IMR Press / FBS / Volume 17 / Issue 4 / DOI: 10.31083/FBS38706
Open Access Original Research
Genomic Insights Into Developmental Language Disorders: Biomarkers and Their Interactions
Show Less
Affiliation
1 Biotechnology Center (BIOTEC), Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
2 Information Technology Research and Development Centre, University of Kufa, 54003 Kufa, Iraq
*Correspondence: ali.al-fatlawi@tu-dresden.de-id.com (Ali Al-Fatlawi)
Front. Biosci. (Schol Ed) 2025, 17(4), 38706; https://doi.org/10.31083/FBS38706 (registering DOI)
Submitted: 28 February 2025 | Revised: 15 May 2025 | Accepted: 30 June 2025 | Published: 18 November 2025
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract
Background:

Developmental language disorders (DLDs) are common neurodevelopmental conditions, affecting approximately 7–10% of children, with significant impacts on communication, academic achievement, and social integration. While genetic factors are known contributors, the underlying genomic architecture and biological pathways remain incompletely understood. This analysis explores key genomic biomarkers of DLD and investigates their functional interactions.

Methods:

We conducted an integrative genomic analysis combining multiple data-driven approaches. Using the Open Targets platform, we compiled a set of genes associated with DLD-related phenotypes (based on evidence scores ≥0.3) and constructed a gene-phenotype network to visualize these associations. Protein-protein interaction mapping of the identified genes was performed using the STRING database to uncover interaction clusters and shared pathways. We then analyzed sequence and structural relationships among the encoded proteins, including pairwise sequence homology (BLAST alignments), 3D structural modeling, and multimeric interaction prediction using AlphaFold 3.

Results:

Our analysis identified 89 genes linked to 14 DLD-related phenotypic terms, with strong clustering around delayed speech. Several genes (e.g., GRN, MAPT, FOXP2, FOXP1, AP4E1) showed particularly high-confidence associations. Structural analysis of encoded proteins revealed unexpected similarity between functionally related but sequence-divergent pairs (e.g., WDR45 and GNB1). AlphaFold 3 modeling predicted a potential interaction between DCDC2 and KIAA0319, suggesting a plausible structural mechanism for their co-involvement in dyslexia.

Conclusions:

DLDs emerge from diverse genetic contributors but converge on shared neurodevelopmental pathways. Structural modeling enhances genomic insights by uncovering hidden relationships and candidate interactions, paving the way for more precise genetic screening and functional studies in language disorders.

Keywords
developmental language disorders
language disorders
genomics
language impairments
Figures
Fig. 1.
Share
Back to top