingredients that selectively alter the growth and/or activity of bacteria in the colon [102]. They selectively stimulate “good” bacteria in the colon and inhibit the growth and/or activity of “bad” bacteria [103]. Oligosaccharides such as fructans and galactans are as examples of prebiotics for humans, which promote the proliferation of Bifidobacteria [103]. There is evidence that prebiotic supplements can prevent the development of NAFLD in both experimental and clinical studies. The combination of prebiotics and natural ingredients will produce greater benefits than prebiotics themselves [30]. For example, Isomaltooligosaccharides (IMOs) combined with lycopene (an antioxidant) can prevent high-fat diet induced weight gain in NAFLD mice, enhance fat mobilization in adipose tissue, and improve insulin resistance and metabolic endotoxemia [52].

The combination of probiotics and prebiotics is called synbiotics [29, 52, 53]. Synbiotics usually benefit by selectively stimulating the growth of healthy bacteria and/or activating their metabolism. Synbiotics have shown a variety of benefits in metabolic diseases, such as improving insulin resistance, blood glucose control and inflammatory cytokine synthesis. Synbiotic therapy showed improvements in fasting blood glucose, triglycerides, and inflammatory cytokines in obese and lean NAFLD patients. Therefore, synbiotics is a promising method for the prevention or treatment of NAFLD targeted by gut microbiota. However, more clinical validation is needed [53].

Antibiotics are often used clinically, although their ability to disrupt the homeostasis of gut microbes is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, the short-term use of antibiotics will have a long-term impact on host metabolism; on the other hand, the use of some antibiotics can improve the disease. Compared with antibiotics, some components of Chinese herbal medicine have a greater prospect of regulating gut microbiota with less side effects. Berberine is a typical component of Chinese herbal medicine, which has strong antibacterial activity, especially for intestinal bacteria, because berberine is difficult to be absorbed in the intestinal tract. At present, more and more evidences confirm that berberine has therapeutic effects on metabolic diseases, including obesity, NAFLD, and type Ⅱ diabetes (T2D), by regulating gut microbiota [53].

4. The Relationship between Choline Metabolism and Gut Microbiota

Choline and betaine can be metabolized by gut microbiota to form trimethylamine (TMA), which is further oxidized to trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) in the liver. Studies have found that TMAO can enhance the anti-tumor immune response in pancreatic cancer. Intraperitoneal administration of TMAO or oral supplementation of choline can suppress Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) growth, by activating tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and effector T cells, and promoting the type I interferon (IFN) pathway in the tumor microenvironment. Combining TMAO with Immune Checkpoint Blockade (ICB) in a PDAC mouse model significantly reduced tumor burden. This indicates that the gut microbiota metabolic product TMAO can act as a driving factor for anti-tumor immunity and lays the foundation for potential therapeutic strategies targeting TMAO [104]. However, in colon cancer, it has been found that TMAO promotes tumor growth by upregulating vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) expression [105].

5. The Relationship between Choline Metabolism and the Immune System

With the rapid development of immune therapy in tumors, it has been found that tumor metabolism plays an important role in immune suppression and the immune microenvironment [106, 107]. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that two metabolism-related genes, choline kinase beta (CHKB) and Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), were upregulated in colon cancer. The high-risk group had worse prognosis, and there was a significant difference in immune cell distribution between the two groups, with increased expression of CD8+ T cells and Treg cells in the high-risk group, while the expression of activated dendritic cells was higher in the low-risk group, suggesting that the high-risk group may benefit more from immune therapy [108]. In the INSPIRE basket trial, patients with advanced solid tumors treated with pembrolizumab had a more significant survival benefit if their serum choline levels were higher [109]. Pacheco-Torres et al. [110] investigated the role of Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) in cancer cell metabolism reprogramming and found a negative correlation between Chk-α and PD-L1 in triple-negative breast cancer and pancreatic cancer cell lines. After Chk-α was downregulated, PD-L1 expression increased, and after PD-L1 was downregulated, Chk-α expression increased. Both were regulated by Cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and transforming growth factor-β(TGF-β), indicating that PD-L1 regulates metabolism through Chk-α, Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and TGF-β. These results provide new insights into the rational design of combination therapies targeting immune checkpoints and cancer metabolism [110]. In the analysis of 360 patients with triple-negative breast cancer, it was found that the Clostridiales genus and the related metabolite TMAO were more abundant in tumors with an activated immune microenvironment. Patients with higher plasma TMAO achieved better responses to immunotherapy. Mechanistically, TMAO induced necroptosis in tumor cells by activating the endoplasmic reticulum stress protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) and thus enhanced CD8+ T cell-mediated antitumor immunity in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in vivo. This study suggests that microbial metabolites may represent a novel therapeutic strategy to promote the efficacy of immunotherapy in TNBC [111].

In addition, Tumor microenvironment (TME) can affect choline metabolism [9]. TME has complex components, including all kinds of non-tumor cells and non-cellular substances. Immune cells are the key components of TME. Metabolites in TME, such as fatty acids and glucose, can regulate the metabolism, phenotype and function of immune cells. These affected immune cells can, in turn, significantly affect the adjacent tumor cells [112]. Studies have shown that 27-hydroxycholesterol, a cholesterol metabolite, promotes breast cancer metastasis by acting on immune cells [56]. Metabolic reprogramming is necessary for tumor cells to maintain growth and survival in adverse microenvironment. In a study on choline metabolism of breast epithelial cells cultured in vitro, it was found, for the first time, that the total amount of phospholipid metabolites containing choline increased with the transformation from normal cells to tumor cells. In addition, the cultured malignant breast epithelial cells absorbed and/or metabolized more choline than the normal cells with the same growth rate. It can be inferred that the malignant transformation of breast tissue is related to abnormal choline metabolism [57].

6. Choline Metabolism And Cancer
6.1 Key Enzymes Involved in Choline Metabolism

The molecular mechanism of abnormal choline metabolism is the change of choline kinase-α, ethanolamine kinase-α, phosphatidylcholine specific phospholipases C and D, glycerophosphocholine, phosphodiesterase, and several choline transporters [113, 114]. The end result of these enzymatic changes is an increase in phosphocholine and a relative decrease in glycerophosphocholine in some cancers [4, 9, 113, 115].

6.1.1 Transporters

As a polar compound, choline can only enter cells through transporters on the cell membrane. Many transporter systems and enzyme networks are involved in phosphatidylcholine metabolism, but they are often dysregulated in cancer cells. Increased transport of extracellular free choline into cancer cells is considered a major cause of choline phenotype changes in cancer cells, as this may be the limiting step in phosphatidylcholine formation in some cases. There are four different types of choline transporters related to cancer, classified according to their affinity: (a) high-affinity choline transporters (CHTs); (b) choline transporter-like proteins (CTLs); (c) organic cation transporter (OCTs); (d) organic cation/carnitine transporters (OCTNs). The expression levels of each transporter subtype are increased in cancer cells [9, 116]. Choline transport mediated by CTL1 is considered a fundamental function in phospholipid synthesis, and inhibiting this choline uptake function can induce cell apoptosis. CTL1 is upregulated in various malignant tumors, including central nervous system, breast cancer, prostate cancer, melanoma, kidney cancer, lung cancer, colon cancer, and pancreatic cancer. High expression of CTL1 and CTL2 mRNA was observed in the MIA PaCa-2 pancreatic cancer cell line, and inhibiting CTL1 function resulted in cell apoptosis. CTL1 inhibitors Amb4269951 and Amb4269675 significantly inhibited tumor growth in a mouse xenograft model, indicating that CTL1 is a target molecule for the treatment of pancreatic cancer [117]. Human lung adenocarcinoma tissue highly overexpresses CTL1, and partially overexpresses organic cation transporters 3 (OCT3). In the NCI-H69 cell line, the increase in choline uptake depends mainly on CTL1, partially on OCT3, OCTN1, and OCTN2 [118].

6.1.2 Choline Kinase

Choline kinase (Chk) is the first enzyme in the choline metabolism pathway, which converts choline to PC. Chk was first discovered in 1953. There are three subtypes of ChK in mammalian cells, Chk-α1, Chk-α2, and Chk-β, encoded by two different genes: choline kinase alpha (CHKA) and CHKB. However, only ChK-α plays an important role in maintaining the PC biosynthesis required for tumor cells, and ChK-β alone cannot compensate for this activity [119]. In addition to its metabolic function, Chk-α has been shown to be highly expressed in many tumors and is closely related to the occurrence, development, and invasion and metastasis of tumors. It has become a promising molecular target for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer [9, 116]. In ovarian cancer, Dehydrogenase/reductase member 2 (DHRS2) downregulates CHKα protein expression, leading to the inhibition of the protein Kinase B, PKB (AKT) signaling pathway and choline metabolism pathway activity, ultimately inhibiting the proliferation and invasion and metastasis of ovarian cancer [120]. In breast cancer cells, small interfering RNA (siRNA) or short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting Chk-α can significantly reduce breast cancer cell proliferation by downregulating Chk-α mRNA expression [24]. In prostate cancer, high expression of CHKα not only plays a role in kinase function leading to abnormal choline metabolism, but also serves as a molecular partner of androgen receptor (AR), promoting the stability of AR, enhancing the AR signal in cells, and promoting prostate cancer proliferation. However, after knocking out CHKα, AR signal transduction is inhibited, and prostate cancer proliferation and invasion are ultimately suppressed, suggesting that targeted therapy for CHKα may improve the treatment of advanced prostate cancer [121]. The expression of CHKα is upregulated in breast cancer cells, and inhibiting Chk has strong anti-tumor activity against human breast cancer xenografts in vivo [122].

6.1.3 Phospholipase C and Phospholipase D

Tumor development and metastasis involve epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT). Some studies have shown that inhibition of phosphatidylcholine specific phospholipase C (PC-PLC) can lead to the loss of mesenchymal properties of metastatic breast cancer cells, indicating that PC-PLC plays an important role in the molecular pathway of maintaining mesenchymal like phenotype of metastatic breast cancer cells. Inactivation of PC-PLC may be a means to promote the differentiation of breast cancer cells and improve the effect of anti-tumor therapy [68]. Phospholipase D (PLD) was first discovered in plants in 1947 [123]. PLD is an enzyme belonging to the phospholipase superfamily, and the main subtypes in human cells are PLD1 and PLD2. PLD can hydrolyze phosphatidylcholine into phosphatidic acid and choline. The activity of PLD is significantly increased in tumor tissues and cells, including colorectal cancer, breast cancer, stomach cancer, thyroid cancer, brain cancer, and renal cancer, indicating that it may play a key role in the progression of cancer [124].

6.2 Regulatory Pathways of Choline Metabolism

In addition, the promoter sequence of Chk-α contains hypoxia response elements, which may bind to hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-α). In hypoxic environments such as tumors, HIF-1α binding enhances overexpression of the Ch-k-α gene [125]. Phosphorylcholine participates in the malignant transformation of tumors such as breast cancer, lung cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, neuroblastoma, hepatolymphoma, and meningioma through the RAS oncogene [24].

6.3 Detection of Choline Metabolites in Cancer and its Clinical Application

Phosphocholine, glycerophosphocholine, and free choline are known as total choline compounds (tCho) [8, 116, 126], also known as choline phenotypes. Elevated levels of phosphocholine and total choline compounds have been observed in most cancers, including breast, ovarian, prostate, cervical, brain and endometrial cancers, which are characteristic of choline metabolites in cancer [127, 128, 129]. Currently, abnormal choline metabolism has been used as an endogenous biomarker for cancer [113]. Non-invasive imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and high-resolution multinuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) can detect these changes in choline metabolism, and the choline phenotype is being used for tumor radio diagnosis, monitoring and prognosis, as well as the development of new therapies [9, 127, 130].

6.3.1 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a nuclear medicine modality that offers excellent sensitivity and the potential to provide quantitative information on biochemical processes within tissues or specific target macromolecules in vivo. PET in combination with computed tomography (PET/CT) radiocholine (labeled 11C or 18F) has emerged as a crucial tool in cancer imaging, allowing for the identification and characterization of areas with abnormal metabolic activity in cancer cells [131, 132, 133]. Radiocholine and f-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET, play a crucial role in cancer diagnosis, staging, and treatment monitoring. For example, Radiocholine exploits the increased uptake of choline by malignant cells due to upregulated choline kinase, leading to elevated phosphatidylcholine formation [20, 24, 116]. This change in metabolism has been observed in various cancers, including colon [9], breast [68], liver [6], ovarian [130], and prostate cancers [134]. On the other hand, FDG PET, which visualizes glucose metabolism in cancer cells, is widely used for cancer detection and staging, aiding in determining the extent of spread in newly diagnosed or recurrent cancers [135]. In addition, clinical trials have shown that metabolic imaging has a significant impact on patient management, improving treatment planning, image-guided techniques such as radiotherapy and stereotactic surgery, and monitoring tumor response to treatment [132].

6.3.2 High-Resolution Multinuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Currently, the evaluation of metabolic changes mainly relies on gas chromatography, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and high-resolution multinuclear MRS technology [136]. Since the 1990s, MRS has made a great contribution to the characterization of phosphocholine metabolism in tumor cells and tissues, making it a potential indicator for tumor progression and therapeutic response [9, 137, 138]. Meanwhile, high resolution MRS can detect the homeostasis level and flux of metabolites in the biosynthesis and catabolism of phosphatidylcholine [139]. In the past 20 years, MRS has been widely used to study biochemical pathways in intact tissues and extracts from living tissues [8]. MRS can be used for noninvasive monitoring of various biologically important molecules in cells and tissues, highlighting important details critical to cell biochemistry. Therefore, MRS provides a noninvasive method to monitor the metabolites that play a central role in multiple pathways, measures the rate of reactions in these pathways in vivo, and studies how to control these rates in order to provide a given metabolic precursor and its required cofactors [8, 19, 139].

MRS uses different non-radioactive isotopes, such as 1H, 31P, 13C. Proton (1H) has the highest nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) sensitivity, so its spectrum can reach the highest signal-to-noise ratio level [140]. The other core most widely used in metabolism research is 31P, which is a naturally occurring phosphorus isotope [141]. 31P MRS is a useful technique for quantitative analysis of phosphorus in cells, tissues, and their extracts [138, 141]. Although the sensitivity of 31P MRS is lower than that of 1H MRS, the chemical shift range of 31P MRS is larger, eliminating the need for pulse sequences to suppress strong solvent signal [19]. 13C labeling is particularly useful for studying specific metabolic pathways such as glycolysis and choline metabolism. However, the natural abundance of 13C isotope is only 1.1% and its intrinsic NMR sensitivity is much lower than that of 1H. Therefore, the 13C signal of biomolecules is very weak without isotope enrichment [8, 142]. One study used NMR techniques to analyze the concentrations of phosphatidylcholine metabolites, the activity of phosphocholine-producing enzymes and the uptake of methyl-14C-choline in human epithelial ovarian carcinoma cell lines (EOC) and compared them with normal or immortalized ovary epithelial cells (EONT). The quantitative analysis of phosphatidylcholine metabolites involved in 1H NMR total choline resonance (3.20–3.24 ppm) showed that the average value of phosphocholine in EOC cells was 3- to 8-fold higher than that of other phosphatidylcholine metabolites, acting as the main phosphatidylcholine metabolite, while the average value of glycerophosphocholine/phosphocholine decreased significantly. The activity of choline kinase in EOC cells was 12- to 24-fold higher than that in EONT cells. In EOC cells, the total activities of phosphatidylcholine specific phospholipase C and phospholipase D were also higher (about 5-fold), which indicated that the biosynthesis and catabolism of phosphatidylcholine might contribute to the accumulation of phosphocholine [143].

The advantage of MRS is that it does not need to separate and purify metabolites, thus avoiding the use of radioisotope substrates and fluorescence probe quenching [139]. Although it is limited by its low sensitivity, the application of ultra-high magnetic field intensity and the development of new technologies such as dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) can reduce ameliorate this problem [144]. In addition, MRS has a unique advantage-high spectral resolution, and it can simultaneously detect and quantify the consumption of exogenously added substrates and the formation of products [137, 145]. Therefore, MRS can not only measure the basic level of intracellular metabolites in the samples, but also determine the activities of key enzymes involved in the metabolic pathways analyzed. In this way, MRS can simultaneously measure the activities of different enzymes in the same cell sample and quickly evaluate the rearrangement of metabolic flux under different experimental conditions [8].

In another study, 1H MRS and 13C MRS techniques were used to analyze the differences in choline membrane metabolism between 13C-choline labeled breast cancer cells and normal human breast epithelial cells (HMECs). Compared with HMECs, the expressions of choline kinase and phospholipase C were significantly overexpressed in breast cancer cells, while the expression of hemolytic phospholipase 1, phospholipase A2, and phospholipase D were significantly down regulated. The change in the expression levels of these enzymes led to the increase in phosphocholine level in breast cancer cells [146]. Deuterium metabolic imaging (DMI) is an emerging technique that utilizes deuterium magnetic resonance spectroscopy (2H-MRS) to measure the metabolic flux of deuterium-labeled substrates for in vivo imaging of tissue metabolism and cell death [147]. DMI employs various deuterium-labeled substrates such as glucose, acetate, choline, and fumarate to investigate metabolic pathways [148]. The most widely used substrate is [6,6-2H2] glucose, which enables imaging of both glycolysis and oxidative metabolism. After injecting deuterium-labeled glucose into rats with a glioma model, radiation signals were first detected in the liver and then in the brain, showing higher lactate and lower Glx (the unresolved deuterium resonances of C4-labeled glutamate and glutamine) levels in the tumors than in the normal brain tissue [149]. This indicated that the tumors had more glycolysis and less oxidative metabolism. DMI can be utilized not only for MRS imaging but also for PET imaging. It offers several advantages over conventional labeling imaging, such as enabling simultaneous multi-substrate labeling [147, 149]. This capability greatly facilitates the investigation of metabolic, neurological, and cancer mechanisms.

6.4 Dysregulation of Choline Metabolism and Carcinogenesis
6.4.1 Choline Metabolism and Liver Cancer

Liver cancer (including hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world [149, 150]. In contrast to virally driven HCC, up to 50% of NAFLD-HCC occurs in patients without cirrhosis [50].

As mentioned above, choline is very important for liver health. Many mechanisms by which choline deficiency exacerbates steatosis to liver cancer have been found: abnormal phospholipid synthesis, defective lipoprotein secretion, DNA oxidative damage and lipid peroxidation caused by mitochondrial dysfunction, ER stress, loss of hepatocyte apoptosis response, and alteration of protein kinase C signal transduction caused by diacylglycerol accumulation, etc. [9, 114, 116, 129]. Choline is an important part of mitochondrial membrane. Mitochondrial dysfunction is the central mechanism of NAFLD-HCC. When choline levels are low, mitochondrial bioenergy and fatty acid β-oxidation will be negatively affected. Choline deficiency can change the composition of mitochondrial membrane and cause mitochondrial leakage. The cardiolipin in these mitochondrial membranes is then oxidized, resulting in a decrease in the membrane concentration of phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylcholine [22, 151]. This reduces mitochondrial membrane potential and, ultimately, leads to a decrease in respiratory chain complex Ⅰ activity [13, 32]. In addition, choline-deficient hepatocytes can produce excessive free radicals. The release of free radicals can cause the oxidation of nucleotides, form 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, inhibit the methylation of cytosine, and lead to DNA strand breakage and changes of epigenetic markers on DNA and histone [32, 152].

The death of hepatocytes in the absence of choline can also cause inflammatory responses, accompanied by neutrophil/macrophage mediated production of reactive oxygen species and nitrogen [13, 153]. Studies have found that there is a link between choline metabolism and macrophage inflammation [154, 155]. Pro-inflammatory polarization increases choline uptake and phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis, thus promoting macrophages to respond appropriately to immune stimulation [155]. The increase of choline uptake provides the necessary amount of phosphatidylcholine for the synthesis of cell membrane (organelle membrane and plasma membrane), which is conducive to the packaging and secretion of cytokines [115]. In addition, regulation of phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis can reprogram the immune response in primary macrophages [24, 151].

As mentioned above, choline is involved in methyl metabolism and can be used as a donor of methyl. Since there are epigenetic mechanisms that rely on DNA or histome methylation to alter gene expression, choline also plays a role in epigenetic regulation. A choline-methyl deficient diet resulted in a decrease in S-adenosylmethionine concentration and an increase in S-adenosylhomocysteine concentration in the liver of male rats and mice [3]. A simultaneously low concentration of S-adenosylmethionine and high concentration of S-adenosylhomocysteine inhibit the activity of methyltransferase. As S-adenosylhomocysteine has a high affinity for DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), it competes with S-adenosylmethionine to inhibit DNMTs enzyme activity. Thus, choline-methyl deficiency leads to decreased DNA methylation at many sites, including oncogene c-myc, but also increases methylation of other cytokines (including some tumor suppressor genes, such as p53). Many tumor suppressor genes are epigenetically regulated, including cell cycle regulation genes (p15 and p16), apoptosis genes (DAPK and APAF-1), cell adhesion genes (CDH1 and CDH3), and DNA repair genes (BRCA1 and hMLH) [45, 152]. Histone methylation was also affected by a diet deficient in methyl. Choline-methyl deficiency diet resulted in a decrease in histone H3-lysine 9-trimethylation (H3K9me3) and histone H4-lysine 20 trimethylation (H4K20me3) in the liver [156].

In addition, gut microbiota dysregulation is also involved in the development of NAFLD-related liver cirrhosis and liver cancer. Dysregulation of gut microbiota leads to a surge in inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-8, and the activation of TLR-4 and TLR-9, which leads to the production of IL-1β by Kupffer cells. IL-1β promotes lipid accumulation and cell death in hepatocytes, causes steatosis and inflammation, and stimulates HSCs to produce fibrosis mediators, thus promoting liver fibrosis. Gut microbiota dysregulation can also promote the occurrence and development of NAFLD-related liver cancer by changing bile acid metabolism. Changes in gut microbiota can lead to high levels of deoxycholic acid (DCA), which leads to senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) in HSCs and results in the secretion of various inflammatory and tumor promoting factors in the liver, thus promoting the development of liver cancer [28].

Compared with normal liver cells, hepatoma cells have drastically different epigenomes-hepatoma cells have gene specific DNA hypermethylation or hypomethylation, histone epigenetic markers changes, abnormal expression of DNA methyltransferase and histone modifying enzyme genes. Phosphatidylcholine is the precursor of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), which regulates cell proliferation, differentiation, morphogenesis, and prevents apoptosis through G-protein-coupled transmembrane receptors. The genes encoding LPA signal receptors are regulated by epigenetic mechanisms. Abnormal methylation of LPA1 receptor gene was observed in rodents fed a choline-methionine deficient diet, with a pattern similar to that described in liver cancer [32].

Studies have shown that when the key gene in choline metabolism (betaine homocysteine methyltransferase gene BHMT) is deleted in mice, these mice will develop liver cancer [156]. It was also reported that the level of choline kinase-α (Chk-α) mRNA in HCC tissues was higher than that in non-tumor tissues and an amplification of the Chk-α gene site increased the expression of Chk-α. The tumor with high Chk-α expression has a higher invasive phenotype, resulting in a shorter survival time for the tumor patients. Moreover, Chk-α is essential for the physical interaction between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2), which is necessary for hepatoma cells to form metastatic xenograft tumors in mice and to develop resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Therefore, stable and high expression of Chk-α in hepatoma cell lines is positively correlated with higher migration and invasion levels, as well as the ability to resist EGFR inhibitors and form metastatic tumors in mice [157] (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.

The role of choline in the development of liver cancer. HCC, Hepatocellular carcinoma; ER, endoplasmic reticulum.

6.4.2 Choline Metabolism and other Cancers

In addition to liver cancer, abnormal choline metabolism has been found in a variety of cancers [9]. Choline phosphate is involved in the malignant transformation of breast cancer, lung cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, neuroblastoma, liver lymphoma, meningioma, and other tumors through the RAS oncogene [22]. Many studies have shown that the expression and activity of lipases (including fatty acid synthase and choline kinase) are up-regulated in all stages of prostate cancer, and are associated with poor prognosis and survival rate. The cell membrane composition of normal cells and malignant cells is different-the relative content of choline phospholipid, which is mainly distributed in the outer lobe of cell membrane, decreased in all malignant tumors [12].

6.4.3 The Application of Choline Metabolism in Cancer Treatment

Choline kinase inhibitors can be used as a new type of antiproliferative and anticancer drugs [158]. Several kinds of choline kinase inhibitors have been developed: Hemicholinium-3 (HC-3) is a competitive inhibitor with similar structure of Chk-α, which can block the transport of choline and is very effective in vitro, but has high toxicity in vivo; MN-58b is a less toxic HC-3 derivative, which can inhibit cell growth in animal models; RSM-932A, a Chk-α inhibitor, has been selected for further clinical development due to its strong anticancer activity in vivo and no toxicity at effective dose; TCD-717, another Chk-α inhibitor, has recently completed phase Ⅰ clinical trials in patients with advanced solid tumors. In breast and liver cancer cell lines, the Chk-α inhibitor PL48 not only inhibits the activity and expression of Chkα1, but also inhibits the uptake of choline by the CTL1 transporter, indicating that PL48 is a promising candidate drug that can be further clinically evaluated as a potential anti-cancer drug [159]. However, there are still no Chk-α inhibitors available for clinical use at the moment [130, 160].

Another study found that the expression of choline kinase is partly dependent on the function of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). COX-2 silencing can significantly reduce the levels of phosphocholine and tCho, significantly increase the lipid levels, and form lipid droplets in human breast cancer cells. Moreover, COX-2 silencing can transform the parental cell metabolite mode into a less invasive cancer cell metabolite mode. Therefore, COX-2 targeted therapy can prevent tumor invasion and metastasis [160].

Tumor development and metastasis involve epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT). Some studies have shown that inhibition of phosphatidylcholine specific phospholipase C (PC-PLC) can lead to the loss of mesenchymal properties of metastatic breast cancer cells, indicating that PC-PLC plays an important role in the molecular pathway of maintaining mesenchymal like phenotype of metastatic breast cancer cells. Inactivation of PC-PLC may be a means to promote the differentiation of breast cancer cells and improve the effect of anti-tumor therapy [68].

7. Conclusions

Metabolites and enzymes in the choline metabolic cycle play a role in the development of NAFLD, including increased uptake of fatty acids, reduced mitochondrial fatty acid β-oxidation, increased de novo synthesis of fatty acids, and/or disruption of assembly and secretion of VLDL [23]. Currently, the study of gut microbiota aims to elucidate its role in the pathophysiology of NAFLD, with excessive energy acquisition, ethanol production, LPS-TLRs interaction, and changes in choline metabolism being the main mechanisms at play [29].

The current treatment options for NAFLD encompass lifestyle changes (e.g., healthy diet and increased exercise), drug therapy, surgery, and liver transplantation [53, 161]. However, the currently available noninvasive diagnostic tests lack specificity and accuracy. Furthermore, liver biopsy, which has been considered the gold standard for assessing liver injury, remains invasive and carries inherent risks [15, 161, 162].

There is compelling evidence that NAFLD imposes a significant clinical and economic burden, which is expected to further escalate [81, 163]. Ideally, pharmacological interventions targeting NAFLD should impede its progression and facilitate the reversal of liver injury. However, despite substantial investments made by the pharmaceutical industry in recent years, there is currently no approved treatment for NAFLD. Various drugs, such as FXR agonists, PPARα and PPARγ agonists, and chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) and CCR5 antagonists, have shown efficacy in NAFLD clinical trials based on either liver biopsy or noninvasive markers. Nevertheless, further trials are necessary to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of these drugs [53, 81]. Furthermore, while certain prevention or treatment techniques, including probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, antibiotics, and specific compounds found in Chinese herbal medicine, targeting the gut microbiota, have demonstrated therapeutic effects in some pharmacological experiments, they are mostly used as adjunctive therapies for NAFLD and require further clinical validation. Interestingly, vitamin E has demonstrated successful results in multiple experiments, leading to improved liver enzymes and histological regression of liver injury [164, 165]. The study found that vitamin E treatment resulted in NAFLD improvement in approximately half of the treated population. However, its use may elevate the risk of prostate cancer (particularly in older men) and hemorrhagic stroke. Moreover, long-term vitamin E supplementation may increase overall mortality rate, making the risks possibly outweigh the benefits [50, 161]. Drug combination therapy could potentially be a future option for NAFLD treatment; however, there is currently no data from long-term controlled trials supporting its use. Thus, weight loss and exercise remain the only effective treatments currently available, although compliance presents a challenge [23, 81, 161].

NAFLD patients may develop advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, or even liver cancer. Choline deficiency is involved in the pathogenesis of NAFLD-HCC, including abnormal phospholipid synthesis, defective lipoprotein secretion, mitochondrial dysfunction, ER stress, initiation of inflammatory reaction, loss of hepatocyte apoptosis, and changes of protein kinase C signal transduction caused by diacylglycerol accumulation. DNA oxidative damage and lipid peroxidation caused by mitochondrial dysfunction are the central mechanisms of NAFLD-HCC [13, 32]. Choline is additionally involved in epigenetic regulation [3, 32, 152], while dysregulation of the gut microbiota is implicated in NAFLD-related liver cirrhosis and liver cancer [28].

Besides liver cancer, choline metabolism is implicated in the development of various other cancers, such as breast cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, cervical cancer, brain cancer, and endometrial cancer [95, 96, 97]. Elevated levels of phosphocholine and total choline (tCho) are distinctive choline metabolites in cancer and are increasingly utilized as endogenous cancer biomarkers [95, 96, 97]. Moreover, enzymes like Chk-α, ethanolamine kinase-α, and phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipases C and D, among others, that induce substantial alterations in phosphocholine and tCho could serve as novel molecular targets for precise anticancer therapy [4, 9, 113, 115, 127]. Additionally, the heightened ratio of phosphocholine to glycerophosphocholine can serve as an indicator of cancer progression [126, 129, 146].

Choline kinase inhibitors, including HC-3, MN-58b, RSM-932A, and TCD-717, among others, are anticipated to emerge as novel anti-tumor therapeutics in the future. Nevertheless, there are currently no effective choline kinase inhibitors available for clinical use. Therefore, additional experimental and clinical validations are necessary to develop dependable choline kinase inhibitors [1, 126, 130].

In conclusion, choline metabolism plays a role in the pathogenesis of NAFLD and various cancers, including liver cancer, making it a viable target for future therapeutic interventions. At present, there are no effective therapeutic agents that specifically target choline metabolism for NAFLD and cancers in the clinical setting, necessitating further experimental and clinical validation.

Availability of Data and Materials

Not applicable.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, XC, WYQ, CX and RZC; methodology, XC, WYQ, XQM, LLR; writing—original draft preparation, XC, WYQ, CX and RZC; collecting literature, draw charts—MQF, SH; writing—review and editing, XC, MQF, SH, CX and RZC. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Acknowledgment

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
Sherriff JL, O’Sullivan TA, Properzi C, Oddo JL, Adams LA. Choline, Its Potential Role in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, and the Case for Human and Bacterial Genes. Advances in Nutrition. 2016; 7: 5–13.
[2]
Wiedeman AM, Barr SI, Green TJ, Xu Z, Innis SM, Kitts DD. Dietary Choline Intake: Current State of Knowledge Across the Life Cycle. Nutrients. 2018; 10: 1513.
[3]
Zeisel SH. Gene response elements, genetic polymorphisms and epigenetics influence the human dietary requirement for choline. IUBMB Life. 2007; 59: 380–387.
[4]
Ueland PM. Choline and betaine in health and disease. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. 2011; 34: 3–15.
[5]
Zeisel SH. Metabolic crosstalk between choline/1-carbon metabolism and energy homeostasis. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2013; 51: 467–475.
[6]
Zhou RF, Chen XL, Zhou ZG, Zhang YJ, Lan QY, Liao GC, et al. Higher dietary intakes of choline and betaine are associated with a lower risk of primary liver cancer: a case-control study. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7: 679.
[7]
Du YF, Luo WP, Lin FY, Lian ZQ, Mo XF, Yan B, et al. Dietary choline and betaine intake, choline-metabolising genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: a case-control study in China. The British Journal of Nutrition. 2016; 116: 961–968.
[8]
Iorio E, Ricci A, Pisanu ME, Bagnoli M, Podo F, Canevari S. Choline metabolic profiling by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2013; 1049: 255–270.
[9]
Glunde K, Bhujwalla ZM, Ronen SM. Choline metabolism in malignant transformation. Nature Reviews. Cancer. 2011; 11: 835–848.
[10]
Ridgway ND. The role of phosphatidylcholine and choline metabolites to cell proliferation and survival. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2013; 48: 20–38.
[11]
Mailloux RJ, Young A, Chalker J, Gardiner D, O’Brien M, Slade L, et al. Choline and dimethylglycine produce superoxide/hydrogen peroxide from the electron transport chain in liver mitochondria. FEBS Letters. 2016; 590: 4318–4328.
[12]
Cuccurullo V, Di Stasio GD, Evangelista L, Castoria G, Mansi L. Biochemical and Pathophysiological Premises to Positron Emission Tomography With Choline Radiotracers. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2017; 232: 270–275.
[13]
Corbin KD, Zeisel SH. Choline metabolism provides novel insights into nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its progression. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology. 2012; 28: 159–165.
[14]
Leermakers ETM, Moreira EM, Kiefte-de Jong JC, Darweesh SKL, Visser T, Voortman T, et al. Effects of choline on health across the life course: a systematic review. Nutrition Reviews. 2015; 73: 500–522.
[15]
Han P, Bidulescu A, Barber JR, Zeisel SH, Joshu CE, Prizment AE, et al. Dietary choline and betaine intakes and risk of total and lethal prostate cancer in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2019; 30: 343–354.
[16]
Youn J, Cho E, Lee JE. Association of choline and betaine levels with cancer incidence and survival: A meta-analysis. Clinical Nutrition. 2019; 38: 100–109.
[17]
Kennedy EP, Weiss SB. The function of cytidine coenzymes in the biosynthesis of phospholipides. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1956; 222: 193–214.
[18]
Cuadrado A, Carnero A, Dolfi F, Jiménez B, Lacal JC. Phosphorylcholine: a novel second messenger essential for mitogenic activity of growth factors. Oncogene. 1993; 8: 2959–2968.
[19]
Phyu SM, Tseng CC, Smith TAD. CDP-choline accumulation in breast and colorectal cancer cells treated with a GSK-3-targeting inhibitor. Magma. 2019; 32: 227–235.
[20]
Mori N, Wildes F, Kakkad S, Jacob D, Solaiyappan M, Glunde K, et al. Choline kinase-α protein and phosphatidylcholine but not phosphocholine are required for breast cancer cell survival. NMR in Biomedicine. 2015; 28: 1697–706.
[21]
Li Z, Agellon LB, Vance DE. Phosphatidylcholine homeostasis and liver failure. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005; 280: 37798–37802.
[22]
Janardhan S, Srivani P, Sastry GN. Choline kinase: an important target for cancer. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2006; 13: 1169–1186.
[23]
Simon J, Nuñez-García M, Fernández-Tussy P, Barbier-Torres L, Fernández-Ramos D, Gómez-Santos B, et al. Targeting Hepatic Glutaminase 1 Ameliorates Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis by Restoring Very-Low-Density Lipoprotein Triglyceride Assembly. Cell Metabolism. 2020; 31: 605–622.e10.
[24]
Snider SA, Margison KD, Ghorbani P, LeBlond ND, O’Dwyer C, Nunes JRC, et al. Choline transport links macrophage phospholipid metabolism and inflammation. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2018; 293: 11600–11611.
[25]
Ferreira-Vieira TH, Guimaraes IM, Silva FR, Ribeiro FM. Alzheimer’s disease: Targeting the Cholinergic System. Current Neuropharmacology. 2016; 14: 101–115.
[26]
Bekdash RA. Choline, the brain and neurodegeneration: insights from epigenetics. Frontiers in Bioscience (Landmark Edition). 2018; 23: 1113–1143.
[27]
Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016; 64: 73–84.
[28]
Chu H, Williams B, Schnabl B. Gut microbiota, fatty liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Research. 2018; 2: 43–51.
[29]
Gkolfakis P, Dimitriadis G, Triantafyllou K. Gut microbiota and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International. 2015; 14: 572–581.
[30]
Safari Z, Gérard P. The links between the gut microbiome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2019; 76: 1541–1558.
[31]
Liss KHH, Finck BN. PPARs and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Biochimie. 2017; 136: 65–74.
[32]
Mehedint MG, Zeisel SH. Choline’s role in maintaining liver function: new evidence for epigenetic mechanisms. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care. 2013; 16: 339–345.
[33]
Wan S, van der Veen JN, Bakala N’Goma JC, Nelson RC, Vance DE, Jacobs RL. Hepatic PEMT activity mediates liver health, weight gain, and insulin resistance. FASEB Journal. 2019; 33: 10986–10995.
[34]
Vance DE. Physiological roles of phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2013; 1831: 626–632.
[35]
Cheng M, Bhujwalla ZM, Glunde K. Targeting Phospholipid Metabolism in Cancer. Frontiers in Oncology. 2016; 6: 266.
[36]
Manne V, Handa P, Kowdley KV. Pathophysiology of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Clinics in Liver Disease. 2018; 22: 23–37.
[37]
Smallwood T, Allayee H, Bennett BJ. Choline metabolites: gene by diet interactions. Current Opinion in Lipidology. 2016; 27: 33–39.
[38]
Ikawa-Yoshida A, Matsuo S, Kato A, Ohmori Y, Higashida A, Kaneko E, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in a mouse model fed a choline-deficient, L-amino acid-defined, high-fat diet. International Journal of Experimental Pathology. 2017; 98: 221–233.
[39]
Sołtysik K, Ohsaki Y, Tatematsu T, Cheng J, Fujimoto T. Nuclear lipid droplets derive from a lipoprotein precursor and regulate phosphatidylcholine synthesis. Nature Communications. 2019; 10: 473.
[40]
Nakatsuka A, Matsuyama M, Yamaguchi S, Katayama A, Eguchi J, Murakami K, et al. Insufficiency of phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase is risk for lean non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6: 21721.
[41]
van der Veen JN, Lingrell S, Gao X, Takawale A, Kassiri Z, Vance DE, et al. Fenofibrate, but not ezetimibe, prevents fatty liver disease in mice lacking phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase. Journal of Lipid Research. 2017; 58: 656–667.
[42]
Arroyave-Ospina JC, Wu Z, Geng Y, Moshage H. Role of Oxidative Stress in the Pathogenesis of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Implications for Prevention and Therapy. Antioxidants. 2021; 10: 174.
[43]
Wang J, He W, Tsai PJ, Chen PH, Ye M, Guo J, et al. Mutual interaction between endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Lipids in Health and Disease. 2020; 19: 72.
[44]
Papadopoulos C, Tentes I, Anagnostopoulos K. Red Blood Cell Dysfunction in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Marker and Mediator of Molecular Mechanisms. Maedica. 2020; 15: 513–516.
[45]
Shama S, Jang H, Wang X, Zhang Y, Shahin NN, Motawi TK, et al. Phosphatidylethanolamines Are Associated with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) in Obese Adults and Induce Liver Cell Metabolic Perturbations and Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24: 1034.
[46]
Gao X, van der Veen JN, Vance JE, Thiesen A, Vance DE, Jacobs RL. Lack of phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase alters hepatic phospholipid composition and induces endoplasmic reticulum stress. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2015; 1852: 2689–2699.
[47]
Tsuchida T, Friedman SL. Mechanisms of hepatic stellate cell activation. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2017; 14: 397–411.
[48]
Zhang Z, Shang J, Yang Q, Dai Z, Liang Y, Lai C, et al. Exosomes derived from human adipose mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate hepatic fibrosis by inhibiting PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and remodeling choline metabolism. Journal of Nanobiotechnology. 2023; 21: 29.
[49]
Brown GT, Kleiner DE. Histopathology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental. 2016; 65: 1080–1086.
[50]
Foerster F, Gairing SJ, Müller L, Galle PR. NAFLD-driven HCC: Safety and efficacy of current and emerging treatment options. Journal of Hepatology. 2022; 76: 446–457.
[51]
Aragonès G, González-García S, Aguilar C, Richart C, Auguet T. Gut Microbiota-Derived Mediators as Potential Markers in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. BioMed Research International. 2019; 2019: 8507583.
[52]
Usami M, Miyoshi M, Yamashita H. Gut microbiota and host metabolism in liver cirrhosis. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2015; 21: 11597–11608.
[53]
Ma J, Zhou Q, Li H. Gut Microbiota and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Insights on Mechanisms and Therapy. Nutrients. 2017; 9: 1124.
[54]
Han R, Ma J, Li H. Mechanistic and therapeutic advances in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by targeting the gut microbiota. Frontiers of Medicine. 2018; 12: 645–657.
[55]
Suk KT, Kim DJ. Gut microbiota: novel therapeutic target for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2019; 13: 193–204.
[56]
Baek AE, Yu YRA, He S, Wardell SE, Chang CY, Kwon S, et al. The cholesterol metabolite 27 hydroxycholesterol facilitates breast cancer metastasis through its actions on immune cells. Nature Communications. 2017; 8: 864.
[57]
Aboagye EO, Bhujwalla ZM. Malignant transformation alters membrane choline phospholipid metabolism of human mammary epithelial cells. Cancer Research. 1999; 59: 80–84.
[58]
Wang Z, Klipfell E, Bennett BJ, Koeth R, Levison BS, Dugar B, et al. Gut flora metabolism of phosphatidylcholine promotes cardiovascular disease. Nature. 2011; 472: 57–63.
[59]
Bennett BJ, de Aguiar Vallim TQ, Wang Z, Shih DM, Meng Y, Gregory J, et al. Trimethylamine-N-oxide, a metabolite associated with atherosclerosis, exhibits complex genetic and dietary regulation. Cell Metabolism. 2013; 17: 49–60.
[60]
Chen YM, Liu Y, Zhou RF, Chen XL, Wang C, Tan XY, et al. Associations of gut-flora-dependent metabolite trimethylamine-N-oxide, betaine and choline with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in adults. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6: 19076.
[61]
Adams LA, Anstee QM, Tilg H, Targher G. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and its relationship with cardiovascular disease and other extrahepatic diseases. Gut. 2017; 66: 1138–1153.
[62]
Tsujimoto S, Kishina M, Koda M, Yamamoto Y, Tanaka K, Harada Y, et al. Nimesulide, a cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitor, suppresses obesity-related non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatic insulin resistance through the regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ. International Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2016; 38: 721–728.
[63]
Ahmed W, Ziouzenkova O, Brown J, Devchand P, Francis S, Kadakia M, et al. PPARs and their metabolic modulation: new mechanisms for transcriptional regulation? Journal of Internal Medicine. 2007; 262: 184–198.
[64]
Hsiao PJ, Chiou HYC, Jiang HJ, Lee MY, Hsieh TJ, Kuo KK. Pioglitazone Enhances Cytosolic Lipolysis, β-oxidation and Autophagy to Ameliorate Hepatic Steatosis. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7: 9030.
[65]
Silva AKS, Peixoto CA. Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease inflammation. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2018; 75: 2951–2961.
[66]
Nagasawa T, Inada Y, Nakano S, Tamura T, Takahashi T, Maruyama K, et al. Effects of bezafibrate, PPAR pan-agonist, and GW501516, PPARdelta agonist, on development of steatohepatitis in mice fed a methionine- and choline-deficient diet. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2006; 536: 182–191.
[67]
Honda A, Kamata S, Akahane M, Machida Y, Uchii K, Shiiyama Y, et al. Functional and Structural Insights into Human PPARα/δ/γ Subtype Selectivity of Bezafibrate, Fenofibric Acid, and Pemafibrate. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23: 4726.
[68]
Abalsamo L, Spadaro F, Bozzuto G, Paris L, Cecchetti S, Lugini L, et al. Inhibition of phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C results in loss of mesenchymal traits in metastatic breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Research. 2012; 14: R50.
[69]
Huang JF, Dai CY, Huang CF, Tsai PC, Yeh ML, Hsu PY, et al. First-in-Asian double-blind randomized trial to assess the efficacy and safety of insulin sensitizer in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients. Hepatology International. 2021; 15: 1136–1147.
[70]
Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Bernhardt C, Giral P, Halbron M, Lenaour G, et al. Long-term efficacy of rosiglitazone in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: results of the fatty liver improvement by rosiglitazone therapy (FLIRT 2) extension trial. Hepatology. 2010; 51: 445–453.
[71]
Lee YH, Kim JH, Kim SR, Jin HY, Rhee EJ, Cho YM, et al. Lobeglitazone, a Novel Thiazolidinedione, Improves Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Type 2 Diabetes: Its Efficacy and Predictive Factors Related to Responsiveness. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2017; 32: 60–69.
[72]
Ratziu V, Harrison SA, Francque S, Bedossa P, Lehert P, Serfaty L, et al. Elafibranor, an Agonist of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-α and -δ, Induces Resolution of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Without Fibrosis Worsening. Gastroenterology. 2016; 150: 1147–1159.e5.
[73]
Gawrieh S, Noureddin M, Loo N, Mohseni R, Awasty V, Cusi K, et al. Saroglitazar, a PPAR-α/γ Agonist, for Treatment of NAFLD: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Phase 2 Trial. Hepatology. 2021; 74: 1809–1824.
[74]
Francque SM, Bedossa P, Ratziu V, Anstee QM, Bugianesi E, Sanyal AJ, et al. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Pan-PPAR Agonist Lanifibranor in NASH. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2021; 385: 1547–1558.
[75]
Galimberti D, Scarpini E. Pioglitazone for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs. 2017; 26: 97–101.
[76]
Afonso MB, Rodrigues PM, Mateus-Pinheiro M, Simão AL, Gaspar MM, Majdi A, et al. RIPK3 acts as a lipid metabolism regulator contributing to inflammation and carcinogenesis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gut. 2021; 70: 2359–2372.
[77]
Islam T, Afonso MB, Rodrigues CMP. The role of RIPK3 in liver mitochondria bioenergetics and function. European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2022; 52: e13648.
[78]
Mohammed S, Thadathil N, Ohene-Marfo P, Tran AL, Van Der Veldt M, Georgescu C, et al. Absence of Either Ripk3 or Mlkl Reduces Incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Independent of Liver Fibrosis. Molecular Cancer Research. 2023; 21: 933–946.
[79]
Afonso MB, Islam T, Magusto J, Amorim R, Lenoir V, Simões RF, et al. RIPK3 dampens mitochondrial bioenergetics and lipid droplet dynamics in metabolic liver disease. Hepatology. 2023; 77: 1319–1334.
[80]
Dawson PA, Karpen SJ. Intestinal transport and metabolism of bile acids. Journal of Lipid Research. 2015; 56: 1085–1099.
[81]
Friedman SL, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Rinella M, Sanyal AJ. Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies. Nature Medicine. 2018; 24: 908–922.
[82]
Yamashita Y, Gohda K, Iguchi Y, Fujimori K, Oda K, Masuda A, et al. Discovery of FXR/PPARγ dual partial agonist. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 2023; 85: 117238.
[83]
Malaguarnera M, Greco F, Barone G, Gargante MP, Malaguarnera M, Toscano MA. Bifidobacterium longum with fructo-oligosaccharide (FOS) treatment in minimal hepatic encephalopathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2007; 52: 3259–3265.
[84]
Yuan Y, Sun ZM, Zhang Y, Liang FF, He XX. Influence of gut microecology on the pathogenesis and treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2016; 24: 375–379. (In Chinese)
[85]
Feng Q, Liu W, Baker SS, Li H, Chen C, Liu Q, et al. Multi-targeting therapeutic mechanisms of the Chinese herbal medicine QHD in the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 27820–27838.
[86]
Bhathena J, Martoni C, Kulamarva A, Tomaro-Duchesneau C, Malhotra M, Paul A, et al. Oral probiotic microcapsule formulation ameliorates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Bio F1B Golden Syrian hamsters. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e58394.
[87]
Song Q, Zhang X, Liu W, Wei H, Liang W, Zhou Y, et al. Bifidobacterium pseudolongum-generated acetate suppresses non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Hepatology. 2023; 79: 1352–1365.
[88]
Xue L, He J, Gao N, Lu X, Li M, Wu X, et al. Probiotics may delay the progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by restoring the gut microbiota structure and improving intestinal endotoxemia. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7: 45176.
[89]
Xiao MW, Lin SX, Shen ZH, Luo WW, Wang XY. Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: The Effects of Probiotics in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2019; 2019: 1484598.
[90]
Tang Y, Huang J, Zhang WY, Qin S, Yang YX, Ren H, et al. Effects of probiotics on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology. 2019; 12: 1756284819878046.
[91]
Cristofori F, Dargenio VN, Dargenio C, Miniello VL, Barone M, Francavilla R. Anti-Inflammatory and Immunomodulatory Effects of Probiotics in Gut Inflammation: A Door to the Body. Frontiers in Immunology. 2021; 12: 578386.
[92]
Derrien M, Belzer C, de Vos WM. Akkermansia muciniphila and its role in regulating host functions. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2017; 106: 171–181.
[93]
Mithieux G. Does Akkermansia muciniphila play a role in type 1 diabetes? Gut. 2018; 67: 1373–1374.
[94]
Gauffin Cano P, Santacruz A, Moya Á, Sanz Y. Bacteroides uniformis CECT 7771 ameliorates metabolic and immunological dysfunction in mice with high-fat-diet induced obesity. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e41079.
[95]
Lee HB, Do MH, Jhun H, Ha SK, Song HS, Roh SW, et al. Amelioration of Hepatic Steatosis in Mice through Bacteroides uniformis CBA7346-Mediated Regulation of High-Fat Diet-Induced Insulin Resistance and Lipogenesis. Nutrients. 2021; 13: 2989.
[96]
Chen B, Sun L, Zeng G, Shen Z, Wang K, Yin L, et al. Gut bacteria alleviate smoking-related NASH by degrading gut nicotine. Nature. 2022; 610: 562–568.
[97]
Udayappan S, Manneras-Holm L, Chaplin-Scott A, Belzer C, Herrema H, Dallinga-Thie GM, et al. Oral treatment with Eubacterium hallii improves insulin sensitivity in db/db mice. NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes. 2016; 2: 16009.
[98]
Quévrain E, Maubert MA, Michon C, Chain F, Marquant R, Tailhades J, et al. Identification of an anti-inflammatory protein from Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a commensal bacterium deficient in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2016; 65: 415–425.
[99]
Kobyliak N, Abenavoli L, Mykhalchyshyn G, Kononenko L, Boccuto L, Kyriienko D, et al. A Multi-strain Probiotic Reduces the Fatty Liver Index, Cytokines and Aminotransferase levels in NAFLD Patients: Evidence from a Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases. 2018; 27: 41–49.
[100]
Atarashi K, Tanoue T, Oshima K, Suda W, Nagano Y, Nishikawa H, et al. Treg induction by a rationally selected mixture of Clostridia strains from the human microbiota. Nature. 2013; 500: 232–236.
[101]
Yao M, Qv L, Lu Y, Wang B, Berglund B, Li L. An Update on the Efficacy and Functionality of Probiotics for the Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Engineering. 2021; 7: 679–686.
[102]
Gibson GR, Roberfroid MB. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. The Journal of Nutrition. 1995; 125: 1401–1412.
[103]
Gibson GR, Hutkins R, Sanders ME, Prescott SL, Reimer RA, Salminen SJ, et al. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2017; 14: 491–502.
[104]
Mirji G, Worth A, Bhat SA, El Sayed M, Kannan T, Goldman AR, et al. The microbiome-derived metabolite TMAO drives immune activation and boosts responses to immune checkpoint blockade in pancreatic cancer. Science Immunology. 2022; 7: eabn0704.
[105]
Yang S, Dai H, Lu Y, Li R, Gao C, Pan S. Trimethylamine N-Oxide Promotes Cell Proliferation and Angiogenesis in Colorectal Cancer. Journal of Immunology Research. 2022; 2022: 7043856.
[106]
Renner K, Singer K, Koehl GE, Geissler EK, Peter K, Siska PJ, et al. Metabolic Hallmarks of Tumor and Immune Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment. Frontiers in Immunology. 2017; 8: 248.
[107]
Cassim S, Pouyssegur J. Tumor Microenvironment: A Metabolic Player that Shapes the Immune Response. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 21: 157.
[108]
Liu C, Liu D, Wang F, Liu Y, Xie J, Xie J, et al. Construction of a novel choline metabolism-related signature to predict prognosis, immune landscape, and chemotherapy response in colon adenocarcinoma. Frontiers in Immunology. 2022; 13: 1038927.
[109]
Watson GA, Sanz-Garcia E, Zhang WJ, Liu ZA, Yang SC, Wang B, et al. Increase in serum choline levels predicts for improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced cancers receiving pembrolizumab. Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer. 2022; 10: e004378.
[110]
Pacheco-Torres J, Penet MF, Mironchik Y, Krishnamachary B, Bhujwalla ZM. The PD-L1 metabolic interactome intersects with choline metabolism and inflammation. Cancer & Metabolism. 2021; 9: 10.
[111]
Wang H, Rong X, Zhao G, Zhou Y, Xiao Y, Ma D, et al. The microbial metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide promotes antitumor immunity in triple-negative breast cancer. Cell Metabolism. 2022; 34: 581–594.e8.
[112]
Zhang Q, Lou Y, Bai XL, Liang TB. Immunometabolism: A novel perspective of liver cancer microenvironment and its influence on tumor progression. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2018; 24: 3500–3512.
[113]
Glunde K, Penet MF, Jiang L, Jacobs MA, Bhujwalla ZM. Choline metabolism-based molecular diagnosis of cancer: an update. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. 2015; 15: 735–747.
[114]
Glunde K, Bhujwalla ZM. Choline kinase alpha in cancer prognosis and treatment. The Lancet. Oncology. 2007; 8: 855–857.
[115]
Glunde K, Serkova NJ. Therapeutic targets and biomarkers identified in cancer choline phospholipid metabolism. Pharmacogenomics. 2006; 7: 1109–1123.
[116]
Iorio E, Ricci A, Bagnoli M, Pisanu ME, Castellano G, Di Vito M, et al. Activation of phosphatidylcholine cycle enzymes in human epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Research. 2010; 70: 2126–2135.
[117]
Hirai K, Watanabe S, Nishijima N, Shibata K, Hase A, Yamanaka T, et al. Molecular and Functional Analysis of Choline Transporters and Antitumor Effects of Choline Transporter-Like Protein 1 Inhibitors in Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21: 5190.
[118]
Inazu M, Yamada T, Kubota N, Yamanaka T. Functional expression of choline transporter-like protein 1 (CTL1) in small cell lung carcinoma cells: a target molecule for lung cancer therapy. Pharmacological Research. 2013; 76: 119–131.
[119]
Wu G, Aoyama C, Young SG, Vance DE. Early embryonic lethality caused by disruption of the gene for choline kinase alpha, the first enzyme in phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2008; 283: 1456–1462.
[120]
Li Z, Tan Y, Li X, Quan J, Bode AM, Cao Y, et al. DHRS2 inhibits cell growth and metastasis in ovarian cancer by downregulation of CHKα to disrupt choline metabolism. Cell Death & Disease. 2022; 13: 845.
[121]
Asim M, Massie CE, Orafidiya F, Pértega-Gomes N, Warren AY, Esmaeili M, et al. Choline Kinase Alpha as an Androgen Receptor Chaperone and Prostate Cancer Therapeutic Target. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2015; 108: djv371.
[122]
Ramírez de Molina A, Báñez-Coronel M, Gutiérrez R, Rodríguez-González A, Olmeda D, Megías D, et al. Choline kinase activation is a critical requirement for the proliferation of primary human mammary epithelial cells and breast tumor progression. Cancer Research. 2004; 64: 6732–6739.
[123]
Hanahan DJ, Chaikoff IL. On the nature of the phosphorus-containing lipides of cabbage leaves and their relation to a phospholipide-splitting enzyme contained in these leaves. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1948; 172: 191–198.
[124]
Kang DW, Choi KY, Min DS. Functional regulation of phospholipase D expression in cancer and inflammation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2014; 289: 22575–22582.
[125]
Glunde K, Shah T, Winnard PT, Jr, Raman V, Takagi T, Vesuna F, et al. Hypoxia regulates choline kinase expression through hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha signaling in a human prostate cancer model. Cancer Research. 2008; 68: 172–180.
[126]
Sonkar K, Ayyappan V, Tressler CM, Adelaja O, Cai R, Cheng M, et al. Focus on the glycerophosphocholine pathway in choline phospholipid metabolism of cancer. NMR in Biomedicine. 2019; 32: e4112.
[127]
Glunde K, Jacobs MA, Bhujwalla ZM. Choline metabolism in cancer: implications for diagnosis and therapy. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics. 2006; 6: 821–829.
[128]
Agarwal K, Hariprasad G, Rani K, Sharma U, Mathur SR, Seenu V, et al. Is there an association between enhanced choline and β-catenin pathway in breast cancer? A pilot study by MR Spectroscopy and ELISA. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7: 2221.
[129]
Glunde K, Ackerstaff E, Mori N, Jacobs MA, Bhujwalla ZM. Choline phospholipid metabolism in cancer: consequences for molecular pharmaceutical interventions. Molecular Pharmaceutics. 2006; 3: 496–506.
[130]
Bagnoli M, Granata A, Nicoletti R, Krishnamachary B, Bhujwalla ZM, Canese R, et al. Choline Metabolism Alteration: A Focus on Ovarian Cancer. Frontiers in Oncology. 2016; 6: 153.
[131]
Mapelli P, Picchio M. Initial prostate cancer diagnosis and disease staging–the role of choline-PET-CT. Nature Reviews. Urology. 2015; 12: 510–518.
[132]
Apostolova I, Wedel F, Brenner W. Imaging of Tumor Metabolism Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Recent Results in Cancer Research. Fortschritte Der Krebsforschung. Progres Dans Les Recherches Sur Le Cancer. 2016; 207: 177–205.
[133]
Mansi L, Cuccurullo V, Evangelista L. Is radiocholine PET/CT already clinically useful in patients with prostate cancer? Journal of Nuclear Medicine: Official Publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2014; 55: 1401–1403.
[134]
Richman EL, Kenfield SA, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci EL, Zeisel SH, Willett WC, et al. Choline intake and risk of lethal prostate cancer: incidence and survival. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2012; 96: 855–863.
[135]
Kelloff GJ, Hoffman JM, Johnson B, Scher HI, Siegel BA, Cheng EY, et al. Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development. Clinical Cancer Research. 2005; 11: 2785–2808.
[136]
Dettmer K, Aronov PA, Hammock BD. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. Mass Spectrometry Reviews. 2007; 26: 51–78.
[137]
Beloueche-Babari M, Chung YL, Al-Saffar NMS, Falck-Miniotis M, Leach MO. Metabolic assessment of the action of targeted cancer therapeutics using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. British Journal of Cancer. 2010; 102: 1–7.
[138]
Podo F. Tumour phospholipid metabolism. NMR in Biomedicine. 1999; 12: 413–439.
[139]
Podo F, Canevari S, Canese R, Pisanu ME, Ricci A, Iorio E. MR evaluation of response to targeted treatment in cancer cells. NMR in Biomedicine. 2011; 24: 648–672.
[140]
Sun P, Wu Z, Lin L, Hu G, Zhang X, Wang J. MR-Nucleomics: The study of pathological cellular processes with multinuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and imaging in vivo. NMR in Biomedicine. 2023; 36: e4845.
[141]
Meyerspeer M, Boesch C, Cameron D, Dezortová M, Forbes SC, Heerschap A, et al. 31 P magnetic resonance spectroscopy in skeletal muscle: Experts’ consensus recommendations. NMR in Biomedicine. 2020; 34: e4246.
[142]
Katz-Brull R, Margalit R, Degani H. Differential routing of choline in implanted breast cancer and normal organs. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2001; 46: 31–38.
[143]
Iorio E, Mezzanzanica D, Alberti P, Spadaro F, Ramoni C, D’Ascenzo S, et al. Alterations of choline phospholipid metabolism in ovarian tumor progression. Cancer Research. 2005; 65: 9369–9376.
[144]
Lin G, Chung YL. Current opportunities and challenges of magnetic resonance spectroscopy, positron emission tomography, and mass spectrometry imaging for mapping cancer metabolism in vivo. BioMed Research International. 2014; 2014: 625095.
[145]
Serkova NJ, Brown MS. Quantitative analysis in magnetic resonance spectroscopy: from metabolic profiling to in vivo biomarkers. Bioanalysis. 2012; 4: 321–341.
[146]
Glunde K, Jie C, Bhujwalla ZM. Molecular causes of the aberrant choline phospholipid metabolism in breast cancer. Cancer Research. 2004; 64: 4270–4276.
[147]
De Feyter HM, de Graaf RA. Deuterium metabolic imaging - Back to the future. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 2021; 326: 106932.
[148]
Chen Ming Low J, Wright AJ, Hesse F, Cao J, Brindle KM. Metabolic imaging with deuterium labeled substrates. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. 2023; 134–135: 39–51.
[149]
Ge X, Song KH, Engelbach JA, Yuan L, Gao F, Dahiya S, et al. Distinguishing Tumor Admixed in a Radiation Necrosis (RN) Background: 1H and 2H MR With a Novel Mouse Brain-Tumor/RN Model. Frontiers in Oncology. 2022; 12: 885480.
[150]
Yuan JH, Yang F, Wang F, Ma JZ, Guo YJ, Tao QF, et al. A long noncoding RNA activated by TGF-β promotes the invasion-metastasis cascade in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2014; 25: 666–681.
[151]
Saito RDF, Andrade LNDS, Bustos SO, Chammas R. Phosphatidylcholine-Derived Lipid Mediators: The Crosstalk Between Cancer Cells and Immune Cells. Frontiers in Immunology. 2022; 13: 768606.
[152]
Zeisel SH. Dietary choline deficiency causes DNA strand breaks and alters epigenetic marks on DNA and histones. Mutation Research. 2012; 733: 34–38.
[153]
Jaeschke H, Gores GJ, Cederbaum AI, Hinson JA, Pessayre D, Lemasters JJ. Mechanisms of hepatotoxicity. Toxicological Sciences. 2002; 65: 166–176.
[154]
Snider SA, Margison KD, Ghorbani P, LeBlond ND, O’Dwyer C, Nunes JRC, et al. Choline transport links macrophage phospholipid metabolism and inflammation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2018; 293: 11600–11611.
[155]
Wang Q, Zhou H, Bu Q, Wei S, Li L, Zhou J, et al. Role of XBP1 in regulating the progression of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Journal of Hepatology. 2022; 77: 312–325.
[156]
Zeisel S. Choline, Other Methyl-Donors and Epigenetics. Nutrients. 2017; 9: 445.
[157]
Lin XM, Hu L, Gu J, Wang RY, Li L, Tang J, et al. Choline Kinase α Mediates Interactions Between the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells to Promote Drug Resistance and Xenograft Tumor Progression. Gastroenterology. 2017; 152: 1187–1202.
[158]
Hernández-Alcoceba R, Saniger L, Campos J, Núñez MC, Khaless F, Gallo MA, et al. Choline kinase inhibitors as a novel approach for antiproliferative drug design. Oncogene. 1997; 15: 2289–2301.
[159]
García-Molina P, Sola-Leyva A, Luque-Navarro PM, Laso A, Ríos-Marco P, Ríos A, et al. Anticancer Activity of the Choline Kinase Inhibitor PL48 Is Due to Selective Disruption of Choline Metabolism and Transport Systems in Cancer Cell Lines. Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14: 426.
[160]
Shah T, Stasinopoulos I, Wildes F, Kakkad S, Artemov D, Bhujwalla ZM. Noninvasive imaging identifies new roles for cyclooxygenase-2 in choline and lipid metabolism of human breast cancer cells. NMR in Biomedicine. 2012; 25: 746–754.
[161]
Tomic D, Kemp WW, Roberts SK. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: current concepts, epidemiology and management strategies. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2018; 30: 1103–1115.
[162]
Tsai E, Lee TP. Diagnosis and Evaluation of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, Including Noninvasive Biomarkers and Transient Elastography. Clinics in Liver Disease. 2018; 22: 73–92.
[163]
Younossi ZM, Henry L, Bush H, Mishra A. Clinical and Economic Burden of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Clinics in Liver Disease. 2018; 22: 1–10.
[164]
Nagashimada M, Ota T. Role of vitamin E in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. IUBMB Life. 2019; 71: 516–522.
[165]
Perumpail BJ, Li AA, John N, Sallam S, Shah ND, Kwong W, et al. The Role of Vitamin E in the Treatment of NAFLD. Diseases. 2018; 6: 86.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share
Back to top