- Academic Editor
When considering laparoscopic surgery for ovarian cysts (OCs), physicians must preoperatively differentiate benign ovarian tumours (Be-OTs) from other tumours, primarily based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Ovarian endometriotic cysts (OECs) and ovarian mature cystic teratomas (OMCTs) can typically be identified with high accuracy using MRI. However, OCs other than OECs and OMCTs may show borderline/malignant OT (Bo/Ma-OT) features on postoperative pathology, even when no suspicious solid components are detected preoperatively. Therefore, the aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse the data of 239 patients over a 15-year period at our institution to explore the potential for preoperative prediction of Bo/Ma-OT.
From July 1, 2010 and December 31, 2024, 239 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for preoperatively diagnosed serous/mucinous OCs (Se/Mu-OCs) were retrospectively analysed. Among them, 26 cases, including 23 borderline and 3 malignant tumours identified on postoperative pathological examination, were the primary focus of this study. To evaluate the influence of 16 factors, including MRI findings, tumour markers, and basic patient characteristics, both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.
According to the results of the chi-square test and multivariate analysis, none of the factors was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of Bo/Ma-OT.
Preoperative prediction of Bo/Ma-OT in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for Se/Mu-OCs remains challenging. Further accumulation of cases and continued analysis will be necessary.
As minimally invasive approaches have gained importance in gynecological surgery, laparoscopic surgery is generally performed for ovarian cysts (OCs) following careful preoperative assessment to determine that the lesion is benign [1]. Furthermore, when feasible, laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy is performed as an ovarian-sparing surgery in premenopausal patients requiring fertility preservation or hormonal support [2]. However, when a borderline/malignant ovarian tumour (Bo/Ma-OT) is identified, the primary treatment is converted to total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and the treatment strategy becomes more complex depending on the tumour stage, as the objective transitions to preventing tumour progression and recurrence [3, 4, 5]. Therefore, preoperative differentiation between Bo/Ma-OTs and benign OTs (Be-OTs), primarily based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, must be as accurate as possible [6, 7, 8]. However, although MRI is considered highly accurate in identifying ovarian endometriotic cysts (OECs) and ovarian mature cystic teratomas (OMCTs) as benign lesions, Bo/Ma-OT, especially in serous/mucinous OCs (Se/Mu-OCs), are sometimes identified postoperatively [9, 10]. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from our institution, excluding OECs and OMCTs, to investigate whether Bo/Ma-OT could be predicted preoperatively among other types of OCs, particularly Se/Mu-OCs, by assessing the accuracy of these predictions against postoperative pathological findings.
This retrospective study was reviewed and approved by the Human Ethics Committee of Kinan Hospital (Approval No. 283: Clinical outcomes of endoscopic surgery: retrospective analyses, 2024/4/23).
The deidentified medical records of 298 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for OCs between July 1, 2010 and December 31, 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery based on an almost definitive preoperative diagnosis of OECs or OMCTs—these diagnoses being the primary indications for surgical intervention—were excluded. Additionally, patients whose MRI findings suggested only the possibility of these conditions, specifically, 14 patients with OECs, 16 patients with OMCTs, 16 patients with ovarian fibromas, 2 patients with ovarian haemorrhage, and 5 patients with pelvic masses of unknown origin, were also excluded. Furthermore, 6 patients whose MRI suggested the presence of solid components were excluded, resulting in a total of 59 excluded patients. All 239 cases were subsequently classified as Bo/Ma-OT or Be-OT, with any patient having even a small portion of Bo/Ma-OT in the pathological diagnosis categorized as Bo/Ma-OT. In this study, Bo-OT and Ma-OT were grouped together as Bo/Ma-OT, as the likelihood of a Ma-OT being identified postoperatively was extremely low, occurring in 3 of 239 patients. This classification allowed for a meaningful comparison with Be-OT. Data from the 239 patients included in the analysis were collected, and the following variables were extracted: (1) basic patient characteristics, such as age, body mass index (BMI), parity, gynaecological surgical history, smoking history, and dysmenorrhea; and (2) OC-related data, such as tumour size (defined as the maximal diameter measured on MRI), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) expression, carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) expression, and coexistent leiomyoma. Additionally, data on 5 MRI-related features were extracted from the radiologists’ interpretation reports: bilateral cysts, multilocular cysts, septal enhancement, suspected mucinous tumours, and suspected adnexal torsion. Comparisons of operation time and blood loss were conducted for reference only, as this study included data from patients treated with various surgical methods, including salpingo-oophorectomy (187 patients), cystectomy (38 patients), unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with contralateral cystectomy (7 patients), salpingectomy (4 patients), salpingectomy with cystectomy (1 patient), and adhesiolysis (2 patients). This comparison included patients with coexistent hysterectomy (1 patient) or myomectomy (1 patient), as well as 3 patients who underwent laparoscopically-assisted surgery, which was considered equivalent to laparoscopic surgery in the analysis.
First, we compared the basic characteristics, including age, BMI, parity, tumour
size, operation time, and blood loss, between patients undergoing Bo/Ma-OT and
those undergoing Be-OT. We then performed the Shapiro-Wilk test for these six
variables: in the Bo/Ma-OT group (n = 26), age (W = 0.94, p = 0.11) and
BMI (W = 0.95, p = 0.30) showed normal distributions, while parity (W =
0.89, p
Finally, candidates for multivariate analysis were selected based on a
p-value
Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel 365 (Microsoft
Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and JMP version 18 for Windows. Associations
between patient characteristics and the likelihood of Bo/Ma-OT diagnosis were
assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, the Pearson chi-square test, and
multivariable logistic regression analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence
intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to quantify the strength of these
associations. A p-value
The final diagnoses determined by pathological examination are summarized in Table 1. Among the 239 cases, 26 were classified as Bo/Ma-OT, and their patient characteristics were compared with those of the 213 patients with Be-OT.
| Pathological diagnosis | Number |
| Ovarian serous cystadenoma | 92 |
| Ovarian mucinous cystadenoma | 53 |
| Ovarian seromucinous cystadenoma | 1 |
| OEC | 10 |
| OMCT | 7 |
| Paraovarian/paratubal cyst | 23 |
| Ovarian haemorrhage | 3 |
| Ovarian/tubal tissue | 7 |
| Corpus luteum cyst | 8 |
| Ovarian struma | 2 |
| Ovarian fibroma | 3 |
| Ovarian adenofibroma | 1 |
| Brenner tumour | 1 |
| Retroperitoneal cyst | 1 |
| Hydrosalpinx | 1 |
| Serous borderline tumour | 4 |
| Mucinous borderline tumour | 18 |
| Clear cell borderline tumour | 1 |
| Granulosa cell tumour | 1 |
| Mucinous adenocarcinoma | 1 |
| Endometrioid adenocarcinoma | 1 |
| Total | 239 |
The final pathological diagnoses of all 239 patients are shown. 11 patients had more than one diagnosis. For these patients, the diagnosis of the primary lesion was used.
OEC, ovarian endometriotic cyst; OMCT, ovarian mature cystic teratoma.
In the simple comparison of patient characteristics, no significant differences
were found between the Bo/Ma-OT and Be-OT groups (Table 2). Operation time was
used for reference only, as the surgical approaches varied across cases. However,
a trend toward a difference in operation time was observed. As shown in Table 3,
simple analysis of the associations between each factor and the likelihood of
Bo/Ma-OT identified 4 significant factors: multilocular cyst, septal enhancement,
suspected mucinous tumour, and tumour size
| Index | Bo/Ma-OT | Be-OT | p-value |
| Age (years) | 53 (22–76) | 54 (13–92) | 0.50 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.3 (16.1–32.5) | 21.8 (14.7–36.4) | 0.53 |
| Parity | 2 (0–5) | 2 (0–6) | 0.70 |
| Tumour size (mm) | 98.5 (43–300) | 80.0 (27–300) | 0.21 |
| Operation time (minute) | 89.5 (42–224) | 77.0 (28–228) | 0.05 |
| Blood loss amount (mL) | 1 (0–489) | 0 (0–300) | 0.58 |
The basic characteristics obtained from the patients’ medical records are summarized. For each factor, the median and the minimum and maximum values for both patients with Bo/Ma-OT and those with Be-OT are shown. Be-OT, benign ovarian tumour; BMI, body mass index; Bo/Ma-OT, borderline/malignant ovarian tumour.
| Factor | Presence vs. Absence | p-value |
| Advanced age | n = 17/132 vs. 9/107 | 0.27 |
| High BMI | n = 9/53 vs. 17/186 | 0.11 |
| Nulliparity | n = 7/64 vs. 19/175 | 0.99 |
| Smoking history | n = 3/25 vs. 23/214 | 0.85 |
| Gynaecological surgical history | n = 7/53 vs. 19/186 | 0.54 |
| Menstrual disorders | n = 12/86 vs. 14/153 | 0.25 |
| Bilateral cyst | n = 18/136 vs. 8/103 | 0.18 |
| Multilocular cyst | n = 12/67 vs. 14/172 | |
| Septal enhancement | n = 11/47 vs. 15/192 | |
| Suspected mucinous tumour | n = 5/19 vs. 21/220 | |
| Suspected adnexal torsion | n = 2/24 vs. 24/215 | 0.67 |
| Coexistent leiomyoma | n = 4/33 vs. 22/206 | 0.81 |
| CA19-9 positivity | n = 1/12 vs. 25/227 | 0.77 |
| CA125 positivity | n = 4/21 vs. 22/218 | 0.21 |
| Tumour size 10 cm or larger | n = 13/84 vs. 13/155 | 0.09 |
| Tumour size 15 cm or larger | n = 6/25 vs. 20/214 |
Based on the presence or absence of 16 factors extracted from patient medical records, the 239 patients were divided into two groups, with 26 patients in the Bo/Ma-OT group and 213 patients in the Be-OT group, and between-group comparisons were performed. Among these 16 factors, 2 were related to tumour size. The p-values were calculated using Pearson’s chi-square test. Advanced age was defined as 50 years or older, and high BMI was defined as 25 kg/m2 or above. CA125, carbohydrate antigen 125; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9.
Among the candidate factors selected based on the simple analyses, none differed
significantly between the groups (Table 4). Only septal enhancement had
p-value
| Factor | OR (95% CI) | p-value |
| Multilocular cyst | 1.4 (0.5–3.8) | 0.56 |
| Septal enhancement | 2.7 (1.0–7.1) | 0.06 |
| Suspected mucinous tumour | 1.5 (0.4–5.5) | 0.57 |
| Large tumour | 2.4 (0.7–6.9) | 0.14 |
Multivariate analyses of 239 patients were performed to examine the effects of the 4 factors for which data were collected from the medical records. The ORs and 95% CIs for the incidence of these factors and the p-values are shown in this table. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
With the recent trend towards minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery for OTs [1, 11], the criteria for preoperative diagnosis Bo/Ma-OT may become increasingly important. This study focused on cystic lesions, primarily Se/Mu-OCs, which are considered relatively difficult to distinguish on MRI [9]. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with the likelihood of a postoperative Bo/Ma-OT diagnosis to improve the accuracy of preoperative prediction [12, 13].
First, chi-square tests were conducted to compare the effect of each factor on
predicting a Bo/Ma-OT diagnosis. Four factors, including multilocular cyst,
septal enhancement, suspected mucinous tumour, and tumour size
However, the study is limited by its retrospective design, reliance on data from a single local institution, and relatively small sample size. As all potential risk factors shown in Table 3 were collected from available medical records, there is a possibility for bias. However, although the selection of factors may be limited, it can also be considered an advantage that we performed multivariate analysis after first conducting a simple comparison and narrowing the target factors. In fact, as shown in Table 4, some MRI findings, such as septal enhancement, had relatively small p-values. Therefore, further case accumulation and multicenter studies may enable more accurate analyses in the future.
In conclusion, no factors were identified that significantly increased the risk of Bo/Ma-OT diagnosis after laparoscopic surgery. As some MRI findings showed relatively small p-values, future large-scale studies are needed to improve diagnostic accuracy.
The datasets analysed in this study are not publicly available due to privacy concerns. However, anonymized and processed data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
KT and WI collected and processed the clinical data in detail and drafted the manuscript. SH supervised the overall study. SH, SM, RA, WI, KT, YM, JT, and MN were all involved in the initial data collection from patient records and contributed substantially to discussions throughout multiple departmental conferences, where the study design, data interpretation, and manuscript revisions were repeatedly reviewed and improved. SH and RA determined the surgical methods and supervised all medical procedures. All authors contributed to editorial changes in the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have participated sufficiently in the work and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was reviewed and approved by the Human Ethical Committee of Kinan Hospital (Approval No. 283). Informed consent was obtained from all patients.
This research was supported by Kinan Hospital with respect to the provision of medical information.
This research received no external funding.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: IMR Press stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
