Background: This cross-sectional epidemiological study aimed to compare
the differences in physical fitness variables according to the skinfold thickness
in the thigh area in adults and Korean older individuals. Methods: We analyzed data from the 2015 National Fitness Survey. A
total of 4034 healthy adults (2442 men, 1592 women) with an average age of 38.19
12.41 years and 880 healthy older subjects (369 men, 511 women) with an
average age of 72.32 5.49 years participated in this study. The skinfold
thickness of the thigh was measured using a skinfold caliper (Dynatron,
Dynatronics, USA). The participants underwent physical fitness tests, including
the hand squeeze strength test, abdominal curl ups, standing double-leg long
jump, 50 m shuttle run, sit and reach, and 20 m shuttle run for adult men and
women. Older men and women performed the following tests: hand squeeze strength,
abdominal curl ups, sit to stand test, single leg balance (open eyes), sit and
reach, Apley scratch test for shoulder mobility, and 6-minute walk test.
Independent t-tests and Pearson correlation analyses were used for the
analysis. Results: Among the older men, significant differences were found in
thigh skinfold thickness (t = –21.122, p 0.001), abdominal
curl ups (t = 2.165, p = 0.031), and sit and reach in men
(t = 2.609, p = 0.009), and thigh skinfold (t =
–29.611, p 0.001), and Apley scratch test for shoulder mobility in
women (t = –2.120, p = 0.034). There was a significant
correlation between thigh skinfold thickness and physical activity (thigh
skinfold thickness) in adult men (t = –54.202, p 0.001),
nondominant hand squeeze strength (t = 2.632, p = 0.009),
abdominal curl ups (t = 4.292, p 0.001), sit and reach
(t = 3.063, p = 0.002), twenty meters shuttle run (t =
4.657, p 0.001).
However, no significant differences were found in
dominant hand squeeze strength, standing double leg long jump, or 50 m shuttle
run in men (p 0.05). In adult women, there was a significant
correlation between thigh skinfold thickness and physical activity (thigh
skinfold thickness (t = –49.405, p 0.001), dominant hand
squeeze strength (t = 7.789, p 0.001), nondominant hand
squeeze strength (t = 6.944, p 0.001), abdominal curl ups
(t = 5.347, p 0.001), standing double leg long jump
(t = 5.890, p 0.001), sit and reach (t = 5.384,
p 0.001), twenty meter shuttle run (t = 5.223, p 0.001).
However, no significant differences were found in fifty meter shuttle
run in women (p 0.05). Among older men, only single leg balance and
sit and reach were correlated with thigh skinfold (single leg balance r
= 0.169, p = 0.01; sit and reach r = –0.201, p =
0.001). In women, only abdominal curl ups, sit and reach, and Apley scratch test
correlated with thigh skinfold (abdominal curl ups r = –0.088,
p = 0.002; sit and reach r = –0.137, p = 0.002; Apley
scratch test r = 0.090, p = 0.041). Conclusions: The effect of thigh skinfold thickness on the level of
physical activity was more pronounced in adults than in older subjects. Our
findings show that muscle strength and body fat in the lower extremities can
affect overall muscle strength, endurance, and balance.