IMR Press / JIN / Volume 23 / Issue 10 / DOI: 10.31083/j.jin2310190
Open Access Short Communication
Reduced GABA Levels in the ACC of Actively Drinking High Risk Individuals Compared to Recently Detoxified Alcohol-Dependent Patients
Show Less
Affiliation
1 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany
2 Epilepsy-Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Institute for Diagnostics of Epilepsy, 10365 Berlin, Germany
3 Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), 10587 Berlin, Germany
4 German Center for Mental Health (DZPG) Partner Site Berlin-Potsdam, 10117 Berlin, Germany
5 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), 20251 Hamburg, Germany
*Correspondence: gianna.spitta@charite.de (Gianna Spitta)
J. Integr. Neurosci. 2024, 23(10), 190; https://doi.org/10.31083/j.jin2310190
Submitted: 10 July 2024 | Revised: 8 August 2024 | Accepted: 14 August 2024 | Published: 14 October 2024
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Abstract
Background:

Acute gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAergic) effects of alcohol consumption are well-known, whereas prior research has yielded inconsistent findings regarding on adaptations of the GABAergic neurotransmitter system to chronic alcohol use. Previous studies indicate either elevated or reduced GABA levels in cortical regions such as the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in persons with alcohol use disorder (AUD). We tested the hypothesis that active alcohol consumption compared to abstinence contributes to GABA levels as observed in prior research on chronic alcohol use.

Methods:

We investigated GABA levels in the ACC of 31 healthy controls (low risk, LR), 38 high risk individuals providing an active drinking pattern (high risk, HR) and 27 recently detoxified alcohol-dependent (AD) subjects via proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS).

Results:

GABA levels in the ACC were significantly lower in HR compared with AD, but did neither differ between LR and AD nor between LR and HR. Also, we observed a quadratic effect indicating a distribution of GABA levels in the ACC as follows: LR > HR < AD. GABA levels were not associated with abstinence duration in AD.

Conclusions:

This study suggests that the GABAergic neurotransmitter system is blunted in AUD. More precisely GABA levels in the ACC seem to be higher in recently detoxified AD patients than in individuals at high risk which might suggest that GABA levels may increase after abstinence. No correlation was found between GABA levels and abstinence duration. Longitudinal studies are required to investigate alterations in the GABAergic system throughout the development and maintenance of AUD.

Clinical Trial Registration:

No: NCT02094196. Registered 20 March 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02094196.

Keywords
magnetic resonance spectroscopy
GABA
γ-aminobutyric acid
alcohol dependence
individuals at high risk
1. Introduction

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a mental condition associated with premature death and disability worldwide [1]. It can manifest as a chronic relapsing disorder with severe mental and physical consequences for the individual as well as their friends and families [1]. The pathogenesis of AUD is not yet completely understood, and different neurotransmitter systems have been implicated during the development and maintenance of the disease. Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system [2] and GABA receptors are activated by acute alcohol consumption leading to pleasurable behavioral effects such as anxiolysis and sedation. The GABAergic neurotransmitter system appears to be dysfunctional in AUD, although the precise mechanisms remain unclear [3, 4, 5]. Several studies have reported decreased GABA concentration within the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) of individuals with AUD relative to healthy controls (HC) [6, 7]. In contrast, other studies did not find differences of GABA levels between HC and persons with AUD in the ACC [8, 9]. Taken together, the authors reviewing these studies conclude that GABA seems to be increased or decreased before initiating abstinence, then decreased during early abstinence and increase or normalize again during prolonged abstinence [3]. GABAergic neurotransmission significantly influences the dopaminergic system [10], underscoring the role of GABA in modulating reward pathways, a key factor in the etiology of AUD. Our research group recently identified a negative correlation between GABA concentration in the ACC and dopamine D2/3 receptor availability within the associative striatum in healthy control subjects. This relationship was not observed in individuals at high risk for or recently detoxified from alcohol-dependent (AD) [11]. This potential regulatory cortical mechanism of the mesolimbic reward system appears to be disrupted in AUD, suggesting a complex interaction of multiple neurotransmitter systems in the development and maintenance of the condition.

This study aimed to investigate GABA levels in the ACC of healthy controls (low risk, LR), actively drinking individuals at high risk (HR) for alcohol dependence, and recently abstinent alcohol-dependent (AD) patients. Based on previous research, we hypothesized that GABA levels would be decreased in HR individuals compared to LR. Additionally, we hypothesized an increase in GABA levels in AD patients relative to HR individuals. Furthermore, we explored the correlation between abstinence duration and GABA levels in the ACC of AD patients.

2. Methods
2.1 Subjects

The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee (Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; EA1/245/11), and all patients or their families/legal guardians gave written consent before participating in the study. A subsample of this proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) data has already been published together with 18F-fallypride positron emission tomography (PET) data [11]. This study was a component of a large, multi-site study examining the neurobiological and cognitive alterations associated with the onset and persistence of AUD (LeAD study; Project 5, The Role of Dopaminergic and Glutamatergic Neurotransmission for Dysfunctional Learning in Alcohol Use Disorders, https://gepris.dfg.de/gepris/projekt/209293518, clinical trial number: NCT02094196).

The study sample consisted of 96 participants divided into three groups: 31 LR individuals, 38 HR individuals, and 27 recently detoxified AD patients. The three groups were comparable in terms of age, handedness, and smoking status (see Table 1 (Ref. [12, 13, 14]) for detailed demographic information). Although we tried to match groups carefully, there was a trend towards a significant difference in the smoking status between groups which is why we included smoking as a covariate in our analyses. LR control participants were recruited from the general population, while AD patients were enrolled from various inpatient psychiatric clinics in Berlin. HR individuals were also recruited from the community and classified as such based on an Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score exceeding eight [15]. To ensure diagnostic accuracy, all participants underwent a Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) to exclude alcohol dependence according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria in HR and LR groups and to rule out any history of other substance use disorders [16, 17].

Table 1. Descriptive statistics.
Group (N = 96) ANOVA
Demographic Variables LR (n = 31) HR (n = 38) AD (n = 27) F/p value
Gender 6 female, 25 male 4 female, 34 male 5 female, 22 male 0.018/0.893
Handedness 31 right-handed 31 right-handed 26 right, 1 left-handed 1.32/0.271
Smokers, % 71% 95% 89% 3.92/0.051
Mean (SD)
Age, years 46.3 (9.8) 43.1 (9.0) 45.6 (10.3) 2.47/0.332
Education, years 14.5 (2.8) 16.3 (4.1) 15.2 (3.6) 0.831/0.672
Clinical characteristics
Duration of abstinence, days - - 36.2 (20.1) -
Symptom severitya 3.0 (3.9) 7.8 (6.8) 16.4 (6.2) 4.68/<0.001*
Cravinga 2.8 (3.2) 8.2 (5.3) 13.7 (8.3) 4.08/<0.001*
Anxietya 2.5 (2.3) 7.5 (3.3) 5.3 (3.6) 1.74/0.093
Depressive symptomsa 2.2 (2.6) 5 (3.2) 3.3 (3.2) 0.90/0.537
Age at first drink 14.9 (1.9) - 14.3 (3.7) -
Age of first AD diagnosis - - 32.1 (11.8) -
Years since AD diagnosis - - 12.7 (9.5) -

aSymptom severity of alcohol-related symptoms measured via ADS Score [12], Craving symptoms measured via OCDS [13], Anxiety symptoms measured via HADS-A [14], Depressive symptoms measured via HADS-D [14]. *Significant difference. AD, alcohol-dependent; ANOVA, analysis of variance; LR, low risk; HR, high risk; SD, standard deviation; ADS, Alcohol Dependence Scale; OCDS, Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale; HADS-A, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety symptoms; HADS-D, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depressive symptoms.

All AD patients completed an inpatient detoxification program prior to study enrollment. Participants were diagnosed with AD according to both the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th revision (ICD-10) and DSM-IV criteria by a qualified clinician and had a minimum of three years of AD history. To minimize pharmacological influences, AD subjects were medication-free for at least four half-lives of any previously prescribed psychotropic drug and exhibited mild withdrawal symptoms (Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol (CIWA) - Score <3) at the time of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning. All subjects were scanned at one time point and at rest. Exclusion criteria encompassed past or present substance dependence beyond alcohol or nicotine (verified through urine screening), major psychiatric disorders, neurological conditions, and any contraindications for MRI.

2.2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy

MRI data were acquired using a 3 Tesla Verio scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) equipped with a 32-channel receive-only head coil. Following a localization scan, high-resolution anatomical images were obtained using a three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence. Image acquisition parameters included a repetition time (TR) of 2.3 ms, an echo time (TE) of 3.03 ms, a flip angle of 9°, a 256 × 256 × 192 matrix, and a voxel size of 1 × 1 × 1 mm3. Subsequently, a 25 × 35 × 20 mm3 voxel of interest (VOI) was positioned over the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) for subsequent magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Prior to MRS data acquisition, first and second-order shims were optimized using the “fast automatic shimming technique by mapping along projections” (FAST(EST)MAP) method [18]. Subsequently, water signal linewidth was assessed, ensuring a value not exceeding 7 Hz in all cases. Finally, spectra were collected using the spin-echo full intensity-acquired localized (SPECIAL) technique [19]. The employed sequence combines Image-Selected In Vivo Spectroscopy (ISIS) with a slice-selective spin-echo technique [20]. Alternate scans utilize a slice-selective adiabatic inversion pulse. This was performed to achieve localization perpendicular to the spin-echo plane. Further, a subsequent spin-echo sequence, employing asymmetric 90° and 180° slice-selective refocusing pulses, localizes the signal within two dimensions. Signal subtraction between odd and even scans are performed. This method enables the acquisition of very short echo times, owing to the use of a single refocusing pulse, facilitating the detection of numerous metabolites and precise glutamate quantification [21, 22]. Water suppression was achieved using the variable power radio frequency pulses with optimized relaxation delays (VAPOR) technique [23]. Additionally, six outer volume suppression slices were positioned around the spectroscopic voxel to minimize signal contamination from surrounding tissues. A total of 256 scans were acquired for each metabolite spectrum, employing a TR of 3 seconds and a TE of 8.5 milliseconds. Immediately following this, a water-unsuppressed spectrum was recorded with eight averages. Water linewidth was calculated by fitting the water spectrum after shimming to 6.2 ± 0.4 Hertz. Metabolite levels were determined using linear combination (LC) model [24] with a simulated basis set of 20 metabolites, utilizing the unsuppressed water scan for eddy current correction. Mean Cramer-Rao lower bounds (CRLBs) for GABA and glutamate quantification were determined to be 16.0% and 4.4%, respectively. Metabolite signal intensities were corrected for relaxation effects using T1 and T2 relaxation times established at 3T [25, 26]. To account for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) contamination within the voxel, Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient Echo (MPRAGE) images were segmented using statistical parametric mapping (SPM8) [27]. Voxel pixels were classified as CSF, gray matter, or white matter based on probability values generated by SPM8. See Fig. 1 for the voxel position and voxel size.

Fig. 1.

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) voxel position of the voxel of interest in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) with a voxel size of 25 × 35 × 20 mm3.

2.3 Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS Statistics Version 29.0.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). From the total sample size of 96 subjects GABA levels in the ACC were available for 92 subjects. Further, outliers were visually identified and consecutively excluded. We excluded two outliers in the LR, one in the HR and one in the AD group with a resulting sample size of 88 (LR = 28, HR = 35, AD = 25). After the exclusion of outliers’ normal distribution was achieved and statistically confirmed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test.

We included smoking status as a covariate into the analyses as it has been shown that smoking seems to influence cortical GABA levels in HC as well as AD [28] and our groups differed marginally significant in their smoking status (see descriptive statistics, Table 1). We performed the group comparison of GABA levels in the ACC with an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and consecutive post hoc tests. To analyze the relationship between the alcohol use pattern and GABA levels, planned contrast weights were investigated for a (negative) quadratic (LR > HR < AD) relationship between GABA and group. The negative quadratic effect would support our hypothesis of a decrease of GABA levels in HR subjects and an alteration of GABA levels in abstinent AD subjects. Correlation with clinical scales such as abstinence duration, Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS), Alcohol Dependence Scale (ADS), or Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were conducted using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

3. Results
3.1 Group Comparison

There was a significant effect of group (LR/HR/AD) on GABA levels in the ACC F(2, 84) = 4.08, p = 0.020. Further, we observed a significant quadratic trend F(2, 85) = 4.99, p = 0.030 throughout the sample, indicating a distribution of GABA levels as follows: LR > HR < AD. Post hoc tests (Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (Tukey HSD)) revealed significantly higher GABA levels in AD compared to HR subjects (p = 0.006), but neither between AD and LR subjects (p = 0.066), nor between LR and HR subjects (p = 0.372). Boxplots of GABA levels in the ACC in each group are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Boxplots of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) concentration (in mmol/L) within the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) were generated for three groups: low-risk healthy controls (LR), individuals at high risk of alcohol use disorder (HR), and recently detoxified alcohol-dependent patients (AD). *a significant group difference was observed (F(2,85) = 4.14, p = 0.019), as well as a significant quadratic trend (F(2,85) = 4.99, p = 0.028), indicating a GABA concentration distribution of LR > HR < AD.

3.2 Clinical Correlations

Abstinence duration in AD (mean: 36.2 days, minimum: 8 days, maximum: 95 days, standard deviation: 20.1) was not correlated with GABA levels in the ACC Pearson correlation: r = –0.165, p = 0.431. Furthermore, GABA levels in the ACC were not correlated with craving symptoms (OCDS), symptom severity of alcoholism (ADS), depressive or anxiety symptoms (HADS) across the entire sample or within either the HR or AD groups.

4. Discussion

GABA concentrations within the ACC were significantly elevated in recently detoxified AD patients compared to high-risk individuals, consistent with our initial hypothesis. However, no significant difference in GABA levels was observed between AD patients and LR individuals. Furthermore, a significant negative quadratic trend in GABA levels across the entire sample was identified, suggesting a distribution pattern of GABA concentrations as follows: LR > HR < AD. Nevertheless, the difference in GABA levels between LR and HR groups did not reach statistical significance.

Our findings are in line with the literature indicating that in actively drinking individuals and in early abstinence the GABA levels seem to be decreased compared to healthy controls [6, 29]. Although GABA levels were not significantly reduced in HR compared to LR subjects, the significant quadratic effect (LR > HR < AD) suggests that this may be due to the limited sample size and lack of longitudinal data. Indicating a potential recovery of GABA following detoxification, GABA levels were increased in AD > HR with a mean abstinence duration of 36.2 days, in accordance with the literature suggesting recovery during prolonged abstinence to the level of healthy controls [8, 28]. In our study, AD subjects and LR subjects did not differ significantly in their GABA levels, which supports this assumption. The quadratic effect and distribution of GABA levels in the three subgroups (LR > HR < AD) supports the hypothesis of a dynamic modulation of the GABAergic neurotransmitter system during the different stages of AUD.

As the GABAergic system seems to modulate the dopaminergic neurotransmitter system, it may interplay with the reward system that plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of additive disorders [10]. More specifically, potential cortical regulatory mechanisms exerted by GABA on mesolimbic dopamine function may be disrupted in AUD. This hypothesis is supported by our recent findings of a negative correlation between GABA levels in the ACC and dopamine D2/3 receptor availability within the dorsal striatum in healthy controls, a relationship absent in both high-risk individuals and recently detoxified AD patients [11].

Clinical implications of the modulated GABAergic neurotransmitter system may be deduced from the effective use of baclofen to improve abstinence in AUD [30, 31, 32]. Baclofen is a derivate of GABA which seems to activate GABA receptors and baclofen seems to reduce the total alcohol consumption although long-term effects are questionable [31]. In this study, we were not able to find an association of clinical variables with GABA levels in AD, and abstinence duration was not correlated with GABA levels in the ACC of AD subjects. This may be due to the three subgroups and the resulting relatively small sample size of this subgroup (n = 25).

In general, limitations of this study are the relatively small sample size of the subgroups due to the study design with three subgroups representing different stages of AUD. We accepted this limitation due to the dimensional approach of this study. Also, although effects of smoking on GABA levels were observed, groups trended towards a significant difference in smoking status which was subsequently included as a covariate. Another limitation is the informative value of 1H-MRS in general, as the total level of a neurotransmitter is calculated in the voxel of interest, but it is not clear whether the neurotransmitter is located pre- or postsynaptic and therefore the functional relevance is to somewhat degree restricted.

5. Conclusions

GABA concentrations within the ACC were significantly elevated in abstinent AD subjects compared to those with an active drinking pattern. This observation suggests a potential recovery of GABA levels towards the levels observed in LR controls (low risk use, healthy controls) following a prolonged abstinence period (mean: 36.2 days, approximately five weeks). This interpretation is supported by our finding of a quadratic trend (LR > HR < AD), which indicates a reduction of GABA levels in actively drinking individuals and a normalization following detoxification. Longitudinal studies are warranted to further elucidate dynamic alterations of GABAergic neurotransmission during the development and maintenance of AUD.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

JG, AH, and FS were responsible for the study concept and design. GS, TG, AR and LMM analyzed the data and wrote the draft. GS, FS and SA further designed the experimental procedures and collected the data. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee (Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin; EA1/245/11) and all patients or their families/legal guardians gave written consent before participating in the study.

Acknowledgment

We thank Ralf Mekle for providing the SPECIAL sequence.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grant/Award Numbers: GA 707/6-1, HE 2597/14-1, HE 2597/14-2, HE 2597/15-1, HE 2597/15-2, RA 1047/2-1, RA 1047/2-2, SFB TRR 265.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
[1]
World Health Organization (WHO). Global status report on alcohol and health. 2018. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565639 (Accessed: 2 May 2024).
[2]
Malenka R, Nestler E, Hyman S. Chapter 6-Widely Projecting Systems: Monoamines, Acetylcholine, and Orexin. Molecular Neuropharmacology: A Foundation for Clinical Neuroscience (pp. 147–148, 154–157). 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY. 2009.
[3]
Shyu C, Chavez S, Boileau I, Le Foll B. Quantifying GABA in Addiction: A Review of Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Studies. Brain Sciences. 2022; 12: 918.
[4]
Behar KL, Rothman DL, Petersen KF, Hooten M, Delaney R, Petroff OA, et al. Preliminary evidence of low cortical GABA levels in localized 1H-MR spectra of alcohol-dependent and hepatic encephalopathy patients. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 1999; 156: 952–954.
[5]
Kirkland AE, Browning BD, Green R, Leggio L, Meyerhoff DJ, Squeglia LM. Brain metabolite alterations related to alcohol use: a meta-analysis of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies. Molecular Psychiatry. 2022; 27: 3223–3236.
[6]
Prisciandaro JJ, Schacht JP, Prescot AP, Brenner HM, Renshaw PF, Brown TR, et al. Intraindividual changes in brain GABA, glutamate, and glutamine during monitored abstinence from alcohol in treatment-naive individuals with alcohol use disorder. Addiction Biology. 2020; 25: e12810.
[7]
Prisciandaro JJ, Schacht JP, Prescot AP, Renshaw PF, Brown TR, Anton RF. Brain Glutamate, GABA, and Glutamine Levels and Associations with Recent Drinking in Treatment-Naïve Individuals with Alcohol Use Disorder Versus Light Drinkers. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 2019; 43: 221–226.
[8]
Wang G, Weber-Fahr W, Frischknecht U, Hermann D, Kiefer F, Ende G, et al. Cortical Glutamate and GABA Changes During Early Abstinence in Alcohol Dependence and Their Associations with Benzodiazepine Medication. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2021; 12: 656468.
[9]
Mon A, Durazzo TC, Meyerhoff DJ. Glutamate, GABA, and other cortical metabolite concentrations during early abstinence from alcohol and their associations with neurocognitive changes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2012; 125: 27–36.
[10]
Volkow ND, Michaelides M, Baler R. The Neuroscience of Drug Reward and Addiction. Physiological Reviews. 2019; 99: 2115–2140.
[11]
Spitta G, Gleich T, Rosenthal A, Schubert F, Aydin S, Heinz A, et al. Correlation of striatal dopamine D2/3 receptor availability with GABA level in the anterior cingulate cortex in healthy controls but not in alcohol-dependent subjects and individuals at high risk: A multimodal magnetic resonance spectroscopy and positron emission tomography study. Addiction Biology. 2024; 29: e13424.
[12]
Skinner HA, Allen BA. Alcohol dependence syndrome: measurement and validation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1982; 91: 199–209.
[13]
Anton RF, Moak DH, Latham P. The Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale: a self-rated instrument for the quantification of thoughts about alcohol and drinking behavior. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. 1995; 19: 92–99.
[14]
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1983; 67: 361–370.
[15]
Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Archives of Internal Medicine. 1998; 158: 1789–1795.
[16]
Wittchen HU, Lachner G, Wunderlich U, Pfister H. Test-retest reliability of the computerized DSM-IV version of the Munich-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI). Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 1998; 33: 568–578.
[17]
Sullivan JT, Sykora K, Schneiderman J, Naranjo CA, Sellers EM. Assessment of alcohol withdrawal: the revised clinical institute withdrawal assessment for alcohol scale (CIWA-Ar). British Journal of Addiction. 1989; 84: 1353–1357.
[18]
Gruetter R, Tkác I. Field mapping without reference scan using asymmetric echo-planar techniques. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2000; 43: 319–323.
[19]
Mlynárik V, Gambarota G, Frenkel H, Gruetter R. Localized short-echo-time proton MR spectroscopy with full signal-intensity acquisition. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2006; 56: 965–970.
[20]
Ordidge RJ, Connelly A, Lohman JAB. Image-selected in Vivo spectroscopy (ISIS). A new technique for spatially selective NMR spectroscopy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969). 1986; 66: 283–294.
[21]
Mekle R, Mlynárik V, Gambarota G, Hergt M, Krueger G, Gruetter R. MR spectroscopy of the human brain with enhanced signal intensity at ultrashort echo times on a clinical platform at 3T and 7T. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2009; 61: 1279–1285.
[22]
Schubert F, Kühn S, Gallinat J, Mekle R, Ittermann B. Towards a neurochemical profile of the amygdala using short-TE 1 H magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 T. NMR in Biomedicine. 2017; 30.
[23]
Tkác I, Starcuk Z, Choi IY, Gruetter R. In vivo 1H NMR spectroscopy of rat brain at 1 ms echo time. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1999; 41: 649–656.
[24]
Provencher SW. Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1993; 30: 672–679.
[25]
Edden RAE, Intrapiromkul J, Zhu H, Cheng Y, Barker PB. Measuring T2 in vivo with J-difference editing: application to GABA at 3 Tesla. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: JMRI. 2012; 35: 229–234.
[26]
Schubert F, Gallinat J, Seifert F, Rinneberg H. Glutamate concentrations in human brain using single voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3 Tesla. NeuroImage. 2004; 21: 1762–1771.
[27]
Litvak V, Mattout J, Kiebel S, Phillips C, Henson R, Kilner J, et al. EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2011; 2011: 852961.
[28]
Mason GF, Petrakis IL, de Graaf RA, Gueorguieva R, Guidone E, Coric V, et al. Cortical gamma-aminobutyric acid levels and the recovery from ethanol dependence: preliminary evidence of modification by cigarette smoking. Biological Psychiatry. 2006; 59: 85–93.
[29]
Gomez R, Behar KL, Watzl J, Weinzimer SA, Gulanski B, Sanacora G, et al. Intravenous ethanol infusion decreases human cortical γ-aminobutyric acid and N-acetylaspartate as measured with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 4 tesla. Biological Psychiatry. 2012; 71: 239–246.
[30]
Bahji A, Bach P, Danilewitz M, Crockford D, Devoe DJ, El-Guebaly N, et al. Pharmacotherapies for Adults With Alcohol Use Disorders: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Journal of Addiction Medicine. 2022; 16: 630–638.
[31]
Kotake K, Hosokawa T, Tanaka M, So R, Banno M, Kataoka Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of alcohol reduction pharmacotherapy according to treatment duration in patients with alcohol dependence or alcohol use disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Addiction (Abingdon, England). 2024; 119: 815–832.
[32]
Müller CA, Geisel O, Pelz P, Higl V, Krüger J, Stickel A, et al. High-dose baclofen for the treatment of alcohol dependence (BACLAD study): a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. European Neuropsychopharmacology: the Journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015; 25: 1167–1177.

Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share
Back to top